Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 6,151 through 6,180 (of 7,927 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58642
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Steve Bannon actively sought to be make Breitbart the platform of the alt-right, the white nationalist movement.

    He’s the antithesis of William F Buckley who used his intellect to drive back the Birchers and make the case successfully that anti-semitism had no place in the Republican party nor American discourse.

    Why do we call them the alt-right? They’re nazis. We can call them nazis. It’s okay. Nazis are really hard to offend. I guess a different term will help historians keep their eras straight, and avoid confusion.

    William F. Buckley. I used to hate that guy. He used to be the worst of the Republican party. Right now, I can’t think of a single Republican I would prefer to William F. Buckley.

    This country has tacked so far to the right that it is arguable we have a fascist government starting in January. Heck, it’s arguable it became fascist long ago. I will have to pull out my handy Cheat Sheet on the 14 characteristics of fascism, if I can find it.

    But to think…William F. Buckley seems reasonable by today’s standards.

    OMG.

    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58593
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, and if these assholes actually pass a Muslim registry, I think we should ALL register and render it moot.

    There’s a big movement for that. If there’s a Muslim registry, non-Muslims should register. Choke the machine.

    There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet.

    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58577
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, i agree.

    But will the Dem-Machine EVER allow a true progressive to be at the head of the Ticket?

    Whens the last time that happened? 1972? McGovern?

    w
    v

    Let’s see who emerges as DNC chair.

    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58530
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have waited a week to see what Taibbi would say.

    And I don’t know what that was.

    Kind of like watching somebody scratch his head, and wonder. And both take credit for seeing things, and take blame for not seeing things. And leaving us without a handle.

    Okay.

    Yeah–what I got out of it is that no one saw this coming in any real way and now that it has–they are all shocked. To his credit, Taibbi is a very good journalist who does a great job of covering subjects. I think he’s genuinely stunned at how much he and others missed here. It’s almost a self- autopsy of the whole thing. But what he doesn’t discuss is the role the media played in building Trump. They fed off Trump this year, for ratings, for sales articles, etc. Trump meant profit. That’s a subject that interests me that I hope he writes about some day.

    I have faith in Taibbi, even though that wasn’t a very good article.

    But he will have a perspective on it later that will add dimension, I think.

    He is still processing, and the deadline got there before he finished thinking. That’s okay.

    I dunno.

    To me, Trump tapped into something very real. Both he and Bernie tapped into the sense of disenfranchisement that many working Americans feel. Bernie was more intellectual about it, whereas Trump was more emotional about it. They were both describing the same problem, but from different angles.

    And Bernie got muscled out of the picture. So there was only Trump’s appeal left to stand against Hillary’s algorithmic posturing that addressed sound bite issues instead of what many Americans see and feel is wrong.

    And, yeah, he’s disgusting personally in many ways, and unreliable, and contradictory, and just plain dicktory. But as erratic as he is, he at least spoke to something closer to the truth than Hillary did. Hillary in her shitty pantsuits, trying to crack prepared “zingers.” In the end, she got more votes, but in the wrong places. She lost in what should have been Democrat heartland. But her husband sold those people out, and she never recognized it, or admitted it if she did.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58524
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    As I recall every time we have seen Fisher make a qb change, he said just after the benched qb’s last game “we’re not changing qbs.”

    Yeah, on the radio today a couple of guys were talking and said that Fisher said Keenum was the guy still on Monday, but on Tuesday morning, he sudden tells Keenum and Goff that it’s Goff, so Stan or Les must’ve got to him, or job pressure, or something.

    Noooo.

    Fisher says whatever he has to say to the press, and runs his business indoors. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn later that this date was targeted during the bye week. But you don’t say anything to Keenum, and you don’t say anything to Goff, and you certainly don’t say anything to the press until you’ve told both Keenum and Goff. That’s just basic. And you don’t tell Keenum and Goff until the beginning of the work week. Any other course would be foolish, imo.

    in reply to: Taibbi on Trump #58505
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have waited a week to see what Taibbi would say.

    And I don’t know what that was.

    Kind of like watching somebody scratch his head, and wonder. And both take credit for seeing things, and take blame for not seeing things. And leaving us without a handle.

    Okay.

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58503
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Those are the people making the videos.

    And the shock value of those videos is fantastic, I imagine. (I haven’t watched a single one, of anything, ever).

    Nobody wants that.

    They are about as relevant as the people who carry guts around in Times Square yelling about baby seals.

    So they aren’t interested in a peaceful solution. Neither is PETA.

