Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 19,951 through 19,980 (of 47,639 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    About 1/4 of our staff is anti-maskers to the point of saying they would refuse to wear a mask.

    Man.

    Educators are supposed to be educated.

    in reply to: Goff talk … June to Sept. (a lot of great stuff here) #118037
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is here because Goff comes up.

    in reply to: We have a problem #118027
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets & things … 7/14 thru 7/20 #118025
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets & things … 7/14 thru 7/20 #118022
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets & things … 7/14 thru 7/20 #118021
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: The Trump Thread: Pro? Con? Who cares? #118018
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    BrooklynDad_Defiant!@mmpadellan
    I was just about to tweet that trump is the first “president” since James K. Polk not to have a dog, but then I remembered he has Mike Pence

    in reply to: Change it (the Washington team name thread) #118016
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    On the Shameful and Skewed ‘Redskins’ Poll
    The Washington Post did a grave disservice by utterly ignoring studies that clearly demonstrate the harm mascotting causes.

    MAY 25, 2016

    https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/on-the-shameful-and-skewed-redskins-poll/

    Last Thursday, The Washington Post published a poll on its front page that found that 90 percent of “Native Americans” were “not bothered” by the dictionary-defined ethnic slur “Redskins,” sending shock waves through the sports world and Indian Country. That slur, of course, is also the name of the local NFL franchise that the Post covers.

    This article is part of the Edge of Sports series, an ongoing effort to publish new writers on the intersection of sports and politics.

    To get this number, the Post’s polling team questioned 504 self-identified Native Americans from all 50 states. Given that I have 50 first cousins who are enrolled in the Navajo and Yankton Dakota Sioux Nations, none of whom likes the team name, I found the results to be curious. When I looked more closely at the methodology of the poll, I was appalled.

    First and foremost, the Post states clearly that they did not verify the actual Native American identity or tribal enrollment of its respondents. Unlike most “minorities,” non-Native Americans have often declared themselves Native American with little or no factual evidence or cultural connection whatsoever. Furthermore, 56 percent of those asked said they were not part of any tribal nation or could not name what tribe their ancestors claimed. Imagine asking 500 white Americans for an opinion about Europe and not caring that more than half had no connection to their ancestors’ place of origin.

    When asked about this (via e-mail), Scott Clement, the polling director at the Post responded:

    We see little reason to suspect respondents would intentionally misreport their racial identity or tribal status to a confidential survey. The overall poll results suggest respondents understood a distinction between racial identification and tribal membership, given that a majority of self-identified Native Americans said they were not enrolled. The substantive questions about the team’s name came at the end of polls on other subjects and after survey respondents already had self-identified, leaving no motive (or even opportunity) for individuals to self-identify as Native American when they learned that the questions would center on the team’s name.

    Leaving aside the issues of “self-identification,” there is also a problem with demographics. More than half, 274, were over the age of 50. Native Americans have a median age of 26—nearly 10 years younger than the general American population. The Post claims that they “weighted” the results to make sure that those over 50 were given just 39 percent of the voice. But even with “weighting,” by speaking primarily to people over 50—and then including their quotes in the piece as representative of the survey—the Post presented an inaccurate portrait of who we are as a people.

    Male respondents also outnumbered female ones, which was quite a feat as Native American men have the highest mortality rates in the country. I remember when my dad was in his 50s and he went back to his reservation in South Dakota and was shocked to realize he was the only Yankton Dakota man left from his high-school class.

    Furthermore, only 76, or 15 percent, of respondents were under the age of 29—and none of the respondents were under 18. Clement said that the Post never polls people under 18. “Our national surveys typically interview the adult population both for its relevance to voting and political participation and practical difficulties in reaching respondents who are younger than that age, i.e. ethical considerations about obtaining parental permission to participate.”

    But not polling this segment of the population means the results exclude the Native American students who attend the 2,000 high schools in this country that mascot Native Americans. The White House Initiative on American Indian and Alaska Native Education report [PDF] recounts firsthand experiences of Native youth facing discrimination in their learning environment caused by mascotting.

    Aside from demographics, there was also the geographic distribution of the poll. Very few were from areas of the country where most Native American people reside. Only 12 percent of those polled were from the Mountain region where 18 out of 20 of the most heavily populated Native American reservation communities are, according to the US Census. However, 36 percent of the respondents were from the South, where in 1836 most of the Native American population was forcibly marched out on the Trail of Tears. Now, according to the Census, only 13 percent of the total estimated population of Native Americans lives in the South. Clement said that this did not affect their results, e-mailing, “Respondents in the Mountain region were among the most likely to report enrollment with a tribe (67 percent did so), but the share who said the Washington Redskins’ team name was offensive was little different from the overall results (8 percent).”

