Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipant
I liked this comment
in the commment section btw:==============================
JuanHThere should be an article on how the Seahawks perfected defensive holding
==================
w
vwvParticipantWell, i just dont believe the Cards
are better than the Rams,
and i dont think both
SF and Seattle will
equal last season’s success.So, i think the Rams will
kick down the door this year.w
v
wvParticipanti don’t know. i rather liked holt’s, “ohhohhhohooooohhhhh!!!!!!!!”, when quick caught that ball over the middle…
no joke.
I thought it was interesting when Faulk
said something about Barksdale? doing
something that tipped off whether it
was a run or pass — i think he said
something about that.
Or did i hallucinate that?w
vwvParticipanthttp://www.truth-out.org/news/item/25624-california-supreme-court-nixes-corporate-personhood-advisory-measure-from-november-ballot
California Supreme Court Nixes Corporate Personhood “Advisory Measure” From November Ballot
Saturday, 16 August 2014 12:34 By Brad Friedman
——————w
vwvParticipantIt really seemed to my friend and me, watching from row MM, that the defense was almost deliberately being handicapped. It’s one thing to mostly stay in base defense and not use much in the way of blitzes, trickery, etc. But the Rams D just stayed STOCK STILL. There was no motion, no checking into other alignments in response to O-shifts. Just, “see if you can stop them from this formation” test, again and again.
Fisher was doing something. Maybe testing the secondary, maybe something else. But that WAS NOT the style of defense they will field for the regular games. It just wasn’t. And no Laurinaitis, I think that’s a factor. He’s a pretty good field general for the defense, didn’t see anyone really filling that role for the Rams this game.
Doesn’t excuse missed tackles when guys had the chance, but it does explain some of the giant holes.
Yeah, and against an elite QB and veteran offense, that kind of approach is going to get a defense
carved up. But it will also give the D coaches a lot of plays to look at 🙂
And it gives the secondary players some plays and experience against a great QB.
I think they wanted to see some one-on-one stuff.I dunno, cause i’m no expert, but it seemed to me that Joy-ner
did ok for a rookie. The game does not seem to big for him, imho.
He reminded me a bit of last years version of Ogletree — a bit confused
but you can see the talent.What else did you see from the M&M row?
w
vwvParticipant>zn wrote:
With both Jones and Rhaney down, I am switching to Bradford, center (Wells, Barnes, Person) and Mason.…
What did you think of center?
The centre
did not
hold.w
vwvParticipantIt was hard to watch, but I return to what I said yesterday. The combination of Aaron Rogers running the no-huddle in week 2 of the preseason, and running it expertly, against a Rams’ D that was without its QB JL, and without its best interior run defender, is a mismatch. Combine that with no game planning to stop or counter GB’s offense, and it is not too surprising that the outcome was what it was. Rogers doesn’t look rushed even when he has pressure, and calmly just rifles the ball where it has to be. There is a reason why he has been and can be again the league MVP. Defending 12 play drives in the no huddle probably had our defense ready to spew, but once Rogers left and the game slowed down there was a marked improvement. Unacceptable, but still we won’t likely face that kind of offensive pressure again until we see Manning in week 9.
If the Rams D looks this bad again next week in Cleveland against Hoyer and Manziel, it will be a little more telling but I still have faith in Fisher. Next week will be Cleveland’s first home game and there will be a buzz in the stadium, but I expect that Brockers may be back and hopefully Laurenitis as well.
I agree with all that.
I just dont think Fisher cares about what the fans care about
in the first two preseason games. Seems like in
games three and four Fisher starts building
towards game-One.I’m just not worried about the defense.
With the Personnel Greg Williams has
there is No F’ing Way this defense
doesnt emerge as a topflight D.The only thing that concerns me
at this point,
is the health of the OLinemen.w
vwvParticipantI almost get the impression Fisher was
trying to test his secondary against Green Bay
more than anything else. Ya know.
Doesnt look like he was trying
to get the DLine involved much.
I think he already knows what ‘they’ can do.w
vwvParticipantJust fwiw:
Fisher: (On the running game)
“We were hoping for more. Again, they’re very stout up front. We didn’t do a lot of game-planning, so I’m not too concerned about that, but we’ll get that thing going. But it was a little frustrating at times just because of the penetration. There was so much penetration. Again, I think the coaches will take that responsibility just because we just didn’t really do an awful lot of game-planning. We just called things and talked about the adjustments if this happens. So, I would expect everybody to, obviously, improve.(On if the lack of blitzing on the starting quarterbacks was an indication of how vanilla it was for both teams)
“We had a couple pressures. We had a couple of single pressures with Aaron (Rodgers). Our philosophy was to just line up and play and not rely on the pressure. We pressured a little bit last week and not allowing the pressure, of course. We’re holding a lot of stuff for our regular season as well.”————
Chris Long
(On how much he has learned from the two preseason games)
“The guys in those locker rooms and in the film room and on the team learn a lot, but often times the people outside the building don’t learn as much because it’s hard to decipher what’s real and what’s not. That’s the way preseason is, it’s not always indicative of how things are going to go on the field. For us it’s just about continuing to work on the little things and the result will become more important in a couple of weeks.”
