Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 6,091 through 6,120 (of 6,770 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WRs in the draft: Cooper, White, Perriman, Parker . #21951
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i would give it serious consideration. if i could pull it off with just a fourth rounder, then i’d look to draft offensive line in the second round.

    but i’m also a guy willing to trade down and pick gurley. and i know we’d disagree on that as well.

    Well, that is all a matter of how much we value players not on what is the correct strategy. imo So, your opinion is valid.

    well i think your opinion is completely valid too!

    haha!

    in reply to: WRs in the draft: Cooper, White, Perriman, Parker . #21950
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think amari cooper has the potential to be a bigger faster version of isaac bruce. that’s why i try and trade up to get him. i really like this guy.

    in reply to: WRs in the draft: Cooper, White, Perriman, Parker . #21947
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I don’t really believe in trading up. The cost is almost always too high and who knows the player might drop. I would have traded up for two players, Jackson and Green. Green never got close enough for me to really consider, though. Or you could consider trading up like for a red chip or blue chip player if you aren’t in the range, maybe. Short answer, NO, I am not trading up for Cooper. Mostly cause I am happy to draft Collins. Although I take Cooper if he drops.

    i would give it serious consideration. if i could pull it off with just a fourth rounder, then i’d look to draft offensive line in the second round.

    but i’m also a guy willing to trade down and pick gurley. and i know we’d disagree on that as well.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i liked the read on collins.

    still think #10 would be too high but i wouldn’t be disappointed if they picked him there.

    i also like tre jackson from florida state. although much lower in the draft.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: JT chat, 3/31 #21896
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    If the Raiders come, what are the odds of one city having 3 incompetent NFL owners in a single generation. Geez!
    by Bob in Denver 4:11 PM

    You made me laugh out loud with this one. And imagine what the stadium would look like, with a ring of honor for Cardinals, Rams, and Raiders!

    This is kind of sad for a team’s legacy, particularly the players involved. They become memories of a ghost town. Yes–they may be appreciated for what they did but their attachment to the city is dead, really, because the team itself is dead and if anything people probably would prefer not to think about the team that left them.

    And the new city? Well, the GSOT never happened there.

    I feel like a nomad fan for a nomad team.

    Speaking for myself, it doesn’t matter. I’ve always been a nomad fan–never picked the local team to follow. But there are people who do, and I appreciate that. Kids who grew up going to games with their mom and dad and part of that experience is WHY they are fans.

    I know some people could care less about the fans of St. Louis and will be quick to say that the fans of St. Louis didn’t care about THEM when the Rams moved from L.A.

    I get that.

    But the process and practice of moving NFL teams should make everyone a little sick.

    not so much the relocation. but yeah the process of holding a city hostage. trying to squeeze as much as you can out of them. that sucks hard.

    in reply to: JT chat, 3/31 #21895
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I’ve been told that if the team relocates, many employees will have to re-apply for their jobs. Which I think would mean Kroenke would not pay relocation costs.

    If true…this is really sucky of them.

    that’d be a real kick in the balls.

    in reply to: JT chat, 3/31 #21887
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’m expecting a big year from robinson. rams need to start hitting on these first rounders. big time. especially robinson given that he’s on the oline.

    in reply to: Jim Thomas: Rams are simplifying their defense #21865
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well what was the case before williams? what were the defenses like before? simple? complex?

    in reply to: Jim Thomas: Rams are simplifying their defense #21845
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’m not sure it needed simplification as much as some guys like ogletree and jenkins need to get their heads right.

    ogletree needs to show up in shape. jenkins needs to not gamble so much.

    oh and brockers needs to keep his weight up.

    in reply to: Alvin Dupree – Arik Armstead – DEs #21844
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    short arms dupree has…

    ha

    in reply to: The draft–prospects, scouting, mocks #21835
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i worry about those alabama backs although ingram had a good 2014.

    they do need to pick a running back somewhere though.

    get him and collins. robinson saffold collins barksdale. that’d be a nice line to run behind. barnes or jones at center?

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i would not want parker. i’d rather they go ol or gurley at that point if they can’t trade down.

    i don’t think cooper makes it past top 5.

    in reply to: Rams Addiction Podcast, Episode 94: Stadium #21817
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah. the one thing i would definitely disagree with is i think they’re a little too optimistic about the league doing the honorable thing.

    i don’t think i’d put the chances of the rams staying at an even 50-50.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    one or two of these guys should fall to the second round no?

    on the other hand rams have passed up on some good guard prospects in the past and are now paying for it. warford in particular comes to mind.

    in reply to: Rams Addiction Podcast, Episode 94: Stadium #21755
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    mr. kroenke. he’s the devil.

    yeah. he has positioned himself well. and he gives the league many options. the league is very happy with stan.

    that was a good listen.

    i agree with a lot of what they say.

    in reply to: The draft–prospects, scouting, mocks #21753
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    basically rams better try hard as hell to trade down.

    in reply to: Active GMs with best record of drafting Pro Bowlers #21731
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    what is snead’s record? the only pro bowler i can think of is donald.

    in reply to: OL in free agency … Barksdale, Blalock, Wisniewski, etc. #21730
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    just from the standpoint of getting any offensive lineman in free agency would be great. but to also get the continuity and to not have to overpay for it would be huge. if they can re-sign him the rams played that one well.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’m curious as to what the rams think about hundley. as far as measurables go he’s about as ideal as you can get. you just wonder about the mental aspect.

    in reply to: WRs in the draft: Cooper, White, Perriman, Parker . #21937
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    cooper is one of those he’s most likely out of our reach, but if he gets to #8, do you consider trading up for him?

