Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 241 through 270 (of 379 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New England … praise and blame #17095
    sdram
    Participant

    I think Belicheck should atone for the ‘cheatriot’ ways – torture, embarrassment, incarceration, forfeiture of all personal assets, shame, agony, and misery. Or, maybe they could make him listen to somebody recite Emily Dickinson poetry for a couple hours.

    He’s a really good coach – who I think is easy to vilianize. He’s easy to despise. And, he has 12 balls.

    in reply to: happy birthday Ramsmaineiac #17094
    sdram
    Participant

    Happy Birthday you mainieac

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams have options to create cap space #16798
    sdram
    Participant

    Oh I wasn’t aiming anything at you. People should always post whatever reading material they want. The poster is not responsible for what it says…the author is. I have posted plenty of things I didn’t agree with in the least, but it’s news, it’s buzz, it’s discussion fodder, it’s about the Rams.

    So I was not arguing with you. I think it’s absolutely wrong to go off on a poster for an article he posts. THat used to happen on the old unmoderated huddle and it led to ugly, ugly, ugly posts. “You believe THAT shit? You’re such a tool.” (I am not exaggerating.) Nor is it even right to assume that people post things cause they have agendas. They post things cause we post things. The more the merrier.

    So I go off on bleacher’s report stuff about the cap because they are really BAD at analyzing the cap.

    You are not supposed to take that as aimed at you. It would be wrong to aim it at you.

    It’s the same thing when I post Miklasz, and half the posters go after Miklasz. That doesn’t mean they’re going after me for posting him.

    Fair enough? s

    Truly ZN, no issues here with me or on my end.I didn’t think you were aiming angst or anything else at me. I just love it when you get riled up about stuff – you’re one sexy ram fan that way. I can see your juices flowing.

    If you can stomach that whole article, even the blogger guy understated the Rams FA signing potential towards the end. For me, I was focusing on the dollars and cents part of it.

    Now, I get to paint the dining room ceiling. I’d rather get all my teeth pulled than embark on painting the house. But, as they say a painted house starts with the wife bitching about it for six months first.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams have options to create cap space #16792
    sdram
    Participant

    I didn’t really like the options of that “hit me” questionnaire for Bradford either. Seemed like they were missing the most realistic option. But, really it’s just fodder for discussion. It seemed to trip your trigger a bit. I was just trying to contribute something regarding where the Rams currently are in terms of cap space. I doubt they’ll go “nuts” in fA either. Unless I missed it, this blog doesn’t say where they actually are right now but it covers some of the numbers at this point with respect to their space situation and where they could make some room if Snisher decides to go all in. I assume that they’re currently right about at the cap.

    “I mean after a certain point, you have to learn your lesson. If we go with this guys scenario and cut 3 FAs–Long, Wells, Langford–what does that tell you about FAs???!!!” FA’s are like boats – the happiest day of a boat owners life are the day you buy and the day you sell.

    I’m thinking it’s pretty much a foregone conclusion that Long, Wells are done in St Louis. I’m leaning toward Langford being gone as well. That’s how I’m seeing it. Will they go after a top interior FA? Who knows at this point. Will they go after multiple high priced signees – yeah, I doubt that too. But, who knows. I think they’ll be prudent – sign some of their guys coming up next year, try to fill their holes, sign a guy or two with the money they save with their cuts.

    As far as Sam B goes, I could see some sort of a short term extension playing out for him. Seems to me that it makes sense for the Rams and to a degree for him to do this. As far as extending Sam or cutting for space because of his injury question marks, I think so did Jake Long and Scott Wells when Snisher signed them. Looking at the list of possible FA QB’s or even draftees is depressing. Decent FA QB’s with his talent, even with injury concerns are hard to find. I doubt he’s going anywhere this year regardless of an extension or not.

