Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2015 at 5:37 pm in reply to: Was Nick Foles A Bad Fit For Philly? & other Foles speculations #27644
znModeratorRFL, I read somewhere that Foles would be a good fit for our offense because he is very good at selling play action and making accurate passes in short to medium routes.
I don’t think any article said that.
Actually we posters here have been saying that.
July 27, 2015 at 4:46 pm in reply to: knee injuries (an article on Bradford but stuff on Gurley could go here too) #27641
znModeratorHere’s a bunch of more stuff on ACL injuries and surgery:
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/will-todd-gurley-be-ready-to-go/
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/whats-the-deal-with-acls/
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/acl-recovery-time/
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/experts-say-re-injured-acls-are-common-pd/
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/what-is-the-timeframe-on-acl-recoveries/
————-
Are Bad Knees in Our Genes?
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/29/phys-ed-are-bad-knees-in-our-genes/?_r=0
Are fragile knees inherited? That intriguing question motivated a new study published earlier this month in The British Journal of Sports Medicine, during which researchers looked at one family’s propensity for shredding anterior cruciate ligaments during sports. The report was part of a much larger, ongoing study of risk factors for A.C.L. injury, led by researchers affiliated with the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Ohio State University, which involves thousands of young athletes. For this pocket version of the larger experiment, the scientists singled out a set of fraternal twin girls who already had been videotaped in the laboratory while wearing reflective markers. The angles of their knees during landing and cutting maneuvers had been analyzed, and the knees themselves measured. At the time of the taping, both girls’ knees were healthy. But within a year, each had suffered a catastrophic A.C.L. tear during separate volleyball and basketball games, as had an older sister, who wasn’t part of the original study.
Phys Ed“We thought this repeated incidence of A.C.L. tears within one family was important to look at,” said Timothy Hewett, the director of sports-medicine research for Ohio State University and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and lead author of the new study. “In my lab, we have another set of twins, identical young women, who are post-docs. They both had torn their A.C.L.’s” as high school athletes. “Their father, who is one of a set of triplets, also had torn his A.C.L.,” as had his two triplet brothers, Dr. Hewett said. “Those incidences,” together with the injuries to the fraternal twins, “made us wonder, How much does familial predisposition influence your risk for an A.C.L. tear?”
The answer may be quite a bit. What Dr. Hewett and his colleagues found when they parsed the data about the fraternal twin girls’ knees was that each had unusually loose, flexible knee joints, or “Gumby knees,” as Dr. Hewett called them. Each also angled at least one knee outward during landings and had narrower-than-average notches in the knee bone, where the A.C.L. attaches to the bone. Each of these conditions previously had been identified as a risk factor for an A.C.L. tear, but they hadn’t been shown to cluster within a family. “It appears that the propensity to be at high risk for an A.C.L. tear is definitely heritable,” Dr. Hewett said.
Anyone who has an active daughter or who follows the sports pages knows that the incidence of non-contact-related A.C.L. tears among young female athletes is high and increasing. Many strength- and balance-training programs have been developed to try to reduce the number of these A.C.L. injuries. But part of the problem with the
training programs, Dr. Hewett said, “is that they’ll only work if they reach the girls who actually are at risk,” because of how their knees are built. “Otherwise it’s like giving antibiotics to someone who doesn’t have an infection. It won’t work.”As a result, some of the most engrossing recent A.C.L. injury research has been aimed at finding at-risk knees, in part by probing the genetics of weak A.C.L.’s. In the past year, a flurry of new studies have identified several genes that seem to be closely associated with A.C.L. tears. One representative experiment, produced by scientists at the University of Cape Town in South Africa and published in June, sequenced gene segments from 129 volunteers who had torn an A.C.L., 38 of them women, and compared them with the same gene sequences in 216 active but uninjured people (a third of them were women too). They found that the women who had torn their A.C.L.’s were significantly more likely to share a specific variation in one of their genes. The gene is known to affect the suppleness of collagen or connective tissue in tendons and ligaments like the A.C.L. Most of the men in both groups and the uninjured women didn’t have that genetic variant. Similarly, in another experiment by the same group of scientists, published in November, a separate gene variant was found to be more common in women who had ruptured their A.C.L.’s. That gene variant also affects the makeup of the collagen in tendons. No one knows yet whether women who carry both variants of the genes might be at especially high risk of an A.C.L. rupture.
But the emerging genetics of A.C.L. injury do raise the possibility that “in the not-so-distant future we might be able to screen” the DNA of young athletes and find those at highest injury risk, Dr. Hewett said. Obviously, he added, much work remains to be done in the field. The genetic variants so far associated with A.C.L. injury risk have been found primarily in injured women. But men injure their A.C.L.’s, in higher raw numbers than women, since so many more men participate in sports that threaten knees (soccer, basketball and skiing, for instance). Are there genetic risk factors for men? Should all young athletes be screened, if and when a viable screening test becomes available? And given that no A.C.L. injury prevention program has yet proved wholly successful, what advice do you give a young woman athlete whose genetic test shows that her knee is extremely vulnerable?
“There’s so much we still have to learn and think about,” Dr. Hewett said.
For now, the takeaway from the current research is simple. Look to your family. “If you have a first-generation relative, a sibling or parent, who has torn an A.C.L., you are likely to be at above-average risk,” Dr. Hewett said, and might want to investigate the availability of A.C.L. injury prevention programs in your area. You also can find self-guided programs online at a number of Web sites and on YouTube. Genetics will, of course, never provide “all of the answers to the question of why” some people tear an A.C.L. and others in the same situation do not, Dr. Hewett said. “But this field does give us another piece of the puzzle.”
July 27, 2015 at 11:48 am in reply to: Was Nick Foles A Bad Fit For Philly? & other Foles speculations #27628
znModeratorThe chatty Cathy’s talking crap about Foles long after the trade while raising a shit storm at the time of the trade. Pathetic.
Okay. But IMO this is all just “prior to camp, where do teams stand at qb” stuff. We’re just not posting it for all 32 teams. No one is complaining about the trade or saying it was a bad one. We always knew there were questions about 2014. There’s a mix of different answers to that I think.
My comment was directed at the comments questioning Foles ability to do the work, to accept being coached, handling criticism and so on. The reaction at the time of the trade Philly was that they didn’t want to trade Foles. Now when he’s been out of town they want to tear him down? To what? Build up Bradford? Kelly? It’s pathetic.
No one said he couldn’t or didn’t do the work. They did say he didn’t take well to tough coaching, but that apparently has to do more with one coach (the qb coach). I have no reason to doubt that, and I also don’t think it’s a big deal—I gather the issue was that one qb coach, not coachING in general. Sounds like a style clash with one qb coach. We do know that Kelly soured on Foles during the season…that was reported during the season. Foles was never Kelly’s guy IMO. In fact the Eagles fan I posted in this thread who doesn’t like Kelly makes that clear.
My take on all of this is that Foles wasn’t as good a fit in Phil as he will be in St. Louis.
I have no stakes in the Kelly game. If people don’t like him, that’s fine with me.
.
July 27, 2015 at 10:30 am in reply to: Was Nick Foles A Bad Fit For Philly? & other Foles speculations #27626
znModeratorThe chatty Cathy’s talking crap about Foles long after the trade while raising a shit storm at the time of the trade. Pathetic.
Okay. But IMO this is all just “prior to camp, where do teams stand at qb” stuff. We’re just not posting it for all 32 teams. No one is complaining about the trade or saying it was a bad one. We always knew there were questions about 2014. There’s a mix of different answers to that I think.
