Rams beat ARZ reaction thread

[zn]

That was one wild game.

.

[Agamemnon]

It is good to be 3 and 1. 🙂

Agamemnon

[Agamemnon]

Austin’s punt return, Gurley’s catch, Keenum and Quick’s pass catch, all big on the last drive for a TD.

It is clear though, that the Rams’ offense needs to improve and a couple penalties killed them. Good thing they were able to overcome them.

Agamemnon

[TSRF]

Wow and wow!

Damn those Jets! I thought they were better than they showed.

Isn’t it funny that when you go to ESPN Standings, the Seahawks are #1 and the Rams are #2. Even though the Rams beat them head to head.

3-1; can’t remember the last time…

[zn]

TSRF wrote:

3-1; can’t remember the last time…

2006

[canadaram]

How incredible is Aaron Donald? He continues to amaze me.

All Brian Quick does is catch touchdowns.

[nittany ram]

Case Keenum has his limitations, but he is a gamer. He’s like a really good version of Austin Davis.

[sdram]

Fun game. Rams players are making a few plays at the right time. Like the intensity and the pass rush. Gaines looked great at first glance in the backfield. TruJo played like the stud CB the Rams think he is. Keenum, Quick\Britt\Austin\Gurley made just enough plays. Offense needs to run block better. Fisher needs to figure out who to trust on replay challenges.

[NERam]

Any day that the Rams win and the Pats lose, especially a shutout, is a good day. Pie and cake should be eaten in great volumes this week.

Seeing Gurley getting stuffed so often is getting tiring. I DO hope they can find a way to loosen the shackles soon.

#73 had 2 huge, game changing, penalties in the 2nd half. This offense isn’t potent enough yet to absorb that kind of crap.

Who the heck is wearing #83? Is that the old Quick? Cant help but think that Spruce and Cooper have a prodding effect on him.

All in all, a good game. I think Nittany was saying last week that these close finishes are rough to watch. I tend to agree. If I had more faith in the offense, maybe it wouldn’t be so bad. But when an opposing score late in the game could spell LOSS, I get a little antsy. Maybe throwing to Gurley more might have continued success.

[InvaderRam]

was gaines the difference for this d? sounds like this d was a lot more consistent than the first three games. wasn’t able to watch it. only heard it.

but shoot. from beginning to end. it sounded like the rams d had the cards offense contained. i hope this lasts.

and keenum again did enough to get another win. shoot. sounds like he did more than just good enough. he played well. he’s making defenses pay. now hopefully this gets gurley going in the future.

[PA Ram]

This was a good day. First the wife calls from work and says she’s hungry for stromboli so we skip the diet today and hit the pizza shop! And then—the Rams win!!!!!!

This team just does not make it easy—but a win is a win is a win.

At 3-1, don’t look for Goff any time soon. I have to wonder if Keenum is the game manager the Rams needed, and if they had not traded for Goff and drafted a Will Fuller instead, and another lineman, and had the picks for next year…well–maybe that would be enough.

Doesn’t matter.

3-1 feels great.

Not only that–they have beaten the cards and Seahawks each once. At best those teams can only even the series this year. And the Cards are in a world of hurt right now.

So anyway—how bout that Brian Quick–eh?

I’m just going to enjoy this for now. Feels good.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

[InvaderRam]

are they finally learning?

looks like it. looks like could extend this streak some too.

[wv]

Two road wins in a row. When’s the last time ‘that’ happened?

Outstanding win. They are learning. Slowly. Its still quite Ugly
on offense, but its fun watching this team emerge.

Bills
at Detroit
Giants

w
v

[bnw]

I’m very happy with the win but the penalties will kill our chance for the playoffs. Can’t win games with so many penalties.

The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

Sprinkles are for winners.

[Zooey]

Good to have Gaines back, and I don’t think it is a coincidence that TruJo finally turned in a good game with Gaines on the other side. I didn’t see Joyner all day (though he was credited with 4 tackles), nor much Hill.

The Gurley situation is a bit frustrating, as are untimely penalties.

The Rams have mastered Bend, don’t Break, it seems. They seem to give up a lot, but come up with the stop eventually.