    I’m not quite sure what to think about Langford. But I do agree with the premise that the Rams might be better suited using a potential cap savings from him to resign some of their younger guys that are coming up in 2016 which means they won’t have his money available for any type of splash. But, who knows maybe he loves him some Jeff Fisher and Jeff Fisher loves him as well. Or maybe his agent sits him down and tells him that the best deal he could get right now is to redo his deal with the Rams – like you said, lots of scenarios for each of these guys and the Rams FA situation.

    Anyway – there looks to be a decent list of interior OL talent and WR talent available in FA this off-season. It’s expensive. What will the Rams do?

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams have options to create cap space #16789
    sdram
    Participant

    Wonder how much money the Rams will have for FA signees? They have a lot of young guys of their own to consider as well.

    This article at least gives some sort of idea about their money issues.

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2321354-what-can-st-louis-rams-do-to-clear-more-salary-cap-space-for-2015-offseason

    With the 2015 offseason approaching, many are wondering if the St. Louis Rams will have the necessary salary-cap space to partake in the ferocious bidding wars for veteran players.

    Sites such as Spotrac provide a nice overview, but salary-cap management is deeper and more complex than many believe. This article won’t pretend to understand the subtle loopholes and footnotes that few have access to, but we can still examine the surface and gain a solid understanding of where the Rams stand this offseason.

    Simply put, the money is there if the Rams want it. Setting aside funds to sign the 2015 draft picks and re-sign key in-house free agents (Kenny Britt, Joe Barksdale) will push the cap number close to the limit, but there are a number of veteran cuts to be made, and that will allow the money to flow.

    If the Rams part with these veterans as expected, the team will have the freedom to make a splash in free agency.

    QB Sam Bradford

    This is the big one. Fans are eagerly awaiting the fate of quarterback Sam Bradford, as the outcome of his contract will have the biggest impact on what the Rams can do in free agency.

    What will happen to Bradford?
    Rams cut him and move on. Rams cut him but re-sign him at cheaper rate. Rams keep him at current price. Trade bait. Submit Vote vote to see results

    Bradford has a $16.58 million cap hit in 2015, and the Rams can save nearly $13 million in cap space by cutting the veteran.

    In 2014, Bradford suffered his second season-ending injury in as many years. The Rams were stuck with Bradford’s $17.61 million cap hit this past season despite the fact that he didn’t play a single down. With another large cap number in 2015, the Rams cannot risk being burned again, so there’s virtually zero chance that Bradford is retained at his current rate.

    With $13 million dollars in cap relief, St. Louis can pursue a high-end free agent on the offensive line—Stefen Wisniewski or Mike Iupati—and retain Bradford at a more team-friendly number.

    Elite centers and guards average around $8 million per year. Subtract that from the $13 million figure, and there’s still $5 million remaining—which is a good cap number for Bradford in 2015.

    A two-year deal at around $15 million (of course, loaded with incentives and non-guaranteed money) sounds about right for Bradford. That will significantly lower his 2015 cap hit and allow the Rams to pursue a good lineman, which will also help keep Bradford healthy.

    Cap Savings: $12.9 Million

    Jeff Haynes/Associated Press

    T Jake Long

    Jake Long was signed by the Rams in 2013, and the team was well aware of his injury history, which is why it inked him to a very team-friendly deal.

    Long’s contract is a four-year deal for $34 million, but only $12 million of that amount is guaranteed. The 2015 cap hit is $10.5 million. But St. Louis is only on the hook for another $2.5 million, so the Rams can save a cool $8 million by cutting Long.

    Long suffered a season-ending knee injury in 2014, per Nick Wagoner of ESPN.com, and it’s his second major knee injury in two years with St. Louis.

    The Rams used the No. 2 overall pick in 2014 to draft monster Auburn tackle Greg Robinson, who took over at left tackle and played well following Long’s departure. With the future left tackle in place, there’s no chance that Long returns at his current rate.

