Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 391 through 420 (of 520 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AD to sign soon? #89399
    Hram
    Participant

    I’m going on a hunger strike until AD actually signs.

    w
    v

    I’m with you.

    in reply to: Rams extend Gurley 4 years, $60 million… #88464
    Hram
    Participant

    Suddenly in the last year we have the appearance of a franchise with a clear vision that knows what they are doing.

    Locking in young talent that will play together for the next several years keeps the window open.

    Cool.

    in reply to: Rams Sign Brandin Cooks to 5-Year Extension #88245
    Hram
    Participant

    Yea!

    And he is still playing this year at 8.5. Even better!

    in reply to: Thinking out loud: the cap in 2020 and who to keep #87354
    Hram
    Participant

    If Gurley is as good as Faulk, you keep Gurley.

    Otherwise I agree with you that good RBs are easier to find. I believe they can play earlier at a higher level than most positions.

    How about we pay Goff 28; Donald 21; cooks 15; Peters 14 and we keep Joyner, Brockers and Kupp. 🙂

    in reply to: informal poll: which 2 out of 3 #86449
    Hram
    Participant

    Goff and Donald

    in reply to: Rams draft hit rates compared to other teams #85917
    Hram
    Participant

    Good discussion.

    Might be interesting to differentiate between starters (I’d include the nickel guy with starters) and bakups/roll players.

    Then again maybe not, could become too complicated. 🙂

    in reply to: Rams draft hit rates compared to other teams #85915
    Hram
    Participant

    I’ve just never thought that he was that great of a weapon as a gadget player that he can be counted as a hit regardless of where he was drafted.

    I believe he is a career backup part time gadget player.

    If he was a 4th rounder or lower, that would be okay, but I still wouldn’t count him as a hit. But it would be okay for that amount of draft capital.

    in reply to: Rams draft hit rates compared to other teams #85904
    Hram
    Participant

    Teams had to account for Tavon a couple years ago because he was the best of the worst, not because he is good.

    A well above average returner whose ball security brings him down to above average.

    A below average runner whose change of pace skills are helpful, but he is still below average.

    A below average wide receiver.

    He is not a trung candidate level bust, but imo opinion career backups who can’t get on the field much are not hits.

    in reply to: your take on the draft? #85579
    Hram
    Participant

    Understand, but no 1st or 2nd rounders this year and their percentage is a tad higher than the rest. 🙂

    in reply to: your take on the draft? #85575
    Hram
    Participant

    Possible, but it is well documented over many years that you are optimistic this time of year. 🙂

    All these folks have time to develop and we may have filled out our practice squad with draft picks alone and given the upside of some, that could turn out to be a good thing.

    Meat and potatoes draft of lineman and linebackers. I like it in that I think it was exactly what they needed given all the sparkle was picked up in the off-season.

    Saving a couple million by trading tavon may help with a signing or two, so we have that going for us.

    in reply to: Allen: tweets & other bits on pick 111 #85536
    Hram
    Participant

    I like that they went online the first two picks. It makes a great deal of strategic sense to me. I have zero idea if these were the two to take.

    I bet we take one more before the end of the 6th.

    in reply to: Noteboom: tweets n bits #85466
    Hram
    Participant

    Athletic ability of an early pick so if he can be taught (he seems coachable) then he has the chance to be a good LT. I thought they might go Crosby, but they probably like Joe’s upside better.

    I bet they take at least one more online man in the 6th since they will have so many opportunities.

    Bets for the 4th round? I’m going to say two linebackers or edge rushers and a DB.

    Unless Crosby drops, he could play guard or tackle, provided he tackle if healthy and would push Havenstein and brown even his rookie year imo..

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by Hram.
    in reply to: lots of trading going on. #85429
    Hram
    Participant

    Or gain 2 4th rounders.

    I agree, that would be funny.

    Unlikely IMO, but pretty funny. 🙂

    in reply to: Snead on His Willingness to Trade/MMQB #85018
    Hram
    Participant

    I don’t think you draft players to be on your team anymore.

    I think you acquire players, one way is through the draft, to be on your teams for their current (or pendimg like Cooks) contract.

    It’s a subtle difference that may cause draft picks to be more or less important depending on a couple things like where you are at on the “really actually competitive window” curve.

    Enough draft picks don’t pan out that in some ways it negates the cheap labor on the rookie deal that you drafted yourself argument. Maybe, somewhat.

    in reply to: Tweet 4/6 : Schefter, Rams release Kayvon Webster #84972
    Hram
    Participant

    suh gives an impressive interview.

