Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Rams 1st round pick, #13…Ty Simpson
- This topic has 199 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by
zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 25, 2026 at 7:48 pm #163562
wvParticipantSchefter says they didnt receive a single call to trade down, so they were stuck at 13.
April 25, 2026 at 7:52 pm #163564
wvParticipantKlatt on Ty
April 25, 2026 at 8:09 pm #163568
znModeratorSchefter says they didnt receive a single call to trade down, so they were stuck at 13
This conflicts with reports claiming they did have offers.
So who knows.
To be fair, Schefter is good. But maybe the different reports come from different sources?
We shall see if time will tell.
April 25, 2026 at 8:16 pm #163569
HerzogParticipantI just saw Grudena QB class show with Ty. I think I really like this kid.
April 25, 2026 at 9:31 pm #163574
ZooeyModeratorI think McVay was kind of a dick to Ty on the phone. He gave me”I’m gonna run you out of town” vibes. One of the few times I was really disappointed in him. Like him or not, he’s got him now…. Coach him the Fuq up now
that’s what i thought initially. but i am not so sure.
maybe aloof? i think he’s trying to tread a line between bringing in a new qb and making sure the old qb knows that he’s still the guy.
i don’t even know if that came from stafford or maybe mcvay just had it in his head. or he didn’t want the media to manufacture some kind of drama?
the media did end up creating drama anyway which they tried to clear up. i don’t think snead or the organization would want to upset mcvay by forcing a pick on him unless they know something we don’t. which is that mcvay and stafford do not plan on coming back. but i don’t see any reason to think that.
I simply don’t know, but I am somewhat concerned that McVay and Stafford are secretly “married,” and that McVay is going to leave when Stafford retires. He’s got little kids, and the amount of money some network offered him a while back was unbelievable. It could be that McVay has been open about all that with Snead, and this is Snead preparing for that post-Stafford/McVay world, and McVay had no choice but to accept it. I’m totally making that up, though. I just find the “McVay was acting for Stafford’s benefit” storyline more farfetched than the one I just presented. I don’t know, but something felt off.
April 25, 2026 at 9:51 pm #163575
znModeratorI simply don’t know, but I am somewhat concerned that McVay and Stafford are secretly “married,” and that McVay is going to leave when Stafford retires.
Why is this draft producing more than its share of conspiracy theories?
Their explanation was simple and makes sense. They have Stafford for a couple of years, but not forever. They like Simpson (and it is clear that Simpson has traits that fit this offense).They don’t see themselves getting a high 1st round pick again for a while.
No matter what the reason, no GM who built a reputation for working collaboratively is going to take a qb his head coach does not like. That’s whether or not the head coach was dumb enough to actually say “I plan on retiring when the qb does.” Garappolo is retiring, they don’t have a #2 anyway. They can see Simpson developing. Their coaching roster includes an unusually rich list of good offensive minds, and if they didn’t like Simpson, they would have spoken up.
McVay is in coaching because he loves coaching, that much is obvious, and he went through his early mid-life crisis in 2022 and came out of it.
There’s nothing under the rug. Or between the lines. There is no backstage drama. Their story adds up and makes sense and fits all the data points we know.
…
April 25, 2026 at 10:51 pm #163585
znModeratorVincent Bonsignore@VinnyBonsignore
Here is the price they paid to get Jared Goff and Matthew Stafford:Four 1st round picks, two 2nd-round picks, two 3rd-round picks AND Goff (And a ton of salary)
(Obviously well worth it)
What it cost them to get Simpson: Handing a slip of paper to the commissioner. And maybe, if he doesn’t pan out, some regret on losing out on a player that could have helped them.
If Simpson works out, that’s incredible value.
And that doesn’t even take into account what they might have to pay to find Stafford’s replacement, if they didn’t draft Simpson.
Even if he doesn’t work out, the cost is minimal. They still have all future assets to address QB.
Once the Rams decided Simpson could be a dude, they pretty much had to take him. There’s no guarantee they’ll be in a position anytime soon to get their QB at cost of handing the commissioner a slip of paper.
April 25, 2026 at 11:21 pm #163588
ZooeyModeratorWhy is this draft producing more than its share of conspiracy theories?
