Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 202 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams trade Cooks to Texans #113578
    Cal
    Participant

    my question is does mcvay want to continue with the 3 wr sets he had been using. or does he want to go to more 2 tight end sets like he had done with washington? reynolds i think could step up and at least partially fill the cooks role.

    or with this being a strong wr class, maybe he figures get a top wr if he’s available and build the offense around the talent you have?

    I predict plenty of 3 wide sets. Probably less than last year, but still a lot because Kupp is a good player and good things happen if a defense doesn’t focus on him.

    In the 2 games Cooks missed–@ Pitt & home vs the Bears–Reynolds had 6 catches for 104 yards. And he also had a 51 yard td catch called back against the Bears (if my memory is right) because Whit was a few inches from lining up correctly.

    Even without the big play, Reynolds was averaging a gaudy 17 ypc or so in Cooks’ role.

    Reynolds is still young–he’ll be 25 all year long. McVay might have a lot more confidence in Reynolds than most Rams fans.

    in reply to: Dealing with the BNMW crowd #113361
    Cal
    Participant

    I’ll vote green just like I did it 2016 because I like the perspective & sentiments from the Revolution Now post.

    That said, all the criticism of Biden’s gaffes and old-age moments doesn’t impress me. I watched an hour or so of the debate between just Biden and Bernie and waited for Biden to fall apart.

    He didn’t. He weaseled his way around Bernie’s attacks and had successful attacks of his own on Bernie’s votes against the Brady Bill. I was disappointed in Bernie. My wife, who doesn’t follow politics closely, just shook her head at the whole pathetic spectacle.

    In one of the recent MSNBC interviews, where The Hill or TYT were left incredulous by Biden’s old-age moments, Biden was fine for 90% of the interview. He does look bad at times, but some of the lefty critics are focusing on his bad highlights.

    Biden has many moments when he looks personable and charismatic. He’s no Mike Pence, Jeb Bush, or John Kerry. Biden’s more of a Case Keenum than a Russell Wilson, but he could win the big one with the right situation.

    in reply to: is this a rebuild year? or is it a touch-up? #113161
    Cal
    Participant

    The Rams relied on so many young players who were basically rookies last year I have to think 2020 will be better than 2019.

    Joseph-Day, Greg Gaines, Troy Reeder, Long, & Rapp were all rookies who got a lot of snaps last year. I can’t imagine the Rams will rely on that many rookies next year. That should make a big difference next year.

    Fowler had a nice season, but I’ve been a big fan of Okoronkwo since he was drafted. Obo looked good last year in limited snaps and I wouldn’t be surprised to see him put up some good numbers next year–as long as 99 is still playing on the line.

    Littleton is a good player, but the Rams do have a couple 3rd year guys to step in to his role with Kiser & Young. Littleton, btw, emerged as a good starter in his 3rd year after starring on special teams.

    Losing Weddle is addition by subtaction. He was just too sloooow last year.

    On offense, 2020 should be way better. The offensive line was just way too young last year. A year of growth for all of those young guys could be huge.

    Gurley last year wasn’t good. NFL running backs have to make guys miss and get yards after contact. I didn’t see that last year. Gurley didn’t have a play longer than 25 yards last year. Part of that was the o-line, but it was also Gurley.

    Unless Rams RB’s are really beat up, McVay will get more production in 2020 from the RB position than he did in 2019.

    in reply to: Ian Rapoport: Brockers back to Rams. #113116
    Cal
    Participant

    Kenneth Murray, btw, sounds like a perfect fit for this defense. It sure would be nice to have a Bobby Wagner-type player roaming the middle for the next 10 seasons.

    There’s also this from Murray’s draft profile:

    “Murray is the son of a preacher and takes pride in helping his parents raise three adopted siblings with special needs.”

    I kinda wish Snead hadn’t traded for Ramsey after thinking about some of the prospects towards the end of round 1.

    in reply to: Ian Rapoport: Brockers back to Rams. #113103
    Cal
    Participant

    I like Floyd–he’ll be a good addition on the edge in this division with Kyler Murray, Russell Wilson, and the Niner’s running / screen game. Floyd’s unique speed and athleticism will help against those teams.

