Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipant
wv wrote:
I have not seen the game yet,
but did 500 year-old Brandon Lloyd
actually outrun JJ ?
Is Lloyd faster than JJ?w
vWord to the wise (I’m giving you credit for wisdom, wv).
Don’t watch it.
Brutal. Inexcusable.
Watched the replay of it.
O dear.
One of the worst regular-season
plays I’ve seen from a ram CB
in my 40+ years of watching ram
football.JJ loves the big plays
dont he.w
vwvParticipant<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>wv wrote:</div>
So, can they salvage this season, 21?
Do you think they can have a
good second half of the year?Lots of games left
for this messy-confused-infuriating-team.w
vHate being doom and gloom guy, but I don’t see it getting any better than 3-13.
The RG3 trade gave this team a chance to rebuild with young players. Early returns aren’t promising. Looking like the Dickerson trade results so far.
Wow. 3-13.
I dunno. I have no idea,
but my guess is they start
to put it together
in the second half of the season.It certainly looks like GW has
made a mess of the defense though.The offense just seems to involve
a couple parts on the OLine.The story for me right now is
the Rams Coaching staff: What will they do?
What can they do? They
are gonna get withering heat now.
The fans are lighting the torches.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipantI have not seen the game yet,
but did 500 year-old Brandon Lloyd
actually outrun JJ ?
Is Lloyd faster than JJ?w
vwvParticipantEven Fredo thinks the Rams are weak.
Folded up like a cheap suit at the first signs of adversity last night (the Cook call and the pass to Lloyd).
So, can they salvage this season, 21?
Do you think they can have a
good second half of the year?Lots of games left
for this messy-confused-infuriating-team.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipantI wonder if there’s anything different
the coaches can do — or if they
just need to ‘believe’ and stay
the course.They are going to feel more heat
now than at any time since
Fisher got here.It will be interesting to see
what Fisher does.This sure doesnt seem like
what we tend to think of
when we think of a
Jeff Fisher team.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipantWell…um….
things are darkest,
before dawn.Thats all i got.
w
vwvParticipantMackeyser wrote:
Well, that’s part of the “evidence” wv.Far too many games where the much better team is severely penalized with what seems like the sole purpose of either keeping the game close or keeping a team from running away from division opponents and clinching a playoff berth too early.
I mean, the NFL has a HUGE stake in the NFL playoffs being decided in the final week. Having a bunch of teams sit at 12-2 heading into week 15 pretty much seals the deal and only has a few teams fighting for wild card berths…
I can get behind that. Parity is extremely important for increasing revenue. The more meaningful the games, the more viewers they’ll have. More viewers = more $$$.
Well, im skeptical. If the league’s Refs were
trying to keep games interesting, why did Seattle Blow
out Denver in the Super Bowl? Why didnt
the Refs keep it close for the ratings?
Etc.w
vwvParticipantHome teams were 9-3-1 this week. That includes teams like Seattle losing, but it was to Dallas.
And I wasn’t at ALL surprised to hear and read people say that the NFL “needs” teams like Dallas to be good. What a crock of shit.
So, the NFL doesn’t “need” New York to be good? It’s not a bigger media market than Dallas? Chicago doesn’t “need” to be good?
I’d be THRILLED…all caps, bolded, underlined, extra large type… with orchestral fanfare… if the Rams could pull out the win.
I don’t even really care how (other than cheating). Don’t want that.
Well i heard one tv-celebrity-guy say
the league needs Dallas to either
be Real Good, Or, Real Bad.
There’s drama in either story.Thats just how some tv-celebrity-pundits
think,
i think.Rams can win this game, and any other
game if they dont turn it over.w
vwvParticipantWell, i have no idea. Its pretty much ‘unknowable.’
