Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 3,121 through 3,150 (of 3,566 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What does yesterday's victory mean (re: the big picture)? #30467
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Yeah, good point, Nitt.

    The Foreskins will be a good test just because it’s on the road. I expect a close game. I hope the young O-line can handle crowd noise … they will have to come up big if Foles is going to have enough time to ding Washington like he did Seattle.

    I think long-term here’s what the Seahawks game means to me: Foles can come up big in a close game. The Rams can run the ball on a good defense at home. Tavon Austin, when healthy, is a dangerous weapon. So, this offense SHOULD be better.

    The other thing this game shows, well, reinforces, is that Aaron Donald is a monster. And, the Rams have finally built some depth in the secondary. Roberson came up really big.

    I still worry about Greg Robinson at LT, though. He’s just so inconsistent. Please don’t get our QB killed. I do not want to return to the days of backups. I liked watching a starter-caliber guy make some big plays. Loved that Foles has a nice touch on his pass. He was inaccurate at times. But, he also dropped some beautiful balls in some tight spots.

    Yeah, I think this team has turned the corner. I fully expect them to dispatch the burgundy and gold team with little effort. Like you say though, gotta keep Foles healthy. My heart sank for a second yesterday when he was sacked on the corner blitz and didn’t get up right away.

    in reply to: What Seattle posters are saying #30463
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I would be concerned if I was a hawks fan. They didn’t even seem to be aware of the youth/inexperience of the Rams OL, or they might feel even worse.

    I dunno. Sometimes the wheels come off on a good team that loses a SB. They have GB next week, and might be 0-2 to start the season.

    Anyway, that was fun to read.

    Yeah, they gave up THREE touchdown drives of 80 yards or more to a team with two rookies, a second year guy and a first time starter on the o-line. Plus they were playing without their two best backs and a starting receiver.

    That was not an inspired effort by the defense. I don’t know what game that last commenter was watching.

    in reply to: S.I. sez: Rams have best D-line in NFL #30461
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    is donald the face of this franchise? i think so. i like quinn. but he doesn’t seem to have the intangibles that donald does. i think donald is able to inspire those around him.

    can certain players elevate the play of those around him? i know some people don’t believe in that, but i think donald does that.

    i hope gurley can do that for the offense.

    Well, right now the Rams have the best DE and DT in football. When was the last time that was the case? It was certainly true with Deacon and Merlin and an argument can be made for Youngblood and Brooks but the point is, it’s been over 35 years since the Rams have had this sorta talent on the DL.

    in reply to: how does Foles look to you so far #30459
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    That play where he flipped it to Cunningham with the pocket collapsing on him and a defender on his back was something I don’t remember any previous Rams QB being able to pull off with the possible exception of Warner.

    That ability to improvise when everything is breaking down is one area where Foles is superior to Bradford. Foles also seems to be better than Bradford when he has defenders in his face. Bradford needed a really clean pocket.

    in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30369
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    yeah. but you gotta remember this was the number one rushing offense last year at 172.6 yards a game at a 5.3 average. rams held them to a 3.9 average.

    Yeah. 32 carries for 124 yards, 3.9.

    And you know what else? In the 4 Fisher Rams home games against Seattle, Wilson has now been sacked 18 times.

    Which might be part of the reason they run so much.

    And he’s been sacked 31 times overall against the Rams according to the play by play announcer. You’d think he’d hate playing the Rams.

    in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30362
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    PS, watching the NFL Channel replay of that last play, one saw BOTH Ram DTs destroying the rushing attempt.

    I mean, that’s defensive football heaven, when BOTH of your DTs step up like that.

    However, I see on the stats sources that we gave up 125 yards or so rushing. I imagine some of that was RW scrambling? Hmmmmm.

    Brochers was an immovable object all day. Donald was like a penetrating dementor. They gave up a 20 yard run to Lynch once and a 10 yarder where he carried half the defense on his back but for the most part he was bottled up.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30344
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    When was the last time you saw the Rams lose the turnover battle but win the game?

    It used to happen regularly during GSOT. Can’t say when it’s happened since then.

    in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30343
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Well, I wouldn’t-a-thunk-it!

    Got back from the driving range and am amazed by the result. Fantastic.

    Sounds like it was a weird game. Hard to tell from the box score what really happened.

    But, I see we got 3 sacks? That’s encouraging. Seems as if the D played fairly well, with 14 points yielded by the O and STs. (Just watched the NFL Channel highlights)

    I’ll be interested to see reports on the OL.

    But for me the biggest issue is how our DL is empowered to play. With 3 sacks and Lynch held to 78 (?) that’s a pretty good sign.

    A good start. Over .500 for the first time in forever. Next week 2-0?

    We need it. And you know what? Ram fans DESERVE IT!