    In fact, considering the severity of his latest knee injury combined with his overall struggle with injuries at the NFL level, it’d be wise for Long to call it quits and hang up the cleats. Any more bodily damage could have serious long-term implications, and it might even be too late already.

    The $8 million in cap savings will allow the Rams to pursue a free-agent offensive lineman of equal or greater value.

    Cap Savings: $8 Million

    Elaine Thompson/Associated Press

    C Scott Wells

    Scott Wells was a major weak point on the offensive line this season. His run blocking was weak, and defenders were able to immediately create pressure in the middle during pass protection. Not to mention, he had numerous bad snaps that absolutely killed the offense’s momentum.

    To be fair, Wells spent time in the intensive care unit this past summer with a bacterial infection, according to Jim Thomas of STLtoday.com, and the difficult road to recovery had him ill-prepared for the intensity of training camp. Physically, he was playing catch-up all season long.

    As unfortunate as that may be, Wells has been an underwhelming presence since joining the team in 2012, so the decline also has a lot to do with his age (33) and on-the-field injuries (he missed 13 starts in his first two seasons with the Rams).

    Jeff Fisher prefers to have a veteran at center, so it would not be a total shock if the Rams retain Wells. His character is off-the-charts, and he’s a solid locker room presence. So he’s not the easiest player to let go.

    Having said that, the interior offensive line was dreadful this past season, and football is a business. There has to be a superior option available, and it’s the Rams’ duty to put emotions aside and make the best move for the team.

    Wells’ 2015 cap hit is just $4.75 million and only $1 million of that is guaranteed, so that’s a nice $3.75 million in extra spending money if Wells is cut loose.

    It’s not a huge sum, but combined with the savings from Bradford and Long, it will put the Rams in a position to make a serious run at Wisniewski or Iupati (assuming their current teams don’t re-sign them). It will help the Rams toward retaining some in-house free agents as well.

    Total Savings: $3.75 Million

    DT Kendall Langford

    Kendall Langford has been a reliable starter on the inside since joining the team in 2012, but the emergence of Pro Bowl rookie Aaron Donald, as well as three-year veteran Michael Brockers, has forced Langford into a backup role.

    That’s not a bad thing. When a reliable player of Langford’s caliber is struggling to get reps, it’s a sign that the depth has significantly improved for the Rams. But since Langford still carries a starter’s price tag, there must be an appropriate response.

    Langford is due a sizable $7 million cap hit in 2015, but since he’s guaranteed just another $1 million, St. Louis can save $6 million total by cutting him.

    Fisher and defensive coordinator Gregg Williams both cherish elite defensive line play and understand the importance of having depth at the position. With that in mind, there’s still a solid chance that Langford will return in 2015 at his current rate.

    However, there are talented young defensive linemen struggling to get on the field, such as Ethan Westbrooks, so the the departure of Langford could give those guys an opportunity.

    Also, the Rams frequently move their defensive ends inside. Robert Quinn, Chris Long, William Hayes and Eugene Sims all have experience on the interior line, and all four are capable of providing depth at tackle behind Donald and Brockers.

    The Rams will attempt to re-sign Langford at a reduced rate. If he agrees, that’s excellent, but it’s not likely. He’s a capable starter, and his only role in St. Louis is as a backup. Surely, there are several needy teams willing to pay him starter’s money, and it’d be hard to blame him for walking.

    So, Mr. Westbrooks, welcome to the show.

    Cap Savings: $6 Million

    Total Savings: $30.65 Million

    Scott Eklund/Associated Press

    The Rams are capable of making a splash in free agency this offseason, but it will take a few heartfelt goodbyes and some tough decisions.

    If the four mentioned players are cut loose prior to free agency, it’ll be a telltale sign that St. Louis will be making headlines with its free-agent signings.

    After setting aside money for draft picks and re-signing some key players, there will still be money leftover from these cuts to pursue some big names. The total savings from cutting the above players adds up to $30.65 million (about 23 percent of the $133 million total salary cap from 2014).

