Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 5,221 through 5,250 (of 7,935 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Wait…didn’t we get Miami’s 4th?

    And where is the Rams’ 4th?

    Rams 4th was traded for Peters.

    It is the year of 4ths and 6ths.

    First of all…that equals 9, so I make a motion that zn is removed as Treasurer of the Board.

    No it’s 10. 1 1st, 1 3rd, 2 4ths, 1 5th, and 5 6ths.

    But you didn’t list two 4ths. You said 111 or 130.

    Give me your badge.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Wait…didn’t we get Miami’s 4th?

    And where is the Rams’ 4th?

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Now its:

    Round 1 (23)
    no round 2
    Round 3 (87)
    Round 4 (111 or 130)
    …tba, Giants
    Round 5 (160)
    Round 6 (5 picks, including one going to Miami and one coming from NYG)
    no round 7

    10 picks total.

    First of all…that equals 9, so I make a motion that zn is removed as Treasurer of the Board.

    Thirdly, what the hell does a team even do with 5 picks in the 6th round? Feels like taking a handful of darts and chucking them all at once towards the dartboard. Maybe we trade those 5 6th rounders to Cleveland for their 1st round pick, and explain that 5 picks times the 6th round equals 30, whereas their one 1st round pick is worthless. They might be dum enough to go for that. It is Cleveland, after all.

    in reply to: wv teachers #83615
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I heard on the radio that they haven’t had a raise in 4 years. And any contract they are getting now will be a multi-year contract, probably 3 years.

    So they are getting an average raise of…0.7% per year.

    ———————

    You know, i heard one video where a teacher also mentioned that the Police will get a raise as a result of this too. I havent heard anything else about that or heard anyone talking about it.

    But I am wondering if that was part of a strategy. The police have a long history of busting Unions…so…ya know.

    Anyway the Rep-thug politicians are now threatening everyone in the state and trying to undermine teacher power by saying the teacher raise will be coming out of everyone’s pockets, the old, the sick, etc etc.

    Cuz you know, the Reps are always looking out for the old and sick.

    w
    v

    Yeah, I heard an interview with some ahole talking about how medicare would have to be cut. Every day is a new abomination. It is just incredible that Republicans have so much power given their total buttfuckery of everything and everybody outside of the 1%.

    Today they are celebrating a repeal of some regulation that prevented coal companies from using rivers as drains.

    in reply to: Rams trade Ogletree #83613
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well…either these guys are big dummies, or they’re geniuses. They are bold.

    If they keep Watkins and TruJo out of this, sign Donald, Gurley, and Goff…well…I give up Quinn and Ogletree and Austin for that. Yeah. I mean…some people have to go…and it’s only business to look at the size of paychecks, and who’s earning what. And Austin isn’t earning that salary, and Quinn is clearly on the downside, even if he can be a quality player for another couple of seasons. And Tree probably isn’t worth that money, though I am less sure of that one. I don’t know what Wade needs his linebackers to do, and what it costs for the guys that can do those things.

    in reply to: tweets 3/7 … the Ogletree trade #83606
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    What Vinny and Alden say makes sense to me.

    I just look at that list of needs…and that’s a lot of LBs.

    I like Littleton, though.

    in reply to: Rams trade Ogletree #83605
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am stunned. I saw this on my phone earlier, and couldn’t get here until now. You guys aren’t helping me. I need some explanation.

    Tree isn’t my favorite player. He wasn’t going into my Ring of Fame. But he seemed decent. And I saw some upside still, since he was just moved to MLB.

    So…I have faith in Wade. I think he knows what he is doing. Tree doesn’t fit his scheme. Okay. But…

    The Rams run a 3-4.

    And right now, I’m not sure they even have 4 LBs on the roster. WTF? Quinn’s gone, and AO is gone now. And Barwin is a FA, and there is talk of not keeping Barron.

    Where are we now?

    I mean…we have about a dozen picks in the 4th round now. Is the LB draft pool especially deep so that there will be 6 or 8 starters available in the 4th?

    This move surprised me. But…uh…these guys have a track record of knowing what they are doing, so I will just sit here and wait for the next spectacle. I guess.

    in reply to: Patriots picking up Kenny Britt’s option #83556
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t think any time has come close to picking up the number of ex-Rams over the past 10 years as the Patriots have.

    in reply to: wv teachers #83545
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I heard on the radio that they haven’t had a raise in 4 years. And any contract they are getting now will be a multi-year contract, probably 3 years.