    Brian Pollard, board member of the Native American Journalists Association and former Cherokee Phoenix editor said to me, “What they’ve created is a piece of data that drives a narrative they desired. This is pretty much frowned upon in the world of journalism to create a story in this way. It would be different if Stanford did a poll and The Washington Post covered it. That to me would be much more ethical from a journalistic standpoint. But this was way beyond that. This was something they manufactured from the beginning.”

    Even if the poll was conducted perfectly and even if the results had been completely reversed, The Washington Post did a grave disservice by utterly ignoring studies that clearly demonstrate the harm mascotting causes to Native youth—the most vulnerable population in the country by almost any statistic.

    Our young people have a rate of suicide 2.5 times higher than average. According to the American Psychological Association, which has called for the ending of the practice of mascotting, Native youth suffer measurably lower self-esteem after exposure to a Native American mascot. It also found that Native respondents who claim to be okay with Native mascots actually experience a greater drop in self-esteem. This finding is particularly relevant to the Washington Post poll, which has been widely interpreted as proof that there’s no harm in using the slur for a $2 billion NFL franchise in the nation’s capital.

    On Friday the Native American Journalist Association in conjunction with UNITY: Journalists of Diversity issued a statement criticizing the poll for violating the tenet to “minimize harm” in reporting.

    The reporters and editors behind this story must have known that it would be used as justification for the continued use of these harmful, racist mascots. They were either willfully malicious or dangerously naïve in the process and reporting used in this story, and neither is acceptable from any journalistic institution…. It is NAJA’s position that journalism should only be practiced when it is in the interest of public enlightenment and democracy, and should never be used as a tool of racial oppression or corporate cheerleading.

    Scott Clement responded to NAJA, writing:

    The Post pursued this poll without any idea as to how it would turn out and had no vested interest in the outcome. When activists argue that Native Americans are offended by the name—and when debate over the name is at the center of a major public-policy debate—it’s entirely appropriate for a news organization to conduct a survey to test any assertions made about the breadth and depth of offense among Native Americans. This is customary for any other public policy issue.”

    But is this really customary? Are pollsters judging the “breadth and depth” of how offensive other dictionary-defined slurs are? Tragically, it is only Native Americans who have to suffer this kind of humiliation, especially when the multibillion-dollar brand of the paper’s local football team hangs in the balance.

    Jacqueline KeelerTWITTERJacqueline Keeler is a Navajo/Yankton Dakota Sioux writer living in Portland, Oregon and co-founder of Eradicating Offensive Native Mascotry (creators of the hashtag #NotYourMascot). She is finishing a collection of essays called Not Your Disappearing Indian and editing an anthology of Native voices for Torrey House Press on preserving sacred lands.

    in reply to: Rams tweets & things … 7/14 thru 7/20 #118015
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Trump coup against the CDC #118014
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets & things … 7/14 thru 7/20 #118003
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Just a thread for different kindsa interesting things #118002
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: incidents thread #117996
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams tweets & things … 7/14 thru 7/20 #117995
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Change it (the Washington team name thread) #117994
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams TEs #117993
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams TEs #117992
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PFF LA Rams@PFF_Rams
    Tyler Higbee led all players in receiving yards during the last 5 weeks of 2019

    ==

    ME: Just some details. Higbee has shown that he is a top receiver. He also has the highest catch percentage of any Ram with more than 40 targets, at 77.5%. Kupp is 2nd at 70.1%. Among league TEs with 40 or more targets TH’s catch percentage ranks 2nd only to Kittle. Among all league WRs and TEs combined with 40 or more targets he ranks 3rd (behind Kittle and Michael Thomas).

    in reply to: Rams TEs #117988
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    merlin

    We probably keep 4 TEs given likelihood of more 12 sets. Higs/Everett/Mundt are probably set in stone because all offer good things. Higs will get a lot of earlier reads by the QB this year I think as a result of how he played down the stretch.

