Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 7,070 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams at Saints…setting up the game #153551
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I got the Rams winning this one by about 45 points, and I hope I don’t have to face all the accusations against me as a pessimist again. So fatiguing.

    in reply to: Rams injuries & roster stuff, for week 13/game 12 #153542
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Jourdan Rodrigue‬ ‪@jourdanrodrigue.bsky.social‬
    Rams LT Alaric Jackson did not practice today with a foot injury.

    Did he practice without one?

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 11/25 – 11/27 #153531
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    if you can’t protect QB or stop the run you have nothing.

    The first rule of football.

    in reply to: around the league, week 13 #153530
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I agree on SF.

    They’re done this year, and probably done for a while.

    They are 5-6, and have BUF, CHI, LA, MIA, DET, and AZ left to play. That’s 3-3, probably, maybe even 2-4. They are going to wind up a game or 2 under .500 this year. Kittle, McCaffrey, and Samuel all have their best years behind them. They may not “jenga,” as Colin puts it, but I don’t think they are back in the championship mix next year. If Pearsall comes through, and they rebuild their OL, and Aiyuk returns in top form, they can do better than they did this year, but they are a couple of drafts away from being a threat again.

    It’s funny that Colin got the business from 9er fans for making this observation. The principal radio heads have folded on the season, at least, and started doing the math on a rebuild.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Eagles game #153516
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Sigh. 5-6.

    Saints
    Bills
    49ers
    Jets
    Cards
    Seahawks

    To have a winning season, they have to go 4-2, now.

    This is officially, a ‘disappointing season’ btw.

    w
    v

    Looks like 5-1 to me. Honestly. They are better than all of those teams except the Bills, who will undoubtedly crush the crap out of them.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Eagles game #153511
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Didnt see the game. Saw the box-score. Barkley had 255 yards??
    Jeezus.

    Rams iz mediocre, i guess.

    Rushing yards. 302 total yards.

    The Eagles are better. That was clear by the 2nd quarter. The first two drives the Rams put up were impressive, but the Eagles tweaked something, and that was the end of it. Clearly better at the LOS on both sides, and the Eagles fixed their secondary problems in one draft. Cooper Dejean is everything he was hyped up to be going into the draft. That is a complete team. They got a great QB, RB, and WR, and excellent lines. The Philly-Detroit Championship game is one I will watch start-to-finish.

    Last night, the absence of Ernest Jones was glaring. I can see the Rams playing better than they did last night. Getting Havenstein back will help, and Higbee. But the Rams are not a threat to the top tier teams, even if the D continues to mature.

    I blame Aaron Donald.

    in reply to: Other games around the league, 11/24 #153495
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I do want the Patz to beat Miami.

    May the other wishes you have for today’s games bear better fruit.

    in reply to: setting up the Philly game #153494
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    When the Rams got their OL all beat up before the bye, it took a couple of games for decent replacements to come through. When they did–with Limmer and Dedich–it worked fine. That was the OL against Minn.

    Then when, for no gawd damm good reason whatsoever, they played 3 OL replacements with all 3 just coming back from having been out with injuries, that’s when we got the Miami game.

    They fixed that by bringing back Limmer. Avila has had a couple of games now and so should be settling in. McClendon is better than Mr. “Lesson The Rams Can’t Seem to Learn” Noteboom. This OL ought to be approaching the level of play they had in the Minn. game. Avila is the best lineman they’ve had since Whitworth and so as he gets into game shape, they ought to improve as a unit.

    Right. Yeah. So, theoretically, the Rams OL should be on the same Gel course that they were entering MN, only with superior players. And that’s what the Rams are gonna need today if they plan on scoring more points than Philadelphia does.

    in reply to: Other games around the league, 11/24 #153493
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I will add… the NFC West games are important this week. If the Cardinals beat Seattle, while the 9ers lose to GB and the Rams lose to Philly – which is a pretty strong possibility – the Cardinals are 7-4 while the other teams fall to 5-6. They would take command of the division. I think SF and SEA would then absolutely kiss the season goodbye. They would both be 1-3 in the division and with harder schedules in front of them than AZ has.

    And it would leave the Rams in longshot position.

    This game against Philly is really important, in my view. They have to steal one down the stretch, and it’s either Philly or Buffalo, and I think Philly is lower-hanging fruit.

    in reply to: around the league week 12 #153486
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I remember that play bc I’m a Dodgers fan, and I watch the postseason. Mookie is my favorite player right now, both bc he’s so damn good, and bc he just loves what he’s doing. He’s always smiling and laughing. Just seems to love life. It’s good to have those people around.

    in reply to: setting up the Philly game #153485
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    is it safe to say that the rams offense and defense are both in a better position now than they were in those games against the vikings and lions?

