Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › This could definitely be the best defense in NFL in 2015
- This topic has 18 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by PA Ram.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 4, 2015 at 4:48 pm #25832znModerator
Rambill found this
===========
Andy Benoit @Andy_Benoit
Am at #Rams practice right now. This could definitely be the best defense in NFL in 2015.
Andy Benoit: NFL analyst for Sports Illustrated & @theMMQB
———-
Just had a blast watching film with #Rams DT Aaron Donald. He’s as good at explaining the game as he is playing it.——–
@Andy_Benoit think the secondary can hold up? I feel like that has been their achilles heel. That and poor LB play.Benoit: Young group that improved drastically last yr down stretch.
———-
@Andy_Benoit how do you like McLeod? Better than given credit for IMO. Always pointed figure on big playsBenoit: I agree. McDonald is the Safety I’m in love with, though.
———-Kenny Britt just caught a bomb and bowled the ball hard at S Cody Davis. Davis then threw ball 40 yds back hitting Britt perfectly. All fun
June 4, 2015 at 6:51 pm #25839InvaderRamModeratora lot of things have to happen before this defense can be the best in the nfl.
but i find comfort in that i think the things that have to happen can happen.
but they also might not happen.
i gotta say. i went back and looked at some games from last season. didn’t realize how good mcdonald looked at times. there were game where he was just all over the place flying around. i’m encouraged.
June 5, 2015 at 4:18 pm #25887WinnbradParticipantDepends on the offense. If they can move the chains, and avg just a few more points per game, then sure, this D could be one of the best.
But they won’t be the best. They’re not that good.
If Foles plays well, the WRs step up, Quick stays healthy, Bailey gets his head out of his ass and doesn’t get suspended, and the running game is decent, and they don’t turn the ball over, then ok, we’ve got ourselves a Defense. 🙂
June 5, 2015 at 4:38 pm #25888wvParticipantDepends on the offense. If they can move the chains, and avg just a few more points per game, then sure, this D could be one of the best.
But they won’t be the best. They’re not that good.
If Foles plays well, the WRs step up, Quick stays healthy, Bailey gets his head out of his ass and doesn’t get suspended, and the running game is decent, and they don’t turn the ball over, then ok, we’ve got ourselves a Defense.
I think the D could be top five
or even number 1. Its not unreasonable
to think that could happen.The offense though? — it could be… 31, 23, 17, 11….
w
vJune 5, 2015 at 5:14 pm #25889rflParticipantI know I’m tiresome on all of this, but last year SHOULD teach us a lesson. Honestly. It should.
This group vacillated wildly last year. It started out inept. Improved, then played lights out, then faded again.
What do we learn from this? Two things.
One: they have the potential to be elite, perhaps historically good. Very few defenses have a ceiling high enough to play as they did for 2 games last year.
Two: they have a long way to go to overcome the ill discipline that have frequently led to pathetic performances. They have rarely lived up to all that potential.
This means that this group could end up anywhere on a continuum from 1st to, say, 18th or so. The results depend on a number of variables. I don’t see how any observer could at this point say much about where on that continuum we’ll end up.
By the way, while I agree that the offense has a part to play, I don’t feel it’s crucial. Truly great defenses don’t need all that much help from their offenses to reach the Top Five.
By virtue of the absurd ...
June 5, 2015 at 6:07 pm #25894bnwBlockedThey owned the Raiders last year. Who didn’t? Didn’t we learn Manning was injured going into that game in St. Louis? So that wasn’t a real test. They beat a sleepwalking Seahawks team and Carroll will not make that mistake against Fisher again. They stunk it up against the Chargers when it really mattered at the end and lost. They were embarrassed by AZ to put an early nail in the Rams seasons coffin. This defense has not shown itself to be great. They generally bottom feed and while that is necessary to win they come up short against good teams far too often which makes them a sub .500 team (and ready for it the PR song that remains the same) with promise. With promise again in 2016 and each year after.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
June 5, 2015 at 6:10 pm #25895znModeratorThe offense though? — it could be… 31, 23, 17, 11….
Well, an offense ranked 31,231,711 out of 32 would NOT be good.