    If we were to address the problems of the vast majority of people who mostly just want to be left alone, in peace, the support for ISIS will plummet.

    But I think we agree they also ought to go get the bastards at the top. I am all for the policing aspect of this. Get the key people. But if you can’t somehow restore hope for the nations of Syria, and Libya, and Iraq somehow, new leaders will take their place. And you just can’t kill everybody.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58500
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I suddenly cannot wait for this game. Against. Somebody. Miami, yeah.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58499
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    There are a lot of theories out there, but the one that makes the most sense to me is the one Fisher has been saying publicly, more or less. He wanted Goff to be ready. He wasn’t ready.

    And, sure, he told everyone Sunday and Monday there was no change, but any coach worth a nickle would say that. He wanted to talk to Keenum privately first, and Goff. Only an asshole would say to the media that he was switching QBs before he talked to the QBs. I wouldn’t be surprised if they thought Goff was ready before NY, and decided it was better to start him at home, and just waited for this moment. This idea that Stan or the fans or Les “got” to him, or he panicked and reversed course, or whatever, just is ridiculous. I think. This guy has coached for over two decades, and played in the spotlight since he was a kid. He knows the difference between the locker room and the media. I just do not buy any of these conspiracy theories at all.

    Fisher is starting Goff next week for one reason: he thinks Goff is ready to start.

    The rest of the chatter is manure.

    IMO.

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58492
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I know Bin Laden’s reasoning. But we were cool when we armed Mujahideen groups to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. So we’re only evil when we’re not serving their interests.

    Which serves my point. It isn’t religion we are fighting. Our struggle is only a “holy war” in the press. In real life, it is political. Religion has little to do with it. We get along with Muslims just fine when our political interests align, and butt heads when they don’t. Go figure. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Turkey, Indonesia…they all do what we want, and we do what they want. No religious conflict there… Somehow “religious” conflict only happens with Muslim nations we have conflicting political interests with.

    3. US support of Israel and its illegal occupation and suppression in Palestinian areas.

    Ironic. Non-support of Israel by the United States would likely lead to an escalation of settlement building in the region and over the green line. We’re actually keeping them in check with our diplomatic influence and military aid.

    That could be. I don’t know. But at the same time, our financial and military subsidization of them allows them to continue doing it. We have Israel by the balls, but we never squeeze them to encourage a two state solution, or any other solution.

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58485
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    And I will just throw in…another way to fend them off is to stop abusing them with our foreign policies. Ya know. Invading Iraq was not really necessary.

    True, but their hatred of Christianity and Zionism, predates the Iraq war. They tried to bring down the WTT during the Clinton Administration, too, as you’re fully aware. But that aside, and as I’m also sure you’re fully aware, global-jihadism is a goal resulting from a distortion of their religion and a literal interpretation of the Qur’an. They take the worst parts of the Qur’an and distort them to interpret anyone who doesn’t worship Allah should be murdered – in a heinous manner. It would be like Christian fundamentalists using the Old Testament as their guiding principles (you know, like they used to).

    I agree with you that we should stop meddling in their business, but we’re way beyond diplomacy, and it’s far too late to remove ourselves from involvement. This is a global movement that targets multiple Nations, and with one objective. A Caliphate. Without delving too far into our ‘true’ objective of installing democracy in the middle east, it would be negligent to leave them alone now. Allowing that perversion of a religion to metastasize will further reap consequences we can ill afford.

    Do you know what bin Laden said his reasons were?

    1. US troops stationed in the Holy Land (i.e. Saudi Arabia)
    2. US support for dictatorships (i.e. Saudi Arabia)
    3. US support of Israel and its illegal occupation and suppression in Palestinian areas.

    That’s it.

    No mention of Allah’s command to eradicate infidels.

    It is POLITICS, not religion, that motivates ISIS. Yes, some people are easily co-opted into the movement on the basis of their religious beliefs, but most of them are motivated by politics.

    I mean…Sweden and Switzerland and Portugal are largely Christian. But they aren’t attacking them. They are attacking countries that have tentacles reaching into their lives right now.

    The Caliphate rhetoric isn’t a thing. The vast majority of Muslims are not on board with that, let alone anybody else.

    There are 1.2 billion Muslims today. 0.00008% of them are in ISIS (100,000).

    in reply to: Anti-Trump protests ARE peaceful and organic. #58479
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    ————-
    True, zooey.

    But i still am skeptical about the breezy view that Sanders “would have won”. Maybe.
    But i dunno. America does not seem like a nation that would elect a socialist to me.

