Chiefs are releasing RB Kareem Hunt

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Chiefs are releasing RB Kareem Hunt

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #94695
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Ian Rapoport@RapSheet
    The #Chiefs are releasing RB Kareem Hunt. Wow.

    #94696
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Expect scattered tweets n stuff to fill up this thread as the story unfolds.

    Contribute if you find anything!

    #94697
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Michael Giardi@MikeGiardi
    #Chiefs say he wasn’t truthful with the team in discussion. That opened the door for a quick resolution/release. Hunt is subject to waivers.

    #94699
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ProFootballTalk@ProFootballTalk
    Bad nine days for NFL. Adrian Peterson admits that he still spanks son, league says nothing. Reuben Foster arrested, cut, claimed on waivers and paid to not play. Kareem Hunt video that league knew or should have known about emerges out of the blue

    Adam Schefter@AdamSchefter
    Neither the NFL nor the Chiefs viewed the Kareem Hunt video before it became public today, per official.

    Ian Rapoport@RapSheet
    Neither the NFL, nor the #Chiefs, had seen the video before it was published today. I’m told the league made several attempts to obtain it. The hotel said it was corporate policy to only turn it over to law enforcement. Cleveland PD would not provide it to the league.

    #94703
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #94704
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    http://www.tmz.com/category/tmzsports?adid=TMZ_Web_Nav_TMZSports

    TMZ Sports has obtained video of Kansas City Chiefs star running back Kareem Hunt shoving, bull-rushing and kicking a woman in a Cleveland hotel back in February.
    Kareem has not missed a single game this season despite the incident happening MONTHS before the 2018 NFL season kicked off … and team CEO Clark Hunt publicly stated in August he doubted Hunt would be suspended.
    In the video, Hunt is seen arguing with a 19-year-old woman outside of his room at The Metropolitan at the 9 at 3:22 AM on February 10, 2018.
    Hunt turns a corner and confronts the woman, shoving her hard. The woman strikes him back in the face … and that’s when Hunt goes berserk.
    As friends try to hold him back, the 2017 Pro Bowler — who led the league in rushing yards — explodes and knocks one of his friends into the woman … who both go flying into a wall.
    Both Kareem’s male friend and the woman appear dazed — but Kareem makes his way over to the female and kicks her while she’s crouching on the ground … knocking her over.
    Police were called to the scene but no arrests were made. According to police reports, obtained by TMZ Sports, surveillance video from the hotel was obtained by law enforcement. We’re told that video is part of the evidence that was submitted to prosecutors.

    Still, cops did not arrest Hunt and no charges were filed because officers say they were unable to determine if a crime had been committed.
    At the time of the incident, the woman told police the whole thing started because Kareem kicked her out of his room after she refused to hook up with one of the men in Kareem’s entourage.
    Kareem’s friends told cops the woman had gone crazy when asked to leave and called Kareem the n-word … and then struck one of Kareem’s female friends once things turned physical.
    Video thumbnail

    Unclear why the NFL has not taken any action against Hunt. We reached out to the league to find out if they pursued the video. We also reached out to cops to find out if the NFL contacted them about the footage as well.
    The whole incident is reminiscent of the Ray Rice scandal when the NFL star knocked out his then-fiancee in a hotel elevator in Feb. 2014.
    The NFL suspended him indefinitely — but only after TMZ Sports published the brutal knockout video from inside the elevator … video the NFL claimed they had not seen until our story.
    After the incident, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell acknowledged failures in the NFL’s investigative process and said they would overhaul their protocol.
    Since then, the NFL claims it has tried to be tougher on players accused of attacking women — most famously, the league suspended Ezekiel Elliott for 6 games in 2017 stemming from allegations he got physical with an ex-girlfriend in 2016.

    #94705
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    They knew video evidence existed. They all knew. There is no WAY that they didn’t know.

    There is no WAY that this video changes the NFL’s or the Chiefs understanding of what happened, and for them to imply that Hunt denied doing it and had the benefit of the doubt until today is Grade A mercenary BullShit.

    They released Hunt because all of us now know of the existence of this video.

