Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Zooey
ModeratorThere’s an “NFL Campus” at the Kronkatorium.
An nfl campus.
What will they teach there?
w
vEthics.
LOL
Zooey
ModeratorSee?
We are all counting on the updates because it’s slow around here. There isn’t one damn thing that Rams fans can think of to talk about. And we gotta keep talking. Otherwise there could be an awkward Bro Pause.
Zooey
ModeratorPlease keep all of us updated on your continuing email interaction.
It’s a slow time of year.
Zooey
ModeratorYeah. Stan was not interested in St. Louis at all. Plan B may have been London. He wasn’t after a new stadium. He was after Something Bigger.
Yes, something bigger. Money, power, ego, etc, etc.
The Usual.And when Georgia/Shaw took the team away from LA,
it was much the same. Mainly money.What did you think of the Costas audio.
He talks about this stuff.w
vI didn’t agree with him on the baseball stuff. I agreed with him on the Rams stuff more or less with the exception that I don’t think St. Louis had no chance. Moving to LA wasn’t a sure thing. The fix was not in. I thought from the first time I saw the scope of the project and heard that he was paying for it privately that there wasn’t much chance it would be turned down, but I think Carson and St. Louis both made legitimate runs that were taken seriously. I’m not at all surprised it fell out the way it did, but it wasn’t a sure thing, so I think Costas overstates all of that. I thought he was good on the inherent nature of violence in football and the way he distinguished it from domestic violence, steroids, corruption of the NCAA and so on. When I heard, though, that Glenn Frey is dead and realized they were going to talk about that, I ejected, because I always loathed the Eagles.
Zooey
ModeratorI know of one Rams executive who showed up at the league meetings in Chicago in August (at the time of disturbances over the 1-year anniversary of Ferguson) and greeted a national writer w/the following: “Another day, another riot in St. Louis.”
Hmm, you’ll never see race riots in L.A.!
About this statement: It really gives you a glimpse into the culture of the St. Louis Rams’ organization. And, like any organization, that culture starts with the leader at the top. I’ll be interested in reading the PD’s story on Sunday, but just from JT’s chat here, it sure looks like what happened is that SK decided long ago that he would grow his fortune in L.A., and that everything the Rams’ organization did over the next few years would go toward that goal. Goodell was on board, and obviously knew more about that plan than he said publicly. It really wasn’t that long ago that the organization admitted that it was actively trying to move to L.A. Even after it came to light about the Inglewood site, the NFL and the Rams made comments to try to downplay it. Now, if you’re in the middle of a negotiation that could end up with your team staying in St. Louis, you would leverage that new property acquisition for a better deal in St. Louis. THERE WAS NEVER GOING TO BE A DEAL IN ST. LOUIS FOR STAN KROENKE. He was put all of his chips on L.A., and with Goodell as the dealer, he got the right cards in the end.
Btw, this has been hard, trying to ignore the NFL the past few weeks. The NFL Playoffs was always my favorite sporting event, even with the Rams rarely in it. But, I have to try. I haven’t missed a Super Bowl since I can remember. It will be really weird not having it on in my house. It’s SUPER weird not watching the playoffs. I actually turned on an old episode of Columbo during the Arizona-Green Bay game.
I gotta think that Kroenke started considering LA when Georgia wen into hospice, and got serious when Chip and Lucia acknowledged that they would sell.
And…there is an article at CBS right now that say the Rams have become the 3rd most valuable franchise in the NFL since the announcement. Where were they before? 2nd or 3rd from the bottom?
Yeah. Stan was not interested in St. Louis at all. Plan B may have been London. He wasn’t after a new stadium. He was after Something Bigger.
Zooey
ModeratorHappy birthday, RM. And thank you.
Zooey
ModeratorJust as I said going back many years. Knowing of the top tier clause almost from its inception I knew in my heart it was in John Shaw’s mind that the Rams were eventually moving back to LA.
I have read this opinion voiced by other posters, too.
It is nonsense. Sure Shaw got St. Louis to put a clause in the lease that was likely to give the Rams an escape, but if Shaw’s plan was for the Rams to return to LA, he’s an idiot. They left LA for TWENTY YEARS! That’s plenty of time for some other team to move to LA, or for the NFL to put an expansion team there. In fact, I would say that nobody would have bet money that LA would still have no team in 2015.
Zooey
ModeratorRetail rental was $25 sq. ft in 2013.
And there is 890,000 sq ft of that.
So that’s over $22 million per month.
So Retail + Office + Rams only = > $100,000,000/year. Never mind the housing, casino, theatre, hotels, parking lots, concessions, and merchandising. And local radio rights and whatever. Plus whatever Spanos pays to lease the stadium, as well as other uses of it, plus the advertising and naming rights. TV revenue.
