Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 1, 2016 at 6:46 pm in reply to: informal poll–for or against trading up? trading down? staying put? #41307HramParticipant
I agree with Ag.
HramParticipantHave we all forgotten that after all this time we’ve yet to find a replacement for Massey. Come on people. Where are we going to get that position filled in the draft?
This is a quandary, since, as you know, it is very difficult to trade up above the 1st pick of the 1st round. Not impossible of course, just difficult. And yet where else are they going to find someone worthy of the position and its history.
So you’re saying there is a chance…
HramParticipantHave we all forgotten that after all this time we’ve yet to find a replacement for Massey. Come on people. Where are we going to get that position filled in the draft?
HramParticipantThe guy simply makes plays.
That is an accurate description.
If they were coming out the same year, I would take him over Mannion. He reminds me of Tarkington. An escape artist. One time last year he was running to his left and threw a 20 yard bullet left handed. He is also accurate on the long ball.
HramParticipantSlow delivery and occasional poor decision-making are the two issues he had in college. They will need to change his mechanics and give him enough reps that he starts to develop muscle memory on places to throw and not to throw if they hope for him to develop.
I follow both Oregon teams closely and I believe they drafted Mannion about three rounds too high.
HramParticipantNever lived in the Cleveland, Anaheim, LA or St. Louis. I am just a vagabond Rams fan who will cheer for them regardless of where they play.
My heart goes out to those of you like DAK who feel so sad on this day.
HramParticipantThey need mid-grade QB play. That and some health should be enough to get to 10.
They should be able to keep most of the components of the defense together with their salary cap space.
I’m assuming they get improvement out of half of all the olinemen they picked up the last two years.To get to more than 10 I think they’d also need one really good, legit WR.
QB is an imperative.
I don’t believe the QB or the wr are currently on the roster.
Maybe they can trade one of their seconds for someone’s number 2 QB. Whose got a good one?
HramParticipantI imagine we will lose at Arizona, Seattle and Green Bay. The rest of them we have a chance to win. If your OL can play even close to middle of the pack by the end of the first quarter of the season and you start out to into, barring a rash of injuries, I believe we will win 10 or 11 games.
I am glad that lyser and his potty mouth are planning on going to heaven, it gives me more hope.
July 29, 2015 at 9:00 pm in reply to: time for the "barring injuries" season record predictions #27741HramParticipantNo injuries including a healthy QB? I’m going 11 and five with that.
HramParticipant“…He’s paying attention…his effort…”
I take that to mean he was less dedicated before this year thinking he could get by more on his natural athleticism. Figuring that out may be something some gifted athletes have to learn, but I’d guess from all we’ve heard that he is more focused this year.
June 22, 2015 at 9:16 am in reply to: indicators that do the best job of separating winners from losers on the field #26654HramParticipantRunning a lot and passing very effectively.
Having a great enough defense that the opposing quarterbacks pass efficiency is worse than your own.
Per this article, the Rams are building a team best prepared to win today.
Doesn’t matter how many yards you gain running or passing (although more yards doesn’t hurt) what matters is that you run often and you’re passing efficiency is better than the opposing teams.
HramParticipantIs he a mauler? A good guard but I am not sure his style of play will fit this tea.
HramParticipantIt probably has something to do with athleticism, size and long arms, but what do you think he really meant by that comment?
June 6, 2015 at 11:01 am in reply to: This could definitely be the best defense in NFL in 2015 #25945HramParticipantThey have some serious young talent due to the extra picks from the RG3 trade and added to it this year with the cap savings from the Bradford trade. Plus, none of them are rookies and the coordinator is going into his second year with the team.
Provided the offense can be close to average and they don’t suffer an undue amount of injuries, they should be a top 5 defense. Anything else would be disappointing.
June 1, 2015 at 6:29 pm in reply to: Monday morning question: which Rams players can become elite at their position #25663HramParticipantHekker
Zutlein
And if only they could resign home one more time…Massey!HramParticipantGood talented death at multiple positions even though they are young makes me optimistic. Plus they have not yet sustain any serious injuries.
HramParticipantI think we should just figure out each week when we game plan how to score more points than the other team.
May 21, 2015 at 10:27 am in reply to: How do you feel about a starting tackle pair of Robinson & Havenstein? #25025HramParticipantWe’ll be okay if the line stays healthy and if one of our three center candidates steps up.
That’s two big ifs. Too much to make me confident.
May 4, 2015 at 7:05 pm in reply to: now that the dust has settled a bit, how do you feel about this draft? #24045HramParticipantI like that they seem to go for extremely athletic potential all pros in the first round and did it again this year. I am very glad they did not reach to fill a position of need it in the first round.