    So…just for emphasis…they did not have a moral conscience about this beating until society found out about it.

    I am disgusted, though in no way surprised, by the mercenary amorality of rich sons of bitches. Fuck them.

    #94706
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    No, seriously…fuck them.

    I am considering here the possibility that I am more disgusted by their cutting Hunt today and trying to pin the fucking embarrassment all on HIM when they OBVIOUSLY KNEW about this, and chose to use Hunt until he became a liability to THEM (I mean…screw the beat up girl, right?), and then they throw HIM under the bus as if the issue is his dishonesty.

    “Oh, me! {sigh} Alas that we believed Kareem when he told us that he didn’t hurt that girl. If we only KNEW…{sigh, moan}.

    Assholes.

    Seriously fucking assholes.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    #94708
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    They released Hunt because all of us now know of the existence of this video.

    yeah.

    i pretty much feel the same way.

    #94716
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Ross Tucker@RossTuckerNFL
    Chiefs making a huge statement with their statement & action.

    This isn’t an aging RB coming off bad year. This is their best chance to go to Super Bowl in 50 years.

    Doesn’t matter. He’s gone.

    Robert Klemko@RobertKlemko
    If the Washington football team claims Kareem Hunt off waivers the entire organization should be stuffed into a cannon and fired into the sun.

    ProFootballTalk@ProFootballTalk
    Chiefs aren’t messing around. Lie to us, and you’re done. Good for the Chiefs.

    Chris Baker@cbakerswaggy
    So if he told the truth then what???

    mark schlereth@markschlereth
    Good question

    #94718
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So…law enforcement and the NFL investigated this, and nobody who knew about the video bothered to inform the Chiefs until 8 months later. I mean…that’s what you have to believe in order to come out and praise the Chiefs right now.

    That is so stupid I have no words.

    #94719
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Anonymous Law Explainer@horsepire
    Here’s a quick thread on Kareem Hunt. Full disclosure: I am a prosecutor, and also a Chiefs fan. I have many thoughts on the TMZ article and video that dropped this afternoon. First, I want to say that while domestic violence is a horrible thing, this isn’t domestic violence

    Domestic violence is between family or household members. When we talk about DV, or use the word “abuse,” we’re talking about violence between people in close, intimate relationships. DV, or “abuse,” is treated very differently from a punch thrown in a bar-room brawl

    There are many reasons for this. Most significantly, because DV occurs in a relationship, there are power dynamics present that don’t exist between strangers. You would report a stranger for throwing a punch; you might not report your spouse. Consequently, DV is under reported

    DV creates what we call a “cycle of violence.” The abuser is violent. The victim doesn’t want to report. If/when he/she does, the abuser, through promises or threats, often coerces the victim to drop charges and come back to the abuser. The cycle begins again.

    There are many examples of DV perpetrated by NFL players, most infamously Ray Rice. Ray Rice knocked his girlfriend out cold. Tyreek Hill, too, was involved in a very bad DV incident. Rice never played again; Hill is one of the NFL’s most popular players

    We have to be careful about sensationalizing Hunt’s conduct as “violence against women.” That marginalizes DV and abuse. If the victim in this incident had been male, the optics would be completely different. But legally, there is no difference either way. This isn’t DV/abuse.

    That doesn’t condone what Hunt did, at all. But if you mention this incident in the same sentence as Ray Rice, Reuben Foster, or even Adrian Peterson, you are making the problem worse, not better, because these things aren’t remotely the same.

    On the other hand, it would be extremely naive to pretend that Kareem Hunt, like 99% of NFL players, isn’t a violent person. As his coach said, the NFL isn’t a tiddlywink contest. This isn’t DV/abuse, but that doesn’t mean Hunt isn’t violent.

    This makes it all the more important to be precise in our reporting, our dialogue, and our understanding of exactly what is going on here. Does the NFL have a problem with DV/abuse? Yes. With violence generally? Yes. In this incident? Not especially.More

    Finally, legally speaking, this is a misdemeanor, if charges were to be filed at all (and they weren’t in February, when it happened). No one was hurt. We don’t know what was being said, or what happened that wasn’t on the video. That is important.

