Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wv
ParticipantThanks for all the info
over the years,
rambill.w
vwv
Participantwv, I don’t get a good feeling about this game.
I hope I’m wrong but I see the Vikes being able to control the football, running, quick passes–not having to expose Cassell to the pass rush very much.
I’m not sure what the Rams will be able to do on offense. They SHOULD be able to score on this defense. But I can see some inconsistency with Hill having to get into the flow of things. They may get more FGs than T.D.s.
I am concerned.
Hopefully I’m wrong.
Rams 31
Vikings 17w
vwv
Participantwv
Participant=====================================
a brief look at vikings / rams rivalry
http://www.dailynorseman.com/2014/9/1/6092571/minnesota-vikings-st-louis-rams-historyGoing back to the years when they were located in Los Angeles, the Minnesota Vikings and the (now) St. Louis Rams have had a pretty solid rivalry. In the late 70s, they matched up in the playoffs on numerous occasions. The rivalry certainly hasn’t been as fierce as it used to be, but with the two teams set to kick off the first week of the 2014 NFL season, it would appear that we’re in line for a good one here.
As we did last season, we’re going to take a quick look at the history between the Vikings and their opponents, courtesy of the folks from Pro Football Reference.
Total Games Between the Vikings and the Rams: 42 (35 regular season, 7 post-season)
All-time Regular Season Record: Vikings, 24-16-2 (Vikings hold 5-2 edge in post-season play)
Total Vikings points scored, head-to-head: 939 (22.4 points/game)
Total Rams points scored, head-to-head: 939 (22.4 points/game)
Longest Vikings’ winning streak vs. Rams: 6 games (20 September 1987 – 13 September 1998)
Longest Rams’ winning streak vs. Vikings: 4 games (15 October 1978 – 6 October 1985)
Most recent Vikings’ victory in St. Louis: 16 December 2012 (Final score 36-22)
Most recent Rams’ victory in St. Louis: 30 November 2003 (Final score 48-17)
Biggest Vikings’ victory at St. Louis: 28 points, 11 October 2009 (Final score 38-10)
Biggest Rams’ victory at St. Louis home: 36 points, 22 September 1967 (Final score 39-3, game took place in Los Angeles)
A couple of other things about the match-up.
-The Vikings are actually riding a two-game winning streak at the Edward Jones Dome. Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor combined for three touchdown runs in a 38-10 victory in October of 2009, and Peterson’s 212 yards rushing and Everson Griffen’s 29-yard pick-six led the way in a 36-22 Minnesota win in December of 2012.
-Those two games are also the only two times in his career that Peterson has faced the Rams, and he’s done fairly well for himself. He’s rushed for 275 yards on 38 carries (a 7.2 yard/carry average) and three touchdowns.
-Matt Cassel has not done as well, at least where stats are concerned. In two career games against the Rams, he has completed 36-of-62 passes (58%) for 451 yards, along with two touchdown passes and three interceptions. His team did win both games, however. . .a 23-16 victory when he was with the New England Patriots, and a 27-13 victory when he was with the Kansas City Chiefs.
-The Rams will be starting Shaun Hill at quarterback, who got his start in Minnesota and had spent the previous four years with the Detroit Lions. He hasn’t performed too badly, either, despite a 1-3 record against our favorite football team. He came in to relieve Trent Dilfer as a member of the 49ers in December of 2007, and performed incredibly well in a 27-7 Minnesota victory. He completed 22-of-27 passes for 181 yards and a touchdown that day. He was also the Niners’ quarterback in the Vikings’ 27-24 win at the Metrodome in 2009 (i.e. the “IT’S GREG LEWIS! OH MY HEAVENS! WELCOME TO MINNESOTA!” game). He saw the Vikings twice in 2010 as the quarterback of the Lions. The first game was a 24-10 Minnesota victory, and the second game saw Hill’s one win over Minnesota, as he defeated Joe Webb (LOL) and the Vikings 20-13 to mercifully end the 2010 season.
