political tweets

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House political tweets

Viewing 30 posts - 331 through 360 (of 509 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #131404
    zn
    Moderator

    I’m so far to the Doomer-Left these days, I
    am having a hard time seeing how Biden is better than Trump.

    I don’t like Biden one bit but he is clearly better than Trump. Your only argument is that he does not have progressive/leftist policies. Yeah well we knew that going in. But even this kind of died-in-the-wool deep committed Dem centrist is better than Trump. That doesn’t mean “good enough” but Trump is a very low bar and it’s easy to clear that bar. For example, he’s not encouraging and participating in racist discourse and he’s not encouraging and participating in dangerously untruthful discourse about covid and vaccination.

    It’s a long list.

    You add it all up and it’s nowhere near enough. We know that.

    But STILL, even given that, to me, you honestly seem to be forgetting how exactly fucking bad Trump was.

    ==========

    Well, nothing you said there was convincing, zn. Trump used racist language.
    Biden doesnt. Ok. Biden is still mass-murdering people of color all over the globe and building up a militarized-police force and building up the CIA,
    etc, etc.

    Its not that I have forgotten how bad Trump was.

    Biden just seems like a different ‘kind’ of racist to me.

    w
    v

    I didn’t really try to convince of anything (that would take more effort and a detailed post), for the sake of conversation I just painted the difference between us. It’s many many simple things. Does Biden promote internal domestic racist policies the same as Trump? Yes or no?

    Then extend that. Are American foreign wars actually based on race, or dominantion of economic resources? We also protect regimes of nations populated by people of color and headed by people of color because they are valuable allies in the global domination of resources. I don’t think we’re really analyzing race when distinctions just don’t count anymore. To me it becomes empty buzzwords.

    I said before the election that Trump was even worse than people imagined and not only was I right, he was even worse than I even imagined he would be when I said that.

    I agreed more with what you were saying a few weeks back when you once complained that in left twitter, if you point out the way Trump was actually worse, you get called a “liberal” and dismissed. Yeah that’s true (ie it’s true one encounters that reaction) and IMO when that happens it’s not the least bit true or useful.

    #131413
    wv
    Participant

    I didn’t really try to convince of anything (that would take more effort and a detailed post), for the sake of conversation I just painted the difference between us. It’s many many simple things. Does Biden promote internal domestic racist policies the same as Trump? Yes or no?

    Then extend that. Are American foreign wars actually based on race, or dominantion of economic resources? We also protect regimes of nations populated by people of color and headed by people of color because they are valuable allies in the global domination of resources. I don’t think we’re really analyzing race when distinctions just don’t count anymore. To me it becomes empty buzzwords.

    I said before the election that Trump was even worse than people imagined and not only was I right, he was even worse than I even imagined he would be when I said that.

    I agreed more with what you were saying a few weeks back when you once complained that in left twitter, if you point out the way Trump was actually worse, you get called a “liberal” and dismissed. Yeah that’s true (ie it’s true one encounters that reaction) and IMO when that happens it’s not the least bit true or useful.

    ==============

    Well, my main complaint about twitter (which i like, a lot) is that
    there is no room in those little boxes for nuance, complexity, conversation, etc.

    Its true, I complain that if i argue Trump was worse, I’d get smeared as
    a Lib by a lot of folks on Left-Twitter. But the truth is, i just want
    to ‘explore’ the notion. Was he really ‘worse’? What does ‘worse’ mean?
    Is Biden worse in some ways? Is it complicated?

    I used to think Trump was worse. On Mondays and Thursdays, I still think that.
    But the other days…I cant make the argument. In my own mind, the argument seems hollow.

    For two reasons:
    1) Biden is worse than i thought he’d be. (and i thought he’d be awful)
    2) The biosphere is dying. That context changes everything. Small policy differences between Biden and Trump pale in comparison to that.
    It looks to me, that Biden And Trump are ‘essentially’ the same on the
    Biosphere-Killing Policies.

