Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 3,451 through 3,480 (of 7,931 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Goff: the December thread #125403
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Love the bonus Johnson interception from the Championship game.

    in reply to: tweets Rams … 12/7 thru 12/9 #125384
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Looking at the playoffs the Rams do have some guys who can give us better play than we’ve seen. In other words we can gain explosiveness with better backfield play (both Akers and Hendy) and at WR3 (Jefferson). And our OL has actually been solid so it’s not out of the realm of reason to think that our two young RBs who have good explosiveness can boost this offense IF we get more consistency out of them

    There is a drop-off at RB from a healthy Gurley. There just is. Gurley would have been a HOFer if he had knees. I think they can get good production, and good ENOUGH production from Akers/Henderson, but there is a drop-off. Don’t know if it’s from 3 to 17, but there is a drop-off.

    At WR, I think they miss Cooks’ ability to go deep, but again…not a steep drop-off there. It’s not like the Rams receivers are slow. They could do it once in a while.

    in reply to: political tweets #125381
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I cannot name one player on NE apart from Cam Newton.

    Patriots 13 Rams 3.

    in reply to: the press & others on the 1st ARIZONA game #125340
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Hill has Arnold originally, and stops in the middle of the field to take the crossing Hopkins (?). So either Hill blows it, or the high Rams defender (Ramsey?) was supposed to peel off Hopkins and take the crossing Arnold. I guess. Looks like Hill played zone, and the other guy didn’t. No idea what the call was, but I do think Ramsey got talked to on the sideline after that.

    in reply to: the press & others on the 1st ARIZONA game #125339
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    sosa K@QBsMVP
    Random: Troy Reeder played a very solid game. He’s completely closed the gap between himself and Micah Kiser, and I think there’s a discussion to be had that he might be better than Kiser.

    That comment caught me by surprise.

    (Thanks for compiling these tweets, zn. I always appreciate it)

    in reply to: our reactions to the Arizona game #125335
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    First of all, congratulations to Colt McCoy. I mean… who knew that guy was still in the NFL? I had completely forgotten he even existed, and yesterday, the man shredded Seattle’s defense for 105 yards passing on just 22 attempts, and ripped a hole in the hull of the Seahawks’ hopes of winning the division.

    Game ball to Colt McCoy.

    Secondly, the Rams defense is becoming the reason to watch them this year. They gave up a bunch of points, but they played better than the scoreboard showed. Thanks to the Rams’ formidable special teams unit for making games unnecessarily close.

    Why, oh, why… did they not keep Bones?

    Hope Brockers is okay. Get Kiser back in there. And…dammit…can we beat New England, pretty please?

    in reply to: our reactions to the 49ers game #125228
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i’ll continue to maintain that he’s a 10-15 qb. that’s still very hard to replace. my inclination would be to keep him. you can win a superbowl with him.

    get rid of him. and you get the rams from 2007-2015.

    I agree with that, and I agree they miss Cooks’ deep threat.

    in reply to: political tweets #125221
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 12/2 & 12/3 #125200
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Kurt Warner agrees with me. Surprised he hasn’t retweeted me yet.

    in reply to: political tweets #125188
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: political tweets #125167
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 12/2 & 12/3 #125164
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Why not just get a new board?

    We’ve been here an eternity.

    In the Old Days, we used to get a new board about every 8 months. Gave us something to complain about.

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 12/2 & 12/3 #125159
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Kurt Warner was on NFL Network today and was asked about Goff and his struggles…..he said Goff is a very solid starter in the NFL who has already proven he can be very good, but people got to stop trying to compare him to other QB’s who could carry a team to a Super Bowl….he said there is only a handful of them that could do that throughout the history of the NFL

    =====

    I think thats about right.

    But I also think he’s been making too many bonehead plays lately.

    w
    v

    Funny the way a Ring changes everyone’s perception, though. If Goff wins a Super Bowl, everything will change in the way people talk about him.

    For that reason, I vote Goff gets a ring this year.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 49ers game #125156
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Also consider that Everett inherited a team that Jeff Kemp, Steve Dils, Dieter Brock and an over the hill Steve Bartkowski won with …he had Flipper, Ellard, Dickerson, and one of the best offensive lines that the Rams ever had

    Dickerson and Everett overlapped barely more than half a season, while Everett was an infant.

    The difference between a team with Dickerson, and a team with Gaston Green is spacious.

    In any event, as I said, I got Everett and Goff as more-or-less a toss-up, anyway. If you put Goff above Everett, I will not track you across the internet and harass you every step of the way for the rest of our lives.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 49ers game #125128
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    you didn’t see that vs KC, or in NO or with a 6-3 record vs Russel Wilson? Time consuming drives to seal games are also important in games where he hasn’t been in position to come-from-behind…. Goff is a decent closer.

    Grit, = getting back up when you’re knocked down to your knees….

    Goff has gotten back up every time. I mean I’m not sure many QBs would have a 43-29 WL record after getting his ass pounded with an 0-7 start under a Fisher regime, including getting a violent concussion from Richard Sherman in Goff’s first start in Seattle as a rookie.

    I’ve never seen Goff quit.