Love that they went ugly early with offense lineman who have experience and look good on tape. If even two of them work out, the Rams will be in good shape for the next couple of years provided they get adequate quarterback play.
I appreciate how they drafted for their philosophy this year and that they stand a good chance of simply wearing teams out by the fourth quarter of games in the near future.
I do not believe Manion will be a good professional because he is slow to read and slow to throw. However, he is very tall and if they can work on his mechanics and have a good running game so he can do play action, he may be good.
Overall I love drafting a bunch of big uglies!
HramParticipantI am buying it in the top couple of rounds or the talent can be very high except for a few low density positions if you already have a young All-Pro there like Center or tight end. Otherwise if you have someone that is truly that much higher rank than everyone else even if it is not a position of need then you should take them. If you do not need them this year he will in one or two years.
Very good starting quality offense of guards can be handled through the third round of this draft and they can always add a little bit to the money they are offering a Barksdale to get him to sign .
HramParticipantI think Mason started the first 4-8 games of the season. Gurley will probably start the 2nd half, but having Mason come in for 10-12 carries a game keeps the play action pass game going.
It’s a deep draft for Olinemen, just not many that projected as strong first rounders.
HramParticipantESPN said the Rams had Mariota 1 and Gurley 2. Regardless, if one of your top two guys is on the board at 10, you take him.
Unexpected pick. But, if he comes back healthy (read a report that it was a clean ACL tear meaning not a lot of other collateral damage) and he’s projected as the best back since Adrian Peterson then it makes sense. BPA and fits with the team identity.
Can get some damn fine Guards and centers in the 2nd and 3rd rounds this year. This draft is deep in interior lineman and I expect they will take at least one in the next two rounds and probably another by the end of the draft.
Glad we didn’t reach for Oline help.
Bet we come up with something Barksdale will agree to within the next couple of weeks. 🙂
April 21, 2015 at 7:30 pm in reply to: So the great debate continues to divide Ramdom — how good is Barksdale? #22973HramParticipantI think he is probably somewhere in the top 20 or so right tackles in the league. Maybe top 25 but he does know our scheme coaches and players. Good enough to not be a hindrance if the rest of the law line is solid.
I’d give him 4 million a year if I was a billionaire and had that much pocket change and Space.
April 17, 2015 at 8:18 am in reply to: Jeremiah: Winston, Mariota only starting QBs in draft … + Rams & Mariota #22789HramParticipantIf he drops within range they should consider it. Giving him a redshirt year behind Foles would be the perfect start to this very hard working young player’s career.
March 30, 2015 at 6:37 pm in reply to: Tim Barnes visiting Kansas City – He has now agreed to terms with Rams #21811HramParticipantI would have paid more for Massey to come back. Still, if it is for the vet minimum it is probably a smart move. he knows the system, is a year older and stronger and can compete for a backup job.
March 30, 2015 at 5:01 pm in reply to: OL in free agency … Barksdale, Blalock, Wisniewski, etc. #21794HramParticipantWell what the heck, I vote for giving him the less money now and not waiting until the draft
March 29, 2015 at 8:50 am in reply to: McShay, others speculate Rams might be interested in Mariota #21714HramParticipantJack, Mariota played in a spread in college and, imo, would best be served by a redshirt year, but I disagree that he is a spread QB. I also do not think that if Bradford had been able to stay healthy that we’d be talking about him as a “spread” QB. Compare Bradfords rookie numbers to most rookie QBs even those that became elite. They match up very well.
Mariota is bright, dedicated, a very hard worker and the consumate teammate. He also likes to win. He has a lively enough arm, throws pretty accurately on the move while keeping his eyes downfield and has great escapability. I have little doubt he will become comfortable taking snaps and being a pocket passer if that is what is asked of him. He work ethic is on the high end.
Whether he will make it is another thing because there are so many intangibles that go into QBing in the NFL. But Mariota does have an awful lot of intangibles going for him. 🙂
March 18, 2015 at 6:13 pm in reply to: Big Board: Lack of sizzle doesn't mean this class lacks substance #20908HramParticipantI really do not think Huntley is going to make a good NFL quarterback. I watched a bunch of his games this year and he just does not seem to have it. He is athletic but I believe he lacks patience, speed of processing information and accuracy.
I do not know anything about Grayson.
- This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Hram.
HramParticipantCheap back up guard and third string right tackle. Worked with our own line coach before a couple of years ago
And hacksaw’s son!
Count me in. 🙂
HramParticipantGood trade in my opinion because of Bradford’s injury history. We were giving him too much to take the chance on him if we could come away with a decent alternative. With this trade, we have a decent alternative.
-
AuthorPosts