-Yes, even though the Vikings do hold an 8-game advantage in head-to-head record, these two teams have scored the same number of points against each other. The Rams haven’t had as many victories over the Vikings, but the ones they have had have tended to be a little bit larger.
And that’s a bit of a look at the history between the Minnesota Vikings and the St. Louis Rams. The Vikings have had the better of it over the years, and hopefully that will continue on Sunday at the Edward Jones Dome
===========================================wv
ParticipantJT: “… Keenum threw an NCAA record nine TD passes against Rice in 2011.
To put that in perspective,
during the entire 2011 season under coach Steve Spagnuolo, Rams quarterbacks threw nine TD passes.”
==================“To put that in perspective” ? Well, that
would be a pretty weird perspective
if you ask me.w
vwv
ParticipantI could be wrong, but Keenum
dont seem like a safe ‘game manager’ type.
Seems like a bit of a gunslinger.Is that a good match for this team?
w
vwv
ParticipantBtw, how does Keenum know Brian Shottenheimer’s system?
He doesn’t. You misread. Probably deliberately. Just to cause trouble.
Ok, well then, How come he DOESNT
know Brian S’s system? Answer me that.Not everyone likes him, i see, btw:
============================
LaramSo sad that it has come to this for this once proud franchise.
Everybody all excited about an UDFA from that prodigious U of H quarterback factory, that has produced the likes of Kevin Kolb, David Klingler and Andre Ware.
Ugh
==============================wv
Participant“…In Keenum, the Rams are getting a third-year player with some actual game experience, something current backup Austin Davis lacks. The Rams placed tight end Justice Cunningham on injured reserve with an ankle injury to make room for Keenum. Having Davis allows the Rams to have a backup who knows coordinator Brian Schottenheimer’s offense and should also allow Keenum to take his time getting acclimated in St. Louis…”
Well, i think all the regulars Know,
i like mobile-QBs — so….YaY!Let the quarterback controversy
Begin.Btw, how does Keenum know Brian Shottenheimer’s system?
Goes without saying that is a BIG deal. Very important
attribute.w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
wv.
wv
ParticipantPA Ram wrote:
They’re concerned about the circus coming to town with the first openly gay player trying to make an NFL roster. What circus, exactly? A little ESPN story about shower habits? That’s been the big controversy of the last four months with Sam.This sounds exactly right. Meaning that yes that’s what teams are thinking.
And IMO it’s a cover story. The real issue is they themselves can’t handle the idea of a gay player.
Well they would handle it if he were a star player, though.
He’s a borderline talent, though. If he were a Chris Long or an Ogletree,
they would sign him.The NFL is not ready for borderline-gay-players.
Which of course, is not fair.
w
vwv
ParticipantWell, he just seems like a borderline talent
to me. And given that he’s a borderline talent
i think the gay-thing (“he’ll be a distraction”)
probably scares off a lot of coaches/GMs.Jackie Robinson wasnt a borderline talent.
Ya know.w
vwv
ParticipantWell, we dont have many actual facts
in the McDonald case. There’s no video
like in the elevator case.
Might be a ‘he said, she said’ case —
folks often have a ‘reasonable doubt’
in them there type cases.w
vwv
ParticipantChamp Bailey was released by the Saints,
i see.w
vwv
ParticipantSeems to me, ‘IF’ the Dolphins are indeed
using Unicorns, that would violate league drug-policy.Its a well-known-fact that Unicorn powder
is a way to beat drug-tests and has a
steroid-like effect as well.http://www.unicorn-dream.co.uk/unicorn2.html
“There are in India certain wild asses which are as large as horses, and larger.
Their bodies are white, their heads are dark red, and their eyes dark blue.
They have a horn on the forehead which is about eighteen inches in length.