    Kareem Hunt should probably be suspended, maybe 2-3 games. He should be held accountable for his actions. But he should not be made a scapegoat for a very real problem which the NFL has continually failed to address, because this? This ain’t it.

    #94730
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    So…law enforcement and the NFL investigated this, and nobody who knew about the video bothered to inform the Chiefs until 8 months later. I mean…that’s what you have to believe in order to come out and praise the Chiefs right now.

    That is so stupid I have no words.

    The claim was not that they did not know about it, it was that they could not obtain it. That meant they were dependent on his version of the story. Take that for what it’s worth, and I am not siding with the team, but that’s what’s being said. Or…at this point so far, that’s what’s being said right now. Every party involved looks bad in this so getting a clear picture might take a bit.

    #94731
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ==

    #94735
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    The claim was not that they did not know about it, it was that they could not obtain it.

    true. but i don’t believe for a second that they could not obtain it.

    #94736
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The claim was not that they did not know about it, it was that they could not obtain it.

    true. but i don’t believe for a second that they could not obtain it.

    Not legally they couldn’t. Regardless what one thinks, that’s actually credible.

    This has led to the joke that maybe the NFL should just hire TMZ in advance on things like this.

    #94737
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Not legally they couldn’t.

    no. not legally.

    my guess is that it was a convenient excuse. they didn’t want to know.

    #94738
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t care if the Chiefs saw the Instant Replay or not.

    In their own statement, they said that the NFL investigated it. I do not believe that the Chiefs had nothing to go on but what Hunt told them personally. There is no way there were not lengthy conversations between the Chiefs and the NFL office, and between the NFL office and the prosecutor’s office (why no charges when the woman said she wanted to press charges?), and I don’t think there is anything in that video that changed the Chiefs understanding so dramatically that suddenly they have discovered there was Unnecessary Roughness.

    They knew. And they took their chances that it wouldn’t go public, and were already prepared with their response in the eventuality that it got out.

    #94739
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I don’t care if the Chiefs saw the Instant Replay or not.

    In their own statement, they said that the NFL investigated it. I do not believe that the Chiefs had nothing to go on but what Hunt told them personally. There is no way there were not lengthy conversations between the Chiefs and the NFL office, and between the NFL office and the prosecutor’s office (why no charges when the woman said she wanted to press charges?), and I don’t think there is anything in that video that changed the Chiefs understanding so dramatically that suddenly they have discovered there was Unnecessary Roughness.

    They knew. And they took their chances that it wouldn’t go public, and were already prepared with their response in the eventuality that it got out.

    It was just self-defense. She started it.

    KIDDING. Yep dark humor but still kidding.

    In fact that take is out there on the net particularly in twitter. The whole “why is the man the one who is always blamed” thing.

    It just seems like for every step forward we take as a society, we also roll 1000 feet off the side of a cliff.

    #94740
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I just saw someone claim she was drunk, peed on the carpet, and hit him in the face, and wouldn’t leave his room.

    I haven’t read that in a reliable source, but even if it’s true, I feel pretty confident that a professional athlete can handle a drunken woman without kicking her.

    It just seems like for every step forward we take as a society, we also roll 1000 feet off the side of a cliff.

    Yep.

    #94744
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #94757
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I do not believe that the Chiefs had nothing to go on but what Hunt told them personally.

    i don’t know whose version is correct.

    but i figure two situations were in effect.

    legally they had no right to obtain that video.

    or they obtained the video by outside means but chose to ignore it.

    either way they have plausible deniability. they can claim they couldn’t get the video or even if they did they get it they don’t actually have to fess up to that fact since there was no way of legally obtaining it.

    but i find it hard to believe that they wouldn’t thoroughly do their due diligence on this incident.

    i mean even if they were going to cover it up i figure they’d at least want to be prepared in the event that it did get released.

    #94758
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    but i find it hard to believe that they wouldn’t thoroughly do their due diligence on this incident.

    Well to be fair they might not have. There were no charges, no arrest. The police didn’t do anything. So in effect there’s no incident, not at the time. They probably should have. But it’s not all that strange if they didn’t.

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.