    I don’t know how many OL the Rams can really add in the draft. They already have 7 or 8 guys that I bet they like with Whitworth, Corbett, Noteboom, Allen, Blythe, Edwards, Evans, and maybe Brewer.

    I know many don’t think much of Allen, but I recently watched some of the first games, and I thought he looked pretty good for a guy who was basically a rookie. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Rams see Allen as their center for the next 5 years.

    That said, they’ll probably trade up from 52 and grab a center in the draft!

    in reply to: Ian Rapoport: Brockers back to Rams. #113093
    Cal
    Participant

    dline is set. i think the defensive backfield is still strong especially with jj coming back.

    they don’t have linebackers or edge defenders.

    maybe kiser comes back healthy and ready?

    yikes.

    I’d be surprised if the Rams don’t add an ILB in their first 4 or 5 picks. But I also wouldn’t be surprised to see Kenny Young starting next year. He has already seen significant playing time in his year and a half with the Ravens so he has some experience.

    I’m guessing he was also a player Snead liked two years ago in the draft when Young was selected a round before Kiser. So I wouldn’t be surprised to see Kiser and Young as the starting ILB next year for game 1. They’re both young and inexperienced but with good Dline play in front of them they could be good.

    I’m thinking the Rams are good at Edge. I like Obo and am intrigued by Jachai Polite who will be just 22 this May. He’s already been released by two teams, but he’s so young he could easily have a bright future.

    in reply to: Exit poll discrepancy & other voter suppression news #112373
    Cal
    Participant

    I don’t know what to make of this. Sounds so Conspiracy Theory.

    And yet…before 2016, exit polls were really accurate.

    https://tdmsresearch.com/?fbclid=IwAR1hpB4ow568y2NLm_12wXxfKMVKWu89Xp-zbvp1i4zftvcY2JVeTtBGhI

    Someone looks like they’re messing with data to me. Washington Post’s breakdown based on exit polls from Texas looks like this: Men were 44% of the electorate and Sanders won 34% while Biden won 33%. Women were 56% of the electorate–Sanders won 27% while Biden won 33%.

    The final results from the election showed Biden won 35% of the votes while Bernie won 30% of the votes. In this case the exit polls looks like they were very accurate.

    Bernie certainly wasn’t receiving 42% of the votes according to the exit polls from Texas, as Zooey’s graphic shows.

    Americans had a chance to choose a truly progressive agenda championed by a consistently honest man or they could choose a typical, smooth talking, used-car-salesman-politician to represent the status quo.

    Our country chose the latter.

    in reply to: This President has got to go #112269
    Cal
    Participant

    Italy 2.6%
    China 3.5%
    Iran 10.6%

    USA is currently at 2.7% We’ve only conducted 7000 tests TOTAL in the entire US thus far.

    We have ZERO handle on this, Drs are SCREAMING about symptomatic patients not being able to get tested and NO ONE knowing what to do if they clearly have COVID.

    It is entirely possible using the 70% threshold and just Iran’s numbers (ours could be substantially worse considering the federal and state responses), we’re looking at potentially 24.4M DEAD.

    As bad as Trump’s gov’t is handling the covid crisis, I think it’s unwise to think even 1 million people die in the US from Covid.

    The country is taking the virus seriously now with schools, sports, and events being cancelled. Even though our system is incredibly screwed up because of Trump, there’s still lots of professionals who will do a good job. The US probably won’t come close to doing as good as Germany and South Korea. But Germany has 4,000 cases and 8 deaths. Yes EIGHT!

    So this virus is hardly the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic where millions died.

    And you can bet that Trump will be crowing about how well he managed the crisis.

    in reply to: eliz warren drops out #112000
    Cal
    Participant

    Whoaa Boy! Krystal Ball is one lucky lady. A throuple with wv and zooey!

    If I was Bernie I would stoke a generational conflict. Hell yes, young people and “Bernie Bros” should be upset.