    This is what it seems like to me: The Biosphere is in the back of a pickup
    truck. Headed for a cliff. When trump is at the wheel, he is flooring it
    saying ‘Faster!’. When Biden is at the wheel he’s is doing nothing
    to slow the speed, or change the direction.

    So both are going to destroy everything. I cant make a strong argument
    that Biden is ‘better’ when on the CRITICAL issue, he is a world-killer.

    So, i do go back and forth on this, grasping for better
    answers, better metaphors, explorations.

    But mostly, i can no longer make a persuasive argument (to myself)
    that Trump is worse.

    w
    v

    #131414
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Interesting dialogue between youze guys, regarding Biden vs. Trump.

    IMO, Trump is significantly worse than any president since Andrew Jackson, and the most vile human being ever to sit in the White House. Biden is “meh.” He’s the centrist we basically expected, so he obviously falls way short of leftist dreams and hopes. But Trump was a fascist’s dream come true, and the worst president on the environment, perhaps ever. He seems to take pleasure in all of his destruction, and isn’t finished with his coup attempt(s) yet.

    Let them drink bleach! he basically said. So he has the deaths of hundreds of thousands on his hands — above and beyond his escalation of wars/bombings in Yemen and elsewhere. To me, there’s never been such stark differences between past and present administrations, as far as damage to the earth, to society, to the future.

    WV, could you elaborate on your comments regarding Biden’s “rebuilding” of the CIA and the police? I wasn’t aware that it was happening, and I didn’t see any indications that Trump reduced their powers one iota, or their budgets. In fact, compared with Obama’s budgeting, Trump increased them a great deal more. If I read the graph below correctly, the intel budget increased more than 12 billion under Trump, and fell a coupla billion under Obama.

    https://fas.org/irp/budget/

    Overall military spending also fell under Obama, and rose significantly under Trump.

    (I’d add another link for that, but it likely won’t make it past the spam check.)

    #131416
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Here’s a link for military budgeting, 2003 – 2021:

    https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-military-budget-components-challenges-growth-3306320

    #131417
    zn
    Moderator

    (I’d add another link for that, but it likely won’t make it past the spam check.)

    Don’t let that hinder things. Always just post. It’s all easily fixed. I see that the link is posted…but for the future, if you’re worried about the spam monster and don’t like any delays then just message me via the “chat” message app down to the right and put the link there and I will post it.

    I am here to protest and serve.

    😎

    #131418
    Billy_T
    Participant

    And another — again, separating them because of the filter.

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/217577/outlays-for-defense-and-forecast-in-the-us/

    #131419
    Billy_T
    Participant

    (I’d add another link for that, but it likely won’t make it past the spam check.)

    Don’t let that hinder things. Just post. It’s all easily fixed. If you don’t like any delays then just deposit a link in the “chat” message app down to the right, and I will post it.

    Thanks, ZN,

    I hope you and WV continue your dialogue, and if you have the time, get more specific?

    Hope all is well . . .

    #131422
    zn
    Moderator

    I hope you and WV continue your dialogue, and if you have the time, get more specific?

    There’s very little chance of that. Time. I have to be satisfied with “position statements.”

    #131437
    wv
    Participant

    Interesting dialogue between youze guys, regarding Biden vs. Trump.

    IMO, Trump is significantly worse than any president since Andrew Jackson, and the most vile human being ever to sit in the White House. Biden is “meh.” He’s the centrist we basically expected, so he obviously falls way short of leftist dreams and hopes. But Trump was a fascist’s dream come true, and the worst president on the environment, perhaps ever. He seems to take pleasure in all of his destruction, and isn’t finished with his coup attempt(s) yet.

    Let them drink bleach! he basically said. So he has the deaths of hundreds of thousands on his hands — above and beyond his escalation of wars/bombings in Yemen and elsewhere. To me, there’s never been such stark differences between past and present administrations, as far as damage to the earth, to society, to the future.

