Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 6,541 through 6,570 (of 7,923 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: This really happened: Jimmy Kimmel, Alex Jones & pickles. #51989
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Have you ever had difficulty opening a jar?

    If so, you know it has nothing to do with physical fitness.

    Opening a jar, or being unable to open a jar, is without question the poorest test for the presidency I have ever heard of.

    Yet it was the test the Hildabeast campaign chose to fix in her favor to address the issue of her health.

    You know it was on the Jimmy Kimmel Show, right? This wasn’t a press conference where Hillary came out to demonstrate her fitness for the presidency with a feat of strength. I can’t believe you take this seriously. It. Was. A. Joke.

    in reply to: This really happened: Jimmy Kimmel, Alex Jones & pickles. #51981
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Have you ever had difficulty opening a jar?

    If so, you know it has nothing to do with physical fitness.

    Opening a jar, or being unable to open a jar, is without question the poorest test for the presidency I have ever heard of.

    in reply to: Bridgewater hurt? #51917
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    My heart certainly goes out to all Vikings fans everywhere.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    And then, there is historical evidence out there that ties these lines in the 3rd verse to the British habit of using hired mercenaries and captured American soldiers who were forced to work on the British behalf.

    Nonetheless, even if the lyrics are meant in bigotry (it is known that FS Key owned slaves), it is clear that 99.9% of Americans don’t even know that 3rd verse and the vast majority would never sing them. Trying to tie past viewpoints to current understanding doesn’t seem fair to people who are alive today. Those should remain with the dead.

    You may have a point, but if you were black, and accustomed to being treated with suspicion, you would probably see those lines as a reminder that your country sees you as a secondary citizen. Right?

    And it is the National Anthem. It’s in the National Anthem. It’s not just another song. It’s the song the country stands up for, removes their hats for, and places their hands over their hearts for.

    in reply to: the Kaepernick controversy #51912
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    ________________________________________

    Good words there, zn.

    While I believe in free speech, I also believe one must be wise in what they say publicly. Words reflect back and, in this case, can hurt the team and efforts to both unify the team and reach out to the fan base.

    If I spoke out on every issue I thought strongly about, probably half of my patients would be upset or feel alienated somehow. That’s not fair to them.

    \

    This, imo, is the only valid argument against what he did.

    That it will divide the team, and distract them from their jobs. There is some merit to that argument, I believe.

    However, I will point out that there are all kinds of behaviors – holdouts, drugs, anger issues, violence, laziness, primadonnas, on and on – that can do the same thing. A football player has to focus. A professional has to focus. In theatre – which is the world I know – actors convince the audience they are batshit crazy in love with one another even when they actually hate each other in real life. That’s focus. That’s professionalism. That’s on Coach Kelly.

    CK knew this would cost him money, and he’d get killed on social media. And that it wouldn’t make any difference in the end.

    And he did it anyway.

    Because it mattered to him. Enough to go through all this.

    I respect that.

    in reply to: JT on Bradford in Phil #51911
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Agree. I didn’t like the trade, though I understood it.

    Nothing to do now but hope Goff is the real thing.

    in reply to: Rams cut 14, Lomax is number 15 #51910
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The only people I have even HEARD of on that list are Coples and Bertolet. And I only know Bertolet because kicking is prominent. So I noticed him. But he knew, just like everyone else knew, that he a a camp leg. Coples is the only one with a name, and his release isn’t a shocker, though I’m a teeny bit surprised he was in the first round of cuts. The rest of the guys were camp bodies to begin with.

    in reply to: the Kaepernick controversy #51901
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well I dont think it will help much at all. But i think every little iota of leaning-toward-the-light helps. You didn’t just write it wouldnt help, but you wrote it would hurt. “divisive” etc.

    Yeah, it’ll cause divisiveness, but it’ll cause other things too. All in all, I think its a ‘positive’ thing, despite the divisiveness.

    Do you think the Carlos/Smith act was meaningless or divisive?

    I like the fact it was aimed at Grid-iron fans. Gridiron fans get HEAVY dose after dose after dose of the usual pro-authority, pro-system crap. I am in favor of them seeing another point of view on that.

    w
    v

    Yeah, me too.

