Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 931 through 960 (of 7,213 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Akers not active (9/17), then traded (9/20) #145502
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So no 5th round value.

    Swap of late round picks means the Rams traded Akers for next to nothing, but at least it’s not nothing.

    in reply to: Akers not active (9/17), then traded (9/20) #145501
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Rams Trade Akers to Vikings

    he Rams have traded Cam Akers to the Vikings, according to CBS Sports Lead NFL Insider Jonathan Jones. The deal reportedly involves a swap of 2026 late-round picks. The trade comes three days after it was initially reported that Akers was on the trading block. Akers was inactive Sunday for the Rams’ 30-23 Week 2 loss against the 49ers.

    On Monday, head coach Sean McVay essential confirmed Fox Sports’ Jay Glazer’s report by telling reporters that general manager Les Snead has spoken with a few teams about Akers, per The Athletic….

    in reply to: Akers not active (9/17), then traded (9/20) #145495
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    One rival executive told Albert Breer that Cam Akers has “zero” trade value right now. Very interested to see what the Rams get for him, if anything

    Yeah, I think he’s worth about a 5th rounder which is why I believe the Rams will get nothing for him. I just seem to have a knack for over-estimating what the Rams should get in a trade.

    In this case, his trade value is not determined solely by how good Akers is. It’s determined by the value difference between Akers and the next best available guy, whoever that is. And Kareem Hunt was unemployed at the start of the season. So would you give up a 5th for Akers when Hunt is free?

    The Browns say nah.

    in reply to: Rams tweets 9/19 & 9/20 #145491
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Colin Cowherd is a bit of a Rams fan, but that’s okay. I am, too.

    in reply to: Akers not active (9/17), then traded (9/20) #145485
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I know this probly has nothing to do with the jettisoning of Akers, but if McVay really wants a ‘more physical’ running game and offense in general, then moving Akers would make some sense. He’s a good back but hardly a ‘punishing’ back. If they can get a 5th round pick for him, I will not complain. I dont think Akers is anything special. Just a good solid back, in my view. And his ball-security trait is problematic. w v

    Like

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #145477
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: injuries going into week 3 #145472
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The 0-2 Bengals, huh?

    Well, that will be interesting.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/17 – 9/18 #145471
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/17 – 9/18 #145464
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator
    Barstool Gambling@stoolgambling
    If you had 49ers -7.5 Rams chose to kick a field goal down 10 as time expires to cover the spread
    ,
    Allen Sales@AllenSales
    Point differentials matter. Especially in a Divisional Game. They use it for tie breakers at the end of the season for playoff seeding. Chargers missed the playoffs in 2021 because of this. You take the points here.

    Lemme say this about that.

    A couple radio talkers on my way to work this morning where scratching their heads, and calling the FG weird, etc., and of course, it screwed some gamblers. Okay. The thing is that if McVay had called some play that had actually resulted in a TD, nobody would be saying anything. You throw a Hail Mary, and score. It blows the spread, too, but nobody woulda thought it was “weird.”

    Why?

    A TD would have been equally futile. Nothing would have been gained, except stats. So why throw a Hail Mary in that situation? Why not just kneel?

    Because ending with a score is fighting to the last second, and that’s what you do.

    So the reason is exactly the same, only the FG is a much higher probability of scoring. It may make even MORE logical sense to go for a FG in that situation than to throw a Hail Mary as the clock runs out.

     

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #145436
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Wow, this is interesting. I couldn’t fit all the stats in an image, but these were the interesting ones anyway. Rams win time of possession, better on 3rd down, total plays. Those 2 TOs, man.

    in reply to: other games 9/17 #145433
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Since Sunday Ticket is now on youtube, I can use the laptop to watch NFL games while cooking. Today I have a bunch of things I have to cook and freeze (diabetes 2 diet management). But I do it with a game on. My game is Detroit/Seattle. Detroit is looking really good. Goff is in a perfect situation for his skill set.

    I thought the youtube subscription was just for the Rams, or maybe they have different packages? I don’t remember. I signed up back in May, I think, and I have forgotten the details, and I haven’t used it yet, since both games were on my TV antenna here.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #145432
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I wish the Rams had won, and they had a shot at this game, but I was expecting it to be a lopsided affair from the start, and I have to take this as an encouraging sign. The Rams victory last week wasn’t a fluke. This team is better than I expected.

    Stafford is significantly better than any point last year. The OL is better. Puka Nacua was a steal. We went from Kupp and a bunch of scrubs to 2 Kupps and an Atwell. I can’t wait to see Nacua and Kupp together. Williams is also promising. The offense looks pretty good, and the TEs haven’t even been worked into the rotation yet. Akers is finished, apparently, and we can hope only that the Rams get something decent in return.