    The Rams are not in a position to go on a mindless spending spree. Several young centerpieces will have to be re-signed sooner rather than later (Brockers, Janoris Jenkins, Alec Ogletree, Trumaine Johnson), so that’s something to keep in mind as well.

    Even so, there’s no reason why the Rams can’t reel in one or two big names in free agency this year. After all, the money has to be spent somewhere, so it might as well go toward filling some glaring needs.

    Note: All player contract information in this article is from Spotrac.com

    in reply to: who the free agents will be #18018
    sdram
    Participant

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000468197/article/ndamukong-suh-leads-top-25-free-agents-for-2015

    It’s merely the first week of the offseason process. Franchise tags have yet to be discussed. There’s still time for clubs to lock up young stars to long-term contracts. Many of the top free agents will never get the opportunity to test their value on the open market. We will compile a top 100 list and provide a breakdown of each position in early March.

    Our list places the highest value on ascendant players with little or no reason to expect a dropoff in production over the next few years.

    To view the upcoming free agents by team, position and restricted free agents, click the tabs above.

    Without further ado, here are Around The NFL’s top 25 NFL free agents for 2015:

    1. Ndamukong Suh, Detroit Lions defensive tackle
    2. Justin Houston, Kansas City Chiefs pass rusher
    3. Dez Bryant, Dallas Cowboys wide receiver
    4. Demaryius Thomas, Denver Broncos wide receiver
    5. Jason Pierre-Paul, New York Giants defensive end
    6. Julius Thomas, Denver Broncos tight end
    7. Mike Iupati, San Francisco 49ers guard
    8. Randall Cobb, Green Bay Packers wide receiver
    9. Devin McCourty, New England Patriots safety
    10. DeMarco Murray, Dallas Cowboys running back
    11. Jerry Hughes, Buffalo Bills pass rusher
    12. Jason Worilds, Pittsburgh Steelers pass rusher
    13. Jared Odrick, Miami Dolphins defensive tackle
    14. Pernell McPhee, Baltimore Ravens pass rusher
    15. Terrance Knighton, Denver Broncos defensive tackle
    16. Jeremy Maclin, Philadelphia Eagles wide receiver
    17. Brandon Graham, Philadelphia Eagles pass rusher
    18. Torrey Smith, Baltimore Ravens wide receiver
    19. Greg Hardy, Carolina Panthers pass rusher*
    20. Byron Maxwell, Seattle Seahawks cornerback
    21. C.J. Spiller, Buffalo Bills running back
    22. Nick Fairley, Detroit Lions defensive tackle
    23. Brandon Flowers, San Diego Chargers cornerback
    24. Brian Orakpo, Washington Redskins pass rusher
    25. Jordan Cameron, Cleveland Browns tight end

    * Hardy currently is on the Commissioner’s Exempt List

    sdram
    Participant

    If the L.A. proposal was just a negotiating tactic, that would likely be the cruelest joke of all … on St. Louis and Los Angeles.

    I agree with this. So, question remains what does Stan want?

    I’d say that the big difference in the proposals from my perspective is Stan will own the whole shebang in LA. Would he give that up for the deal in St Louis?

    sdram
    Participant

    Martz and Rex? That could be entertaining.

    I loved Martz with St Louis but it seems that MM had a hard time not being in charge and taking direction from the head coach after he left the Rams. He tried to make Joey Harrington into Warner as I recall – put a lot of effort into it which I respect him for. It would be nice to hear what the current coaches think of him. So many talking heads just plain hated him when he was still working it seemed.

    sdram
    Participant

    Yes, he’s got a lot of bravado and just plain bullshit about him. But, the players love him from what I understand. And, he’s a good defensive coach.