    Sometimes shaking things up a little is all you can do.

    in reply to: the Kaepernick controversy #51897
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Back in the 80s, I sat through the national anthem all the time. I was pissed off about foreign policy. So I sympathize with his symbolic gesture that the USA distributes its freedoms unequally. Injustice and inequality are a Way of Life for black Americans. He’s right.

    Will his gesture make any difference? Well, nothing measurable. It got a lot of people talking, but probably no opinions shifted about the issue, only about Kaepernick himself. But the gesture mattered to him, and to some other people. He has a brief, brief moment in the spotlight, and he can live his life knowing that he used a moment of that time to make a statement about injustice on behalf of millions of Americans, for whatever that’s worth.

    I don’t know what else he can do. Or anyone else. There is no quick solution to the problem he is highlighting. Maybe there is no solution at all. But I sympathize with his need to make a statement about it, to say publicly that it matters. What else can he do? What are the alternatives?

    in reply to: Havenstein hasn’t been ruled out for Thurs #51876
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am sorry Thomas wasn’t invited out by one of the papers. But I get it.

    Imagine working at a paper for years, and the NFL comes to town, and rather than promoting from inside, they give the job to Thomas. It probably wouldn’t be good for morale. I dunno. I just think Thomas was always a good egg. Honest, no bullshit. Had integrity when it came to the tricky stuff in house he was privy to. Decent guy.

    in reply to: reports: Cooper & maybe Gaines out a couple of weeks #51862
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    spruce better be playing next week. can’t imagine they’d be able to start the season with 2 injured receivers on the roster.

    That’s a good point, although they probably won’t need any receivers against the 9ers, anyway. So that gives them an extra week. Getting the 9ers first is kind of like starting the season with a bye. From what I’ve heard, they aren’t even strong enough to stand up during the national anthem.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I don’t know.

    I wonder whether the people who are truly pissed off about this would be susceptible to persuasion in other ways anyway. And what are the alternatives?

    What he has achieved is 3 or 4 days of people talking and writing about it, including the interesting piece that anchors this thread. That would not have been written if Kap stood up last weekend. Right?

    It is true he can’t control the conversation once it begins, or even keep it focused on the issue he wants addressed (all kinds of digressions are going to crop up). But some people are talking about relevant aspects of this rather than just setting jerseys on fire and trolling the internet.

    He needs to follow it up.

    But, frankly, I don’t know what the cure is. It seems to me that police ought to be better trained. I’ve seen a video comparing training here versus Norway, and it’s kind of an eye-opener. And they should be trained to look for “tells” rather than to racially profile. Simulations can teach them that.

    And we need to put more money are resources into minority communities, balance the way education is financed, and so on.

    But none of that has any chance of happening without provocation of some kind. Had CK stood last weekend, this thread would not exist.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I did not know that.

    That is interesting, and certainly a reason to question the appropriateness of the Star-Spangled Banner as national anthem.

    Of course, that isn’t what CK was protesting.

    Most of the debate surrounding his sitting seems to be centered on whether it was “appropriate” or “effective.” I am not seeing much on the issue he was protesting. And although I haven’t tracked many comments on this either on the radio or online, there has been a predictable “How dare he slight the military men and women who risk and sacrifice their lives to protect his freedom?” as if the flag is a primarily a military symbol. I think THAT perspective is one worth questioning in itself.

    The fact is that the flag is used primarily to shut people up in this country.

    in reply to: Alex Jones and the Nephilim who still roam the Earth #51857
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    —————–

    The thing that gets me though, is how a lot of these mentally-ill folks get ‘some’ things right. I mean, i remember reading some of that stuff the Unibomber wrote, and he got some of it right. Charles Manson got some things right in an interview i read not too long ago. Alex Jones gets some things right. Even Zooey, sometimes gets some things right.

    Even the unhinged seem to have some insight…it just gets mixed in with all kinds of
    twisted-ness. Or somethin.

    w
    v

    “Zooey is just too long; there are too many cigarettes, too many god-damns, too much verbal ado about not quite enough.”