July 27, 2015 at 1:21 am in reply to: Was Nick Foles A Bad Fit For Philly? & other Foles speculations #27622
znModeratorthis reporting is pathetic.
What did you find pathetic? Just curious. I don’t have any stake in any of these pieces in this thread, just posting them…I just wonder what’s on your mind.
July 27, 2015 at 12:14 am in reply to: knee injuries (an article on Bradford but stuff on Gurley could go here too) #27620
znModeratorHere’s a bunch of more stuff on ACL injuries and surgery:
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/will-todd-gurley-be-ready-to-go/
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/whats-the-deal-with-acls/
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/acl-recovery-time/
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/experts-say-re-injured-acls-are-common-pd/
http://theramshuddle.com/topic/what-is-the-timeframe-on-acl-recoveries/
znModeratorRams mailbag: Identifying camp’s biggest position battles
Nick Wagoner
EARTH CITY, Mo. — Well, we are almost there. The St. Louis Rams are set to open training camp on Friday with rookies reporting Monday and the veterans jumping in on Wednesday.
But before we get there, we’ve got time for another edition of the Rams Twitter mailbag.
As always, you can find me on Twitter @nwagoner. Please use hashtag #RamsMail so I can see your questions. On to business.
SeattleRams @seattlerams
Headed into camp, which position battles look to be the most contested over the summer? Center? OLB? 3rd RB?@nwagoner: Center is certainly the one that takes the prize here. I legitimately wouldn’t be surprised by any outcome in that battle between Barrett Jones, Tim Barnes and Demetrius Rhaney. For perspective, last week I projected Barnes as the starter heading into camp (though it’s really a dead heat) but also believe that he could be cut when they get to 53. The Rams are going to rotate all three players with the first-team offense and I believe they’d like Jones to win the job and Rhaney offers more upside. At this point, Barnes has some starting experience but that might not be enough to save his job after we go through camp and the preseason. And for what it’s worth, had the Rams not drafted tackle Isaiah Battle, I could’ve seen a scenario in which all three centers made the cut to 53. Maybe injuries will factor in and change things again, but attempting to project who starts at center on Sept. 13 right now is a really difficult exercise.
John Palmieri @JPalmieri30
Are the Rams currently trying to get an extension done with Janoris Jenkins? I think he is a must keep player.@nwagoner: Currently? I don’t know if that’s in the works at the moment but I do know the Rams have had some preliminary discussions with some players they’d like to keep around. Remember, they have a lot of unrestricted free agents after the season, so it stands to reason that if they have decided fully that they want to keep some of them, getting them done sooner than later would be a good thing. I believe they have interest in keeping Janoris Jenkins and wouldn’t be surprised if he was in the mix for a deal. I’ll be sure to check in on this further as we get into camp.
derrick costoplos @costoplos
I really thought Mason was the future,but it’s looking like a Lendale White/CJ combo thing now with Gurley.true?
@nwagoner: I don’t think it plays out that way. Tre Mason will get his opportunities, and certainly more than his share, until Todd Gurley is healthy. But when Gurley is at full speed, he’s going to be the primary guy. The Rams view him as their Adrian Peterson or Marshawn Lynch. Jeff Fisher even acknowledged he could be his new Eddie George. In other words, the Rams didn’t draft him to be part of an elaborate timeshare. He’ll be the focal point of the offense sooner than later.Cody Zick @zick823
Do you think Andrew Donnal or Jamon Brown will win a starting spot on the O-line?@nwagoner: Well, Jamon Brown was already working with the first team at right guard in the spring and the Rams seem pleased with his progress. I suppose things could change, but he seems to be in a really good spot when it comes to winning that job. Andrew Donnal is probably going to settle into a backup spot.
Gerald S. Reynolds @ranchghost_g
How can the team seriously compete with that offensive line?@nwagoner: Well, I suppose one could argue that simply making some changes will make the line better than it was last season. Despite their line woes a year ago, the Rams were competitive. But I also am assuming you mean can they contend rather than compete? We know the Rams will compete and be in the majority of their games. To me, the offensive line is the single biggest question of any position group on the team. That’s not breaking any new ground, but it’s certainly the case. How do two rookies fare? Who starts at center? Can Greg Robinson elevate his game? Can Rodger Saffold stay healthy? That’s a lot of questions to answer. I fully expect there to be plenty of growing pains for that group, but if it can prove capable of at least getting the job done in the run game and not be a total sieve pass blocking, the Rams will have a fighting chance. Still, it’s probably going to be a constant work in progress for most of the season, and it’s fair to wonder if it will be good enough for the Rams to actually contend for a playoff spot.
July 26, 2015 at 11:20 pm in reply to: the Seattle approach–what is the relative value of a great 2ndary v. a great DL #27617
znModeratorCherry pick comeback wins if you like but that doesn’t change what I’ve watched over the last two years. Seattle defense without Wilson at QB doesn’t win the NFC.
But I think there are more than a dozen qbs who would have the same results in Phil. Maybe even better. By way of comparison, Warner has fewer crucial comeback wins in his career because he sometimes had defenses that could not keep the other team from counter-scoring. Wilson does have that.
July 26, 2015 at 10:04 pm in reply to: Was Nick Foles A Bad Fit For Philly? & other Foles speculations #27612
znModeratorNick Foles couldn’t handle pressure from Eagles’ fans; can Sam Bradford?
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/07/nick_foles_couldnt_handle_pressure_from_eagles_fan_1.html
It’s no secret that the Eagles are looking for a franchise quarterback.
At times, Nick Foles looked to be that guy, as he led the Eagles to the 2013 NFC East championship, and went 15-10 in two seasons with head coach Chip Kelly.
Off the field, however, it appears that Foles might not have been ready for the spotlight of Philadelphia — and that could be why he is in St. Louis.
Speaking on 97.5 the Fanatic (via Birds 24/7) Philadelphia Inquirer’s Jeff McLane had this to say about Foles, and his ability to handle the pressure of being “the guy” in Philadelphia.
“Nick, I think, wasn’t very comfortable in that role [of a franchise quarterback], especially in Philadelphia,” he said. “I think there probably wasn’t as much written about that [as there should’ve been] and I’ve kind of learned a few things since Nick has been gone, that it had really gotten to him, some of the criticism that was happening here in Philadelphia based on his play last season and I don’t think Bradford is the type of guy where he lets that type of stuff get to him.”
McLane isn’t the only one to recently point out Foles’ off-the-field problems with the spotlight.
Here is what Louis Riddick, a former member of the Eagles’ front office, had to say about Foles in an interview on 97.5 The Fanatic:
“My experience with Nick is that he was very even-keel, very mellow, very much so not affected by a lot of outside things, but more…I’ve talked with people directly that were with him every day and coached him, and he was the kind of guy who behind the scenes didn’t necessarily like being criticized, didn’t necessarily like maybe being coached hard, being gotten on in the way that some quarterbacks and some players can take. So is it surprising that maybe he would fit in a little bit better in a town like St. Louis where, not necessarily that they don’t have high expectations, but it’s not the same kind of scrutiny he’ll face here in Philadelphia? Yeah, that doesn’t shock me. That doesn’t shock me that he would feel more comfortable there.”
Whether Foles truly was able to handle the spotlight is, at this point, almost irrelevant.
The question is, can Bradford?
