Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 301 through 330 (of 2,100 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Von Miller to the Los Angeles Rams #133566
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I didn’t see us getting Brandin Cooks back. I looked Online

    in reply to: our reactions to the Houston game #133484
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Gave up 22 points in a short span, to a terrible football team. We should be embarrassed. We are no way a Super Bowl contender, if our Defense plays like this.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/20 thru 10/23 #133301
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    What’s the cap like next year? We have a lot of UFA’s on our OLine, excluding Havenstein. Let’s not forget about Whit may retire.

    It’s all been brought up, Jack. Whit may retire and 3 others are FAs: Noteboom, Allen, and Corbett.

    IF Noteboom is the guy they sign him. IMO same with Allen. They need to extend Stafford too Corbett could walk. They always manufacture cap space for things like that.

    Right now they have 6+ M in cap space but the ability to manufacture more. If nothing else, Whitworth retiring would clear up 13 M more. Add Robinson to that and it’s 18+ M more. That right there would be 24 M more, before counting any roll overs. I don’t know if these numbers account for Hav’s restructure.

    We have a cap of $203M, in 2022 with restructuring

    Salary Cap Calculator

    I assume we will restructure, Floyd and Stafford.

    in reply to: Tutu #133423
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Who else was available when McSnead picked that
    tiny tiny Tutu?

    w
    v

    Creed Humphrey. He can play Center or Guard.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/20 thru 10/23 #133296
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    What’s the cap like next year? We have a lot of UFA’s on our OLine, excluding Havenstein. Let’s not forget about Whit may retire.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Giants game #133139
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Stafford seems to have his struggles. There were throws, that I felt that could have been picked off, and this was against the Giants. If we were playing a better team, those would have been INTs

    The defense played a lot better today, but then again, it is against the Giants. We should be able to dominate the next two weeks as well.

    Wolford sucks. Wish we could have found a team to trade him to, I mean it would have been nice to get a future 7th rounder for him. Then we could have Bryce Perkins as Stafford’s backup.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Seattle game #132863
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Stafford still is not there. Played better in the 2nd Half, but let’s see how it goes from beyond this game. I’m believing, we really miss Brockers, Hill, & Johnson a lot. Rapp sux, Outside of Ramsey, our CBs have been struggling. I’m going to give Robert Rochelle a pass, since he is a rookie, & a 4th rounder. So R-squared needs time.

    in reply to: media on the ARIZONA home game #132777
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Capitol riots: aftermaths #132712
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Justin Tucker #132552
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 1 month ago by JackPMiller.
    in reply to: Our reactions to the Bux game #132511
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    No one answered this question?

    What did McVay run to get to DJax, after that score?

    I still say he ran a 4.2. Just saying

    in reply to: Our reactions to the Bux game #132499
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Defense played inconsistent. Especially, I didn’t like that we gave up that late TD to them Bucs.

    in reply to: NFL player & coaching predictions. #132059
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Who are these people?

    I don’t think any of them are Rams (except maybe that “AD” guy you allude to…).

    None of them are Rams. I expect the Rams will be overlooked for these awards.

    in reply to: JackPMiller’s NFL Predictions #131819
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    The Jets 7 – 10?

    Come on, Jack, they’re THE JETS!

    My guess: 3 – 14.

    I really like Robert Saleh. He is going to help them win. I believe he is going to be an excellent Head Coach.

    in reply to: JackPMiller’s NFL Predictions #131815
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Jack you have the Raiders @ 9 and 9 which I don’t believe will happen in the regular season but other than that it’s a reasonable take all one could expect at this point

    The Raiders are supposed to be 8 and 9.

    The Vikings are 7 and 10.

    I wish we had an edit button, so when we take notice, later on, we made a mistake, we can fix it. But as zn says, this site doesn’t have that.

    in reply to: JackPMiller’s NFL Predictions #131813
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I assume everyone is OK with my predictions.

    in reply to: Snead (vid) on the Michel trade #131741
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Does that mean we have to start by Sony products now? Just saying. Since he is named after a product.

    By the way, do we have any more Rams players, or coaches that are named after products on this roster? Just wondering

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 8/12 thru 8/20 #131566
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Mexico sues US gun manufacturers over arms trafficking #131520
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: political tweets #131390
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    le

    in reply to: Capitol riots: aftermaths #131286
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Tell me again how the insurrection wasn’t planned in advance. Because I wonder what the lead time was for the design and production of these MAGA Civil War t-shirts with the exact date on them. There were hundreds of them out there.

    jan

    in reply to: Capitol riots: aftermaths #131233
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Capitol riots: aftermaths #131191
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/07/27/fact-check-nancy-pelosi-isnt-in-charge-capitol-police/8082088002/?fbclid=IwAR30pEhOXYpNUWyiORuU7FfRbIigFf3rFHl7-jG4_Jo-u8rGVT0JvycTBbU

    Fact check: Nancy Pelosi wasn’t ‘in charge’ of Capitol Police on Jan. 6
    Ella Lee, USA TODAY
    July 27, 2021

    The claim: Nancy Pelosi was in charge of Capitol Police on Jan. 6

    As Capitol Hill geared up for the first hearing of a special committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, some conservatives claimed Nancy Pelosi has a conflict of interest.

    A July 22 Facebook post asserts Pelosi, who created the committee, is using her role as speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives to skirt responsibility for security failures on Jan. 6.

