Today’s Football Fare:

My wife wants to make a philly cheese steak casserole thing this afternoon. She cooks about once every two weeks so I try to encourage her whenever she does. I’m not a big fan of philly cheese steak regularly because of the over the top fat content. I’ll pretend like I like it. Who knows, it might be good.

I’m kind sick of cooking. I made a four gallon batch of spaghetti sauce Friday that we canned yesterday and made two different batches of apple butter earlier last week. We gift most of it out to family and friends\neighbors for Christmas or whatever. I thought the garden was about done and then she picked two five gallon buckets of jalapeno, green, red, and banana peppers yesterday and also eight gallons of tomatoes. I’d been trying to ignore it the past week.

I’m going to start to make another last giant batch of salsa starting tomorrow morning. We’re talking like 70 to 80 pints. We have already made about 175 pints of salsa this year and also tomato sauce and juice and spaghetti sauce and tomato soup. Ready for the big freeze anytime now.

Last Sunday I made a regular batch of chili – then it took us three or four days to eat it. That’s a lot of fiber filled days.

I hadn’t paid much attention to the email server, or politics for the past few years. But, I retired in May and started watching way too much tv news. Emails, Servers, lies, conspiracies etc…. seemed to be all I heard about last spring and summer. So, I read as much as I could to sort of catch up on all of this. I kept asking why would she do this.. why would anybody? What was she hoping to accomplish.

At this point, it’s difficult for me to get serious about indicting her regarding her stupid email server likely because I worked in the government and worked on old systems. I was never on the state departments email server but was on the MMIS(Medicaid/Medicare Information System) – and I’m here to tell you it was shit. It was almost impossible to use effectively – big old albatross systems that were outdated, unreliable, needed heavy maintenance. They were down as much as they were up which made it hard for anybody who gave a fuck to get anything done. So, I think when she decided to set this up she thought she was doing a good thing from a productivity stand point.

It’s my opinion that her super huge mistake with the server was she thought she could control the type of information that would appear – or maybe she didn’t but figured nobody would really care. For her part, she has apologized – which isn’t worth much I would say. Basically she gave the R’s the ammo to shoot at her mercilessly and all at tax payers expense. How nice for them.

I think what they tried to do was a step up from using a GMail or MSN email account to communicate because then you’re at the mercy of those entities and their security – see Yahoo recently. Her server gave her additional control and particularly over security. And, it’s hard for me to think she was trying to hide it – there were several hundred employees and public contracts with consultants and consulting firms. That’s a silly argument from my experience. I could be wrong but I think it was pretty common knowledge in the technical arena around Washington.

For what it’s worth, it appears that the Repubs did a similar and much larger thing. Nobody made a big deal about it that I’m aware of. So for me, it tarnished her forever. How she handled “being caught” has only made it worse.

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/george-w-bush-white-house-lost-22-million-emails-497373.html

For 18 months, Republican strategists, political pundits, reporters and Americans who follow them have been pursuing Hillary Clinton’s personal email habits, and no evidence of a crime has been found. But now they at least have the skills and interest to focus on a much larger and deeper email conspiracy, one involving war, lies, a private server run by the Republican Party and contempt of Congress citations—all of it still unsolved and unpunished.

Clinton’s email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House “lost” 22 million emails. This correspondence included millions of emails written during the darkest period in America’s recent history, when the Bush administration was ginning up support for what turned out to be a disastrous war in Iraq with false claims that the country possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and, later, when it was firing U.S. attorneys for political reasons.

Like Clinton, the Bush White House used a private email server—its was owned by the Republican National Committee. And the Bush administration failed to store its emails, as required by law, and then refused to comply with a congressional subpoena seeking some of those emails. “It’s about as amazing a double standard as you can get,” says Eric Boehlert, who works with the pro-Clinton group Media Matters. “If you look at the Bush emails, he was a sitting president, and 95 percent of his chief advisers’ emails were on a private email system set up by the RNC. Imagine if for the last year and a half we had been talking about Hillary Clinton’s emails set up on a private DNC server?”

Most troubling, researchers found a suspicious pattern in the White House email system blackouts, including periods when there were no emails available from the office of Vice President Dick Cheney. “That the vice president’s office, widely characterized as the most powerful vice president in history, should have no archived emails in its accounts for scores of days—especially days when there was discussion of whether to invade Iraq—beggared the imagination,” says Thomas Blanton, director of the Washington-based National Security Archive. The NSA (not to be confused with the National Security Agency, the federal surveillance organization) is a nonprofit devoted to obtaining and declassifying national security documents and is one of the key players in the effort to recover the supposedly lost Bush White House emails.

The media paid some attention to the Bush email chicanery but spent considerably less ink and airtime than has been devoted to Clinton’s digital communications in the past 18 months. According to the Boston social media analytics firm Crimson Hexagon, which ran a study for Newsweek, there have been 560,397 articles mentioning Clinton’s emails between March 2015 and September 1, 2016.

