Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 20,221 through 20,250 (of 47,639 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams take OLB Terrell Lewis at 84 #117324
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets & things … 6/26 thru 6/30 #117323
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Just a thread for different kindsa interesting things #117321
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ==

    in reply to: tweets & things … 6/26 thru 6/30 #117319
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Rams’ Week 14 matchup with Patriots just got tougher thanks to Cam Newton
    Rams' Week 14 matchup with Patriots just got tougher thanks to Cam Newton

    The Rams are familiar with his game, barely edging out a win over the Panthers in Week 1 last season – one of only two games Newton played in 2019. He only carried it three times for minus-2 yards, but he did complete 25 of his 38 passes for 239 yards. Newton wasn’t 100% healthy at any point last year, but he still gave the Panthers their best chance to win.

    in reply to: SARS-C0V-2 vaccine & what we know about immunity #117318
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/28/health/fauci-coronavirus-vaccine-contact-tracing-aspen/index.html

    A CNN poll last month found one-third of Americans said they would not try to get vaccinated against Covid, even if the vaccine is widely available and low cost.

    In an interview Friday, CNN asked Fauci whether a vaccine with 70% to 75% efficacy taken by only two-thirds of the population would provide herd immunity to the coronavirus.

    “No — unlikely,” he answered.

    Fauci noted that “there is a general anti-science, anti-authority, anti-vaccine feeling among some people in this country — an alarmingly large percentage of people, relatively speaking.”

    He said given the power of the anti-vaccine movement, “we have a lot of work to do” to educate people on the truth about vaccines.

    “It’s not going to be easy,” he said. “Anyone [who] thinks it will be easy is not facing reality. It’s going to be very difficult.”

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Here are the top 12, including both official and unofficial stats. I do career sacks, not just sacks with the Rams.

    Deacon Jones – 173.5
    Kevin Greene – 160
    Jack Youngblood – 151.5
    Coy Bacon – 130
    Kevin Carter – 104.5
    Fred Dryer – 103
    Merlin Olsen – 94
    Leonard Little – 87.5
    Robert Quinn – 80.5
    Larry Brooks – 74.5
    Aaron Donald – 72
    Chris Long – 70

    ==

    LMU93

    also look at sacks per game…

    1. Deacon Jones- 0.908
    2. Aaron Donald- 0.766
    3. Jack Youngblood- 0.75
    4. Robert Quinn- 0.658
    5. Kevin Carter- 0.651
    6. Kevin Greene- 0.609
    7. Leonard Little- 0.595
    8. Gary Jeter- 0.570
    9. Leslie O’Neal- 0.548
    10. Larry Brooks- 0.523

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    More than half a million die from Covid-19 globally. Dust cloud lingers in parts of US. New protests push for police accountability.

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/28/politics/floyd-police-reform-unlikely/index.html

    (CNN)The dramatic images rocked the nation — hundreds of thousands of people from all races taking to the streets across the United States, demanding an end to excessive police force against people of color.

    What began as local outrage in response to George Floyd’s death following an encounter with Minneapolis police officers soon spread throughout the country.
    From coast to coast, demonstrators chanting “Black lives matter” and “no justice, no peace” united in hundreds of mostly peaceful protests, some risking their own safety. They found themselves tear gassed near the White House, allegedly assaulted by police in New York City, and shoved to the pavement by tactical teams in Buffalo.
    Despite the personal risk, their voices were heard by fellow citizens and politicians alike, as demonstrators sparked a protest movement unlike anything the country has seen since the 1960s.

    Partisan politics appears to have derailed any meaningful near-term reform.

