Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
znModerator
April 20, 2019 at 1:21 pm in reply to: RAMS draft…articles, vids etc. on just the Rams draft #100142
znModerator
znModeratorfrom Jay Glazer’s NFL mailbag: https://theathletic.com/934097/2019/04/19/jay-glazer-nfl-draft-mailbag/?source=weeklyemail
Are there any technological developments that have been made in scouting this offseason? —Hunter L.
JG: I don’t know about technological developments, but more teams are looking at the mental health side of things than ever before.
They’re looking at things a little bit differently and I think five years from now it will evolve into a much deeper spectrum of tools. This year is different than it was five years ago. Mental health doesn’t just mean depression, anger, suicide, it could also deal with motivation, desires to be great or the “why” a player does or thinks a certain way.
The more they can unlock in the 6-inches between the ears the better.
They’re trying to figure out, is this guy going to want to be great? Is this guy going to be able to handle outside family issues or outside noise? I think mental health is starting to play a bigger part than any technological development.
Why is it okay for a quarterback like Russell Wilson to set a deadline for an extension and no one in the media even begins to criticize it whatsoever? —Juda S.
JG: The reason why is because we’ve been around every single strategy and negotiating tactic that you could ever imagine so no one overreacts to it. We’ve seen it all. We saw Le’Veon Bell sit out the entire year, people are split on that. We’ve been in the middle of labor disputes between the NFL and the NFLPA, between players and GMs. We’ve seen it all… for the most part.
My advice to players and GMs, to both sides, is just remember you guys are duking it out and it’s ugly right now but everyone goes through the ugliness of negotiations and, eventually, you come out the other side — and once you do, you’ll need to act all lovey-dovey after that.
znModeratorI like Žižek. From what I can tell this “reporter” does not get what he’s saying. He doesn’t like philosophical debate. Okay, not everyone does. But it’s like listening to a description of a superbowl narrated by someone who doesn’t like, doesn’t get, doesn’t follow, and doesn’t know how to watch football.
April 20, 2019 at 10:08 am in reply to: Super Bowls, Quarterback cap percentage and Russell Wilson #100129
znModeratorThis was a separate thread but belongs here.
***
Andrew Brandt@AndrewBrandt
Biggest myth in NFL team building: you can’t have a top level roster with a QB making upper echelon money. Simply not true, an excuse and a cop-out.Steve Wyche@wyche89
Can I get an amen?Louis Riddick@LRiddickESPN
Exactly…which is what everyone is looking for. Excuses.Andrew Brandt@AndrewBrandt
Re top QB pay: it is not the big salaries that get teams in Cap trouble. It is the renegotiations stacking future Cap to save money in the present. Some teams have QBs making $20M and counting $30M on the Cap. That’s bad management.Dan Orlovsky@danorlovsky7
The “just have a cheap QB and pay everyone else” thought:
-Since 2012 (Russell draft year) I calculated that there have been 118 teams over that 7 year span to go “cheaper” route-they’ve won 3 SB’s. Same time span-96 have gone “not cheapest” they’ve won 4 SB’s…🤷🏼♂️Jason Cole@JasonCole62
In 2013, Aaron Rodgers’ $23M per year average deal cost the Packers 17.9% of the $122M cap (although
that’s not really how the cap works with contract averages)In 2019, Russell Wilson’s $35M average will cost the Seahawks 18.7% of the $188.2M cap
Vincent Bonsignore@VinnyBonsignore
If someone tells you you can’t build a championship team while paying a franchise-caliber QB franchise-caliber QB money, they don’t know enough about NFL economics to really be commenting. Draft. Develop. Be disciplined in who you pay to keep, get or let walk. It’s been done.
znModeratorGil Brandt@Gil_Brandt
We never cleared the room but sometimes we’d lay traps for scouts we didn’t trust. In 1987 we showed our board to a scout with us taking Mike Junkin, a LB we didn’t like. Two days later, Cowboys beat writer Jim Dent wrote story saying we were taking Junkin.Hook, line, stinker.
Gary Myers@GaryMyersNY
Hey Gil. How about when you lied to me in 1988 that you were taking Gaston Green even though you had Walker and Dorsett? You were counting on me telling George Young so NYG wouldn’t know you were hot for Michael Irvin. Nobody can be trusted this time of year, right? Even HOFers.
znModeratorNickell Robey-Coleman allowed just 0.71 yards per snap in slot coverage – which was the second-best rate in the league last year. pic.twitter.com/ICtIhbnbzY
— Pro Football Focus (@PFF) April 20, 2019
znModerator31. LA Rams – Nasir Adderly CB/S Delaware
95. LA Rams – Michael Jordan OG Ohio State
100. LA Rams – Ben Banogu DE/OLB TCU
134. LA Rams – Daylon Mack DT Texas A&M
170. LA Rams – Corey Ballentine CB Washburn
205. LA Rams – Montez Ivey G Florida
253. LA Rams – Darnell Woolfork RB ArmyI think they need a tackle more than a guard!
Other than that, I am no draftnik, so, I reserve judgment. I do appreciate all the work.
…
znModeratorSam Monson@PFF_Sam
Asking a coach which players they’d draft is essentially asking them who has the highest athletic/physical potential. Cos they’ll coach em up.Peter King@peter_king
I dislike doing the mock draft.
It is just another way for people to look at me and say, “Man, you’re stupid.”