    WV, could you elaborate on your comments regarding Biden’s “rebuilding” of the CIA and the police? I wasn’t aware that it was happening, and I didn’t see any indications that Trump reduced their powers one iota, or their budgets. In fact, compared with Obama’s budgeting, Trump increased them a great deal more. If I read the graph below correctly, the intel budget increased more than 12 billion under Trump, and fell a coupla billion under Obama.

    https://fas.org/irp/budget/

    Overall military spending also fell under Obama, and rose significantly under Trump.

    (I’d add another link for that, but it likely won’t make it past the spam check.)

    ====

    If both men, are promoting policies that are World-killers.
    Biosphere-enders. How can we say, one is really worse than
    the other? I dont get that argument, anymore.

    The words ‘centrist’ and ‘fascist’ and racist etc,
    just dont mean a lot IF — IF — you think they are both
    world-killers.

    Maybe the difference is, you and zn, just dont see
    Biden/trump as biosphere-killers.

    w
    v

    #131449
    Billy_T
    Participant

    ====

    If both men, are promoting policies that are World-killers.
    Biosphere-enders. How can we say, one is really worse than
    the other?
    I dont get that argument, anymore.

    The words ‘centrist’ and ‘fascist’ and racist etc,
    just dont mean a lot IF — IF — you think they are both
    world-killers.

    Maybe the difference is, you and zn, just dont see
    Biden/trump as biosphere-killers.

    w
    v

    WV,

    Trump opened up millions of formerly protected acres (most of which had been saved by Obama) to fossil fuel extraction. He took us out of the Paris Accords. He seeded his administration with billionaires with direct ties to the fossil fuel industry, and with countless ideologues who thought, as he does, that Climate Change is a Chinese hoax. He put coal lobbyists in charge of the Interior and the EPA. He pushed for a massive increase in fossil fuel extraction offshore. He destroyed countless regulations designed to protect the environment, and took the side of corporate polluters against the planet without exception.

    If that had been allowed to stand, literally millions of humans and countless other life-forms would have perished down the road.

    Biden has reversed most of the above policies, and at least promised to tackle 99% of the rest. Does he go far enough? Of course not. Not even close. Hell, the GND doesn’t go far enough, and we know Biden won’t go for that. But I think it’s a mistake to view Trump’s ultra-aggressive destruction of the environment as equivalent to Biden’s (far too) modest attempt to right the ship. The difference between the two positions means the difference between losing tens of millions of lives, or hundreds of thousands.

    It obviously should be zero. No lives lost. No one left behind. No more Sixth Extinction. We obviously need to make radical changes if we’re to prevent the Sixth Extinction from including us too. But to the individuals who will live or die based on the differences between the two agendas, it means the world. They definitely wouldn’t say “they’re just the same.”

    #131452
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Also: I think it’s a continuum, roughly speaking, from left to right, with “casualties” decreasing radically as we go from far left to the center; radically increasing as we go from the center to the far right.

    (Basically a V shape result of most lives saved to most lives lost)

    Not perfect as a continuum, of course. But, basically that. If we implement so-called far-left policies, backed with far-left philosophy and adequate rhetorical support, we save the most possible lives, and prevent the Sixth Extinction from including us. IMO, if we don’t replace capitalism, with its Grow or Die market imperatives, we Homo Sapiens end up victims, too, sooner or later. Moving rightward from a complete transition away from capitalism, keeping capitalism in place but tweaking it “progressively,” we lose fewer lives than if we implement centrist policies, but we eventually succumb to pollution and Climate Change regardless. If governments implement even further-right policies, we succumb much faster, suffer far more, and the misery index increases radically the further right of center we go.

    To me, it matters on the individual level, which way we go. The differences are existentially important, from far left to left, from left to liberal, from liberal to moderate, to centrist, and so on. Millions of lives hang in the balance from one point on the spectrum to the next. And that’s not hyperbole. I honestly think the difference in “casualties” will be in the millions as we move from left to right. If we go far-right, it’s in the billions.

    Just my take.

    #131459
    Zooey
    Participant

    Ya got lung cancer, and you see two doctors. One emphasizes that you have the right to smoke, and should be able to smoke in the hospital in spite of the snowflake policies against it. The other doctor tells you not to smoke, and gives you pain medication. Neither rolls you into the operating room to remove the tumor.