    Failure at the epicenter

    In Minnesota, Floyd’s death — caught on camera by a bystander as a White police officer kneeled on Floyd’s neck until he lost consciousness — sparked a reform movement. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz responded by calling a special session of the state’s legislature to address emergency policing reform measures.
    Walz said reform measures would be aimed at police violence, grants for rebuilding local infrastructure, accountability and transparency.
    But legislators had little to show for their efforts. Partisan entrenchment ruled the day, as the Republican-controlled Senate and Democratic-led House clashed over nearly two-dozen policing reform measures.
    House Democratic efforts to end warrior-type training for officers, instill residency requirements for police officers, ban choke holds and institute voting rights for felons grinded to a halt as Senate Republicans responded with more narrow reforms.
    Despite widespread calls for reform, the special legislative session came up empty handed.
    “The people of Minnesota should certainly be deeply disappointed,” Walz said, visibly upset. “This is a failure to move things, a failure to engage. It seems like there’s a tendency in legislative bodies to place blame on everyone else.”
    In Minneapolis, where the city council continues to address policing reform, grand visions for change appear devoid of specifics and are far from being enacted anytime soon.
    “We’re committed to dismantling police as we know it in the city of Minneapolis and to rebuild with our community, a new model of public safety that actually keeps our communities safe,” Lisa Bender, the city council president, told me earlier this month on CNN’s “Newsroom.”
    On Friday the city council voted unanimously to replace the Minneapolis police department with a new entity focused on “community safety and violence prevention.” The measure, however, still requires additional input from other city leaders and, ultimately, voters in November.
    A federal failure
    Minnesota lawmakers were not alone in their failure to overcome partisan politics and pass immediate, meaningful legislation.
    In the US Senate last week, the chamber’s Democratic minority successfully blocked GOP policing reform legislation they deemed inadequate. Democrats sought provisions banning the use of choke holds by police departments, which some cities around the country have unilaterally adopted. They also wanted provisions overhauling qualified immunity, a legal mechanism that largely shields police officers from civil law suits.
    “(The GOP) bill is a half-assed bill that doesn’t do what we should be doing, which is doing honest police reform,” said Sen. Mazie Hirono, a Hawaii Democrat.
    In the House, Democrats passed their own version of sweeping police reform on Thursday. The measure calls for limiting qualified immunity for police officers, prohibiting racial profiling and banning choke holds.
    Despite the bill’s passage on a largely party-line vote, the Senate is not expected to consider it, and President Donald Trump isn’t likely to throw his support behind Democratic legislation championed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

    ‘Encouragement’ over ‘enforcement’

    For its part, the White House attempted to exert a leadership role in the national policing debate, but an executive order signed by Trump earlier this month has been criticized by his opponents, such as Sen. Kamala Harris of California, as window dressing that encourages reforms but comes with no apparent enforcement mechanisms.
    The President’s executive order calls for the banning of choke holds by law enforcement officers, for example, but makes an exception for “those situations where the use of deadly force is allowed by law.”
    Advocates who want to eliminate the technique outright seized on this loophole, which would allow an officer to use a choke hold if they fear their life is in danger.
    “All police that use choke holds claim their lives were threatened,” wrote Al Sharpton, the civil rights activist, after Trump announced his executive order.
    The issue of banning choke holds will remain controversial. Some policing experts contend that, in a deadly situation where an officer is fighting for his or her life, anything goes.
    While Trump’s order purportedly takes aim at officers who “misuse” their authority, the President himself has called for the use of excessive force against those in custody.
    Upon taking office, Trump praised the aggressive tactics of immigration officers and suggested that police shouldn’t protect the heads of handcuffed suspects being put in the back of a car.
    “When you see these thugs being thrown into the back of a paddy wagon. You see them thrown in rough. I said, ‘Please don’t be too nice,'” Trump said to applause as he addressed a crowd of police officers in New York state.
    His comments were met with scorn by various law enforcement agencies.
    ‘If we don’t get it now, we’ll never get it’
    Despite calls by criminal justice reform activists for immediate changes to policing in America, there are some groups who appear content with buying time.
    Last Monday, Bob Kroll, president of the Minneapolis police union, told me he had not read all of the bills working their way through the state legislature. But he cautioned against rushing through police reforms.
    In comments that appeared tone-deaf to Floyd’s pleas to the officer choking him, Kroll said of efforts to rush through policing reform: “Everybody’s got to take a breath.”
    While the Minneapolis police union calls for more time, criminal justice advocates say lives remain in danger every day that passes without new constraints on officers.
    At a recent rally outside the Minnesota governor’s mansion, Del Shea Perry, the mother of Hardel Sherrel, told me her son had died in 2018 under suspicious circumstances while in jail after being arrested for domestic violence.
    Perry said she and other families have been trying desperately to get the attention of elected leaders and have them take concrete steps to root out bad cops. Perry said she will continue their efforts until they are successful.
    “I didn’t sign up for this,” Perry said. “I’m an evangelist, not an activist. But I’ve been pushed into an activism role.”
    Asked how long she will continue to be a public face for policing reform, Perry said, “Until we get justice.” Seizing on this moment of unprecedented national protest against police violence, she added: “If we don’t get it now, we’ll never get it.”