I think it’s because of McVay’s demeanor which seems “troubled.” And I think I read in The Athletic this morning that his concern that Stafford might misinterpret it if he showed enthusiasm is the official “next day” statement. To me, that DOESN’T add up because an honest phone call prior to the draft telling Stafford that’s what they would probably do, and reassuring him privately that Stafford owns the timeline is the sensible thing to do. You don’t NOT tell Stafford, and put on a little act, and then talk to him AFTER the draft, and throw Snead under the bus. No competent leader would play that angle. So I don’t buy the “acting” interpretation at all.
So… it hinges on whether you think McVay appeared comfortable or not. I haven’t watched the whole press conference, and maybe I would change my mind if I did, but the phone call and the first couple of questions did not resemble the film we saw of him calling Verse and Fiske, and that press conference.
April 25, 2026 at 11:22 pm #163589
znModeratorThis is Rodrigue for 30 minutes.
And as we know cause we know Rodrigue, this is about as good as it gets.
The great @JourdanRodrigue joined us to discuss whether it's crazy to think Sean McVay didn't want Ty Simpson, among other draft topics!
Jordan Rodrigue Reacts To The Rams Draft https://t.co/uj8KNAQKC3
— Sam Monson (@SamMonsonNFL) April 26, 2026
April 25, 2026 at 11:50 pm #163590
InvaderRamModeratorwho knows? i do from time to time worry that a broadcasting gig will be too hard to turn down. he’ll have more family time. make more money. less stress. it makes sense.
to me. to you. to most people.
the only counterpoint i have to that is mcvay is wired different. i don’t think he can do that and be happy. he needs that adrenaline rush from being a head coach.
but maybe he goes the way of vermeil and needs some kind of sabbatical. vermeil had to leave the eagles when he was 46 years old. mcvay is 40. will be 41 when the season is over.
as far as his demeanor. i can’t say with certainty. but i just had this feeling. even before the press conference. that. not that it was acting. but it’s one thing to communicate with matt beforehand (which i’m sure they did). and another to actually pull the trigger on picking simpson in the first round. and you know all the ramifications that come with it. not just stafford. but the media. the fans. all the criticism that will come with that decision. all the speculation. if nacua or adams become unavailable for whatever reason. for an extended period of time. if the oline breaks down with injuries. they’ll be questioning that pick. and maybe mcvay was anticipating that and was already on guard. cagey if you will. did not want to give the media any fodder, but incidentally did anyway.
we might not know the real story for another ten years if ever. but right now i don’t see mcvay wanting to leave. and given that mcvay is committed to staying, i can’t see how snead would force a player on his head coach if he clearly disliked him that much. and listening to simpson, i don’t see how mcvay would not like him.
i guess it all hinges on whether or not you think mcvay is close to leaving. i don’t know. he was pretty close to doing that five years ago. catch me on another day and i may have a different opinion.
April 26, 2026 at 12:07 am #163591
znModeratori guess it all hinges on whether or not you think mcvay is close to leaving. i don’t know. he was pretty close to doing that five years ago. catch me on another day and i may have a different opinion.
Rodrigue addresses all of that in the vid I posted (it’s embedded in a tweet, just above).
Rodrigue’s view is that he went through his crisis in 2022 and came out of it, and that was that, he’s a coach.
April 26, 2026 at 12:22 am #163592
InvaderRamModeratorhow does one read between the lines in this interview? hahahaha!
they say there was no pushback when discussing simpson. i can’t believe that’s true. not exactly.
they do mention that it wasn’t in important where they took him. just that they got their player. i think we’ve known for awhile that this organization values draft picks differently than most other organizations do.
and lastly shout out to all nerds. good to see our people at the podium taking questions.
April 26, 2026 at 12:24 am #163593
InvaderRamModeratorRodrigue’s view is that he went through his crisis in 2022 and came out of it, and that was that, he’s a coach.
yeah. but that was then. this is now. things change. for the record i agree with you, but we could be wrong.
April 26, 2026 at 12:39 am #163594
znModeratoryeah. but that was then. this is now. things change. for the record i agree with you, but we could be wrong.
We could be wrong. There’s less chance of Rodrigue being wrong. Let’s just say that the “short future McVay” story is unlikely. And Rodrigue was not talking about “then,” she actually was talking about now. Her point is that the positive after effects of 2022 are still very much intact. That is what she sees. And this is a reporter who studied their draft process first hand, and who wrote the single most in depth and revealing story about the McVay crisis of 2022.
So why is there speculation about this pick, McVay’s reaction, and McVay’s future? IMO–people are just making things out of the press conference that are just not there. That’s the incitement.