Arizona got a few bruises today. Is it just me, or do the Rams seem to send an uncommon number of Cardinals to the training room every time they play?

Well, 3-1 is not a bad place to be at the quarter pole, especially since that opening game clunker. It seems like the Rams get a little better every week.

Fun fact: The Rams have been outscored 76 – 63 in the four games.

[zn]

wv wrote:

Two road wins in a row. When’s the last time ‘that’ happened?

The last time the Rams won 2 consecutive road games was in 2010.

November 28 @ Denver Broncos 36-33
December 5 @ Arizona Cardinals 19-6

I remember the Denver game, it featured a couple of big plays from Danario Alexander. Big game for Bradford–he threw for 308 yards and 3 TDs with no INTs.

The Arz game was back when that team didn’t have qbs. Both Derek Anderson and John Skelton took snaps at qb in that game. Then rookie UDFA Max Hall got in for a few plays to be sacked silly. And, I had to look all that up.

[Agamemnon]

Denver is the only team with 4 wins. Phil and Minn are 3 and 0.

Agamemnon

[nittany ram]

Oh to be able to play that 9’ers game over again.

At season’s end the Rams will be sitting at 15-1 and looking to make history but for that anomalous blip at the start of the year.

I know what you’re thinking, “14-2? Possibly. 13-3? Most assuredly. But 15-1?”

Bet the house.

15-1.

[zn]

nittany ram wrote:

Oh to be able to play that 9’ers game over again.

At season’s end the Rams will be sitting at 15-1 and looking to make history but for that anomalous blip at the start of the year.

I know what you’re thinking, “14-2? Possibly. 13-3? Most assuredly. But 15-1?”

Bet the house.

15-1.

You know what’s looking like now with the SF game?

It was a wake-up call.

New team leadership. They acted dramatically on it, called a players only meeting, and they turned that game into a wake-up.

You know what it’s also looking like. The offensive changes were enough so that they were essentially learning it again. Less carry over from last year. Now they are picking it up and getting in stride. More 2nd nature.

[bnw]

nittany ram wrote:

Oh to be able to play that 9’ers game over again.

At season’s end the Rams will be sitting at 15-1 and looking to make history but for that anomalous blip at the start of the year.

I know what you’re thinking, “14-2? Possibly. 13-3? Most assuredly. But 15-1?”

Bet the house.

15-1.

Rams 15-1? Absolutely. I will bet your house.

The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

Sprinkles are for winners.

[nittany ram]

bnw wrote:

nittany ram wrote:

Oh to be able to play that 9’ers game over again.

At season’s end the Rams will be sitting at 15-1 and looking to make history but for that anomalous blip at the start of the year.

I know what you’re thinking, “14-2? Possibly. 13-3? Most assuredly. But 15-1?”

Bet the house.

15-1.

Rams 15-1? Absolutely. I will bet your house.

I didn’t say ‘my’ house. I clearly said ‘the’ house, which obviously refers to zn’s house. I thought that was self-evident.

[wv]

nittany ram wrote:

I didn’t say ‘my’ house. I clearly said ‘the’ house, which obviously refers to zn’s house. I thought that was self-evident.

————-

Does that include the garden? Cause I’m not a hundred-percent-sure we should
be betting another man’s house AND garden.

w
v

[nittany ram]

zn wrote:

You know what’s looking like now with the SF game?

It was a wake-up call.

New team leadership. They acted dramatically on it, called a players only meeting, and they turned that game into a wake-up.

You know what it’s also looking like. The offensive changes were enough so that they were essentially learning it again. Less carry over from last year. Now they are picking it up and getting in stride. More 2nd nature.

Yes, that could all be true. Makes sense.

Seems like their changes set the running game back more than they anticipated. After what looked like a ‘light at the end of the tunnel’ moment regarding the running game in the second half of the Bucs game it looks like the tunnel collapsed against Arizona.

But, interestingly, going back to last season, Gurley has had only one 100 yard game in his last 12 games. And he’s had only two games where he averaged at least 4 yds/carry. So maybe his troubles have nothing to do with any changes made to the offense over the offseason. Maybe the Rams running game is just inherently weak due to what…poor run blocking, defenses not respecting the Rams passing game? Both? Neither?

