Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ZooeyModeratoris it safe to say that the rams offense and defense are both in a better position now than they were in those games against the vikings and lions?
One would think. But I don’t think it’s shown on the field. Part of that was reshuffling the OL again, imo, even though the players they inserted were better (though they lost Hav). But I think the victory over MN was their most impressive of the season. I keep waiting for them to hit top gear now that they’ve had Coop and Puka back for a bit, but they still seem out of sync to me. On offense, anyway.
The defense has steadily improved all year, but this will be a big test because Philly has a really good OL, and Hurts is better at evading the rush. I’m afraid that when the Rams streak into the pocket, they will run right past Hurts. The Rams have improved at contain, but they’re still a work in progress there.
And Barkley might just be too much. Especially with that OL.
Tonight’s game is going to be a serious progress report for the Rams. I think this game will be the most revelatory one of the season to date. The Rams are, like you say, probably in their best position of the season so far, and the Eagles are a real football team. Losing to them won’t kill the season, but beating them would certainly prime the pump for the playoff push, and make up for that loss to Miami.
It’s good that the game is in LA. Not that that is an advantage so much as it is the absence of a disadvantage. Same with Buffalo in a couple of weeks. At least the Rams aren’t travelling 3K miles to play in an ice rink.
ZooeyModeratorPhiladelphia Eagles @ Los Angeles Rams
Defenses know what’s coming when they face the Eagles in short-yardage situations, but that hasn’t made stopping them any easier. Jalen Hurts leads the NFL with eight rushing touchdowns and 23 total rushing conversions on plays with one yard or less to go. In contrast, the Rams defense has struggled in short-yardage scenarios, allowing a league-high 79% conversion rate on plays with one yard or less.
Matthew Stafford has thrived when working outside the pocket, earning an 86.6 passing grade and throwing six touchdown passes—both second-best among qualifying quarterbacks. However, the Eagles defense has effectively limited such opportunities, facing just 49 dropbacks outside the pocket, the third-fewest in the league. When quarterbacks do escape, though, Philadelphia has struggled, allowing a 136.5 passer rating—the fourth worst in the NFL.
Well, that all sounds ominous, and has shaken my hopes. So I retreated into my Strength of Schedule refuge, and did a little research. Found this interesting article by Sharp Football Analysis, the Eagles began the season with the 8th easiest schedule in the NFL, and…their schedule has emerged as even easier than that.
Here is the part I found interesting:
How accurate is Warren Sharp’s model for determining strength of schedule?
Looking at last season’s strength of schedule model:
Of the 15 teams predicted to have the easiest 2023 schedules, 11 finished with winning records (Saints, Colts, Texans, Lions, Jaguars, Steelers, Packers, Buccaneers, 49ers, Browns, and Bengals)
Of the 15 teams predicted to have the hardest 2023 schedules, only 5 finished with a winning record (Bills, Chiefs, Dolphins, Cowboys, and Vikings)
Of the 7 teams forecast to have winning records and predicted to have easier than average schedules, all 7 had winning records (49ers, Bengals, Lions, Jaguars, Saints, Browns, and Steelers)
Of the 7 teams forecast to finish at or below .500 and predicted to have harder than average schedules, all 7 had losing records and 6 went under their win total (Vikings, Broncos, Giants, Patriots, Commanders, and Cardinals)
Are strength of schedule projections accurate?Short answer: YES
Is strength of schedule important?
Of the 15 teams that actually had the easiest 2023 schedules, 10 went to the playoffs (Cowboys, Packers, Texans, Bills, Dolphins, Buccaneers, Eagles, Lions, 49ers, and Chiefs) with 9-of-15 going over their win total
Of the 17 teams that actually had the hardest 2023 schedules, only 4 went to the playoffs (Steelers, Browns, Ravens, and Rams) with 4-of-17 going over their win total
Trying to overachieve against a brutal schedule rarely happens (4 out of 17 in 2023).
Likewise, winning against an easy schedule and overachieving compared to expectations happens often (9 out of 15 in 2023).
ZooeyModeratori like verse’s vibe. a lot. fiske is cool too. but definitely more subdued.
i feel like the rams haven’t had that kind of personality in awhile.
maybe since london fletcher? i don’t know. reminds me of guys like kevin greene and john randle.
LIKE
ZooeyModeratorJust heard. Purdy is out.