    Granted, Bernie ran as an FDR progressive.

    I dunno. I think it woulda been REAL close.

    w
    v

    He woulda won by at least a touchdown.

    How come you is so poor when you is an attorney? I thought you guys all wore Armani and drove BMWs.

    in reply to: Spoiled Americans want to flee what they created #58468
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t know the answers to any of those questions.

    I do know that dozens of countries are doing it successfully.

    Let’s go there and ask those questions.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58459
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    OK…looks like we’re gonna find out. Doesn’t matter to me anyway cause I’m more interested to see if he can help the team.

    Don’t argue with me, you Tavon sniffer.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58457
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    You can’t help but use electricity metaphors, can ya? Gives you away every time.

    Now’s the time to start Goff if you think there’s a chance he could turn things around because they are only a game out of the last wildcard spot.

    I don’t for a second think the Rams are legitimate playoff contenders and Jeff Fisher probably doesn’t either. They certainly aren’t with Keenum at QB. But Gurley showed some life against the Jets so if you want to find out if there is a playoff run in this team now’s the time to make the switch.

    The Rams defense is good. The Rams are 2-1 when they have scored fewer than 10 points. The rest of the league is 0-14-2 when scoring less than 10.

    If the Rams can increase their scoring by 5 points a game, they can make the playoffs.

    And lose.

    But they could make it.

    So…what will they draft? OL? WR? Long snapper?

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58455
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have read this several places, and I don’t agree.

    Well…I don’t agree with the concept either…but to disagree that it’s gonna happen is just a little naive.

    I read too many threads daily that no matter what they do it’s wrong…so, I already see the blood in the water.

    Doesn’t bother me one bit because I firmly believe Goff wasn’t ready to start the season and even if he has a bit of a rough go of it, it won’t convince me he’s a bust…hell I don’t think GRob;s a bust even if he doesn’t work out at LT and I haven’t written that off yet.

    I am not saying it won’t happen (i.e. if Goff does well, people will complain that Fisher didn’t start him earlier). I am only saying that criticism will soon be dropped because people will get excited by the Rams winning, and will soon forget to blame the coach for the fact they had to wait.

    in reply to: Spoiled Americans want to flee what they created #58454
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The thing on health care is that there are many, many countries with variations on the same thing. I think the key ingredient is basically the government is the insurance company. And we cut out the middle man. Aetna, Humana, Whoever…none of them actually deliver health care. They take your premiums, and then they reimburse health care providers for their services while keeping a cut for themselves. They are delivery boys for your money.

    So the government acts as a non-profit insurance company. Then there is only one payer, and all the hospitals, doctors, etc. have only one set of rules and forms to fill out for compensation instead of dozens of companies to deal with, each with different rules and so on, and it streamlines the whole thing. Plus eliminates a bunch of advertising expenses (those geese in the commercials are expensive!), expense accounts, and CEO bonuses etc. It’s cheaper. Studies show that health care would cost 1/3 less than it does now, and…EVERYBODY would be covered.

    So I dunno what the taxes would be. But whatever the taxes are, you wouldn’t be paying premiums. And right now, 1/3 of our premiums go to overhead whereas Medicare operates at about 7% overhead iirc. (Understand these numbers are ballpark). Our premiums also include the hidden costs of paying for ER visits by people without insurance. ER visits are MUCH more expensive, and those costs get past on to the consumers. So we are paying for the uninsured anyway as it is.

    I heard a guy on the radio the other day talking about how the repeal of ACA would affect him, and he told about how crappy he had felt for a couple of years, and then he signed up for ACA, saw a doctor, and found out he has diabetes. He got treated, and feels better. He said if he loses ACA coverage, he will hold out as best he can, but he can’t afford the medication, and he would eventually end up in the ER where we will all pick up the tab anyway. And he will probably die sooner, and leave his family without his income which will make them dependent.

    I once saw most of a documentary somewhere that visited 5 different countries – Taiwan, Germany, Japan, and 2 others that I missed – and looked at how they structure health care. Quite different approaches to it. All with better results than what we get, at lower overall costs. I can’t quite understand why we wouldn’t send some people out to study a bunch of these different systems, come back, and piece together some kind of proposal that would make sense in America. There are a lot of successful programs out there.

    The devil is in the details, of course, but there are a LOT of countries doing better with health care than we are by any empirical measurement.