In 1978, Congress passed the Presidential Records Act (PRA), which mandated that all presidential and vice presidential records created after January 20, 1981, be preserved and that the public, not the president, owned the records. The following year, the Reagan administration installed the White House’s rudimentary first email system.

Despite the PRA, neither the Reagan nor the George H.W. Bush administration maintained email records, even as the number of White House emails began growing exponentially. (The Bush administration would produce around 200 million.) In 1989, a federal lawsuit to force the White House to comply with the PRA was filed by several groups, including the National Security Archive, which at the time was mostly interested in unearthing the secret history of the Cold War. The suit sparked a last-minute court order, issued in the waning hours of the first Bush presidency, that prevented 6,000 White House email backup tapes from being erased.

When Bill Clinton moved into the White House, his lawyers supported the elder Bush in his effort to uphold a side deal he’d cut with the National Archives and Records Administration to allow him to treat his White House emails as personal. At the time, George Stephanopoulos—then the White House communications director—defended the resistance, saying his boss, like Bush, didn’t want subsequent, and potentially unfriendly, administrations rooting around in old emails.

The Clinton White House eventually settled the suit, and White House aide John Podesta—now Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman—even invited members of the National Security Archive into the White House to demonstrate how the new system worked. If anyone tried to delete an email, a message would pop up on screen indicating that to do so would be in violation of the PRA.

“We were happy with that,” recalls Blanton, who edited a book on the Reagan-Bush email evasion, White House E-Mail: The Top Secret Messages the Reagan/Bush White House Tried to Destroy.

Eight years later, in 2003, a whistleblower told the National Security Archive that the George W. Bush White House was no longer saving its emails. The Archive and another watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (which had represented outed CIA agent Valerie Plame in her case against the Bush administration), refiled their original lawsuit.

The plaintiffs soon discovered that Bush aides had simply shut down the Clinton automatic email archive, and they identified the start date of the lost emails as January 1, 2003. The White House claimed it had switched to a new server and in the process was unable to maintain an archive—a claim that many found dubious.

Bush administration emails could have aided a special prosecutor’s investigation into a White House effort to discredit a diplomat who disagreed with the administration’s fabricated Iraq WMD evidence by outing his CIA agent wife, Plame. Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who was brought in to investigate that case, said in 2006 that he believed some potentially relevant emails sent by aides in Cheney’s office were in the administration’s system but he couldn’t get them.

Former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney listens as former President George W. Bush makes remarks about the U.S. defense budget after meeting with military leaders at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., November 29, 2007.

The supposedly lost emails also prevented Congress from fully investigating, in 2007, the politically motivated firing of nine U.S. attorneys. When the Democrat-led Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed related emails, Bush’s attorney general, Alberto Gonzalez, said many were inaccessible or lost on a nongovernmental private server run by the RNC and called gwb43.com. The White House, meanwhile, officially refused to comply with the congressional subpoena.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) called the president’s actions “Nixonian stonewalling” and at one point took to the floor in exasperation and shouted, “They say they have not been preserved. I don’t believe that!” His House counterpart, Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.), said Bush’s assertion of executive privilege was unprecedented and displayed “an appalling disregard for the right of the people to know what is going on in their government.”

In court in May 2008, administration lawyers contended that the White House had lost three months’ worth of email backups from the initial days of the Iraq War. Bush aides thus evaded a court-ordered deadline to describe the contents of digital backup believed to contain emails deleted in 2003 between March—when the U.S. invaded Iraq—and September. They also refused to give the NSA nonprofit any emails relating to the Iraq War, despite the PRA, blaming a system upgrade that had deleted up to 5 million emails. The plaintiffs eventually contended that the Bush administration knew about the problem in 2005 but did nothing to fix it.

Eventually, the Bush White House admitted it had lost 22 million emails, not 5 million. Then, in December 2009—well into Barack Obama’s administration—the White House said it found 22 million emails, dated between 2003 and 2005, that it claimed had been mislabeled. That cache was given to the National Archives, and it and other plaintiffs agreed, on December 14, 2009, to settle their lawsuit. But the emails have not yet been made available to the public.

The Senate Judiciary Committee was operating on a different track but having no more luck. In a bipartisan vote in 2008, the committee found White House aides Karl Rove and Joshua Bolten in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with subpoenas in the investigation of the fired U.S. attorneys. The penalties for contempt are fines and possible jail time, but no punishment was ever handed down because a D.C. federal appeals court stayed the Senate’s ruling in October 2008, while the White House appealed. Rove’s lawyer claimed Rove did not “intentionally delete” any emails but was only conducting “the type of routine deletions people make to keep their inboxes orderly,” according to the Associated Press.

By then, Obama was weeks away from winning the election, so the Bush administration basically ran out the clock. And neither the Obama administration nor the Senate committee pursued the matter.