    ~ John Updike

    in reply to: Rams cut Coples #51853
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    And QB Dylan Thompson. Whom I never even heard of.

    Rams QB Dylan Thompson announced Sunday night that he has been waived by the team, as they work to get down to 75 players by Tuesday’s deadline.

    I was released today by the Rams. Another part of the journey and looking forward to the next stop God has for us!
    6:44 PM – 28 Aug 2016
    102 102 Retweets 459 459 likes

    Thompson, 24, wound up signing on with the 49ers as an undrafted free agent out of South Carolina last year. He was unable to make the 53-man roster, but was later signed to the 49ers practice squad.

    San Franscico elected to promote him to their active roster towards the end of the season, but he was unfortunately released shortly after this year’s draft. The Rams later signed him to a contract in June.

    Thompson has yet to appear in an NFL game.

    in reply to: reports: Cooper & maybe Gaines out a couple of weeks #51852
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Cool.

    in reply to: Paul Wolfowitz 'might have to vote' for Hillary Clinton #51846
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Trump is going to get nothing but negative coverage. He is toasted.

    in reply to: Paul Wolfowitz 'might have to vote' for Hillary Clinton #51784
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    You may be right, Billy, about the “workers” rhetoric. That completely fits.

    In any event, on a number of issues, it is apparent that Trump is just completely unfit for the job. He’s reckless. Bottom line. He is just reckless.

    And nobody wants a reckless president.

    (except for those people who root for the Joker).

    in reply to: Romo out for most of the season? #51739
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well I’ve been waiting for the first QB to fall.

    Winter is coming.

    w
    v

    You know who’s next?

    Tom Brady.

    Only the Pats will conceal the injury because they won’t want his suspension deferred, and we will get another Patriots scandal.

    in reply to: Romo out for most of the season? #51726
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Gotta imagine a lot of Cowboys fans are eyeing the Dak Prescott era now. Everybody has to be weary of Romo’s history. Worse than Saffold’s, I bet.

    in reply to: Paul Wolfowitz 'might have to vote' for Hillary Clinton #51706
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It is certainly true that Trump will push tax policies that benefit the 1% and screw all the rest of us (including his voters), but he is a loose cannon on trade. He has said things about NAFTA and the TPP that worry the 1%.

    You know these guys are not lockstep foot soldiers who ask the 1% what they’re supposed to think. I seriously doubt any of the more infamous warrior neo-cons could give a crap about trade policy, for example. If they even think about it.

    These guys are about foreign policy. And in that arena, they know…in detail…how batshit crazy Trump is.

    And they’re right.

    And they made the right choice.

    Because in fact he IS that bad. They went and looked at the policies and evidence and came to the right conclusion.

    .

    .

    Yeah, I think there are the neocons, and the Corporate rulers, and they have separate reasons for being wary of Trump.

    The neocons are worried (rightly) about his foreign policy craziness, and not so much about the 1% (although they have some interest in that). Wall St and the rest of the barons are concerned about the trade and labor issues, and not so much the foreign policy stuff. I mean, I doubt Wolfowitz cares much about the minimum wage, and I doubt that the Koch brothers care much about Syria.

    in reply to: Paul Wolfowitz 'might have to vote' for Hillary Clinton #51700
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I really think now it’s just right-wing elites are afraid that they can’t trust Trump to do their bidding for the richest 0.1%.

    You wish.

    It’s because the people who were a mess before recognize with vivid clarity that Trump is even MORE of a mess. Oh, and, he will be helpful to the 1%…just look at his policies. His domestic economic policies help them even more than Bush did. So that is not the issue.

    Even the last round of Bush nutcases recognize how bad Trump will be.

    Remember in this thread we’re talking about what some nutcases got away with under Bush. That’s true.

    AND then we act like Trump won’t get away with things? Forget it. It’s a pipe dream.

    Of course he will. This wish that Trump isn’t going to be bad as he seems is just not going to hold up.

    Even the previous assholes recognize that.

    Yes he is worse, and yes once in office he can do things.

    Yeah, I’m not so sure. I think Dak may be right.