    Older Americans are leaving future generations with climate change, crazy student debt, Donald Trump as president, and trillion dollar deficits without even using the debt to solve America’s numerous future problems.

    Sorry if a young person is mean to you on-line, but you are leaving us a complete disaster.

    in reply to: What Sanders needs to do now #111949
    Cal
    Participant

    Yeah its more nuanced than the MSM’s version.

    But Many African-Americans are apparently voting for Biden because of the connection with Obama. I dont think there’s much Bernie can do about that. I see all kinds of leftists advising him to ‘change his message’ somehow to fight Biden or attract Black voters — but I dunno what else he can do. Biden just has the Obama-Advantage, in the primaries, with Older and Southern Black-Voters.

    We KNOW those same voters would vote for Bernie if it was Trump vs Bernie.

    Looking at the details (collected by the MSM) I’m not sure it makes sense to say older black-voters. Bernie is losing by 30, 40, 50 points in the South. That kind of defeat can’t be explained by saying it’s just older voters unless you mean older than 29, which would be 80% of the voters.

    The lack of support from black, southern voters is a huge problem for Bernie and probably any progressive candidate. And it’s not new and happening just because of Biden’s connection to Obama. I remember–maybe incorrectly–the same thing happening in 2016 with Hillary. Losing by such a big margin with black voters in the South helped Hillary run up a large delegate lead over Bernie and history is repeating with Biden.

    And the percentages Bernie is losing by in the South are so big it seems meaningless to say it’s mainly older voters. Biden’s–and Hillary before him–dominance with black Southern voters is a big part of why Bernie will lose the nomination.

    Maybe you can say it’s older black voters in northern states because in places like Minnesota, Massachusetts, California Bernie exit polls indicate that Biden beat Bernie by a much, much smaller margin than in the South.

    in reply to: What Sanders needs to do now #111942
    Cal
    Participant

    Southern and older. That was true of Biden before the election. Same data shows younger black voters support him.

    And you list only southern states.

    I did list California. And exit polls also indicate that Biden beat Bernie straight up with black voters in Minnesota and Massachusetts.

    I don’t know what age range you are using, but right now it’s almost meaningless to say it’s only “older black, Southern voters.” Bernie is losing by more than 2 to 1 margin in the southern states. He will not win with that type of support. Maybe in 4 more years a progressive candidate will have a chance with black voters–but now? No way. It’s not happening.

    I’m not trying to dismiss Bernie or anything. I like him and I think Biden 2020 could easily be a repeat of 2016 when Trump branded Hillary as just another person to prop up the establishment.

    I’m just pointing out that Bernie has almost no chance to win this primary. And a big piece of that is black voters, especially southern black voters, support Biden instead Bernie by a huge percentage.

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 2 months ago by Cal.
    in reply to: What Sanders needs to do now #111933
    Cal
    Participant

    W as put that’s a false narrative. And we already know it is. It may be the line being pushed by mainstream media, which I bet is probably where you got this, but it’s false. (Surprise, imagine mainstream media misinforming people.)

    This is what actually happened. Sanders leads nationally with all minority voters.

    Where he DOES NOT lead is with a subset of older southern blacks.

    After Tuesday, I don’t know how you can say that Bernie doesn’t have a problem with black voters. There’s a ton of data, that shows over and over that black voters are voting for mainstream, establishment dems like Biden or Clinton in 2016.

    Just look at the exit poll data I just pulled from WaPo. State after state, Biden kicked Bernie’s ass with the black voters. Here’s some actual numbers, & I was generous and lumped Warren’s voters in with Bernie’s numbers.

    North Carolina: Biden 62% – Bernie/Warren 29%
    Texas: Biden 58% – Bernie/Warren 21%
    Virginia: Biden 69% – Bernie/Warren 22%
    Alabama: Biden 72% – Bernie/Warren 14%
    Even in California, Bernie didn’t win black voters. Biden 37% – Bernie/Warren 25%.

    So the idea that Bernie can’t win the black vote is not some misguided MSM narrative. That idea is based on result after result.