As Bradford will find out, the pressure to preform in Philadelphia will be far more intense than it was in St. Louis. Even as the former No. 1 overall pick, Bradford will face more pressure than he ever has in his career this season.
If he doesn’t live up to the expectations of Eagles’ fans, Bradford will certainly hear it.
And if he can’t handle it, he could find himself in a similar situation to Foles this time next year — out of Philadelphia.
—–
Eagles players said Nick Foles let criticism negatively impact him
Nick Foles is a tough quarterback. His gritty performance against the Washington Redskins in Week 3 last season is a reminder of this fact. But maybe his mental toughness doesn’t match his physical toughness.
At least, that’s what Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer seemed to suggest during a radio appearance with Anthony Gargano and Jon Marks on 97.5 The Fanatic on Wednesday morning. Transcription via Crossing Broad, bold emphasis is mine:
“Nick wasn’t really comfortable in that [franchise QB] role. And I think there wasn’t much written about that and we’ve learned more about that since Nick has been gone … It really got to him, some of the criticism here in Philadelphia about his play last year. I heard from a couple of players that he’d get down … I understood that he’d let it get to him. I think that had to do with the decision to part with him … they felt like Nick wasn’t the guy for this team and this city.”
Interesting. I hardly think Foles being negatively impacted by criticism was the deciding factor why the Eagles moved on from him, but it could have contributed to the decision. The main reason Foles is gone, I’d argue, is because Chip Kelly felt he was a limited talent and Sam Bradford offers a bigger upside.
The concept of an athlete “not being able to handle Philadelphia because it’s tough” definitely isn’t new. There are plenty examples of this in the past. I remember people saying similar things about Flyers goalie Ilya Bryzgalov after he was ran out of town. There are other examples that don’t immediately come to mind. Personally, I don’t put a lot of stock into it. I think the real issue is a lack of talent more than anything.
znModeratorSam Bradford Injury: Updates on Eagles QB’s Recovery from Torn ACL
Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Sam Bradford hasn’t played in a regular-season NFL game since October 2013, but the former No. 1 overall pick is seemingly on pace to end that lengthy drought.
The Eagles took a chance on Bradford when they acquired him in a trade with the St. Louis Rams, as he tore his ACL for the second consecutive year last preseason, but the team is confident in his recovery and status for training camp.
While the 27-year-old signal-caller wasn’t able to partake fully in organized team activities, Eliot Shorr-Parks of NJ.com is hearing from a source that he will indeed be ready to go full-bore in 11-on-11 drills when training camp opens Aug. 2.
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/07/sam_bradford_should_be_ready_for_eagles_training_c.html
According to a person familiar with the situation who requested anonymity, Bradford is “looking great”, has been in the rehab room close to every day this summer, and should be ready to go when training camp opens.
That means Bradford should be out on the field for 11-on-11 drills for the start of training cam
This report comes on the heels of Bradford expressing confidence that he would be far enough along in his recovery to assume his spot as the starting quarterback during training camp, per Shorr-Parks.
“If I’m not ready for 11-on-11 by training camp, then something has gone horribly wrong,” Bradford said. “That’s the plan right now. We’re going to keep plugging away and be ready when camp starts.”
Tim McManus of PhillyMag.com reported the Eagles’ investigation while providing a reassuring statement from Eagles head coach Chip Kelly:
We looked at everything, and we knew we weren’t going to pick No. 1 or No. 2. So, and I’ve said it before, if you’re not going to pick one or two, how do you go get a quarterback?” said Kelly, explaining the thought process heading into this offseason. “Peyton Manning switched teams because of an injury. Drew Brees switched teams because of an injury. So we went down that path.”
When it came to Bradford, the Eagles doctors consulted with the St. Louis trainers and the those that performed the surgery. The word they received was that the 27-year-old, coming off the second tear of his left ACL in less than a year’s time, “was fine” and “was progressing.” Further, there was no cartilage issues in the knee. On both occasions, it was just the ACL that was damaged.
The Eagles did their own independent research as well and reached the conclusion that when it comes to ACLs, there is a 10-to-12 percent chance of re-injury.
Back in May we spoke with Dr. James L. Carey, Director of the Penn Center for Advanced Cartilage Repair and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He cited studies that show the probability of re-tearing a reconstructed ACL is about three to six percent. (Those studies were on the general population, not just football players.)
Meanwhile, the chances of tearing the other knee — or the “native ACL” — is higher, around nine to 12 percent — closer to the figures that Kelly used.
Sponsored ContentEither way, the stats show that there is a pretty good chance that history won’t repeat. The idea was to take a shot on a QB with upside who probably wouldn’t be available if not for the injury history, and hope he ascends to the level of the elite. The Brees example is one that Kelly referred to on multiple occasions, like when he was asked about the possibility of Bradford being skittish in the pocket given what he’s gone through over the past two seasons.
Bradford’s impending return is huge for the Eagles since it means the likes of Mark Sanchez, Matt Barkley and Tim Tebow won’t have to take starting reps, but it’s even bigger for Bradford’s future.
According to NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport, the former University of Oklahoma standout has opted against signing an extension with the Eagles prior to the season:
Ian Rapoport@RapSheetFor Sam Bradford, not signing an extension now may allow him to maximize his value. He takes that over more security long-term
He is essentially gambling on himself, and the notion that he’ll be ready for training camp means the first roll of the dice is about to go his way.
Bradford will also have to prove that he can go through the preseason, regular season and perhaps even the playoffs without suffering another catastrophic injury, which is something he has been unable to avoid over the past two years.
If he can stay healthy and integrate himself into an offense anchored by running back DeMarco Murray, though, he stands to land a nice payday when the 2015 campaign reaches its conclusion.
July 26, 2015 at 7:21 pm in reply to: the Seattle approach–what is the relative value of a great 2ndary v. a great DL #27608
znModeratorSeahawks have Wilson at QB and Lynch at RB to extend drives. Their defense is incapable of winning without a well functioning offense.
Fwiw we just differ on that. To me, it’s that Wilson has Lynch and that defense.
Wilson keeps those drives alive more so than Lynch. That defense without Wilson leading the offense does not win the NFC.
Well in terms of third down conversions passing, Wilson/Seattle is actually 26th in the league, so I don’t know about that. (That’s conversion percentages.)
In terms of third down conversions rushing, Wilson is 31st in the league (again, percentages).
In terms of his comebacks, if you look at them, most of the time Seattle’s score leaves time on the clock for the other team to take the win back, but the D holds.
Just looking at 2014…blue = Wilson is a major factor, red = defense is the major factor in preserving a win.
Against Denver, it was overtime. Denver ties it in the 4th, and Seattle got the ball first in overtime. Lynch scores.
Good short passing game helps get them down the field.Against Carolina, close game and Carolina had the ball last with 0.42 to go. But this one is on Wilson.
]Against the Giants, it was tied at the end of the 3rd. In the 4th, the first Seattle score in the 4th leading to a blowout comes after an INT. Michael/Turbin/Lynch dominate running on the go-ahead drive, Wilson is 0 for 1 on the drive but has one run for 11. End result, Seattle 38-17.Seattle scores three times and the Giants can do nothing.
Against St. Louis, same thing. Tied at the end of the third. Seattle scores twice, Rams do nothing against that defense. In the go-ahead drive at the top of the 4th, Wilson sets up a score hitting Norwood for 31. Cunningham fumbles one drive, Rams INT for 6 on another, Rams turn it over on downs on another.
Green Bay. Playoffs. Green Bay ties it, after several aborted efforts. Seattle gets the ball first in overtime. Wilson throws the 35 yarder to Kearse.