    So they are getting an average raise of…0.7% per year.

    in reply to: some tweets, 3/6 #83541
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    If you’re the Rams, I don’t think you can risk losing Joyner. You’d prefer not to lose Watkins either, but in 2017 the offense was great with Watkins basically as a speedy decoy. Joyner likely would be tougher to replace at this point.

    That’s what it boils down to, imo. I hope they keep Watkins, but losing Joyner would hurt them more than losing Watkins.

    A year ago, who would have thought that would be said about a WR on the Rams?

    in reply to: Rams tag Joyner; Watkins to test free agency #83536
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    While I think this is the smarter move, I think it will probably cost them Watkins. Somebody is going to pay him more than the Rams will. Maybe the 49ers who have a lot of cap room and no WRs for Garapalo to throw to.

    in reply to: GRITS has passed. #83490
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    What a shock. Wow. I guess he really is the Great Ram in the Sky, now.

    I met him once at Candlestick in the ’99 season. I’m glad I did.

    Passionate is right. I don’t know if there was anybody crazier about the Rams than GRITS was. I haven’t seen him online in a long, long time, but he sure was a memorable character, and I am saddened to hear he has passed. I often thought of him, especially how happy he must have been to see the Rams return to LA. He will be missed.

    in reply to: Maher on socialism #83442
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    On the “millennials want free stuff” nonsense.

    Right. And Maher is just perpetuating the fraud that getting services from the government in exchange for your tax money is “mooching.” Americans have been brainwashed into resenting the sliver of the budget that goes to people who pay less in taxes than they do while never noticing that the lion’s share of their taxes are being directed into corporate profits, very often corporations who are harming society in significant ways.

    What a world.

    I just don’t know what little guys are supposed to do about a political and economic system which is completely rigged for the benefit of a tiny minority when the vast majority of the victims of the system believe to their cores that the problems are caused by other victims of the system.

    in reply to: Maher on socialism #83431
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    He is hit and miss. That socialism rant isn’t even about socialism, and he ignores the obvious fact that many countries have those things AND MORE all without Santa Claus’ intercession.

    in reply to: Billy Collins: The History Teacher #83430
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Introduction to Poetry
    BY BILLY COLLINS

    I ask them to take a poem
    and hold it up to the light
    like a color slide

    or press an ear against its hive.

    I say drop a mouse into a poem
    and watch him probe his way out,

    or walk inside the poem’s room
    and feel the walls for a light switch.

    I want them to waterski
    across the surface of a poem
    waving at the author’s name on the shore.

    But all they want to do
    is tie the poem to a chair with rope
    and torture a confession out of it.

    They begin beating it with a hose
    to find out what it really means.

    in reply to: mike gesicki #83429
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I was with you right up until the Penn State thing.

    That’s a background that’s hard to overcome.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Gonzalez is pretty good. I enjoy reading his stuff. He’s got the Jim Thomas role, I suppose, and he’s good at it.

    I wonder about Barwin. Sure, he’s a UFA, but he isn’t going to get any money anywhere. I mean…the Rams can afford Barwin without thinking twice. He wasn’t particularly impressive to me last season, but he knows what he’s doing, and they need somebody there. I would think the Rams would make an effort to keep him. Especially if Barron doesn’t fit. You don’t really want to give up on 3 LBs in the same offseason.

    in reply to: Rams trading Quinn to Miami? #83368
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I guess they can sign Watkins and Donald and Joyner now.

    They always could do all that, even with Quinn. Anyone saying otherwise didn’t know the numbers.

    No, trading Quinn is about more than that. I expect a big FA signing now.

    Or maybe it makes room to keep Johnson.

    in reply to: some tweets, 3/2 #83367
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Vincent Bonsignore@DailyNewsVinny

    Cooper is a better, more powerful, instinctual runner than Austin (on sweeps & out of backfield) and a better WR. Will add to that role

    Yeah, I don’t know about that. More powerful, perhaps. But I think there is a dropoff. Just not a dropoff that matters much…certainly not $10 million worth, or whatever it is.

    Snead hasn’t done a lot this offseason, but I like what he has done. Hope it’s a 3rd for Quinn. That would be pretty great.

    in reply to: Is Trump in trouble? #83321
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Nixon was the last president
    who gave a rat’s ass about
    the working people.

    ============

    Well.