    One would think. But I don’t think it’s shown on the field. Part of that was reshuffling the OL again, imo, even though the players they inserted were better (though they lost Hav). But I think the victory over MN was their most impressive of the season. I keep waiting for them to hit top gear now that they’ve had Coop and Puka back for a bit, but they still seem out of sync to me. On offense, anyway.

    The defense has steadily improved all year, but this will be a big test because Philly has a really good OL, and Hurts is better at evading the rush. I’m afraid that when the Rams streak into the pocket, they will run right past Hurts. The Rams have improved at contain, but they’re still a work in progress there.

    And Barkley might just be too much. Especially with that OL.

    Tonight’s game is going to be a serious progress report for the Rams. I think this game will be the most revelatory one of the season to date. The Rams are, like you say, probably in their best position of the season so far, and the Eagles are a real football team. Losing to them won’t kill the season, but beating them would certainly prime the pump for the playoff push, and make up for that loss to Miami.

    It’s good that the game is in LA. Not that that is an advantage so much as it is the absence of a disadvantage. Same with Buffalo in a couple of weeks. At least the Rams aren’t travelling 3K miles to play in an ice rink.

    in reply to: setting up the Philly game #153478
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Philadelphia Eagles @ Los Angeles Rams

    Defenses know what’s coming when they face the Eagles in short-yardage situations, but that hasn’t made stopping them any easier. Jalen Hurts leads the NFL with eight rushing touchdowns and 23 total rushing conversions on plays with one yard or less to go. In contrast, the Rams defense has struggled in short-yardage scenarios, allowing a league-high 79% conversion rate on plays with one yard or less.

    Matthew Stafford has thrived when working outside the pocket, earning an 86.6 passing grade and throwing six touchdown passes—both second-best among qualifying quarterbacks. However, the Eagles defense has effectively limited such opportunities, facing just 49 dropbacks outside the pocket, the third-fewest in the league. When quarterbacks do escape, though, Philadelphia has struggled, allowing a 136.5 passer rating—the fourth worst in the NFL.

    Well, that all sounds ominous, and has shaken my hopes. So I retreated into my Strength of Schedule refuge, and did a little research. Found this interesting article by Sharp Football Analysis, the Eagles began the season with the 8th easiest schedule in the NFL, and…their schedule has emerged as even easier than that.

    Here is the part I found interesting:

    How accurate is Warren Sharp’s model for determining strength of schedule?

    Looking at last season’s strength of schedule model:

    Of the 15 teams predicted to have the easiest 2023 schedules, 11 finished with winning records (Saints, Colts, Texans, Lions, Jaguars, Steelers, Packers, Buccaneers, 49ers, Browns, and Bengals)
    Of the 15 teams predicted to have the hardest 2023 schedules, only 5 finished with a winning record (Bills, Chiefs, Dolphins, Cowboys, and Vikings)
    Of the 7 teams forecast to have winning records and predicted to have easier than average schedules, all 7 had winning records (49ers, Bengals, Lions, Jaguars, Saints, Browns, and Steelers)
    Of the 7 teams forecast to finish at or below .500 and predicted to have harder than average schedules, all 7 had losing records and 6 went under their win total (Vikings, Broncos, Giants, Patriots, Commanders, and Cardinals)
    Are strength of schedule projections accurate?

    Short answer: YES

    Is strength of schedule important?

    Of the 15 teams that actually had the easiest 2023 schedules, 10 went to the playoffs (Cowboys, Packers, Texans, Bills, Dolphins, Buccaneers, Eagles, Lions, 49ers, and Chiefs) with 9-of-15 going over their win total

    Of the 17 teams that actually had the hardest 2023 schedules, only 4 went to the playoffs (Steelers, Browns, Ravens, and Rams) with 4-of-17 going over their win total

    Trying to overachieve against a brutal schedule rarely happens (4 out of 17 in 2023).

    Likewise, winning against an easy schedule and overachieving compared to expectations happens often (9 out of 15 in 2023).

    in reply to: Verse, Fiske, & the Rams DL since week 8 #153468
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i like verse’s vibe. a lot. fiske is cool too. but definitely more subdued.

    i feel like the rams haven’t had that kind of personality in awhile.

    maybe since london fletcher? i don’t know. reminds me of guys like kevin greene and john randle.

    LIKE

    in reply to: around the league week 12 #153467
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Just heard. Purdy is out.

    NoCal is talking about the draft.

    in reply to: setting up the Philly game #153465
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Eagles
    Saints
    Bills
    49ers
    Jets
    Cards
    Seahawks

    I like the fact this is a tough 7 game schedule. (the dolphin loss was an absolute killer)

    I assume they can beat the Jets. 🙂 Other than that, every game can go either way, in my mind.

