Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 44,881 through 44,910 (of 47,012 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RamView, 12/21/2014: Giants 37, Rams 27 (Long) #14582
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    and I don’t like his approach in the Red Zone.

    I agree with a lot of what you say, but I disagree with this.

    When Schott had Bradford, the Rams passing game ranked 1st or 2nd in the league in terms of the percentage of TDs on attempts inside the 10. It was close to 50%. He was also known as a hot redzone coordinator with the Jets, too.

    I think it’s one of his strengths.

    Whenever I see anyone complain about Schott in the redzone, invariably, what I saw with the play in question is execution issues. Or, people forgetting the trend and fixing on one or 2 plays they didn’t like. I’ve also been in a lot of discussions on different boards where some people will say “you never ever run THAT play down there” and invariably I come up with examples of teams running that play down there.

    in reply to: Fisher, 12/22 … transcript #14572
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    But, the elephant in the room is that the defense didn’t play well. Even with mistakes, the offense did play well enough to win. But, the defense has to get pressure on Eli Manning in this game

    Yeah I don’t get this focus on the offense. Even with a banged-up OL starting a rookie LOT and Hill being streaky, they did enough to win.

    It was the defense that lost that game.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Bradford’s health cannot be trusted! Betting another season on him would be irresponsible.

    But, I think everyone pretty much assumes that. It’s a given.

    The dominant position, on this board anyway, is go with Bradford, bring back Hill or Davis or both, draft a guy.

    I don’t think one person in the entire universe assumes they put it all on Bradford alone and just hope for it.

    BUT if he does come back and play well with someone else because the Rams let him go…what a bloody mistake.

    They can and probably will hedge all their bets every direction. Signee, Bradford, draft pick. They will do all 3. That’s the vibe I get.

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat Seattle? #14559
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    So this is a completely open thing, I think.

    Maybe so. Maybe not. Could be. You never know.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I think the title is a bit misleading. It should be, this is a good year to fix your offensive line and a bad year to draft a QB. imo Basically, he doesn’t believe that they can redo a favorable contract with Bradford.</span>

    Not sure why he thinks that.

    There’s 2 possibilities, at least, for him thinking that.

    1. Bradford’s agent is circulating the news that they aren’t favorable to a team-friendly type extension

    2. Lande is just randomly speculating based on nothing.

    in reply to: game reactions from around the net #14547
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The Rams have no true leaders.

    They have no take charge leaders on the team that truly command respect, that the team follows.

    When you’re “so called” leader(s) is in the middle of scrums, as a combatant rather than an officer, you gotta problem.

    Too many times we have seen this team lose their composure and focus on the task. They become more concerned with showing how tough they are outside the lines, or after the whistle.

    There is absolutely no question in my mind, that this team needs real veteran leaders.

    Too many cocky young hotheads that want to celebrate a 25yd play. WTF is that when you’re getting your arse whipped??

    This team is just poorly coached, and poorly constructed.

    I;ve thought that too.

    in reply to: Arians leaning toward starting rookie Logan Thomas #14545
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    How funny.Arians deserved what he got yesterday.They just crushed his big ego.Now I see why it took so long for him to be a head coach.

    lol

    That’s the spirit!

    in reply to: Fisher, 12/22 … transcript #14543
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well, i think he’s in complete denial about which team
    was playing dirty on Sunday.

    I don’t know about that. Listen to the (recently posted) new Jeff Fisher show.

    in reply to: The Jeff Fisher Show – December 22, 2014 #14542
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is a good listen.

    in reply to: Fisher, 12/22 … transcript #14538
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Some interesting stuff in there.

    w
    v

    Such as?

    (See this is me fostering conversation.)

    in reply to: Giants game reaction thread #14536
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    So the play of Hill the past few games means we cant make the playoffs with him even if he is surrounded by talent.

    I think that’s harsh. I think there’s a “win ugly” factor with Hill, but if the defense showed up against the Giants, he played well enough to win.

    I think some fans get “trauma fixation.” They see a bad play, and it becomes a black hole sucking in every other thought. I too was disappointed when Hill missed long throws. But he made enough throws to win. That scoring drive that got them to 20 points was Hill in rhythm.