    So, it appears he’s going to pair with Trestman from the accounts floating around – that might be a really good combination for Buffalo. Their personnel is not that bad – need a QB either from within or without. And, it’s telling for me that he didn’t throw the ex-jet GM under the bus, at least publicly. Anyway, I’m just happy his defensive schemes didn’t follow him to SF.

    in reply to: Dick Lebeau out as Steelers DC #16235
    sdram
    Participant

    Can defensive coordinators get into the hall of fame? that’s one heck of a record.

    Sure, but he’s already there from his playing days.

    in reply to: Anyone giving Seattle a chance over Carolina? #16066
    sdram
    Participant

    How do you call it? I usually take the home teams in the div round.

    Carolina at Seattle – 6 to 20 –
    Dallas at Green Bay – 27 to 24 – Dallas has played well on the road this year so big upset in GB. I hate Dallas.

    Baltimore at New England – 23 – 19 – Baltimore does it again. I hate New England
    Indianapolis at Denver – 27 to 24 – Luck isn’t on Peyton’s side.

    Course I could be 100% wrong with all these picks.

    sdram
    Participant

    The statement from the Rams today established their position on the “reasonable negotiations” portion of the NFL requirement. In court, they would argue, “Too little, too late.” And I think there is no chance that St. Lou can sweeten the pot at this point. I don’t think this is a leverage ploy. I think it was over a year or two ago.

    There are still a lot of ways this thing can unfold. There are still the Jaguars, the Broncos, the Chargers, the Raiders, and who knows who else who may enter into this before it is over, but one thing I’m pretty sure of at this point is that the Rams are not going to play in Peacock’s stadium under Kroenke’s ownership.

    Yes, I agree with this. For me, it’s always been about “what exactly does Stan want.” And, with Kroenke’s private nature I really wonder did these announcements regarding the land purchase and partnership in Inglewood even need to be made? I’m not sure but couldn’t at least the partnership have been kept private if they had wanted that? So, beyond stirring up the football fans in LA and St Louis I’m thinking the announcement had at least a legal purpose and the “reasonable negotiations” theme checks that box.

    Who knows – I’m sure there are a myriad of aspects and details with all of this that we – Joe Ram Fan – are not privy to. So, for this week Stan is getting what was deemed by the Governor as the no bidding war offer which I would think is Missouri’s best and final offer to keep the Rams? I kind of doubt there’s no back and fourth regarding this proposal if Stan actually wants to try to make St Louis work. We’ll just see what happens – I’m still hedging my bets. I think Zooey laid out the timetable earlier really well.

    I watched from afar when the Vikings and Minnesota\Minneapolis did something similar but Wilf didn’t have land in Inglewood or a partnership to develop a sports complex in place so there was never a clear path to LA – just innuendo. Stan has a clear path. It has a few bends but if he wants to be there, there’s almost no stopping him at this point. So, again What does Stan want? The actions and announcements this past year seem to speak clearly and distinctly as to what his intentions are.

    Playoff football today – wish the Rams were contenders.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 11 months ago by sdram.
    sdram
    Participant

    I have no idea bout offensive coordinators. Whatever the Rams do they gotta have a solid OL or the rest is just gonna suffer it seems.

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15813
    sdram
    Participant

    Did I miss anything?

    vinegar chicken – try it sometime. It’s pretty decent, cheap and easy to make. http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/recipes/laura-calder/chicken-in-vinegar.html

    Maybe the Rams will move to France? Les Mouflons, no? Crazy shit this moving, not moving – I can relate kind of.

    I feel bad for fans that teams come and go but like about everybody don’t want my team to be one of them. I was a Ram fan as a kid in LA, then I moved to SD and so they’ve been close enough for me to drive there in a day – it’s a shitty long drive but I can do it. If they moved to Paris, I’d still root for those froggy fucks.

    in reply to: Bengals/Colts, Dallas/Lions #15520
    sdram
    Participant

    Amazed = Jerry has deep pockets.

    in reply to: Cards vs Panthers #15474
    sdram
    Participant

    Watching the Cards today reminded me of the futility I felt watching the Rams offense at times this year.