    Mundt is coming for Everett’s pudding cup. Lot of folks probably find that unlikely or even impossible, but Mundt has shown significant development in blocking and there is a good chance the Rams use that 12 personnel to dictate the run game in 2020. I don’t think people realize how involved Mundt was blocking nor how good he is at it. Which is really what we need when we go to 12 sets. It’s not really necessary to put Mundt in the pattern as we have Higs for that. Mundt might get some backfield looks if they elect to use a lead blocker which might happen if the line struggles early.

    Everett’s not a bad blocker btw, but in terms of consistency the Rams need to lessen penetration in their run scheme and Everett isn’t nearly as good as Mundt at playing a flex role, blocking between the tackles, pulling, etc. Everett will need to redouble his efforts on the blocking side to give himself the best chance to hold onto that TE2 role.

    And btw… I would love to see Everett have a Pro Bowl season in 2020. That would be amazing for us. Just don’t think it’s gonna happen.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: The Trump Thread: Pro? Con? Who cares? #117985
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: “who R the Rams in 2020” type articles #117980
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    2020 NFL Preview: This is the season we find out about Sean McVay, Jared Goff and Rams in general

    Frank Schwab

    J.B. Long@JB_Long
    Frank does the team preview game very well.

    No. 17 is lower than I would’ve thought for the Rams… and about as low as I’ve seen them slotted for 2020.

    Frank Schwab@YahooSchwab
    Thanks man. And we’ll see, just not liking their offseason. But that’s the beauty of the season, never know.

    in reply to: Change it (the Washington team name thread) #117979
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: “who R the Rams in 2020” type articles #117975
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    2020 NFL Preview: This is the season we find out about Sean McVay, Jared Goff and Rams in general

    Frank Schwab

    https://sports.yahoo.com/2020-nfl-preview-this-is-the-season-we-find-out-about-sean-mc-vay-jared-goff-and-rams-in-general-130022520.html

    When Greg Zuerlein nailed a 57-yard field goal in overtime at the Superdome on Jan. 20, 2019, the Los Angeles Rams were on top of the world.

    They were headed to the Super Bowl. Jared Goff had just been named to his second Pro Bowl and was a few months away from a four-year, $134 million deal. Sean McVay had validated his hype as the NFL’s next great coach. Teams would scramble to hire coaches with even a remote connection to McVay, and brag about it in announcing the hires. You could have talked yourself into the Rams being the NFL’s next dynasty.

    The thought that we’d go into the 2020 season questioning Goff, McVay and the Rams’ approach in general wasn’t on anyone’s mind. The NFL moves fast.

    The Super Bowl was a rough one. Goff struggled badly. McVay was thoroughly outcoached by Bill Belichick and then-New England Patriots defensive coordinator Brian Flores. He immediately acknowledged it. The Patriots won an ugly game. Then, the Rams missed the playoffs in 2019 and had an offseason of reckoning. Many key veterans are gone, including running back Todd Gurley. Even Zuerlein, whose clutch kick at New Orleans was as true as could be, left in free agency.

    The last year-plus since that Super Bowl loss revealed some cracks. McVay’s offense, overly reliant on three-receiver sets and play-action passes, was exposed a bit. Goff didn’t look anything like a $134 million quarterback and didn’t make another Pro Bowl. Not even close. The Rams went from a team that was lauded for aggressively pursuing a championship to one that looked impulsive and mismanaged. We’d rip any other team for some of the moves the Rams have botched.

    The Rams haven’t made a first-round pick since Goff in 2016. They’ve traded those picks for big-name players, but there’s a reason teams avoid that method of roster building. Those stars need contract extensions. Cornerback Jalen Ramsey is soon to be the latest to get a massive contract, and the Rams have no leverage after trading a ton for him. Brandin Cooks did get a big extension after the Rams traded a first for him, and then he was traded to the Houston Texans with an NFL-record $21.8 million dead cap hit left behind. Gurley was cut two years into his four-year, $60 million deal (which was questioned at the time due to how often running back contract extensions fail), and then he and Clay Matthews openly complained the Rams were stalling in paying them guaranteed money they were owed. These moves aren’t indicative of a franchise that has any long-term plan.

    And to think, that day at the Superdome was only about 18 months ago.

    We’ve seen McVay and Goff rise and then fall together, and 2020 seems like a crossroads for them and the Rams. McVay started to morph his scheme, going to two-tight end sets 21 percent of the time last season, according to SharpFootballStats.com. The Rams used three receivers 89 percent of the time in 2018. Goff is probably due some positive touchdown regression after falling from 32 to 22 last season. He probably isn’t a quarterback who can carry a team, but he’s probably not as bad as he was last year.