June 5, 2015 at 6:16 pm #25896bnwBlockedJune 5, 2015 at 6:43 pm #25902ZooeyModeratorJune 5, 2015 at 6:58 pm #25906znModeratorThis means that this group could end up anywhere on a continuum from 1st to, say, 18th or so. The results depend on a number of variables. I don’t see how any observer could at this point say much about where on that continuum we’ll end up.
But then, how many of us (fans in general) have ever predicted anything?
That is, when a team takes a leap forward, what does it look like the year before?
What you’re saying is that they did not look cohesive or disciplined. I saw it differently. I saw them struggling with mental errors. That may sound like the same thing, but you can fix mental errors by learning the thing better.
Of all the problems to have, I’ll take “still struggling to grasp the defense.” Cause that can be fixed with time.
That would never have helped the 2008 defense. It wouldn’t have mattered how much time they had.
June 5, 2015 at 7:38 pm #25912rflParticipantI saw it differently. I saw them struggling with mental errors. That may sound like the same thing, but you can fix mental errors by learning the thing better.
Of all the problems to have, I’ll take “still struggling to grasp the defense.” Cause that can be fixed with time.
Well, I guess a key difference in our perspectives is what we consider to be an acceptable learning curve.
In my view, it’s virtually impossible to reconcile a “they were still learning” frame to last year. Even if one could accept the “slow start” (a damn long slow start), the regression in the NYG game seems pretty tough to fit with that read.
I would also argue that the bad days last year were about far more than mistakes. One of the very best pass rushes in the league was held to a historically low number of sacks for, what, a quarter of the season? More? How is that a matter of simply making mistakes while learning? As someone wrote last year during the sack drought, “how is that even possible?” I do not see how a DC can possibly escape holding some substantive responsibility for failing to get sacks out of a proven high-sack D-front while using his patented high-blitz attack. I just don’t get that.
In any event, even if one said “they were making mistakes while learning,” there is no way to project last year’s performance safely into an elite performance. It was far too long lasting, too erratic, too untrustworthy to trust to be any better than middle of the pack. Can we really trust the DBs? Can we trust ‘Tree, who has twice started the season slowly?
I have no idea what these guys will do. They won’t be a bad defense, at least not every week. But how good they are is, I would argue, unknowable.
By virtue of the absurd ...
June 5, 2015 at 11:09 pm #25924znModeratorIn my view, it’s virtually impossible to reconcile a “they were still learning” frame to last year. Even if one could accept the “slow start” (a damn long slow start), the regression in the NYG game seems pretty tough to fit with that read.
Yeah, agreed, I don’t see it that way. And teams can be inconsistent until they master what they’re supposed to do, so the inconsistency of the Giants game doesn’t bother me. Plus the Giants game had its own boneheaded errors, including the D losing its cool.
I don’t worry about the first games without sacks. Here’s what I thought I saw happening. The offenses were getting the ball off quickly, negating the rush, so they had to counter that by playing a containment game with the receivers on short routes. In fact I have never seen Rams safeties be so good at that when they got it going. But then, to do that, and also control big plays, they needed superior communication in the secondary, because essentially they were hovering over a short passing game while having to keep an eye out for anything more dangerous than that. And, the recognition and communication were not always there to accomplish that. That, to me, is where most of the mistakes came from.
I think if you subtract the really bad mental errors that led to TDs, they win 2-3 more games.
Also, to me it’s perfectly natural that they would not have it together at first—Wms has put together top 5 (and even #1) defenses before, but not as a coordinator under the new CBA, which limits practice time. Plus the team itself keeps saying they took a while to learn it. I think part of it is that Fisher gave Wms free reign for a bit and they went all high tech, but then he asked them to simplify it, and that took immediate hold and they went to another level.
Anyway, yeah, I am projecting last year’s performance into a top D this year, just not safely—because anything could happen. Heck before 2011 the word was that the D improved enough to expect another step up, but then some of us argued they were too vulnerable to injuries. We must have jinxed them because they put 10 CBs on IR.
In any even, I don’t see the harm in high expectations. I’ve done it before, been wrong, and lived through it. I am not the type who has to temper the fun of enthusiastic early projections. If they stumble for clear reasons (like injuries, or lack of heart, or whatever it is) I just see the reality and quickly adjust, which means flipping to “look for the bright spots” mode.