    This team is supposed to play defense. It’s not supposed to be the Broncos.

    in reply to: reporters etc. autopsy the GIANTS game #14522
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Ten Takeaways from Rams’ 37-27 Loss to Giants

    By Randy Karraker

    http://www.101sports.com/2014/12/22/ten-takeaways-rams-37-27-loss-giants/

    On a day that the Rams clinched their eighth straight losing season, but did earn ESPN’s top play with Darren Bates’ spectacular blocked field goal in the fourth quarter, there were more negatives to discuss than positives. And here are 10 takeaways from the Rams 37-27 loss to the Giants…
    alec ogletree

    Ogletree’s late hit on Beckham Jr. started a brawl in the first half

    1) The Rams clearly have some fight. We saw that during the late second quarter rumble as Alec Ogletree roughed up Giants receiver Odell Beckham Jr. out of bounds. William Hayes got involved trying to defend Ogletree, who had been kicked by Beckham. T.J. McDonald and Rodney McLeod, along with James Laurinaitis and Janoris Jenkins and the rest of the defense, got into the heated battle. It happened last season in Carolina and in Seattle at the end of the season. The Rams have passion and desire and will defend their mates to the end, but sometimes that comes at the expense of team success. I love the passion, but I hope it can be lassoed and utilized as a force for good on the field, rather than a mechanism that results in a street brawl.

    2) It was a terrible day for the defensive backs. Eli Manning was an astounding 25-32 for 391 yards and three touchdowns without an interception, resulting in a 148.8 passer rating. He was 16-18 for 200 yards and a score in the first half. Certainly, Manning couldn’t miss. But it was rather remarkable how often he had receivers running free down the field.

    The Rams didn’t have an interception, and came close to just one pick. He came into the game with thirteen interceptions and had been sacked 27 times, going only two games (at Dallas and Tennessee) without being sacked. Nobody in the front seven had a sack, with T.J. McDonald recording the only one for the Rams. Once again a miscommunication left an opposing receiver wide open for a long touchdown, and ultimately poor pass defense let the Rams down.

    3) Where was the defense vs. the run? Jeff Fisher and his regime have drafted and signed defensive players to play in the NFC West and stop guys like Frank Gore and Marshawn Lynch. And indeed, the Rams have been sensational against the run for most of the second half of the season. But on this day, Giant running backs ran 30 times for 131 yards. The defense certainly didn’t slow the run down. The Giants were able to dictate to the Rams defense, which is something that shouldn’t happen with so much physical talent on that side of the ball.

    4) Why was Scott Wells playing, anyway? Wells had a high snap that caused quarterback Shaun Hill to panic and overthrow Stedman Bailey late in the first half, then delivered another high snap that went over Hill’s head and caused a fumble that snuffed any Rams comeback chances. The Rams came into the game with a record of 6-8, out of playoff contention. They used a 4th round pick on center Barrett Jones last year, and Fisher admitted that Wells has been fighting through some elbow issues. Why isn’t Jones getting an opportunity? With all due respect to Wells, he turns 34 on January 7 and has not played to the level expected when he signed a free agent contract with the Rams before the 2012 season. If he’s hurt, or is going to play like that, why not give Jones a chance to see if he can play next year? I’d like to see Jones and Brandon Washington…although you might not want to play them at Seattle, either. I think Fisher and his staff missed a chance to see some young talent against the Giants.
    odell beckham jr

    Beckham Jr.’s antics drew several penalties against the Rams.

    5) The Rams were easily offended by Odell Beckham Jr. When asked why the Rams were jawing with Beckham Jr., Fisher said “I don’t know. Someone said he said came out and said he was going to set an NFL record today against the defense early this morning. I was told that, I don’t know. But he’s an outstanding player. He’s a very, very good player and he’s going to be hard to stop over the years.” Seriously? A rookie says he’s going to set a record and your feelings are hurt? Are you kidding? That’s ridiculous. After T.J. McDonald took a taunting penalty because of his involvement with Beckham late in the first half, Mark Barron came out during a time out to calm him down. The Giants scored on their next play. Beckham’s taunt after his first touchdown most certainly helped cause the fracas in the second quarter, when Ogletree manhandled him. If receivers know they can get into the Rams head with antics like that, the Rams are going to see that every week.

    Apparently this group didn’t spend enough time with and learn enough from Cortland Finnegan.

    6) The Rams and their fans have now suffered eight straight losing seasons. Even the Raiders have had a couple of 8-8’s in that time. The gold standard of late for St. Louis has been the Scott Linehan/Jim Haslett club that went 8-8 in 2006. Do we know bad football? The last team to have a streak this long was the St. Louis/Arizona Cardinals, who had nine straight losing years between 1985-1993. Of course, 1985-’87 were their last three years in St. Louis. So in our last 23 seasons of NFL football in St. Louis, we’ve had four winning seasons, and seventeen losing ones. And folks wonder why people don’t want to spend their hard earned money on going to the Dome.