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i agree. i’m feeling pretty positive about foles right now. i think they do need to improve the running game as well but yeah. if they can fix the oline. foles should exceed expectations.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    meanwhile you have a state of the art stadium in inglewood. you can have superbowls probowls. you can have the combine. the draft. you also have room for another team. they’ll use it as leverage or the chargers move there at a later date. although my guess is that they’d prefer the chargers stay in san diego.

    is this fair? probably not but the nfl would be able to sell this with the only loser being raider fans. but again i think that would be the acceptable loss here. the weakest link in the owners eyes.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    it will be what’s best for the league. they couldn’t ask for a better situation what with three teams with southern california connections. the one sure thing is the chargers. they’re already based in this area. i think it’s a no brainer.

    so then it comes down to the rams and raiders.

    i think the rams win in almost every category.

    they have a long history in los angeles. it should be much easier establishing a fan base.

    and as much as fans aren’t fond of stan he’s the stronger owner at least in the eyes of the league.

    i have a hard time believing spanos and davis will come up with a better stadium plan in carson.

    while raider nation has a strong fan base i believe they are largely irrelevant in the eyes of corporate sponsors. i don’t think the owners will shed too many tears if the raider brand is gone. meanwhile they can draw upon a strong ram brand in los angeles. yeah it was a long time ago but it makes for good nostalgia. there’s a strong connection there.

    so what happens with the raiders. like i said. the nfl doesn’t need the raider brand anymore. they can rebrand them as the stallions and send them to st louis. a natural rivalry can be established in missouri with the chiefs. the preseason rivalry was nice but largely irrelevant but now you get a true division rivalry between kansas city and st louis in the afc west. that’s something corporate sponsors could get behind? i think so. it’s something fans in missouri could definitely get behind. rams niners rivalry? sure. but i’m not sure st louis fans really truly got behind that.

    does that sound like something the league would get behind? to me it makes sense. just a hunch.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i just remember how fisher kept telling thomas there was no way the rams were trading sam. flat out denied it. we all know what happened.

    so do i think the league can pull the rug out from under st. louis while saying in public that they will not abandon them? absolutely.

    in reply to: Fisher, 3/26 … transcript #21592
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    does it simplify the protection schemes?

    They didn’t say anything about changing schemes.

    It was all about terminology and volume. I assume that means volume of terms you need to know to know a given play?

    i wonder what that means for tavon. will that unleash tavon? if he doesn’t need to know as much on a given play?

    in reply to: Fisher, 3/26 … transcript #21580
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    does it simplify the protection schemes? or does that pretty much stay the same?

    they just need to protect the qb and run the ball better. that’ll take care of a lot of problems.

    in reply to: Amari Cooper ran 4.31 to 4.37, not 4.42 at combine #21514
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah. i would like cooper. even a 4.42 cooper. plus he’s got the big hands! ha!

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think the rams end up re-signing barksdale. then they could spend a first or second rounder and a stud offensive lineman. i think that fifth spot can be filled with a low level free agent or from within. now they should still add depth. but as far as the starting five i think it should be relatively easy to do. robinson and saffold will be studs i think.

    in reply to: I hate Goodell #21509
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well if we’ve learned anything it’s that the nfl has no integrity.

    Well, i am not sure there is such a thing
    as a mega-corporation with ‘integrity’ — but
    i shall spare us all
    my speech on that…

    A lot of fans have already figured out
    you haf ta kinda follow the ‘players/team’
    and not the ‘Corporate-NFL/Owners’
    Its tricky but it can be done.

    A lot of California ram fans managed
    to do that when Georgia moved the team.
    A lot of Missouri fans may learn to do
    that if the Rams move back.

    We need to start passing out ‘Nomad”
    t-shirts or somethin.

    w
    v

    or some fans have that feeling of pride in their city. and not necessarily the players or the owners.

    for me it’s the horns on the helmet.

    with the cardinals. it’s the birds on the bat.

    now if the rams get rid of those horns. that will crush me.

    in reply to: I hate Goodell #21495
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well if we’ve learned anything it’s that the nfl has no integrity.

    i mean i wouldn’t mind seeing the rams in los angeles but this is all very unfortunate. lots of st louis rams fans here and it would suck to see them go.

    anyway i think the league has seen kroenke’s plans. i think this is what they’ve been waiting for and they are going to do everything they can to make it happen. the rams already have a fan base there. it’s the plan that has the greatest chance to succeed. and that stadium is going to be an absolute spectacle.

    i still think st louis gets a team. maybe not immediately but somehow they will.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
Viewing 30 posts - 6,091 through 6,120 (of 6,770 total)