I am ‘open to the possibility’
that individual refs are corrupt
and take bribes sometimes. In
fact I’d say thats almost inevitable.As to a general conspiracy involving
multiple refs tipping games in various directions
for various reasons — Well, again,
I’m ‘open to the possibility’
of it, but I doubt it. I’m a skeptic
until somebody shows me some real proof.Having said all that,
i do think it is highly unlikely
that one team commits ten penalties
and another team only commits one, etc.
Thats just really unlikely, imho.
So, i cant explain that kind of thing.
It vexes me. I think i remember a time
when refs kinda-sorta ‘evened things out’
if one team was penalized harshly.
Thats how i remember it in the olden
days, anyway.w
vOctober 13, 2014 at 7:31 am in reply to: Greg Robinson still awaiting his opportunity — Wagoner #9532wvParticipantjrry32
The choice isn’t A) get an immediate impact player that turns into a stud or B) get a player that develops into a stud a couple years down the road. It’s more of a percentage breakdown. I actually just ran the numbers out of curiosity, for the players drafted in the first round from 2000 to 2004(did this so the final class would have a decade in the league so there was no question about what a guy developed into) the percentage breakdown is:
15% are immediate impact players that develop into studs
15% are not immediate impact players that develop into studs
15% are immediate impact players that develop into starters (but not studs)
15% are not immediate impact players that develop into starters(but not studs)
40% are busts
So I’m not going to complain if it takes a guy 2-3 years to develop into a stud or even a quality starter because he could have very well been a bust. And that’s ONLY looking at FIRST ROUND PICKS over that 5 year period.
Schemes, playbooks, responsibilities, and terminology differ greatly from college football to pro football. It’s not something you just know from playing football; it’s something you have to learn. It’s not about learning HOW to block. It’s about knowing what to do on each given play based on what the defense is showing both pre and post-snap.
I can easily believe that Robinson didn’t/doesn’t understand what’s going on enough to be more productive than Joseph because I’ve seen other young players forced onto the field in similar circumstances and make tons of mental errors due to that…errors that really hurt their team and hindered that player’s development.
People underestimate the mental side of playing on the line. If Robinson can’t be trusted to decipher and pick-up blitzes/stunts, he’s more of a liability than Joseph.
Joseph is good for a few irritatingly bad plays each game but doesn’t screw up on every play. If Robinson goes out there and can’t pick the blitz up, he’s going to get Davis pummeled. Because teams will recognize that and blitz the hell out of him. Worst of all, you risk destroying Robinson’s confidence and undoing the technical work you’ve done to this point. The Rams will get him on the field when he’s ready. If we know that Joseph is bad, you better bet the Rams do.
Why can other rookies start and be successful? Players mature and learn at their own pace…just like people. Some learn quicker than others. Some are more ready because of practical experience than others. Keep in mind that Matthews was a Senior, Robinson was a Sophomore. Matthews started four years in college. Robinson started two years in college. Matthews is the son of a HOF NFL OL and a current NFL OL Coach.
Hopefully, Robinson can be the difference maker on the OL when he plays.
Well, but Snisher could have chosen
a stud who started immediately – Matthews.
We know Matthews wont be a ‘bust’.So did Snisher make the right pick?
Robinson is gonna have to be
better than Matthews
for it to have been the right pick.w
vwvParticipantIt’s early. And there are too many unknowns. But…here’s what I see:
1. Davis is better than Bradford already
2. Bradford is better than Davis & he can come back
3. Bradford may be better than Davis but he can’t come back, and Davis is fine
4. Davis isn’t good enough, Bradford can’t come back, so draft a namebrand college kid high in the draft
5. If Davis improves and Bradford can come back, interesting problem to haveIts a fascinating issue and i think its
the Rams-story of the year – Austin Davis.Bradford and Davis are so…different.