    It will be a challenge to bounce back. Key veterans are gone. The offensive line has become an issue, and the Rams haven’t had the cap space or draft picks to replenish it. The Rams are still looking for someone to take Gurley’s place, and have spent valuable draft picks two straight years on the position. This isn’t the loaded Rams roster that made the Super Bowl two seasons ago.

    The Rams need their coach and quarterback to make up for those deficiencies. And we ask a question that seemed ludicrous that afternoon in the Superdome a year and a half ago: Do the Rams have the right pieces in those key places? We might find out this season.

    Here’s a list of the key players who the Rams won’t have back in 2020: edge rushers Dante Fowler and Clay Matthews, safety Eric Weddle, cornerback Nickell Robey-Coleman, linebacker Cory Littleton, running back Todd Gurley, receiver Brandin Cooks and kicker Greg Zuerlein. Defensive coordinator Wade Phillips was let go, too. The Rams did re-sign left tackle Andrew Whitworth, but there is some risk in a player who will turn 39 during the season. They also signed former Bears first-round pick Leonard Floyd to rush the passer, but he’s not as good as Fowler. The Rams didn’t have a first-round pick as usual and used their first second-round pick on running back Cam Akers, a questionable allocation of limited resources. Running back is usually a luxury pick that high, and the Rams have holes to fill (linebacker and offensive line primary among them). There’s no way around it: This was a rough offseason.

    GRADE: D

    Jared Goff’s biggest issue last season was that the Rams’ play-action game evaporated. A staple of Sean McVay’s offense, the Rams still used play action a lot last season but with far less success.

    Goff ranked 23rd of 24th qualified passers in passer rating on play-action plays last season, according to Pro Football Focus. In 2017 and 2018, Goff led the NFL in passing yards on play-action passes and was sixth in the league in passer rating on those plays.

    Goff used play action on the third-highest rate among quarterbacks last season (32.8 percent) but his rating on those plays fell from 109.3 in 2017 and 115 in 2018 to 85.9 last season. So the Rams were using play action as much as anyone in football, and Goff was 25-30 passer rating points worse at it. That’s a problem.

    Although analysts have shown there is little correlation between a strong running game and success on play action, Los Angeles’ running game taking a big step back probably didn’t help. Also, opposing defenses seemed to have adjusted. That might have started late in the 2018 season, when the Chicago Bears and Detroit Lions each took away the Rams’ outside zone runs and neutralized the play-action passes in the process. Either that trend turns back around and the Rams become a successful play-action team again, or Goff will have to figure out how to make up for that lost production.

    Aaron Donald had a little more “normal” season in 2019. His 2018, when he set a record for a defensive tackle with 20.5 sacks and also had 41 quarterback hits, is one of the greatest seasons ever for a defensive player. In 2019, Donald was still great — 12.5 sacks, 24 quarterback hits, the No. 1-graded interior defender in the NFL by Pro Football Focus for the fifth consecutive year — but he just wasn’t superhuman. The Rams lost a lot on defense this offseason, but they still have the best defensive player in the game.

    From Yahoo’s Scott Pianowski: “Tyler Higbee had four straight 100-yard games at the end of 2019. Baseball analyst Bill James would call this signature significance — the magnitude of that performance is enough that we can overlook a smallish sample. Higbee looks like a full-season breakout waiting to happen, as the Rams likely change the shape of their offense (remember how eagerly they discarded Brandin Cooks). The market has been proactive with Higbee, but I am still comfortable drafting him as one of the top 6-8 tight ends.”

    Cooper Kupp was a monster in the first half last season, posting a 58-792-5 line. Then in the second half, that dropped to 36-369-5. The Rams’ offense changed, and so did Kupp’s role. The Rams started using more two-tight end sets and that moved Kupp out of the slot. Kupp saw a target on 30.3 percent of his snaps from the slot in the first half, which led the NFL by a wide margin, according to Pro Football Focus. That dropped to 21 percent in the second half. Kupp’s percentage of snaps from the slot fell from 74.1 to 59.7. Kupp is a slot receiver and one of the best in the game, but if the Rams’ offense continues to move away from using so many three-receiver sets — tight end Tyler Higbee’s late breakout might ensure that — that means fewer slot snaps for Kupp and presumably less production.

    Can the Rams run the ball?