    7) Kenny Britt had a huge play and a great day. With 4:13 left in the first half, Hill was flushed from the pocket, rolled right, and appeared to throw the ball away. But Britt appeared from nowhere to make a brilliant, 27 yard sideline catch and help set up a Rams touchdown moments later. He finished with nine catches for 103 yards. Britt leads Rams wide receivers with 44 catches for 710 yards. He deserves a contract for next year.

    Cool There were more devastating penalties. The Rams committed “only’ nine penalties for 76 yards…compared to the Giants 12-149. McDonald’s penalty was tough. But with 10:28 to go in the game and the Giants ahead 30-20, they lined up to punt on a 4th and 1 from the Rams 46. Incomprehensibly, veteran Kendall Langford jumped offsides, giving the Giants a first down that led to their final touchdown and a 37-20 advantage. Even though the volume of penalties is down a bit, their effects are still as great.
    jeff fisher

    Fisher’s job is likely safe heading into 2015.

    9) Is Fisher on the hot seat? I got question on Twitter a couple of times. No, and he shouldn’t be. A good franchise simply can’t continue to churn through regimes every three years and hope eventually it’s going to work out. The Giants should be a model for the Rams. So should the Steelers.

    Fisher took over an untenable situation in which nearly half the players on the roster he took over didn’t even make it to a training camp the next year. He heads into year four of the project. Are things perfect? Certainly not. But this is a franchise that needs stability on the football side. Giants fans have wanted Tom Coughlin fired several times, before the team won Super Bowls. I would have to believe that many Cowboys fans wanted Jason Garrett fired after they finished 8-8 for the third straight year last year, but now he’s working out pretty well at 11-4 and as NFC East champs.

    I don’t think Fisher’s seat should be hot…or even warm…heading into the off-season.

    10) To fill up the stadium, the Rams need their product to be better. As has been mentioned, the Rams have eight straight losing seasons and finished 3-5 at home this year. This after they went 5-3 at home last year. Fisher is 11-12 at the Dome (one home game was in London) and 20-26-1 overall heading into week seventeen. While that’s a dramatic improvement over the 15-65 before he got here, reality is that NFL teams need to win to fill the stadium. If the Rams can reach a deal to remain in St. Louis, they need to know that the novelty of a new edifice lasts only so long. Eventually, if you’re going to be selling a product, that product needs to be of quality for people to buy it…even if it is the only game in town. If the losing persists, people aren’t going to buy…wherever the team plays. The Cardinals and Blues have learned this; the Redskins, Raiders and Buccaneers know it too. Winning sells.

    in reply to: RamView, 12/21/2014: Giants 37, Rams 27 (Long) #14517
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    All reminds me of a young person I work with who apologized in email for losing his composer.

    I replied, you mean composure, right?

    So I would say, in this game, the Rams lost their composer.

    in reply to: RamView, 12/21/2014: Giants 37, Rams 27 (Long) #14511
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Yeah, except i blame Fisher for the mule kick
    and you want to make injured-mule excuses.

    w
    v

    Wait, what? Hunh? I’ve always said you’re SUPPOSED TO injure mules.

    You don’t listen.

    in reply to: RamView, 12/21/2014: Giants 37, Rams 27 (Long) #14508
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    If i was ta boil the entire game
    down to one play, i think it might be
    the Josh Brown mule-kick
    of Cody Davis.

    w
    v

    Yeah the game was full of unusual special teams plays.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I think we just disagree about the OLine
    and Fisher’s personnel decisions.

    w
    v

    You know I was joking, right? s

    I don’t think we disagree about the OL…on that we may be parsing small differences. I just have this automatic thing over the years about people not counting OL injuries as related to performance. It’s my Niagra Falls. Or…one of them.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I dont think we can say the “rams would have won 27-20″ if
    we subtract the mistakes. We have no idea
    what the road-team-with-a-losing-record
    would have done if the situations
    had been altered.

    w
    v

    Are we in a board war? I need to know if we are. Cause if we are, I drink more coffee. If not, I settle for diet ginger ale.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Aeneas said anytime a team comes in and
    sticks to the RUN, they are able to
    handle the Rams D.

    w
    v

    Either way, last game, if Rams don’t make mistakes on special teams and in coverage–which led directly to 17 points–they beat the Giants 27-20. That’s with all the aforementioned problems in the post-loss multiplication of problems people see: run D, chippiness and discipline, below par OL play, etc.

    in reply to: This is a poorly coached team. #14494
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    zn wrote:
    To me Bradford has amply proven himself already. In the last 2 years, when this team has had both a relatively healthy OL (ie not up to 3 injury replacements a la the first half of 2012) AND a running threat (ie. not Richardson) Bradford has played well. Played well enough to reach “proven himself” status. That is, in 2012/13, in the games meeting that description (relatively healthy OL + running threat), Bradford has averaged a qb rating of 92.2, along with 1.8 TDs per game & 0.67 INTs per game, and a near 50% TDs on attempts inside the 10. And that was without the improved 2014 receivers and Mason. The issue with Bradford is health.