Hard to say who’s ‘better’ but they ‘are’
different.Its way too early to know for sure what
exactly they have in AustinD,
but IF (and only if) he continues to improve…I would
probably ‘prefer’ his game to Bradford’s game.If Austin is gonna continue to miss blitzers,
fail at crunch time and be a turnover machine,
then, he’s just gonna be a good gunslinger-backup.But i suspect, he is gonna improve and i suspect
the Rams have themselves a ram=version of Romo.
Which is fine with me.w
vwvParticipantYeah, i saw that too.
Bucky is gone and
Ungulate.w
vwvParticipantTurnovers.
w
vwvParticipantGood stuff as usual from GC.
He makes me smile sometimes
when he’s asked simplistic questions.I disagree with GC about AustinD, btw.
I think his ceiling is higher than
“midrange quality starter”w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
October 10, 2014 at 1:58 pm in reply to: Greg Robinson still awaiting his opportunity — Wagoner #9422wvParticipantI still like the Robinson pick.
But Matthews was certainly
the safer pick.w
vwvParticipantHas anyone died or gone to prison
from that 99 team?Happy question, i know.
w
vwvParticipantNote: the author of the original post in this thread has since deleted it on the board where he first posted it.
Are you saying the new team owner
wont be PaRam, and the team
is definitely, for-certain,
NOT moving to Allentown Pa ?Because, if you are,
then I’m confused.w
vwvParticipanthttp://articles.latimes.com/1990-12-12/sports/sp-5921_1_cleveland-gary
LA Times
When Gary Fumbles, Everyone Lets Loose
December 12, 1990
|MIKE PENNERThought for the day:
“All great backs fumble.”
–Wendell Tyler, Former Ram Fumbler And some others . . .
OK. Let’s get the Cleveland Gary jokes out of the way.
1. Cleveland Gary and Keith Jackson would be great at “Password.”
2. Cleveland Gary played baseball this summer in the Montreal Expos’ farm system. The scouts said he was good hit, no field.
3. 7-Eleven is Cleveland Gary’s fumbles-lost-to-total-fumbles ratio–not his future place of employment.
4. Cleveland Gary can break tackles but can’t hold onto the football. Gaston Green can hold onto the football but can’t break tackles. The Rams have the running back they need; they just don’t have the genetic engineering.
There. Good to get that out of our system. If Gary can get the fumbles out of his, everybody’s happy.
At 5-8, the Rams seem a lock for the franchise’s first losing season since 1972, discounting strike years. In 1972, the Rams finished 6-7-1 during Tommy Prothro’s last season as head coach. Since then, the Rams’ only other sub-.500 finishes have been the strike years of 1982 (2-7) and 1987 (6-9).
Ram MVP, if there is such a beast, ought to be Buford McGee. With fumbles, interceptions and defenses exploding all around him, McGee has been a lonely bastion of reliability. He leads the team with a 5.7-yards-per-carry average, is tied for second with Flipper Anderson with 41 receptions and ranks third in scoring with five touchdowns. He also pass-blocks by the textbook, covers on special teams and even throws the occasional touchdown pass–doing all the little things so many others have ignored in Anaheim.
One more difference between the ’89 Rams and the ’90 Rams: Last season, playoffs included, the Rams were 6-3 in games decided by a touchdown or less. This season, that record is 1-4.
And another: Last season, Jim Everett takes that extra play against New Orleans and finds Pete Holohan in the end zone for the winning touchdown.
And another: Last season, Everett takes the Rams right down and scores right after the Rams win the coin flip to begin overtime with Cincinnati.
Right now, those two games are the difference between the playoffs and playing out the string in 1990.
=======================http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/cleveland-gary/recent/4
Gary: Fumbles Relapse Will Last Only One Game
November 10, 1992|TIM KAWAKAMI | TIMES STAFF WRITERThis time, Cleveland Gary promised himself and anybody else who would listen Monday, he will not allow his breakthrough season to be ruined by a spree of dropped footballs.
On Sunday, in a reminder of his 12-fumble season two years ago, the Rams’ tailback lost two fumbles to the Phoenix Cardinals, setting up their two winning touchdown drives.