That’s just 2014. It’s clear from that Wilson contributes a lot to a team that is built to dominate in the 4th, but in 3 of the games the defense aggressively defends those leads, which are not late 4th quarter type comeback wins.
July 26, 2015 at 5:45 pm in reply to: the Seattle approach–what is the relative value of a great 2ndary v. a great DL #27605
znModeratorSeahawks have Wilson at QB and Lynch at RB to extend drives. Their defense is incapable of winning without a well functioning offense.
Fwiw we just differ on that. To me, it’s that Wilson has Lynch and that defense.
July 26, 2015 at 2:18 pm in reply to: Was Nick Foles A Bad Fit For Philly? & other Foles speculations #27601
znModeratorfrom off the net
==
NotaKellyfan (Eagles fan)
All I am attempting to do is add context for those of you that did not see Foles play.
Chip Kelly never wanted Foles as his QB. He made a big deal of talking about how he didn’t need particular types of players, but he went out of his way to show otherwise. He gave the job to Vick, who struggled. Kelly never put him in front of Vick. Kelly chose Vick and only put Foles in when Vick inevitably got hurt. Foles came in the second half of the Giants game in 2013 and led the team to its second victory. Foles then lit up the BUCs scoring 4 TDs (one rushing) and Chip wouldn’t commit. Foles then got concussed and had a horrid game against the Cowboys. Vick came back and got hurt again against the Giants, giving Kelly no choice but to play him. Foles then threw 7 TDS and made it impossible to bench him.
My point being, I don’t believe Kelly ever wanted Foles as his guy and he was pretty much forced into it. It is true that Foles started over Sanchez, but I don’t think Foles left him much of a choice.
Last year, Foles struggled but it was not solely his fault. Foles was playing behind a makeshift line for much of his time. Lane Johnson was suspended for the first four games. So the Eagles swung Todd Herremans out of his RG spot to RT. Evan Mathis, the LG, went down with an injury in week one. Jason Kelce, the starting Center, went down with an injury in week 3. The week 4 starting line, the week the Eagles played the 49ers, was Jason Peters at LT, Matt Tobin at LG, David Molk at C, Dennis Kelly at RG and Todd Herremans at RT. Like Foles, Herremans got hurt against the Texans. Kelce came back the week prior and Mathis came back for Sanchez’s first start. Sanchez had the benefit of 4/5ths of the line for his entire tenure.
I truly believe he was more injured than they revealed in the Washington game. I think that may have also led to Foles’ having some mistrust in the OL.
Lesean McCoy struggled mightily at certain points giving less than 20 rushing yards in two different games. Teams were rushing four guys and dropping into coverage because they were facing three, or in some cases, four backup linemen and able to get pressure.
Another difference between 2014 and 2013 was the change in QB coach. The new coach emphasized getting the ball out quickly and not taking sacks, Foles had taken 28 sacks in 10.5 games in 2013. Foles actually did very well avoiding sacks after the first half of the first game, he had taken five sacks and turned it over three times in that half. He took only 4 sacks in the next 6.75 games, but had 10 turnovers in that span.
Also, Foles’ 2014 numbers look worse thanks in large part to a game and a half of bad football against the 49ers, a week after being injured against Washington, and the first half against the Jaguars. Foles’ was 32/64 for 331 yards, 3 INTs, 2 fumbles, 6 sacks and a 45.8 QB rating in that stretch. In Foles other games he took only three sacks despite heavy pressure and was 154/247 for 1,832 yards, 13 TDs, 7 INTs, 1 fumble and 90.7 QB Rating. The team was also averaging 33 points per game with him in those games.
Of course it would be illogical to pretend those six quarters never happened as they did, but it should come as some comfort that he wasn’t mediocre all year. He simply had a bad stretch which made his season mediocre.
His deep accuracy was a struggle last year, but that was partially because of a lack of chemistry with his WRs. Maclin was hurt for much of training camp and Kelly had Matthews working with the backups instead of Foles. Meanwhile Riley Cooper’s play dropped off a cliff and the line issues factored in as well. That said, I don’t think many questioned his accuracy either.
His decision making was questionable last season, but again I think the offensive line should be considered. The injury probably factored in a little bit too.
I am not trying to excuse all of Foles’ problems last year. He did have struggles. Several of his interceptions left me surprised and the fumble against the Rams had me highly irritated. Foles did fall into a phantom pressure mode after the first month or so. He would fade backwards to avoid pressure and end up rushing a throw, which IMO came from the new QB coach attempting to force quicker decisions. I have said before I believe the phantom pressure may have had something to do with the late hit against the Redskins where I believe he was actually hurt.
Foles’ release is slower than Bradford’s. That was a definite question mark. It’s also fair game to question his deep accuracy though I would again point to the circumstances.
But all told, The Eagles were in every game with Foles even the 49ers game where he did not play well in the least. He kept the team within reach and threw what could have been a gamewinning TD if Riley Cooper had hung onto the ball. Against the Cardinals Foles threw a last second pass into the endzone which would have won the game, but Jordan Matthews could not stay in bounds.
I think he is legitimately capable of being a top ten QB and he should improve your team. I was honestly expecting Andy Reid to make another attempt at trading for him.
znModerator
This undated photo provided by the New England Aquarium shows the carcass of rarely-seen deep water beaked whale that washed ashore on Jones Beach in Plymouth, Mass. Aquarium biologists and staff from the International Fund for Animal Welfare are performing a necrospy at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on the carcass after it was found Friday, July 24, 2015. (New England Aquarium via AP)
Beaked whale
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaBeaked whales are the members of the family Ziphiidae which consists of 22 species. These toothed whales are notable for their elongated beaks. Among air-breathing animals, beaked whales are some of the most extreme divers: Cuvier’s beaked whales regularly dive for an hour at a depth over 1,000 m (3,300 ft),[1] and the longest and deepest foraging dive recorded is 137.5 minutes and 2,992 m (9,816 ft). This is the greatest dive-depth known for a mammal.[2]
Beaked whales are one of the least known groups of mammals because of their deep-sea habitat, mysterious habits, and apparent low abundance.[3] Only three to four of the 22 species are reasonably well-known. Baird’s and Cuvier’s beaked whales were subject to commercial exploitation, off the coast of Japan, while the northern bottlenose whale was extensively hunted in the northern part of the North Atlantic late in the 19th and early in the 20th centuries.
Diving
Beaked whales are deep divers with extreme dive profiles.[1] They regularly dive deeper than 500 m (1,600 ft) to echolocate for food, and these deep dives are often followed by multiple shallower dives of less than 500 m.[11] This pattern is not always followed however. Animals have been observed spending more than an hour at or near the surface breathing. Beaked whales are often seen surfacing synchronously, but asynchronous surfacing has also been observed.[12]
Deep-diving mammals face a number of challenges related to extended breath holding and hydrostatic pressure. Cetaceans and pinnipeds that prolong apnea must optimize the size and use of their oxygen stores, and they must deal with the accumulation of lactic acid due to anaerobic metabolism.[1] Beaked whales have several anatomical adaptations to deep diving: large spleens, livers, and body shape. Most cetaceans have small spleens. However, beaked whales have much larger spleens than delphinids, and may have larger livers as well. These anatomical traits, which are important for filtering blood, could be adaptations to deep diving. Another notable anatomical adaptation among beaked whales is a slight depression in the body wall that allows them to hold their pectoral flippers tightly against their bodies for increased streamlining.[5]
The challenges of deep diving are also overcome by the unique diving physiology of beaked whales. Oxygen storage during dives is mostly achieved by blood hemoglobin and muscle myoglobin.[11] While the whale is diving, its heart rate slows and blood flow changes. This physiological dive response ensures oxygen-sensitive tissues maintain a supply of oxygen, while those tissues tolerant to hypoxia receive less blood flow. Additionally, lung collapse obviates the exchange of lung gas with blood, likely minimizing the uptake of nitrogen by tissues.[5]
Feeding
The throats of all beaked whales have a bilaterally paired set of grooves that are associated with their unique feeding mechanism, suction feeding.[5] Instead of capturing prey with their teeth, beaked whales suck it into their oral cavity. Suction is aided by the throat grooves, which stretch and expand to accommodate food. Their tongue can move very freely. By suddenly retracting the tongue and distending the gular (throat) floor, pressure immediately drops within the mouth sucking the prey in with the water.