I get enough of that already.
znModeratorMy sister found these awesome hand painted nesting dolls in Prague. #LARams 🐏⬆️ pic.twitter.com/nQHcoFBo3h
— Troy from Troy (@troilus22) April 19, 2019
znModerator#American Icons #JohnWayne & #RomanGabriel in the Undefeated film. An early time in #AsianAmerican #Filipino history, Gabriel was a role model for many #Filam's having broken many barriers as the #NFL's 1st ever star QB, major endorsements, movies & starting many charities. #tbt pic.twitter.com/YsiajkVLIy
— Roman Gabriel for Pro Football Hall of Fame (@RGabriel4HOF) April 18, 2019
znModeratorAnd how long will it be before it’s destroyed in a Hollywood disaster movie?
You mean like the last superbowl?
April 19, 2019 at 5:46 pm in reply to: 2019 NFL draft big Boards & Mocks & other all-purpose draft stuff #100099
znModeratorPlenty of surprises in Rob Rang’s Updated First Round Mock Draft
Rob Rang
Can Rang match last year’s success in projecting all first round QBs to the correct team?
The 2019 NFL Draft is less than one week away and the only thing we can say with certainty is that there are going to be plenty of surprises.
That is always the case in the NFL draft, of course, but what makes this year unique is the difference in opinion atop virtually every position group. Think about it, with the exception of tight end (T.J. Hockenson), edge rusher (Nick Bosa) and inside linebacker (Devin White), there is little consensus as to who will be drafted first at each position, much less second, third or fourth.
With one more week to press my best sources – they helped me project all five QBs to the correct teams last year – here is how I see things shaking out in the first round.
Rang’s final mock will be posted here at NFLDraftScout.com Wednesday night, April 24.
1. Arizona Cardinals – Kyler Murray, QB, Oklahoma
Murray has some bust factor to him but he is the most dynamic player in this draft and an ideal fit in Kliff Kingsbury’s offense. Expect Josh Rosen to get peddled with the Giants (which have 12 draft selections to play with) a particularly intriguing fit.
2. San Francisco – Nick Bosa, OLB, Ohio State
Sure, the 49ers already boast a pretty fearsome front with DeForest Buckner, Solomon Thomas and shiny new edge rusher Dee Ford but Bosa could turn a team strength into one of the better units in the league.
3. New York Jets – Ed Oliver, DT, Houston
Like the 49ers a pick earlier, the Jets need merely to pick their favorite flavor of the dominant front seven defenders available to them. Oliver’s quickness would seem a terrific fit in new defensive coordinator Gregg Williams’ ultra-aggressive scheme.
4. Oakland Raiders – Quinnen Williams, DT, Alabama
Arguably the best player in the draft falling in your lap? Mike Mayock the analyst would have to give the Raiders and their new GM an A for this selection, despite Oakland already possessing a lot of young talent up front.
5. Tampa Bay – Devin White, ILB, LSU
Count me among those who believe that the Bucs are going to take big, big strides in Year One under Bruce Arians – mostly because of how he will corral Jameis Winston. Hitting an immediate impact star as the QB of the Bucs’ defense would go a long way in correcting last year’s under-achieving defense, as well.
6. New York Giants – Rashan Gary, DL, Michigan
Could a quarterback go here? Sure, but all Dave Gettleman has ever done so far is be honest about his affinity for hog mollies and running the ball. Gary is a Jersey native with the size, strength and athleticism to one day be viewed as the best player in this draft.
7. Jacksonville Jaguars – Jawaan Taylor, OT, Florida
Like Gettleman, Tom Coughlin is a straight-shooter. He believes in size and physicality in the trenches. Taylor might rank second or third among tackles for some but he’s a perfect fit for the Jaguars’ offense.
8. Detroit Lions – Josh Allen, OLB, Kentucky
Dynamic off the edge, better dropping into coverage than most assume and team leader, Allen checks off too many of the boxes Matt Patricia and Bob Quinn appear to be using to let slip any further.
9. Buffalo Bills – D.K. Metcalf, WR, Mississippi
The Bills are another run-first (and second) team but what is the point of adding a quarterback with as strong of an arm as Josh Allen if he can’t unleash it every now and again. Metcalf has the speed and size to make play-action a legitimate threat.
10. Denver Broncos – Drew Lock, QB, Missouri
I love the fit of Lock in Denver, though adding a speedy linebacker like Michigan’s Devin Bush is another exciting option. Lock’s arm, mobility and swagger could remind John Elway of himself and the Broncos would have time to make Lock earn the starting role, learning behind a consummate pro in Joe Flacco.
11. Cincinnati Bengals – Devin Bush, ILB, Michigan
Much of the focus nationally has centered on the Bengals replacing Andy Dalton but don’t be surprised if it is instead a changing of the guard at the QB on defense that occurs instead. Bush is faster (and plays smarter) than former starter Vontaze Burfict but offers similar physicality and intensity.
12. Green Bay Packers – T.J. Hockenson, TE, Iowa
There likely is no truth to the rumor that the Packers were offering tryouts to Lambeau stadium vendors as reliable pass-catchers to complement Davante Adams but the tight ends and receivers on the roster weren’t offering much help. Hockenson can be the safety blanket (and so much more) that Aaron Rodgers has been missing.
13. Miami Dolphins – Dwayne Haskins, QB, Ohio State
The Dolphins current QB depth chart consists of Ryan Fitzpatrick, Luke Falk and Jake Rudock. If they do not select a QB here (or trade for Rosen), at least they’ll make projecting which team and position is likely to go No. 1 in 2020 easy for draft analysts. Haskins is no Tom Brady but he is a gutty, rhythm passer with good accuracy to the short and intermediate levels, which new head coach Brian Flores should appreciate.
14. Atlanta Falcons –Montez Sweat, DE, Mississippi State
Sweat’s medical red-flags could scare off some but I have a hard time envisioning him getting out of the top 15 – and can you imagine his speed off the edge across from Vic Beasley with Grady Jarrett attacking up the middle? Yeah, so can Dan Quinn.