———–Joy-ner
(On the touchdown pass that was committed to him)
“I’ve just got to work on the scrambling technique. Quarterback gets out the pocket, you have to plaster your guy, and I had a mental error. That something we can correct Monday. No hard feelings.”
—————-Aaron Rogers
(On if this game says something about the value of practice)
“I think practice is always important, but these opportunities are important to get the tempo. You’re playing against another team. They played very vanilla on defense, they didn’t bring any pressure really than maybe one snap when we were out there. They didn’t have (DT Michael) Brockers playing, they didn’t have (LB James) Laurinaitis playing, so it felt good for us to run some plays against another team but it’s preseason.”wvParticipant===========================
Laram – Props to QuickTHAT was not an easy catch he made over the middle.
It was a bit high and he had to reach and expose himself in the middle of the field.
It was gutsy play by Quick. That play demonstrates the confidence he’s playing with now.
But I don’t want to see that against the Seahags with Kam roaming the middle.
Sam has got to get that ball down, Quick got lucky that the safety wasn’t looking for the hit.
Kam will be.
====================wvParticipantI only saw the first half.
Aaron Rogers is one of the best players in the NFL,
and he looked like that, playing pitch-and-catch –
but there was
no pressure on him.
Not sure why.Stacy had no holes. The GB DLine bullied
the Ram OLine in the run game.
Not sure why.Rams defense was certainly unimpressive.
Rogers only needed two downs to get first
downs most of the time. Didnt even get
to third downs.Bradford looked good. Quick looked good.
Cook and Kendricks made plays. Bailey.
Tavon didnt drop a pass in the first half.I liked the way the offense responded
after Rogers carved up the defense
the first two drives.The game didnt change my expectations
in any way. Practice-Game two. Enh.w
vAugust 15, 2014 at 8:11 pm in reply to: 101, 8/15 – Britt; Davin Joseph; Mark Chmura on the Packers #4074wvParticipantBritt says Quick
is a ‘basketball player.’Let us hope he can be
a football player.w
vwvParticipantJust had a flash of memory with this post.
For a number of us nomads, the Rams were never home. We followed them from all parts of the nation. I started following them growing up in Chicago (horns + Fearsome Foursome + Roman Gabriel + boring Bears) and then moved to Minny from where I have remained faithful for decades.
Which meant that media coverage of the Rams was nearly unavailable. Neither the Tribune, Sun Times, Pioneer Press, or Star/Tribune ever covered the Rams. Neither did local radio or TV. There was no ESPN nor, of course, was there a web.
And that meant that, at season’s end, I would go for months with no Rams news. Until, finally, the preseason previews came out. Just like this one.
SI would have pigskin previews with thumbnails on each team. And the dedicated season preview pubs would come out with–gasp!–a couple of pages on each team! I’d finally be able to hear a bit about draft picks, acquisitions, and prognosticators’ take.
Then, when the season started, there’d be write-ups of the games–AP thumbnails for the Rams unless they had played the Vikings. And that would basically be it. The sum total of my media-acquired learning about the team.
Now, I look at a preview like this and, besides remembering what it was like to depend on these blurbs, I am astonished at how pedestrian it is. I mean, with the Web and ESPN and NFL Network, we know vastly more than this. There isn’t a bit of information here that we haven’t hashed over for weeks or more. There isn’t an analytical angle we don’t know by heart.
It’s a throw-back to another era. A simpler one, perhaps a better or worse one, certainly one less jaded. But I wonder how an outfit like this can still sell copies? Lots of nostalgic old buffers like me I guess.
Exactly.
…these kidz today and their 24-hour-sports-tv and internet…
w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 5 months ago by wv.
wvParticipantCoachO sounds purty optimistic. Seems to be saying
the only thing that will stop these guys is
key injuries.w
vwvParticipantRW was great. Kinda in the Jonathan Winters mold.
Ah well.
August 13, 2014 at 2:37 pm in reply to: Torry Holt: Tavon Austin’s Biggest Impact Will be on Special Teams #3920wvParticipantI respect Holt’s opinions since he’s played WR at a high level. And, I understand his concern about Austin’s production. But, Austin is not going to ever be a Torry Holt 80-catch-a-year guy. He will be a quick strike guy, though, and if he can get you 10-12 TDs in this offense, he will be a monster contributor. I also thought that in the 2-minute drill at the end of the first half, he showed that he could get open for short sideline passes that he could keep the chains moving at times. I think he can still be a “go to” guy in certain situations, just not a traditional No. 1. And, I’m sure from Holt’s perspective, Tavon was picked too high not to be that No. 1 WR.
