Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 901 through 930 (of 1,112 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: unfolding news, Bailey shot, not life threatening #34671
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    What?! Oh wow.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Blame for Rams' abysmal offense starts with Fisher #34632
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Maybe having a first year play caller in Cignetti mixed in with all this personnel upheaval isn’t all that helpful either. Pointing at the ineffectiveness of the QB position is easy when diagnosing the overall ineptness of most NFL offenses, but the Rams truly have a perfect storm of factors to include in the diagnosing of their problems this year.

    I caught he end of Jim Miller discussing the Rams offense yesterday on Sirius and he pointed to the static nature of the Rams offense. He was noting a lack of pre-snap reads by both QBs and pointed to a lack of shifts and motion as evidence. He was adamant that both Foles and Keenum were missing the most basic of personal reads. He was also speculating about Cignetti being a first year NFL play caller and the overall impact that is having.

    in reply to: Pathetic (post-Ravens game thread) #34579
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    I heard that Mason and Battle were inactive because they missed the bus to the plane?

    Battle too?? Oh wow! There are already questions about your character and you miss your ride to the job-site on the day of your first big work project? Sometimes I’m left completely confused by humans.

    in reply to: Keenum– concussion #34578
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Sure made wonder how they have the spotter do his/her job. Does this person sit up in a booth with binoculars? Are they on the sideline? There was a Rams game early in the season where a timeout was called by the ATC spotter and to me the injury was far less obvious. It’s a big area that the spotter has to cover with his or her eyes. So I can see how some instances could go unnoticed. Having the benefit of a tv camera pointed right at Keenum made yesterday’s example obvious for viewers. Still, given Case’s reaction it’s surprising that he stayed out there, or was allowed to stay out there.

    in reply to: QB Change #34237
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    I see that both Williams and Brown suffered season ending injuries on the Foles INT late in the game. Thankfully Havenstein was already out with his calf injury so he managed to avoid a season ending injury trying to make a tackle. So in case you’re counting that’s 3 injured o-linemen in yesterday’s game. I don’t know how much time Havenstein misses, but calf injuries are tough on a big guy. Next week it will be Barnes and Robinson at their regular positions. I’m guessing Reynolds is at RT and it will be two new guards. Wichmann and Rhaney/Donnal? Battle will likely be dressed as a back up. Some things never change. Fun times.

    in reply to: Is this the most disappointing loss ? #34198
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    No. All losses to division opponents are in the running for first as most disappointing for me. This was a brutal loss, no doubt, but John Fox has a history of getting a lot out of his teams. Cutler has had his struggles during his career, but he’s also had some pretty respectable seasons and in recent weeks he’s been stringing together some solid moments. In the Fisher era last year’s Monday nighter vs the Niners is probably my most disappointing loss. This year the loss to Washington is my most disappointing.

    in reply to: Brown–leg fracture #34142
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    I feel badly for Brown, obviously, but I also feel sorry for Foles. He must be sick about this injury to Brown.

    in reply to: Will the Rams beat the Bears? #34059
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Cutler has been playing well in recent weeks, Foles has been playing poorly since week one. Given that and the fact that the Bears have a good defense would normally be enough for me to say with confidence that the Bears will win this game. Add in that the dome will be full of Bears fans and it is even more incentive to pick the Chicago. However, the Bears are coming off of a short week and had to travel to and from San Diego in that time. Also, Quinn is returning and Havenstein will be back at RT and Reynolds will be a guard and Donnal will not be playing. Those facts at least offer a glimmer of hope.

    • This reply was modified 9 years ago by Avatar photocanadaram.
    in reply to: Tweets + Bailey replaced by Welker #33860
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Bailey’s lack of offensive production has been one ofmy biggest disappointments about this year’s Rams. Now this. Oh well. This certainly leaves a hole ST coverage units though.

    Walker hasn’t looked good in the last few seasons that I’ve seen him play. Thus he’ll likely fit right in on this offense. Hope his brain stays unscathed.

    in reply to: No playoffs this year (reactions to the Vikes game) #33796
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Sometimes I wonder if Keenum could do any worse than Foles. I guess it’s certainly possible. For the most part Foles hasn’t been a turnover machine this year. Maybe Keenum comes in a starts turning it over. Hard to know with Keenum’s small sample size of NFL starts.

    Anyway, I’m not calling for Keenum to start. I’d like to see Foles be given the chance to work through this and at least put together a couple of average performances. I’d be pleased if Foles had consecutive games with 2 td passes while competing 60% of his passes. I don’t know if Keenum is capable of doing that in this offense right now. At times I just find it mind numbing to watch this offense. Foles really is playing some back up quality football right now, at least that’s what I think.

    in reply to: Prediction thread – Minnesota Vikings – out of doors #33610
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    According to the most recent forecast that I looked at they’re expecting a high of 14 degrees Celsius and a low of 6 degrees Celsius on game day in Minneapolis. The game takes place on the 8th day of the 11th month of the year. The logical thing to do is to find the sum of the high temperature and the day of the month, and then find the sum of the low temperature and the 11th month of the year, 14+8=22 and 6+11=17.