15. Washington Redskins – Daniel Jones, QB, Duke
Quite frankly, I’m not as high on Jones as most. I do not have a first round grade on him due to his average arm strength. He clearly possesses the size, mobility and I.Q. to be successful, however, and is a clean schematic fit in Jay Gruden’s offense. With Alex Smith ailing, the Redskins are as desperate for QB help as anyone.
16. Carolina Panthers – Jonah Williams, OT, Alabama
The Panthers’ top brass traveled the country to see all of the top OTs work out this spring. They are taking a tackle and if Williams – the best offensive lineman in this draft – is still available, GM Marty Hurney (not to mention Cam Newton) should be dancing.
17. New York Giants – Marquise Brown, WR, Oklahoma
How does one replace a dynamic talent like OBJ? Draft a pass-catcher who is even faster. Hollywood meets Broadway.
18. Minnesota Vikings – Andre Dillard, OT, Washington State
A bit passive, Dillard isn’t a fit for everyone but he possesses the best feet of any tackle in this draft class, which is exactly what Kirk Cousins needs to begin living up to his massive contract.
19. Tennessee Titans – Brian Burns, OLB, Florida State
Like the Falcons with Sweat, the idea of pairing the bendy Burns with Harold Landry and Jurrell Casey has to be an exciting thought for Titans’ fans.
20. Pittsburgh Steelers – Andraez “Greedy” Williams, CB, LSU
The Steelers have historically prioritized physicality and technique over speed and raw athleticism at cornerback but that has not translated into success in the defensive backfield in recent years. Williams needs to show more commitment in run support but his height, speed and balls-kills are Pro Bowl caliber.
21. Seattle Seahawks – Johnathan Abram, S, Mississippi State
Projecting the Seahawks to pick here may be a waste of time as the club has traded its first pick (either to move down or for a veteran) the past seven years. What’s more, the team currently has just four selections this year. Abrams possesses the speed and physicality this club prioritizes, however, and safety is a position of concern.
22. Baltimore Ravens – Clelin Ferrell, DE, Clemson
Ferrell may lack the quick-twitch of some of this year’s other top edge rushers but his physicality, length and production makes him exactly the type of player former Ravens’ GM Ozzie Newsome would have loved. It will be fun to see if Eric DeCosta takes a similar approach on draft day.
23. Houston Texans – Kaleb McGary, OT, Washington
The Texans’ offensive line was a mess last season and given that young star Deshaun Watson has already missed half of one season due to injury, improving up front should be a top priority. McGary is as pro-ready as this class gets at offensive tackle with the size, athleticism and toughness to project as a plug and play starter at right tackle.
24. Oakland Raiders – Noah Fant, TE, Iowa
Given how productive Jared Cook was last year for the Raiders, it seems obvious that the club will be looking to add reinforcements to the position now that he’s in New Orleans. Fant is an even better athlete and provides terrific value here.
25. Philadelphia Eagles – Nasir Adderley, S, Delaware
Not every club has the guts to invest a first round pick in an FCS player like Adderley but taken a proven commodity like him at 25 is much tamer than investing the No. 2 overall selection in Carson Wentz or letting a Super Bowl MVP like Nick Foles walk away. Adderley possesses an ideal blend of size, range, tackling ability and ball-skills.
26. Indianapolis Colts – Christian Wilkins, DT, Clemson
In most drafts, Wilkins would probably go in the top 10-15 but he could slide a bit this year as teams foolishly give too much credit to the other dominant players on Clemson’s defensive line and overlook his polished game. Chris Ballard and his Colts staff were big winners a year ago in the draft and would be starting off beautifully this time, as well, if Wilkins fell into their lap.
27. Oakland Raiders – Cody Ford, OL, Oklahoma
After the way Dalton Risner competed his tail off for Jon Gruden and the Raiders at the Senior Bowl, I wanted to place him here. Ford is the better athlete, however. Each possesses the positional versatility to pay immediate dividends.
28. Los Angeles Chargers – Parris Campbell, WR, Ohio State
Finding a more dynamic weapon to pair with Keenan Allen (and Hunter Henry) as pass-catchers could provide the jolt the Chargers need to spark a predictable offense and disinterested LA fanbase. Campbell, a two-time team captain with electric speed would be a fun fit.
29. Kansas City Chiefs – Deandre Baker, CB, Georgia
Baker isn’t the biggest or fastest of this year’s defensive backs but he is as battle-tested and tenacious as it gets. For a club destined to be playing in lots of shoot-outs, the reigning Thorpe Award winner would seem to make a lot of sense – especially with the top pass rushers off the board.
30. Green Bay Packers – Josh Jacobs, RB, Alabama
Along with Hockenson, Jacobs would provide the Packers – and more specifically Aaron Rodgers – plenty of reason to be rejuvenated. Jacobs lacks elite breakaway speed but has everything else needed to be a true franchise back, including soft hands, physicality as a blocker and toughness.
31. Los Angeles Rams – Byron Murphy, CB, Washington
Too talented to fall out of the first round, Murphy would provide the Rams with terrific depth at cornerback behind the gifted (but not exactly reliable) Marcus Peters and Aqib Talib. Like the Chiefs, the Rams would be wise to keep adding to their defense.
32. New England Patriots –Dexter Lawrence, DT, Clemson
Like Murphy one pick earlier, Lawrence is just too talented to slip out of the top 32 and no one would fill a bigger hole in the middle for the Patriots.