    Sure, it’s been frustrating to see the RAMS lose to SF, 4 straight, but those 4 losses should not be pinned on Goff.

    Quick note on Everett, and I liked him alot… but there’s a reason why that NFC Championship game in 89 was played in SF… he didn’t have the grit to win in the entire month of November, behind the best offense line that the Rams ever had….

    I would never call Goff a quitter.

    Absolutely not.

    You know, when my first impression of Goff is that he is a lot like his idol, Joe Montana. He doesn’t get High; he doesn’t get Low. Even keel, all the time. Something almost…vacant…about his personality.

    Montana had the luxury of playing with Blue Chip players on offense all around, a Blue Chip defense, and coaches who went to the HOF on the first available date. Montana was lucky, seems to me. I mean…he was Good. But Montana is not the reason for those dynasties. IMO. This is actually interesting, now that we arrived at this spot. Because I will bet that Montana and Goff have a similar YPA.

    ++++ Okay…I just looked it up.

    Career YPA Montana (tied for 30th all time) 7.5/yds.
    Career YPA Goff (tied for 24th all time) 7.6/yds.

    Here’s some perspective on that:

    As for Everett, seems to me…as best as I can recall… that the Rams’ defense in those years was smoke and mirrors. They had, like, 1 or 2 blue chip players, 3 red chips, and a bunch of whatever. As I recall, they won with schemes. Like the famous playoff game against Philly. Everett played with Greg Bell, and Gaston Green, and Cleveland Gary. He and Dickerson overlapped about 7 or 8 games. Without Everett…with ANY of the Rams QBs from James Harris on…I don’t think the Rams make that playoff game against the 49ers in the first place. But those teams were Jim Everett, Henry Ellard, a stout OL, Kevin Greene, and nobody. Leroy Irvin, maybe. I might be forgetting a player or two.

    I guess I just see Everett and Goff as a tossup at this point.

    I will say this:

    Goff is pretty accurate – with occasional WTF throws (1-2 per game).

    Goff is steady. He is not impervious to pressure – it affects him – but he does not fold under it, either.

    Goff is resilient.

    He rolls out well, and throws well doing so, but is not a scrambler.

    He is mobile (not a statue), but he won’t punish a team for leaving a lane open.

    His deep ball is okay, but not a threat. He does not have a cannon for an arm.

    His pocket awareness is so-so. He does not get happy feet, or take phantom sacks, but he does not have a 6th sense, either, and will get strip sacked more than one would want.

    His clock awareness is ordinary.

    His improv skills are unremarkable.

    Don’t know about his audible skills, or even if that is a thing in the current offense.

    I mean…that’s how I see Goff right now.

    You rate him higher. Why?

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #125126
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/30 & 12/1 #125124
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Our buddy Mackeyser tweeted back at Deebo that the Rams would be sure to send him a postcard from the playoffs.

    Can’t find the tweet, though. Finding stuff on Tweeter is hard to do.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 49ers game #125120
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So from another angle, better than Sam Bradford, Tony Banks, and Miller in the waning years of his career. Hardly high praise….

    I guess my point is, Being clutch is more of a gut feel and I don’t think Goff is known as a QB who is know for his grit and determination to carry a team in adversity.

    I will say that I think there is a spacious gap between Goff at 4 (in my book) and whoever occupies the 5 spot. The best QBs after that #4 were broken in some way, over the hill, or on very bad teams, and are tough to rate.

    That last comment – grit, determination, carry the team in adversity – that’s the quality I was talking about with the will to win. It isn’t just a question of whether a QB can put the team ahead in the final minutes of the game. It’s that “Fuck this, we will not lose this game” thing that Patton brought to the field when he quarterbacked the Third Army at the Ardennes Bowl. I don’t see that in Goff. Of course, you don’t NEED that to win. It’s not often that quality is called for. I’m not blasting Goff. I’m just trying to understand what he is, and what he isn’t. And I think he’s a top 10 – 15 QB. That’s better than probably 90% of the guys who have taken a snap for the Rams post-Hadl.

    in reply to: political tweets #125092
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: political tweets #125091
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 11/30 & 12/1 #125090
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    McVay is a great coach but when someone has his number, he’s not good at having an effective countermove.

    This hit me when the Bears shut the Rams down the same way the Patriots did in the Super Bowl. I couldn’t believe McVay hadn’t found an answer to that. And Miami did something similar this season, didn’t they?

    in reply to: political tweets #125087
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That’s interesting.

    I’d like to see the 60 years prior to that as well.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 49ers game #125082
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t really blame QBs for strip sack fumbles. You have to expose the ball in order to throw it, and if your arm gets hit when you are cocking to throw, that’s just a good play by the defense. I do blame Goff for the fumble when running, though. If he’s going to tuck and run, he’s got to secure the ball.

    I completely forgot about Bradford. I liked Bradford, but it’s really hard to rank him since he played on some of the worst teams I’ve ever rooted for, and suffered some injuries. I’d like to see what Bradford could have done on this team. I’d guess he would be better than Goff, but who knows?