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58449
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    <
    Fair enough. And maybe I was being over-sensitive, because I’ve been defending my choices and my POV for a few days, across multiple platforms, and to all kinds of people (in person). I have a lot of respect for you, Mackey Mack, and for everyone on this board, quite honestly. You’re all very smart and scholarly. Like wv said, it’s difficult to keep our animosities in check when discussing politics, but I had/have high hopes for this board in particular to do just that. So, going forward, I’ll try not to read ‘tone’ into the discussion, and I’ll do my best to elucidate in the same manner.

    Re: Destroying Islamic terrorists once and for all:
    That’s a nonsensical statement. That’s like saying you’d like to destroy racism once and for all.

    It’s not nonsensical, and that’s a poor comparison. While racism and islamic fundamentalism are both ideologies, one of them (terrorism) is a movement that can be squashed by taking it apart from the top down. Not unlike Naziism. Instead of allowing them to grow and flourish, I’d like to see our tremendous military might, led by brilliant military strategists and Generals, and along with a coalition of States, systematically destroy their leadership and quickly put splinter cells into graves. I have a unique perspective on this, because I’ve seen hundreds of murders on LiveLeak, and I read about the atrocities they commit all the time. I seek it out. It’s on the same level as gassing the Jews, but with less mercy. They murder gays, they murder jews, they murder Christians, they stone women to death, they use children as human grenades, and they use human beings as shields. If you don’t think we have the power to assert our will against them, then okay. But doing nothing – or not enough – is akin to sponsoring their actions. Again, just like the Nazi’s, we need to destroy this movement before it grows. And we need to keep putting that flame out every single time it tries to reignite.

    We all step on each others toes once in a while. It’s what happens when people have opinions, and in the case of politics, the only people interested in them are people who have them bound up strongly in their identity, their sense of values and morality. So. I personally wish the edit feature was available longer, and that we had a delete option. One of the boards we had once-upon-a-time allowed deletions. But here, once you said it, you have to live with the consequences. So sometimes we get pissy with each other.

    On terrorism, this is from the Global Terrorism Index of 2014

    This chart shows how 268 terrorist groups ended from 1968 – 2006.

    Politicisation means that the terrorist group was somehow brought into the political system, its leaders getting seats in government etc.

    Policing is the targeting (arresting or killing) of key leaders in the group.

    In 10% of cases, the terrorists achieved their goals.

    In 7% of cases, military action finished them off.

    And I will just throw in…another way to fend them off is to stop abusing them with our foreign policies. Ya know. Invading Iraq was not really necessary.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58441
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Who says that Goff can’t be a spark to the offense? Maybe Goff goes on a huge win streak, and shocks the world and upsets the Patriots and Seahawks in their places? We can hope. Just saying.

    Nobody says he can’t spark the offense.

    But even Dr. Frankenstein needed a bolt of lightning to bring life to his offense.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58432
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Fisher can’t win here. If Goff sucks, fans will be jumping off the top of the stadium. If he’s great, they will want Fisher’s head for waiting so long to start him.

    That’s a fact…it’s a lose-lose for Fisher.

    I will say, it’s probably a good idea he is starting Goff because I think the fans in Cali would be brutal to CK from the first possession and they MTL will be a little more forgiving to Goff…for a while at least.

    I have read this several places, and I don’t agree.

    If Goff does well, people will be excited that Goff is doing well. There may be some criticism of Fisher for one news cycle, but people will soon forget the whole thing. And, if I’m Fisher, I will live pretty damn happily with that criticism anyway. So to hell with that.

    Meanwhile, there will be voices countering those, arguing that it proves Fisher was right. Because Goff WASN’T ready. He wasn’t. If he is now, that only goes to prove Fisher did the right thing, doesn’t it? In the long run, everybody forgets it.

    No, the only thing to fear is Goff sucking.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58421
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, yay.

    Something had to give. I mean, whats the worst thing that could happen, the Rams dont score any touchdowns, and only manage a few field goals for 60 minutes??? God forbid we sink to a despairingly low level like that.

    The worst that could happen is that he makes brutal mistakes that lead to headlines all over the place calling him a bust, and talking heads arrogantly piling on, and killing him and Fisher.

    in reply to: Goff will start Sunday vs Miami; Adam Schefter #58419
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/no-1-pick-jared-goff-to-finally-start-for-the-rams-according-to-a-report/

    Being 4-5 and coming off a 9-6 victory is as good a time as any to make a drastic change, so Jeff Fisher and the Rams are turning to rookie Jared Goff, according to a report from Chris Mortensen of ESPN.

    Goff, taken No. 1 overall in the 2016 NFL Draft, has yet to attempt a regular-season throw for the Rams. Case Keenum started the first nine games for Los Angeles.