April 19, 2019 at 5:45 pm in reply to: 2019 NFL draft big Boards & Mocks & other all-purpose draft stuff #100098
znModeratorPlenty of intrigue and uncertainty in this upcoming 1st round of the draft. But these are 24 prospects I believe will be a part of the top 32: https://t.co/rgMRDheyYn
— Jason La Canfora (@JasonLaCanfora) April 19, 2019
April 19, 2019 at 5:44 pm in reply to: 2019 NFL draft big Boards & Mocks & other all-purpose draft stuff #100097
znModeratorDaniel Jeremiah 2019 NFL mock draft 3.0: Drew Lock to Packers
Daniel Jeremiah
With the 2019 NFL Draft just a little more than a week away, here’s my third look at how teams will draft when Round 1 begins in Nashville, Tennessee, on April 25.
To see every draft pick each team holds in the 2019 NFL Draft, click here.
PICK 1 Kyler Murray – QB
School: Oklahoma | Year: Junior (RS)I’m not as confident as I once was that Murray will be the pick here because of all the team visits Murray is taking, but I still think he ends up being Arizona’s selection.
PICK 2 Nick Bosa – Edge
School: Ohio State | Year: JuniorThere’s a lot of talk about Quinnen Williams going to San Francisco with this pick. I don’t think the Niners could go wrong with either him or Bosa.
PICK 3 Ed Oliver – DT
School: Houston | Year: JuniorGregg Williams coached Aaron Donald during his time as Rams DC and could easily find a way to utilize Oliver in the Big Apple.
PICK 4 Quinnen Williams – DT
School: Alabama | Year: Sophomore (RS)With needs all over the field, the Raiders should take the best player available.
PICK 5 Josh Allen – Edge
School: Kentucky | Year: SeniorI could see this as a trade-down spot if a team wants to move up for a QB. However, if the Bucs stay here and Allen is still available, he’d be too tempting to pass up.
PICK 6 Daniel Jones – QB
School: Duke | Year: Junior (RS)If the Giants want a QB, it makes more sense to secure him at No. 6 than leave it to fate and wait until they’re on the clock again at No. 17.
PICK 7 Jawaan Taylor – OT
School: Florida | Year: JuniorTaylor is a DNA match with how the Jaguars want to play. He’s a physical player.
PICK 8 Jonah Williams – OG
School: Alabama | Year: JuniorDetroit has spent a lot of draft capital on the offensive line, but I could see the Lions going back to the well one more time.
PICK 9 T.J. Hockenson – TE
School: Iowa | Year: Sophomore (RS)Hockenson would quickly emerge as the best friend of Josh Allen and LeSean McCoy. He helps in both the passing and running games.
PICK10 Devin White – LB
School: LSU | Year: JuniorI know the Broncos have done a lot of homework on the quarterbacks in this draft, but I just can’t envision them taking a QB here before they get a chance to see what Joe Flacco looks like in this offense. Instead, they go with the top LB available.
PICK 11 Dwayne Haskins – QB
School: Ohio State | Year: Sophomore (RS)New coach and a new era at QB. Haskins would create a spark in an organization that desperately needs one.
PICK 12 Devin Bush – LB
School: Michigan | Year: JuniorI think Bush could go much earlier than many people expect due to the combination of his talent and the lack of depth at his position.
PICK 13 Rashan Gary – Edge
School: Michigan | Year: JuniorThe Dolphins did not pick an offensive or defensive lineman last year. This draft will be heavy in both for them.
PICK 14 Greedy Williams – CB
School: LSU | Year: Sophomore (RS)The Falcons need an upgrade in their secondary. Williams offers an intriguing mix of size and playmaking ability.
PICK 15 Brian Burns – Edge
School: Florida State | Year: JuniorI still have Washington as the likely landing spot for Josh Rosen, which would take the ‘Skins out of the quarterback derby. So, their pass rush took a hit with the departure of Preston Smith. Enter Burns.
PICK 16 Andre Dillard – OT
School: Washington State | Year: Senior (RS)I can’t see Dillard going much later than this spot. Carolina needs help on the O-line.
PICK 17 Montez Sweat – Edge
School: Mississippi State | Year: SeniorThe Giants end up with their edge rusher and quarterback — but in the opposite order from what’s been expected. Sweat could go later than some anticipate.
PICK 18 Garrett Bradbury – C
School: N.C. State | Year: Senior (RS)Bradbury was made to play in this Gary Kubiak-style offense. The Vikings will move Pat Elflein to guard to clear a spot for the rookie at center.
PICK 19 Christian Wilkins – DT
School: Clemson | Year: SeniorWilkins will help the interior pass rush and be a perfect complement to Jurrell Casey.
PICK 20 Lonnie Johnson Jr. – CB
School: Kentucky | Year: SeniorThis is higher than I have Johnson rated, but he’s catching a lot of buzz right now and the Steelers have a need at the position.
PICK 21 Jeffery Simmons – DT
School: Mississippi State | Year: JuniorHe did suffer an ACL tear in February, but I would not be surprised if, five years from now, Simmons is viewed as the best player from this draft class.
PICK 22 Clelin Ferrell – Edge
School: Clemson | Year: Junior (RS)Ferrell fits Baltimore’s profile. He’s physical, tough and has a high floor.
PICK 23 Cody Ford – OT
School: Oklahoma | Year: Junior (RS)With their pass-protection woes, the Texans have to take the best available offensive lineman.
PICK 24 Noah Fant- TE
School: Iowa | Year: JuniorFant would be an upgrade over Jared Cook, the tight end they just lost in free agency.
PICK 25 Marquise Brown – WR
School: Oklahoma | Year: JuniorIt would make sense for the Eagles to add a receiver because I don’t think DeSean Jackson’s a long-term solution and they could lose Nelson Agholor next year, as he’s due to hit free agency.