    One doctor is preferable to the other, even though the end result is you are going to die anyway. Of course, removing the tumor is the only sensible thing to do, but there is still a difference in your experience of your final days.

    Trump actively promoted misery. He emboldened racists, and hate crimes rose under his influence. He would be happy to see the country fall into a civil war. He incited a coup, and blessed the assassination of his own Vice President. He brought out the worst in people. Biden isn’t doing enough to put out any fires, but at least he isn’t fanning the flames.

    That’s the end of all my analogies and metaphors for the day.

    #131462
    wv
    Participant

    #131466
    Billy_T
    Participant

    I think there’s a danger in “they’re all the same” thinking, and it’s the proverbial two-edged sword to boot. We can make a case, for instance, when it comes to environmental destruction, that super-progressive action, short of replacing capitalism outright, is the same as centrist action, in the long run. Both routes will still render the planet uninhabitable for most life-forms in the not too distant future. It will put us on different time-tables, and the numbers of preventable early deaths will differ, but the end result is the same.

    As in, if there’s no discernible difference between a Biden and a Trump, eco-wise, then there’s no discernible difference between a Sanders and a Biden.

    Yeah, I know, blasphemy! But when you zoom out far enough, all the world’s a blur.

    (More in the next post)

    #131467
    Billy_T
    Participant

    I’ve been listening to the audio version of a great book on capitalism. In my opinion, it’s the single best book-length definition, evah: The Origin of Capitalism, by Ellen Meiksins Wood. First read it a few years ago, and listening to it now reminds me how precise, concise, wise, and compelling it is. This, in combo with William Clare Roberts’ Marx’s Inferno, just seals the deal for me:

    Capitalism is all about domination, on several levels, and to a surprising degree, that domination is impersonal, especially via “the market.” The market controls us. We don’t control it. And Marx/Marxist insights demonstrate how even capitalists are at its mercy, and why that’s a catastrophe.

    To boil down centuries into a coupla paragraphs, the key to our saving the planet is to make production truly personal again, local again, need-based again, and fully democratic for the first time in the modern world; for ourselves, our families, our communities, linked, egalitarian, cooperative. As long as it’s exchange-based, competitive, impersonal, detached, and the commodification of all life rules, we die as a species, and we take most life-forms with us.

    The baked-in imperatives of a market society require endless growth, and an ever increasing loop of more production, more consumption, more waste, and more pollution. Tweaking around the edges won’t save the planet. Even the GND, which goes beyond tweaking, won’t do it, because it still leaves intact the fundamental market imperatives of More, More, More, by leaving capitalism intact, which means impersonal domination remains.

    If we don’t replace capitalism soon, Homo Sapiens will not survive much into the 22nd century, and with half of all wildlife already gone just since 1970, 99% of what’s left will certainly follow us over the cliff.

    #131468
    Zooey
    Participant

    We needed Sanders decades ago. We’re past that now.

    We’re now looking at a grim future no matter what. Which grim future is better?

    I don’t know. But like flood waters coursing through a German town, there isn’t much hope of directing the current.

    So now I’m finished with similes for the day.

    #131471
    Billy_T
    Participant

    We needed Sanders decades ago. We’re past that now.

    We’re now looking at a grim future no matter what. Which grim future is better?

    I don’t know. But like flood waters coursing through a German town, there isn’t much hope of directing the current.

    So now I’m finished with similes for the day.

    I agree with all of that.

    Again, one could easily say that because neither the Dems nor the Republicans have solved the problem of human mortality yet, they’re just the same. No diff. We can zoom out so far, there really are no differences, so nihilism seems the best course.

    Then, again, we could fight for the most dignified, least painful, least miserable or cruel exit from the stage, and that can be our guide. To me, I actually do see major differences between the two parties (and the people who run them) along those line.

    If we really are truly fooked, and it looks like we are, I’d rather not have to listen to serial-lying, far-right bullies, beloved by white supremacists, gas on about how the “deep state” is out to get them, and how “they” won’t replace whitey, and how “the far left” is supposedly destroying America, and it’s all “antifa’s” fault, and critical race theory’s, and blah blah blah.