    Today’s prediction is Losses to Eagles, 49ers, Seahawks. Wins against Bills Cards Jets. I have zero thots on the Saints game. Maybe a tie.

    8-8-1

    w
    v

    My Bingo card has a Win over the Eagles. And the Saints, Jets, 9ers, and Seahawks. I think the 9ers are unravelling. Just too many injuries and a shoddy OL. They’ll beat the Seahawks because they’ve beaten them, like, 47 times in a row, and I don’t think that’s going to change. The Jets and Saints are target practice. The Bills will crush them, and I have no idea what will happen with AZ, but it will be winner-take-all, imo.

    The 9ers, btw, have the 2nd-hardest remaining schedule. They is done.

    in reply to: around the league week 12 #153462
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    They worked on Purdy’s shoulder before practice yesterday, and held him out. I didn’t hear anything new this morning, but Bosa, Trent Williams, and Purdy were all out yesterday, and there is concern. If they don’t play on Sunday, the 9ers are gonna lose. They probably will lose anyway, but they have no chance without those guys.

    I haven’t heard about Kittle’s condition, but he and Williams are the only guys on the OL who can block, and in Kittle’s absence, the 9ers rush game has been bad. It’s still top 10, I think, but without Kittle, it’s been bottom 1/3 of the league the last couple of weeks.

    It just isn’t their year. Been there, done that, recognize the symptoms.

    Incidentally, Deebo has had a significant falloff in breaking tackles. McCaffrey and Kittle have a lot of mileage, and looks like Deebo is fading, too. The outlook for the 49ers is absolutely brilliant. And to make it even better, some Shanahan grumblings have started, and that makes the picture even rosier. There is speculation that the league has “figured him out.” I think that’s bollocks, and I doubt there is any concern inside 49er headquarters, but it’s fun to listen to the fans whine.

    • This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. 11/21 – 11/23 #153449
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 11/19 – 11/20 #153412
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    TBH, looks like 1 of 3.

    And grammatically, I don’t think the word “only” works in this situation.

    But I have essays to grade, so I’m out of here.

    in reply to: around the league, week 11 #153391
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    NoCal radio stations were all slitting their wrists over the 49ers today. Cheered me up a lot.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Patz game #153372
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, and Braden Fiske. Another sack and another forced fumble.

    2 sacks.

    I assume that as a 9ers fan you hate Fiske–not as much as Donald of course but still–yet you should nevertheless try to rise above that and endeavor to be objectively honest.

    Oh, I realized my typo almost immediately, and I thought that I could go back and edit it to correct the problem, but then I thought, nobody but a Seahawks fan would be crass enough to point out my error, and here we are.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Patz game #153369
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, and Braden Fiske. Another sack and another forced fumble.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Patz game #153367
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Drake Maye looks the part of a starting QB.

    The OL was better than last week, but not as good as it was against MN and SEA. Stafford had a few WTF throws again this week, though not as many as last week. I wondered during the game if he has an injury somewhere in his throwing arm. He’s not as sharp as he was to start the season, and Miami beat him up.

    There are still seven games to go, and the Rams could tighten things up. The offense just hasn’t gelled, and I will guess that it will. The defense seems to be less about cohesion, and more about raw inexperience and rookie mistakes. There’s reason to be hopeful on that front, too.

    The Rams did what they had to do today – beat an inferior opponent – but they didn’t look real good doing it. Even when they were in control on the scoreboard, it didn’t feel like they were in control of the game, and in fact, they weren’t. NE still had a chance in the closing minutes.

    I think that loss against MIA is the one they couldn’t afford. They gave away their margin. To reach 10 wins now means going 5-2 to close the season, and that doesn’t look likely. But if they don’t do that, they aren’t really in the hunt anyway. They COULD win the division at 9-8, but that’s not a “serious” team.

    To go 5-2, they will probably have to knock off either Philly or Buffalo to make up for the MIA loss, and if they can’t do that, then this isn’t their year anyway. They will also probably face a Must Win against AZ.

    in reply to: Rams free agents – who do they keep? #153326
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Jackson, maybe Robinson.

    Some of the other guys will be available in September if they have an injury bug at a position. Some of them are just not going to get the vet minimum anywhere.

    in reply to: the election #153164
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

     

    Okay. Well, I’m not a a loss for reasons for wishing she had won, and I’m a bit jaded etc., but all that is heartening. Nevertheless, we iz fecked.

    ZOOEY–I don’t know how in the fuck I did that, but I ended up editing you instead of quoting you. WTF. 