Dietary information is available from stomach contents analyses of stranded beaked whales and from whaling operations. Their preferred diet is primarily deep-water squid,[7] but also benthic and benthopelagic fish and some crustaceans, mostly taken near the sea floor.[12] In a recent study, gouge marks in the seafloor were interpreted to be a result of feeding activities by beaked whales.[13]
To understand the hunting and foraging behavior of beaked whales, researchers used sound and orientation recording devices (DTAGs) on two species: Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris) and Blainville’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris). These whales hunt by echolocation in deep water (where the majority of their prey is located) between approximately 200–1,885 m (656–6,184 ft) and usually catch about 30 prey per dive. Cuvier’s beaked whale must forage on average at 1,070 m (3,510 ft) for 58 minutes and Blainville’s beaked whales typically forage at 835 m (2,740 ft) deep for an average of 47 minutes.[1]
Range and habitat
The family Ziphiidae is one of the most widespread families of cetaceans, ranging from the ice edges at both the north and south poles, to the equator in all the oceans.[14] Specific ranges vary greatly by species, though beaked whales typically inhabit offshore waters that are at least 300 meters deep.
Beaked whales are known to congregate in deep waters off the edge of continental shelves, and bottom features, such as seamounts, canyons, escarpments, and oceanic islands, including the Azores and the Canary Islands.[12]
Life history
Very little is known about the life histories of beaked whales. The oldest one ever recorded was 84 years for a male Baird’s beaked whale, and the oldest recorded female Baird’s beaked whale is 54 years. For all other beaked whale species studied, the highest recorded age is between 27 and 39 years. Sexual maturity is reached between seven and 15 years of age in Baird’s beaked whales and northern bottlenose whales. Gestation varies greatly between species, lasting 17 months for Baird’s beaked whales and 12 months for the northern bottlenose whale.[15] There are currently no data available on their reproductive rates.
It is difficult to determine group size of beaked whales, due to their inconspicuous surfacing behavior. Groups of beaked whales, defined as all individuals found in the same location at the same time, have been reported as ranging from one to 100 individuals. Nevertheless, some populations’ group size has been estimated from repeated observations. For example, northern and southern bottlenose whales (H. ampullatus and H. planifrons), Cuvier’s beaked whales and Blainville’s beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) have a reported maximum group size of 20 individuals, with the average ranging from 2.5 to 3.5 individuals. Berardius species and Longman’s beaked whales (Indopacetus pacificus) are found in larger groups of up to 100 individuals.[12]
Not much information is available about group composition of beaked whales. Only three species have been studied in any detail: northern bottlenose whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, and Baird’s beaked whales. Female northern bottlenose whales appear to form a loose network of social partners with no obvious long-term associations. In contrast to females, some male northern bottlenose whales have been repeatedly recorded together over several years, and possibly form long-term associations. Studies of Blainville’s beaked whales have revealed groups usually consist of a number of females, calves and/or juvenile animals. These whales are assumed to live in “harem-like” groups, where several females and young are accompanied by a single male.[7] Baird’s beaked whales are known to occur in multiple male groups, and in large groups consisting of adult animals of both sexes.
ConservationFor many years, most beaked whale species were insulated from anthropogenic impacts because of their remote habitat. However, there are now several issues of concern:
Studies of stranded beaked whales show rising levels of toxic chemicals in their blubber.[16]
As a top predator, beaked whales, like raptors, are particularly vulnerable to build-up of biocontaminants. They frequently ingest plastic bags (which do not break down and can be lethal).[12]
They more frequently become trapped in trawl nets, due to the expansion of deepwater fisheries.[17]Decompression sickness
A major conservation concern for beaked whales (family Ziphiidae) is they appear to be vulnerable to modern sonar operations, which arises from recent strandings that temporally and physically coincide with naval sonar exercises.[18] Postmortem examinations of the stranded whales in concurrence with naval exercises have reported the presence of hemorrhaging near the ears or gas and fat emboli, which could have a deleterious impact on beaked whales that is analogous to decompression sickness in humans.[11] Gas and fat emboli have been shown to cause nervous and cardiovascular system dysfunction, respiratory distress, pain, and disorientation in both humans and animals.[18] In the inner ear, gas embolism can cause hemorrhages, leading to disorientation or vestibular dysfunction.
Breath-holding divers, like beaked whales, can develop decompression-related problems (the “bends”) when they return to the surface after deep dives.[1] This is a possible hypothesis for the mass strandings of pelagic beaked whales associated with sonar-related activities. To illustrate, a diving beaked whale may be surfacing from a deep dive and must pass vertically through varying received sound levels. Since the whale has limited remaining oxygen supplies at the end of a long dive, it probably has limited abilities to display any normal sound avoidance behavior. Instead, the whale must continue to swim towards the surface to replenish its oxygen stores.[12] Avoiding sonar inevitably requires a change in behavior or surfacing pattern. Therefore, sonar in close proximity to groups of beaked whales has the potential to cause hemorrhaging or to disorient the animal, eventually leading to a stranding.
Current research reveals two species of beaked whales are most affected by sonar: Cuvier’s beaked whales (Z. cavirostris) and Blainville’s (M. densirostris) beaked whales. These animals have been reported as stranding in correlation with military exercises in Greece, the Bahamas, Madeira, and the Canary Islands.[19] The livers of these animals had the most damage.[20]
Though some evidence indicates sonar-related activities can actually lead to a form of decompression sickness in beaked whales, the topic is still up for debate. A significant limiting factor in determining the likelihood of bubble formation in whale tissues and the risk of decompression sickness is the lack of information on their normal diving and surfacing patterns.[1] More research is necessary to determine the extent of whale tissue damage caused by sonar exercises.
Four species are classified by the IUCN as “lower risk, conservation dependent”: Arnoux’s and Baird’s beaked whales, and the northern and southern bottlenose whales. The status of the remaining species is unknown, preventing classification.[21]
znModerator
This undated photo provided by the New England Aquarium shows the carcass of rarely-seen deep water beaked whale that washed ashore on Jones Beach in Plymouth, Mass. Aquarium biologists and staff from the International Fund for Animal Welfare are performing a necrospy at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on the carcass after it was found Friday, July 24, 2015. (New England Aquarium via AP)
July 26, 2015 at 9:48 am in reply to: Was Nick Foles A Bad Fit For Philly? & other Foles speculations #27586
znModeratorBernie: Foles could be the answer for Rams — or not
By Bernie Miklasz
Here’s one of the worst things about the constant huffing and puffing over the Rams, St. Louis, Stan Kroenke, Los Angeles, Gov. Nixon, the Edward Jones Dome, the STL stadium task force, NFL relocation guidelines, the proposed stadium on the north riverfront, Peacock & Blitz, Roger Goodell, the San Diego Chargers, the Oakland Raiders, Carson, and Inglewood (always up to no good) …
I don’t talk about Rams football anymore.