NoCal is talking about the draft.
ZooeyModeratorEagles
Saints
Bills
49ers
Jets
Cards
SeahawksI like the fact this is a tough 7 game schedule. (the dolphin loss was an absolute killer)
I assume they can beat the Jets.
Other than that, every game can go either way, in my mind.
Today’s prediction is Losses to Eagles, 49ers, Seahawks. Wins against Bills Cards Jets. I have zero thots on the Saints game. Maybe a tie.
8-8-1
w
vMy Bingo card has a Win over the Eagles. And the Saints, Jets, 9ers, and Seahawks. I think the 9ers are unravelling. Just too many injuries and a shoddy OL. They’ll beat the Seahawks because they’ve beaten them, like, 47 times in a row, and I don’t think that’s going to change. The Jets and Saints are target practice. The Bills will crush them, and I have no idea what will happen with AZ, but it will be winner-take-all, imo.
The 9ers, btw, have the 2nd-hardest remaining schedule. They is done.
ZooeyModeratorThey worked on Purdy’s shoulder before practice yesterday, and held him out. I didn’t hear anything new this morning, but Bosa, Trent Williams, and Purdy were all out yesterday, and there is concern. If they don’t play on Sunday, the 9ers are gonna lose. They probably will lose anyway, but they have no chance without those guys.
I haven’t heard about Kittle’s condition, but he and Williams are the only guys on the OL who can block, and in Kittle’s absence, the 9ers rush game has been bad. It’s still top 10, I think, but without Kittle, it’s been bottom 1/3 of the league the last couple of weeks.
It just isn’t their year. Been there, done that, recognize the symptoms.
Incidentally, Deebo has had a significant falloff in breaking tackles. McCaffrey and Kittle have a lot of mileage, and looks like Deebo is fading, too. The outlook for the 49ers is absolutely brilliant. And to make it even better, some Shanahan grumblings have started, and that makes the picture even rosier. There is speculation that the league has “figured him out.” I think that’s bollocks, and I doubt there is any concern inside 49er headquarters, but it’s fun to listen to the fans whine.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by
Zooey.
ZooeyModeratorRams rookie safety Kamren Kinchens was named NFC defensive player of the week for the second time this season.
— Gary Klein (@LATimesklein) November 20, 2024
ZooeyModeratorTBH, looks like 1 of 3.
And grammatically, I don’t think the word “only” works in this situation.
But I have essays to grade, so I’m out of here.
ZooeyModeratorNoCal radio stations were all slitting their wrists over the 49ers today. Cheered me up a lot.
ZooeyModeratorOh, and Braden Fiske. Another sack and another forced fumble.
2 sacks.
I assume that as a 9ers fan you hate Fiske–not as much as Donald of course but still–yet you should nevertheless try to rise above that and endeavor to be objectively honest.
Oh, I realized my typo almost immediately, and I thought that I could go back and edit it to correct the problem, but then I thought, nobody but a Seahawks fan would be crass enough to point out my error, and here we are.
ZooeyModeratorOh, and Braden Fiske. Another sack and another forced fumble.
ZooeyModeratorDrake Maye looks the part of a starting QB.
The OL was better than last week, but not as good as it was against MN and SEA. Stafford had a few WTF throws again this week, though not as many as last week. I wondered during the game if he has an injury somewhere in his throwing arm. He’s not as sharp as he was to start the season, and Miami beat him up.
There are still seven games to go, and the Rams could tighten things up. The offense just hasn’t gelled, and I will guess that it will. The defense seems to be less about cohesion, and more about raw inexperience and rookie mistakes. There’s reason to be hopeful on that front, too.
The Rams did what they had to do today – beat an inferior opponent – but they didn’t look real good doing it. Even when they were in control on the scoreboard, it didn’t feel like they were in control of the game, and in fact, they weren’t. NE still had a chance in the closing minutes.
I think that loss against MIA is the one they couldn’t afford. They gave away their margin. To reach 10 wins now means going 5-2 to close the season, and that doesn’t look likely. But if they don’t do that, they aren’t really in the hunt anyway. They COULD win the division at 9-8, but that’s not a “serious” team.
To go 5-2, they will probably have to knock off either Philly or Buffalo to make up for the MIA loss, and if they can’t do that, then this isn’t their year anyway. They will also probably face a Must Win against AZ.