    The Rams were a top-10 running team in every major category in 2017 and 2018. In 2019, they were 26th in rushing yards and 27th in yards per attempt. Some of that falloff was game-script related — the Rams went 24-8 in 2017 and 2018 and were often running to protect leads — but the efficiency wasn’t there either. Todd Gurley was a shell of his old self. The Rams drafted Darrell Henderson in the third round last year, and he did very little. The Rams seemed to give up on Henderson when they picked Cam Akers in he second round this year. Akers is a good talent, but a significant investment in running back seemed odd with the Rams’ other questions. In a perfect world, Akers is Gurley 2.0 and he reinvigorates the run game and that assists play-action passing. That could help the Rams’ offense return to 2017 and 2018 levels.

    The Rams weren’t a bad team last year. They went 9-7 against the toughest schedule in the NFL last season, according to Football Outsiders. They weren’t egregiously poor in any area, aside from rushing offense. If Sean McVay can reinvent the offense, Jared Goff returns to his 2017-18 form and Cam Akers (or someone) gives the run game a punch, the Rams could be in the playoffs again. There were a lot of defections this offseason but still enough front-line talent to be a quality team.

    The Rams lost a lot of important players and because they don’t have much cap flexibility, they didn’t add too much. They play in perhaps the toughest division in the NFL, so there won’t be many easy weeks. If Sean McVay is as good of a coach as advertised — and he probably is — then he’ll use the offseason to reinvent his scheme that opponents have caught up to a bit. But what if it doesn’t happen? What if McVay and Jared Goff struggle again? It would feel crushing to realize the Rams’ window to be a contender was that small.

    We never think good teams will fall off right away. It’s inconceivable to us that the Kansas City Chiefs, Baltimore Ravens, San Francisco 49ers or another promising team from 2019 will become mediocre overnight. But unless you’re the New England Patriots, it happens all the time. The Rams took a shot and were tied halfway through the fourth quarter of a Super Bowl. Any team would take that scenario. However, it came at a price. The Rams’ sudden success under Sean McVay obscured some poor moves with contracts and trades. Now that the success has waned, we’ll see the Rams take another small step back, as that NFC championship becomes more of a distant memory.

    in reply to: stories about racism & what it is #117969
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    What It’s Like To Be Biracial And Arguing With Your White Family Right Now
    For multiracial Americans, having conversations with white relatives about the Black Lives Matter movement and racial injustice is often an uphill battle.

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/biracial-white-family-argument_l_5f08a9f2c5b6480493cfa0a5

    Rachel Elizabeth Weissler, a Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan, has the kind of close-knit relationship with her dad most people would envy. He lives in Southern California, where Weissler spent most of her childhood, but the two talk frequently. She calls him her “biggest cheerleader.”

    But there’s one topic they always seem to dance around: race.

    Weissler is biracial: Her dad is white and her mom is Black. Though her dad loves Black culture (“Black TV especially,” Weissler said) and clearly, Black women, he tenses up when his daughter wants to talk about what it’s like to be Black in America.

    “He avoids the subject, and when he does bring it up, it’s often in an extremely superficial way,” Weissler said.

    In the wake of the murder of George Floyd and ongoing protests against police brutality and systemic racism, her father’s silence became deafening for Weissler. While she was preoccupied with work and taking care of herself in the days after the shooting, she wondered what her dad thought. It had been radio silence on his end, so she decided to text him. She couldn’t help but take a sardonic tone.

    “What do you think about all the black people that keep getting murdered!” Weissler wrote.

    Radio silence again.

    “Yes, he left me on ‘read,’” Weissler told HuffPost a month after the exchange. He called her the next day.

    “He said he didn’t know what to say about what’s going on in the world right now and focused on asking me if I was safe due to all the ‘looting’ going on,” Weissler said. He probably also mentioned Trump, she said.

    “In almost every conversation with him, he tries to remind me that he ‘didn’t vote for Trump,’ as if that exonerates him from being complicit in racism,” she said.

    Weissler has learned to redirect, though.

    “I often remind my dad that he has a Black child, and he usually just laughs,” she said. “I will say that I have deep love for my dad, and something I am so grateful for is that as I’ve grown up and into my ideologies and feminism, I feel empowered to share with him when I think he’s said something wrong or racist or insensitive, and he does listen and let me talk.”

    It’s hard to broach these conversations. While her dad never corrects her or dismisses her experience, Weissler can only hope that he’s truly hearing what she says.

