The Goff fumble

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle The Goff fumble

  • This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Hram.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #108003
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    NFL rules analyst Gene Steratore says Jared Goff's fumble should've been incomplete

    NFL rules analyst Gene Steratore says Jared Goff’s fumble should’ve been incomplete
    Cameron DaSilva
    1 hour ago

    One of the biggest plays in Sunday’s game between the Rams and Steelers came just before halftime when Jared Goff fumbled the ball and it was returned 43 yards by Minkah Fitzpatrick for a touchdown. That gave Pittsburgh a 14-7 lead with 1:44 left in the first half, taking any sort of momentum away from the Rams. The Steelers would hold on to the lead and go on to win 17-12.

    The play was reviewed, as all touchdowns are, and the ruling on the field stood as called. Well, after watching the replay several times, many fans and analysts came away wondering if Goff actually fumbled it.

    It could’ve very easily been called a forward pass and incomplete, but that’s not how the officials on the field saw it. Former NFL official and CBS analyst Gene Steratore disagreed with the ruling and shared his thoughts on the play on Twitter.

    He believes Goff’s arm was coming forward when the ball came out, which would’ve made it incomplete.

    After the game, Goff was asked whether it felt like a pass instead of a fumble.

    “It did. I haven’t seen a replay though. So I don’t know,” he said. “Once I see a replay, I’ll let you know, but it felt like I threw it, but who knows. I haven’t seen it.”

    This will probably do nothing to help the way fans feel about Sunday’s game, but a former official with 15 years of experience views this play differently than those who were on the field Sunday.

    Had the play been called incomplete right away, it likely would’ve stood if the Steelers challenged it. However, since it was deemed a fumble, the officials decided there wasn’t enough evidence to overturn it.

    #108006
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Already posted, Jack.

    But I will take down the prior one.

    But please look first when posting articles. Thanks. Especially in this case where the previous posting was the next thread down from this one.

    Screen cap:

    #108013
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    If I believed in karma, I’d say the football gods have more than made up for the PI in last season’s NFC championship game.

    Between injuries and bad calls, the Rams season is on the verge of ruin.

    #108024
    Hram
    Participant

    There is no way to explain the ball traveling forward 10 yards except that golf threw it forward with at a minimum a flick of the wrist.

    Having said that the reason we lost this game is the oline play.

    #108028
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Having said that the reason we lost this game is the oline play.

    I dunno. Take away that score by the Pitt D and the Rams win 12-10.

    #108045
    Hram
    Participant

    True, provided everything else remains the same.

    And a missed field goal earlier means you had to go for a touchdown on the 2nd to last drive.

    And…

    Bottom line is anything even slightly better than mediocre line play and we win by two scores, IMO.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.