Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 5,881 through 5,910 (of 6,770 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well mcdonald has all the physical ability in the world. if he could really break out this season, that would be huge like i said before. he does seem to fit that hybrid safety linebacker role that williams covets. i guess the same inconsistency that plagued the defense last year affected mcdonald as well. and maybe after a year williams will really hone in on what mcdonald does well and kind of accentuate that.

    here’s another article.

    http://cover32.com/rams/2014/12/09/t-j-mcdonald-has-been-an-important-part-of-the-st-louis-rams-improved-defense/

    McDonald’s Pro Football Focus rating through Week 8, the Kansas City game, was -11.3, which ranked him 82nd out of 83 safeties in the NFL. According to PFF, McDonald was giving up a nearly perfect 153.1 quarterback rating to opposing quarterbacks and was responsible for giving up four touchdowns, tied for worst in the league among safeties.

    Since then, McDonald has been a completely different player, and you can’t help but wonder if his improved performance directly correlates with the Rams’ suffocating defense.

    Since Week 9, when the Rams beat the 49ers 13-10, McDonald’s PFF rating is +15.0, by far the best among NFL safeties. He ranks at or near the top of nearly every category, including run defense, pass defense and quarterback rating given up, which is down to a stingy 70.1 over that six-game span. McDonald also has an interception and three passes defended over this six-game span, two categories in which he put up a goose egg in the first seven games.

    Read more at http://cover32.com/rams/2014/12/09/t-j-mcdonald-has-been-an-important-part-of-the-st-louis-rams-improved-defense/#ZHtAxiRlLDPhHsBQ.99

    what i get from this thread is that there seems to be a lot of young guys poised to break out at the same time.

    on defense alone.

    quinn – 5th year
    donald – 2nd year
    ogletree – 3rd year
    mcdonald – 3rd year

    plus you’ve got guys like gaines and joyner who could be solid contributors. guys who are only going to be sophomores.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    that was some elite ball grabbing there.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    can someone tell me more about mcdonald? any articles? how is he ranked among strong safeties in the nfl right now?

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i like the lists.

    myself.

    quinn
    donald
    ogletree
    robinson

    gurley is a rookie, and he hasn’t proven himself healthy yet.

    i’m surprised people have picked mcdonald. if he can, and i don’t know either way, that would be huge. that would huge for this defense.

    in reply to: Rams' Hayes and Long go 'undercover' for ESPN #25627
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    not exactly about homelesness. but john angelos of the baltimore orioles made a very bold statement about the systemic problems affecting impoverished americans across this nation.

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-john-angelos-riots-20150508-story.html#page=2

    John Angelos’ tweets patched together

    …speaking only for myself i agree with your point that the principle of peaceful, non-violent protest and the observance of the rule of law is of utmost importance in any society. MLK, Gandhi, Mandela, and all great opposition leaders throughout history have always preached this precept. Further, it is critical that in any democracy investigation must be completed and due process must be honored before any government or police members are judged responsible. That said, my greater source of personal concern, outrage and sympathy beyond this particular case is focused neither upon one night’s property damage nor upon the acts group [sic] but is focused rather upon the past four-decade period during which an American political elite have shipped middle class and working class jobs away from Baltimore and cities and towns around the US to 3rd world dictatorships like China and others plunged tens of millions of good hard working Americans into economic devastation and then followed that action around the nation by diminishing every American’s civil rights protections in order to control an unfairly impoverished population living under an ever-declining standard of living and suffering at the butt end of an ever-more militarized and aggressive surveillance state. The innocent working families of all backgrounds whose lives and dreams have been cut short by excessive violence, surveillance, and other abuses of the bill of rights by government pay the true price, an ultimate price, and one that far exceeds the importance of any kids’ game played tonight, or ever, at Camden Yards. We need to keep in mind people are suffering and dying around the US and while we are thankful no one was injured at Camden Yards, there is a far bigger picture for poor Americans in Baltimore and everywhere who don’t have jobs and are losing economic civil and legal rights and this is makes inconvenience at a ball game irrelevant in light of the needless suffering government is inflicting upon ordinary Americans.

    Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun

    in reply to: Donald 2014: all the awards & some highlights #25619
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think his production was consistent once he started. before and after chris long.

    he and robert quinn are obviously the foundation for this defense. just need ogletree and one of the defensive backs to emerge as difference makers. and i think this defense has a chance to be special. should be fun to watch.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    my only hope is that foles plays well enough to play winning football this season. and that mannion is good enough that they don’t have to pay foles after this season.

    seahawks sure got lucky with russell wilson.

    in reply to: more on Gurley #25605
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i do also wonder how much of a product of the sytem he was. nick chubb actually outperformed him as a freshman last year. then again. nick chubb might actually be that good.

    in reply to: more on Gurley #25604
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah. there’s a big if. but he’s got some things going for him all things considered. he’s at about the right age. not too young but not too old either. the damage was minimal.