ZooeyModeratorJackson, maybe Robinson.
Some of the other guys will be available in September if they have an injury bug at a position. Some of them are just not going to get the vet minimum anywhere.
ZooeyModeratorOkay. Well, I’m not a a loss for reasons for wishing she had won, and I’m a bit jaded etc., but all that is heartening. Nevertheless, we iz fecked.
ZOOEY–I don’t know how in the fuck I did that, but I ended up editing you instead of quoting you. WTF.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 4 months ago by
zn.
ZooeyModeratorI’m sure being a woman of color didn’t help, but yeah…
Right. Which speaks to the fact there are some factions in the Blue or Red pies that are just givens. There is a white supremacist faction that will always go Republican. And Patriarchal ‘family values’ fundamentalist christian faction that will always go Republican. Also a white-wealthy-country-club crowd that will always go Rep. So, yeah, the woman of color thing hurt the pr0-genocide, pro-ecocide, soul-less, mind-numbingly-dull Dem. w v
What they need is an exciting black woman.
ZooeyModeratorOh, thank goodness. I was beginning to think I was the only Rams fan on this board. I feel like I stepped into some kind of weird Dolphin orgy here.
That happened to me at Sea World once. I accidentally slipped and fell into their tank.
For the record, I don’t hear you lamenting that.
But that’s none of my business.
ZooeyModeratorAt any rate, I’m pretty disconnected from Dem-Rep politics, though, these days. So, I dont have a good sense of the exact algebra of why the soul-less Duplicat lost and the Buffoon Replicant won.
But I am curious. (In a quirky, doomer, apocalyptic, wry way. ) I like to keep up on mainstream capitalist-pathology and ecocide-culture. 🙂 So, i will read around, the next few weeks, as i did in 2016. Probly the same exact forces are at play. Same factions.
My gut tells me, that Kamala is John Kerry. She’s Bob Dole. She’s just got a dull personality that did not excite enough people. Shallow amerikunz. Ya know.
Same. I’m curious, but I can already feel my curiosity starting to fade, though my activity in this thread would testify otherwise. But it’s kind of like replaying a car accident in your head, over and over, just to try to get a handle on it. The damage is done, and the fallout will follow. Trump’s victory is bad news in immediate, substantial ways to vulnerable, marginalized groups. But the Grand Arc of biosphere destruction, of imperial devastation, of a sharpening divide of wealth and power…all that marches on either way, so I find myself more interested in trying to protect my future and my kids, and enjoying myself as much as possible than in reading the news headlines.
I didn’t watch any coverage on Tuesday. My wife did. I received some Push headlines that suggested the worst was happening, but it wasn’t until I got up yesterday morning that I actually knew for sure. And I was sick for about an hour, and then I started moving into the autopsy, and trying to figure out how I was going to maintain my mental health over the next four years, and the only answer to that is to restrict the amount of news I digest. That feels like a copout of sorts, but it also seems starkly obvious that I can’t do a god damn thing about any of this.
Leftists often like to say Dems lose because the party moved too far right, and abandoned the working class. (see vid with RD Kelly below) I mean, leftists always say that. Could be truth to that. I dunno. Thats why LEFTISTS didnt like her. But Clinton won twice by moving right. Obama won twice by moving right. I mean, the Dem ecocide-coalition sometimes works. Sometimes it doesnt.
And I think there is some truth to the claim that Ds have moved too far to the right. If the Democrats actually strengthened unions and raised the minimum wage, and provided healthcare and family leave and vacation time and workers’ comp and all that, they probably wouldn’t be facing the angry maga people. But I don’t think it’s an Intellectual, principled choice on the part of voters. Seems to me that the truism that it always comes down to the economy is accurate. The price of eggs, milk, and rent have gone up a lot, and people are feeling squeezed. That’s it. They aren’t thinking about Fed policy and interest rates and any of that. Since neither party is doing a damn thing to reverse those trends – and, in fact, seem united in believing that the working class should experience a little MORE insecurity – they turn to other factors. And for a lot of those people, the next thing on the list is hating the scapegoat for their economic insecurity, and here we are. That gets turned into resentment against lgbtq and immigrants and racial minorities and religious minorities and a bunch of stuff that wouldn’t really feel threatening IF they had enough money to prosper and retire etc. But when you are struggling financially, everything becomes a threat.