    I think if we are now missing Richard Nixon
    these may not be the best of times.

    w
    v

    It’s a bit of a sobering thought, isn’t it? Since Nixon, it’s been about escalating the arms race and becoming the greatest imperial power in foreign affairs, and deregulating finance, weakening unions and the social safety net, and running up the score on Wall Street.

    in reply to: Health Care a 'fringe issue' to Democrats #83315
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It’s becoming evident that the DCCC—and the billionaire donors and revolving door consultants that make up the Democratic Party establishment—believe Democrats can only take back Congress by running on a watered down message…

    Enh. I don’t know if that’s what they believe. On the contrary, their polling must show that those issues are popular with the voters.

    They are unpopular with the people who finance them.

    in reply to: Is Trump in trouble? #83314
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    She also ran a terrible campaign, was disliked, for good reason, by too many voters . . . and the Dems have hurt themselves tremendously for decades by basically turning their backs on the working class. Goes back to the early 1970s, at least.

    I have often tried to escape this conclusion, but I can’t: I think Nixon was the last president who gave a rat’s ass about the working people in this country.

    in reply to: Is Trump in trouble? #83294
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    No politician in American history has gotten away with as much illegality, immorality, mendacity or personalized viciousness toward others as Trump has.

    I have to call my own number here. Early in election discussions, some people flirted with the idea that Trump wouldn’t be that much worse than any standard issue dem. My view was, he was going to be far far worse. By a huge margin. I think that’s exactly how it played out.

    Yeah, but…that wasn’t the complete argument.

    Speaking for myself (and ultimately I WOULD have voted for Clinton if California had been in single digits), I weighed not only who would be WORSE (clearly Trump), but what the likely long term voter outcome would be.

    I.E. Trump was always going to be worse. No question. But he was always going to be THIS. What we are seeing. He was always going to be THIS bad. So bad that it is obvious to the entire nation that he is terrible.

    VS.

    Hillary. Who would have been less bad, but bad. Very bad. In all kinds of less obvious ways.

    AND…

    Americans are stupid. They make corrections by turning the other way. So the reaction to Trump was always going to be to pull the damn thing to the Left.

    But a reaction against Hillary was going to be to pull it to the Right. And into the arms of some shithole like Pence. Or Marco fucking Rubio.

    The question was…was it better to suffer bigly under Trump and hope for a hard correction to the Left…or suffer in lesser ways under Clinton and just continue to suffer with no possibility of moving to the Left of her?

    And that wasn’t clear to me…although…as I said…I would voted for her if California had the least tiny chance of going to Trump.

    But now I dunno. This country looks to me to be Pretty Pissed Off with Republicans right now. It wouldn’ta been this pissed with them if Hillary had won.

    in reply to: Why did Calif Dems reject Diane Feinstein? #83291
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Because we is Commiefornia, and we hates her, we does.

    Kevin de Leon is to the left of her, and received close to, but not quite, the % necessary to win the outright endorsement of the California Democrats.

    De Leon is significantly behind Feinstein in the polls at the moment, but there is hope. She still has the upper hand because the Senate race will be between her and de Leon, and Republicans will probably all vote for her since she’s basically a Republican, and no Republican is going to qualify for the final ballot anyway.

    But…the answer is, she is a fucking Republican, and that’s why we hate her.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, he is not Lawrence Phillips or Pacman Jones. Strikes me as more of a Terrell Owens, but with anger outbursts instead of big ego outbursts.

    kinda reminds me of turley. he’ll be fine and then all of a sudden he’ll grab an opponent’s helmet and throw it across the field.

    Much better comparison. Yeah. Sometimes people grow out of that, though, and that’s the hope. Looks like 28 other teams did not think there was any chance of that.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i gotta say, watching that innterview, i like him. he may be crazy. but i like him. i just hope he’s able to mature.

    i think this guy has it all – just has to learn how to keep his emotions in check.

    ==============

    I liked when he noted how he will miss his team-mates. And he named some of them. That was genuine.

    I’m sure there will be incidents in the future, but my impression is he can be reasoned with.

    w
    v

    Yeah, he is not Lawrence Phillips or Pacman Jones. Strikes me as more of a Terrell Owens, but with anger outbursts instead of big ego outbursts.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well…he seemed genuine. I didn’t sense a bunch of agent-coached horseshit.

    in reply to: teachers (images/ideas of teachers in the wake of Florida) #83221
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, he’s played Madden.

    Well, if he’s done that kind of research, he is definitely the man.

    in reply to: new on the trade: compensation #83219
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Seems about right to me considering the risk.

    Straight up talent value, the Rams win this trade easily.

    Risk factor makes this about right. I think. The Rams could get a Steal, or they could have burned a 2nd round pick for a year of headaches.

Viewing 30 posts - 5,221 through 5,250 (of 7,935 total)