Yet I fall back on knowing that there has never been a Rams story, ever, where we did not hear fairly quickly what was going on behind the scenes. We knew Gurley’s knee was bad in 2018, and we knew in spite of them denying it in public. We knew in spite of what they were saying that McVay and Goff weren’t “connecting” by the end of 2020. We knew it wasn’t just Goff being “bad.” How did we know? Not just because of what we saw. Because it is a big organization in a big town full of media ears of all kinds, and it leaks right and left.
…
…April 26, 2026 at 12:55 am #163595
ZooeyModeratorYet I fall back on knowing that there has never been a Rams story, ever, where we did not hear fairly quickly what was going on behind the scenes.
I never saw anything explaining Ernest Jones. That may be one exception.
April 26, 2026 at 1:30 am #163596
znModeratorYet I fall back on knowing that there has never been a Rams story, ever, where we did not hear fairly quickly what was going on behind the scenes.
I never saw anything explaining Ernest Jones. That may be one exception.
You might be right about that. But then that one was no mystery. He spoke up in public about how he deserved an extension, and doing that (griping publicly) goes against Rams code.
April 26, 2026 at 1:35 am #163598
InvaderRamModeratorSo why is there speculation about this pick, McVay’s reaction, and McVay’s future? IMO–people are just making things out of the press conference that are just not there. That’s the incitement.
ok so i went and watched the video. and it was good. pretty much stuff i have been speculating about minus the all the detail and insider information that she brought to the table. mcvay is a lightning rod. has been since the rams hired him. martz caught a little bit of that, but mcvay has for better or worse been able to sustain that for a decade. it just comes with the territory.
an aside note. this. and i keep harping on it. this is one of the markers that will define sean’s legacy. his ability to draft and develop a qb. as jourdan said, mcvay won’t actually be in there getting his hands dirty with simpson, but he will be overseeing the process. he is directly involved in hiring the people who are responsible for tuning simpson up. and i agree with jourdan. he needs a stable environment to accomplish this. because mcvay is such a lightning rod, the environment is always in flux. especially with the offensive coaching staff. how he does this i have no clue. goff had lafleur and he left almost immediately. so now what happens with simpson. jourdan has her doubts. i wonder too. i think what will be crucial is how much mcvay has learned in the years since he traded goff and then almost burned out himself. can he slow down his pace and let others catch up? simpson will also have the benefit of learning under stafford instead of being put in the pressurized environment of a qb1 like goff was. of course if stafford retires in a year, then everything changes. it would actually be a benefit to everyone if stafford stayed two or three more years. but mcvay will also have to realize that he can’t just expect simpson to hit the ground running. i’ll be curious to see how it all unfolds.
i will say this. i slightly disagree with her in that some of it might be personality issues. goff may not have been the best match personality wise? i don’t have anything to base that on. just a hunch. simpson might actually be a better fit. just watching him in that chase daniels interview. again. i can’t quite articulate it, but i can see mcvay vibing with this guy. doesn’t mean it’ll be a success. but it may have a better chance of success than the mcvay goff partnership?
i am glad they also talked about the 13 personnel transition the rams are doing. i think ferguson and klare will be important. so important as wr/te hybrids. it’s why i wasn’t so concerned about drafting another receiver. i see next year as parkinson being the inline te with higbee as the backup or vice versa. and then ideally ferguson as the move te/third wr if he can progress. so they’ll essentially be an 11/12 personnel hybrid. then you can mix in klare or higbee/parkinson depending on the situation in 13 personnel. in the future you could even have ferguson and klare lined up together with two wrs if everything goes well. i’m sure the coaching staff are coming up with all sorts of different ideas.
-
This reply was modified 3 weeks, 2 days ago by
InvaderRam.
April 26, 2026 at 1:39 am #163600
znModeratoran aside note. this. and i keep harping on it. this is one of the markers that will define sean’s legacy. his ability to draft and develop a qb. as jourdan said, mcvay won’t actually be in there getting his hands dirty with simpson, but he will be overseeing the process. he is directly involved in hiring the people who are responsible for tuning simpson up. and i agree with jourdan. he needs a stable environment to accomplish this.
Well said and I agree.
goff may not have been the best match personality wise? i don’t have anything to base that on. just a hunch.
I agree with that though I’d put it this way–the 2 of them were incompatible. It went both ways.