The dust filed from this horn is administered in a potion
as a protection against deadly drugs.”w
vwv
ParticipantI need to know more about
his showering habits
before I can evaluate him.w
vwv
Participant“Who’s next?: Opening day is just ten days away, and the Rams will prepare to host the Minnesota Vikings, whose last visit here was quite memorable. Adrian Peterson ran for 212 yards and single-handedly steamrolled the Rams, 36-22…
The weird thing about the Vikings’ last visit was that Peterson rolled up the mega-yardage despite starting the game with only 8 yards on his first 8 carries…
…The Vikings, for instance, had the #31 defense overall…”
—————————Hard to imagine the Rams having a winning season
if they cant win a home game against
a team like the Vikings.w
vwv
ParticipantSo which what gets the wet dick in the ear?
Would that be the 2nd string punter? Samantha Bee didn’t make that clear in her report…
If you haven’t seen the Daily Show piece, then watch it…
The Stewart excerpt from “Boys will be Boys” got me interested in the book.
Its about the 90’s Cowboys.http://bleacherreport.com/articles/58932-boys-will-be-boys-book-review
w
vwv
Participantjoemad wrote:
I predict 6-10.As good and solid as Stacy was last year with the running game and how good the defensive line can be, the RAMS need to stop to the run and they haven’t in years. Also, with a QB like Shawn that doesn’t have the arm strength or accuracy like Bradford, the margin of error in all phases need to be minimal…. this team seems to get flagged a lot.
I still haven’t forgotten the back-to-back games against Dallas and SF last year… that was ugly, and that had nothing to do with Sam Bradford, and he played in those games.
the RAMS do start off with a soft schedule and can gain some momentum for the season.
one of the many things I like and seen about Fisher is he game plans well for the entire season and gets the most from his young squad and With Clemmens, I was surprised they finished 7-9 last year.
Well, I think the Rams can stop the run. As has been pointed out here, the Rams were the best team against the run over the second half of last season and barring injury this defense looks to be an improvement over last year’s unit.
If they can finish 7-9 with Clemens then I see no reason why they can’t finish 9-7 with Hill. Hill is a much better passer and he has an overall better team around him than Clemens had.
Looks to me, like the two question marks are:
1 OLine Health — can Jake, Saffold, and Wells stay healthy?
2 Secondary — Its young and without T.JohnsonHill to me isn’t even a question mark. I think he’ll be fine. Solid, workmanlike, ‘good-enough’
for 9-7.w
vwv
ParticipantBernie: 5. There’s no turning back. This is a market-driven culture, and a market-driven nation. And though you may not be personally interested in the progress of a 7th round draft choice who is openly gay — it doesn’t mean you get to decide what everyone else wants to hear about, read about, and watch. It doesn’t work that way, sorry. So here’s what you do with anything that displeases you: ignore it. Totally, completely and without exception. And get over it and accept the reality that other people will follow that which interests them — just as you have the right to do the same.
—————-Nah. Sometimes you ‘ignore it’
but sometimes its ok to
Criticize it.Like in the article, Bernie
didnt ‘ignore’ Fisher’s reaction —
he criticized it.w
vwv
ParticipantI ‘get’ that view, but the flip-side
is they just lost their starting QB
and they play in the toughest division in the NFL.So, i dunno. What is ‘realistic’ at this point?
I dunno.
Maybe a team that fights-like-hell,
and brings a ferocious crazed-dog-defense
and efficient offense, and skilled
special teams. I think fans would
appreciate that. Maybe.w
vwv
ParticipantI am still going 10-6, but I don’t know if we can win any playoff games.
I dunno what starts at 10.
But the Parade starts
at 9.w
vwv
Participantwv wrote:
Well, I have to hope Boudreau knows what
he’s doing.Its possible its just ‘rust’.
Thats all i got.
w
vLOL. Not much here to hope in.
You know, Boudreau is a good coach. But he can’t manufacture talent. A good coach can lift a player’s ceiling by, what, 10-12%? Right now, I doubt that’s enough. I am not willing to just say “In Boudreau we trust.”
Right now, with Long suspect and Saffold gimpy we got virtually nothing at LOT.
And you know I must say that Long himself seems to have a teflon reputation. People talk about him as if he’s a quality player. But I don’t know that I’ve ever seen anyone take a realistic look at his pass blocking. It ain’t pretty. It wasn’t great and it’s now pretty awful.