Anyway. We’re screwed. Enjoy your evening.
ZooeyModeratorOh, one other thing. I think Nader is right about Vance. I think THAT is the guy Peter Thiel actually wants as president.
ZooeyModeratorroberto clemente@rclemente2121pff / week 9 centers:out of 31 qualifying centers, limmer ranked:#6 overall#4 pass pro#9 run blockingThat’s ridiculous.
This front office should not be fired.
ZooeyModeratorI would rather have Limmer remain at centre and have Avila play LG. Jackson can back up at all 3 interior positions. Probably not going to happen given the money they gave to Jackson.
I’m think that same way, though that is only my eyeballs at work, and I’m not a great observer of OL play.
Hey, where’s RFL?
ZooeyModeratorI am in favor of the Rams dominating and obliterating the Dolphins. I vote for that. w v
Oh, thank goodness. I was beginning to think I was the only Rams fan on this board. I feel like I stepped into some kind of weird Dolphin orgy here.
ZooeyModeratorBernie’s got a vid where he solemnly, calmly states he ‘disagrees’ with Kamala’s Israel policy, etc. I watched it and thought, what if a Nazi politician had done a vid where he ‘disagreed’ with killing all the commies and jews. ‘Disagreed’. Jeezus.
I see a lot of voices (tweeter) on the left trying to make out that Harris lost bc of Gaza, and…you know…that’s not it.
One thing I’ve noticed in my life is that few people get upset at the suffering and deaths of people they do not know personally. Is that a Leftist thing? I’ll have to ponder that.
ZooeyModeratorJordan
@JordanChariton
3h • 17 tweets • 4 min read • Read on X
🧵MAJOR takeaway ignored by Dems in losing to Trump twice in 8 years:Combined Millennial/Gen Z turnout—age 18-44—declined by 7% from 2016 (44% of voters) to 2024 (37% of voters). This was age group @BernieSanders won & galvanized—but Dems & media took him out by the knees.
…
@BernieSanders 2016 (Bernie wave)18-44
44% of voters18-29
19% of voters
Image
@BernieSanders 202018-44
40% of voters
(4 point turnout drop vs 2016)18-29
17% of voters
(2 point turnout drop by 2016)***Lots of young voters felt Dems came together to stop Bernie from winning Dem primary
Image
@BernieSanders 202418-44
37% of voters
(3 point turnout drop vs 2020)
(7 point turnout drop vs 2016)18-29
14% of voters
(3 point turnout drop vs 2020)
(5 point turnout drop by 2016)***Millions of young voters disgusted by Gaza genocide, buried by student loans, deflated in post-Bernie era
Image
@BernieSanders There’s never 1 singular reason a presidential candidate wins or loses an election—but Dems shrinking in youth turnout by 7 points in eight years is significant. The reality is the corrupt elites running the party truly thought if they just put forward Taylor Swift and Beyonce…
@BernieSanders Mixed with “cute” “cool” TikTok videos, that would sway the youth. But young people are not stupid and didn’t support @BernieSanders because he was cool or had celebrity support: they supported him because he was the only one offering them a bold economic reprieve from this…
@BernieSanders New Gilded Age young people are living in. Millennials grew into adulthood while simultaneously being CRUSHED by post 9/11 economic downturn, 2008 financial crash, growing shit-job/job-less/gig-job economy, and as student loan debt slaves…
@BernieSanders Gen Z has mostly had to grow into adulthood in the same growing shit-job/job-less/gig-job economy with the sour cherry on top of the COVID economic collapse…
@BernieSanders In 2020, Millennials/Gen Z in large part held their nose & voted for Biden because they wanted to stop Trump (and I believe bc of Bernie’s strong endorsement of Biden). BUT they were also promised:
✅$15 min wage
✅Public Option
✅Aggressive climate policy
✅$2K checks….
@BernieSanders But they got:
🛑$15 min wage (the parliamentarian!)
🛑Public Option (Biden never uttered it again after election)
🛑Aggressive climate policy (Biden doubled public land drilling)
🛑$1,400 check
🛑Small loan cancellation blocked by Supreme Courty
@BernieSanders Now, you can argue “well it’s more than they would have gotten from Trump!”…But if you are young, haven’t had the economic opportunities that Boomers/Gen X had, and have a hopeless economic future, “the other guy is worse” eventually…
Falls on deaf ears.
