Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,321 through 1,350 (of 7,218 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams tweets…9/1 – 9/5 #140411
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: UFOs – Interesting thread from Caitlin #140410
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    She’s right that it doesn’t consume much bandwidth. If they were just looking to increase Space Force for the usual corporate profit/hegemony motives, it seems that this would be getting more run on cable news.

    And I don’t know that they really need UFOs when they have China and Russia, if that was the goal.

    in reply to: Thu 9/8 8:20PM ET – Buffalo Bills … the build up #140397
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Vegas has the Bills -2.5.

    Super Bowl champions are 19-1 opening the following season over the past 20 years.

     

    in reply to: animal bits #140392
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have a similar feeding process when around good seafood.

    in reply to: the 53 #140391
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It takes a series of miracles to repeat as champions, but ya know, the rams are definitely in the mix. But I cant picture them having enough general-scariness to win it ALL without OBJ. Thats the ‘kind’ of addition that tilts things just enough. Its a large piece of the puzzle, i would think. Late in the year, if they can add a healthy OBJ they would be a different team than they were in, say, the previous 12 games or whatever. He turbo charges them. So, i keep thinking about that there situation. I did not know he was as good as he turned out to be. I never followed him. But that guy just changes things. w v

    Emphatic agreement.

    in reply to: around the league (starting 8/11) #140356
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, not sure if you noticed but the new deal has a no-trade clause, so I dont think they can trade him if some other team loses a starter, etc.    Course, i guess if he requests it they could do it.

    It’s player option. He has the right to refuse to be traded if he doesn’t like the destination.

    in reply to: around the league (starting 8/11) #140350
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The 9ers mishandled this from the beginning, but restructuring his contract was making the best of a bad situation, imo. They tried every tactic in the book to try to trade him, and there just wasn’t a market for him. It may be easier to trade him now that his contract is rewritten, but he has now missed all of the preseason (including the 9ers’ preseason in which he not only did not practice, he did not even get this year’s playbook from the team). One radio blabber ventured to guess that G restructured his contract because the 9ers would have cut him otherwise which would have hit his reputation and future value. They will lose him after this season, but they probably figure having him as a backup is worth more to them than whatever little draft capital they could get for him at this point. Maybe someone loses their starter, and trades for him later, but that becomes less likely by the day. He is probably headed towards a phase in his career where his is the best backup QB in the league for 2-3 years.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #140340
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    TMW2022-08-31color.png

    in reply to: camp, pre-season, week 5…& the game (on now) #140324
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Lance McCutcheon should change Rams’ long-term plans at WR and maybe even any thought of signing OBJ.

    Uh…

    of the 8 possible WRs to possibly make the 53 roster (according to Rodrigue), there are 6 of them I would not hesitate to cut to make a spot for OBJ.

    in reply to: A-A- Ron Donald…and the Cincy practice brawl #140300
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    hmmm. well. i certainly hope he doesn’t get suspended…

    Homer.

    in reply to: A-A- Ron Donald…and the Cincy practice brawl #140296
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10046781-nfl-rumors-rams-to-discipline-aaron-donald-players-in-bengals-brawl-internally

    The Los Angeles Rams are going to handle discipline for Aaron Donald and other players involved in Thursday’s brawl with the Cincinnati Bengals internally.

    A Rams spokesperson issued a statement about the situation to ESPN’s Sarah Barshop: “The incident will be addressed internally, and any discipline will remain in-house.”

    According to Barshop and Ben Baby, the Rams and Bengals ended their joint practice early when a “melee broke out during a team drill featuring the Bengals’ first-team offense and the Rams’ first-team defense.”

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: A-A- Ron Donald…and the Cincy practice brawl #140289
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think the Rams should suspend Donald for the final preseason game against Cincinnati.

    in reply to: A-A- Ron Donald…and the Cincy practice brawl #140287
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Stafford … rankings & assessments #140240
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I wonder how the Rams would have done if they had had Stafford in Super Bowl 53 ? Rams were 13-3 Pats were 11-5 Goff was 19 for 38 for 198 yards. Sacked 4 times. 1 INT. Rams only had 62 yards rushing. (Have the Rams ‘ever’ had a good rushing game in a super bowl?) Rams had 9 penalties, Pats had 3. Pats had 407 total yards, Rams had 260.

    Dunno. I will always believe they would have won if they had Kupp, though.

    in reply to: Stafford … rankings & assessments #140238
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t know why I bother reading this board when people make claims like, Stafford is so good, he would perform well under fire from archers.

