Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
nittany ramModerator
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by
nittany ram.
nittany ramModeratorWord is, last night’s episode was a good one.
I am lining them up for later.
Both the 1st and 2nd episode of the season were good.
But I have a feeling they were just the deep breath before the plunge, with episode 3 being the plunge.
nittany ramModerator
nittany ramModerator
nittany ramModeratorSiri. Find me a headline that proves we’ve lost it. https://t.co/ux6q9jbRTO
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) April 20, 2019
nittany ramModeratorNice work, Jack.
However, I think the Rams will trade out of the first round.
nittany ramModeratorIn potentially related news, we’ve brought dead pig brains back to life…
nittany ramModeratorAnyone watching?
Maybe this is the year Gilligan and the gang get off that island?
…
Yup.
All the key players are gravitating to Winterfell.
nittany ramModeratorHow the human sense of good taste degrades over time.
I remember getting Football Digest in the late 70s and early 80s and they occasionally printed results from various best uniform polls. In every one of those polls I remember the Rams uniform was either 1st or 2nd.
Now, those exact same uniforms are only 6th?
Society is in a free fall; morally, ethically, aesthetically…
nittany ramModerator“…. it has become increasingly difficult to separate sensible health advice from what should be consider, well, insane…”
Well this is what I’ve been saying for a coupla years now. This is my mantra. Its not just ‘health advice’. Its politics. Its everything. Its ‘increasingly difficult‘ to know what is accurate and what is not.
w
vI don’t think this is fixable either. Anyone at anytime can publish anything they want on the internet. It’s not hard to dress up any piece of nonsense and make it look legitimate to untrained eyes.
And the media certainly isn’t vetting much in their eagerness to fill a 24 hour news cycle. I know a lot of questionable studies that never would have seen the light of day in the past are now being paraded in front of the public as if they represent consensus. They’ll publish anything they think will generate clicks.
nittany ramModeratorA good omen…
whew pic.twitter.com/COvUkQyA0f
— The Museum of English Rural Life (@TheMERL) April 10, 2019
nittany ramModeratorWell, there was an 8ft long centipede/millipede relative that lived 300 million years ago named Arthropleura…

nittany ramModeratorNot sure what you have against insects.
I know some are icky but insects are people too. Show them more respect.
I have nothing against them; I’m just tired of enabling them.
It’s about time they learned to stand on their own six feet.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by
nittany ram.
nittany ramModeratorActually, that study that article is based on has come under some criticism.
First of all, it was a review of only 73 studies. That’s not a lot when looking at ‘global’ insect populations. Secondly, most of the studies they looked at came from Europe and the US. Here again, it doesn’t tell us much about global populations.
The biggest problem is that the research focused only on exploring the already declining insect populations. It did not include the studies showing stable and growing populations. So, if you were studying the survival of the human species but limited your data to people with end stage kidney disease, it would lead you to the conclusion that humanity would be extinct in the next 5 years.
Here’s more…
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 2 months ago by
nittany ram.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 2 months ago by
nittany ram.
nittany ramModeratorBasically the New Yorker article about the Tanis site has caused quite a controversy in scientific circles.
Apparently it was a no-no for the lead author of the study to collaborate with the New Yorker on an article on research that wasn’t published yet, or at least, not available to the scientific community. The paper is now available and was read by Dr Steve Brusette, who tweeted about it above. Apparently, the lead investigator (DePalma) has a reputation of making a discovery and then running to the press. I know he took some flack in the past for jumping the gun causing him to mistake turtle bones for Dakotaraptor, (a big velociraptor-like dinosaur).
Nobody questions that the site isn’t incredible, but the actual research paper doesn’t mention a lot of stuff in the article. The site is supposedly a dinosaur ‘graveyard’, but only one partial dinosaur bone is mentioned in the paper even though the New Yorker article says that feathers, eggs with embryos, and representatives of every dinosaur from the Hell Creek formation were found at the site. None of this is mentioned in the study. In fact, according to Brussette, the actual study wasn’t about dinosaurs at all.
So, he and a lot of others are asking, “what gives?”
Thanks. Yeah some of that stuff is a little odd.
…
Hopefully the things in the New Yorker article (feathers, dinosaur embryos, etc) from the first paper will be included in subsequent papers. That would be really cool and would probably make this the greatest paleontological discovery of all time.
Well, the greatest since they found Noah’s ark, anyway. Although technically that would be the greatest ‘arkeological’ find.
nittany ramModeratorBasically the New Yorker article about the Tanis site has caused quite a controversy in scientific circles.
Apparently it was a no-no for the lead author of the study to collaborate with the New Yorker on an article on research that wasn’t published yet, or at least, not available to the scientific community. The paper is now available and was read by Dr Steve Brusette, who tweeted about it above. Apparently, the lead investigator (DePalma) has a reputation of making a discovery and then running to the press. I know he took some flack in the past for jumping the gun causing him to mistake turtle bones for Dakotaraptor, (a big velociraptor-like dinosaur).
Nobody questions that the site isn’t incredible, but the actual research paper doesn’t mention a lot of stuff in the article. The site is supposedly a dinosaur ‘graveyard’, but only one partial dinosaur bone is mentioned in the paper even though the New Yorker article says that feathers, eggs with embryos, and representatives of every dinosaur from the Hell Creek formation were found at the site. None of this is mentioned in the study. In fact, according to Brussette, the actual study wasn’t about dinosaurs at all.
