2 draft notes… DEs & secondary

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › 2 draft notes… DEs & secondary

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 4, 2016 at 11:19 am #56798
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    off the net from alyoshamucci

    DE) Maybe the best DE draft ever. Great top end, great second tier. Im not even going to get into the players … but Im certain to say that names like these will last till our pick in round 2 .. Lawson, Wormley, Walker, Chubb, Charleton, Wise, Fields … and those guys are all special. They go in round two because there are THAT many special players ahead of them in round 1, and so many DBs.
    have a huge list of players … just YUGE

    DE, I think Rams will take two. It’s a strong and deep class …I figure a 2nd and 4th or 5th rounder … there will be second round talent in round 4 and maybe 5. I don’t even have a line on some of the beasts in the FCS.

    CB) Good top end, not elite … but really deep. If something happened and we needed a starter we could get one in round 2 … and there are likely going ot be solid depth players available like Gaines was in the 6th …

    S) Best year for S since the Berry-E Thomas year. I have three top 10 players … Peppers, Adams, and Hooker. The guy I am geeking out on Washington state isn’t even on the radar yet, but Luani will be … I would love him in the 3rd. This is IF we need to replace Mo.

    ….

    off the net from thehammer

    rams scouts are busy attending college games where top de’s are playing

    January 3, 2017 at 5:59 pm #62320
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    alyoshamucci

    DE) Maybe the best DE draft ever. Great top end, great second tier. …there will be second round talent in round 4 and maybe 5

    and so many DBs.

    CB) Good top end, not elite

    —

    off the net from alyoshamucci

    what I’m seeing:

    Quality starter at 37.

    DE, CB, WR … there should be a few. The DBs in this draft are high end and deep … but I’d much rather go DE or WR which are also high end and deep

    January 3, 2017 at 6:15 pm #62323
    sanbagger
    Participant

    So…If they bring in an O minded coach, would he be OK going D with their first pick…on day 2 mind you?

    That’s where keeping Sneed could pay dividends. The guy knows the team and he has been in contact with the scouts all season. He could pursuade a Shanahan or a McD and if he has final say we don’t see reaches…I’m all for the best available even though I’m a known O-line builder type.

    January 3, 2017 at 6:18 pm #62324
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator
    sanbagger wrote:

    So…If they bring in an O minded coach, would he be OK going D with their first pick…on day 2 mind you?

    I know what you’re saying but I hope so.

    This team is not going to have a top offense in one year no matter what they do.

    They will still have to rely on a top defense to win.

    And…without DEs, it’s not a top defense.

    January 3, 2017 at 6:24 pm #62325
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    so the dline is supposed to be the strength of this team and we’re hoping to draft 2 defensive ends. and mind you i actually don’t necessarily disagree. the rams NEED defensive ends.

    i think it just shows exactly how much work this teams needs.

    January 3, 2017 at 6:25 pm #62326
    sanbagger
    Participant
    zn wrote:

    This team is not going to have a top offense in one year no matter what they do.

    Agreed. It will take a lot of discipline, as an O minded coach, to take a D guy when your first pick in your first draft is on day 2.

    That’s where you have to stay true to your board and if you put a new GM in place assembling that board…well, I lose confidence.

    IMO, Snead is critical at this juncture going in to next year.

    I’m a believer in staying true to the board, that netted us wins like Donald…when you start to reach it can be a home run or it can get you fired. I also don’t want a HC to have total control…the GM should have last say IMO.

    January 3, 2017 at 6:50 pm #62330
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator
    InvaderRam wrote:

    o the dline is supposed to be the strength of this team and we’re hoping to draft 2 defensive ends.

    Well IMO the DL won’t be the strength of the team UNLESS they draft 2 ends.

    Quinn has been hurt for 2 consecutive seasons now, and Hayes is up there and not that productive. They need a rotation at both DE spots.

    OR teams just double/triple Donald and there’s no defense.

    I think they can get things out of this offense without pouring in a ton of resources.

    But they won’t win if they let the defense slide while trying to get a top offense. That would just be gray area hell.

    ..

    January 3, 2017 at 6:58 pm #62331
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I am for making the offensive line the number one priority. But, when it comes to drafting, I am going TALENT. I am going strength over weakness. I would rather have a strength and a weakness as have balance. I am going player over position, as Snead says.

    alyoshamucci, is good at his ratings. imo Me, I just do the top pick or two. I haven’t looked at the draft this year. My general feeling is that I want to get bigger on the defensive line and add a CB. I am looking for WRs that catch the ball.

    Agamemnon

    January 3, 2017 at 7:24 pm #62336
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    For me. I am high on Pat Elflien C Ohio State. Dump Tim Barnes and upgrade the Center position. Move GRob to LG, cut Saffold, bring in Will Beatty, 2 years at $3.5 million to play LT. Draft a kid in the late rounds like, Jordan Morgan OT from The Kutztown University in the late rounds to groom for the LT position.

    January 3, 2017 at 7:27 pm #62337
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator
    zn wrote:
    InvaderRam wrote:

    o the dline is supposed to be the strength of this team and we’re hoping to draft 2 defensive ends.

    Well IMO the DL won’t be the strength of the team UNLESS they draft 2 ends.

    Quinn has been hurt for 2 consecutive seasons now, and Hayes is up there and not that productive. They need a rotation at both DE spots.

    OR teams just double/triple Donald and there’s no defense.

    I think they can get things out of this offense without pouring in a ton of resources.

    But they won’t win if they let the defense slide while trying to get a top offense. That would just be gray area hell.

    ..

    well what would be the strength without the defensive ends?

    January 3, 2017 at 7:52 pm #62342
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    well what would be the strength without the defensive ends?

    Special Teams.

    Agamemnon

    January 3, 2017 at 7:56 pm #62343
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator
    Agamemnon wrote:

    well what would be the strength without the defensive ends?

    Special Teams.

    …

    …

    yikes i tell ya. yikes!

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.