Yeah, he’s going to need a couple dozen CPAs just to count the money.
Zooey
ModeratorI can’t even imagine what a complex like that would bring in on a yearly basis.
Anyone?
More than all of us on this board combined will earn in our lifetimes.
There’s a casino. A 300-room hotel. 3,000 residences (mostly single-family and townhouses), a shopping center, and a 6,000 seat theatre.
Oh, and office space. 780,000 sq. feet of office space. The current average rental in LA county is $2.51 per sq. ft. per month for office space. So the office space alone will generate about $2 million each month IF they charge the AVERAGE rate which they probably won’t.
The stadium is supposed to seat 80,000 with another 20,000 in standing room. Let’s go with 80,000 times an average ticket price of $100 times ten home games. That is $80 million in tickets.
Zooey
ModeratorThe good news, though, is that the NFL runs a “keeper” league, so the Rams don’t have to draft Gurley again. They already have him.
Zooey
ModeratorSeems like it’ll be the Raiders.
Sure looks like Spanos would be better off
in San DiegoRams and Raiders — room-mates.
Gee, i wonder which one will
be the messy one.w
vI don’t know. Maybe. From the $$ point of view – which apparently is all that matters to anybody – it depends on how much of the revenue stream he gets from either facility. I mean…TV and merchandising are socialized, so the money difference comes from other streams of revenue: parking, advertising in the stadium, and so on. I imagine in LA, Spanos will get a bit more in ticket revenue. Hard to say in advertising, but let’s say he will make a tick more in advertising in LA. All the other stuff is in the details of the negotiation with SK. Parking etc. Problem for Spanos is that he doesn’t have a concrete proposal from San Diego to compare to Stan’s offer.
And I don’t know how nice Stan is going to be. Nobody knows what pressure is put on him from the league. As far as we know, they aren’t telling him he has to share revenue from the stadium naming rights, for example. All we know is that they created an incentive for him to make a deal in order for him to open up the money sluices sooner. If he can hold out for that income until February 2017, there is no reason for him to make much of an offer to the Chargers or Raiders. AFAIK, Stan can find the most expensive lease terms in the league, increase it by 50%, and tell them he owns the parking lot, and so they can have their ticket sales and game day advertising revenue. Everything else is his because he’s paying for all of it. That might not be attractive to Spanos. But it may be a much better deal than that. Who knows?
Zooey
ModeratorWhile it seems counter intuitive for the Chargers to move in with the Rams knowing that Mark Davis is ready to pounce on their former market, there are also rumors that there is no shortage of investors who are willing to go in with Spanos to split the megatropolis that is the new stadium in LA. They believe that they are going to be printing money, and if that is the case who cares if you have no real fan base? Vinnie B also believes that if Spanos declines, the Raiders absolutely would move to LA. Thus, the Rams will almost certainly be sharing with someone.
The moratorium on beginning their marketing initiatives is kind of a big deal for the Rams, too. We have heard that they will be heavily into promoting the Rams here in Southern California, but none of that can begin until the second team is situated. So while there is a buzz in Southern California about the NFL returning to LA, until they can really start to promote the team there may be a dead period after the initial excitement. By the way, the web site goes online in an hour to put your name on the waitlist for tix. I am going to be the first person on the list! : )
Isiah 58I don’t understand much of what you said there. I agree that the Rams will be sharing that stadium with either the Chargers or Raiders. A tenant seems inevitable.
I don’t understand “there is no shortage of investors who are willing to go in with Spanos to split the megatropolis that is the new stadium in LA.” AFAIK, ownership of the stadium and the surrounds is not on the table. The 2nd team is going to be a tenant, not a landlord. No? The money printing presses are owned by SK and his Hollywood Park partnership – forgotten its name.
Also – the moratorium is on selling PSLs, suites, and naming rights to the stadium – not on marketing. AFAIK. I haven’t seen anything saying they can’t promote the Rams. I mean – they already have with their public press conference and new logo and the ticket sales that you are signing up for this morning.
Zooey
ModeratorThere is KABC 790. They used to be the Dodgers flagship a long time ago, and now they are the Kings flagship. They undoubtedly will have sports talk in their lineup.
January 18, 2016 at 11:45 am in reply to: LA Times starts Rams coverage + LA press conferences #37608Zooey
ModeratorAlso being widely discussed is the possibility that if the Chargers move in with the Rams the Raiders will then move to San Diego. One problem: Chargers fans HATE the Raiders and I can’t see any of them converting into Raider fans. Charger fans will drive up to Inglewood to cheer on the L.A. Chargers before they will ever support the San Diego Raiders (which doesn’t sound right at all). True, there are a lot of Raider fans in the L.A. area who would drive down to attend games in San Diego, but…really? 95% of San Diego football fans are Charger fans who, I repeat, HATE the Raiders. I can’t imagine how you can have a “home team” that is utterly despised by the “home fans”.