    Rams d got 6 sacks.

    in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30330
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    That was awesome. I take back everything I said about this team’s supposed lack of preparation. The defense hit the field in midseason form and the young o-line accounted well. How bout’ that Benny Cunningham, eh?

    Foles showed toughness and poise and nice accuracy on his long balls (except for that bomb to Tavon – Tavon was open early but Foles mistimed his throw).

    I couldn’t be happier with the way things played out. Hope Sims and TruJo are ok.

    Cignetti? A+ for both scheme and play-calling.

    in reply to: going over the 16 game schedule #30279
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I’m not sure at Arizona is very winnable. Not if Palmer is healthy.

    That 4 game stretch of at Baltimore, at Cincy, AZ, and Detroit is a killer. I would be elated if they could go 2-2 against that group.

    in reply to: I get to read this kind of stuff for a living. #30277
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Should the right to be racist and sexist be taken away from the homeless man?

    That is my new tag line.

    in reply to: Labor Day songs #30268
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Tom Morello is a Rams fan

    No wonder he can write such poignant music.

    He understands suffering.

    in reply to: Will the Rams beat Seattle? #30246
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    The Rams always play Seattle tough at home but I don’t like the prospects of their inexperienced o-line against that Seahawk defense – especially when the Rams are minus their two best backs.

    The Rams defense usually takes 5 or 6 games to get up to speed and nothing about what I saw in preseason would lead me to believe that will be different this season.

    Seattle 24, Rams 9.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: Would you kill 6.5 Billion people ? #30244
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I dunno. Reason without compassion could lead to disaster too.
    Just like Spirituality could lead to ‘religion’ which then leads to disaster.

    w
    v

    Well, I don’t think reason and compassion are mutually exclusive. And compassion isn’t born of religion or spirituality. Love, altruism, compassion…these things predate religion. Religious beliefs teach us that those of us who believe the ‘correct’ way are better than those who don’t. We own the truth. That leads to prejudice which leads to holocaust.

    Reason tells us that we’re all the same and therefore entitled to be treated the same.

    But, I’m not saying those with a spiritual belief should necessarily be disappeared. I’m just throwing the potential pitfalls out there. You run the risk of allowing the same sort of institutionalized patriarchy, bigotry and classism that you’re trying to avoid to arise again.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: No TV blackouts for Rams this season #30229
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    If the Rams are forced to stay in St. Louis, I wonder how long it will take to repair their relationship with the fans. St. Louis fans will know the Rams are only there because they were forced to stay. I suppose the attraction of a shiny new stadium on the river will get some fans back in the seats but it could take a long time for attendance to get back to normal. Whether you want the Rams to play in LA or StL you have to admit that Kroenke has treated StL fans with little regard through all this. I wouldn’t be surprised if fans stayed away. I suspect attendance would be off for a while even if the Rams start winning.

    in reply to: New discovery in South African cave… #30228
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I wonder if they were disappeared by a Homo erectus that didn’t like their extremist/paleoconservative views about fire

    in reply to: Steelers vs Patriots #30204
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Root for the Steelers to win despite an embarrassingly dismal performance by Roethlisberger. They win only because Brady and Belichick are nabbed just before the game in an FBI sting. They are arrested while trying to purchase illicit electronic surveillance equipment from an undercover agent.

    in reply to: Would you kill 6.5 Billion people ? #30178
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I think eventually we would end up in more-or-less the same place. But it would perhaps be worth a try, since we are certainly doomed given the trajectory we are on.

    I mean, if you could get rid of everyone who thinks violence is a justifiable conflict resolution, it might change things. And the irony would be worth it.

    Welcome aboard. Now who do we vaporize first?

    I’m thinkin we start with all Religious-Fundamentalists.
    For starters.
    That should get us down to, what? 4.5 billion maybe?

    Then we eliminate Patriot fans.

    w
    v

    Who gets to live?

    Yes, well at least now you are on the genocide-train
    with Zooey and Me.

    Who gets to live?

    Good question. I think about it a lot, LoL.

    I prefer to start at the other end —
    who gets eliminated first.

    I’d start with the religious-fundamentalists.

    Any objection to that?

    And then all fascists, Republicans, Nazis,
    KKK members, and Corporate-Capitalists.

    Objections?

    Just think of a world without religious fundamentalists.
    That alone would make political policies completely different
    in the US and Middle-East.
    v

    Here’s where it get’s tricky.
    I would have no problem eliminating all religious fundementalists. But what about “believers” in general? As long as the seed exists then isn’t the possibility of fundementalism taking root always present? Wouldn’t we want our new society to be based on reason rather than faith?

    in reply to: Would you kill 6.5 Billion people ? #30170
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I think eventually we would end up in more-or-less the same place. But it would perhaps be worth a try, since we are certainly doomed given the trajectory we are on.