    You guys know nothing about football.

    The Spartans were annihilated, btw. The Persians sent pressure around the flank and collapsed the pocket from behind.

    in reply to: Watson #140221
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: The police #140220
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #140219
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: cuts & injuries & roster talk #140198
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It is a bummer about Bruss and Hardy. Those were the two most promising rookies. Hardy’s season may not be over, but he’s not going to get more than a few plays on the field this year, unless there is depletion in the LB department.

    in reply to: Rams Quarterbacks #140191
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Every time i see that stat, I smile.

    And you don’t even have idiot brothers who are Cowboys fans.

    in reply to: Rams at Texans thread (game Friday 10 et 7 pt) #140186
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I dunno.

    Rams lost to the Texans.

    Looks to me like the season is over before it even starts.

    in reply to: Rams Quarterbacks #140185
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think everybody is overlooking the fact that the Dallas Cowboys have not made it to the NFC Championship game since they won the Super Bowl in 1995.

    in reply to: Rams Quarterbacks #140155
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, by the time I actually started watching games weekly, Gabriel was on the back nine, and as a kid new to football, I don’t trust my opinion of him. I estimated him highly, but I have no idea if he merited that.

    I think I generally agree with your rankings. Of the Tier 3 guys, I would probably take Bulger first, and Goff last, but…yeah…same tier. I’m not sure there is a lot of space between Tier 2 and Tier 3, actually. Looking at those guys, the ones I’m least certain of are Hadl and Miller, and that’s because they were with the Rams a short time, and towards the end of their careers, but they both played better than anybody in the Tier 4 list, for sure.

    I’m not finished with Stafford, but…yeah.

    in reply to: animal bits #140152
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That’s parenthood.

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 8/8 – 8/15 #140125
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t see Skowronek or Tutu as locks. I guess Powell is, and you can call him a WR if you want, but his job is to catch the ball and not trip over his own feet. He’s replaceable, and he’s only on the Rams because neither Tutu nor Skowronek could clear that bar.

     

    Whatever. I’m going only on what I see in games, not in practice, and not on film. But if McCutcheon can return kicks…he’s already shown more as a receiver than any of those three guys, albeit just one game, a game in which the Chargers secondary looked like the Keystone Cops.

    in reply to: What is going on here? #140121
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    You control what you can control. If you block him he can’t respond to you so as far as the rest of twitter is concerned, there’s nothing to see from him that would involve you. Don’t overthink it. Just block people that pester you. Block and done. Not blocking them gets taken as an invitation to pester you more. I don’t even remember who it is I have blocked. I just blocked them, and voila, no more problems.

    Okay. I’ve never blocked anyone because it’s always been somebody who is just being rude, and it’s been confined to tweets that fewer than 100 people even saw.

    This guy was going for the jugular in a personal way in a tweet that drew 80,000 viewers. He was trying intimidate me into blocking him. That was his goal. He even said so.

    But it was in the sunset of the tweet’s life, and when I quit responding, he gave up.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #140119
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    no image description available

    in reply to: What is going on here? #140117
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    But a block just means he can’t see my tweets, right? It doesn’t delete his tweets, or prevent other people from seeing them.

    I don’t know.  I’m still unclear on all the twitter functions.

    Anyway, after a bit, I realized his original target was someone else, and then he turned on me when she blocked him, and nobody else was involved. So it was just the two of us off in a remote corner of the internet, and he had no purpose other than to try to agitate me, so I just let it die on the vine.

    Weird experience, though. The whole 4K “Likes” and all the Retweets was weird, too. It just destroys Notifications like a dump truck unloading pea gravel in your account. It drowned out everything, and I lost track of a couple of those bite-size interactions which is what I’m used to. Those interactions were hopelessly lost.

    I now know why big accounts never respond to comments on their tweets. It’s practically impossible.

    in reply to: What is going on here? #140113
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Enh. Never mind.

    The guy is just a troll. The acct has 15 followers, and follows 3 accts. I’m gonna guess those 15 followers are his other troll accounts.

    It was just momentarily disconcerting to have a guy screenshotting pretty old tweets and trying to frame me negatively. You know…like…why?

    But when I recognized it was just a troll, it all became clear.

    in reply to: What is going on here? #140111
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oops. Here is the original tweet. I accidentally copied the wrong link

Viewing 30 posts - 1,321 through 1,350 (of 7,218 total)