@BernieSanders When you add in something young people across the country have repeatedly told me since 2016—”why the hell are we spending all this money across the world while ignoring here”—all of this is a recipe for disaster for Democrats…
@BernieSanders This is not meant to relitigate the whole “Bernie was screwed in 2016 & 2020” argument (but he was). This is to show clearly by the data…turnout among age 50 and under inched toward half the electorate in 2016 when Bernie galvanized the youth—and has dramatically shrunk…
@BernieSanders over eight years since then as the Dem Party blamed Russia for their defeat, moved further right, offered SHORT-TERM economic relief during a deadly pandemic that they allowed to quickly expire, and abandoned the few economic promises they made…
@BernieSanders The takeaway: offering neoliberal crumbs like tax credits, grants, help w/ home down payments (when Wall Street is still allowed to buy up all the housing and double the price)…is not enough for a younger generation with little economic hope, no savings, and buried in debt.
@BernieSanders Maybe instead of listening to their donors and crushing the most popular politician— beloved and energized young people—they should start embracing his politics and putting forth his proposals to win back working class voters of all colors and ages…
@BernieSanders Better chance I develop six-pack abs by Thanksgiving.
ZooeyModeratorRalph on the Dems.
Well…yeah. He’s right about all that, but it seems to me that he overlooks the pretty clear fact that the Democrats want absolutely no part of that agenda. They know what programs are popular among voters. They also know they are unpopular with their donors. They would rather ignore those programs and lose elections than work to pass those programs and lose their donors. Their actions make it crystal clear that have no interest in helping the riff raff. Harris toured with Liz Cheney, promised fracking, and refused to make ANY of the criticisms of society that Nader listed.
ZooeyModeratorI dont have much respect for Bernie anymore (‘my friend Joe’ etc) but he did at least say some useful things to his buddies in the Ecocide-Party. (and i hate TYT, btw, fwiw)
Yeah…I saw Bernie’s statement both on twitter and facebook yesterday, and I didn’t read it. I did watch the video you brought here, and I guess I’m glad he’s found his voice again, now that the bargain he made is at an end, but it feels like too little, too late. His capitulation to the party went exactly the way we all expected it would. He gave up his voice in exchange for a committee seat that got a few things passed that will be a little bit of help to a few people. That was the deal. It wasn’t enough, and now we have Trump again.

ZooeyModeratorI am not seeing much on any of this whole issue that is useful from these groups:
Trumpsters
we hate the dems style leftists
mainstream-news type dems
As a leftist myself, I am a little dismayed that #2 in that list is not proving to be that useful. Anyway. The best arguments I have seen so far, and that hold up, are the more “less noise more analysis” types who point out that in both 2020 and 2024, how the economy was perceived drove turnout and drove the elections.
I’m not following what you are saying here. Are you talking about critiques of the election?
As for the “detailed arguments,” I have to take your word for it because I didn’t see any. However, I didn’t really look. I didn’t watch the convention, I didn’t see/listen to any TV ads, or put any effort into finding her message. I didn’t hear anything about raising the minimum wage, strengthening bargaining power of unions, healthcare, or anything, really. Just stuff like “Biden is the most progressive president in history, blah, blah, blah.” So I guess I wasn’t a responsible citizen this time. But I’m really only interested in what politicians actually DO, not what they say/imply they will do, so….
ZooeyModeratorWell, yes, we have the ability to ruin things for us and the majority of the creatures most similar to us, but as Stephen J Gould pointed out, we couldn’t destroy all life on Earth even if we wanted to. Life (even higher life forms) have survived global catastrophes greater than we can bring about. We are here indirectly as a result of the last one. And ultimately, our efforts would destroy us before we could exterminate everything else.
Well, my son tells me that we are pretty close to killing all the plankton that live in the ocean, and that the plankton produces far more oxygen than the rainforests do, and when the plankton goes, everything above it on the food chain goes.
I think if we get down to plankton level, Stephen J Gould’s contributions to science won’t matter much to anything left.