    in reply to: Biden, Trump, the left, elections… #117313
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: economics & the virus #117308
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: what polls show about support for the protests #117304
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/23/politics/black-lives-matter-support-impact/index.html

    Recent polling by the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation found that about 1-in-10 American adults said they had participated in protests this spring — a finding that would translate to about 25 million people.

    Critically, in their racial profiles, those who said they had protested virtually matched the overall population: In Kaiser’s findings, African Americans represented about 15% of the protesters, Asians and Hispanics slightly less than that, and Whites around three-fifths.

    That sense of shared interest from Hispanics and Asian Americans in a movement focused on discrimination against African Americans may be the most important trend in these recent polls, given the role those groups will play in the nation’s future growth. Those different communities of color did not always express such common interests.

    in reply to: what polls show about support for the protests #117303
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/28/us/politics/trump-approval-older-voters-coronavirus.html

    one of the most important maverick voting groups in the 2020 general election: conservative-leaning seniors who have soured on the Republican Party over the past four years.

    The Times poll…found that most seniors disapproved of Mr. Trump’s handling of race relations and his handling of the protests after the death of George Floyd.

    And as the coronavirus pandemic continues to sweep the country, putting older Americans at particular risk, these voters feel a special kind of frustration and betrayal with Mr. Trump’s ineffective leadership and often-blasé public comments about the crisis.

    in reply to: what polls show about support for the protests #117302
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/27/us/politics/trump-biden-protests-polling.html

    A survey of battleground states critical to November’s election largely mirrored the national results. Fifty-four percent of voters in those states said the way the criminal justice system treats Black Americans was a bigger problem than the incidents of rioting seen during some demonstrations. Just 37% said rioting was a bigger problem, though Trump and his allies have tried to discredit the protests by focusing on some isolated incidents of violence.

    The attitudes cut across race, geography and educational status, and speak to a country that has been awakened through protests to complaints that Black Americans have long made about police brutality and systemic racism. What began in the Democratic primary, in which white liberals showed a new openness to candidates speaking frankly about systemic injustice, has continued into the general election, with a spotlight on Trump’s response.

    The coalition of people sympathetic to the protesters’ cause, including Latino voters, exposes the limits of Trump’s tendency to exclusively speak directly to his overwhelmingly white and conservative base.

    in reply to: Just a thread for different kindsa interesting things #117301
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #117300
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Police & protestors — conflicting images #117299
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Bump.

    Old but valuable stuff in this thread.

    But it comes up because RamsWire listed Rams sack leaders using only the official stats, which started in 1982.

    Here’s what they have:

    ==

    from Rams’ top 20 all-time leaders in sacks: How close is Donald to No. 1?

    https://theramswire.usatoday.com/gallery/nfl-rams-sack-leaders-history-aaron-donald/

    it … became an official stat in 1982, so players from the ’70s and earlier don’t have any sacks to their name – including all-time greats like Jones and Olsen. That being said, we ranked the top 20 [official] sack leaders in Rams history. Donald is close to the top and could be No. 1 by the end of the 2020 season.

