Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,801 through 1,830 (of 7,927 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Can’t Believe Matt Taibbi Sold Out #143435
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I’m referring to the Twitter files.

    I don’t really know much about it because I don’t really care, but it doesn’t look good for Taibbi.

    My thing on the “doom” is that leftists just can’t get any traction anywhere in the machine. Elect someone, and they are brought to heel almost immediately. Get a platform in the media, some right wing carnivore buys the platform, and moves it to the right. Get an individual voice in the media, and they get paid to compromise on this one tiny issue, and their soul is for sale. Nobody wants to follow Assange or Donzinger.

    Meanwhile, Twitter is always abuzz with wars over Dore, Taibbi, Cenk, Daou, Ritter, you name it.

    My thing is always, “I don’t demand a purity test. These people aren’t my messiah. When I agree with them, I agree with them, and when I don’t, I don’t.” But it appears many people on the left get all “brand loyal” to various talking heads, and then we get civil wars.

    That’s where the “doom” comes from.

    We can’t get traction in the gov’t or in the media. We’re screwed.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 3/30 – 4/7 #143417
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    75 yards in the air and hit him in stride.

    in reply to: The Rams they are a-changin… w/ a big 10/5 update #143412
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Sorry I  can’t format this. I’m on my phone.

    Rams 58 million under 2024 cap

     

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 3/29 #143331
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    No limitations for Matthew Stafford this offseason

    Dunno. In that photo, it looks like he’s looking at his target. I guess it’s still early in the off-season, but that’s a troubling sign.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #143302
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 3/29 #143301
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 3/16 – 3/22 #143300
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Now that is a good looking uniform. w v

    Yep. It was the best of the yellow/blue.

    in reply to: Rams & free agency #143284
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Rams ready to go in 2023.

    in reply to: The police #143283
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator
    in reply to: The police #143282
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: The police #143280
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    How is this cute?

    I would be so pissed if this was my kid.

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #143279
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Didn’t see this coming…

    in reply to: Rams & free agency #143277
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The Rams may be just clearing enough cap space to sign Chris Massey.

    in reply to: high time we had a gender thread #143264
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Rex Chapman@RexChapman An Alabama youth girls’ basketball team that was told they would lose their practice facility unless they agreed to play in a boys’ league went on to win the whole thing — and yet was denied the championship trophy. Instead, the trophies were given to the boys who, to be clear were beaten by the girls in the league final.” End.

    I read somewhere, btw, that the girls team was not awarded the trophy – not because they were girls – but because they were not in the same league or conference or whatever. They were an elite team playing in a league of scrubs or sumthin’. I don’t know why they were admitted in the first place, and it seems like if they were admitted, they should be eligible -cuz what’s the point, otherwise? – but I dunno.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #143262
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: The police #143224
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Meanwhile, in France…

     

    in reply to: Rams & free agency #143213
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, they tendered Hoecht, Jolly, and Rozeboom.

     

    in reply to: Ramsey trade #143190
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i think this is all being done in preparation for 2024. and if stafford was even just five years younger i’d be cool with it. but who knows how stafford looks in 2024. or maybe they have a plan there too. after thinking about it i’m not sure what more they could have done. ramsey held all the cards on this one. and more power to him by the way. i’ll always. almost always. side with the player. if he wasn’t willing to budge on his demands and the rams were set on getting rid of him what more could they have really got for him? if they try to get rid of him next year how does that impact the cap. does it just further delay the inevitable and waste another year of stafford? i don’t know. but it sure seems like they are conceding 2023. with hopes that they can be competitive in 2024. only problem is how good stafford will be in 2024.

    Yeah, it looks like 2023 is over before it starts. But they are reloading for 2024.

    I don’t understand it, but I am also aware that Snead and McVay know more about the football situation and the cap than I do. And they recently delivered a Lombardi. So I will just sit here hoping they are right.

    I just don’t understand giving up on a team so quickly after winning the SB. According to reports, they weren’t even optimistic about last year even before the injuries ensured an awful season. On paper, though, the roster looked pretty much the same minus Von Miller and OBJ. The “general” roster strength besides the Stars seemed more-or-less the same to me, and replacing those guys didn’t seem impossible, even if some ground was lost there in overall quality.

    But trading Ramsey finishes the team off, in my eyes. The CB situation is now looking “JV with upside.” And they still haven’t replaced Miller and OBJ.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #143183
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: Ramsey to be traded? Floyd to be cut? Roster rumors #143162
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The entire league knows the Rams are an easy mark. They give up waay too much for players they want, and they ask for waay too little in comp for players they trade away.

    It sure seems that way to me. Ramsey is still in his prime. Not only do I disapprove of this trade, I can’t even see a plausible rationale for it.

    Hopefully, Rodrigue will explain this some day.

    in reply to: Ramsey to be traded? Floyd to be cut? Roster rumors #143159
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    3rd rounder.

    I give up.

    So for 3 seasons, we gave up two firsts, and the remaining value is a 3rd and a TE.

    M’kay. Better be a damn good TE.

    in reply to: Ramsey to be traded? Floyd to be cut? Roster rumors #143158
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    in reply to: animal bits #143153
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Ramsey to be traded? Floyd to be cut? Roster rumors #143150
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    in reply to: Ramsey to be traded? Floyd to be cut? Roster rumors #143139
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t see it as being as risky as you do. Replacing what Ramsey and Floyd offered in 2022 will not be a great challenge–they both backslid.

    Ramsey was still a top-rated CB this season, and he did it without Donald for a good chunk of the season, and in the general falling off of the pass rush. I saw little of the season, as you know, but I’m not seeing this.

    And letting Matt Gay sign elsewhere is going to save loose change. Are they out scouring bars for a replacement? What’s that about?

    in reply to: Ramsey to be traded? Floyd to be cut? Roster rumors #143128
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    A theory. Several Rams underperformed in 2022 and that’s before they got massively injured as a team. I think they had a few guys who took their rings from 2021 and slacked off. That includes Ramsey and Floyd. I think that’s who they want to replace–I think McV resented that happening. It clears cap space, and puts them in a position to develop talent to step up plus sign people.

    I would think that it would be easier to try to coach Ramsey and Floyd back into the proper mindset than to replace them.

    And, really, how hard must it be to put in the proverbial 110% when the team has completely fallen off a cliff?

    in reply to: Ramsey to be traded? Floyd to be cut? Roster rumors #143126
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Subtracting talent from the team is not “reloading.” All of this looks like the Rams don’t expect to contend next year.

    in reply to: Rams Give Robinson Permission to Seek Trade #143122
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have to say…

    the Rams are quite good at identifying talent, and trading appropriate value to obtain it

    and quite terrible at extracting value for trading away talent they have.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #143118
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: Just a thread for different kindsa interesting things #143077
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

Viewing 30 posts - 1,801 through 1,830 (of 7,927 total)