Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,111 through 1,140 (of 7,214 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams tweets … 2/15-2/28 #143044
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 2/15-2/28 #143034
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams release Bobby Wagner #143028
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    What do you think about this part, Zooey?

    Yeah, I dunno. I agree that they shouldn’t take a hit just to “be nice” to him. He was here one year. It’s not like he was drafted by the Rams and spend 11 years here.

    Why not trade him for a 6th round pick, or something? They got that for Woods, and Woods isn’t going into the HOF.

    in reply to: Rams release Bobby Wagner #143025
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    This is a bad sign, imo. Looks like Rams insiders (including Wagner) don’t think the Rams have enough to compete for a championship. And that they don’t think they can address their needs this year.

    in reply to: Rams release Bobby Wagner #143024
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    From Jourdan at the Athletic:

    The Los Angeles Rams and linebacker Bobby Wagner have mutually agreed to part ways, sources directly familiar with the situation told The Athletic. ESPN was first to report the news. Here’s what you need to know:

    • Wagner, 32, played his first 10 seasons with the Seahawks before joining the Rams last season.
    • He started 17 games for Los Angeles in 2022, totaling 140 tackles (81 solo) with six sacks and two interceptions.
    • Wagner, a 6-time first-team All-Pro, helped Seattle win the 2014 Super Bowl.
    • Sources directly familiar with the conversation said they were “positive” in nature.

    The Athletic’s instant analysis:

    Why both sides agreed to part ways

    Wagner met with the Rams on Thursday for a conversation that one source characterized as really positive, and truly mutual. If it weren’t, the Rams could have saved more money against the cap by cutting or trading Wagner after June 1.

    But that wouldn’t have allowed Wagner to pick his next team or would have meant joining a new team way too late in the offseason to fully onboard with them at his position.

    Wagner is closing in on the final years of his career, and with all the uncertainty surrounding the rest of the Rams’ roster, it’s understandable if he wanted to find a situation that felt more “sure.” That’s why this is mutual.

    Wagner can discuss his options with other teams starting now, a source said, but will officially be released when the new league year begins – reiterating the mutuality of the move. — Rodrigue

    in reply to: Robert Woods Released by Titans #143013
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    He’s 30.

    That’s true. But so is OBJ. Woods and OBJ will be 31 for the 2023 season, and Kupp turns 30 this June. Rams haven’t had a top 50 pick in six years. That takes its toll. Teams with 1st, 2nd, and 3rd rounders, year after year, can mix it up a bit more. They can hit core “need” areas like the trenches, and take a shot at the freakiest wideouts or running backs. The Rams have basically had to strike gold via FA and late rounders instead. That may include players other teams think have passed their prime . . . Regardless, I’m guessing it doesn’t happen.

    The Rams have been trading for PROVEN players which is more of a Sure Thing<sup>TM</sup> than drafting players. They have been stockpiling late draft picks where quantity helps in unearthing quality. They won a Super Bowl doing this, and are in playoff position for this upcoming season.

    Want me to reel off some Top 50 picks that amounted to diddly squat?

    I am perfectly content with this strategy.

    I do think the Rams need another WR (Woods, OBJ, or someone =), and they need to replace Von Miller. And depth everywhere.

    I think the Rams can contend next season, though, if they can keep players on the field.

    in reply to: Robert Woods Released by Titans #143014
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    He’s 30.

    That’s true. But so is OBJ. Woods and OBJ will be 31 for the 2023 season, and Kupp turns 30 this June. Rams haven’t had a top 50 pick in six years. That takes its toll. Teams with 1st, 2nd, and 3rd rounders, year after year, can mix it up a bit more. They can hit core “need” areas like the trenches, and take a shot at the freakiest wideouts or running backs. The Rams have basically had to strike gold via FA and late rounders instead. That may include players other teams think have passed their prime . . . Regardless, I’m guessing it doesn’t happen.

    The Rams have been trading for PROVEN players which is more of a Sure Thing<sup>TM</sup> than drafting players. They have been stockpiling late draft picks where quantity helps in unearthing quality. They won a Super Bowl doing this, and are in playoff position for this upcoming season.

    Want me to reel off some Top 50 picks that amounted to diddly squat?

    I am perfectly content with this strategy.

    I do think the Rams need another WR (Woods, OBJ, or someone =), and they need to replace Von Miller. And depth everywhere.

    I think the Rams can contend next season, though, if they can keep players on the field.

    in reply to: Robert Woods Released by Titans #143002
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    He’s 30.

     

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #142992
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: With the season over, what would you do? #142991
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    PFF lays out Jalen Ramsey-to-Dolphins trade that doesn’t include a 1st-rounder

    I don’t like that trading Jalen Ramsey is even open to discussion.

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #142990
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    You can only shake your head.

    in reply to: the Rams 2023 free agency thread #142986
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The switch from Robert Woods to Robinson turned out pretty bad. Losing OBJ was real bad The RB’s are not scary. I dunno how they are gonna do it, but they need two more scary-weapons, imho, if they are gonna make another run at a Ring. I know the offense can be ‘good’ without two more scary-weapons, but it aint gonna be good ‘enough’ to compete with teams like the Chiefs, etc. And of course they need some sort of ‘answer’ to the problem of the Shannahan-49ers. I dunno if its a different gameplan or personnel or what. w v

    Agree with this do I.

    I don’t think I will ever understand the Woods trade. What was that for? I just don’t get it.

    • This reply was modified 2 years ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: With the season over, what would you do? #142978
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    This post is what can we do, to create cap space. Remember, we are $14 Million over the cap. You would like to get some more space as well, to sign rookies

    Rams have one month to get under the cap. Two moves can get them there.

    It doesn’t take an expert to understand the Los Angeles Rams aren’t in the best shape salary cap-wise. They’re currently $14.1 million over the salary cap, which has been set at $224.8 million for the 2023 season.

    It’s not an issue that they’re over the limit right now because the new league year doesn’t start for another month. On March 15, however, they have to be under the cap, per league rules. They’re also not the only team with more than $224.8 million allocated to players at the moment. There are 13 other teams that are over the cap, too.

    With one month until the deadline, the Rams need to make some moves to clear up some space. Whether that’s releasing players or restructuring their contracts, there are multiple avenues to freeing up money.

    Two simple moves can get them under the cap before March 15, and it doesn’t require them to release anyone. First, they can restructure Cooper Kupp’s contract, thus creating $14.19 million in cap space. That almost gets them under the cap right there. The second move they can make is restructuring Bobby Wagner’s contract, which would save them another $7.75 million in 2023.

    After those moves, the Rams would have $7.82 million in cap space, according to Over The Cap.

    It would make sense for them to tweak those two contracts because it’s highly unlikely that the Rams want to move on from either player anytime soon.

    If they restructure Aaron Donald’s deal, it’ll cause some pain in 2024 in the event that he retires. A restructure of Matthew Stafford’s contract would only save $251,250 in 2023, so his deal isn’t worth touching. Leonard Floyd could conceivably be a cap casualty, and there are rumors swirling about the possibility of dealing Jalen Ramsey.

    Kupp should be on the team for at least the next two years, and the same goes for Wagner. It’s better to restructure the contract of a player who is expected to be on the roster in the coming years than one who could be cut in the near future.

    in reply to: With the season over, what would you do? #142968
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Noteboom I don’t know about. It may actually be that Jackson is better.

    I hope Jackson is better.

    Noteboom still played well at G.

    in reply to: The police #142967
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    JFC

     

    in reply to: With the season over, what would you do? #142963
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t know anything about the cap.

    I think Gaines, Hoecht, and Gay are must re-signs. Love to keep A’Shawn, but that looks unlikely. Perkins will get the minimum, and nobody else is going to give him more, probably, so…fine.

    No way would I release Fuller, Noteboom, Rochell, or Shelton. Fuller was very good when healthy, Noteboom is a solid G and still possible LOT, Rochell is still on his rookie deal (I believe), and Shelton graded higher than Allen (I believe).

    The Rams wouldn’t get anything for Jefferson, so I see no point in trading him. Wagner was the highest rated ILB last year, so trading him makes no sense to me at all.

    in reply to: Everett on the 88 draft (with inside info) #142961
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I remember that draft, and I remember thinking the Rams blew it, and I remember remembering being right about that.

    (Disclaimer: I’m not a draftnik).

    in reply to: mass shootings & guns … including Trump getting shot at #142951
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    it refers solely to gun use in well-regulated militias.

    I’ve never understood how this part has just “disappeared” from the issue.

    It seems pretty obvious to me that this amendment is talking about something like the National Guard. And that’s it. That’s the end of it.

    in reply to: the Rams 2023 free agency thread #142938
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am fine will all of DaSilva’s outcomes (predictions), but I think Nsekhe is worth hanging onto, if possible. I’d like to keep Robinson, too, but I get it. The other guys he has leaving, I have been expecting to leave at the end of their deals anyway.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #142937
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    TMW2023-02-13color.png

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Why are you missing games? Not that it’s “an issue” just actually curious.

    My parents are 93 years old. They live 90 miles from me in my childhood home.

    I spent every weekend August – Thanksgiving moving them into a retirement home. And since the first of January, I have been going to the house every weekend to clean it out, clean it up, and prepare it for sale. Going up tonight for a 4-day weekend, as it happens.

    The only games I saw this year were games played on days other than Sunday, with the exception of the final game against the Seahawks. I saw that.

    in reply to: The police #142885
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #142884
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Looks like I’m not going to be able to watch it after all.

    Fitting end to a season I mostly missed anyway.

    And it looks like a good season to miss.

    in reply to: dumb & awful stuff #142868
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    There is no such thing as a $2.2 million dollar watch.

    I can get a watch for ten bucks that does the same thing.

    The remaining $2,199,990 is just to rub it in everyone else’s face.

    • This reply was modified 2 years ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    • This reply was modified 2 years ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #142864
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Did Jill Biden really give a Grammy to an Iranian protest song? Did I just see that headline?

     

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #142856
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #142842
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 2/2 – 2/8 #142839
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Jerry Jones seems to be thinking VERY long term.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    This is one of those Super Bowls where I have no rooting interest. I will probably watch it. Most of it, anyway.

    I will say that I hope plenty of attention is paid to the fact that Dick Vermeil did not win a super bowl with either team, and that they devote most of their time discussing the one Super Bowl that he did win.

Viewing 30 posts - 1,111 through 1,140 (of 7,214 total)