After the game, Gary bolted out of the locker room before anybody could stop him for a public explanation.
But Monday, with his coach and his teammates voicing their support, Gary faced the media, apologized for his postgame duck and said he was too strong to let these most recent fumbles destroy what had been shaping into a Pro Bowl season.
“I want to be a perfectionist when it comes to not fumbling,” Gary said Monday. “Yesterday was a relapse, and I think in order to succeed at anything, I can’t do from a mental standpoint what I did before. . . . I start(ed) thinking about it, and that won’t happen.
“I had one (bad) day. I’m proud of myself, and I’ve learned how to reward myself. I’ve carried the ball a hundred-something times without dropping the football, so what I have to do is put that one day behind me.”
Coach Chuck Knox downplayed Gary’s fumbles on Monday and said he is the team’s tailback, period. Knox said he thought the fumbles were a result of Gary’s trying to make second- and third-effort yards, the kind of running the coach has always admired.
“All I’m going on is what I’ve seen since we’ve been here, and he’s sitting up there (as) about the third-leading rusher in the NFC,” Knox said. “He’s done a good job for us.”
Before Sunday, Gary had fumbled twice–losing one–in 150 carries, and he had come a long way in erasing the memory of his two lost seasons. Last year, Gary fumbled on his second carry of the season, also against the Cardinals, and never got back into former coach John Robinson’s main running rotation.
This year Gary has gained 718 yards in 167 carries and scored eight touchdowns.
Gary’s fumbles Sunday were varied. The first occurred early in the third quarter, when Gary said he was trying to make a big play happen after being held to seven yards on seven attempts during the first half.
He crashed into the line, was slowed, then spun through the pile for extra yardage. But he swung his arm away from his body and exposed the ball for linebacker Eric Hill, who knocked it loose.
“I could’ve very well taken a four- or five-yard gain,” Gary said. “But instead, I spun off, and I put my body in a position maybe I shouldn’t have put it in. I spun off and tried to make something happen.”
His second fumble, which tumbled out of bounds, was similar.
The third, and most costly, occurred when Ken Harvey burst past a block and met Gary moments after he had taken the handoff. “What I have to do (is) go back to the basic fundamentals, get the ball over the pressure points and keep it in,” Gary said. “And what I can’t do, I can’t do.”
===========================Gary Recovers After Fumbles : Rams: Running back says he has put game behind him and apologizes for behavior.
November 10, 1992|TIM KAWAKAMI | TIMES STAFF WRITERANAHEIM — This time, Cleveland Gary promised himself and anybody who listened Monday that he will not allow his breakthrough season to be ruined by a spree of dropped footballs.
Sunday, in a dark reminder of his 12-fumble season two years ago, the Rams’ tailback lost two crucial fumbles to the Cardinals, one of which set up Phoenix’s winning touchdown drive.
After the game, Gary bolted out of the locker room before anybody could stop him for an explanation.
But Monday, with his coach and teammates still voicing their support for him, Gary faced the media, apologized for his postgame duck-and-run, and said he was too strong to let these most-recent fumbles destroy what had been shaping up to be a Pro Bowl-caliber season.
“I want to be a perfectionist when it comes to not fumbling,” Gary said Monday. “Yesterday was a relapse, and I think in order to succeed at anything, I can’t do from a mental standpoint what I did before . . . I start thinking about it, and that won’t happen.
“I had one (bad) day. I’m proud of myself, and I’ve learned how to reward myself. I’ve carried the ball a hundred-something times without dropping the football, so what I have to do is put that one day behind me.”
Coach Chuck Knox downplayed Gary’s fumbles Monday and said Gary is the team’s tailback, period. Knox said he thought the fumbles came as a result of Gary exposing himself trying to make second- and third-effort yards, the kind of hard running Knox has always admired.