    The Rams defense racks up 11 safeties in a 22-17 win.

    in reply to: Color Rush #33295
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    That jersey looks like it would be a good high visibility top for a highway worker.

    • This reply was modified 9 years ago by Avatar photocanadaram.
    in reply to: Not clear yet if McDonald will play #33277
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    No Peter Giunta.

    LOL. That’s a shame, a damn shame.

    in reply to: 2016 NFL Draft order and needs for every team #33078
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    A LB might be a need as well.

    in reply to: 2016 NFL Draft order and needs for every team #33077
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    So strange to have to scroll down so far to find the Rams. I hope that continues. Hard to disagree with that assessment. I’d be ok with a receiving TE early, if there is one worthy of picking.

    in reply to: official Browns game response thread #32933
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    My response is that it makes me happy when the Rams win. To see the defense playing so well sparks joy in my heart. To see Gurley dominating makes me feel smart for fist pumping and exclaiming “yes!” when the Rams drafted him on April 30, 2015. The Rams WRs might not get open that often, but from what I can see from the network cameras they are blocking well downfield.

    Yay Rams.

    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    This seems like one of those jinx articles that result in something happening to Bradford very soon preventing him from playing the rest of the season. I hope Sam fairs better tonight than he did the last time he was in Carolina.

    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    I like when teams keep an area of strength a strength. So going DE early would be fine with me.

    in reply to: going to watch a game or games Sunday? which? #32581
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    I watched the Browns game. I thought they looked pretty good vs. Denver. The Rams will need to figure out how to contain Gary Barnidge. Just like I thought they would When the schedule come out back in April. 😁

    I’m glad that he Browns had an emotional game, but I’d rather the Rams be facing them coming off an emotional win. Hopefully the Browns are drained either way. Personally, I see the Rams having their work cut out for them vs Cleveland.

    in reply to: Saffold decides on shoulder surgery & other tweets #32420
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    That finger probably didn’t help Kendricks on a couple of those dropped balls. Just say’n.

    in reply to: Rams schedule after the bye & how it looks #32230
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Yes, the Rams gotta come out water pistols a spraying after the bye. Right now this version of Fisher’s Rams seems better in some areas, but continue be worrisome in other areas. While Cleveland is a winnable game I can see them losing to the Browns. If that happens I Predict that this team will finish 6-10.

    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/rams-conservative-plan-limits-packers-offense-b99594369z1-331958621.html?ipad=y

    Rams Conservative Plan Limits Packers Offense

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 1 month ago by Avatar photocanadaram.
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Hard to predict how much better the o-line will play, but as the season progresses I doubt they play much worse than they did today. I gotta say that it’s difficult to feel confident about the passing game in general though. Given the inconsistency of the offense I think it’s probable that some losses to mediocre teams will continue to annoy and perplex Rams fans.

    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Holy crap, this seems too crazy to be true!

    Maybe this will inspire some billionaires, or corporations to care about the planet. I’m not holding my breath, however.

    BTW, I nominate nittany’s Hulk post for post of the year.

    in reply to: Office Pool #32104
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Barron

    I agree, but since you already picked him I will pick Ayers. When it comes to getting to Rodgers I think the Rams d-line has a tough day today.

    in reply to: Nick Fairley #32005
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    I listened to the Rams broadcast of the Arizona game. On a couple of Chris Johnson’s long runs D’marco Farr called out Fairly for not maintaining his gap. When I rewatched the game it wasn’t quite as obvious to me, but I didn’t have time to slow things down and watch plays over-and-over.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 1 month ago by Avatar photocanadaram.
    in reply to: Calais Campbell wired in Arz game #31997
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Good to hear Johnny Hekker not putting up with the big man’s trash talk.

    in reply to: Rams expected to sign Dunbar #31808
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Makes sense. They could do worse.

    in reply to: Tweets 10/5 #31807
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Given he percentage of plays that Britt was in for I think it’s safe to say that Patrick Peterson had himself a nice day.

    in reply to: WOW … (official Cards game after-thread) #31748
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    On Gurley’s 52 yard run Cook was the H-back. He actually made a decent block on his man who was backside pursuit. Then he stood and watched, but Gurley was way down field by that point. After cursing them for the last 3 weeks I’m warming up to those stretch the field running plays.

Viewing 30 posts - 901 through 930 (of 1,112 total)