    “So let me get this straight…Nancy Pelosi was in charge of Capitol Police on Jan. 6. They were understaffed and underprepared. But now she gets to be in charge of the investigation of…herself?!” reads text in the post from Dan Carr, a Mississippi pastor with more than 30,000 followers on Facebook.

    The post is a screenshot of a post originally published July 21 by Rogan O’Handley, a conservative influencer, on Gettr. The social media site was recently launched by Jason Miller, previously an adviser to former President Donald Trump.

    Fact check:Post falsely claims Pelosi is blocking Capitol Police officers from testifying

    The claim that Pelosi was in charge of the U.S. Capitol Police during the insurrection has circulated both online and offline for months. On July 21 , U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, floated the claim after Pelosi rejected his appointment to the Jan. 6 special committee.

    “Why wasn’t there a proper security presence at the Capitol that day?” Jordan asked at a news conference. “Only one person can answer that question. Only one. The Speaker of the United States House of Representatives.

    But a look at the Capitol Police’s chain of command shows that Pelosi wasn’t in charge of the law enforcement agency on Jan. 6. USA TODAY previously rated a similar claim false, and other independent fact-checking organizations have reached similar conclusions.

    Pelosi not ‘in charge’ of Capitol Police

    In response to USA TODAY’s request for comment, Carr reiterated the claim in his Facebook post.

    “The Speaker Nancy Pelosi is responsible for the police officers on Capitol Hill!!” Carr said in an email. “On January 6th they was understaffed due to her lack of over site (sic). With the lack of personnel, the United States capitol was breached which should have never happened. Now she is in charge of the investigation of what happened on January 6th.”

    But that’s wrong. The Capitol Police are overseen by a number of entities and individuals, none of whom are Pelosi.

    In March, Capitol Police spokesperson John Stolnis told USA TODAY that the agency is overseen by the Capitol Police Board. Several congressional committees also oversee the agency, including the House and Senate appropriations committees, the House administration commitee and the Senate rules committee.

    The Capitol Police Board is made up of the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms, as well as the Capitol architect. The Capitol Police chief serves in a non-voting capacity on the board, according to the Capitol Police website.

    Pelosi was not a chair or administrator of any committee supervising the Capitol Police at the time of the insurrection. She’s not listed on any of those committees’ websites today, either.

    More:Jan. 6 committee: DC Metro officer saw law enforcement support flag amid riots

    Jane L. Campbell, president of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society, told CNN “the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the U.S. Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.”

    Commission not only about Capitol Police

    In the wake of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by pro-Trump rioters, Pelosi called for a 9/11-style special committee to investigate the day’s events.

    In May, Senate Republicans blocked a House bill aimed at creating a bipartisan committee to investigate the insurrection. In response, Pelosi announced June 24 the creation of a select committee. Republicans have called the effort unnecessary and political.

    While the select committee will likely investigate the Capitol Police’s role in the days leading up to Jan. 6, that isn’t the sole focus.

    The select committee “will investigate and report on the facts and the causes of the attack and report recommendations for the prevention” of another attack, Pelosi said in June. The committee could examine the actions of some current and former representatives and senators, as well as the general lack of preparedness on Capitol Hill. There is no evidence Pelosi herself will be investigated.

    The committee’s first hearing began on July 27.

    What about Pelosi’s appointment powers?

    O’Handley told USA TODAY there are questions about Pelosi’s objectivity since she has the ability to appoint or control members of both the Capitol Police and the Jan. 6 investigation .

    But Pelosi does not appoint members to the Capitol Police Board

    Both the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms are elected and confirmed by their respective chambers. They report to the heads of those chambers – on Jan. 6, that was Pelosi and former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

    The president appoints the Capitol architect for a 10-year term “with the advice and consent of the Senate,” according to a Congressional Research Service report. Trump nominated Brett Blanton to that position in December.

    As speaker, Pelosi can appoint members of the House to committees, some of which have a hand in overseeing the Capitol Police. McConnell has the same power in the Senate.

    Fact check:False claim persists online that Trump will be reinstated as president in August

    O’Handley is correct to say that Pelosi has the power to appoint members of the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 riot.

    Pelosi has selected eight members for the committee so far – seven Democrats and one Republican. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy can select five members to join the committee, but they must be approved by Pelosi.

    Our rating: False

    The claim that Pelosi was in charge of Capitol Police on Jan. 6 is FALSE, based on our research. While the House speaker has some ties to Capitol Police oversight, saying Pelosi is “in charge” of the agency isn’t accurate. The agency is overseen by a three-member board, none of whom are appointed by Pelosi. Additionally, the Jan. 6 select committee will investigate more than the Capitol Police, and there’s no evidence Pelosi herself will be investigated.

    in reply to: Video of me singing #131125
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Not sure why it is starting at 24 seconds, instead of 0? Go to the youtube page, it starts at 0.

    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Wonder if Jake Funk sings like me? Hmm?

    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 7/16 thru 7/20 #130988
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #130836
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    maid

    in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #130835
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    vac

    in reply to: What’s Up Guys #130819
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Welcome back. We would like to know your thoughts on the Big Bang Theory. You can talk about the TV show if you want, if you don’t like to talk about the other one.

Viewing 30 posts - 301 through 330 (of 2,100 total)