    The rookie will get to begin his career in front of the home crowd — probably a pretty reasonable part of the equation to starting Keenum last week in New York — against the Miami Dolphins on Sunday.

    In terms of the timing for this start, things are a little weird. Many people believed Goff should have started out of the gates, and the play of Keenum pretty much justified that for several parts of the season.

    Keenum’s game-ending interception in London against the Giants was horrific. Los Angeles has managed to score more than 20 points just twice this season.

    Maybe Goff wasn’t ready to operate the offense, because of his transition from Sonny Dykes’ “Bear Raid” offense to whatever it is that the Rams run.

    It’s hard to imagine that moving to a rookie quarterback, even one with 10 weeks of learning and nine weeks of clipboard holding, is going to magically transform the Rams offense. In other words, this doesn’t look like Los Angeles making some bold playoff push by going with the youngster.

    The Rams were in limbo at 4-5, clearly not dangerous enough to really make a playoff run and clearly limited by their quarterback. Seeing what Goff can do and getting him live reps in games for the stretch run makes sense.

    Pressure from outside was even more intense for Goff, because of the success of Carson Wentz with the Eagles (No. 2 overall) and Dak Prescott of the Cowboys (fourth-round) so far this season. Even the Browns have gotten an extended look at Cody Kessler in the regular season.

    It’s hard to imagine Goff causes them to crater and miss the postseason. Maybe he’s better. If that’s the case, then suddenly he gets some momentum headed into his second year.

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58413
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Spoiled Americans want to flee what they created #58404
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    “I wanna live in a country which has more community oriented values (i.e. socialized medicine, maternity leave, retirement, vacation time…egalitarian quality of life), and this country just isn’t going to be that place.”

    Well you can pine for your pie in the sky, “imagine all the people” utopia all you want, but aside from all the other developed democracies in the world, no such place exists.

    It amazes me – when I bother to think about it – how Americans, who want to be #1 at everything in the world, ignore clearly superior ways of organizing society in the name of the myth of individuality and the belief that “government screws everything up.”

    We pay far, far more for health care than ANY country with national health care, and get worse results: worse infant mortality, shorter lifespans, people going bankrupt because of illness or accident, and on and on. And we won’t change it. We fight against it. Fight against making the system better AND cheaper. Because we simply won’t believe it. Won’t believe the facts right in front of us that dozens of countries have had national health care for 60 years with better results.

    Paid vacation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minimum_annual_leave_by_country

    Yes. We are behind Albania, Nepal, Afghanistan…. The richest country in the world cannot afford to guarantee paid vacation.

    Parent leave? Forget it.

    One of the greatest outcomes of the propaganda system in this country is that the richest people have convinced the poorest people that pursuing their own interests is disastrous.

    How many Trump supporters believe unions are bad in principle? How many oppose universal health care? How many think paid vacation is an outrageous idea that would bankrupt businesses, or make them flee? How many believe that increasing the minimum wage is bad?

    And they wonder why their economic circumstances suck. All the money is going up, but they elected a guy who is going to cut taxes for the wealthy so that even MORE of the money goes up. Because wealth disparity wasn’t bad enough.

    in reply to: Spoiled Americans want to flee what they created #58381
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well except I don’t think that the people claiming they want to leave are the minorities.

    I don’t think they are either, nor do I believe the number of people who actually leave is going to be a significant number, and I bet a lot of those who do leave have additional motives thrown into their decision in addition to disaffection with this election. But that is all 100% speculation. I doubt there is any real data on this, so it’s all guesswork and assumptions, probably.

    However, I do sympathize with a perspective that just says, “Eff it. The entire political climate here is regressive, and the systemic pressures from money and the media discourage me to the point that I just don’t see any way that the values I hold are ever going to get a shot at emerging in this culture. I wanna live in a country which has more community oriented values (i.e. socialized medicine, maternity leave, retirement, vacation time…egalitarian quality of life), and this country just isn’t going to be that place. I want a better place for my family, and this degraded political circus is not part of my Quality World.”

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58377
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Civilized? Really? Vandalism and assaults are civilized? Now a Cry In is civilized. It’s also pathetic.

    You haven’t complained about police assaults on unarmed black people.

    You haven’t complained about Trump supporters assaulting protesters.

    You haven’t complained about racist graffiti (vandalism) that has emerged all over this country. You minimize it. You point the finger somewhere else.

    Then you complain about the anti-Trump side protesting.