    but yeah. i personally won’t feel completely comfortable with it until he’s able to play 5 healthy years. and it’s gotta be 5 productive years.

    oh to be a fly on the wall in the rams trainer’s room.

    in reply to: happy birthday TSRF #25597
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    happy birthday. and may you have many more.

    in reply to: Indiginous populations and climate-change-policy #25584
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    not to worry. in about 100 years, robots will take over. humans will be wiped from existence. and none of this will matter anymore.

    in reply to: What's the deal with ACLs? #25551
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    there is something to that i think. muscles can get bigger. ligaments don’t. i wonder if maybe gurley could do with taking some weight off.

    gurley was listed at 230 pounds in college. he weighed in at 220 pounds at the combine. maybe he should stay at 220 pounds. put less stress on that knee when he cuts.

    in reply to: causes for optimism? #25497
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah. rams need to take care of the ball on offense. not just touchdowns given up but just turnovers that put the defense in bad field position. stop putting the defense in a hole.

    and if they can sustain more drives. and if the young guys on defense can improve.

    this defense should be a top 5 defense easily.

    in reply to: Steven Wyche & others on relocation #25493
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Just a P.S.

    In Bernie’s piece about the marketing survey in St. Louis, he mentioned a survey – not only of fans – but of corporations.

    You can bet the NFL is doing that in LA, too.

    Which stadium/team do you like better? How much will you pay for a suite? How much will you pay to have the stadium named after you? How much will you pay, pay, pay for this, this, this?

    And they are going to add up all the dollars from Inglewoodland, and all the dollars from Carson, and if there is a clear winner, then there is a clear winner. And that you can take to the bank.

    laram commented on this. they did do a survey in los angeles, and i think the rams and chargers came out on top. i’m not sure who was the more favorable of the two but the raiders definitely came last.

    i’m not sure which site was more favorable although i don’t know that carson was actually in play at the time. maybe it was. but i can’t see how carson would be a more favorable site among sponsors. supposedly carson is the more favorable site within the nfl. but if the corporate dollars speak out in favor of inglewood, i’d imagine they’d change their minds very quickly.

    my guess is inglewood would be more favorable among corporate sponsors. geographically it’s just closer to los angeles proper than carson. you have venice, santa monica, west los angeles, beverly hills, brentwood close by. leimert park, baldwin hills, and inglewood itself are undergoing massive gentrification. it’s also going to be closer to the concert venues they have planned in that area. it’s going to be a bigger attraction among young people with money to spend. carson isn’t.

    so who does the league choose? i would think inglewood, but i’m not so sure anymore.

    and can the chargers take on this stadium project by themselves? i really don’t think the raiders will be of any help. if spanos is going to do it, he’s going to have to do it with the help of goldman sachs. and even then there’s some question as to whether their plan will work. a lot of it is dependent on the sale of psls.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 5 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’m looking at an approximation of what the rams could look like in 2015, so i look at the 2011 san francisco 49ers. that’s what i’m thinking the rams offense could look like.

    they ranked 11th in scoring. 26th in total offense.

    their qb was alex smith at the time.

    overall passing totals were
    451 attempts 277 completions 61.4% 2930 yards 7.1 ypa 18 tds 5 ints 91.4 passer rating

    they ranked 31st in attempts. 29th in yards.

    their top 2 running backs that year were frank gore and kendall hunter.

    overall rushing totals were
    498 attempts 2044 yards 4.1 ypa 14 tds

    they ranked 3rd in attempts. 8th in yards.

    i think that’s a good profile to go off of. how far this team goes depends on how good the defense is.

    in reply to: What's the deal with ACLs? #25490
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Another study, by Dr. James Andrews, the orthopedic surgeon who performed Adrian Peterson’s reconstruction, found that of 49 NFL players operated on at his clinic from 2001 to 2006, only 64 percent returned to action. Some outstanding backs, like Jamaal Anderson and Terrell Davis, never returned to previous form.

    i want to add onto this. this number is misleading. this says nothing about any additional damage that might have been done to the knee. the meniscus. the mcl. the lcl. the pcl. these could also have been damaged. terrell davis for example tore both his acl and mcl. and those number i believe include all knee injuries that might have included the acl. gurley by all accounts had a straight acl tear. no additional damage, so i believe that the 64% is a little low as it pertains to gurley.

    but also. it is a risk. this isn’t like tommy john surgery where some pitchers actually come back stronger. there’s no telling what gurley has lost until we see him on a field.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i expect a lot of power running but power running with its share of explosive plays. mason and gurley both have the explosion the running game has lacked since a young steven jackson. but i also expect to see some more of those jet sweeps with tavon, and i think they could be even more effective with defenses so focused on gurley. i’m expecting around 450 carries total to be divided up among everyone.