    Still, I’m not sure that Davis or Hill were ever as bad as Lindley today.

    while they had their moments, I agree that Lindley looked really bad today.

    in reply to: Free Agent QBs #15473
    sdram
    Participant

    Uhhh, never mind on Lindley. His tires are already wobbling.

    in reply to: Free Agent QBs #15448
    sdram
    Participant

    It’s pretty tough. I think they should kick the tires on Lindley – he’s young but I would say he has a chance at having some upside. I’m not sure if they can do that without committing to him to some degree in the form of backup money.

    For me, Locker is intriguing but he has an injury riddled resume similar to Bradford’s.

    I’ve seen enough of Ponder to know that his Joe Kapp impression isn’t going so well but he can throw the ball a few yards farther than Joe. Not making excuses but Joe is 76 now so his arm ain’t what it used to be.

    in reply to: Offensive Line #15285
    sdram
    Participant

    At this point, I would rather have Long’s cap space than Long.

    His cap hit is 10.5 M. They would eat 2.5 M in dead money if they cut him or he retired, and that would mean 8 M in savings.

    If he stays on the team with the same money, he has the 4th highest cap number.

    Yeah, I gotta think that between the Long list of injuries and the huge cap hit, that Long is gone.

    I would think it’s a Long shot(pun intended) but perhaps he he could be resigned for something more cap friendly to fill one of the other OL holes. But, it makes more sense to go younger or to take the money saved from Long and sign a viable veteran FA(s) to play LG, Center, and\or RT if they need to replace Barksdale.

    in reply to: Breaking Rams News #15270
    sdram
    Participant

    I watched Mel Gordon, Mariotta, and Winston today and tonight. Winston kind of reminds me of McNair how he sets up and delivers the ball. McNair sat on the bench for a few season’s didn’t he? None of them made me drool. And, it was only parts of one game for each. I’d watched Mariotta a couple of times this season and still haven’t seen what the big deal is with him – probably because he doesn’t run a pro-style O where he sets up in the pocket and like I said, I didn’t see the whole game whenever I did watch Oregon.

    in reply to: scouting the college qbs in January games #15264
    sdram
    Participant

    Mariotta hands off nicely.

    in reply to: Breaking Rams News #15263
    sdram
    Participant

    I need to read other threads before posting. The gist of this “breaking news” had been posted already in the recent OL thread.

    Feel free to move this there if deemed appropriate.

    Or, we could turn it into a thread about the personal lives of Ram players or even better 2015 NFL draft OT rankings as of December 6th.

    1. Brandon Scherff | 6’5, 320 pounds | OT | Iowa
    2. La’el Collins | 6’5, 321 pounds | OT | LSU *
    3. Cedric Ogbuehi | 6’5, 305 pounds | OT | Texas A&M
    4. T.J. Clemming | 6’6, 315 pounds | OT | Pittsburgh
    5. Andrus Peat | 6’7, 316 pounds | OT | Stanford *
    6. Spencer Drango | 6’6, 305 pounds | OT | Baylor *
    7. Ereck Flowers | 6’6, 324 pounds | OT | Miami *
    8. Daryl Williams | 6’6, 329 pounds | OT | Oklahoma
    9. Ty Sambrailo | 6’5, 315 pounds | OT | Colorado State
    10. Tyrus Thompson | 6’5, 336 pounds | OT | Oklahoma
    11. Sean Hickey | 6’6, 306 pounds | OT | Syracuse
    12. Jake Fisher | 6’6, 300 pounds | OT | Oregon
    13. Cameron Erving | 6’6, 308 pounds | OT | Florida State
    14. Terry Poole | 6’5, 310 pounds | OT | San Diego State
    15. Jeremiah Poutasi | 6’6, 330 pounds | OT | Utah *
    16. Eric Lefeld | 6’6, 309 pounds | OT | Cincinnati
    17. Corey Robinson | 6’8 344 pounds | OT | South Carolina
    18. Rob Havenstein | 6’8, 344 pounds | OT | Wisconsin
    19. Chaz Green | 6’5, 300 pounds | OT | Florida
    20. Darrian Miller | 6’5, 292 pounds | OT | Kentucky
    21. Brett Boyko | 6’7, 310 pounds | OT | UNLV
    22. Brey Cook | 6’7, 314 pounds | OT | Arkansas
    23. Austin Shepherd | 6’5, 320 pounds | OT | Alabama