The committee’s final report on the matter was blunt: “[T]his subversion of the justice system has included lying, misleading, stonewalling and ignoring the Congress in our attempts to find out precisely what happened. The reasons given for these firings were contrived as part of a cover-up, and the stonewalling by the White House is part and parcel of that same effort.”

At the time, some journalists and editorialists complained about a lack of transparency on the White House’s part, but The Washington Post, in an editorial, accepted the White House explanation that the emails could have been lost due to flawed IT systems.

The mystery of what was in the missing Bush emails and why they went missing is still years away from being solved—if ever. The National Archives now has 220 million emails from the Bush White House, and there is a long backlog of Freedom of Information Act requests already. But not all of the emails will be available to the public until 2021, when the presidential security restrictions elapse. Even then, with currently available archiving and sorting methods, researchers still have years of work to figure out whether Cheney deleted days’ worth of emails around the time of the WMD propaganda campaign that led to war, Blanton says.

“To your question of what’s in there—we don’t know,” he says. “There was not a commitment at the top for saving it all. Now was that resistance motivated by political reasons? Or was it ‘We gotta save money’?”

Former U.S. President George W. Bush winks to a member of the audience before he delivers the final State of the Union address of his presidency at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., January 28, 2008.

Like Leahy, Blanton has doubts that the emails were ever truly “lost,” given that every email exists in two places, with the sender and with the recipient. But unlike watchdog group Judicial Watch, which has been relentless about forcing the State Department to publicly release Hillary Clinton’s emails, Blanton and his fellow researchers have decided not to press their fight for the release of the Bush emails.

Blanton says he has no idea whether the Bush email record will be found intact after 2021, when his group will be allowed to do a systematic search and recovery process in the National Archives. “Did they find all of them? We don’t know,” he says. “Our hope is that by that time, the government and the National Archives will have much better technology and tools with which to sift and sort that kind of volume.”

Blanton says he’s not expecting that kind of upgrade, though. “Their entire budget is less than the cost of a single Marine One helicopter,” he says. “It’s an underfunded orphan.”
Meanwhile, the episode has been nearly forgotten by almost everyone but the litigants. A source involved with the stymied congressional investigation recalled the period as “an intense time,” but the Obama administration didn’t encourage any follow-up, devoting its political capital to dealing with the crashing economy rather than investigating the murky doings that took place under his predecessor. Since then, no major media outlet has devoted significant—or, really, any—resources to obtaining the emails, or to finding out what was in them, or what, exactly, the Bush administration was hiding (or losing).

I’d perhaps watch if I had a button that would send a simulated dog collar type of shock-response to either of the debaters or the moderator whenever I felt like shocking the living fuck out of them.

I want them to earn my vote.

I’m going to pre-dict a nail biting 11 to 10 win for the Rams.

They will score a td but miss the extra point.

I liked Carr’s analysis too. Pre draft I preferred Wentz – obviously – not at the same level of understanding as David Carr who I really like to listen to. My thing pre draft was that a large, mobile QB with a rocket arm would be better particularly from a long term perspective.

But I didn’t ever dislike or not want Goff either. I like them all. Goff also has a great arm just not quite as big or mobile. I liked what I saw from Goff in the preseason – sure, he had some hiccups and looked a bit lost when a play broke down but don’t all of them? Once he adjusts to the speed of the game, I think that will improve tremendously. See Peyton Mannings rookie year to verify that. Goff can certainly throw the ball accurately – and I think that all the rest of it will come because he’s ready and able to work hard to improve.

So, this retirement thing is ok – as long as the wife goes to work all day and the dog doesn’t question my judgement.

Well, pumpkin pie is not my thing – I’m obviously more of a carrot guy.

• This reply was modified 7 years, 8 months ago by sdram.

Yes he does.

I don’t know what was worse – watching the rams pitiful performance or having to sit through three hours of Chris Ethyl Merman Berman slamming the Ram while praising the niners. He’s pathetic. What a slap in the face to open up the LA Rams first game back with that Niner homer on mike.

I’m ready for a sugar free class of chocolate skim milk and then some shut eye

• This reply was modified 7 years, 8 months ago by sdram.

Leaves something to be desired – maybe he was nervous in a deadpan transactional listing type of way.

• This reply was modified 7 years, 8 months ago by sdram.

bnw wrote:

I feel that way about posting here.

BNW – I appreciate you. I hope you keep posting whatever and whenever you think you need to or want to.

Similar thing here, in the fireplace upstairs to heat up the flue for a good draft I’ll sometimes lay a couple of whole sheets of newspaper right on top of the wood bundle after I have it stacked just so and ready to light.

I also have glass doors that help quite a bit if the wind is blowing down the flue which sometimes happens here in the wind tunnel.

In the basement wood burner it seems like I can almost spit on the wood and it starts burning. Maybe it’s the xrey fision — xray vision.

Maybe he had a part in the latest version of “Springtime for Hitler”

9-5-2

Lots of ties this season.