• This reply was modified 7 years, 7 months ago by nittany ram.

[bnw]

nittany ram wrote:

bnw wrote:

nittany ram wrote:

Oh to be able to play that 9’ers game over again.

At season’s end the Rams will be sitting at 15-1 and looking to make history but for that anomalous blip at the start of the year.

I know what you’re thinking, “14-2? Possibly. 13-3? Most assuredly. But 15-1?”

Bet the house.

15-1.

Rams 15-1? Absolutely. I will bet your house.

I didn’t say ‘my’ house. I clearly said ‘the’ house, which obviously refers to zn’s house. I thought that was self-evident.

No it wasn’t and who wants to win a house in Maine in time for the winter?

The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

Sprinkles are for winners.

[nittany ram]

bnw wrote:

No it wasn’t and who wants to win a house in Maine in time for the winter?

Well, his house is on the coast of Maine. Mine is in Vermont.

His house will feel downright balmy compared to mine.

[joemad]

a big part of this team’s success has been about field position, with the help of special teams play.

Punting and punt coverage….. Hekker has pinned opponents; yesterday 2 punts in the 4th qtr pinned AZ inside the 20 (1 inside the 10) I believe Hekker hasn’t punted a Touchback this year yet… one of those punts went to waste with the horse collar tackle, but ultimately resulted in an INT.

Greg Zuerlein 5 for 5 in FGs thus far….. and perfect in XPs……he was difference vs Seattle and TB…. yesterday, his points were just as important.

Defense played great… came up big….. I think Tru Jo’s int was inconclusive and shouldn’t have been overturned…. anyway, TJ put the game way with a fair catch int to end the game….

Arizona’s defense is still tough and keyed on the Gurley, but the Rams still need to put drives together to consume the clock and put games away.

Fisher needs to use his replay “get out of jail free cards” a bit more wisely……

[bnw]

joemad wrote:

a big part of this team’s success has been about field position, with the help of special teams play.

Punting and punt coverage….. Hekker has pinned opponents; yesterday 2 punts in the 4th qtr pinned AZ inside the 20 (1 inside the 10) I believe Hekker hasn’t punted a Touchback this year yet… one of those punts went to waste with the horse collar tackle, but ultimately resulted in an INT.

Greg Zuerlein 5 for 5 in FGs thus far….. and perfect in XPs……he was difference vs Seattle and TB…. yesterday, his points were just as important.

Defense played great… came up big….. I think Tru Jo’s int was inconclusive and shouldn’t have been overturned…. anyway, TJ put the game way with a fair catch int to end the game….

Arizona’s defense is still tough and keyed on the Gurley, but the Rams still need to put drives together to consume the clock and put games away.

Fisher needs to use his replay “get out of jail free cards” a bit more wisely……

Yes, good points.

The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

Sprinkles are for winners.

[Zooey]

joemad wrote:

I think Tru Jo’s int was inconclusive and shouldn’t have been overturned….

I’ve said before, and I will say it again: I like the college rule better that requires just one foot in bounds.

I think that’s the only thing I like about college football (besides Notre Dame losing; I am happy when they suffer).

But I don’t like the two-feet down rule. I say, you’re in if you touch the field in bounds at all. And if I was commissioner for a day, by golly, I would change that rule and walk out satisfied.

[InvaderRam]

nittany ram wrote:

Maybe the Rams running game is just inherently weak due to what…poor run blocking, defenses not respecting the Rams passing game? Both? Neither?

well i wonder too. might there be something going on with gurley? is he not seeing the holes?

[wv]

Zooey wrote:

joemad wrote:

I think Tru Jo’s int was inconclusive and shouldn’t have been overturned….

I’ve said before, and I will say it again: I like the college rule better that requires just one foot in bounds.

I think that’s the only thing I like about college football (besides Notre Dame losing; I am happy when they suffer).

But I don’t like the two-feet down rule. I say, you’re in if you touch the field in bounds at all. And if I was commissioner for a day, by golly, I would change that rule and walk out satisfied.

————–
Ok well if you are going to turn this thread into a “What I’d Like To See” thread,
then I’d like to see the players use Jet-packs.

w
v

[Author]

Posts