Anyway, there are coordinators in the league who have less going for them than Williams who could make a defense out of the combination of Donald, Quinn, McDonald, and Gaines, plus the more solid anchor guys like LOng, JL, and McCleod.
June 6, 2015 at 11:01 am #25945HramParticipantThey have some serious young talent due to the extra picks from the RG3 trade and added to it this year with the cap savings from the Bradford trade. Plus, none of them are rookies and the coordinator is going into his second year with the team.
Provided the offense can be close to average and they don’t suffer an undue amount of injuries, they should be a top 5 defense. Anything else would be disappointing.
June 6, 2015 at 11:24 am #25946InvaderRamModeratorthey’ve changed defensive coordinators every year since fisher has been here. they started four rookies or sophomores in donald, ogletree, mcdonald, and gaines. jenkins, johnson, mcleod, and brockers were all third year players. so i remain optimistic. especially with williams coming back.
June 6, 2015 at 1:39 pm #25954HerzogParticipantFisher has to reign Williams in the way Vermeil did with Martz.
Jenkins has to stop being Jenkins.
THAN I think we might have something.
June 6, 2015 at 2:06 pm #25955wvParticipantFisher has to reign Williams in the way Vermeil did with Martz.
Jenkins has to stop being Jenkins.
THAN I think we might have something.This is gonna be the Rams best year
in a decade.The pieces are in place.
w
v
June 6, 2015 at 4:35 pm #25957InvaderRamModeratorhttp://www.turfshowtimes.com/2015/5/29/8656893/2014-darta-a-good-sign-for-the-2015-st-louis-rams
A Top-Five Defense
The Rams gave up 354 points (22.1 ppg.) in the 2014 regular season. That put them in a tie for 16th in the NFL, an average result for the Rams defensively (at least on the surface). In reality, the Rams’ defense was much better than the rankings suggest. Total points allowed can be deceiving when determining the quality of a teams’ defense, especially if that team has an extremely high total of DARTA in a particular season. In the Rams’ case, the defense gave up only 284 points (17.8 ppg.) in 2014, putting them in the top half-dozen teams in the league in points allowed (when adjusted for DARTA). The Rams’ defense simply wasn’t on the field when the other 70 points were scored.
Five reasons the Rams’ defense should be even better in 2015:
Chris Long should be healthy and not miss a substantial part of the season.
Mark Barron will be with the Rams for the entire season.
The Rams didn’t lose a single starter from 2014 during the offseason.
The team added two quality, experienced players (Akeem Ayers and Nick Fairley) in Free Agency. Both should have a positive impact on the defense.
The unit now has an entire season under its collective belt in a Gregg Williams-led defense.June 6, 2015 at 11:29 pm #25970AgamemnonParticipantJune 7, 2015 at 8:31 am #25978PA RamParticipantOkay–I HOPE this is the best defense in the NFL. They could be. Maybe. But I get a sense that Andy Benoit is getting excited watching the defense take some practice snaps against one of the WORST offenses in the league–a changing one at that, and making proclamations they may not be able to live up to.
I don’t think anyone doubts the Rams have some real talent on defense. There is absolutely the potential to be the best.
But they also have some weak spots.
I’m not sure at all that the linebackers are an elite group.
I believe the secondary could be REALLY good this year but let’s face it–this defense starts with the line. If they aren’t getting pressure it’s a problem. And teams love to use quick hitters on the Rams and we’ve seen that be effective. Also–occasionally the Rams have had trouble with stopping the run.
If you have one elite unit the other teams can coach around that.
The Rams have one elite unit right now.
They HAVE to dominate.
If they do that then yes–this defense can be special. There may not be another team with the defensive line to compare to the Rams–but if they have better overall balance it may not matter. As a whole, they could outperform this defense.
So yes–the Rams COULD have the best defense in the NFL this year.
And either way I’m sure it’s going to be a good, solid defense.
But for now, I’ll hold off on those lofty expectations. I do know that part of this is really with the offense. If the Rams run a ball control offense that keeps the ball away from the other team, it’s the best defense of all. That will raise the defensive stats in terms of yards allowed without the defense ever stepping on the field.
But we’ll see.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.