    It is certainly true that Trump will push tax policies that benefit the 1% and screw all the rest of us (including his voters), but he is a loose cannon on trade. He has said things about NAFTA and the TPP that worry the 1%. And a lot of wealth is only too happy to have immigrants who will work for below market wages, under unprotected conditions, with no rights. I think, at this point, it’s pretty clear that Trump doesn’t understand his own policies well enough to be trusted to do the “right” thing for the capitalists.

    in reply to: Why would modern humans mate with Neanderthals? #51655
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Why would modern humans mate with Neanderthals?

    Bigger brains. Neanderthals apparently had bigger brains and were stronger physically.

    Home Sapiens won the war. But it’s kinda like VHS versus Betamax. The latter should have.

    Neanderthals were certainly more powerful than modern humans but it’s doubtful that their larger brains made them more intelligent. One study found that more of the Neanderthal’s brain was devoted to vision and body control than ours and less was geared towards cognition and social interaction. This would make sense given the way they hunted. Neanderthal’s didn’t kill from a distance like modern humans. Their spears were designed for stabbing not throwing. Therefore, a Neandethal had to get within a couple meters of his prey. Vision and body control would have come in handy when you’re only a few feet from an angry bison with nothing but a spear for protection. They must have been incredibly athletic to avoid getting trampled or gored every time they hunted but they must have taken a beating nonetheless. Many of their bones show evidence of healed fractures. They lived a tough life.

    So… a bunch of linebackers, basically.

    in reply to: 35,000 lobbyists #51633
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    At one point, I pointed out how it’s kind of ridiculous that we are a very wealthy nation, but have so many poor people suffering, and we do very little to help the poor, and instead blame them for their plight while the mega-wealthy get richer.

    Yeah, I just encountered a “meme” on facebook pointing out that of all the Wall St. criminals, the only one in jail is Bernie Madoff. Would that be because – instead of robbing the 99% – he robbed the 1%?

    in reply to: Why would modern humans mate with Neanderthals? #51632
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Doesn’t it happen in bars around the country every night?

    in reply to: Alex Jones and the Nephilim who still roam the Earth #51604
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    “Donald Trump, in my opinion, is God’s prosecuting attorney. He’s laying out the evidence…”

    Donald prosecutes em’ then Buffy executes em’. Those demons don’t stand a chance.

    Trump seems to attract a disproportionate amount of support from the unhinged.

    It seems to me that his supporters just see whatever they want to see in Trump. He is just a walking, talking Rorschach.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’d give Keenum about 10-15 snaps which could be 1-3 series, depending.

    Goff I’d give around 25 – 30, switching from 1s to 2s throughout, and the rest to Mannion.

    in reply to: 35,000 lobbyists #51522
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That sums it up, doesn’t it?

    in reply to: articles etc. on Goff — preseason games #51504
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’m betting he did. It’s just nobody was comparing anybody to Montana yet.

    Wrong. It was widely reported that during week three of his first training camp Montana looked like George Blanda during week two of his 25th training camp.

    That is utter nonsense.

    Montana never kicked an extra point in his life.

    in reply to: JT chat, 8/23 (selections) #51503
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Hey Jim, seems to me like Rams have made a habit of trying to be smartest guys in the room at the draft. Whether its Brian Quick, Grob, Tavon and looking like Goff. In each case these players were seen as projects with huge upside. Fact is though in each case there was a more legitimate option who didnt need to develop as much who we passed on. Goff might be exception but sure gave up lots to get him. Would we be worse team with Alshon Jeffries (Quick) , Deondre Hopkins (Austin), Jake Mathews (Robinson) Paxton Lynch ( Goff)
    by simdaddy 3:56 PM

    JT: I wouldn’t call it a “smartest guy” complex. I think the Rams pay too much attention to workouts and measurables over production and intangibles.

    Oh, come on.

    Grob was the consensus pick at the time. Some people preferred a different player, but nobody thought that was a “cute” pick. Goff was nothing like a reach, and had both the production and the intangibles. Tavon would have gone to the next team picking. Quick was a surprise. But none of the others really were.

Viewing 30 posts - 6,541 through 6,570 (of 7,923 total)