    What are Dalton’s numbers like in Cincinnati? I think he has good stats too but I do not think that anyone would say that he has proven himself yet. I hope that Sam comes back next year and lights it up. I think he has the ability to do it. It was so much fun watching the Rams with Warner and then Bulger at the helm. I just miss it man. I miss it. We gotta get it back. If only Cleveland had made that FG attempt the season before the Luck draft.

    I didn’t BASE THAT on numbers, but numbers validate it. Bradford’s way better than Dalton according to any test you want to offer, but what he doesn’t have is AJ Green. He had Amendola and Gibson. I would say Bradford has proven himself to the point where just watching the games and looking at the numbers back it. That’s what I saw. Provided, as I said, he has both a relatively healthy qb and a running threat. That’s mostly because every qb does better with a relatively healthy OL and most do better with a running threat.

    Bulger and Warner had years of Bruce and Holt and a stable OL, until the stable OLs ran out in 2007. Bradford never had the weapons they had. Warner is the best of the 3 but Bradford would have done as well as Bulger if not better IMO if he had even just the Rams 2014 WRs.

    Heck in the span of games I am talking about…where he had the things I say he needed (OL, running threat) he has 4 comeback games and was the qb of an offense that beat (from memory, I think the number is) 8 top 12 defenses.

    Luck is a rare type, like once a decade, but Bradford could be at least as good as Eli and Flacco at their best — if not better — if he is healthy.

    in reply to: This is a poorly coached team. #14487
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I hear you ZN but there were concerns about those signings when they happened, so it was Fisher and Snead’s choices to go with who they got. It was often said that the Rams got ‘inexpensively,’ and the Dolphis let go of, Long because of injury concerns. My buddy that is a Packers fan chuckled when I told him we signed Wells. Barksdale has not had a good year this season. Why draft Jones if he has to “bulk” up, and then the bulking up led to him getting hurt and needing back surgery? The Raiders apparently knew what they were doing in not signing Saffold because of his shoulder. So I understand that the Rams have been unfortunate with all the injuries, but they chose all of these guys despite them all having question marks. So the Rams have to shoulder some of the blame.

    Regarding yesterday’s game. In the moment I was very unhappy but know that the turnovers prevented the Rams from having a chance to win. Now I could argue that the turnovers, although unusual, were commited by questionable personnel that the Rams chose to have on their team. T. Austin has been a major disappointment to me and his missed catch was just another example to me that he cannot play in this league. Cunningham has been a good KR so I cannot really fault him too much for his fumble. He has been pretty good with ball security since that phantom fumble he had last year.

    For QBs, yes they had their QB but it could be argued that despite Bradfor having good numbers last season he still was not winning enough games. He was not a difference maker. He still needs to prove that he can be a reason they consistently win. I like Bradford and want him to be a 16-game starter for the Rams next season. But up to this point he has not proven himself. I think they should have had a better back up plan for the future. For comparison it will be interesting to see what the Cardinals do with QB this offseason because Palmer now has had 2 ACLs.

    I disagree. Long was not gotten cheaply, for one. He got the ordinary avg. hit you get for a guy in his position. Wells was fine to start off and is playing hurt. Long was never a nifty left side pass protector but he was a great run blocking LOT, and arm injuries are not predictors of leg injuries.

    I have no problem with Austin. But now we’re getting into loss trauma syndrome. Him missing that one catch in a loss everyone is upset about exaggerates his issues.

    Yeah the rare special teams turnover didn’t help but they lost because a young secondary (with Joyner forced into the action when Gaines got hurt) blew a coverage, and there were other blown coverages as well.