I have no idea what Torry is talking about.
Tavon has been ‘quiet in camp’ ?
I think Tavon will be a dangerous weapon
that defenses have to account for on every down —
assuming:
1 Tavon stops dropping passes, and
2 he can stay healthy.Those are open questions.
But as we all know, he’s not a “WR”.
He’s an “X factor” player. He’s a little
of this and a little of that. Whatever
you wanna name it. A TD-maker, maybe.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 5 months ago by wv.
August 12, 2014 at 1:29 pm in reply to: after 1 pre-s. game & all the camp reports what are the concerns v. good omens? #3851wvParticipantI’m concerned
Bradford really didnt elevate
the team, against the
Saints.w
vwvParticipantWhat would be ironic iz
if the strength of the team
turned out to be…the WRs.w
vwvParticipantI have to say, it adds interesting drama. This was a game where it had an effect, too–at the end New Orleans was only up by 2 since they missed one. Some say, why add drama? Except in this case what it replaces–the “gimme” extra point–is a black hole of NON-drama.
So I vote “yes” on the new extra-point rule.
.
Yeah, i agree. Though I also like the idea of eliminating the kick altogether
and just going for two after every TD.I’m not sure which i like better.
I’m not sure how important Kicking
should be in a pro-football game.w
vAugust 7, 2014 at 9:48 pm in reply to: Bernie: It's time to refocus expectations about Bradford #3540wvParticipantOmg. Bernie finally sees the light.
Better late than never.
w
vwvParticipantthey’re all sons of bitches. but williams probably is moreso than the average nfl coach.
he IS from the buddy ryan coaching tree after all… that goes for fisher too.
Well if you-all love him so much,
why dont you just become
Ram Fans then and be done with it.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 5 months ago by wv.
wvParticipantwv wrote:
I wonder which coaches have been the biggest jackasses in NFL history? Al Davis? Buddy Ryan? Greg Williams? Harbaugh?Mackeyser wrote:
Truer words may not have ever been spoken… about Fisher AND now Williams…THEY are now our sunsobitches…
Are you guys ambivalent about Williams?
Not that that’s an unlikely response to him.
Just curious to hear that view spelled out.
No, i’m not ambivalent: I can’t stand him.
I think he’s set up to be coach of the year though.
Add this personnel to ‘any’ aggressive, experienced
coach and i think he would have a top five defense.
I would think.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 5 months ago by wv.
wvParticipantTruer words may not have ever been spoken… about Fisher AND now Williams…
THEY are now our sunsobitches…
I wonder which coaches have been
the biggest jackasses in NFL history?Al Davis? Buddy Ryan? Greg Williams?
Harbaugh?w
vAugust 7, 2014 at 1:00 pm in reply to: Packers game live (NFL net LIVE pre-season game schedule including 2 Rams games) #3491wvParticipantI cant watch it Friday due to
previously-scheduled-commitments
and therefore, no-one else
is allowed to watch it,
either.I expect all of you
to go to church Friday night.
Or meditate in a sweat-lodge.
Or clean your ovens.w
vAugust 7, 2014 at 12:44 pm in reply to: Zuerlein no fan of preseason extra-point experiment/PD #3483wvParticipantThis rule change is silly. It’s a solution looking for a problem. Either keep the conversion kick where it is or get rid of it.
I think i like it.
Traditional PAT’s are kinda pointless.This way, they will be
more dramatic and
nerve-wracking.w
vwvParticipantBritt and Pettis
are free-agents after this season.I guess if Britt has a big
year, there will be a lot of teams
throwing a lot of money his way.w
vwvParticipant<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>wv wrote:</div>
Stedman said he only had to learn about nine plays at WVU,
but with the Rams they add about 20 per day.w
vCan you imagine what 2011 was like for the rookie receivers?
Thats exactly what i was thinking.
If i were an OC, I’m not sure how i would handle
that. How much do you throw at them?
What should you expect of them?
What are the dangers of throwing too
much at them?Especially if they are basically
‘route runners’ like Stedman.
If you have a ‘freak’ like Calvin
or Moss, you can just give them
a few routes and say “go deep
and catch the ball” — but a guy
like Bailey has to know the routes.
I’m glad BS and Fisher worked him
into the lineup slowly last year.And Tavon had even more to learn
cause he was playing all over the place.w
vwvParticipantrfl wrote:
(Obviously, my criticism here is not directed at Maddy!)You sayin’ I can’t take criticism?
Yup. I saw it too, Maddy.
He didn’t criticize you — flat out,
chose not to.Are you gonna take that from him?
w
v
“We all have it com’in kid”
Unforgiven- This reply was modified 10 years, 5 months ago by wv.
wvParticipantI’m skeptical,
about Quick.I’m a doubter.
w
vwvParticipantStedman said he only had to learn about nine plays at WVU,
but with the Rams they add about 20 per day.w
v -
AuthorPosts