    “Is he absorbing what I tell him? That I can’t tell you. But I am grateful he lets me call him out, and listens,” she said.

    Weissler’s story isn’t unique: As the national conversation about race and longstanding systemic racism continues online and in our homes, many biracial adults say they are struggling to connect and get through to the white side of their families when discussing what it means to be Black in America.

    Family or not, it’s impossible for a white person to fully understand the deep-seated grief a Black or biracial person experiences every time another Black person is needlessly killed by the police.

    You might assume that a white person with Black family would have an easier time understanding that pain ― that hearing about the racism and lived experiences of, say, your granddaughter or cousin, would move you beyond the naïveté or willful ignorance most white Americans have about modern racism. That you wouldn’t have the luxury to remain complacent or indifferent to racial injustice because you’ve seen your own flesh and blood experience it.

    But as many biracial people in the U.S. will tell you, dynamics in multiracial families are a lot more complicated than that. Sometimes, the silence is more comforting on both sides. When you’ve been vulnerable with your white relatives and shared your experiences with racism and they still deny it exists, it’s exhausting. In a scenario like this, avoiding any and all talk of race is a way to preserve your sanity.

    Last month, Nicole Holliday, an assistant professor of linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania, tweeted about that very disconnect.

    “Shoutout to all my fellow biracial folks who are dodging calls from white family members right now, because they can’t risk having to hear some racist BS from their own parents,” she wrote.

    Holliday, who identifies as Black and biracial “in that order,” grew up in a racially mixed neighborhood.

    Her dad, who’s Black, wasn’t in the picture much during her childhood, but his family was. Her mother, who’s white, made sure Holliday understood Black history. In college, Holliday’s Black social and political identity took hold and flourished.

    But for the white side of her family, “it was very important to my family that I was always referred to as ‘biracial,’ never ‘black.’”

    “I think my family members, many [of] whom are conservative, really struggle with understanding how the entire social and economic system of this country was built on black exploitation, and they’re pretty quick to give excuses for racist behavior, especially when it comes from Trump,” Holliday wrote HuffPost. “I think they think he’s a buffoon who’s been good for their pocketbooks, but who isn’t genuinely a racist person.”

    As Holliday’s tweet suggests, she isn’t in the habit of discussing race with those family members, but her mom is a different story.

    After Eric Garner’s murder, there was a long period when they didn’t talk (“I felt like she was unquestioningly defending the cops”), but given the relentlessness of similar incidents in the past six years, Holliday thinks her mom is starting to get it. It’s impossible to look away.

    “She seems to understand how routine police violence against black folks is, and how it creates a situation in which we live with everyday terror,” Holliday wrote.

    That said, sometimes getting through to her mom feels like one step forward, two steps back.

    “It’s really complicated lately because I know she’s really heartbroken about the murder of Ahmaud Arbery, but I’m not sure she sees the other victims in the same light,” she said. “I talk to my mother but for the first time, I’ve actively started shutting her down and changing the conversation if she starts to defend racists, especially Trump.”

    Holliday is wary of what her white grandma will have to say each time the police kill another Black person, but she usually reaches out anyway. She refuses to give up on either woman.

    “I’ve been avoiding calling my grandmother because I’m afraid she’ll be really negative about the protestors and I just don’t want to hear it,” she said. “I’ve already been out of touch with the rest of my white family because of their reactions to racist incidents in the past, but I really don’t want to lose my mom and grandma.”

    The idea of “losing” or giving up on a family member due to their failure to recognize racial injustice in this country is all too real for Ethan HD, a professional wrestler and comic shop owner in Chicago. Luckily, he said his mother, who’s white, has been incredibly understanding about what’s going on.

    She, like many white parents, tries to learn and understand how she can help.

    “She’s witnessed racial prejudice firsthand when she would be out with my father in public back in the 80s,” HD told HuffPost in an email. “She’s never once tried to play devil’s advocate when discussing our country’s systemic racism.”

    But his extended white family views things differently. He’s had to cut off contact, at least on social media, with some family members, including a cousin he’s gotten into Facebook arguments with often in recent years.

    When quarterback Colin Kaepernick first took a knee in 2016, that cousin told HD that siding with the NFL player was “disrespecting [their deceased grandfather] who served in the military.”

    At the height of the protests, the same cousin started posting videos of police hugging children and Black citizens on social media.