    To me Bradford has amply proven himself already. In the last 2 years, when this team has had both a relatively healthy OL (ie not up to 3 injury replacements a la the first half of 2012) AND a running threat (ie. not Richardson) Bradford has played well. Played well enough to reach “proven himself” status. That is, in 2012/13, in the games meeting that description (relatively healthy OL + running threat), Bradford has averaged a qb rating of 92.2, along with 1.8 TDs per game & 0.67 INTs per game, and a near 50% TDs on attempts inside the 10. And that was without the improved 2014 receivers and Mason. The issue with Bradford is health.

    in reply to: The Winston QB issue #14485
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The difference is, Phillips was abusive toward women. I have not seen that with Winston. Winston’s issues, I believe is more wrong place at wrong time, those things he’ll learn from.

    He is accused of sexual assault and stood on a table in public yelling obscenities about women.

    He may not be a physical abuser the way Phillips was but there are many different kinds of fukkked up misogynists out there.

    There is no excusing Winston.

    in reply to: This is a poorly coached team. #14483
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    other teams found their QBs (Seattle) and rebuilt their OLs (Dallas) so Fisher has to be held accountable for not having done that to this point. He also has to be held accountable for the faux-toughness. The trash talking and cheap shots have to go. McDonald almost decapitated Gaines yesterday because he was trying to layout Beckham when the pass had already been made incomplete.

    I agree about the trash-talking. I feel exactly the same way.

    On the OL? They signed Long, they signed Wells, they found Barksdale, they drafted Jones, they drafted Robinson. Both Long and Wells played fine when first signed. What they encountered was a series of injuries. Demoff has even said that OL injuries are the Rams achilles heel. Because of injuries, Long is done, Robinson is at LOT instead LOG as a rookie, and Saffold Wells AND Joseph are playing banged up. And Jones is no use to them because he had back surgery and lost muscle because he could not lift after the surgery.

    And they didn’t have to find a qb, they had one. He then became the 1st qb we have ever heard of in all NFL history who injured the same ACL in under 12 months.

    I thought they would have won yesterday even with the banged up OL because Hill, though he started shakey, settled in. So I don’t think qb was the issue yesterday. They lost because of a rare special teams turnover and then a regression into the “blown coverages” scenarios from earlier in the season.

    in reply to: This is a poorly coached team. #14472
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    zn wrote:

    canadaram wrote:
    don’t know who screwed up on the second Beckham TD, Joyner or Johnson, but it looked like Joyner to me.

    That was Joyner, according to Joyner.

    Oh well. His first real playing time in over a month, coming right after the injury to Gaines. Rookie CBs and rookie QBs make the most costly types of errors.

    Plus a couple of the guys in the secondary are playing over their heads in the first place. Like, arguably, McCleod.

    That also means that amidst the youth, there is no clear top-gun leader. Seattle has a young secondary too, but here’s the difference. First, Earl Thomas is a rare grade-A level team leader type, along with being immensely talented. He is their Ray Lewis or London Fletcher (Fletcher isn’t at Lewis’s level as a player but he was, says Martz, the heart of the Rams defense). Second, the Seahawks play it the opposite of the Rams–whereas the Rams have a lot of “system” to learn, Seattle keeps their defense basic.

    I think the Rams could have a good secondary if they mature and maybe if they added another player or 2, but they did not end up with a Thomas, plus a Sherman and a Chancellor. It can be good but it won’t be that caliber.

    And in the meanwhile, we can all name the games where huge coverage errors in the secondary arguably cost them games. Sometimes Jenkins is the culprit, sometimes McCleod, sometimes Joyner. Even Gaines let a TD get past him early this season where he just got beat badly. We can even evoke the memories by naming all the receivers who did it–Bryant, Lloyd, Floyd, Beckham.

    in reply to: This is a poorly coached team. #14470
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    don’t know who screwed up on the second Beckham TD, Joyner or Johnson, but it looked like Joyner to me.

    That was Joyner, according to Joyner.

    in reply to: This is a poorly coached team. #14468
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I really am getting tired of excuses like injuries—if Wells can’t play where is his back-up? Who is the next man up?

    Well first there was Turner but he left. He played better with the Rams than with the Titans and got benched. Then there was Jones but he had to bulk up. He did, then injured his back, had surgery, and as a result could not lift, and therefore regressed physically. Barnes? Well I suppose if they were happy with Barnes as starter material, they would not have gotten Jones.

    But even with 3 interior linemen playing hurt, and a rookie at LOT, and the line clearly struggling, they put up 27 points and Hill hit 75% of his throws.

    So I think what happens is, with a loss, people highlight every problem.

    Even with the OL struggling they still could have won. They put up 27. But they lost and now in a lot of peoples’s minds, everything is wrong. Including, why can’t this team be the only one in the NFL to overcome having 2 centers affected by injuries. s Seriously. How many teams are 3 deep at center with a quality 3rd ready to play?