    This is why your credibility is low. You are not, in principle, against assault. If your side does it, it simply isn’t assault. Or it’s the fault of the victim. Or whatever.

    Killory’s people were coordinating fomenting violence at Trump rallies. As for credibility it is yours that is low. A grown man claiming Trump will be the end to the biosphere! Get a grip on reality.

    Yeah. Well. I will just stick with the children at NASA http://climate.nasa.gov/ over your adult perspective. Thanks, though.

    in reply to: Robert Reich: The Democratic Party Needs To Clean House #58372
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Civilized? Really? Vandalism and assaults are civilized? Now a Cry In is civilized. It’s also pathetic.

    You haven’t complained about police assaults on unarmed black people.

    You haven’t complained about Trump supporters assaulting protesters.

    You haven’t complained about racist graffiti (vandalism) that has emerged all over this country. You minimize it. You point the finger somewhere else.

    Then you complain about the anti-Trump side protesting.

    This is why your credibility is low. You are not, in principle, against assault. If your side does it, it simply isn’t assault. Or it’s the fault of the victim. Or whatever.

    in reply to: Statement from the Rams on Robert Quinn #58363
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Rumor is seizures.

    Remember he had a brain tumor.

    in reply to: Spoiled Americans want to flee what they created #58350
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Okay. But once it reaches that level, it will be too late for many of them. By definition, once you are a persecuted minority, you are already persecuted. And for some of them, that will be devastating.

    It may be better to stand with allies and reclaim the place, but some people feel it is better to leave than be arrested or killed. And I don’t blame them.

    In Weisel’s case, the first warning was that foreign Jews were deported.
    Then a Fascist government comes to power in Budapest.
    Then Jewish leaders were arrested.
    Then there was a 3-day curfew for Jews.
    Next, authorities seized their assets.
    Then, 3 days later, the yellow star.
    Then came ghettos.
    Then…

    So, tell me, when would you have left?

    And remember, it wasn’t just “ethnic minorities.” As I recall, communists, socialists, and labor union leaders were among the first to be rounded up. And Habeas Corpus has already been effectively suspended for years.

    I am actually interested in your response to this because the thought of leaving has crossed my mind. Mostly like a lot of thoughts I have that blow through my mind like autumn leaves, but I have thought of it.

    Habeas Corpus is already gone. Without a peep, btw. Mind-blowing. A 800-year old “take it for granted” right reaching back to the Magna Carta was wiped away without a murmur, and not even the Warrens and Sanders mention it.

    We have a president who has openly admired authoritarians, expressed hostilities towards groups that he has offered as scapegoats, turned his back on them as his supporters harass them, and has promised to spy on mosques, and get busy deporting people. He has talked about the desirability of limiting the press (this is a press that is largely a PR firm for government as it is). We have a heavily militarized police force, and I don’t think the new government is entering with the slogan Black Lives Matter.

    A report came out today that says hate crimes are up 7% this year, and Trump isn’t even in office yet. And we have all seen the outpouring of ugliness since election day.

    And to that the fact that 1/2 the people in this country sat out the election, and choose to just not get involved in anything, and 1/4 of people who actively support this turn in the tide, and live in denial that anything is wrong with it.

    Even in the ghettos, the Jews had their own “government” and police force, and they stood together as allies. “We can bear this. It’s not so bad. It will pass eventually.”

    They even got on the trains to move to “another ghetto,” leaving everything behind them.

    Now, I don’t think we are headed to concentration camps.

    But…you know…things can get very bad for people. I would lay money we are going to see beatings and worse of Latinos and Muslims increase in 2017.

    This isn’t leaving the country because they got a president they don’t like.

    When would you have left?

    in reply to: Anti-Trump protests ARE peaceful and organic. #58348
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    and that’s not to say there isn’t an element of racism among trump supporters. there is. it certainly plays a significant part. misogyny and homophobia. there’s that too.

    but i also don’t like how clinton minimized other issues and reduced it down to vote for us or side with racism and misogyny and homophobia.

    bernie would not have done that. i truly believe that.

    There was a great article during the primaries that was posted here that argued that Dems should nominate Sanders precisely because of this. Because against Hillary, Trump would go low, and she couldn’t leave the “Crooked Hillary” stuff alone, and would have to go low back at him, and that she would inevitably lose a mud-slinging contest. Whereas Sanders would have just kept banging away on wealth, health care, and college education. He would have no need to go to the gutter, and Trump would just look bad in contrast. That was the argument.

Viewing 30 posts - 6,151 through 6,180 (of 7,927 total)