    I mean, if you could get rid of everyone who thinks violence is a justifiable conflict resolution, it might change things. And the irony would be worth it.

    Welcome aboard. Now who do we vaporize first?

    I’m thinkin we start with all Religious-Fundamentalists.
    For starters.
    That should get us down to, what? 4.5 billion maybe?

    Then we eliminate Patriot fans.

    w
    v

    Who gets to live?

    in reply to: Barnes the starter, and other JT tweets #30137
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    The only thing that can kill Barnes is Barnes…

    barnes barnes2

    in reply to: Would you kill 6.5 Billion people ? #30064
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    No, I couldn’t just dissappear 6.5 billion people even though I think the world would be a much better place with them gone. Even if I knew they would be going to a better place. I couldn’t make that decision for them. Even if it meant getting rid of all those people who I think deserve to be gone – getting rid of those who are responsible for or willingly contribute to pain and suffering. I couldn’t do it. I couldn’t do what needes to be done.

    I could kill all Pitt fans though.

    But that’s only about 5 people, tops.

    in reply to: Labor Day songs #29975
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Check out the Nightwatchmen – Tom Morello’s group.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nightwatchman

    in reply to: Judge nullifies NFL's 4-game suspension against Tom Brady #29788
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    From Nittany’s link:

    “…The court is fully aware of the deference afforded to arbitral decisions, but, nevertheless, concludes that the Award should be vacated,” Berman penned in his 40-page ruling. “The Award is premised upon several significant legal deficiencies, including
    (A) inadequate notice to Brady of both his potential discipline (four-game suspension) and his alleged misconduct;
    (B) denial of the opportunity for Brady to examine one of two lead investigators, namely NFL Executive Vice President and General Counsel Jeff Pash; and
    (C) denial of equal access to investigative files, including witness interview notes.”
    =============

    Looks to me, like all of that stuff has to do with the “procedure”
    the NFL followed. Seems like the NFL could have easily complied
    with Brady’s requests for discovery. Dunno why they didnt.

    Btw, I dont care one way or another about Brady’s suspension.

    And fwiw, my own view is the Patriots/Belichex/Brady will always
    have a shadow now, no matter what the Courts or NFL does. The
    fans of 31 teams will always kinda ‘wonder’ about the Patriots.

    w
    v

    If I’m not mistaken, each one of the Pats’ Superbowl victories has some controversy surrounding it. Tuck rule, spy-gate, deflate-gate…

    in reply to: Judge nullifies NFL's 4-game suspension against Tom Brady #29773
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    http://stl.247sports.com/Bolt/Judge-rules-in-Tom-Bradys-favor-39120678

    “He who commits injustice is ever made more wretched than he who suffers it.”
    – Plato

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: what do you want from this final pre-season game? #29763
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Oline improvement and I’d like to see Tavon Austin do something offensively.

    in reply to: Humans Need Not Apply #29758
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I want it to happen because we finally wake up and realize we need to do it for the future of humanity and every other living thing on the planet.

    Oh, yeah. That could happen.

    Every revolution begins with a single person espousing a single idea for the first time.

    I’ve sewn the seed. Let’s see what grows.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if everyone on earth was on board with negative population growth by the end of the week.

    in reply to: Humans Need Not Apply #29739
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    There is a simple solution. As humans become obsolete they can be used to feed those humans who are still essential.

    wv, perhaps you should relax more. Don’t want your muscles to get all tough and stringy.

    Of course, humans being replaced by automation wouldn’t be as big a problem if our population wasn’t multiplying exponentially.

    Would love to see a negative population growth until we got down to sustainable, environmentally friendly numbers. Obviously I don’t want this to happen through disease, famine, genocide or war. I want it to happen because we finally wake up and realize we need to do it for the future of humanity and every other living thing on the planet.

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Who’s “we”? I said they would be 10-6 this year…and that’s not playoffs, largely because, as you indicated, the OL injuries (along with the qb injury) that derailed last year had to be repaired with rookies.

    By “we” I mean the royal “we”, as in “me”.

    And believe we…er, I mean me, when I/we say, we are not amused by the state of this team.

    royal

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    But they can develop together, which is IMO precisely what will happen.

    Well, they may develop together. Next year this oline may be a team strength. But this is the year we were looking to for the team to make its jump to playoff contention (actually last year originally was, but Bradford’s injury and the prejudice of others conspired to keep up playoff-less). Right now its shaping up to look like another wasted year.

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    The defense should solve its problems and be good enough if not elite.

    Yet it seems the defense still hasn’t figured out GW’s scheme. As Mike said, these schemes fool our defense more than the other team’s offense. DB’s still don’t get their coverage assignments and the LB’s either can’t get off blocks or they’re missing their gaps. For that reason, despite the talent, I suspect this defense will probably be solid but not elite.

Viewing 30 posts - 3,121 through 3,150 (of 3,566 total)