    If you look at the data, it’s clear this race is over. Bernie will win a number of remaining states (Washington, Oregon) but he’s not going to pile up enough huge victories to catch up to Biden, especially with all of the media support and momentum that Biden has behind him now.

    in reply to: super Tuesday thread #111886
    Cal
    Participant

    Nice summary by Krystal.

    When I watch that highlight vid of Biden I can’t help but think it’ll be 4 more years of Trump if Biden is the nominee–he sounds terrible at times.

    And if Biden is the nominee, he’ll have another 8 months of exhausting campaigning and media exposure to keep looking like he is old.

    I can just see Trump voters saying, “I don’t like Trump, but the country’s doing ok and Biden looks like he’s lost a lot.”

    in reply to: South Carolina #111796
    Cal
    Participant

    There’s a number of those conservative southern states where Bernie will struggle on Tuesday. Alabama, Tennessee, and Arkansas are all going to look like South Carolina I’d guess with Biden kicking Bernie’s ass.

    Biden’s popularity with black voters and conservative democrats makes me nervous about Texas, North Carolina, and Virginia, too.

    And then you have Mass and the possibility of Warren absorbing some of Bernie’s support from left-leaning democrats.

    It’ll be interesting to see what will happen.

    in reply to: A plea #111753
    Cal
    Participant

    Cal,

    Good post.

    I paid a few hundred a semester during my first go round in college back in the 1970s. I went back two more times, in two separate decades, and the price skyrocketed.

    This was a direct consequence of state and federal governments retreating on their support for Higher Ed. The wave of tax cut fever forced them to choose what to fund and what to de-fund, and education was all too often one of the main victims — that and programs for the poor, especially.

    This isn’t rocket science. We can reverse what we did and add a bit of support on top of that. And this is a must. Most of Europe offers free college tuition to its citizens, and a few of its countries will even cover costs overseas.

    We’re the richest nation on earth and we can’t at least do the same?

    Yes, I shouldn’t say the system is stupid. It’s operating exactly like the rich want it to. The rich and the political leaders have created a system where millions of nurses, teachers, policemen, etc. have to pay an extra 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 hundred bucks a month because it would be crazy to fund higher education by spending ONLY 10 times what Canada spends on our military.

    The middle class is absorbing the costs of the rising costs of college and housing and a ton of that money is flowing directly to the banks. Young people get this. Just look at Bernie’s popularity with the young voters.

    in reply to: A plea #111745
    Cal
    Participant

    “And I think that is because Sanders competes with Trump in the one category of voters that put Trump over the top, and that is anti-establishment votes.”

    There is truth to that. Except I heard a podcast where James Carville called this group the “I am a victim” segment not “anti establishment”. I also think most of you guys continue to forget about Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. That’s where this election, again, will be decided and I find it hard to fathom that these hard working people are going to go for someone who wants the government to take care of them. Furthermore, the Republicans-not just Trump-but up and down on the ballot will turn the democrats arguments for 2018 on its head and make the exact same argument-you will lose your precious private health care and your own personal physicians. And those voters in those precious three states will buy it.

    I am probably a little too old to say “Ok, Boomer” but that’s a damn good response to James Carville’s horseshit.

    Anyone who has any experience with college costs in the last 10 years or is looking at college costs for their kids in the near future know that Carville’s “victim” rhetoric is BS.

    Looking at my local university and what I payed 20 years ago, college costs have tripled in 20 years. Have wages kept pace? Hell,no.

    Millions of young people are emerging with $$20,000 in student loans (if they’re lucky). Who benefits from that? Banks.

    And then these kids can’t buy a house so they’re stuck paying ridiculous rent that also benefits the rich. Because they, of course, own the houses and are benefiting from the ridiculous spikes in housing costs.

    And this isn’t a problem only in California or New York. It’s happening everywhere including Wisconsin and Michigan. That’s why Bernie won the democratic primary in those states in 2016.

    Millions of normal people know the system is rigged against them. All of them might not understand the specifics, but they can feel it and they’re right.

    Banks are making are killing off the high price of college tuition. Guess what happens if your a college grad who goes to buy a house without 20% to put down? You get to pay the bank a higher interest rate AND you get to borrow more money from the bank because you have to pay $200 every month for your student loans.