PICK 26 Johnathan Abram – S
School: Mississippi State | Year: SeniorSelfishly, I would just love to see him play opposite Malik Hooker in Indy. Abram could play in the box and allow Hooker to make plays over the top.
PICK 27 Chris Lindstrom – OG
School: Boston College | Year: SeniorGM Mike Mayock gets a year pass on donating to his alma mater by taking a fellow Eagle! All jokes aside, Lindstrom is highly regarded and has a good chance of being picked in the 20s of Round 1.
PICK 28 Rock Ya-Sin – CB
School: Temple | Year: SeniorThere are other needs here — safety and defensive tackle among them — but it was apparent that the Bolts need to add some talent on the outside based on their performance against the Patriots in the Divisional Round of last season’s playoffs.
PICK 29 Byron Murphy – CB
School: Washington | Year: Sophomore (RS)This would be a no-brainer. Kansas City takes the best defensive back still available and gets good value.
PICK 30 Drew Lock – QB
School: Missouri | Year: SeniorThe Packers have been doing a lot of homework on quarterbacks this draft season. They once spent a first-round pick on a QB who’d become the eventual replacement for a 35-year-old future Hall of Famer, and they repeat history here.
PICK 31 Elgton Jenkins – OG
School: Mississippi State | Year: Senior (RS)Jenkins is another player who’s made his way into the first-round conversation. Teams love his strength and power inside. He can play any of the three interior positions.
PICK 32 Dexter Lawrence – DT
School: Clemson | Year: JuniorWhile the rest of the league moves away from massive DTs like Lawrence, the Patriots see the value in a dominant run defender who can push the pocket on passing downs.
April 19, 2019 at 5:44 pm in reply to: 2019 NFL draft big Boards & Mocks & other all-purpose draft stuff #100096
znModeratorApril 19, 2019 at 5:43 pm in reply to: 2019 NFL draft big Boards & Mocks & other all-purpose draft stuff #100095
znModerator
znModeratorGreg Gabriel@greggabe
Talked to a GM who said that the first 12-15 players in the draft are solid. The next 20-25 are basically at the same talent level meaning if that’s where you’re picking then a need player might be best available playerRyanKartje@Ryan_Kartje
The Rams haven’t spent a high pick on defense in quite some time. That looks bound to change in this draft:
znModeratorIan Rapoport@RapSheet
Sources: #Raiders coach Jon Gruden and GM Mike Mayock sent their scouts home for the weekend and they are not expected to return by draft time. The belief is they don’t know who to trust and wanted to clear the room.Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
Expectation has been that much of the scouting department would be turned over post-draft. Looks like word being out there on it led Mayock, Gruden, and Co. to close ranks.Adam Caplan@caplannfl
There will be significant changes to scouting staff after the draft, so this makes sense to keep those guys out. Happens around the NFL each season (pro personnel director was let go months ago already).Gil Brandt@Gil_Brandt
We never cleared the room but sometimes we’d lay traps for scouts we didn’t trust. In 1987 we showed our board to a scout with us taking Mike Junkin, a LB we didn’t like. Two days later, Cowboys beat writer Jim Dent wrote story saying we were taking Junkin.Hook, line, stinker.
znModeratorNeed further proof that @AaronDonald97 is a beast?
2018 stats that AD ranked Top-10 in:
– Defensive Grade (1st)
– Run Defense Grade (3rd)
– Pass Rush Grade (2nd)
– Pressures (1st)
– Sacks (1st)
– QB Hits (T-3rd)
– Hurries (1st)
– Tackles for Loss (T-8th)
– Forced Fumbles (T-6th) pic.twitter.com/v8GymOn9sD— PFF LA Rams (@PFF_Rams) April 19, 2019
znModeratorTony Softli@SoftliSEA
Ravens owner contributes $100K toward rebuilding historically black churches burned in arson
znModeratorMike Renner@PFF_Mike
TE is one of the most difficult positions to scout because:1. usage is so important
2. they have such small sample sizes in collegeNoah Fant and T.J. Hockenson had fewer targets their entire college careers than Travis Kelce and Zach Ertz had all last season
Jim Nagy@JimNagy_SB
The cost of representing players has gotten out-of-control for agents. Stories about players taking advantage of agents can be huge turn-offs for NFL teams. Many players scare-off teams by being high-maintenance. #truth
znModeratorThe Mueller report: What you need to know
Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s highly anticipated report presents a sweeping narrative of Russia’s 2016 election interference and clears the Trump campaign of criminally conspiring with the Kremlin. It also details the president’s efforts to curtail the nearly two-year probe, though Mueller declined to say whether or not Trump’s conduct amounted to illegal obstruction.
The report reaffirms the intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia favored Trump over Hillary Clinton, and notes that the Trump campaign believed it would benefit on Election Day from Moscow’s interference.
But Mueller found the Kremlin’s acts on Trump’s behalf and numerous contacts between the campaign and Russia didn’t rise to the level of criminal conspiracy or coordination. These contacts comprise the report’s first volume, which is heavily redacted in some sections, mostly owing to its use of material that relates to cases still being pursued by other prosecutors.
In the report’s second volume, Mueller’s team documented 10 instances of Trump trying to impede the investigation or directing his staff to do so (including firing Mueller). Ultimately, Mueller chose not to say whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice.
Mueller: There were numerous contacts, but no criminal conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia
Mueller found the Trump campaign did not engage in a criminal conspiracy or illegal coordination with Russia.The special counsel’s decision not to charge Trump with conspiracy came despite what Mueller described as a series of “salient moments” over the 2016 election season and presidential transition — which will be familiar to those who have followed the investigation.