    20. Tyoka Jackson, 2001-2005
    18.5 sacks

    19. Reggie Doss, 1978-1987
    20.0 sacks

    18. Shawn Miller, 1984-1989
    21.0 sacks

    17. Doug Reed, 1984-1990
    22.5 sacks

    16. Michael Brockers, 2012-present
    23.0 sacks

    T14. Jack Youngblood, 1971-1984
    24.0 sacks

    T14. Sean Gilbert, 1992-1995
    24.0 sacks

    T12. William Hayes, 2012-2016
    26.5 sacks

    T12. Mel Owens, 1981-1989
    26.5 sacks

    11. James Hall, 2007-2011
    30.0 sacks

    10. D’Marco Farr, 1994-2000
    36.5 sacks

    9. Mike Wilcher, 1983-1990
    38.5 sacks

    8. Grant Wistom, 1998-2003
    41.5 sacks

    7. Gary Jeter, 1983-1988
    45.0 sacks

    6. Chris Long, 2008-2015
    54.5 sacks

    5. Robert Quinn, 2011-2017
    62.5 sacks

    4. Kevin Carter, 1995-2000
    62.5 sacks

    3. Aaron Donald, 2014-present
    72.0 sacks

    2. Kevin Greene, 1985-1992
    72.5 sacks

    1. Leonard Little, 1998-2009
    87.5 sacks

    in reply to: BLM aftermaths–news, tweets, observations, etc. #117296
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets & things … 6/26 thru 6/30 #117295
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #117294
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ==

    ==

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jason La Canfora@JasonLaCanfora
    As we reported on THE NFL TODAY days after Patriots were caught illegally taping the Bengals – New England was going to lose a significant draft pick. It will be a 2021 third-round selection

    Andrew Siciliano@AndrewSiciliano
    But wait!
    There’s more!

    Mike Garafolo@MikeGarafolo
    The NFL has handed down penalties for the #Patriots folowing the investigation of the filming of the #Bengals’ sideline, as @MikeReiss noted: $1.1m fine, loss of third-round draft pick next year, team production crews can’t film games this upcoming season.

    in reply to: tweets & things … 6/26 thru 6/30 #117288
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #117284
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #117283
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets & things … 6/26 thru 6/30 #117281
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets & things … 6/26 thru 6/30 #117280
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Charlottesville Nazis’ Lawyers Keep Dumping Them Ahead of Trial
    Lawyers for some of the defendants in a lawsuit over 2017’s deadly Unite the Right rally accuse their own clients and former clients of impeding the discovery process.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/charlottesville-nazis-lawyers-keep-dumping-them-ahead-of-trial

    When an attorney in a sprawling civil case dropped Richard Spencer as a client on Monday, the white nationalist became the eighth person to lose representation in the lawsuit, which takes aim at participants in the deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017.

    The lawsuit Sines v. Kessler names as defendants many of the major far-right participants in the Unite the Right rally—as it was branded—which plaintiffs say left lasting physical and emotional scars on Charlottesville and its people. Since the lawsuit was filed in late 2017, defendants have struggled to find or retain legal representation. Some, like Spencer and the former leader of the fascist “Traditionalist Worker Party,” got dropped for unpaid legal fees. A lawyer representing the neo-Nazi “National Socialist Movement” has filed, unsuccessfully, to drop clients over a supposed conflict of interest. And multiple defendants have lost representation after their lawyers said they were impossible—in one case, “repugnant”—to work with.

    Much of the American legal system has ground to a halt in recent months, with courtrooms closed over COVID-19, delaying civil and criminal cases alike. But the defendants in the Unite the Right case have a different problem: in a country with a long history of repugnant figures securing A-list legal representation, no one wants to hold them down.

    Spencer’s lawyer, John DiNucci, filed to drop him as a client earlier this month, citing unpaid fees and his alleged lack of cooperation with the case. In a hearing this month, Spencer claimed his reputation prevented him from making enough money to pay his lawyer. (This month Spencer also faced, but avoided, jail time over unpaid fees related to his ongoing divorce in Montana.) Neither Spencer nor DiNucci returned The Daily Beast’s request for comment.

    Sines v. Kessler is being backed by the civil liberties group Integrity First For America. Its executive director, Amy Spitalnick, said defendants’ lawyers were jumping ship for a variety of reasons.

    “In some cases, these attorneys have moved to withdraw because they haven’t been paid or their clients haven’t been communicating with them,” Spitalnick told The Daily Beast. “In other cases, they’ve cited their clients’ ‘repugnant conduct.’ At the end of the day, the clients and their attorneys, to the extent they have them, are obligated to comply with the court orders and the defendants’ discovery obligations. That is what our plaintiffs are focused on right now.”

