Top QBs, by Conference, According to CBS

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Top QBs, by Conference, According to CBS

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #143550
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    #143551
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Interesting. Just one ranking, of course. Lotsa different opinions elsewhere, especially as you get further down the list. But the obvious leap-off-the-page thing is Goff versus Stafford, at least for Rams fans. #5 versus #11.

    All water under the bridge, etc. etc. But how much better would the Rams be right now if they had use of that 3rd rounder in 2021, and the first rounders in 2022 and this year?

    Plus Goff.

    Another way to go (pre-trade) might have been: Keep Goff, get him more weapons, protect him better, coach him up, and rebuild his confidence. Far less costly and better long term, IMO.

     

    #143559
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    but no guarantee of the superbowl.

     

    i think i would go with the superbowl and stafford.

     

    i don’t know if stafford comes back this year.  i don’t know how he stays upright…  hopefully, he’s got another five years in him…

    #143561
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    but no guarantee of the superbowl. i think i would go with the superbowl and stafford. i don’t know if stafford comes back this year. i don’t know how he stays upright… hopefully, he’s got another five years in him…

    Well, we’re talking about the thinking going into the trade, not after the fact. As in, there was no guarantee they’d win the Super Bowl with Stafford, and no reason to believe they couldn’t win it with Goff. Goff had a track record of making it to the Big Dance. Stafford didn’t.

    In short, it was a gamble either way.

     

    #143564
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Well, we’re talking about the thinking going into the trade, not after the fact. As in, there was no guarantee they’d win the Super Bowl with Stafford, and no reason to believe they couldn’t win it with Goff. Goff had a track record of making it to the Big Dance. Stafford didn’t.

     

    ok.  i see.  before the trade i was in favor of keeping goff.  and immediately after the trade, i was still in favor of keeping goff.  but i have no idea how that would have gone.  would mcvay have had the patience to keep developing him?  i don’t know.

    #143577
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Placing Stafford #11 is ridiculous. He has Trey Lance/Brock Purdy rated higher than Matthew Stafford, the ONLY name on that list to win a Super Bowl.

    Jordan Love is rated higher than Stafford. Jordan Love. The man with 606 yards passing in his CAREER.

    Jalen Hurts and Jared Goff are the only other QBs in the conference who ever played clutch in a game that mattered. Ever.

    #143578
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Placing Stafford #11 is ridiculous. He has Trey Lance/Brock Purdy rated higher than Matthew Stafford, the ONLY name on that list to win a Super Bowl. Jordan Love is rated higher than Stafford. Jordan Love. The man with 606 yards passing in his CAREER. Jalen Hurts and Jared Goff are the only other QBs in the conference who ever played clutch in a game that mattered. Ever.

    I think it’s too low for Stafford as well. Good point on Lance, Purdy, and Love. Lance and Purdy don’t really belong together, either, cuz the latter actually played enough to get an idea of his game. Lance hasn’t. I put Lance down toward the bottom, with a big old question mark. Stafford is better right now, from what we know. I’d say a lot better.

    Also, Geno Smith has just that one good season. Yes, he was excellent last year, but it’s his first time, basically, showing up like that. I’d put Stafford ahead of him too. If we factor in age, recent injuries, etc. etc. I’d put Stafford at #6 going into this season (with a potential range up to #2). Would also move Murray up to #7. Geno goes to #8. Love, Lance, and Ridder round out the bottom.

    The AFC side looks a bit more realistic, though I think the author has Wilson too low. He’ll snap back, I’m guessing. Maybe 8th or 9th.

     

    #143579
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    All in all, if we’re talking about feeling really good about a team’s long term future via the QB? On the NFC side, I’m guessing just two teams feel honestly confident:

    Philly and Chicago. And Philly had a crazy good 1st round yesterday, adding Jalen Carter and Nolan Smith to an already solid defense. Ray Charles in the City of Brotherly Love, with all of those kids from Athens. Chicago likely gave Fields a major upgrade at right tackle in Darnell Wright.

    AFC does better on that score right now. First five teams listed, and the seventh, would be my guess.

    #143582
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    All in all, if we’re talking about feeling really good about a team’s long term future via the QB?

    I suspect that is the criterion he’s using. It’s the only one that makes ANY sense whatsoever of that list.

    But even so.

    Matthew Stafford is 35. Kirk Cousins is 34. Geno Smith is 32.

    Matthew Stafford is the fastest players to reach 25K, 30K, 35K, 40K, 45K, and 50K passing yards. His career QB rating is leagues superior to Cousins and Smith. He is possibly going into the HofF. Cousins and Smith won’t ever have their names mentioned as a prospective HofF player.

    The only thing I can say positive about this list is that ALL lists are pretty much bogus. But this one is stupid in addition to being bogus.

    Daniel Jones? Are you kidding me?

    This list is an example of Recency Bias. So he may as well just have posted last year’s QB stats, and called it a day.

    #143584
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Another way to go (pre-trade) might have been: Keep Goff, get him more weapons, protect him better, coach him up, and rebuild his confidence. Far less costly and better long term, IMO.

    I think that’s all true but McV was not the patient coach who was going to coach Goff up. McV seems to be better with vets.

    #143585
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think that’s all true but McV was not the patient coach who was going to coach Goff up. McV seems to be better with vets.

    George Allen.

    #143642
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Another way to go (pre-trade) might have been: Keep Goff, get him more weapons, protect him better, coach him up, and rebuild his confidence. Far less costly and better long term, IMO.

    I think that’s all true but McV was not the patient coach who was going to coach Goff up. McV seems to be better with vets.

    Agreed. McVay lacks patience. Brilliant coach, but impulsive and mercurial, at times. One might even say “fickle” in his football affections. But, I’m still very glad he’s the coach. Just hope he finds a way to smooth the rough edges.

    He might be an excellent candidate for a Zen master to coach him up. Zazen can do wonders.

    #143643
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    mcvay is like a phil jackson. jackson wasn’t really a developer of players. but what he was good at was taking veteran players and molding those parts into a cohesive whole.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.