Mueller confirmed that the triggering event for the FBI opening a counterintelligence investigation into links between the Trump campaign and the Russian government came as a result of an April 2016 meeting between campaign adviser George Papadopoulos and a source who said Russian government officials could offer “dirt” on Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails.”
The report also recounts the June 9, 2016, meeting at Trump Tower that Donald Trump Jr. arranged based on a promise that a “Russian government attorney” would supply the campaign with incriminating evidence against Clinton as part of the Kremlin’s support for his father’s candidacy.
Mueller also notes that Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort shared internal polling data with his long-time business associate Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI has linked to Russian intelligence, and discussed with Kilimnik the campaign’s strategy for winning over Democratic voters in the Midwest.
At least some of these contacts occurred while Trump pursued Trump Tower Moscow deal and publicly espoused pro-Russian policies.
Nonetheless, Mueller found the series of links and alignment of interests did not amount to a criminal conspiracy or illegal coordination.
“Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts,” Mueller’s report states, “the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
Mueller did not reach a conclusion about whether Trump obstructed
Mueller declined to say if Trump had obstructed justice. Attorney General Barr and the deputy attorney general concluded Trump had not.
The special counsel explained that the unusual circumstances surrounding the probe made it difficult to issue a traditional binary judgment about whether to indict. But Mueller’s reluctance to reach a prosecutorial conclusion should not be interpreted as an exoneration of the president on the issue of obstruction, he said.
“The evidence we obtained about the president’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred,” Mueller said. “Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
After Mueller declined to reach a conclusion about obstruction, Barr stepped in.
In a move that left legal experts divided, Barr reasoned that Mueller’s silence “leaves it to the attorney general to determine” if Trump obstructed justice. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded the president had not done so.
Trump’s efforts to curtail the investigation
Though Trump will not be charged with obstruction of justice during his presidency, Mueller’s report paints a searing portrait of Trump’s attempts to hamper investigators.
Mueller lists some 10 “key issues and events” that his team examined as part of its obstruction investigation. Some of the events had been previously reported in the press, while other conduct has been made public for the first time through Mueller’s report.
The special counsel’s team probed events that James Comey has testified about before Congress, including Trump’s request to then-FBI Director Comey that he drop the investigation into Trump’s embattled former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who has since pled guilty to lying to the FBI.
Mueller also investigated other highly publicized events, like Trump’s firing of Comey, and the president’s involvement in crafting a misleading statement on his son’s behalf regarding the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting.
But the report also provides a window into Trump’s distress over the news that a special counsel had been appointed in the wake of Comey’s firing.
“Oh my God. This is terrible,” the report quotes Trump as saying. “This is the end of my presidency. I’m f—–.”
Trump grew more alarmed following media reports that the special counsel’s office would look into whether Trump obstructed justice, according to the report.
It describes a frantic Trump calling then-White House counsel Don McGahn at home and ordering him to say Mueller should be removed due to conflicts of interest. McGahn refused.
“The president’s efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful,” the Mueller report notes, “but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the president declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests.”
April 19, 2019 at 1:34 am in reply to: Rams decisions on Goff coming up (extension? 5th year option?) #100070
znModerator2020 Fifth-Year Option Decision Tracker
https://www.profootballrumors.com/2019/04/2020-fifth-year-option-decision-tracker
Teams across the NFL have until May 2 to officially pick up their 2020 options on players who are entering the final year of their rookie contracts. These fifth-year options can only be exercised on first-round picks, and the salaries are determined by where players were drafted and what position they play.
If a player has his option exercised, his rookie contract will be extended by one year and he’ll be eligible for unrestricted free agency in 2021, after the conclusion of the 2020 season. If a player’s option is declined, he’ll be eligible to hit the open market a year earlier. Of course, if a 2016 first-rounder is no longer on his rookie contract, there will be no option to exercise or decline. We explained the intricacies of the fifth-year option in a PFR Glossary post, so you can read up on the specific details there.
Soon, we’ll learn the official salary figures for all 2020 fifth-year options. What we do know is that the option salaries for top 10 picks is equal to the transition tender at the player’s position during his fourth season. So, because the transition tag for quarterbacks this year was $22.783MM, we already know that Jared Goff and Carson Wentz‘s fifth-year option will be worth that amount.
With next month’s deadline looming, we’ll use the space below to track all the option decisions from around the league based on various reports and official announcements. Here are this season’s fifth-year option decisions so far:
Jared Goff, QB, $22.783MM (Rams):
Carson Wentz, QB, $22.783MM (Eagles):
Joey Bosa, DE, $14.360MM (Chargers):
Ezekiel Elliott, RB, $9.099MM (Cowboys): To be exercised
Jalen Ramsey, CB, $13.703MM (Jaguars): To be exercised
Ronnie Stanley, T, $12.866MM (Ravens):
DeForest Buckner, DT, $12.378MM (49ers):
Jack Conklin, T, $12.866MM (Titans):
Leonard Floyd, LB, $13.222MM (Bears): To be exercised
Eli Apple, CB, $13.703MM (Saints):
Vernon Hargreaves, CB (Buccaneers):
Sheldon Rankins, DT (Saints):
Laremy Tunsil, T (Dolphins):Exercised
Karl Joseph, S (Raiders): Likely to be exercised
Corey Coleman, WR (Giants): Not applicable due to release
Taylor Decker, T (Lions):
Keanu Neal, S (Falcons): To be exercised
Ryan Kelly, C (Colts):
Shaq Lawson, DE (Bills):
Darron Lee, LB (Jets):
Will Fuller, WR (Texans):
Josh Doctson, WR (Redskins):
Laquon Treadwell, WR (Vikings):
William Jackson, CB (Bengals):
Artie Burns, CB (Steelers):
Paxton Lynch, QB (Seahawks): Not applicable due to release
Kenny Clark, DT (Packers):
Joshua Garnett, G (49ers):
Patriots forfeited pick as result of Deflategate scandal
Robert Nkemdiche, DT (Cardinals):
Vernon Butler, DT (Panthers):
Germain Ifedi, T (Seahawks):
znModeratorThe Mueller report is definitive: Russia meddled in the election to help Trump win
The 448-page report clears up any doubt that Russian efforts had one goal in mind: electing Trump.On Thursday, the release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report removed any remaining doubt that Russia’s interference campaign was designed to help elect Donald Trump and keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House.