    in the passing game i’m expecting foles to do a good job spreading the ball around to the tight ends and wide receivers. even the running backs should have their fair share of receptions. and if foles can run play action and the running game is as dominant as expected things should open up downfield.

    in reply to: Wagoner and others on puttin the OL together #25445
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i was wondering if anyone posted this. wow. strong words from boudreau, and he doesn’t seem the type to just toss around compliments like that. he’s on my short list of rams players to watch this season. i think this guy could be special.

    and i want to add that it’s not just the athleticism. he’s smart as well. and he’s got that boudreau temperament.

    in reply to: Wagoner: receiver is Rams' biggest weakness? #25419
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t know enough about coates except that he’s a physical specimen. his hands were his biggest question.

    i guess they’re banking on 2 of quick, bailey, and austin to break out this season. i can only hope they know what they’re doing.

    in reply to: Wagoner: receiver is Rams' biggest weakness? #25414
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i was hoping that cooper or white might fall to number 10 but it never happened.

    although i do think gurley could have a bigger impact than those 2. and i still think it’s a young group with potential to get better.

    overall though i’d have to say oline is the biggest weakness.

    in reply to: more on Gurley #25319
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    can’t say enough how excited i am about gurley. not just because he’s a running back but because he’s potentially a guy you can build an offense around like the article says. he’s the type who can make everyone around him better. the type defenses have to scheme for. it’s been awhile since the rams had anyone with that potential.

    in reply to: Steven Wyche & others on relocation #25271
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    a lot of it would apparently be done through psls. that relocation fee could be financed partly through that. some doubt it can actually be done. especially a team entering a new market although it could be argued that being in san diego they have a regional presence.

    http://www.latimes.com/business/realestate/la-fi-stadium-goldman-20150524-story.html

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 5 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Steven Wyche & others on relocation #25270
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I’m not even sure I understand the principle
    behind the “relocation fee.” Why, exactly
    does one owner have to pay the other owners money
    in order to move a team? Whats the logic there?
    I mean if the League makes a bit ‘more’ money
    with a team in LA — then shouldnt ‘they’
    pay Kroenke to move to LA ?

    w
    v

    From JT:

    The relocation fee is designed to compensate club owners for allowing another team to move into a new, lucrative market and basically gets split up among the other teams

    “Compensation.” So…extortion, basically.

    I haven’t thought much about this before, but now that it has been brought up, I’m stumped. How do Spanos and Davis pay this?

    goldman sachs somehow finances it. don’t ask me how. there’s a rumor floating around that spanos with the help of goldman sachs would be able to do the move himself. but then why include oakland in the first place? sounds fishy.

    in reply to: Pro Football Outsiders on defensive broken tackles #25233
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    not sure exactly what to make of this. the top defenses weren’t necessarily the best tacklers although at first glance the rams certainly need to get better.

    what exactly does the defense need to do to get in the top 5? that needs to be a goal this season.

    football outsiders ranks them number 9 overall.

    in reply to: Steven Wyche & others on relocation #25192
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    it does make a lot of sense.

    just from an alignment point of view it creates a divisional rivalry between kansas city and st louis. and while the broncos raiders rivalry isn’t what it once was there is a bigger geographical tie between the 2 under that scenario.

    i’m reading now that rumors of a forced davis sale are slightly exaggerated but might that also be a factor? maybe a group of investors offers to help davis out while still being able to have majority ownership.

    but also a scenario in which the raiders and chargers move to carson my preference would be to see the rams move to the afc west. a st louis kansas city rivalry would be the bee’s knees.

    in reply to: alec ogletree #25184
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/02/10/sig-stats-tackling-efficiency-lbs/

    he graded out as one of the least efficient tacklers among 4-3 outside linebackers. he missed a whopping 20 tackles.

    interestingly enough laurinaitis graded out as the most efficient tackler among inside linebackers.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i was wrong about tavon. i predicted he’d take a big step forward this year.

    zac stacy. i thought he and mason would provide a great running back tandem.

    sam bradford. i thought 2014 would finally be the year he would put it all together.

    in reply to: Happy birthday RFL #25144
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    happy birthday, rfl!

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    they’re going to make a documentary about this someday. all the rumors, conspiracy theories, backroom dealings, politics…

    should be entertaining.

    in reply to: Relocation, relocation, relocation #25133
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    somewhat misleading. all zelasko and johnson do is throw out some rumor that there was an 8 to 10 vote in favor of a rams move, but they make it clear they don’t know where this vote came from. they only suppose it’s from the finance committee because of the ten total votes. they also throw out a rumor that mayor butts supposedly said gave a cryptic answer when someone asked if there would be an announcement in August about the rams moving to los angeles, which he completely denied saying later.

    so no real information here other than rumor mongering.

Viewing 30 posts - 5,881 through 5,910 (of 6,770 total)