ZooeyModeratorThough that’s not what I said. Or it’s not quite it. The election had to do with the money guys funding the message to the lower rung base, and the message had to do with the usual anxieties and moral panics about migrants, race, sexuality, and etc. plus believing that price gouging was inflation. Don’t account for that, and you don’t account for this election. It’s this, to sum it all up in one joke:
My argument is that it wasn’t so much the power of the money guys’ message about immigrants etc. as it was apathy towards Harris’ non-message.
I think it is both…but the fact that Trump’s vote total is more or less the same, and Harris’ vote total is WAAAAAAAAAY down from Biden’s suggests that it had more to do with her than him. Basically.
ZooeyModeratorSo YOU’RE why Trump won. I agree. I don’t know how you fight the system when it has so much influence and power over every aspect of daily life. This has to be unprecedented. No society in history has been under this much control while not realizing they are under control. Like you, what bothers me the most is the effect this is having on the environment. Propelling the “6th Extinction”. However, I get some relief knowing humans will be dead before the planet is. Earth will get the last laugh
I dunno what you mean by “the planet.” I think in 100 years, give or take a coupla decades, the only living thing on this planet will be those freaky things that live on the bottom of the ocean along the volcanic vents. We are headed for a hard reset.
And I think wv is right. There is absolutely no chance of fixing this. Sociopathic greed monsters control “reality,” and you can’t argue people out of their realities. It doesn’t matter how much evidence you have. From time-to-time somebody will “get it,” and see what’s happening, but there is no chance whatsoever of changing the system. At least not until it collapses of its own accord, and that will happen, but it will be environmental collapse that makes the system go belly up, and there’s nothing left to do at that point but write epitaphs anyway.
Trump’s victory brings some unnecessary suffering into the equation earlier, and pointlessly. But the window began to shut somewhere in the 60s, and slammed shut when Clinton sold the Democrat party to Wall St.
ZooeyModeratorHow Trump won the election
Jason Hickel
All the takes about Trump winning the US election are correct and yet they also miss the point.
Yes, it was insane for the Democrats to think they could win by running a soulless candidate, without a shred of progressive policy vision, pursuing endorsements from neocon war-hawks everybody hates, while arming and funding a genocide, and belittling and crushing those who have enough morality to protest it. It is enraging that the Democrats are so smug and blind to this.
But these are all just symptoms. The deeper reality is that liberalism has failed, liberalism is dead, and people urgently need to wake up to this fact and respond accordingly.
Progressive
It is a defunct ideology that cannot offer any meaningful solutions to our social and ecological crises and it must be abandoned.
Democrats have proven over and over again that they cannot accept even basic steps like public healthcare, affordable housing, and a public job guarantee – things that would dramatically improve the material, social and political conditions of the working classes.
And they cannot accept a public finance strategy that would steer production away from fossil fuels and toward green transition to give us a shot at a liveable future.
Why? Because these things run against the objectives of capital accumulation. And for liberals capital is sacrosanct.
They will do whatever it takes to ensure elite accumulation, it is their only consistent commitment. At home, they suppress and demonise progressive and socialist tendencies.
Risk
Abroad, they engage in endless wars and violence to suppress input prices in the global South and prevent any possibility of sovereign economic development.
The Democrats have done all this purposefully and knowingly, for my whole life, not as some kind of ‘mistake’ but in full consciousness that it is in the interests of capital.
And because liberalism cannot address our crises, and because it crushes socialist alternatives, it inevitably paves the way for right-wing populism.
They know this pattern, and yet they risk it every time – this election being only the most recent example.
Formidable
They did it in 2016, when they actively crushed the Sanders campaign and sent Trump to the White House. They do it because ultimately they – and I mean the liberal ruling class here – don’t really mind if fascists take power, so long as the latter too ensure the conditions for capital accumulation.
They 100 per cent prefer this to the possibility of a socialist alternative. So, progressives have to face reality. The dream of “converting” the Democratic party is dead.
This is now a fact and it must be accepted. The only option is to build a mass-based movement that can reclaim the working classes and mobilize a political vehicle that can integrate disparate progressive struggles into a unified and formidable political force and achieve substantive transformation.
This will take real work, actual organizing, but it must be done and that process must begin now.
This Author
Jason Hickel is a professor at ICTA-UAB and visiting senior fellow at the LSE, London. He is author of The Divide and Less Is More. He writes about global inequality, political economy and ecological economics. This commentary first appeared at X.com where Jason uses the handle @jasonhickel.org
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 4 months ago by
Zooey.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