    In my entire history following this team, fans are angriest when the team raises expectations and then collapses in a bad loss or losses. So for example, in 2010, expectations were high, and then they lost on the road in Seattle. The feeling was so bad after that that many, if not most, did not pause to notice that in 2011, the Rams were losing because of a massive injury epidemic the likes of which we have never seen (according to Football Outsiders, that was the most injured offense in the league since 2002, and that’s not even counting the defense). At the end of 2006 they came on strong, then in 2007 the OL lost 10 starters to injuries, including 4 for the season, and most did not count the injuries…they just began beating on Linehan and Bulger.

    Of these 3 cases, I thought Linehan deserved it, in spite of the injuries. I thought Spags was a victim of circumstances but was fine with Kroenke getting his own guy. I think Fisher will push through this and have winning seasons.

    in reply to: Marshall Faulk: Grade the Rams' Front Office #14462
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    zn wrote:
    Are those the same thing? Record, competitiveness?

    I am disappointed by the loss too, but I don’t see it as darkly as you do.

    Well, I’ll tell you what. I’d like to see an argument to try to disprove the claim that our record this year reflects our competitiveness.

    Generally, you are what your record says you are. Rare exceptions, yes. But we are what we saw today. That’s who we are. The good days are far more anomalous than today was.

    Well I don’t want this to be semantics. So I will abandon the whole “record/competitiveness” thing, which though I initiated it, now sounds too dangerously abstract for me.

    As for coming up with an argument, I have rarely if ever been in a discussion about a team’s whole season where there’s a single, simple, nailed-down answer and all the rest doesn’t measure up. I think what we have HERE is zn’s take v. RFL’s take, with neither one in a position to bet the farm on it. In fact I think the glory of these discussions is how different people see things different ways, and then you can see the range of insights. The range is more important to me than the author. Because, like quantum physics, there’s only so much you can really know…but it’s interesting to see what the RANGE is. (And as a fan of internet discussion, I honestly appreciate the process.)

    But, today for example. The same thing reared its ugly head–a blown coverage in the secondary by a young player who gives up an easy TD.

    That’s just when they pull within 7 and Hill and Mason are finally in gear. And–by his own admission–Joyner blows a coverage on the 80 yard Beckham TD.

    First, injuries (Gaines goes out Joyner comes in). Then, the big game-killing mistake. That kind of thing has dogged this team all season–inopportune blown coverages by a young secondary.

    It also doesn’t help that the OL is ragged and playing like it.

    But take all the things people are complaining about–the chippiness, the undisciplined actions, and if their coverage were sound, they would still be in the game. In fact, the Giants committed more penalties than the Rams, and Coughlin was complaining about his own team’s chippiness, and they won. Heck the Rams offense scored 27 points and could have won even with the OL a mess right now (they are starting 3 injured players and a rookie LOT). You subtract the points by Beckham on the 80 yarder and the points they got after the Randle 49 yarder, and the game is tied.

    Okay so why does the secondary make so many game-killing mistakes. To me that’s obvious. They’re young, a couple of them like McCleod are playing over their heads (and that’s not always sustainable), and they do not have this system mastered.

    So some, perhaps you (if I read you right) see the mistakes and chalk it up to coaching. That makes it inherent, or so it appears. A team with Fisher and Wms, from that view, can never become stable and consistent. I see it differently. I don’t think it’s the coaching, I think it’s execution. To me, that means that once the players become synced in, their prospects improve. We get more games like the Denver game, and fewer games like the Giants and Dallas games.

    Now SHOULD THEY be synced in by now? To me that’s just opinion. Should Wms have dialed it back? Should Snead have already given them an all-pro secondary? TO ME, just in my place on the range of opinions, THAT all sounds like impossible standards.

    There’s more to say about this but this discussion, I suspect, will take months and include many voices, so…that’s enough from me for tonight, I think.

    in reply to: Marshall Faulk: Grade the Rams' Front Office #14458
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I see no evidence of any genuine improvement in the team as a competitive unit. None. In fact, this year we will actually REGRESS in our record, and it will be richly deserved.

    Are those the same thing? Record, competitiveness?

    I am disappointed by the loss too, but I don’t see it as darkly as you do.

    in reply to: reporters etc. autopsy the GIANTS game #14452
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Little consolation for the Rams

    By Joe Lyons

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/little-consolation-for-the-rams/article_415635d1-deb3-5abd-b929-fd337b798c31.html

    Before they took an offensive snap Sunday afternoon, the Rams found themselves in a 10-0 hole.