    I think Webster may not have been ready at the beginning of the year anyway. Can’t keep everyone and I think he graded out about average for CBs last year.

    in reply to: Rams trade for Brandin Cooks #84835
    Hram
    Participant

    I believe cooks is a number one wide receiver. He gained 1000 yards and had seven touchdowns for the last three years with two different teams that spread the ball around

    I hope they can sign him to a long term deal

    in reply to: OBJ trade talk? #84682
    Hram
    Participant

    I concur with both ZNs comments.

    Don’t love obj for this team.

    Trading for short term mercs then pocketing the comp pick at the back end is likely the new norm.

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 10 months ago by Hram.
    in reply to: Watkins signs with KC #83969
    Hram
    Participant

    They traded a lower 2nd round pick this year for a comp 3rd round pick next year to get Watkins services for last year.

    I think we struggle to make the playoffs last year without Watkins and therefore believe it was worth the one year rental price to assist in building the winning culture.

    For this year, given Kupp’s performance last year, I think Watkins is a nice to have, but not a need.

    Need is signing AD.

    in reply to: Rams trade Ogletree #83600
    Hram
    Participant

    This one I did not expect.

    Either Wade has lost it, or he completed his assessment over the past year and is jettisoning everyone who doesn’t fit his scheme.

    I’m guessing they don’t pick up anyone really expensive in free agency and use the savings they acquire to front load a couple contracts to preserve some cap space over the next four years.

    The defense may be a little rough over the first third of the year.

    in reply to: should the Rams sign Watkins or move on? #82735
    Hram
    Participant

    Based on reports from a couple years ago compared to last year, I believe he is maturing. I believe on a team with good coaches who will explain to him the why, and given a complete offseason with the Rams, he will become that much more lethal.

    He draws coverages because he both stretches the field and makes tough catches in traffic. He a physical receiver. His combination of traits makes a difference in opening things for everyone else even when he personally does not get have a high level of production.

    I recommend keeping him if it doesn’t break the bank because I don’t think you can replace him with one person and having him on the field makes things better for everyone else.

    in reply to: should the Rams sign Watkins or move on? #82716
    Hram
    Participant

    He showed really strong hands on those slants for TD when the Rams were close to the goal line. If he will sign for 12-15, then Rams will have locked in a very good young wide receiver group for the next4-5 years.

    in reply to: reactions to the FALCONS game #80055
    Hram
    Participant

    It appeared that the rams inexperience showed pretty strongly on offense until partly through the second quarter. Defense came to play the whole game.

    The Falcons were slightly better today imo, but not by a lot. The two turnovers sealed it for them.

    Donald was a beast. The new kicker came through.

    The rams will be better next year even if they came back with the exact same team. McVay will also be better.

    I think they need another Dlineman, linebacker and an OT who can move to the left side in a year or two. If we can’t sign trumaine, we’ll also need a CB.

    Might want to draft a QB to groom as future #2.

    I sign Watkins, see what happens when he participates in the offseason. I think it will make a positive difference in his game.

    Time to say goodbye to Tavon. Not with what we are paying him.

    • This reply was modified 7 years ago by Hram.
    Hram
    Participant

    It’s not the exciting last drive of the game comeback, but to me it is still a comeback in the 4th quarter.

    We are going to miss Zurlein in the playoffs. Playoffs? pLAYOFFS!!!

    in reply to: i only have one thing to say #75950
    Hram
    Participant

    I agree!

    in reply to: Solid draft imo #68081
    Hram
    Participant

    I’m on my phone which makes it difficult for me. Would you be willing to movie it if you can? Thanks

    in reply to: Sam Rogers #68071
    Hram
    Participant

    Lot of worse things you can do with a 6th round pick than select the best full back in the draft.

    Heck, I’d do it every 6-8 years just because. Particularly if they are special teams demons and have a great heart with incredible work ethic.

    in reply to: McQuaide picked for Pro Bowl #63911
    Hram
    Participant

    Ask Danny white or Steve Young, it is hard to follow a legend. McQuaide is going to turn out to be a great one .

    Still, it does piss me off that Massey was never selected!

    in reply to: 31 … are you concerned about SMcV's age? #63740
    Hram
    Participant

    Experience matters. He is likely to be a better HC five years from now compared to what he will be next year .

    in reply to: Rams defensive staff hoping to stay #62545
    Hram
    Participant

    While I doubt it happens, keeping the defensive staff is a viable course of action.

    They were/are good and with even an average offense would become more dominant.

    Hram
    Participant

    I’m sure the money helps, but it doesn’t necessarily mean it can’t be stressful. Expectations are high and the job requires a lot of hours.

    It is true that they do not need to be concerned where they are getting their food for that day.

    Humans are interesting creatures and stress is a difficult topic to understand.

Viewing 30 posts - 391 through 420 (of 520 total)