    If the Democratic establishment wants to keep saying dumb things they just might lose to Trump in 2020. People know this current system is stupid and BS.

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 2 months ago by Cal.
    in reply to: Buttichex #111408
    Cal
    Participant

    The Long List of Reasons Why I Will Never Vote for Pete Buttigieg
    Ronald W. Dixon

    I’m not a Mayor Pete voter or anything, but the Buttigieg criticism seems a little over the top. A couple things about this list:

    1. Bulldozing homes. Some homes should be bulldozed–My brother-in-law recently moved away from New Orleans after his young children tested positive for lead because the conditions are shitty in New Orleans. There’s a number of good questions about Buttigieg’s actions here, but an important consideration is whether policies like this have had a noteworthy effect on South Bend’s crime rate.

    2. Letting Felons vote–Jeezus! The Republicans are basically run by fossil fuel companies and we’re facing grave threats from climate change, but the left wants to worry about making sure people IN jail get to vote.

    I know it’s a minor thing, but I saw Bernie do a town hall on Fox and Fox, of course, gave Bernie a question about letting people in jail vote. This kinda stuff is part (probably a reeaally small part) why we don’t have progressive policies in the US. To many voters, this idea is just nuts. Sure, people deserve the right to vote after they have served their time, but voting in jail!?!

    That little moment has stuck with me and annoyed me for a long time. I wish Bernie was a better communicator (KNOW your audience for goodness sakes) and kept his eyes on the prize sometimes.

    Last time around I was all for Bernie, but my enthusiasm has dimmed this time. Maybe he’s too old. Maybe all the MSM propaganda has really impacted me. Maybe Trump has made me cynical about American’s ability to vote smart.

    in reply to: Trump impeached — does it matter ? #110351
    Cal
    Participant

    What a joke. Thank goodness Pelosi and co. made sure to wrap up their investigation of the Ukraine mess so quickly.

    Democrats certainly wouldn’t want to keep talking about possible crimes and Trump’s stupid conspiracies about Ukraine.

    If Trump does get re-elected in 2020 the feckless Democratic leadership, like their willingness to continue to give Trump a blank check to run-up deficits, will be an important piece of the puzzle to explain how this lying PoS remains president.

    in reply to: Is McVay going to adequately replace both Wade & Bones? #110260
    Cal
    Participant

    I would have liked to see Wade come back, but he IS old at this point. Someone new was needed at some point. That said, the defense played well this year even though they had little depth and some tough injuries.

    Bones?? Ennh. I don’t remember any good special teams returns or blocked punts from the last 2 years since Pharaoh Cooper tried to fumble away McVay’s first playoff game. Did the special teams make any plays last year (besides Greg’s big kicks) or this year in the return game or blocked punts?

    in reply to: tweets & such … 1/5 thru 1/7 #110122
    Cal
    Participant

    I believe the Rams have an option on Robey-Coleman’s contract and could save 4.5 million by cutting him. I’d like to see the Rams decline the option.

    Releasing Weddle and Havenstein and declining Coleman’s option would leave the Rams with 35 million in cap space. They could probably keep Littleton and Fowler with that amount of cap space.

    Wade loves a strong secondary but pass rushers are also necessary in Wade’s defense. I can’t imagine that Fowler will NOT be a Ram next year.

    Cal
    Participant

    I’ve had an idea in the back of my head for a while now about people coming together to actually address climate change.

    It’s probably a fool’s errand, but I created a web site. Check it out and tell me what you think!

    https://www.risetotheccc.com/

    in reply to: What do you expect from these Wild Card playoff games? #110111
    Cal
    Participant

    Romo’s inaccurate analysis (See Orlovsky’s breakdown later in this thread) highlights how surprisingly vanilla the Pats played on that really important 3rd & 8.

    Romo predicted that Belichick would double team one guy, but BOTH safeties were 20 yards off the LOS at the snap. They played a simple 2 deep safety look to prevent a big gain when the Titans only needed 8 yards!