“All I’m going on is what I’ve seen since we’ve been here, and he’s sitting up there about the third-leading rusher in the NFC,” Knox said. “He’s done a good job for us.
“I don’t want him to go up in there and just lay down on the ball. You’ve got to go up, take it up in there . . . and he has been hanging onto it. (But) these things happen.
“I still think you’ve got to run up in there as hard as you can run, and fight, get everything you can get–but take the ball with you.”
Before Sunday, Gary had fumbled twice–losing one–in 150 carries. Last year, Gary fumbled on his second carry of the season–also against the Cardinals–and never got back into Coach John Robinson’s main running rotation.
This season, though, with the solid backing of Knox, Gary has gained 718 yards in 167 carries and scored eight touchdowns.
“Yesterday was just an awful experience, but it was an experience that I learned from,” Gary said. “This year, I’ve had so much success pretty much when I’ve wanted . . .
“But yesterday was different.”
On Sunday, Gary’s fumbles were a variety pack of bobbles. The first one came early in the third quarter, when Gary said he was trying to make a big play happen after being held to seven yards in seven attempts in the first half.
Gary crashed into the line, was slowed, then spun through the pile for extra yardage. But he swung his arm away from his body and exposed the ball to linebacker Eric Hill, who knocked it loose.
“I could’ve very well taken a four or five-yard gain,” Gary said. “But instead, I spun off, and I put my body in a position maybe I shouldn’t have put it in. I spun off and tried to make something happen.
“I was pressing it too hard. I was more focused on making things happen than the basic fundamentals. It just left me.”
That was the sort of fumble that plagued Gary in 1990–exposing the ball when he was trying to make late moves. His second fumble, which tumbled out of bounds, was similar.
The third, and most costly, came when Ken Harvey burst past a block and met Gary moments after Gary took the handoff.
“What I have to do (is) go back to the basic fundamentals, get the ball over the pressure points and keep it in,” Gary said. “And what I can’t do, I can’t do.
“I have to keep it there rather than letting it slip sometimes. It got a little comfortable.”
Despite his quick yank last season, Gary said he never feared that Knox was going to pull him for good Sunday, or that his teammates were losing confidence in him.
“That thought never entered my mind,” Gary said. “Coach Knox has judged Cleveland based on what he’s done since he’s been here. Coach Knox isn’t reliving somebody else’s past.
“He looks at a man for his character, the way he is when he sees him.
“I’m grateful that Coach Knox and my teammates haven’t judged me on the past, and I think that’s why I’ve been successful. That has helped my confidence factor tremendously. It gives me motivation to put this garbage behind me.”
And Gary, who said he left the locker room quickly because he was still stunned by his fumbles, made a point of trying to put his Sunday media no-show behind him.
“The first thing I would like to do is apologize for my departing,” Gary said. “It was a mistake. I am human, and I do make mistakes. And one of the mistakes I made (Sunday) was leaving and not facing the media.
“I had a lot on my mind at the time, and I handled it the best way I felt I knew how. And obviously it wasn’t the way I should’ve handled it. I should’ve stayed there.
===========================- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipanthttp://www.si.com/nfl/2014/10/07/jeff-fisher-st-louis-rams
Jeff Fisher: A Rock of Stability
See link..“You point out exactly what happened, then you move on,” says Fisher. “Players don’t make mistakes on purpose. After a tough Sunday, you still want them to look forward to coming to work on Monday.”
Being oh-and-two in this league is rough; oh-and-three’s a bitch,” says the ebullient Dave McGinnis, one-time coach of the Cardinals and now Fisher’s chief assistant. “I’ve been with Jeff when we started oh-and-six” — with the Titans, in ’09; that team finished 8-8 and missed the playoffs by one game — “and when we started 10-0. And from one scenario to the other, I swear his demeanor hardly changed an inch.
“He’s got this California cool about him, a confidence that makes everyone around him think, ‘OK, we can do this.’”