    “I explained that she’s covering up the issue by pretending like there aren’t dozens of videos being posted daily showing police officers assaulting black folks and people fighting for the Black Lives Matter movement,” HD said.

    His cousin argued that she was married to a police officer and had to be careful about what she posted online.

    “I replied that agreeing that ‘Black Lives Matter’ shouldn’t be something you get in trouble for saying and then I dropped the issue because I knew where it was heading.”

    “I finally gave up contact with my cousin and my aunt when I saw them posting ‘All Lives Matter’ nonsense,” he added. “I decided to block them on social media.”

    Jessi Grieser, an assistant professor at the University of Tennessee, is multiracial and transracially adopted. Her family members on both sides are white, except for one of her two brothers, who is also adopted. She’s never had to block a white relative on social media. Her family, she said, is very “Midwestern nice.”

    “It’s common for my family to just not talk about things which are contentious. So mostly [BLM] hasn’t come up,” she said. “At first I was really grateful but it then eventually did start to feel a little bit like, ‘Um, are you noticing what’s going on?’”

    Grieser said she thinks her parents wait for her to initiate these kinds of conversations, which seems thoughtful but inevitably creates “extra work” in terms of emotional labor for her.

    She credits them with paying attention to Black issues in the news, seeking out Black-owned businesses, and staying in their integrated neighborhood long after their Black kids had moved out. And they read all the obligatory books about being anti-racist that topped The New York Times bestseller lists the last month.

    But she says they struggle to conceive of themselves as doing racist things, outside of simply being a part of a racist system.

    “I do get accused of picking on them ‘about everything,’” she said. “For instance, if I point out that asking the taxi driver (micro)aggressively ‘where are you from?’ isn’t actually a friendly thing to do. Everyone’s feelings get hurt pretty fast.”

    She added: “I’m really not supposed to point those things out, and if I do point them out and they say they’re sorry, that’s clearly supposed to be the end of it, whether it happens again or not. It’s exhausting.”

    Her extended family hasn’t reached out since the protests, but she’s actually glad about that.

    “I don’t usually talk to them, so if anyone got in touch to ‘check in and see how our Black relative is doing’ it would have been very performative and probably would have made me mad,” she said.

    Grieser said her family, like many white families, likes to flaunt having a Black relative as “proof” of how post-racial they are. As biracial artist Nicole Linh Anderson recently pointed out, “people love biracial babies because it feeds into a feel-good melting pot narrative.” Of course, a multiracial person and/or their white relatives can still benefit from white supremacy and hold racist views.

    Grieser said most people in her extended family “seem to think racism is pretty much just over, or if it’s not, it really only exists in the form of people yelling the N-word. White people adopt Black kids, my cousin is married to a Taiwanese man, obviously, all this is evidence that we left racism behind a few decades ago.”

    That “evidence” makes it incredibly hard to get through to them that racism is alive and well. Griesler said the majority of her white relatives subscribe to the “good/bad” binary of racism that sociologist Robin DiAngelo talks about in her book “White Fragility.” It’s the idea that racism is only inflicted by “mean” or evil people who engage in deliberate racist actions.

    “They think that as long as they weren’t deliberately trying to be cruel, nothing they say or do could possibly be racist,” she said. “I had to actually tell my aunt to her face at Christmas that Sierra Leonians not being nice to her when she was in the Peace Corps is not a glimpse into what it is like to be Black in the United States and that it was a very wrongheaded thing to say to me.”

    Griesler gets frustrated to think that relatives might use her as an excuse to claim they’re not racist, especially when they make her uncomfortable all the time with comments about racism. She wants her white family members to see race so they can recognize racism ― boldfaced and obviously cruel, or quiet and systematic ― and realize that you can be a good person while still existing in and benefiting from a society that’s deeply rooted in racism.

    For many biracial adults, what’s almost more frustrating than silent white relatives are white relatives who claim they can’t be racist because they have biracial kids in their family, Holliday said.

    “There’s a regular scholarly conference called Critical Mixed Race Studies and a few years back I went to a panel about white moms who claim that they ‘get it’ because of their black kids.”

    It’s the oldest story in the book, she said; multiracial kids hear it all the time.

    “In my case, I think some of my family members truly don’t understand that proximity to blackness isn’t the same as being black, and that there are parts of my experience that they’ll never understand,” she said. “Their investment in colorblind racism is an emotional shield for them, but I feel like it also keeps them for really and truly seeing me.”