    My brother who loves Belichick told me this week that Belichick was ready to move on from Brady and wasn’t playing to win after the Pats surprising home loss to the Dolphins last week.

    That 3rd & 8 defense allowed for an easy pitch and catch for 10 yards.

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by Cal.
    in reply to: Higbee #109984
    Cal
    Participant

    Maybe, but McVay seems to place an emphasis on speed. The Rams spent a lot to get Cooks and they wasted no time at all locking up Gurley who used to be special because of his size and speed. When Gurley’s knee became an issue, they used their second pick last year on Henderson, a small but fast rb.

    If Cooks is healthy, I don’t think McVay takes him off the field. We’ll see.

    I’m very curious to see what the Rams do with this off season.

    Do they bring back Whit or trust Noteboom at LT?
    Fowler or Littleton or neither?
    How do they continue to improve the OL?
    How do they improve the depth at DL?

    in reply to: Higbee #109977
    Cal
    Participant

    Which Wr do you take off the field if you go with 2 tight ends?

    I don’t think McVay had the weapons at WR like the Rams have when Vernon Davis and Jordan Reed combined for 110 catches in McVay’s last year in DC.

    After this year, Cooks would seem to be the easy choice, but when he was healthy last year he had a helluva year. Hopefully, with a better line next year, Cooks can run some of those deeper routes and return to his 2018 production.

    in reply to: Higbee #109951
    Cal
    Participant

    Cooks’s speed makes him an important part of this offense. He just adds a dimension that Reynolds, Woods, and Kupp don’t offer.

    Having a healthy Cooks next year will make a difference to the offense next year.

    With Higbee’s emergence this year does anyone think the Rams could trade Everett? I believe next year is his last year under contract and it’s hard to imagine the Rams resigning him with Higbee’s contract.

    The Rams surely could use another 3rd or 4th round pick to help build some depth.

    in reply to: next…Dallas. Thotz? #109171
    Cal
    Participant

    Wow! that video of Gurley against the Cowboys a couple years ago is jarring.

    He has lost more than a step. The 2017 Gurley would have torched the Seahawks last night. What a shame.

    The Rams margin of error on offense has shrunk so much. Like WV, I also don’t trust this OL. Edwards looks quite shaky at guard & Blythe and Corbett aren’t good players.

    The Rams can win, but they better be ready for a tough game.

    I’m looking forward to some good December football!

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by Cal.
    in reply to: uneducated white voters & voting for Trump #108795
    Cal
    Participant

    The problem with tax cuts is, as mentioned, they have to be paid back. The federal government has to borrow money to make up for the revenue losses while it maintains the same levels of goods and services — or increases them. And because it’s deficit spending, an interest payment is tacked on too. It’s also pure economic illiteracy on Trump’s part to cut taxes while the economy is doing okay. Keynes was right. Stimulate the economy in down times; pay off the debt in relatively good times.

    The deficit problem created by the tax cut is part of the republican evil genius. You know who is voting against this enormous federal deficit? Republican representatives and senators all around the country.

    The gov’t couldn’t continue to function and increase the deficit without Nancy Pelosi and the democrats continuing to choose to run the gov’t this way.

    Republican representatives and senators get to have it both ways: the economy is great AND we are working to oppose those dumb democrats who are always spending money they don’t have.

    Trump, of course, should have a more difficult argument to make. But the democrats seem like they don’t want to hammer the stupid economic predicament Trump has created. Or maybe they do and I missed it.

    At the start I was excited about the possibility of a strong rebuke of Trump from the Democrats during the debates, but I’ve pretty much tuned out the Democratic primary nonsense at this stage.

    in reply to: uneducated white voters & voting for Trump #108785
    Cal
    Participant

    Ha! Pakman is talking about uneducated voters supporting Trump and Pakman doesn’t even have an educated opinion about Trump’s tax cut.

    Trump and the republicans did a good job of targeting white working class voters without a college education with their tax cut. Part of the tax cut included doubling the child tax credit which reduces the taxes for anyone with kids.

    I would guess most of those voters have children they can claim and saw a big reduction in their tax bill after the tax cuts.