It’s revealing to read about how Ben Johnson worked with Goff. He began by finding out what Goff liked and what he thought he was good at. Johnson built it from there.
Does/will McV connect better with Simpson? Well TS is much more cerebral about the game than Goff was. In 2017 they hired Orlosky as the #2 to Goff, but his real job was to teach Goff how to read defenses. Orlovsky has said that when they began, Goff had no idea. None. He played in a college spread at UC that did not really depend on a qb knowing defensive fronts and coverages. It was the same reason Mahomes sat for a year. Simpson is light years ahead of that.
.
April 26, 2026 at 5:02 am #163606
znModeratorTy Simpson highlights vs. Georgia pic.twitter.com/7ktifAFnYv
— RAM BLITZR. 💙💛 (@inurhead69) April 26, 2026
April 26, 2026 at 9:16 am #163608
ZooeyModeratorThis is Rodrigue for 30 minutes.
And as we know cause we know Rodrigue, this is about as good as it gets.
That’s about as good as it gets.
Okay. She buried my concern.
I do think McVay was upset about something, though. And that’s the first thing he offered as an explanation, that there was something unrelated to the pick that agitated him. The concern about Stafford came out later, and doesn’t add up to me. But there’s a plethora of possibilities. Maybe they were *THIS* close to trading back a couple of slots and getting some bonus as well as getting their guy, and it fell through. Or maybe his wife is mad because he left the milk out on the counter again, and it spoiled, and now the kids have no milk. In fact, that’s what I think I’m going with.
April 26, 2026 at 9:25 am #163609
ZooeyModeratorThe height bothers me more than the number of starts, actually.
Brock Purdy is also 6’1″.
Brock Purdy isn’t Matthew Stafford, but he’s good enough. And if the Rams got Brock Purdy for close to Free, then that’s a W.
The question is: can McVay develop a QB? I would think he will be more patient because he doesn’t want to make the same mistake he already made with Goff, so maybe.
April 26, 2026 at 9:36 am #163610
znModeratorOr maybe his wife is mad because he left the milk out on the counter again, and it spoiled, and now the kids have no milk. In fact, that’s what I think I’m going with.
Or his wife got mad because she found out that day that the Rams intended to draft a quarterback at 13. I can just hear the squabble. “The man I married would have taken a receiver.”
April 26, 2026 at 10:33 am #163612
wvParticipantThat’s about as good as it gets.
Okay. She buried my concern.
I do think McVay was upset about something, though. And that’s the first thing he offered as an explanation, that there was something unrelated to the pick that agitated him. The concern about Stafford came out later, and doesn’t add up to me. But there’s a plethora of possibilities. Maybe they were *THIS* close to trading back a couple of slots and getting some bonus as well as getting their guy, and it fell through. Or maybe his wife is mad because he left the milk out on the counter again, and it spoiled, and now the kids have no milk. In fact, that’s what I think I’m going with.
Yeah, when Jordan is in topform she is as good as it gets. She’s always emphasizing her interest in ‘processes.’
Btw, is it…’normal procedure’ to tell your Hall of Fame QB that you are drafting another QB on the DAY of the Draft? I woulda thot they would talk to Stafford about it a month ago.
I dunno what was bothering McVay after the first round pick was made. I just assumed ‘something’ went wrong in the draft. In the past the draft has always seem to fall just right for McSnead. Not this time.
w
vApril 26, 2026 at 10:40 am #163615
ZooeyModeratorBtw, is it…’normal procedure’ to tell your Hall of Fame QB that you are drafting another QB on the DAY of the Draft? I woulda thot they would talk to Stafford about it a month ago.
This question has been dancing around in my mind, too. I don’t think we shall ever see.
April 26, 2026 at 10:42 am #163617
wvParticipantBrock Purdy is also 6’1″.
Brock Purdy isn’t Matthew Stafford, but he’s good enough. And if the Rams got Brock Purdy for close to Free, then that’s a W.
The question is: can McVay develop a QB? I would think he will be more patient because he doesn’t want to make the same mistake he already made with Goff, so maybe.
Yeah, and R.Wilson was smallish. There’s been some good ones. But i think the height thing has also limited Wilson and Purdy. I always thought the Rams took advantage of Wilson’s smallishness.
Wilson and Purdy could both RUN pretty effectively too. I dont think that is a big part of Ty’s game, really.