We can hope that it’s “rust,” a very slippery term. I think it’s generally a weak way to look at things. Hundreds of players come back from injury and are never the same. Long has been repeatedly injured–we got him coming off injuries. And I’ve never seen him look good in a Rams jersey–especially pass blocking.
Jake Long really is not playing well. To me, it is a serious concern, and I am not mollified by the magic word “rust.”
Well, he’s not Teflon. There’s plenty of posters that think
he’s essentially broken-down (Laram for one)I thought he was up and down last year. Played
excellent at times, mediocre at times, and awful at times.
I dunno what to expect this year. Maybe more of the same.But i haven’t seen enough of him yet
this year to form a strong opinion.
He’s a Key player, thats for sure.w
vwv
Participantwv wrote:
I would probably like to see Jake Long
get plenty of reps. I want that guy ready to play.w
vWho says he has anything left in the tank?
I have yet to see him demonstrate pass blocking skills above replacement level.
Now he comes off of an injury and everyone says “rust.” What if it’s more than rust? What if he just doesn’t have the juice any more? To play LOT in the NFL you better have feet, agility, power, and the ability to put them together. Honestly, I suspect that he doesn’t have the package any more.
We need a Plan B at LOT.
Well, I have to hope Boudreau knows what
he’s doing.Its possible its just ‘rust’.
Thats all i got.
w
vwv
Participantthe differences are:
1) Dolphins were reigning 1971 AFC Champions when Earl Morral took over the team from Greise in 1972
2) Earl Morrall was Super Bowl III QB that was groomed by Johnny U.The RAMS are reigning division cellar dwellers and Shawn Hill was not groomed by anyone close to Johnny U.
Well, at this point, i suppose, I’m looking for
Nine wins. With Sam i was thinking a Division championship
was a reasonable expectation. Eleven wins maybe.
But now, I’m hoping a powerful running game,
a menacing defense, and smart playcalling
and execution can get them a winning season.
Nine wins.Less than that, and we march
on the Castle, gentlemen.w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
wv.
wv
ParticipantOK, well, I want Hill to be Willis Reed.
Or Connie Hawkins. No, wait, not Connie Hawkins.
Maybe Bill Mazeroski.Anywayz, Earl Morral had some
great Defenses on his great Colt and Dolphin teams.
The Rams D certainly has the potential
to be scary-good.w
v-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
wv.
wv
Participantwv wrote:
Robert Quinn is better ?w
vThis is great news.
Maybe we can package Quinn, a second round pick and Eugene Sims to the Eagles for Mark Sanchez now.
What a break.
Maybe they could package the RG3-gang
for Sanchez:
Brockers, Janoris, Stacy, Ogletree, Stedman, Pead.w
vwv
ParticipantI would probably like to see Jake Long
get plenty of reps. I want that guy ready to play.w
vAugust 27, 2014 at 8:57 am in reply to: Strauss: Bradford's injury is a turning point for franchise #5309wv
ParticipantEverybody has points, but you have to factor in a couple more things. Fisher appears to build his teams to be QB proof, like SF and Seattle do. imo Fisher is not going to have a QB controversy. Whether that is the best thing to do or if I agree with it doesn’t change the fact that it is probably an OK strategy.
Well…it’s tough for a head coach to look good
when his starting QB gets his knee blown out
two years in a row. Thats all i got.I am glad they did not draft Johnny the Idiot
and his entourage, btw.This will be an inter esting year
to say the least.
Britt, Quick, Stedman, Tavon,
Kendricks, Cook, Harkey, Stacy…this offense
can still be ornery if Boudreau
can keep the Oline functioning.w
vAugust 27, 2014 at 7:38 am in reply to: Strauss: Bradford's injury is a turning point for franchise #5305wv
Participant[www.sportingnews.com]
Rams failed by not hedging bets with Sam Bradford
Vinnie Iyer @vinnieiyer
Is it fair to offically call Sam Bradford a total draft bust in the wake of his latest knee injury, another torn left ACL that will cause him to miss the entire 2014 season? Not exactly.