    Pakman’s explanation doesn’t even come close to explaining the savings that millions of tax payers realized with the tax cut.

    Pakman’s solution of using education by teaching critical thinking earlier in schools is so perfect as it represents the mainstream Democratic solutions.

    Instead of more education, how about giving these people more time off work, higher wages, and standing up to a system that tries to extract an extra dime from working class people at every opportunity.

    in reply to: reactions to the Steelers game #107983
    Cal
    Participant

    I wish McVay would have run the ball once after the Rams moved the ball quickly to the Pittsburgh 30 with 1:30 and 3 timeouts left.

    A 3rd and 5 or 4th & 5 is a lot easier to pick up than 4th and 10.

    It’s amazing they had a chance to win after playing so bad. Goff looks like he struggles when he has time off.

    Have you guys already suggested that he is a qb that needs practice and reps? I feel like that is something that has been thrown out there but I forget.

    in reply to: IMO Trump #107933
    Cal
    Participant

    Moreover, the entire purpose of a public education is to prepare all students-including those with a disability-to become a productive member of society. Finally, not all students with learning disabilities are behavioral problems. Those that are and affect classroom studies can under the law be more isolated. I am curious as to how you would solve issues you perceive above-go back to the days of isolating all disabled students into sequestered centers much like orphanages in the face of all the evidence that educating these students in a general education environment provides them with the tools to become “productive member of society”.

    Two points (if you still remember this conversation!)

    First, the idea that schools prepare all students to be productive members of society is one of my main points. The k-12 system is trying to do too much. It’s frustrating (and ultimately foolish) to try to prepare all students for jobs of the 21st century.

    This notion of preparing all students for 21st century problems is a big part of the problem and has partly led to Trumpism (more on this later). Communities all around the country only have Wal-Mart jobs for people who were never good at school.

    Thousands of communities around the community are struggling because their decent jobs that don’t require a college education were moved to Mexico, China, and countries where companies pay employers 2 bucks an hour.

    I just read about the feedback effect in climate change and I think a feedback effect is affecting k-12 education. Parents no longer have decent jobs, which leads to chaos in families and the struggles of poverty. And that, in turn, makes schools worse.

    Billy asserts that there is no connection between poor kids and classroom disruption. But I find that hard to believe: we know that black families have significantly less wealth than white families & there is a gap between what black kids achieve and what white kids achieve in the classroom. I am nearly positive that achievement gap is well documented and an area that nearly everyone wants to focus on.

    These two facts suggest that there is a clear connection between education and income. I would also assert that race doesn’t have much impact on the connection between low achievement in the classroom and low income. Poor white communities struggle in classroom just as poor Native American communities and poor black communities. Based on my anecdotal evidence (you are right I do work in a school) I’d also bet that there is a much higher rate of school fights and referrals for classroom disruption in communities that are poor.

    My second point is that dealing with schools that are struggling with all these problems is frustrating for parents and educators. Frustrated parents and educators become frustrated voters and maybe Trump voters.

    The system is broken and these voters are not ignorant. They have an intimate experience with a broken system everyday when they take their kids to school and talk about what happened in the classroom.

    The solution to this system for the left for the last 25 years? More funding. This funding has led to an exponential growth in funding for testing and administration. The amount of money spent on administrative costs for schools has grown 240% in the last 25 years. All too often, the bureaucracy of education grows and teachers in the classroom don’t get very much help.

    This is exactly the complaint of conservative voters. I hate Trump and actually voted for Stein in 2016 because I knew Trump had no chance of winning my state. I detest Trump but I think it is valuable to understand why people continue to support him.

    These voters have gone to war with a system that they experience daily and is ridiculous. Take a listen to a recent podcast by Hidden Brain about “BS JObs” ​and the problems that we’ve created today with education.

    There are other choices besides 1) sequestering kids with issues in horrible facilities OR 2) pouring money into a system to test, offer remediation, and test again. And then find still other options for kids who are still struggling so that students can be prepared to be nurses, engineers, or programmers (even though there are still tons of other jobs that need to be done).

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by Cal.
Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 202 total)