You know: the game on the field.
Not the game of Monopoly.
I’ve been so hopelessly distracted by STL vs. LA and the Battle for Los Angeles, I’ve struggled to keep up with the football stuff.
So let’s talk about the Rams’ 2015 training camp, shall we?
Hey, I know you’ve heard me say this before, but I’m confident this is the year that quarterback Sam Bradford finally puts it all together for the Rams.
The Rams just needed to surround Bradford with more talent. And the free-agent signing of left offensive tackle Jake Long should keep Bradford upright and healthy.
Plus, this will be Bradford’s fourth season working with offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer, and the continuity will make a positive difference.
Know what I mean?
What’s that?
Bradford was traded to Philadelphia for quarterback Nick Foles, and “Schotty” no longer works for the Rams? Jake Long was released in a salary-cap move?
Oh.
Let’s talk about Foles, then. I’ll stop kidding around.
On a serious note, the Rams open camp Friday. And there’s so much to keep an eye on this summer, including the surgically repaired left knee of rookie running back Todd Gurley. And watch out for that herd of mammoth rookie offensive linemen.
But Foles is the most intriguing player in camp.
Since the Rams’ last winning season (2003), they’ve used 14 starting quarterbacks: Marc Bulger, Bradford, Kellen Clemens, Austin Davis, Shaun Hill, Jamie Martin, Chris Chandler, Kyle Boller, Keith Null, A.J. Feeley, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Gus Frerotte, Brock Berlin and Trent Green.
Foles is next in line.
What will become of him?
Eligible to become an unrestricted free agent after the season, Foles could be passing through town, one and done. Or he could take the job, own it, and provide the long-term stability that’s been missing since Bulger started 80 of a possible 96 regular-season games between 2002 and 2008.
No doubt, the constant churn at a critically important position is a factor in the Rams’ .327 winning percentage over the past 11 seasons.
With many NFL franchises, the big quarterback question at this time of the year pertains to quality: Can the talented QB lead the team to the playoffs and win a Super Bowl?
In St. Louis, with so many quarterback injuries, benchings, recycling jobs and coaching changes, the key question is much different: Do the Rams even have a QB?
In evaluating Foles, you can pretty much see what you want to see.
Hey, this is the quarterback who threw 27 touchdown passes and only two interceptions for Philadelphia in 2013. Foles was voted to the Pro Bowl, the dazzling Eagles averaged 28 points per game, went 10-6, and made the NFC playoffs.
Wow, 27 touchdowns and two pickoffs? And average of 9.1 yards per passing attempt? A passer rating of 119.2? When Kurt Warner was the pride of St. Louis, orchestrating the Greatest Show on Turf, he never had a passer rating higher than 109.2 in a season. Foles is no Warner, but he could be the best quarterback here since Bulger went to the Pro Bowl after passing for 4,301 yards in 2006.
No, no, no. Foles is a one-year wonder who crashed in 2014. Foles passed for only 13 touchdowns, lobbed too many interceptions (10), held the ball too long, took too many hits, suffered a fractured collarbone, and was abruptly cast aside by Eagles coach Chip Kelly.
Given Kelly’s obsession with offense, and his quarterback-friendly attack, why did he give up on Foles so quickly? What does that tell us? Not only that, but Kelly flipped Foles to St. Louis to gamble on Bradford. Yeah, the iron-man Bradford that missed 25 of the Rams’ previous 32 games because of two knee surgeries.
Hold on, now. Why the negativity? Foles made a great impression right away. His new teammates rave about him. The Rams have embraced Nick as the leader they’ve been waiting for.
“The chemistry has been great since day one,” wide receiver Kenny Britt told reporters. “He’s the guy that comes in the locker room and pumps people up ready to go. If you’re down, he’s the first one (saying) ‘Hey come on, we’ve gotta go right now.’ To tell you the truth, it’s kind of exciting to see him in there.”
Tight end Jared Cook co-signed the endorsement. “I’m so glad that he’s here. I love that he’s here,” Cook told the team’s web site. “I love what he brings to us, and I love the fact that he’s just an up-tempo, positive guy.”
Love was definitely in the air at Rams Park.
“Great deep ball,” Britt said. “He puts it on the money every time. He can throw every pass in the book.”
That’s nice.
As you might imagine, the opinions in Philadelphia aren’t so nice.
In a recent interview with a Philadelphia radio station, former Eagles scout Louis Riddick described an alternative version of Foles.
“I’ve talked with people directly that were with him every day and coached him, and he was the kind of guy who behind the scenes didn’t necessarily like being criticized, didn’t necessarily like maybe being coached hard, being gotten on in the way that some quarterbacks and some players can take,” Riddick said.
“So is it surprising that maybe he would fit in a little bit better in a town like St. Louis where, not necessarily that they don’t have high expectations, but it’s not the same kind of scrutiny he’ll face here in Philadelphia? Yeah, that doesn’t shock me. That doesn’t shock me that he would feel more comfortable there.”
Speaking to ESPN’s Mike Sando, one anonymous NFL head coach said he’d be delighted to have Foles … at No. 2 on the depth chart.
“You wish he was your backup because he could go win some games for you,” the coach said. “But I wouldn’t want him to be my starter.”
This is confusing, yes?
Foles is either (1) a natural-born leader of men who puts every throw on the money; or (2) he’s thin-skinned, can’t take the heat, couldn’t wait to duck behind the low expectations in St. Louis and is no better than a good backup.
I’m neutral for now. I like Foles’ potential, but he could go either way.
Foles could be the answer, the solution, the missing piece. Or he could go missing, like the many Rams quarterbacks that have come and gone.
znModeratorI’m in the heart of Greater-Appalachia.
According to the algebra, we are the
Unhappiest, Unhealthiest, most Paranoid
citizens of this great, red, white and blue,
Mega-Theo-Military-Industrial-Unsustainable-biosphere-killing-Corporotacracy-Thingy.w
v
I think that whole map just manifests a secret American fantasy to appropriate Canada and Mexico.
July 25, 2015 at 1:12 pm in reply to: Mikes Sando: ranking qbs, including the long version ranking all major starters #27564
znModeratorNick Foles at No. 22 in league insiders’ quarterback rankings
Nick Wagoner
EARTH CITY, Mo. — In what has become an annual project for ESPN NFL Insider Mike Sando, he’s once again surveyed 35 NFL personnel evaluators and coaches in an effort to properly rank the league’s quarterbacks.
Sando asked the panel to offer a score between one and five for each player with a “one” defined as a signal caller capable of carrying a team from week to week to contender status. A “five” is reserved for the worst but generally not used for starting quarterbacks in the league, even those at the bottom of the list.
The St. Louis Rams changed quarterbacks this offseason, trading Sam Bradford to the Philadelphia Eagles for Nick Foles and draft pick consideration. According to the way the numbers came out in Sando’ survey, the Rams upgraded… barely. The rankings saw Foles come in at No. 22 on the list with an average rating of 3.2. Bradford checked in at No. 23 with an average rating of 3.23.
Foles’ rating dropped from No. 15 last year when he was coming off a big 2013 season in which he threw 27 touchdowns and just two interceptions. But he was unable to duplicate that success in eight games last year before an injury ended his season early. That seems to be the primary reason for the drop off and Foles’ presence in the third “tier” among quarterbacks.
As you’d expect, those doubting Foles question how he’ll fare outside the confines of Chip Kelly’s offense in Philadelphia. Likewise, those uncertain about Bradford wonder whether he can stay healthy.
.
July 25, 2015 at 1:10 pm in reply to: Mikes Sando: ranking qbs, including the long version ranking all major starters #27563
znModeratorDebating Russell Wilson’s place in QB Tier rankings
Mike Sando, NFL Insider
There’s a theory circulating among a few of the NFL personnel evaluators, coaches and agents I’ve spoken with about quarterbacks recently. It’s only a theory. The Seattle Seahawks could blow it out of the water by signing Russell Wilson to a monster contract. Until that happens, the theory will live in the minds of those who like Wilson’s game but do not love it.
The theory, raised by some of the 35 coaches and evaluators who participated in our second annual Quarterback Tiers project, says the team could be reluctant to pay Wilson at the high end of the quarterback scale. Why? For a few reasons — reasons that made Wilson the most debated quarterback our survey. Some of those appear below.
Eleven of the 35 voters placed Wilson in the highest of five tiers, but one thought he would not stay there because defenses would solve him, especially if Seattle’s own defense declined and running back Marshawn Lynch retired. Twenty-three other voters put Wilson in the second tier (some of those voters thought he would not ascend higher). A single voter placed Wilson in the third tier and did not waver during a cross-examination I witnessed at a social gathering featuring this Wilson skeptic and another coach.
The debate begins with that conversation featuring a defensive coach, the Wilson skeptic (an offensive coordinator) and me. The debate continues with testimonials from voters who placed Wilson in the top two tiers, with and without conditions. It’s a look into the notes I kept when the quarterback conversation turned to Wilson this offseason.
The Tier 3 rationaleSando: OK, so why is Russell Wilson a 3?
Offensive coordinator: Because I think he needs Marshawn Lynch and the defense to do what he has done.
Defensive coach: That’s not the way it really is because he is way better than you think coming from behind in the two-minute offense. They’ve been way behind and he’s rallied them back.
—
REST OF THE ARTICLE IS ON ESPN INSIDER
July 25, 2015 at 1:08 pm in reply to: Mikes Sando: ranking qbs, including the long version ranking all major starters #27562
znModerator
znModeratorRamBill
The first snap Bradford takes in a real game means the most the Rams would have to give back would be a 4th round pick. If he plays 50% of the snaps they owe the Eagles nothing.
znModeratorSweeeeeeet. Thank you!
What’s your early prediction on the Rams at this point, w?
znModeratorI see nothing ugly about a skull. To convey what meaning you describe why not eliminate the head altogether holding a mask up to nothing?
I don’t personally think that the word “ugly” applies either way, but that’s just me being all “strictly speaking” about it. On the other hand, a skull cannot help but be evocative of death and mortality. If the image was of nothing so not a skull, it would just have an entirely different meaning.
IMO…but also, since the entire image echoes Japanese styles, I think it’s also evokes the geisha figure. The traditional geisha wore thick white makeup with a line left around the hairline to create the effect of a mask. So it’s a kind of ironic geisha.
July 24, 2015 at 11:59 pm in reply to: piling up the "training camp preview" articles, starting with Prisco #27548
znModeratorOK, relax. I won’t go into it all. You guys know the drill
Lol. Your posts are always appreciated, RFL, and always enjoyable reads. I don’t always see eye to eye with every single point, but, I for one (and probably speaking for others) like your stuff.
znModeratorAnd the logic of the facts W himself cites undermines his big point–the demand for more passing stats. Kendricks’ versatility has value in itself, so much value that the Rams extended him. Apparently, they see his ability to receive AND BLOCK as a worthwhile “return on investment” in itself. Maybe, W should realize that and learn to value what Kendricks actually IS and always has been!
Hear, hear.
July 24, 2015 at 8:10 pm in reply to: piling up the "training camp preview" articles, starting with Prisco #27543
znModeratorRams Fantasy Preview
Silva
http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/55343/59/offseason-low-down
Rams Year in Review
2014 Pass Attempts Rank: 23rd (515)
2014 Rush Attempts Rank: 26th (395)
2014 Total Offensive Plays Rank: 30th (957)
2014 Yards Per Play Rank: 19th (5.3)Projected Starting Lineup
QB: Nick Foles
RB: Todd Gurley
WR: Kenny Britt
WR: Brian Quick
TE: Jared Cook
TE: Lance Kendricks
LT: Greg Robinson
LG: Rodger Saffold
C: Tim Barnes
RG: Jamon Brown
RT: Rob HavensteinPassing Game Outlook
“Aberration,” “anomaly,” and “fluke” are words most-often used to describe Nick Foles’ 2013, in which he posted a 27:2 TD-to-INT ratio across ten starts while leading the NFL in yards per attempt (9.1). Foles’ YPA regressed to 7.0 last year with 13 touchdowns and 10 picks before his season was cut short by a fractured collarbone. Foles ranked 26th in pass attempts two seasons ago — diminishing the sample size — while Philadelphia finished first in rushing yards and yards per carry. Foles’ 2013 will prove a statistical outlier, but I don’t believe he ever truly changed his stripes. His efficiency was elevated by a league-best running game, an offensive line that started every game together, DeSean Jackson and Riley Cooper’s career years, and the newness of Chip Kelly’s innovative offense. As the Eagles’ 2014 run game fell off dramatically, the line endured crippling injuries, Jackson left, Cooper devolved into a league-worst receiver, and the shine of Kelly’s offense wore off a bit, Foles’ production tumbled sharply. Foles has a strong arm and can be an effective pocket manager, but he is a quarterback who is only as good as the parts around him. He’s best utilized as a low-volume passer who can threaten on occasional shot plays. The parts around Foles are significantly worse in St. Louis, while Foles will no longer benefit from the play volume, creativity, and high-percentage nature of Kelly’s scheme. Foles’ new offensive coordinator is someone named “Frank Cignetti.” As a Ram, Foles’ fantasy outlook is bleak.
Kenny Britt will probably never fulfill the early-career promise he flashed in Tennessee, but he came a long way to show signs of being a useful NFL receiver last year. Britt posted a 48-748-3 receiving line on 84 targets, averaging 15.6 yards per catch and staying healthy for the first time since his 2009 rookie year. Still only 26 — he turns 27 in September — Britt re-signed with St. Louis on an incentive-laden two-year deal. With Brian Quick coming off a severe shoulder injury, Britt should have every opportunity to establish himself as Nick Foles’ No. 1 option in the passing game. Britt’s ceiling is lowered by St. Louis’ run-first offense and Britt’s own loss of explosiveness, but I like him as a late-round best-ball pick and sleeper to catch 60-plus balls.
To open last year, the light finally appeared to flip in former No. 33 overall pick Brian Quick’s third NFL season. Emerging as a true No. 1 receiver the Rams so desperately need, Quick was on pace for a 64-973-8 line through six games before a shoulder injury ended his season in Week 8. Quick is huge (6’4/220) with long arms (34 1/4″), and can be an animal when he plays physically. And after dealing with Shaun Hill and Austin Davis in 2014, Quick gets a quarterback upgrade in Nick Foles. Quick’s biggest obstacle is an extensive shoulder operation that repaired his rotator cuff and three torn ligaments, while also costing Quick all of OTAs and minicamp with a new quarterback and offensive coordinator. If Quick does get healthy by Week 1, he will be a sneaky breakout candidate. Quick’s physical skill set is superior to Kenny Britt’s at this stage.