The Rams, on the other hand, keep getting busted for continuing to trust him as their only choice as their franchise quarterback. They continue to pay the price for it in the unforgiving NFC West, and it doesn’t have much to do with the $14-plus million he’ll still make.
MORE: Bradford done for season | Sam sacks Manziel | Top 20 fantasy QBs
Bradford was the last of first overall drafted quarterbacks to get the megabucks before playing an NFL down. As the 2010 No. 1 pick, he got $50 million of his six-year, $78 million rookie deal guaranteed. Although he had a promising rookie season to suggest he was worth it, it’s all gone wrong since.
The Rams are again in the predicament of starting a journeyman backup (enter Shaun Hill, exit Kellen Clemens) with their little chance at winning the NFL’s toughest division down to zero.
Where they failed in relation to the three, all still better NFC West teams — San Francisco, Seattle and Arizona — was not having a different kind of backup plan in place: A Plan B for another starter. There’s an excellent chance they’ll be forced to head that way in 2015. The decision to consider real possbilities would just be coming three offseasons too late.
Two underrated elements for a team to know early if it’s bound to see a return on investing in a highly-drafted quarterback: Durability and steady growth. Arm, athleticisn, accuracy, decision-making and all that other great stuff don’t mean much when you can’t stay and play on the field and improve with each year that you do.
For Bradford, both have been difficult. Following his success with his first NFL offensive coordinator, Pat Shurmur in 2010, Bradford both missed six games with ankle injury and regressed under his second coordinator, Josh McDaniels in 2011.
That should have been the first sign to at the very least explore alternatives in 2012 offseason, in terms of a viable veteran or an intriguing rookie, just in case.
No QBs were drafted, and Clemens was still the No. 2 as the holdover from ’11. That’s despite the fact new coach Jeff Fisher was breaking in a third offense in three years for Bradford, with current coordinator Brian Schottenheimer. Bradford was so-so with Schottenheimer in 2012, but again, it was just Bradford and Clemens going into 2013.
Sam Bradford (AP Photo)Then think about what the Seahawks, 49ers and Cardinals have done in the past three years.
In ’11, even with Alex Smith turning into a pretty good starter, the Niners stashed Colin Kaepernick with a second-round pick. Even when the Seahawks spent on former Packers backup Matt Flynn with intention of him being their new No. 1 in ’12, they still used a third-round pick on Russell Wilson. The Cardinals, who had the worst QB play in the league two years ago, went 10-6 just by adding a passable Carson Palmer in ’13.
All those teams haven’t held back from that mentality of always evaluating quarterbacks this year, either. The Niners were right to cheaply kick the tires on Blaine Gabbert to see if something was still there. The Seahawks think they can help Terrelle Pryor do something better in their offense. The Cardinals think they might have Palmer’s successor as a longer-term QB in rookie Logan Thomas.
In a passing league where so much is dependent on the quarterback, teams can’t afford to ever sit idle with their most important position. Changes and injuries happen to derail even those quarterbacks who looked like safe bets early, a la Bradford.
If one thinks the Rams were a bit trapped with Bradford because of the small fortune they had to pay him early, that would be true to only some degree early. But if they wanted, the rookie wage scale that kicked in a year after he was drafted made it more favorable and critical to not totally rule out a quarterback in the first round.
Last season, Bradford finally looked the part, but then missed nine games with the first torn ACL. At least they did a little something at quarterback this offseason, upgrading Clemens with HIll and using a sixth-round draft pick on developmental project Garrett Gilbert. Still, when you think what could or might have been if they hadn’t just gone all in on Bradford for three years running, it could have been a lot different story.
In retrospect, they had good reason to trade away the No. 2 overall pick in ’12 because of — wait for it — Fisher’s concerns with Robert Griffin III’s fragility. How about the fact that both Wilson and Nick Foles could have been had in the third round? More realistic, they could have just used a second-rounder on Brock Osweiler instead of Isaiah Pead, now a fourth-string running back who’s out for the season. The Broncos had just gotten this future Hall of Famer named Peyton Manning, but even they saw a reason that offseason with — wait for it — Maninng’s potential fragility — to get insurance that high in Osweiler.