    Kendrick is not selling a lot of jerseys, I’ll bet, but I’m not finished with him yet. The rest of the defense has done alright, although the lack of a pass rush is noticeable, and the Rams would do well to mix in a couple of takeaways every week. McCaffrey gained 116 yards on the ground, but 51 yards were on that one long carry, so he barely cleared 3 yds/att on the other 19 rushes. Purdy had just over 200 yds passing. When you consider the long drives SF had the first half, the Rams handled them pretty well, and if not for the two TOs the Rams had, we might have had an upset.

    I’m looking forward to some analysis from the tape guys this week.

    in reply to: around the league (starting 9/13) #145372
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Found this nugget in a weekend preview article:

    “Lions quarterback Jared Goff hasn’t thrown an interception in 359 passes, the third-longest streak in league history.”

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/13 – 9/16 #145361
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Marc Bulger

    in reply to: around the league (starting 9/13) #145358
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/13 – 9/16 #145357
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Was Bennett or Rypien the backup to Stafford?

    The Rams obviously intended for Bennett to be the #2 this year. They cut Rypien, and re-signed him to the Practice Squad. But they elevated him for Week One – which suggests to me that whatever Bennett’s problem is, it was evident prior to the Seattle game.

    Or maybe it was evident far earlier, but the Rams calculated that somebody else was likely to claim Bennett if they cut him, whereas Rypien was likely to clear.

     

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #145342
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yall probly seen this, but here it is:

    The thing that makes this worse is that it’s unlikely that there were any people in the audience, or in that economic class at all, who would find his comments disturbing.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/13 – 9/16 #145339
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Seattle fans react to the game #145338
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Zooey, I saw the movie, Click… you don’t wanna do that… you’ll be an old Adam Sandler with tons of regret and divorced from Kate Beckinsale Patience, young padawan…

    I wouldn’t take that advice from anyone but you, Mac.

    in reply to: Hurricane Lee #145337
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Isn’t Hurricane Lee the guy who led the Confederate forces?

    in reply to: setting up Rams/9ers #145331
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    NoCal radio blabber laughed hard genuinely yesterday when he was asked if the Rams could pull off an upset of the 9ers.

    He said he watched the game Monday, and thought Seattle imploded. Then he cited several (of the usual) reasons why the Rams are terrible, and said that the 9ers will cover the spread even if they are complacent, and blow them out if they are not.

    All of which kinda feels true to me.

    But then he said, “The Rams are 3 or 4 years away from being competitive” and that’s where he lost me. Cuz…how does that pencil out? Either he thinks Stafford will still be productive 3 or 4 years from now – which would be unusual among your standard-issue radio blabbers – or he (more likely) has no understanding of what the Rams are doing, and where they are in the process.

    All of which is why listening to anybody other than Rams beat reporters is a waste of time.

    in reply to: dumb & awful stuff #145323
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: our reactions to the Seattle game #145313
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: around the league #145301
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The Jets, man. I would hate to be a Jets fan.

    They are in worse shape right now than Seattle. Like Seattle, they entered with season with high hopes, and Rodgers is gone. The final piece to their puzzle was wiped out on the opening drive. A 40-year old QB with a 2-year $75 million guaranteed deal. He might be ready for next year. Maybe. He’s 40. Achilles. It’s bad.

    For myself, part of me is giggling, but part of me misses the storyline that everyone just got robbed of. Aaron Rodgers will be just fine, but his opportunity to “pull a Brady” is gone.

    And the Jets gave up a 1st and two 2nds, and something else for him. Sux to be a J-E-T-S fan.

    in reply to: setting up Rams/9ers #145299
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The third down offense was great vs. Seattle, but it had to be great because the running game on first and second down was not good. I don’t see the Rams offense being able to pull that off versus the Niners and I don’t expect the running game to find its legs against that beast of a defense. Finally I expect the Rams lack of size on the defensive front to be a prominent story this Sunday.

    I agree with all of that. I can’t see the Rams accomplishing much on the ground. I expect most rushing plays to end within 3 yards of the LOS. SFO allowed 3.4 yds/attempt last season. If the Rams can do better than that, I will be happy, but I don’t expect it.

    And on the other side, as you said, I’m not sure the Rams can stop SFO.

    We are definitely going to learn a lot this week.

    in reply to: around the league #145296
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    in reply to: Seattle fans react to the game #145286
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t know if this is overreaction or maybe just close to the truth. Considering the youth of this team, I believe they bought into the hype what this team COULD BE and went straight to buying in without doing the work. Add in the terrible horrible bad Rams team and they all or enough of them chocked this up as an automatic win.

    This may still turn out to be true.

    But those throws and catches were real. Stafford is healthy, and Nakua is real, and Tutu is at least useful as a gadget, and could be more than that.

    The defense and OL could have benefited from Seattle complacency.

    Shanahan will have Frisco ready.

    Let’s go ahead and fast-forward to Sunday because there isn’t much in the week ahead that interests me.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Seattle game #145267
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/11 – 9/12 #145266
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Gonna get a chance to show us what he’s made of next weekend.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/11 – 9/12 #145265
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

Viewing 30 posts - 931 through 960 (of 7,213 total)