That kind of strikes me as obvious now that he says it. I never thought of that.
Zooey
ModeratorHate all of this.
I don’t understand how the Raiders could go to San Diego if the stadium sucks just as much as the oakland stadium, than why would they move there?
Because San Diego is at least moving whereas the city of Oakland is doing nothing. There is a willingness to build a new stadium in San Diego. There is something on the ballot. IIRC, the problem for Spanos was location. He wanted a stadium in the heart of the city, and San Diego is proposing something near where the Padres play which, I gather, is more peripheral to the city. I dunno, though, because all I know about the San Diego situation is what I picked up by reading about the Rams’ situation.
As for the Raiders, they have the worst situation there is in the NFL, and no money of their own to address it. But they don’t have any concrete prospects to consider yet, just generalities. They kind of have to wait until Spanos makes his decision before their choices clarify.
Zooey
ModeratorThe networks want an AFC team in LA.
I don’t think it’s an “if” question, but a “when” question.
Zooey
ModeratorThis new Konk-adium project. The one
where all the pictures and do-dads
impressed the owners and convinced them
to screw ole Spanos — well, I’ve seen the Pictures.And nowhere do i see a big curved Horn.
Just seems like they coulda incorporated
a big ole Horn,
spinning off the roof or a big ole horn sculpture.
Ya know.If yer gonna spend a hundred billion dollars,
you’d think there’d be a horn.George Lucas woulda had a horn.
w
vI believe he left it behind, up the ass of St. Louis.
Zooey
ModeratorApparently there is some incentive for Stan by having a second team–with advertisers or some such thing, can’t remember what I read.
It has to do with PSL sales. I forget the details but they’re findable.
From and article in the LA Times by Sam Farmer:
To encourage the Rams to make a deal with a second team, the resolution barred the Rams from selling personal seat licenses, suites or naming rights until February 2017 unless another NFL team joins them before then.
The advantage, of course, of selling PSLs and naming rights immediately is that Stan can write the checks for building the stadium with other people’s money. Without that, he is going to have to get loans or liquidate his own stuff for the first year of construction.
Zooey
ModeratorWell, i’m not sure i understand humans.
Why would humans ‘want’ to live in LA ?
The smog? The traffic? The murder rate?
The earth quakes?w
v
“New York is something awful, something monstrous.
I like to walk the streets, lost, but I recognize that New York is the world’s greatest lie. New York is Senegal with machines.”
Federico G LorcaWhat?
No matter where you are in LA, you are within a mile of a drive through burger place, a shopping mall, and a cineplex. And drive time is less than an hour.
Zooey
Moderatorhe’s better off staying in san diego just to keep another team from moving in. he’ll then have the san diego market as well as part of the orange county market. he’d be dumb to move in with stan.
I tend to agree that having the Raiders take over San Diego is worse for him than having the Raiders in LA. It would be all uphill in LA to get a fan base. In fact, some of the LA residents who have remained Raiders fans would probably stick with the Raiders, especially if they move to San Diego.
But he needs a deal before he locks himself into San Diego, and that could be tough to pull off. I bet he is going to buy himself time to try to do just that, and he won’t move to LA for 2016.
Zooey
ModeratorIt’ll end up going down to the wire,
i would think.Frankly, I think I like the Seahawks
more than the Panthers.Wouldnt mind seeing Ariz vs Seattle.
w
vOnly if that wire is a garrote.
I was kind of hoping to see AZ against Seattle, but that isn’t happening, so I’m just going to sit back and enjoy the evisceration of the Seahawks.
Zooey
ModeratorYeah, Spanos knew he would be the Clippers or Mets or Jets if he shared LA with the Rams. That was the whole point of hooking up with another team and trying to keep the Rams out. It isn’t that he liked the Carson project better; it’s that he didn’t want the Rams in LA at all.
So now he is in a tough spot. He doesn’t want the Raiders in San Diego, but he doesn’t want the Raiders in LA, either. He’s screwed. He now has to decide if he is better off as the unwanted kid brother in Stanland, and possibly losing a good chunk of his San Diego fan base to the San Diego Raiders, or paint himself in a corner in San Diego while yielding ALL of LA to other teams. He has one year to either get a signed and sealed deal with San Diego, or he is really, really screwed. He has to figure that whatever market he leaves open is going to be filled by the Raiders. Unless he’s lucky.