    If we’re on our way out, I want to go with non-fascist tunes playing in the wind.

    #131472
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Just noticed that I screwed up my own argument above, and likely confused any reader who trudged through the tundra of my posts.

    My V shape analogy is out of whack. And it’s probably not the only error in my posts.

    :>)

    Sorry.

    Hopefully, you guys know what I meant to say, given the rest of the post(s).

    As in, in essence: peak lives saved via “far-left” policies, etc. etc. Peak lives lost via far-right policies. Furthest left side of the V as best possible outcome. Furthest right side as worst.

    I need a vacation!

    #131474
    wv
    Participant

    I think there’s a danger in “they’re all the same” thinking, and it’s the proverbial two-edged sword to boot. We can make a case, for instance, when it comes to environmental destruction, that super-progressive action, short of replacing capitalism outright, is the same as centrist action, in the long run. Both routes will still render the planet uninhabitable for most life-forms in the not too distant future. It will put us on different time-tables, and the numbers of preventable early deaths will differ, but the end result is the same.

    As in, if there’s no discernible difference between a Biden and a Trump, eco-wise, then there’s no discernible difference between a Sanders and a Biden.

    Yeah, I know, blasphemy! But when you zoom out far enough, all the world’s a blur.

    (More in the next post)

    ====

    I actually agree that there is a danger in “theyre all the same” thinking.

    But I think there’s an equal danger in saying “Trump is significantly worse than Biden”

    Which is why I go back and forth, and neither position feels quite right.

    For me.

    But of the two, I lean toward “they are ESSENTIALLY the same”. Because of the reason I already stated. On THE critical issue in the entire life of the
    biosphere — both Biden and Trump have doomed us. The rest is just
    trivial compared to that one issue. Just my opinion. Today.
    I might change my mind tomorrow.

    w
    v

    #131475
    wv
    Participant

    One of my ten favorite tweeters. Squirrel.
    ==

    #131479
    Zooey
    Participant

    If we’re on our way out, I want to go with non-fascist tunes playing in the wind.

    Yeah, I think it’s the only answer. Bash on, regardless.

    #131480
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Yes. Helping each other, even in the face of the inevitable fade to black. “Grace” in the non-religious sense. Living by it, bestowing it on others. That’s how we break the cycle. That’s how we guarantee a “win” even if we ultimately lose.

    And I think there is a great deal more meaning and heart to it if we do it without any sense of payoff or benefit, macro or micro, come what may. We just do it, because. We just do.

    Which, again, brings me back to where we went so wrong, and had the chance to go so right . . . moving from feudalism to capitalism, from steady-state, localized, small-scale production for need and use and functionality; production for ourselves and each other, albeit under the thumb of aristocrats . . . to production for an even harder task master, the cold, heartless “market” and the Future, with a new type of aristocrat in charge.

    If only we had cast off the masters, all of them, but retained small-scale, localized, steady-state, use-value production, for each other . . . linked that , one democratic cooperative to another, one cooperative community to another, ever wider, and wider, etc. etc. Still no masters, anywhere. Still producing for each other, not profits, not the invisible hand. If only we had managed to keep the economic sphere from dominating everything else, I think it would have been a thousand times easier to help one another as a matter of course — in all spheres.

    Night, all.

    #131491
    waterfield
    Participant

    ” Biden is still mass-murdering people of color all over the globe”

    Goodbye.

    #131492
    Zooey
    Participant

    ” Biden is still mass-murdering people of color all over the globe”

    Goodbye.

    Why do you think that nobody else reading this thread thinks that comment is even controversial?

    #131664
    zn
    Moderator

    #131722
    wv
    Participant

    #131937
    Zooey
    Participant

    #131943
    Zooey
    Participant

    Well, Katie Halper lets go in this thread.

    #131944
    zn
    Moderator

    #131989
    zn
    Moderator

Viewing 30 posts - 331 through 360 (of 509 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.