In 2013, even in not the greatest QB class, Geno Smith at No. 30 or Mike Glennon at No. 71 would have been worth it given Bradford’s unsolid status. With a second chance at No. 2 overall this offseason, they had their clear shot at Blake Bortles, and passed for the safer Greg Robinson pick. Then they had shots again at either Johnny Manziel or Teddy Bridgewater, at No. 13, and passed.
Sure, they further fortified their ferocious front four with Aaron Donald there, but a pass rush even that good doesn’t mean too much when offset by major passing-game questions. They had plenty of those before even Bradford went down, because they’ve been overdue in providing alternate answers.
In the NFL, there’s a clear separation between the QB haves and the QB have-nots. If you are in their latter category, you just don’t have the luxury of banking on just one resolution, until you have that “have” guy for sure. “Have” should have never been the perception of Bradford — not yet.
The Seahawks and 49ers are easy haves; the Cardinals know they’re not quite there yet, but at least they got a makeshift. The Rams are stuck with neither, further buried among the have-nots.
The lack of putting options in place before Bradford went down — this year, the last, the year before that — is why the Rams don’t have any option but to miss the playoffs for a 10th consecutive season.
===========================CoachO
How easy it is to sit there, and use hindsight to point out all the things they “could have” done, but didn’t. He glosses over the decision to pass on RGIII, as if they lucked out because he has been so frail. He doesn’t even address the huge haul they made, and how htey have been able to address MANY of the roster issues they inherited.
I wonder if this guy, predicted, AT THE TIME, how “passing” on a 3rd round, 5’10 baseball player turned QB was such a mistake.
I also, would like to ask him, even given all the moves Seattle, SF and Arizona have made to continually address the QB position, who is in the best shape to handle what the Rams are handling right now? If a season ending injury were to befall, Kaepernick, Wilson or Palmer, how do you think those teams would feel about having Gabbert, Pryor or Thomas to come in and save their season? I bet every one of them would rather have Shaun Hill.
This organization made their decision based on first hand knowledge of where Bradford was in his rehab. When teams start making decisions out of fear, they tend to panic, and make even bigger mistakes. I don’t care what team you are talking about. How does Green Bay feel about their situation if they lose Rodgers? New Orleans? Denver? Detroit? Atlanta? Baltimore? Can anyone even name the backup to Eli?
Again, it’s so easy to write a piece after the fact. I wonder what that article would have looked like had Bradford stayed on the field, and lead this team to the Playoffs? Or what will look like if Shaun Hill proves to be the guy they brought him here to be and this team somehow takes them where they haven’t been since 2004?
—————————————Laram
…It is not about drafting a replacement. Nobody that I have seen was advocating Fisher do that.
Its about drafting Bradford’s “successor” a young qb with potential that could be developed.
A young qb that could step in for a number of reasons. Salary dispute on Bradford’s next contract, injury, poor play, etc.
There are a plethora of reasons why you might want to have Bradford’s successor developing in the wings.
Bradford’s career has been marred with injury and inconsistent play.
If you’ve paid attention this is a flaw with Jeff Fisher. One that I have pointed out many times.
He has fielded teams with some pretty bad starting qb’s, and had no viable options in the wings.
Look around, the smart franchises have contingency plans.
Loyalty is fine, but you have 53 players to consider….not one!!
=====================================August 27, 2014 at 7:31 am in reply to: Strauss: Bradford's injury is a turning point for franchise #5304wv
ParticipantI enjoyed that one.
w
vwv
ParticipantMort likened Shaun Hill
to Billy Kilmer or Joe Kapp. Said it
might be ugly at times, but he gets it done.Dilfer, who played with Hill, called him
“a football playin dude.”Let us hope,
the Dude
abides.w
v -
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts