Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
znModeratorBradford and his agent were unwilling to re-do his deal. I believe based on a conversation with Mike Silver and some locals that the reality of that brought this trade about. The Rams, rightly I think were unwilling to bring Sam back under the old deal.
The question I have right now is if Sam signs a new lower deal with Philly is whether or not he just wanted out of St. Louis
Looked at from another perspective, there’s 2 sides to the money. It’s like the Eagles and the Rams divided the legacy of the old CBA.
For Phil–13 M is a bargain for a young starting caliber QB in his 6th year. Under the new CBA, qbs come up after year 4. If the guy is your starter and you want to keep him, those kinds of contracts (2nd contract for a starting qb) are averaging 19 M. Wilson will probably get more. That means guys like Kaepernick and Dalton are averaging 19 M. The reason that Bradford is only 13 M is because under the old CBA, you could sign a guy for 6 years.
For the Rams–they would be paying 16 M, for a guy they paid for 2 years for 7 starts. Under the old CBA, they had to pay big dollars even to have him on the squad.
I think the smarter thing would have been to extend him with an incentives and roster bonuses laden deal. In fact Bradford said he was open to an extension. I actually thought they WOULD do that…I thought that was the route they would take. I don’t know why they didn’t explore that.
As for the trade? If Foles plays well, then, it’s obviously okay for the Rams. I mean the Eagles paid to get Bradford. So if Foles plays well, then, the Rams have a qb plus extras.
znModeratorfrom off the net
===
jrry32
Foles’s arm is averageish. IMO, he’s currently post elbow injury Carson Palmer(which caused Palmer to go from having a strong arm to averageish arm strength).(So Palmer from 2009 to now). Seems like people tend to overstate the arm strength of tall QBs. Might be because of their height, they can throw passes with less arc. But Foles’s arm strength is nothing special. He doesn’t have Flacco’s or even Bradford’s arm strength. Seems like people tend to overstate the arm strength of tall QBs. Might be because of their height, they can throw passes with less arc. But Foles’s arm strength is nothing special. He doesn’t have Flacco’s or even Bradford’s arm strength.
He has the potential to be more than that if he shores up his footwork and shows more consistency under pressure…if that happens, he can be like prime Matt Schaub or Matt Ryan.
Why a Ryan comparison? Ryan’s physical tools aren’t impressive(underwhelming mobility, average arm strength, etc.). He’s just a smart, instinctive, and accurate QB. Keep in mind that the knock on young Matt Ryan was that he was a poor deep thrower. Which is one of the big knocks on Foles.
znModeratorRams officially re-sign TE Lance Kendricks
By Nick Wagoner | ESPN.com
http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/
EARTH CITY, Mo. — The St. Louis Rams officially announced they have re-signed tight end Lance Kendricks on Wednesday night, a day after they had come to terms on the framework of a deal.
The Rams’ announcement did not disclose the terms of the deal but the original numbers that ESPN NFL Insider Adam Caplan and I reported Tuesday were four years and $18.5 million. It remains to be seen if those are the actual numbers and, of course, the guaranteed money is still unknown. Once we get those numbers, we’ll be sure to break them down right here.
In the meantime, the Rams are retaining a player that probably doesn’t draw a lot of attention but is considered vital to what the Rams do offensively and who they want to be. Tight ends coach Rob Boras has long been a major Kendricks’ supporter and his versatility undoubtedly was a reason the Rams wanted to keep him.
The Rams used a second-round pick on Kendricks in the 2011 NFL draft. In the time since, he has been something of a “Swiss Army knife,” playing all over the formation and even lining up at fullback at times. In 2014, the 27-year-old Kendricks had 27 catches for 259 yards with five touchdowns.
For his four-year career, Kendricks has 129 receptions for 1,388 yards and 13 scores.
March 11, 2015 at 7:03 pm in reply to: audio, 3-11-15 … Balzer, Greg Cosell, JT, Karraker, Miklasz, Martz #20132
znModeratorIs there any way the Rams can lose the Bradford/Foles trade? Bernie Miklasz joins The Fast Lane
March 11, 2015 at 7:02 pm in reply to: audio, 3-11-15 … Balzer, Greg Cosell, JT, Karraker, Miklasz, Martz #20130
znModeratorRandy Karraker calls in from vacation to give The Fast Lane his take on the Bradford/Foles trade
znModerator
Sam Bradford knew he might be tradedBy Marc Sessler
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000478276/article/sam-bradford-knew-he-might-be-traded
The Philadelphia Eagles had Sam Bradford on the mind for much longer than anyone realized.
Asked Wednesday if he was surprised about the swap that sent Nick Foles to the Rams in exchange for his services, the quarterback broke a little news.
“This had been in the works for a while,” Bradford said. “So it didn’t catch me totally by surprise when it happened yesterday.”
Pressed further, Bradford acknowledged that he “knew this was a possibility probably three, four weeks ago,” adding: “I think that (coach) Chip (Kelly) and the Eagles wanted me here, and I’m excited to be here.”
In essence, Rams officials sold us a heaping bill of goods at last month’s NFL Scouting Combine when coach Jeff Fisher insisted he was “counting on” Bradford and “betting on him” to rebound from back-to-back season-ending knee injuries. General manager Les Snead promised that St. Louis had zero desire to “delete” Bradford from the roster, before shipping him out of town.
To their credit, both Fisher and Snead obviously discussed the deal with Bradford ahead of time.
The trade reunites Bradford with offensive coordinator Pat Shurmur, who served as play-caller during Bradford’s rookie year with the Rams in 2010. The passer cited his “excellent relationship” with Shurmur before gushing over the chance to run Kelly’s up-tempo attack.
“I think any quarterback in this league would love to play for Chip in his offense,” Bradford said. “It’s extremely quarterback-friendly. The tape that I’ve watched, it just looks like it’s a lot of fun to play in. I think it’s similar to what I did in college at Oklahoma, so I’m extremely excited to be here and ready to get rolling.”
Also from Bradford:
1. The quarterback said he will “absolutely” attempt to recruit former college teammate DeMarco Murray to the Eagles. Chances are dimming on that deal, though, after Philly signed former Chargers runner Ryan Mathews to a three-year, $12 million deal.
2. Coming off back-to-back season-ending knee injuries, Bradford confirmed he would be ready to roll for training camp. He started his throwing program a few weeks ago, and doesn’t expect the knee to hold him back.
znModeratorThe Eagles have
a high-risk, high-reward QB now. Quite a gamble.
It could go either way. I thought it was telling
in that article up above that they have a lot of faith
in their conditioning and strength program. They think
they can keep SB healthy. I also think its interesting
just how much they admire his skill as a player.w
vI think all of that (quite obviously) was crucial in the entire trade thing. Kelly does a lot of new-fangled things with training and conditioning, and is kind of football new-agey in how he does things.
znModeratorfrom off the net
===
hammer
Seattle gave up a first round pick and center, Max Ungar for Graham and a 4th round pick. Is that too much? I hope so. Graham either under performed last year or is on a decline. Seems like Seattle over paid, unless Graham returns to form.
znModeratorMichael Silver @MikeSilver
I expect the Rams to re-sign WR Kenny Britt soon
March 11, 2015 at 6:26 pm in reply to: reporters on the trade (Wagoner, Thomas, Clayton, King, & many more) #20108
znModeratorfrom off the net
===
ramBRO
I caught a radio interview with ESPN’s KC Joyner wherein he discussed the Bradford trade. For those who don’t know, KC Joyner is the self-proclaimed “Football Scientist” who ranks player performance on metrics outside of typical stats. In other words, he applies “analytics” to football in the same way that Billy Bean might do so for baseball.
Although as a Rams fan I was interested in what Nick Foles would bring to our team, the radio hosts spent the entire segment having Joyner focus on what Chip Kelly saw in Sam Bradford. This is what he said:
1) Sam Bradford is a smart and “safe” QB who takes care of the football.
2) Bradford is also accurate with his deep ball.
Those were the primary benefits that Joyner listed. But he delved a little further. He indicated that people have a misconception of Chip Kelly’s offense thinking that it’s an up tempo passing attack. In reality, it’s an up tempo rushing attack that looks to take advantage of a tired/disorganized defense with passes – preferably vertical ones (hence the Bradford interest). Joyner said that Kelly’s offense is only effective with a strong rushing attack and that his WR’s need to be physical in order to block downfield (thus, no use for a Desean Jackson/Jeremy Maclin-types). Foles became careless with the ball last season and Kelly doesn’t believe that he’ll have that problem with Bradford.
The radio hosts inquired why the Eagles would trade away LeSean McCoy if they were looking to have a strong rushing attack and Joyner said that: A) they got a good defensive player in return (defense is the primary concern for the team); B ) RB’s are a dime a dozen (didn’t discuss losing out on Frank Gore); and, C) more cap space to go after his type of guys.
Again, there was little talk of the compensation for Bradford or his injury history. This was all about what the numbers told Joyner on why Kelly might like Bradford so much. And truth be told, it sounded as though Joyner liked the pick-up.
znModeratorJim Thomas @jthom1
G Justin Blalock does plan to visit Rams, but Detroit also in mix
March 11, 2015 at 5:08 pm in reply to: reporters on the trade (Wagoner, Thomas, Clayton, King, & many more) #20102
znModeratorSam Bradford: Trade to Philly has been in the works for weeks
by Michael David Smith
New Eagles quarterback Sam Bradford revealed today that he has known for weeks he was being shopped by the Rams, even as the Rams claimed that wasn’t the case.
“This has been in the works for a while so it didn’t catch me totally by surprise when it happened yesterday,” Bradford said.
When reports first surfaced that the Rams could trade Bradford, St. Louis coach Jeff Fisher said the reports were inaccurate. But Bradford revealed that he has known for nearly a month that the Eagles and coach Chip Kelly might trade for him.
Bradford said he’s happy to be in Philadelphia because he’s a fan of Kelly’s innovative offensive system.
“I think any quarterback in the league would love to play for Chip, in his offense,” Bradford said. “It’s extremely quarterback-friendly. The tape that I’ve watched, it just looks like a lot of fun to play in. I think it’s similar to what I did in college at Oklahoma. I’m extremely excited.”
Bradford also said he has “a great relationship” with Eagles offensive coordinator Pat Shurmur, who previously coached him in St. Louis. Bradford is happy — and not surprised — to be in Philadelphia.
znModeratorAnd i blame him for the destruction
of the offense as well as
the rainforest.Yeah? Well…Cignetti sucks.
znModeratorA lot of players are going to be free agents in 2016. Hayes, Sims, all the QBs, Barron, and the 2012 draft class.
Good point.
znModeratorI believe that you and Chip Kelly subscribe to the same philosophy.
Interestingly, I was against the Long signing when it happened.
But, he did turn out to be a pretty good play-action LOT.
Not a good classic style LOT. But once they dumped that woe-begotten spread that depended on green receivers and Richardson as the feature back, he did pretty well.
Then. Knee injuries.
March 11, 2015 at 4:09 pm in reply to: reporters on the trade (Wagoner, Thomas, Clayton, King, & many more) #20091
znModeratorBernie: Getting to know Nick Foles
By Bernie Miklasz
Here’s a scouting report on the Rams’ new quarterback acquired from Philadelphia on Tuesday in exchange for QB Sam Bradford…
1. Foles was born on Jan. 20, 1989 in Austin, Tex. and is a graduate of Westlake High School in Austin. Notable Westlake alums include New Orleans QB Drew Brees, Baltimore place kicker Justin Tucker, Tampa Bay tight end Kyle Adams, actress Angela Bettis, MLB reliever Huston Street, and retired MLB third baseman Kelly Gruber.
2. Foles, who is listed at 6-5 or 6-6 — depending on the source — was a star basketball player in high school. A three-year starter and two-time team MVP who was recruited by Texas, Baylor and Georgetown (among others.)
3. Foles’ parents, Larry and Melissa Foles, have done very well in the restaurant business. Larry Foles was co-founder of Eddie V’s Prime Seafood in Austin, a successful upscale establishment that now has 13 locations. Six are in Texas but other Eddie V’s can be found in Chicago, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif., Orlando, Tampa, Scottsdale AZ, and Northern Virginia. According to media reports Foles and partners sold the restaurants to a corporation that owns other chains including Red Lobster, Olive Garden and The Capital Grille. Reported sale price: $59 million.
4. Foles is married to Tori Moore, a former volleyball player at Arizona. (They met there as students.) She is the sister of former NFL tight end Evan Moore.
5. Foles is a devout Christian and a genuinely humble person. When asked how he handles the highs and lows of playing a demanding QB position Foles said: “I’m a Christian. It’s my faith in Christ. I’m into scripture every day. I have great players around me. And great parents that have raised me. And people that have surrounded me throughout my career who helped shape who I am. That’s who I go out there and play for every single day. I don’t play for myself. I play for my teammates and play for the people that helped me get to where I am. I know they’re watching me every week, and I want to play for them. It’s just in my heart and that’s who I am.
“I’m very fortunate to be playing, and I know that any given day could be the last. And I’ll be thankful for the time I have had to play this game. But I’m going to give my all every single day. So why would I let my confidence (fluctuations) and frustrations affect me when I know it’s only a short time where I can play this game. And it’s not worth getting all distraught and mad and going too high or too low. I just want to be me. That’s it. Simple as that.”
6. Foles isn’t a live-wire personality on or off the field. If you want a fist-pumping QB that shrieks at teammates and opponents, then this isn’t your guy. Fans that disliked Sam Bradford’s low-key personality will be getting the same in Foles. In Philadelphia, “Friday Night Lights” author Buzz Bissinger stirred things up by writing that Foles “has an aura of softness about him.” Bissinger recommended that Foles “man up to be the man.”
Here was Foles’ response at the time: “I don’t agree with it just because I think a quarterback and leader and anything it’s not necessarily what you do with the limelight or anything. Obviously, handling yourself in an appropriate matter is very important for you and your teammates, but I’ve always believed that you need to be who you are.
“If you’re a guy who loves to go out and be at everything and do that and you can be a great player and great leader as well, that’s awesome because that’s naturally what you’re great at, that’s naturally what you want to do. See, if I were to go and do all that stuff, that’s sort of out of my norm.
“I’ve always been a laid-back Texas boy. I love my family. I love being with my family. That’s what I stick to. I love the game of football. I love getting better. My teammates know me because I show them who I am in the locker room and then I don’t change when I go on the field.”
Foles had declined a one-on-one interview request with Bissinger before Bissinger wrote the piece.
7. According to the Eagles’ media guide, Foles lists “Where the Red Fern Grows” as his favorite book. Favorite film? The cartoon version of “Scooby-Doo.” In an interview with ESPN, Foles said his favorite Disney movie is “Lion King.” His favorite meal? Fried catfish. (He’ll be able to find plenty of that in the St. Louis area.) Foles also has, at least in the past, been a devotee of Bikram yoga.
8. Coming out of high school in 2007, Foles initially committed to Arizona State. But he had a change of heart and signed with Michigan State. After a season in East Lansing, Foles transferred to Arizona, got a chance to start during the 2009 season, and was the Wildcats’ full-time starter in 2010 and 2011. He was a communications major at Arizona.
9. Here’s a scouting report from the respected quarterback analyst Greg Cosell, who described Foles as a limited talent in a 2014 interview:
“I think if you look at Foles the player, what you likely see is this: He’s got a good arm but not a gun; he’s not a power thrower, not a drive thrower. He’s a little more of a finesse thrower than a drive thrower,” Cosell said “He does not have quick feet. There is no quick-twitch to his movement. There’s no explosive lower-body movement to him. When you look at Foles, I think what you see is a quarterback that needs the system to work for him and provide defined reads and good throws with the route concepts, just the whole system. He needs the system to work for him… I don’t think he’s really any different (from 2013.) Because he’s not a quick-twitch guy, when he doesn’t feel comfortable making a throw he’ll start to look a little awkward because he’s not quick twitch, he moves around.”
10. Foles is a workaholic. At Arizona, coaches had to tell him to ease off on lifting weights. He’s consumed by video scouting of opponents and has been known to have teammates over for film study.
11. Daniel Jeremiah, formerly a scout with the Eagles, had this to say (in part) in his official scouting report filed to the team before the 2012 draft: “Mentally, excellent smarts, knows what everybody is doing on the field, understands fronts and coverages. … outstanding worker, sets a tone in the weight room … great character … He’s all about football. Always at the facility. He was there when I was visiting with the (Arizona) QB coach. He wanted to see one particular play that bothered him from practice, so he showed up, came right into the room with his ice bag on his arm. Has the wide receivers over all the time to watch tape and eat at his apartment. Pays for their food … Foles is a clear leader of the team.”
12. Foles’ 2013 season was, in many respects, one of the finest by a QB in NFL history. Some highlights: Pro Bowl selection, Pro Bowl Offensive MVP, league passer-rating leader (119.2), two-time selection as NFC Offensive Player of the Week, had the 60th “perfect game” (as in passer rating) in NFL history, was ranked at No. 70 in the NFL Network’s list of Top 100 players in the league at the end of the 2013 season. Also: Foles tied an NFL record with seven TD passes in a game, had the best single season TD-interception ratio (27:2) in NFL history, and posted the best-ever passer rating (152.8) for a calendar month (Nov. 2013.)
13. Foles wasn’t nearly as effective in 2014, throwing 13 touchdowns and 11 interceptions with a passer rating of 81.4 before his season ended after eight games because of a broken collarbone. Cosell suggested that NFL defenses made some changes in how they played against Foles in 2014 after getting a chance to study the 2013 version of Foles and the Eagles offense.
“Because all of this was new to defensive coordinators, we all agree that it looked last year like there were a ton of open receivers, which doesn’t happen that much in the NFL,” Cosell said. “And he needs the system to work for him.”
14. Here’s an excerpt of Bissinger’s 2014 profile of Foles in Philadelphia magazine:
“The truth was, Nick Foles was something of a nerd (in high school), a guy who hung around with a small posse of mostly non-football nerds — eggheads, kids who would go on to careers in finance and private equity and engineering. A hot Saturday night was getting together at his house to play video games like Call of Duty, or hanging out at Zilker Park on the shores of Lady Bird Lake. ‘Dude, come on, you’re the quarterback, go out and have some fun,’ high-school teammate Matt Nader pleaded with him, fruitlessly.
“He was the kid you wanted dating your daughter, because he would have her home at 9:30 after you said 10. He was socially awkward, with a naive and goofy sense of humor. He dressed as if he had never seen clothes before. His hair was oddly styled in an ersatz pageboy, curling below his ears like a drainage ditch and covering his forehead in uneven wisps, thin grime on a windshield. His face was a cup of Napoleon Dynamite and a tablespoon of golly-gee-willikers and a teaspoon of Gomer Pyle.”
15. Eagles coach Chip Kelly had no problem trading Foles the quarterback. But Kelly was a big fan of Foles the person. “I wish there were more people like Nick Foles in our lives,” Kelly told the Philadelphia media last November.
znModeratorNone of that was anticipated. They just caught the Rams OL injury bug.
I still respectfully disagree. Guys that have been hurt, tend to get hurt again. Even if it isn’t the same part of the body.
People say that and never prove it. Did Brady get hurt again? Did Adrian Peterson? Did Kendricks get hurt again, after his surgery?
Wells had one routine scope. He wasn’t hurt in the way you mean that.
Long had arm surgeries—why would that mean he would rip up his knee. The issue was entirely whether he could still function at a high level after the arm injuries. No one said “he will get hurt again, in a different way” when he was signed.
I think the “guys get hurt again” thing is myth. Until someone gives me percentages, I just will always continue to think it is myth.
They CAN get both old and beat up and find it hard to come back. That would describe Wells NOW. Not when he signed.
Now there are guys like Saffold whose luck is so bad, if it’s not one damm thing it’s another. Over and over. But none of that described those 2 (Long and Wells) when they signed.
znModeratorIt’s not really THAT much. It’s a fair amount but not that much. You figure about 6 M for the draft picks, about 3-4 M for the season including the practice squad. That leaves say about 18-19 M, and they still haven’t resigned Britt or Barksdale. I don’t even think it counts Kendricks (which is just under 5 M a year).
March 11, 2015 at 3:34 pm in reply to: reporters on the trade (Wagoner, Thomas, Clayton, King, & many more) #20071
znModeratorCosell on the trade
znModeratorHe looks pretty good in the clutch to me. He only lost 2 games he started last year.
In the Eagles 1st loss against the 9ers with the eagles down 26-21, Foles led the offense to the 9ers 1 before he threw two incomplete passes after the 2 minute warning to bring an end to the comeback. Before the last 2 incomplete passes, he was 6/10 for 94 yards.
In the 2nd loss to the Cards, Foles led the Eagles to a fg that put the Eagles up 20-17 with less than 2 minutes in the game. The Cards responded with a quick 75 yard td pass. Foles then led the offense from the 20 to the Cards 16 in 1:30 or so & two timeouts before running out of time.
In the 2013 playoff game, Foles last possession was a td drive that put the Eagles up by 1 with 5 minutes left. Brees led the Saints to a game winning fg drive and the Eagles never saw the ball again.
See that’s the kind of stuff I like to hear about.
Grading this trade is kind of convoluted.
There are many possibilities.
Each coach could be wrong about 1 of the 2 qbs. Or both coaches could be wrong about both of them.
Or only 1 coach could be wrong, but it depends on which one he is wrong about.
Or both could be right, but for completely different reasons.
March 11, 2015 at 3:06 pm in reply to: Chip Kelly ( Was offered 1st rounder for Bradford this morning) #20065
znModeratorThis offseason proves that Bradford is valued by a number of NFL franchises, but not a lot of fans, nor a lot of pundits. If Bradford can avoid injuries, this trade would look like a steal for Philly.
It’s possible it could look like a steal.
In any event, I always thought fans were hard on Bradford, and that his worst critics looked at the wrong things (or to be more exact, didn’t look at the right things).
But the trade could also work for the Rams too. It’s nowhere near as one-sided as the RG3 trade.
March 11, 2015 at 3:03 pm in reply to: reporters on the trade (Wagoner, Thomas, Clayton, King, & many more) #20064
znModeratorPeter King
http://mmqb.si.com/2015/03/11/jameis-winston-roger-goodell-nfl-trades-free-agency-retirement/
The Rams-Eagles trade will take a long time to figure out. The deal no one saw coming was Sam Bradford and a fifth-round pick in 2015 for Nick Foles, a fourth-round pick in 2015 and a second-round pick in 2016. The Rams had multiple trade options for Bradford, who has had two straight seasons ended with ACL tears to his left knee, but by Monday they were focused on Philadelphia because the Eagles had something that no other involved team would offer—a potential starting quarterback in Foles.
“Chip came hard after Bradford,” an NFL insider said. “That’s why this happened.”
What I was told reliably Tuesday night: Philadelphia coach/power-czar Chip Kelly loves Bradford, feels Bradford’s the right guy to run his fast-paced offense, and this from an insider on the trade of the day: “Chip came hard after Bradford. That’s why this happened.” I know many of you think this is some sort of precursor to Kelly stockpiling weaponry to chase Marcus Mariota in the first round of the draft, but I don’t think so. There aren’t a lot of GMs in the league who would think Bradford is clearly better than Foles. So to trade up for Mariota, from where the Eagles sit at 20, would take first-round picks this year and next year, the second-round pick this year, Bradford, and probably more. That assumes the Titans or Jets actually want the risky Bradford and would sacrifice dealing down to number 20 this year in the process. I don’t see it. It’s far more likely that, as my source says, Kelly is smitten with Bradford, who ran a fast-paced offense at Oklahoma his final season even though he is more suited to a classic NFL scheme.
Two other points to be made here: I can tell you with certainty that this was not a trade made to punish Bradford for not re-doing his contract. Bradford was owed $13 million this year, and the Rams certainly wanted him to take a major pay cut to stay, after he gave them precious little in the past two seasons. I also can tell you that, even if Bradford had agreed to slash his salary before the weekend, the Rams still would have made this trade. They like this trade. They like Foles’ potential, they like the fact that they picked up a 2016 second-rounder, and through no fault of his own they’d lost faith in Bradford. No matter what they said, they just had no faith that Bradford could stay upright for 16 games.
As for Kelly, he now is under heavy, heavy pressure. No one truly buys that Bradford is a franchise quarterback. He may be, but he certainly isn’t now. He’s missed 39 of 80 possible NFL starts due to injury, he’s a 58.6 percent passer, and his passer rating is a feeble 79.3. He’s been hurt in fluky ways, but life for an NFL player starts with showing up, and Bradford hasn’t been good at that. If he either doesn’t play well or goes down by Columbus Day with another injury, it’s going to be very tough for Kelly to take the broadsides that will come his way in a tough NFL city.
znModerator“Foles isn’t a pressure quarterback.”
That limitation would be mitigated IF the Rams develop a solid OL and a really powerful running game.
I know why you say that…but the way I personally evaluate qbs, comeback ability and playing well in clutch situations is the single most important criterion (after the physical stuff like arm and release and so on).
And…I don’t know about Foles yet.
I am not throwing the entire season out. I just don’t know about Foles yet when it comes to clutch situations, and I really count performance in clutch situations higher than almost any other factor…with things like accuracy coming in after that.
…
znModeratorTo me calling Wells and Long bad signings is pure hindsight.
I’m gonna disagree with this. They were both coming off injuries (if memory serves correctly)
I love Kendricks though. I think he COULD be a great recieving threat, but he’s just too damn good in other areas and they have Cook. I actually hate Cook. I wish they’d have more plays for Kendricks, the dude can catch the football.
Long was coming off of ARM injuries and the question was whether he could still play at a high level after those surgeries. If people had concerns it was the arms. No one anticipated other injuries. No one saw 2 freak knee problems coming. In fact neither knee was from contact. They were just the dreaded hyperextensions.
Wells had a SCOPE which he called routine. A scope is not reconstructive knee surgery. He then got ill in Africa, and starting with that there were a series of bizarre injuries and accidents. But other than having a scope, Wells was an injury-free all-pro center and a good signing.
Long did not play well initially as a pass-blocking LOT, but once they switched to a play-action offense, he turned out to be a top run blocking tackle and a pretty good play-action pass-blocking tackle.
Until 2014, Wells played well when he was on the field. But the injuries kept mounting up, and they were bizarre. Last summer he got a rare infection from a tick bite and ended up hospitalized. He lost 40 pounds. He then had to sit out most of the summer to get back in playing shape, and when he finally did play, he then injured both his elbow and his back.
None of that was anticipated. They just caught the Rams OL injury bug.
znModeratorMarch 11, 2015 at 11:12 am in reply to: Grayson, Hundley, Petty, Carden etc. … the qbs this year #20010
znModeratorI think if they draft a QB he won’t be the worst QB on the roster. So, they probably will, maybe in the 4th round? But next year they will have a much better chance of finding their QB of the future and they now have an extra #2 for 2016.
They could do both.

Draft one this year and next year.
After all, they used the RG3 bonus to stock a pretty good roster…they can afford to draft 2 qbs.
Anyway word I heard was that they really liked Cook and he would have been the target if he had come out this year.
…
March 11, 2015 at 10:57 am in reply to: Grayson, Hundley, Petty, Carden etc. … the qbs this year #20004
znModeratorDo the Rams still draft a qb after they got both Foles and Keenum?
IMO…yes.
…
znModeratorJim Thomas @jthom1
Rams have shown some interest in former Atlanta offensive guard Justin Blalock.Examining Justin Blalock as a potential Rams fit
By Nick Wagoner
EARTH CITY, Mo. — As many of the big-ticket free-agent offensive linemen head to new locales with lucrative contracts in tow, the St. Louis Rams have mostly stood by and watched the market develop.
The Rams clearly have a need on the offensive line — multiple needs, in fact. But they were never likely to jump into the deep end of free agency and offer the piles of cash required to land guys like Orlando Franklin or Rodney Hudson. Franklin and Hudson appear headed for San Diego and Oakland, respectively, with contracts exceeding even the most optimistic of projections.
Meanwhile, the Rams have taken an approach similar to last year wherein they seem to be feeling out the market and looking to add players who might come in the wave after the initial burst. One such player who won’t move the needle much but might make sense for them is guard Justin Blalock.
The Atlanta Falcons released Blalock on Feb. 27 after he spent his first eight seasons there. Almost immediately, Blalock appeared to be a potential fit in St. Louis. At 31, Blalock doesn’t exactly fit the mold of the type of younger free agent that Rams general manager Les Snead and coach Jeff Fisher recently said they’d prefer but he would offer a possible short-term fix while the Rams bolster the group behind him with youth.
By now, you might be thinking that Blalock isn’t so much a replacement for the likely departing Davin Joseph, the player who started at right guard for most of the year last year for the Rams. In some sense, that’s a fair comparison given their respective ages. But in most areas, the two are completely different.
Blalock has been one of the most durable players in the league since the Falcons made him a second-round pick in 2007. In the time since, he’s started 125 games and only missed three along the way. Considering that he’s older and doesn’t profile to make the kind of money that a guy like Mike Iupati figures to command on the open market, Blalock could also probably be had for a relatively bargain rate.
In terms of scheme, Blalock would also make plenty of sense. He’s 6-foot-4, 326 pounds and is best suited for a power running scheme similar to what the Rams prefer. Part of the reason Atlanta allowed Blalock to leave other than saving money on the salary cap was that Blalock isn’t an ideal fit for the preferred zone schemes favored by new offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan.
Last but certainly not least, Blalock also has plenty of ties in St. Louis. He played for current Rams offensive line coach Paul Boudreau when he was in Atlanta from 2008 to 2011. Current Rams general manager Les Snead and some of his top lieutenants also spent time in Atlanta with Blalock.
One NFL personnel evaluator summed up Blalock at this stage of his career like this: “Blalock is steady, reliable player. This season was the first time in his career that he’s missed time. Good strength and is a better athlete than you think. Really smart player as well. Still has some years left in him.”
Since the Falcons released Blalock, he could sign with a team at any time. But since he’s not considered one of the top tier players available, there might not be much of a rush to do so. In theory, the Rams could explore other options while maintaining contact with Blalock in the meantime.
Whether anything comes of Rams’ potential interest remains to be seen but if it does, it wouldn’t come as much of a surprise.
znModeratorBradford/Foles Trade, Howard Balzer
Tuesday, March 10, 2015IMO Balzer is one of the best on all this.
Good listen.
-
AuthorPosts