    I will grant that Everett’s phantom sack is the most ignominious moment in Rams’ history, but he could make every throw.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 49ers game #125054
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    We have different ideas of “will to victory.”

    And I bet the qbs that regularly meet your definition are a very short list. I mean throughout the league and across time. Even Warner showed he wasn’t the same when he did not have a top OL, a hall of fame RB, and two hall of fame WRs. In Arizona he did have Fitz.

    Meanwhile, it is significant, and not negligible, and part of the actual equation, that Goff has been an important part of several Rams wins that could not have happened without the passing game working at the end of close or tied games.

    BTW I rank Goff higher than Bulger and I liked Bulger. There are things Goff can do that Bulger just couldn’t.

    Okay, so I’m not sure how far apart we really are here because I agree with that (except I like Bulger better), but I can’t help but filter your opinion with the knowledge that you were called out today in the Chat for womanly cowardice by somebody, and I think that tarnishes your opinion somewhat.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 49ers game #125049
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    We have different ideas of “will to victory.”

    I see that as an incidence in which the team is not performing well, and the QB makes plays he shouldn’t make, beyond the range of expectation. Yes, Goff has led drives that set up wins, but he did so with mostly clean pockets and mostly open receivers. Goff’s not BAD. I’m not advocating turning the page at QB like Herzog is. I think he IS good enough to win a Super Bowl. I don’t think he’s going to ever win an MVP, let alone get inducted into the HOF. Or start a Pro Bowl. Or end a season in the top 3 QBs.

    In my life:

    1. Warner
    2. Bulger
    3. Everett
    4. Goff

    I dunno. Chris Miller was good, but played on bad teams, and had his best years elsewhere. I leave Gabriel out because I was a kid and it was the first football I watched, and so I can’t say, really. He was a god to me, but I can’t evaluate anything. So… I give Goff 4th place. He might pass Everett in my estimation, but that’s where I rank him now. He’s good enough. I just think it’s pretty obvious at this point that he’s also capable of screwing a game up, too. He might have screwed up today’s game. He sure didn’t do enough to win it.

    in reply to: our reactions to the 49ers game #125042
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, I think Goff has hit his ceiling. He is good, but not great. He plays very well when the game is going well, and he struggles going uphill. I don’t remember a single game where Goff willed the team to victory. He can make very precise throws a lot, but always has that “throw behind Kupp who was open in the flat” kind of thing. That INT was a terrible throw, as bad as Brady’s on Monday. He’s 10-15. And that’s fine… but McVay has not yet figured out how to win, either. He’s a master tactician, and a mediocre strategist. He’s still young and inexperienced, so I wouldn’t say McVay has hit his ceiling, but he’s not elite yet. I don’t see him outfoxing other coaches at this point in his career. I don’t think there’s an excuse for losing this game. There are reasons, but no excuses. A legitimate contender does not lose that game. The Rams are good, and they are playoff bound, and there is still time to get better, but that is a bad loss imo.

    Goff’s two TOs were his fault totally. Neither one was a great defensive play. Both were Goff’s errors.

    If it weren’t for Aaron Donald, that game would have been much worse.

    And what is Jalen doing on the FG? C’mon, man.

    The Rams are still in a good position, and I think they still have a good shot of winning the division, but the Super Bowl goes through New Orleans, not Los Angeles, and that’s where we are. The thing is… I don’t know what the Rams do about this. There are no gaping holes on this team. The secondary is outstanding, the DL is very good, the LBs do their job, the OL has been a strength, their RBs are good enough, their TEs are adequate, their WRs are among the best units going, their punter is the best there is, the QB is in the top half of the league and pushing the top third, and it seems they even found an acceptable PK. So… I dunno. It’s a good team, but not a great team, and while they might be able to get a bit better, I think this is basically a team that needs to fire on all cylinders and catch breaks in order to contend for a return trip to Tampa.

    in reply to: political tweets #125011
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Can we beat the 49ers? #124998
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Do you know what I mean about them always seeming to be up for games and playing hard regardless of personnel? I am not sure McVay has that knack with a team yet the way Shanahan does.

    Yes, I do. It’s my impression as well. But I don’t watch the 9ers enough to give me confidence to go on a 9ers board and assert that as a truth about the 9ers.

    in reply to: Can we beat the 49ers? #124988
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    49ers may have Sherman back as well. Not telling what he has at this point, but he would be an addition to an already good secondary. The 9ers are among the best against both the rush and the pass, so they can frustrate the Rams (as they have done in the past). This game is no gimme, though it’s hard to imagine the 9ers putting up much offense against the Rams, either.

    They had an extra week to prepare and recover, and their backs are against the wall. They have 6 losses right now, and can still tell themselves they have something to play for. A loss to the Rams basically finishes them, as it means their only path to the playoffs comes through other teams collapsing.

    This is a talented team with a very good head coach.

    I think a win here by the Rams will be underappreciated by the national media, and a loss overblown. The Rams should win this game, but – (I’m not a betting guy and don’t follow the spreads and such) – if I had to put money on this game, I would hate to give up seven points in order to bet on the Rams. I think the final score will be closer than that.

Viewing 30 posts - 3,451 through 3,480 (of 7,931 total)