    Although Sines v. Kessler is scheduled to go to trial in October, the discovery process is long underway. Plaintiffs are pushing defendants to turn over communications and evidence relating to the planning of the rally, where a neo-Nazi drove a car into a crowd of counter-demonstrators, killing one and wounding dozens more.

    But some of the defendants’ own lawyers accuse their clients and former clients of impeding the discovery process. Attorneys Elmer Woodard and James Kolenich, who represent many defendants, abandoned the neo-Nazi group Vanguard America last June, claiming that the now-disbanded hate group had stopped communicating with them in the discovery process.

    Dillon Hopper, the group’s one-time leader, told The Daily Beast he hadn’t turned in the necessary information.

    “The reason I was dropped is due to my own failure to provide proper documentation in a timely manner, which caused the lawyer to become disgruntled and not want to represent me any further,” Hopper said in an email. In a filing last year, he also claimed that he was broke, and could not pay more urgent medical bills.

    Though they still represent a host of far-right defendants, Woodard and Kolenich have apparently given up on three others. In January 2019, the pair successfully withdrew from representing former Traditionalist Worker Party leader Matthew Heimbach. (It was their second attempt, after their first motion to withdraw was denied.) The lawyers said Heimbach hadn’t paid them, and that he’d cut off communication with them.

    In a message to The Daily Beast, Heimbach said the lawsuit was too expensive, and accused Woodard and Kolenich of jacking up their rates because “most attorneys don’t want to be labeled a ‘Klan lawyer.’” (Neither Woodard nor Kolenich returned requests for comment.) He also cited campaigns by anti-fascists to boot white supremacists off online fundraising platforms like GoFundMe.

    Woodard and Kolenich (the latter of whom previously gave an interview parroting an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory and claiming that “white people are the chosen people in the New Testament”) have also dropped a pair of far-right internet-personalities in the case. In July, they withdrew representation from Christopher Cantwell and Robert “Azzmador” Ray.

    Ray has been difficult to work with, the lawyers argued, because he’s been on the run since at least June 2018, avoiding charges for allegedly using tear gas at Unite the Right. (His defense in that case is shaky, because he boasted on video that “I personally, literally, gassed half a dozen k*kes.”)

    The lawyers’ only means of contacting Ray was via the comments section on a white supremacist site. “Counsel had to request contact through an alternative means (an online Alt-Right comment area) and Mr. Ray would then call,” they wrote in a filing, adding that he had not paid his bills. (Ray could not be reached for comment.)

    Woodard and Kolenich also dropped Cantwell, after he made violent comments about the plaintiffs’ lead attorney on the messaging app Telegram. “Mr. Cantwell has rendered Attorney’s continued representation of him unreasonably difficult, has created a conflict of interest between himself and Attorney’s other clients, and has engaged in conduct Attorney’s consider ‘repugnant or imprudent,’” the lawyers wrote in a withdrawal motion, also citing his unpaid legal fees. (Cantwell could not be immediately reached, as he is in jail awaiting trial for incitement after he allegedly threatened to rape a woman in front of her children.)

    Meanwhile, an attorney representing the group National Socialist Movement and its former leader has filed to withdraw, so far unsuccessfully. Attorney William ReBrook, who did not return a request for comment, claimed that representing both the group and its former leader constituted a conflict of interest. That former leader, Jeff Schoep, claims to have abandoned decades of neo-Nazism just in time for the lawsuit, a claim that some observers of the far right have met with raised eyebrows. (Schoep did not return a request for comment.)

    In a filing opposing ReBrook’s withdrawal, plaintiffs’ lawyers argued that ReBrook knew Schoep had already stepped down by the time he took the case. The plaintiffs accused ReBrook of being a “willing participant” in an increasingly complex bid not to turn over discovery evidence.

    Spitalnick said the defendants had spent years trying to avoid handing over records that might indicate their complicity in the violent rally. It was hard not to see the fiasco that is their quest for legal representation as an extension of that.

    “It’s been over two and a half years since this case was filed,” she said, “and the defendants have tried every trick in the book to avoid accountability.”

Viewing 30 posts - 20,221 through 20,250 (of 47,639 total)