While some parts of the report are still redacted, the investigation uncovered some especially damning details on how Russia’s social media interference operations attempted to push Trump to the presidency. The report went into granular detail about how Russian hackers stole and disseminated Democratic party emails, which were released at the perfect time to help boost the Trump campaign.
The special counsel in its report wrote about Russia’s Internet Research Agency (IRA) that “[t]hroughout 2016, IRA accounts published an increasing number of materials supporting the Trump Campaign and opposing the Clinton Campaign.” In one section, describing the IRA’s methodologies, Mueller’s report found that by early 2016 the group had focused on “supporting the Trump Campaign and disparaging candidate Hillary Clinton.”

Later on, the Mueller report identified specific internal IRA emails to back up the investigators’ findings. One, from February 2016, “referred to support for the Trump Campaign and opposition to candidate Clinton.” While some of the details remain redacted, one related passage reads that the IRA should “se any opportunity to criticize Hillary [Clinton] and the rest (except [Bernie] Sanders and Trump — we support them).” Mueller’s team even found that the IRA had been disparaging Clinton even prior to her presidential campaign, focusing on “Clinton’s record as Secretary of State and… various critiques of her candidacy.”

When some of the fake Russian social media accounts proved insufficiently anti-Clinton, they were reprimanded by their higher-ups. An internal IRA review found that one notorious fake Russian Facebook page, “Secured Borders,” had not posted enough anti-Clinton material. The author of the review, according to Mueller’s report, “criticized the ‘lower number of posts dedicated to criticizing Hillary Clinton’ and reminded the [IRA’s] Facebook specialist ‘it is imperative to intensify criticizing Hillary Clinton.’”
And it wasn’t just posts, but ads as well. Mueller’s team found that “IRA-purchased [Facebook] advertisements featuring Clinton were, with very few exceptions, negative.”
The Mueller report even identified multiple connections between the IRA and the Trump campaign, including when members of the Trump campaign — and even Trump himself, as ThinkProgress was the first to report — retweeted fake Russian accounts. However, Mueller’s investigation “identified no similar connections between the IRA and the Clinton Campaign.”
The hacking campaigns, of course, explicitly targeted Clinton’s campaign. One of the sections in Mueller’s report is explicitly titled “GRU Hacking Directed at the Clinton Campaign,” noting the Russian military intelligence agency behind the hacking campaign. While much of the information parallels details put forth in prior indictments against the Russians responsible, the Mueller report specifically notes that the GRU “hacked the computers and email accounts of organizations, employees, and volunteers supporting the Clinton Campaign” — including targeting “hundreds of email accounts used by Clinton Campaign employees, advisors, and volunteers.”
“The release of the documents was designed and timed to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election and undermine the Clinton Campaign,” the report notes.

And in regards to timing, Mueller’s report found that Russian hackers specifically targeted new individuals linked to the Clinton campaign almost immediately after Trump in July 2016 called for Russia to “find the 30,000 [Clinton] emails that are missing.” As the Mueller report read, “Within approximately five hours of Trump’s statement, GRU officers targeted for the first time Clinton’s personal office…. The investigation did not find evidence of earlier GRU attempts to compromise accounts hosted on this [Clinton-related] domain. It is unclear how the GRU was able to identify these email accounts, which were not public.”
The entire report puts to bed to the notion that those behind Russia’s interference efforts — both on the social media front and those responsible for hacking — targeted both the Trump and Clinton campaigns equally, or that they were interested solely in sowing division for the sake of spreading chaos. As Mueller’s report makes clear, the social media operators and officials behind the hacking and dissemination, especially in 2016, did so with one goal in mind: electing Trump, and preventing Clinton from reaching the White House.
In that regard, they considered their efforts to have been successful. As the report highlighted, the day after Trump’s victory a redacted source wrote to one of the Russian officials involved in outreach to the incoming Trump administration.
Wrote the redacted source, “Putin has won.”
znModeratorHow William Barr misled the public about Mueller’s decision not to charge Trump
Deceit wrapped in rank partisanship.From the moment news broke that special counsel Robert Mueller completed his report on the Russian government’s efforts to boost President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, Attorney General William Barr appeared determined to protect Trump from political fallout — and to mislead reporters and the American people about what Mueller’s report said and whether Mueller suggested that Trump violated the law.
In his summary of Mueller’s report, and in subsequent statements to the press, Barr made carefully worded statements that conveyed a misleading impression that Mueller concluded that Trump’s actions were not criminal. The reality is much more complicated.
Mueller leaned heavily on a longstanding Justice Department policy against indicting a sitting president in his decision not to charge Trump. Mueller also strongly implies in his report that impeachment and removal from office may be the appropriate sanction for Trump’s actions.