Probably the only modern smallish QB that really was an outlier was Drew Brees. He was a pocket guy and he had the Hall of Fame career. But, man, its just not what ya want. A smallish QB.
As Dominique Foxworthy (who i have a ton of respect for) said: the pick was a big risk. He didnt argue against the pick. Didnt say it was a ‘bad’ pick. Just that it was a big risk. They coulda had a sure thing, like Lemon, and they rolled the dice that next year’s team would be good enough…
Course you can argue ‘anything’ — you can argue it would be a big risk NOT to take a future-QB when you have the chance, blah blah.
If they lose the Super Bowl because Davante has a bad hamstring, I will, of course, be a gigantic pain in the ass.
…I’m still hoping an OBJ type deal is coming down the road.
w
vApril 26, 2026 at 10:47 am #163619
wvParticipantOr his wife got mad because she found out that day that the Rams intended to draft a quarterback at 13. I can just hear the squabble. “The man I married would have taken a receiver.”
All i know is we now need an ‘angry shark’ emoji around here.
w
vApril 26, 2026 at 10:55 am #163623
znModeratorProbably the only modern smallish QB that really was an outlier was Drew Brees.
When I first started reading your post, I immediately thought of Brees. But then you mentioned him.
Fwiw Joe Montana was 6’2, 200. Purdy is 6’1.
It’s a different era of course but great 6’0 and 6’1 qbs from the past include Bart Starr, Unitas, Fran Tarkenton, Sonny Jurgensen, Len Dawson, Joe Theismann, and Billy Kilmer.
So oh ye, be it known-eth, it has-eth been done-eth.
April 26, 2026 at 11:09 am #163625
wvParticipantWhen I first started reading your post, I immediately thought of Brees. But then you mentioned him.
Fwiw Joe Montana was 6’2, 200.
It’s a different era of course but great 6’0 and 6’1 qbs include Bart Starr, Unitas, Fran Tarkenton, Sonny Jurgensen, Len Dawson, Joe Theismann, and Billy Kilmer.
So oh ye, be it known-eth, it has-eth been done-eth.
Yeah, i thought of those golden-agers. Fran had a good career, of course, too. I just dont think we can compare the 70’s guys to todays players. I tend to think of todays era as starting in the 90s, maybe? I dunno.
Back in the old days Roman Gabriel was one of the few tall QBs. He was 6’4 and 220 or so, as i recall. I remember having a magazine back in 1970 or so, with an article about Roman. (i kept it for, like 30 years). The article was about how Roman Gabriel represented the coming age of ‘giant’ quarterbacks. The new prototype.
I also separate out the ‘mobile’ QBs from the pocket guys. I think of Ty as a Pocket QB. A smallish pocket QB in the modern era. So ya got Brees, and….not much else that i can remember from the 90’s on.
w
vApril 26, 2026 at 11:27 am #163626
znModeratorI think of Ty as a Pocket QB.
He’s more of a runner than Stafford is. He ain’t Michael Vick, but he is mobile. He can extend plays and they sometimes used him on designed runs. He’s seen as an effective scrambler and is good on boot action. So in terms of maneuverability and running, he gives them a lot more than Stafford does.
In fact he may have the best legs of any decent starting qb they’ve had since I first started watching them. Not a Vick, but good enough.
Like the first play on this vid. And then the plays at 1:04, 1:43, 2:24, 2:55, & 5:35.
April 26, 2026 at 11:50 am #163627
InvaderRamModeratorpartly kidding partly not.
maybe mcvay was hoping that someone else would pull the trigger on simpson. maybe a team would leap ahead of them and take the decision out of their hands. or when the trade down didn’t happen it kind of forced their hand to pick ty.
i think part of their process is to take the emotion out of it. and when the opportunity came to draft him, they had to take him. because that’s what the algorithm demanded. and despite trying to adhere to your principles, you’re still human and want that instant gratification.
i don’t know. i think mcvay wanted one of sadiq, stowers, or klare. he looked noticeably happy when the rams got klare at the bottom of the second. i know they had a visit with stowers. i don’t know their level of interest in sadiq, but at least to me, he seems like the perfect dynamic player to put in this offense. he was probably sweating balls thinking he might miss out on his tight end.
i really like the drew brees comparison. shorter. not a runner but mobile. tough. smart.
if he isn’t the next brees, i deem this draft a complete failure….
ok. i gotta find something to do.
-
This reply was modified 3 weeks, 2 days ago by
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