Stedman Bailey and Tavon Austin will vie for sub-package snaps when the Rams use more than two receivers, or perhaps even for a starting job if Brian Quick isn’t ready for Week 1. Austin was a much-higher draft pick, but Bailey is a far-better wide receiver and shined in his 2014 opportunities, leading the St. Louis wideout corps in yards after catch, yards after catch per reception, and broken tackles while also receiving terrific PFF run-blocking grades. Although Austin’s failures have widely been blamed on outgoing OC Brian Schottenheimer by those who loved him coming out of college and are consumed by that false narrative, Austin is in fact small (5’9/174) and plays small, has below-average hands, and plays the game without any semblance of physicality. He is Dexter McCluster 2.0. In re-draft and Dynasty leagues, 24-year-old Bailey is the player to keep an eye on. Bailey is deserving of a big role in OC Frank Cignetti’s offense. The only question is whether he’ll get it.
Another contact-averse Rams skill player is Jared Cook, whose soft playing style has long limited his red-zone effectiveness and whose inability to move quickly in short areas has prevented Cook from becoming a high-volume pass catcher. Cook is big (6’5/246) and legitimately runs like a wide receiver (4.50), but he is a straight-linish seam stretcher only, and not a safety-valve tight end who can make things happen on checkdowns. Cook has still finished as a top-15 fantasy tight end in three of the last four seasons, though that’s due largely to the weakness of the tight end position in fantasy football, and not to Cook’s accomplishments. I do think Cook is an underrated TE3 pick in best-ball leagues, where he often lasts until the very last few rounds.
Running Game Outlook
No. 10 overall pick Todd Gurley was a dominant three-down back when healthy in the SEC, turning 510 career carries into 3,285 yards (6.44 YPC) and 36 TDs. He added 65 receptions and six more scores in the passing game. A legitimately special talent with elite tackle-breaking ability and home-run speed, Gurley was also one of the top pass-protecting backs in the 2015 class. Gurley’s skill set is undeniable, but his injury history is concerning. Even before tearing his ACL last November, Gurley battled a torn hip flexor and high ankle sprain in 2013, costing him three games and affecting him in others. Offseason reports on Gurley’s ACL recovery have been upbeat, which was expected. His Week 1 availability remains in doubt, with reserve/PUP — a designation that would cost Gurley the first six games — remaining a real possibility. When Gurley is ready to play, he’ll run behind one of the league’s worst offensive lines in what projects as one of the league’s lowest-scoring offenses. Gurley is talented enough to make my approach to him look stupid, but I’m having a hard time drafting him at his round-four ADP.
Tre Mason returns from a rookie season where he overtook Zac Stacy in Week 7 and piled up 13-plus carries in all but one of St. Louis’ final nine games, averaging a crisp 4.27 YPC despite running behind an offensive line that Football Outsiders graded in the bottom half of the league, and with people named Austin Davis and Shaun Hill at quarterback. Mason showed concerning boom-or-bust tendencies, but did face a schedule of Seattle, San Francisco, and Arizona twice, as well as Denver and Washington. When Mason played the Raiders and Giants, he lit them up. Mason, who doesn’t turn 22 until August 6, is an explosive runner with big-play ability and can handle heavy workloads, exhibiting the traits of a potentially-dynamic workhorse back. While the Rams’ selection of Todd Gurley takes a lot of wind out of Mason’s fantasy sails, the rookie’s injury woes figure to lead to playing time for Mason this year. Mason typically goes in the seventh to ninth rounds of drafts. I like him as an RB3/4 in rounds eight and nine.
Vegas Win Total
Although Jeff Fisher has the reputation of an “8-8 coach,” he’s actually failed to reach eight wins each of his three years in St. Louis. The Rams finally have theoretical quarterback stability after acquiring Nick Foles, but Foles is not the kind of player capable of turning a passing game from a weakness into a strength. On the offensive line, the Rams will start an all-rookie right side of RG Jamon Brown and RT Rob Havenstein, while practice-squad-type Tim Barnes is penciled in at center. The defense is ferocious up front, but vulnerable in the back. I see the Rams as an 8-8 team and so does Vegas, setting their Win Total at 8.0 games. A non-division slate of the AFC North, NFC North, Tampa, and Washington makes me lean toward guessing the Rams go 7-9
znModeratorfrom off the net
==
max
Anyone hear Jeanne Zelasko?
Yesterday on the Beast, she had Howard Balzer on talking about the NFL position on StL stadium progress. Of course, Balzer gave the pro StL viewpoint. But it was Zelasko that surprised me.
Zelasko went on to say that her sources told her things have changed regarding the Rams recently. They may not be coming to LA. She cited 2 major reasons. One is that the NFL is gonna have a very hard time turning down money from StL, especially when they don’t see much coming from SD and Oak. She said that the guys on the LA committee, like Kraft and Mara, will have a hard time snubbing StL if they come up with all the money to build a new stadium. And that committee will set the stage for what the NFL does regarding LA. Second is that she heard that Kroenke had made a promise to all the owners that he will not go rogue and move to LA regardless. She said this is a 180 degree change from she has been hearing regarding the Rams, and she said the Rams are very frustrated with these developments.
I am a bit confused about what Zelasko is all about. Is she a reputable sports reporter or is she just someone who likes to throw crap out there to fill air time? She has been all over the place on the NFL to LA story, so I just can’t get a read on her.
znModerator49ers have lost more playing time than any other team
Michael David Smith
In an offseason that started with the departure of Jim Harbaugh and most of his staff, the 49ers have also lost more contributions from players than any other team. According to ESPN, the players who left the 49ers this offseason played a whopping 37 percent of the team’s total snaps last year. That’s the most snaps lost of any team in the NFL.
Among the players who were significant contributors for the 49ers last year and won’t be on the team this year are:
Left guard Mike Iupati (1,003 snaps)
Cornerback Perrish Cox (1,003 snaps)
Cornerback Chris Culliver (821 snaps)
Defensive lineman Ray McDonald (724 snaps)
Wide receiver Michael Crabtree (722 snaps)
Defensive lineman Justin Smith (701 snaps)
Offensive lineman Jonathan Martin (685 snaps)
Running back Frank Gore (647 snaps)
Linebacker Chris Borland (608 snaps)
Linebacker Dan Skuta (572 snaps)
Right tackle Anthony Davis (456 snaps)
Linebacker Patrick Willis (366 snaps)
Wide receiver Brandon Lloyd (335 snaps)
Special teamer Kassim Osgood (254 snaps)
Punter Andy Lee (145 snaps)
Safety Bubba Ventrone (139 snaps)(Snap counts via Football Outsiders)
The 49ers added players in the draft and free agency, but it’s hard to believe those additions will be enough to make up for the losses. Which means the 49ers, who took a step backward from 12-4 in 2013 to 8-8 in 2014, are probably going to take another step backward in 2015.
znModeratorSorry but it still doesn’t make any sense. Especially since a mask is used. Everyone has a skull and it isn’t a choice. A mask to hide a skull?
It’s not literal. It’s metaphorical. If flesh is a mask to hide a skull, that means many things…including (among others) that beauty is only a mask hiding our vulnerability and mortality.
-
AuthorPosts