    • This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: the election #153158
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’m sure being a woman of color didn’t help, but yeah…

    Right. Which speaks to the fact there are some factions in the Blue or Red pies that are just givens. There is a white supremacist faction that will always go Republican. And Patriarchal ‘family values’ fundamentalist christian faction that will always go Republican. Also a white-wealthy-country-club crowd that will always go Rep. So, yeah, the woman of color thing hurt the pr0-genocide, pro-ecocide, soul-less, mind-numbingly-dull Dem. w v

    What they need is an exciting black woman.

    Michelle obama sale glitter

    in reply to: setting up the Miami game (MNF) #153150
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, thank goodness. I was beginning to think I was the only Rams fan on this board. I feel like I stepped into some kind of weird Dolphin orgy here.

    That happened to me at Sea World once. I accidentally slipped and fell into their tank.

    For the record, I don’t hear you lamenting that.

    But that’s none of my business.

    in reply to: the election #153149
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    At any rate, I’m pretty disconnected from Dem-Rep politics, though, these days.   So, I dont have a good sense of the exact algebra of why the soul-less Duplicat lost and the Buffoon Replicant won.

    But I am curious.   (In a quirky, doomer, apocalyptic, wry way. )   I like to keep up on mainstream capitalist-pathology and ecocide-culture.  🙂     So, i will read around, the next few weeks, as i did in 2016.    Probly the same exact forces are at play.  Same factions.

    My gut tells me, that Kamala is John Kerry.  She’s Bob Dole.  She’s just got a dull personality that did not excite enough people.   Shallow amerikunz.  Ya know.

    Same. I’m curious, but I can already feel my curiosity starting to fade, though my activity in this thread would testify otherwise. But it’s kind of like replaying a car accident in your head, over and over, just to try to get a handle on it. The damage is done, and the fallout will follow. Trump’s victory is bad news in immediate, substantial ways to vulnerable, marginalized groups. But the Grand Arc of biosphere destruction, of imperial devastation, of a sharpening divide of wealth and power…all that marches on either way, so I find myself more interested in trying to protect my future and my kids, and enjoying myself as much as possible than in reading the news headlines.

    I didn’t watch any coverage on Tuesday. My wife did. I received some Push headlines that suggested the worst was happening, but it wasn’t until I got up yesterday morning that I actually knew for sure. And I was sick for about an hour, and then I started moving into the autopsy, and trying to figure out how I was going to maintain my mental health over the next four years, and the only answer to that is to restrict the amount of news I digest. That feels like a copout of sorts, but it also seems starkly obvious that I can’t do a god damn thing about any of this.

    Leftists often like to say Dems lose because the party moved too far right, and abandoned the working class. (see vid with RD Kelly below) I mean, leftists always say that.   Could be truth to that.  I dunno.  Thats why LEFTISTS didnt like her.  But Clinton won twice by moving right.  Obama won twice by moving right.   I mean, the Dem ecocide-coalition sometimes works.  Sometimes it doesnt.

    And I think there is some truth to the claim that Ds have moved too far to the right. If the Democrats actually strengthened unions and raised the minimum wage, and provided healthcare and family leave and vacation time and workers’ comp and all that, they probably wouldn’t be facing the angry maga people. But I don’t think it’s an Intellectual, principled choice on the part of voters. Seems to me that the truism that it always comes down to the economy is accurate. The price of eggs, milk, and rent have gone up a lot, and people are feeling squeezed. That’s it. They aren’t thinking about Fed policy and interest rates and any of that. Since neither party is doing a damn thing to reverse those trends – and, in fact, seem united in believing that the working class should experience a little MORE insecurity – they turn to other factors. And for a lot of those people, the next thing on the list is hating the scapegoat for their economic insecurity, and here we are. That gets turned into resentment against lgbtq and immigrants and racial minorities and religious minorities and a bunch of stuff that wouldn’t really feel threatening IF they had enough money to prosper and retire etc. But when you are struggling financially, everything becomes a threat.

    Anyway. We’re screwed. Enjoy your evening.

    in reply to: the election #153142
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, one other thing. I think Nader is right about Vance. I think THAT is the guy Peter Thiel actually wants as president.

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 11/6 – 11/7 #153140
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator
    roberto clemente@rclemente2121
    pff / week 9 centers:
    out of 31 qualifying centers, limmer ranked:
    #6 overall
    #4 pass pro
    #9 run blocking

    That’s ridiculous.

    This front office should not be fired.

    in reply to: injuries & roster issues for week 10/game 9 #153139
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I would rather have Limmer remain at centre and have Avila play LG. Jackson can back up at all 3 interior positions. Probably not going to happen given the money they gave to Jackson.

    I’m think that same way, though that is only my eyeballs at work, and I’m not a great observer of OL play.

    Hey, where’s RFL?

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 7,070 total)