…Fisher was preceded by Jim Haslett and Steve Spagnuolo, two first-time head coaches who never really stood a chance. “We failed them more than they failed us,” says Demoff, referring to the cavalcade of misbegotten trades and bad draft choices perpetrated before and during that 65-loss Slough in St. Loo. If the Rams’ first-round picks from 2000 through ’09 lived in the same zip code — Trung Canidate (’01), Robert Thomas (’02), Jimmy Kennedy (’03), Alex Barron (’05), Tye Hill (’06), Adam Carriker (’07), Jason Smith (’09) — that town would be called Bustopolis. (Steven Jackson, ’04, and Chris Long, ’08, are the productive exceptions.) The constant turnover, Demoff admits, was driven by “the pressure it’s so easy to fall prey to in the NFL, to get better Now! Now! Now!”
- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipantWell…another player talking about AustinD’s ‘fire’
and emotion.Fisher’s first comment: Bennie is good
without the ball.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipant=================================================
LaramI know most here are quite impressed with Austin Davis, and I love his moxy and aggressiveness but he’s going to get exposed over the next several games.
His play was a mixed bag in the Philly game. Early on he was late on some throws, high on others and didn’t show good field awareness.
The slide short of the 1st down where he clearly could have gotten the first down easily, showed bad awareness, and I’m going to mention something again that i mentioned in the chat room.
A number of those sacks were on him.
I will try and put some slides together but go back and look at this play.
2nd qtr Eagles up 13-0, Rams have a 2nd and goal at the Eagles 5 yd line.
The Rams motion to an empty set, the Eagles had an automatic check, its a O blitz (Mama that means the defense is sending 6) Austin has got to recognize that and get rid of the ball quickly, because they’re sending more than you have blockers for.
It is not the o-lines fault, when the defense sends more than you have blockers for, that is on the qb.
When the defense has an automatic check, against an empty backfield, they’re coming. That’s qb 101, even I know that.
Austin never sees the free rusher, boom, sack fumble…Eagles ball and a 14 pt turnaround.
All AD has to do is look down the line to his right, and he will see where the free rusher is coming from.
This was an easy one and recognition that an NFL qb should see.
That was another one of his TO’s that was very costly.
Good defenses will definitely see what I do.
—————
I’m already rolling with AD, I roll with ANY Rams qb.What I’m attempting to do is illustrate that the hysteria should be tempered with a bit of reserve.
====================================================
I agree with La that AustinD made some critical mistakes.
He’s a work in progress.But its only his third game, right? So even though
other teams will scout him and gameplan him — HE
is also going to get better one would think.Three games. Thats all he’s played.
He’s showed me a LOT so far.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipant=================================================
LaramI know most here are quite impressed with Austin Davis, and I love his moxy and aggressiveness but he’s going to get exposed over the next several games.
His play was a mixed bag in the Philly game. Early on he was late on some throws, high on others and didn’t show good field awareness.
The slide short of the 1st down where he clearly could have gotten the first down easily, showed bad awareness, and I’m going to mention something again that i mentioned in the chat room.
A number of those sacks were on him.
I will try and put some slides together but go back and look at this play.
2nd qtr Eagles up 13-0, Rams have a 2nd and goal at the Eagles 5 yd line.
The Rams motion to an empty set, the Eagles had an automatic check, its a O blitz (Mama that means the defense is sending 6) Austin has got to recognize that and get rid of the ball quickly, because they’re sending more than you have blockers for.
It is not the o-lines fault, when the defense sends more than you have blockers for, that is on the qb.
When the defense has an automatic check, against an empty backfield, they’re coming. That’s qb 101, even I know that.
Austin never sees the free rusher, boom, sack fumble…Eagles ball and a 14 pt turnaround.
All AD has to do is look down the line to his right, and he will see where the free rusher is coming from.
This was an easy one and recognition that an NFL qb should see.
That was another one of his TO’s that was very costly.