So, he and a lot of others are asking, “what gives?”
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 2 months ago by
nittany ram.
nittany ramModeratorAfter the @NewYorker broke the 'dinosaur graveyard' story last week, the @PNASNews peer-reviewed research paper on the end-Cretaceous Tanis site is officially released today. These are my current thoughts:
— Steve Brusatte (@SteveBrusatte) April 1, 2019
The site is amazing. Potentially a discovery of enormous magnitude. The geology seems credible to me: it records a catastrophic event at or near the end-Cretaceous asteroid impact. The fish fossils are *astounding*. Congrats to the team!
— Steve Brusatte (@SteveBrusatte) April 1, 2019
I've had about 20 journalists ask me about the 'dinosaur graveyard.' I've done my best (in my free time and transit time on a research trip) to read the research paper and give my honest opinion on what is the biggest dinosaur story in quite some time.
— Steve Brusatte (@SteveBrusatte) April 1, 2019
It wasn't fair to anyone (the authors of the paper, other scientists, the general public) that a few random scientists like me were sent copies of the paper before it was published. But the genie could not go back into the bottle once the @NewYorker story came out.
— Steve Brusatte (@SteveBrusatte) April 1, 2019
But today everybody can finally read the paper, and I am very much looking forward to the crowd-sourced opinions of *everyone*. There is a real thrill and a real mystery around this discovery, and it is EXCITING! Let's see where the evidence leads…
— Steve Brusatte (@SteveBrusatte) April 1, 2019
March 26, 2019 at 6:57 am in reply to: Coaches frustrated with lack of replay action at league meetings #99295
nittany ramModeratorHey, king of Bounty Gate, nobody cares.
LOL.
They ought to make it so that the coach can challenge a penalty, however, the entire play should be reviewed so that if any other missed penalty is found, it too can be enforced.
For example, on the missed PI Payton is complaining about, Donald was facemasked. So, the PI would be overturned but it would also be offset by the facemask.
There are missed penalties on nearly every play. If one can be called into question, why not all?
nittany ramModerator“I expect my position to be fluid. I expect I’ll have a variety of roles,” Matthews said.
Not sure how he’s going to stop anyone if he’s fluid.
Although, I suppose tar is a fluid and it’s pretty sticky.Ya think that’s what he meant?
Tar?
He’s going to play like tar?
That’s the only thing that makes sense.
nittany ramModeratorMaybe it had less to do with the Creole food, and more to do with what was added to the Creole food.
Maybe the locals decided to strike back at their oppressors.
nittany ramModeratorI’m a scientist. That’s because I post stuff about science. It’s true that I can’t do the math. But, that’s just a technicality.
You drink, and you post things.

nittany ramModeratorBut, unless I’m mistaken, you’re an actual scientist in real life, so your view would be a great addition.
Technically that may be true, but I don’t work in reseach, so it’s probably more accurate to say that I work IN science rather than I AM a scientist.
nittany ramModeratorI haven’t read those books, Billy. They do look interesting so when I get a chance I will check them out.
nittany ramModerator— Jesse Ferguson (@JesseFFerguson) March 11, 2019
nittany ramModeratorI’m ok with the signing too. He’s a decent edge player, and the Rams only signed him to a one year ‘prove it’ deal.
But I want a dynamic, Kevin Greene type guy on the edge. Someone to compliment Aaron Donald’s inside push. Fowler will flash on occasion, but he’s not going to be a guy that can get 16 sacks. They need two OLBs, and I’m ok with Fowler being one of them, but I still want an impact player on the edge.
nittany ramModeratorVincent Bonsignore@VinnyBonsignore
FYI on Dante Fowler/#Rams contract: The deal is worth as much as $14 million, depending on incentives earned. Think of it this way: If he has a great year, he will have earned back the fifth-year number the #Jaguars didn’t pick up on his rookie dealI don’t think Fowler is special though. I want a 16 sack guy on the edge and I don’t think he’s it.
March 11, 2019 at 11:48 am in reply to: Well, you can cross Wheaties off as an acceptable breakfast option… #98774
nittany ramModeratorThey always did sux. They made an inedible soggy mess. Now, Rice Krispys or Shredded Wheat, there is a cereal.
.
What cereal gets a picture of Antonio Brown?But I liked soggy Wheaties. 🙁
Cap’n Crunch is by far the best synthetic breakfast food ever conjured. I’d eat it even if they put a picture of Fran Tarkenton, Joe Montana, and Tom Brady in a three way embrace on the cover.
nittany ramModeratorFrom the article zn posted…
Peele produces the film alongside Jason Blum and Sean McKittrick (with the trio previously having collaborated on Get Out and BlacKkKlansman)
March 10, 2019 at 9:08 am in reply to: The A. Brown saga … Buffalo? … 3/10 update: it's AB to the Raiders #98706
nittany ramModeratorSteelers forced to eat $21 million in cap this year and only get a 3rd and 5th.
I guess it was unavoidable, but, man…
nittany ramModeratorI plan on seeing it. I really liked Get Out and Blackkklansman.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by
-
AuthorPosts