    And they never completely recovered, losing 37-27 to the New York Giants in their home finale at the Edward Jones Dome.

    “It wasn’t us in any phase of the game — offense, defense or special teams,’’ tackle Joe Barksdale said. “I know it sounds cliche, but we have to be better. There’s no excuse….’’

    Quarterback Shaun Hill felt the same way.

    “To be honest with you, if I didn’t know any better and I saw what I’d just watched, I’d say this was a bad team,’’ he said. “But we’re not a bad team. We’ve beat some of the best teams in the NFL and we’ve been in almost every game we’ve played this season. Generally, we’re not a team that beats ourselves, but today, that’s exactly what we did.

    “I know the makeup of this team, and that’s what makes a game like today so frustrating.’’

    On offense, the Rams had their moments. They finished with 387 yards and had 23 first downs to just 19 for the Giants. Hill turned in a solid game, completing 24 of 32 passes for 290 yards with touchdown passes to tight end Lance Kendricks (23 yards) and wide receiver Chris Givens (47 yards). His passer rating was 110.2.

    Rookie running back Tre Mason ran 13 times for 76 yards, averaging 5.8 a carry, and scored on a 10-yard run. Wide receiver Kenny Britt was targeted 11 times and finished with nine catches and 103 yards.

    “The only number that matters is the final score and obviously we didn’t come up with the number we needed there,’’ guard Davin Joseph said. “It’s a team effort and we just didn’t get it done. We just made too many mistakes, and we always seemed to make them at the wrong time.’’

    Mason added: “If you don’t get the ‘W,’ any other numbers are meaningless. We were mediocre and hurt ourselves with a lot of self-inflicted wounds.’’

    After the Giants took a 3-0 lead, the Rams’ Benny Cunningham fumbled the ensuing kickoff. It was his first fumble of the season. Five plays later, New York was up 10-0.

    “Being down, especially that early, I don’t think it changes the mindset,’’ Hill said. “Every possession, you’re looking to put points on the board.’’

    The Rams did just that, getting a 51-yard field goal from Greg Zuerlein to make it 10-3. But on the Rams’ next possession, a Hill pass went off the hands of Tavon Austin. It was picked off by the Giants’ Kerry Wynn and led to a field goal and a 13-3 Giants lead.

    The Giants were up 20-3 when Mason scored after taking a pitch around the left end for a 10-yard TD with just over two minutes to play in the first half. The Rams got the ball back and drove to the New York 2 before a high snap on third down threw off the play’s timing and forced Hill to throw the ball away. Zuerlein’s field goal as time expired made it 20-13 Giants at the half.

    “Offensively, we didn’t have the ball much in the first half,’’ Rams coach Jeff Fisher said. “But we felt good (at halftime). We had the ball (to start the second half); just needed to make some plays, get some points, create a turnover, maybe get to the quarterback.

    “But those things didn’t happen.’’

    With the Rams down 27-13, Hill threw a well-placed ball to Kendricks for a 23-yard touchdown. Less than a minute later, however, the Giants scored on an 80-yard bomb to re-establish control at 34-20.

    “You’re not going to beat an NFL team when you’re making crucial mistakes at key times and that’s exactly what happened to us today,’’ Hill said. “I’m sure when we look at the film we’ll see guys who played well, who made plays, but right now, it’s hard to come up with a lot of positives.’’

    The Rams trailed 37-20 when Hill found Givens for a 47-yard touchdown with 3:56 to play. The Rams’ Daren Bates blocked a field goal to give his team a final chance, but another errant snap went over the head of Hill. The Giants recovered and ran out the clock.

    “I’ll have to get a look at the film and see what happened,’’ Hill said. Fisher noted that center Scott Wells “has been fighting through’’ an elbow injury.

    Several Rams admitted to hearing the late-game boos in the home finale.

    “This is a fan-driven league,’’ Hill said. “We like to give them what they pay good money to come see. At the same time, there’s a lot of blood, sweat and tears on our end. I can promise you that.

    “We share their frustration.’’

    The Rams close the season Sunday in Seattle against the defending Super Bowl champion Seahawks.

    “We’re gonna come back strong, no question about that,’’ Joseph said

    in reply to: reporters etc. autopsy the GIANTS game #14451
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Late hit by Ogletree triggers brawl

    By Jim Thomas

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/late-hit-by-ogletree-triggers-brawl/article_6a6e62c7-4849-5ad6-b261-a5f461902c56.html

    Safety T.J. McDonald said the Rams’ defense plays with an edge. In Sunday’s 37-27 loss to the New York Giants, the defense went over the edge.