Good defenses will definitely see what I do.
- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipantRay Ray’s the type of player that needs to get shocked, to understand his lesson. Getting released might have been just what he needed to finally “get it”. He’ll probably go on to become a very productive player for the raiders.
I kinda doubt he will be a good player.
He seems a bit cog-ish
to me.w
vwvParticipantI keep trying to do is to establish a clear eyed look at RIGHT NOW. What is Fisher and his coaching staff doing RIGHT NOW with THIS Ram team?
And he is, IMO, quite manifestly FAILING. This pre-season and 1st 4 games have constituted FAILURE to produce competitive football. That’s just fact. You do not win more than a handful of games in a year played like this.
Is the year over? No.
I always love your posts, my old comrad.
But our brains just work differently or somethin. My own
“clear-eyed look at right now” tells me that i cant
just reduce a complex multilayered mystery down
to one word: Failure.It just seems more confusing to me. I dont
have all the information I’d need to say: Failure.
AustinD looks VERY interesting to me. The Weapons look
good. The only problem i see on O is a couple of parts
of the Oline. Thats fixable and Greg Robinson may
be one of those fixes.I dont see this “undisciplined” team you do.
And i dont see a ‘lazy’ team.
I dont think it was a mistake to come out passing in that game.I suspect it was a case of some young players not being
ready for a good team in a hostile environment.But i dunno. You see “Failure” and i see
a team on the verge of finding itself. Very close.Time will tell. Who knows.
w
vwvParticipantwv wrote:
I dont agree, RFL
For me, its too early to judge Fisher’s season.
w
vReally? Honestly? He hasn’t had enough time to get the season going?
I just find that a remarkable thing to say.
How much time are you willing to give him?
After all, as you said all through the offseason, it’s Year Three!
I dont know how long I’m willing to give him,
but I’m willing to give him more than one-forth of year three 🙂It would be different if i thought they were an overmatched mess.
But i think this team has real potential and talent and is CLOSE
to coming together. The ‘way’ they are losing is actually
infuriating, frustrating AND encouraging to ‘me’.I mean you just said in another thread, it feels like 98.
Well doesnt that mean Fisher has them ‘close’. I think they are.I could be wrong 🙂
But somewhere near mid-season give or take a game
or two, i am expecting to see a good team.
If it dont happen, I’ll reevaluate and
think about it some more.What if they whip the 49ers?
Lets see how it goes next Sunday.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by wv.
wvParticipantThere’s a Wagoner audio where he’s asked if he
likes the nickname “Sackcity” and he sez
“Yeah its a good nickname because its singular
and not plural — and the rams only have
one sack”w
vwvParticipantThis is a problem all over the country now.
Its worth reading up on. Its appalling
what police depts and prosecutor offices
are doing :w
vwvParticipantThanks for posting the quote, ZN.
I feel the entire team is on the up…and it’s just a little more time to get there.
These young Rams made mistakes…but they fought hard and nearly made history on the comeback.I take great heart and inspiration by those young kids playin their heart out!
I havent watched the second half yet on replay
but i watched the end of the first half, and i gotta
say the run defense was dispiriting on that last
Eagle drive. The Rams had scored to get some momentum
and make it 13-7, and the the Eagles McCoy just gashed them
and gashed them. And the Eagles methodically gutted
them all the way down the field to make it 20-7.Ugly. Very ugly defense on that key drive.
w
vwvParticipantFisher has clearly failed this year. I think he failed last year, too.
I’d love to see a new coach next year, though of course a replacement could make things worse. There are worse coaches, and I can imagine why some might want to give him 1 more chance, though ’15 would be the last one.
But he has failed this season. Pretty badly.
I dont agree, RFL
For me, its too early to judge Fisher’s season.
12 more games to play.
I’m expecting them to improve.w
vwvParticipantInteresting. They gave up
on RayRay.w
v -
AuthorPosts