    sdram
    Participant

    My optimism will grow as the next season gets closer and after they attempt to plug their holes. So, at this particular instance in time I’m looking forward to their offseason, draft, etc…

    in reply to: Thank-you Eric Allen #15194
    sdram
    Participant

    He’s one of the few taking heads I will listen to – down to earth, matter of fact, Joe Friday type.

    in reply to: Number 8 pick ? #14852
    sdram
    Participant

    i think the Rams moved up-down to the 10th slot with their loss today and Minnesota and the Saints both won.

    Not much different from 12 but it’ll come in handy in a few months.

    in reply to: from the leaked Patriots scouting report on Manziel #14840
    sdram
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>sdram wrote:</div>
    I thought I read this last spring before or around the draft? The NFL is the big boy league. It’s looking like Johnnie ain’t gonna get a chance unless he truly shows signs he’s growing on the inside.

    Yeah, but who would you pick
    in a celebrity, reality-show, steel cage match:
    Tebow or Manziel ?

    w
    v

    I’d have to go with T&T from what I’ve seen so far. If nothing else, he’s a tough sob.

    So, we bought both of our four year old grandsons little itty bitty baby Ram uniforms and helmets for Christmas. One of them thought it was the Old Miss colors – he lives in Mississippi just outside of Memphis. The other one kind of liked it but preferred to play with the 50 shot nerf dart gun his dad bought him. So, it goes to show you – something about something.

    in reply to: from the leaked Patriots scouting report on Manziel #14823
    sdram
    Participant

    I thought I read this last spring before or around the draft? The NFL is the big boy league. It’s looking like Johnnie ain’t gonna get a chance unless he truly shows signs he’s growing on the inside.

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat Seattle? #14723
    sdram
    Participant

    Rams offensive line has to play well – offensively. If Rams can move the ball, score some points, not turn the ball over then the whole game won’t be on the defense to win or lose it.

    sdram
    Participant

    I had the same experience. The only radio we had until I was 12 was the family car radio so I’d sit in my parents 66 BelAire station wagon and listen to the game. They bought me a radio for Christmas when I was 12 and I wore that thing out listening to the Dodgers, Angels, Rams and Lakers in the late sixties and early seventies. Gawd how I loved to listen to Enberg, Vinny, Jerry Dogget, and Chicky Baby.

    in reply to: What's your "bet"? (feeling) (analysis)–Rams beat Giants? #14338
    sdram
    Participant

    I’m picking the Giants cause I haven’t been right about the Rams much this season. So, if I pick the Rams, the god of fate will intervene yet again and the Giants will win. Cause, it’s all about who I pick. Nothing else really matters.

    The Rams will probably score a touchdown or two this week. I read that Coughlin is likely to return as the GMen’s coach if he wants to. I hope it’s an entertaining game – The giants seem kind of jeckly and hydey to me.

    I caught the last five minutes in the fourth and the overtime tonight of the 9ers-chargers game. Nice to see the 9ers crumbling into dust. Kept thinking where would the Rams be if they had won that charger game and one of a few others they pissed away earlier – they’d be in a must win situation tomorrow is my thought. Not that I think they could actually compete with the elite teams in the playoffs for the Lombardi but a taste of the competition could have went a long way toward maturing them for a run next season.

Viewing 30 posts - 241 through 270 (of 379 total)