But the Raiders currently have nothing brewing in Oakland, and I’m pretty sure the Cowboys and Texans both have fans in San Antonio and all of western Texas that they don’t really want to hand over to the Raiders. The Raiders would have to apply for relocation to San Antonio, and they might get approval, and they might not. They probably would, but there is no certainty. It’s much easier for the Raiders to move to LA, and they already have a fan base there, and it wouldn’t require giving up as big a chunk of equity in the team as moving to San Antonio likely would.
So I think Spano has to choose between LA and SD with the assumption that the Raiders take the other spot.
It sucks to be Spanos right now.
Zooey
ModeratorWell they need a qb, and either Mannion is that guy or they need to get one.
That’s the reality. And it’s a bit frightening. Because Mannion may not be that guy. And even if he is, he may not be ready next year.
Zooey
ModeratorYeah I do think this has been in the plans for a long time. And knowing what he knew may even have played into Fisher’s decision to come to the Rams for all we know. Of course he’ll never say that but I do wonder.
Fisher has roots in LA.
We knew at the time of the interview that the conversation took place. The only thing we didn’t know for sure was what was said i.e. was Fisher willing to go through that again, or did SK promise they weren’t moving. Well, pretty obviously, Fisher knew Kroenke’s intention, and Kroenke knew Fisher was on board. So, yeah, Fisher is not only safe this year, he is safe probably up to the opening of the new stadium. At least.
Now. We need somebody with connections in the real estate business to find out if Jenkins, Johnson, McLeod et al are shopping for houses in the LA area.
Cuz I’m gonna guess that now is a real good time to pack up and resettle for everybody.
Welcome to LA. The first thing you are going to experience is Sticker Shock.
January 17, 2016 at 12:42 pm in reply to: 12 former Rams to coach Stub Hubb Collegiate bowl Jan 23rd. #37535Zooey
ModeratorLarry Brooks? Haven’t heard that name in
while.w
vMost underrated DT in league history. John Hannah called him the best DT he ever faced.
Yeah. Well, practically every single player on that defense was a pro bowler.
Lessee if I can do a lineup from memory:
Jack Youngblood
Merlin Olsen
Larry Brooks
Fred Dryer
Isiah Robertson
Jack Reynolds
Jim Youngblood/Carl Ekern ???
Rod Perry
Pat Thomas
Bill Simpson
Dave ElmendorfThere was Brudzinski and Cromwell, too, but I’m not sure who all was on the roster at the same time.
Anyway. Boy. Those were some good defensive years. Tough to stand out when you’re surrounded by teammates like that.
Zooey
ModeratorGrits, Grits, Grits. I heard you’ve been banned from so many places, I was beginning to worry you had been banned from the 21st century altogether.
QB, DE, and (gawd help me), a TE.
Now, where the heck is RFL? We haven’t heard from him in all this.
Zooey
ModeratorNot much on the internet from that time.
Well, that’s a lot more than I was able to find. The only thing I found was a sentence in an unverifiable website that said that the NFL was worried that the first St. Louis ownership group would possibly sue this second group. I’d say this article substantiates the claim you heard. Looks like they didn’t get the deal done in time for the NFL, and they went with more secure bids elsewhere.
Zooey
ModeratorAll of which I take as saying they basically ignored their own relocation guidelines and more or less just jerked St. Louis around on the stadium stuff.
Certainly. Yes. Exactly.
I remember the discussion of relocation guidelines coming up a year ago. I don’t think there were many voices who thought those guidelines would be binding. Pretty much everyone thought the NFL would do whatever it wanted regardless.
Zooey
ModeratorI heard this on the radio. kroenke was the reason St. Louis didn’t get an expansion team. He wouldn’t pay the guy who had the stadium lease what he wanted. StL stalls and the Jags are born. I am not sure who was right. But that was bad on somebody. All I remembered was StL blew it.
That’s interesting.
That could be true only if Kroenke had exclusive rights to own the expansion team, or exclusive rights to negotiate the stadium lease. And I can’t see either one of those things being factual.
So I am going to say No Sale on that one. I don’t believe it.
You are not obliged to believe anything.
Well. I’m PREPARED to believe it. But it doesn’t make sense as it stands. Can you explain how Kroenke was the person upon whom depended expansion in St. Louis? Did he win some kind of exclusive bid to own the expansion team?
Zooey
ModeratorI think people who are hoping to see SK damaged by financial overreach are deluding themselves. This development is going to be thousands of money-generating units that it will be staggering. I bet that if the Rams play in front of a half-empty stadium every week, Stan will still be in the black. There are residential units, business suites, Hotel suites, retail and restaurant suites, a theatre, and goodness knows, all writing rent/lease checks to SK every month for the rest of eternity. Plus Super Bowls, Final Fours, Olympics, World Cup, geezus the cash will flow like a river in the rainy season. The fortunes of the Rams are almost irrelevant. This is an Empire.
-
AuthorPosts