The report is divided into two volumes. The first largely concerns his investigation into Russia’s efforts to impact the election and lays out why he decided to charge specific individuals with crimes. The second volume primarily concerns Trump’s efforts to thwart an investigation into Russia’s efforts to bolster Trump’s campaign. It also explains why Mueller ultimately decided not to charge Trump.
In his letter summarizing the report, Barr states that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that the evidence compiled by Mueller “is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense,” and that this determination was made “without regard to . . . the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.” A pair of memos by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), which lays out the basis for the policy against charging a sitting president, claims that doing so would be unconstitutional.
At a press conference on Thursday morning, Barr further downplayed the role of the OLC memos in Mueller’s decision not to charge Trump. “We specifically asked him about the OLC opinion and whether or not he was taking a position that he would have found a crime but for the existence of the OLC opinion,” Barr told the press, claiming that Mueller “was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.”
On the contrary, Mueller’s report explicitly states that the OLC’s opinions played a significant role in his decision not to charge Trump. Mueller opens the second volume of a report with a list of four “considerations that guided our obstruction-of-justice investigation.” Here is the first:
[A] traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that “the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions” in violation of “the constitutional separation of powers.” Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, this Office accepted OLC’s legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC’s constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President’s capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.
Two parts of this statement (bolded above) are worth emphasizing. The first is Mueller’s explicit statement that, as a Justice Department attorney, he believed he was bound by OLC’s conclusion that an indictment of a sitting president is unconstitutional.
The second is Mueller’s somewhat cryptic reference to “constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.” The primary process that the Constitution contemplates for dealing with a criminal president is impeachment, conviction, and removal from office by the Congress. Thus, Mueller appears to be suggesting that, in addition to believing that he lacked authority to charge a sitting president, such an indictment could interfere with a Congressional investigation into Trump’s actions, and into possible impeachment proceedings.
Mueller, moreover, is quite explicit about the fact that he did not conclude that Trump is innocent. “If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state,” the special counsel writes. “Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.”
In a painful irony, Mueller also explains that he decided not to charge Trump due to the very same fairness concerns that should have kept Trump from becoming president in the first place. “Fairness concerns counseled against” concluding that Trump committed a crime, “when no charges can be brought.”
That’s because “the ordinary means for an individual to respond to an accusation is through a speedy and public trial, with all the procedural protections that surround a criminal case.” Yet, because Trump is immune from prosecution under DOJ policy while he remains president, Trump may not “use that process to seek to clear his name.” Thus, to accuse Trump of a crime without bringing him to trial would have the effect of punishing him without affording him due process, because the mere allegation against a sitting president would carry political consequences.
The same concerns counseled against former FBI Director James Comey’s decision to publicly impugn Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s character during the 2016 election. As I wrote at the time,
The Justice Department’s longstanding policy of not disclosing information that could influence an election is very much an extension of our constitutional structure. The Constitution imposes escalating burdens of proof on the government in order to prevent the state from bringing its force to bear against someone who has not be shown to be guilty of any crime. And the Justice Department’s policy serves this same goal.
As [former Deputy Attorneys General Jamie] Gorelick and [Larry] Thompson explain, DOJ policy exists to “avoid misuse of prosecutorial power by creating unfair innuendo to which an accused party cannot properly respond.” The New Yorker’s Jane Meyer quotes an unnamed former senior Justice Department official making a similar point. A disclosure like the one Comey made on Friday “impugns the integrity and reputation of the candidate, even though there’s no finding by a court, or in this instance even an indictment.”
Had Comey showed the same integrity — and the same respect for our constitutional structure — that Mueller showed in his report, it is likely that Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 election and Russia’s efforts to shape that election would have failed.
znModeratorMark Craig@markcraignfl
Something to keep in mind if you’re pouring through those NFL schedules and already assigning Ws and Ls based on last year’s performances: For 29 straight years now, the NFL has had at least four teams make the playoffs that didn’t make it the year before. Including seven last yrProFootballTalk@ProFootballTalk
With early trips to Cleveland and Seattle and a pre-Thanksgiving trip to Pittsburgh, Rams may avoid any cold-weather games in 2019RamsNewsNow@RamsNewsNow
Rams seeking ‘redshirt’ O-linemen in draft, not surefire Day 1 startersRams open as early favorites over Panthers in Week 1
Rams will travel 2nd-most miles in NFL next season
Ryan Kartje@Ryan_Kartje
Rams don’t need much on offense in the draft, but reinforcements on the offensive line are a must
znModeratorTyreek Hill temporarily lost custody of his three-year-old son amid allegations of abuse https://t.co/DszOvhvvwb
— The MMQB (@theMMQB) April 18, 2019
znModerator9-minute clip here feat. ex #Packers exec @AndrewBrandt telling story of how Green Bay's draft room was far from settled on Aaron Rodgers in 2005, and later how Mike McCarthy broke news to Brett Favre that the org had "moved on" in 2008: https://t.co/K5tCdsXgwC
— Evan Silva (@evansilva) April 18, 2019
—
JG@JoeGoodberry
They had Rodgers as the ONLY remaining first round grade on the board and the Offensive coaches begged them not to draft Rodgers.
znModeratorFull Raiders schedule leaked
Wk1: Loss
Wk2: Loss
Wk3: Loss
Wk4: Moral Victory
Wk5: Loss
Wk6: Bye (Loss)
Wk7: Loss
Wk8: Accidental win
Wk9: Loss
Wk10: Moral Victory
Wk11: Loss
Wk12: Win no one expects
Wk13: Loss
Wk14: Loss
Wk15: Win that ruins draft position
Wk16: Loss
Wk17: Loss— NOTSportsCenter (@NOTSportsCenter) April 17, 2019
-
AuthorPosts