    Penalties for late hits by McDonald and linebacker Alec Ogletree in the first half both came for roughing up Giants wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr. out of bounds. The second one, by Ogletree, precipitated a bench-clearing fracas on the New York sideline.

    “I hit him in-bounds,” Ogletree said. “Whatever happened after that, it is what it is. I don’t know.”

    The problem was, Ogletree kept hitting Beckham until he was several yards out of bounds, drawing the flag. Beckham responded by throwing the football at Ogletree’s face. Ogletree tried to strike back, and the next thing you know there were a couple of dozen players from both teams going at it.

    Ogletree didn’t offer up much of an explanation on his miscue.

    “Like I said, it’s over with now,” he said. “I hated that it happened, but I can’t do nothing about it now.”

    By the time referee Pete Morelli and his crew cleaned things up, three players were ejected: defensive end Williams Hayes of the Rams, and wide receiver Preston Parker and defensive end Damontre’ Moore of the Giants.

    Hayes said he was ejected for throwing a punch in the scuffle, which occurred with 2 minutes, 10 seconds to go in the half.

    “I was running to the ball,” Hayes said. “When I saw the flag go up, I started walking back to the huddle. And then I saw somebody just come in and blast ‘Tree’ in the back. So I was going over there to try to take care of the situation, to get ‘Tree’ up out of there.

    “Next thing I know, somebody grabbed me. I turned around, my helmet came off, a guy threw a punch at me, then I just retaliated.”

    Hayes spent the rest of the game in the Rams’ locker room.

    “I just sat in here with my head down,” Hayes said. “It’s tough. I wanted to go out there and fight with my brothers, and I wasn’t able to. It’s just a bad situation.”

    BECKHAM’S DAY

    The Rams may have been riled up because, according to coach Jeff Fisher, “Someone said (Beckham) came out and said he was going to set an NFL record today against the defense early this morning. I was told that. I don’t know.”

    Actually, Beckham did set a couple of Giants franchise records Sunday after catching eight passes for 148 yards and two TDs. He now has 11 TD catches for the season, which is a Giants rookie record. And his 79 catches also set a Giants single-season rookie mark.

    It also was the eighth consecutive game for the rookie from LSU with at least 90 receiving yards.

    JOYNER PLAYS

    Cornerback and safety Lamarcus Joyner, who had missed the past five games — the first few because of a groin injury — was active Sunday for the Rams. Things could’ve gone better. Joyner was part of a busted coverage that led to Beckham’s second TD, an 80-yard score in the final minute of the third quarter.

    With Beckham and Rueben Randle split out to the right, both Joyner and Trumaine Johnson took the underneath route (Randle). That left Beckham free to run downfield with only safety Mark Barron to beat, which he did for the TD.

    SITTING IT OUT

    With a largely healthy roster, there were few surprises on the team’s inactive list, which consisted of CB Marcus Roberson, TE Justice Cunningham, C/G Barrett Jones, OG Brandon Washington, TE Alex Bayer, DT Alex Carrington and DE Ethan Westbrooks.

    INJURY UPDATE

    Rams cornerback E.J. Gaines left in the second half with concussion symptoms and a lacerated lip.

    in reply to: We will be drafting a QB nextyear. #14450
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    zn wrote:
    Jack. You’re not the GM. For all you know … that is, REALLY know… every thing you list would be the worst possible way to approach it.

    We’ll see. s

    Barksdale is not a problem. Jerry is a pretty good LG that would be good for us. Grabbing some depth at Guard in the 2nd round, is not a good thing. Plus, we desperately need a QB. Watching Hill and Austin was frightening. I don’t believe Sam is capable of playing a full season, no matter what. If Winston slides to us, we should nab him. This kid can play. We have to believe he is alot better than what we have backing up. If Sam can play for a year or two, without hitting the IR, which I doubt, but if he does, it is better for us, because we have two QBs. One we can hold off and groom if need to.

    Okay…yeah it’s fun to play GM. Well I agree that watching Davis was frightening, after he came down to earth. Today though the problem was defense (after a shakey start Hill was 24 of 32 for 2 TDs and a qb rating of 110.2). I don’t believe for a second that any rookie qb will be better than what they have in year one. I agree that they will draft one. As for the OL, IMO they will do what they always do–draft some, sign some, pick up some cuts and waivers. These coaches have fielded good OLs before that were built overnight, they will do it again. In my abjectly humble opinion.

    We’ll see.

Viewing 30 posts - 44,881 through 44,910 (of 47,012 total)