    Like many white people, Holliday’s relatives endeavor to look beyond her race ― as a sort of “favor” to her ― when all she really wants is for them to acknowledge her Blackness.

    “If they ‘don’t see race’ then I think that they’re choosing to ignore seeing the part of me that they don’t like,” she wrote, “because that’s also the part that’s most different from them.”

    in reply to: incidents thread #117968
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Facebook

    Mary E. Joyce:

    To Betsy DeVos, we “teachers” have a few questions for you:

    • If a teacher tests positive for COVID-19 are they required to quarantine for 2-3 weeks? Is their sick leave covered, paid?

    • If that teacher has 5 classes a day with 30 students each, do all 150 of those students need to then stay home and quarantine for 14 days?

    • Do all 150 of those students now have to get tested? Who pays for those tests? Are they happening at school? How are the parents being notified? Does everyone in each of those kids’ families need to get tested? Who pays for that?

    • What if someone who lives in the same house as a teacher tests positive? Does that teacher now need to take 14 days off of work to quarantine? Is that time off covered? Paid?

    • Where is the district going to find a substitute teacher who will work in a classroom full of exposed, possibly infected students for substitute pay?

    • Substitutes teach in multiple schools. What if they are diagnosed with COVID-19? Do all the kids in each school now have to quarantine and get tested? Who is going to pay for that?

    • What if a student in your kid’s class tests positive? What if your kid tests positive? Does every other student and teacher they have been around quarantine? Do we all get notified who is infected and when? Or because of HIPAA regulations are parents and teachers just going to get mysterious “may have been in contact” emails all year long?

    • What is this stress going to do to our teachers? How does it affect their health and well-being? How does it affect their ability to teach? How does it affect the quality of education they are able to provide? What is it going to do to our kids? What are the long-term effects of consistently being stressed out?

    • How will it affect students and faculty when the first teacher in their school dies from this? The first parent of a student who brought it home? The first kid?

    • How many more people are going to die, that otherwise would not have if we had stayed home longer?

    30% of the teachers in the US are over 50. About 16% of the total deaths in the US are people between the ages of 45-65.

    We are choosing to put our teachers in danger.
    We’re not paying them more.

    We aren’t spending anywhere near the right amount to protect them. And in turn, we are putting ourselves and our kids in danger.”

    in reply to: factoids & other things of interest #117965
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    so is he trying to say predators are bad?

    Not that I saw.

    To me, he was just pointing to an evolutionary difference caused by the environment, which in this case is just the presence or absence of predators.

    I don’t think any judgments were made, it’s just funny to see the difference.

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #117962
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from US man, 30, dies from virus after attending ‘COVID party’

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-man-30-dies-virus-attending-covid-party-230251335.html

    A 30-year-old man who believed the coronavirus was a hoax and attended a “Covid party” died after being infected with the virus, according to the chief medical officer at a Texas hospital.

    The official, Dr. Jane Appleby of Methodist Hospital in San Antonio, said the man died after deliberately attending a gathering with an infected person to test whether the coronavirus was real.

    In her statements to news organizations, Dr. Appleby said the man had told his nurse that he attended a Covid party. Just before he died, she said the patient told his nurse: “I think I made a mistake. I thought this was a hoax, but it’s not.”

    ==

    ‘The curve is no longer flat’: Nearly half of Florida’s ICUs are at least 90% full

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/07/09/coronavirus-florida-nearly-half-states-icus-least-90-full/5409773002/

    ===

    from An ICU boss in the hardest-hit part of Italy says many patients who recover from COVID-19 still have ‘chronic damage’

    https://www.businessinsider.com/head-icu-bergamo-italy-epicentre-lifelong-damage-recovered-covid-patients-2020-7

    He did not specify how many were affected. Several studies have shown problems in patients who had COVID-19 but have yet to reach firm conclusions.

    A July 8 study from University College London observed delirium, rare brain inflammation, and strokes in recovered COVID-19 patients.

    Issues with the gut, heart, and kidneys have also been reported after recovery, Independent reported, citing doctors and researchers. Experts are also concerned about effects on the mental health of severely ill patients.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Whats that line from The Hunt For Red October? You guys know the one i mean.

    November cant come soon enough. Jeezus.

    w
    v

    in reply to: tweets n stuff … 7/6 thru 7/13 #117956
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

Viewing 30 posts - 19,951 through 19,980 (of 47,639 total)