Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 42,481 through 42,510 (of 47,024 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    image: http://walterfootball.com/images/fball/rams3_logo.gif

    http://walterfootball.com/offseason2015stl.php

    St. Louis Rams (Last Year: 6-10)

    2015 NFL Season Preview:

    2015 St. Louis Rams Analysis: The Rams will once again be very competitive, but a brutal early schedule, a weak offensive line, and Todd Gurley’s expected missed playing time could do them in. St. Louis will once again be close to owning a .500 record, but it probably won’t be able to make the push into the playoffs.

    Veteran Additions:

    QB Nick Foles, QB Case Keenum, G Mike Person, DT Nick Fairley, OLB Akeem Ayers.

    Early Draft Picks:

    RB Todd Gurley, OT Rob Havenstein, OT Jamon Brown, QB Sean Mannion, OT Andrew Donnal. Rams Rookie Forecast

    Offseason Losses:

    QB Sam Bradford, QB Shaun Hill, RB Zac Stacy, OT Jake Long, OT Joseph Barksdale, G Davin Joseph, C Scott Wells, DT Kendall Langford.

    2015 St. Louis Rams Offense:

    The Rams never had a chance last year because Sam Bradford tore his ACL during the preseason. Of course, this was expected, given how injury-prone Bradford has been over the years. St. Louis fans always had to hold their breath every time Bradford was tackled or simply fell down on his own, so it must be a relief for them that they no longer have to do that.

    Having said that, Nick Foles isn’t completely durable either, having missed eight games in 2014. Foles did well in Chip Kelly’s offense and was on pace for a 4,000-yard season prior to going down with a broken collarbone. Foles’ numbers will definitely decrease in a lower-volume, run-based offense, as the Rams will ask him to manage games instead of throw 40 times. This could be an issue because of Foles’ accuracy – he completed 59.8 percent of his passes this past season – though being more reliable than Bradford, he’s obviously an upgrade over the two backup signal-callers who quarterbacked the Rams in Bradford’s absence last year.

    It’ll be ideal if St. Louis can establish a constant, dominant ground attack to keep Foles’ passes to a minimum. The front office had this in mind when it spent the No. 10 overall selection on Todd Gurley. The Georgia product was considered the best running back prospect since Adrian Peterson, and one team thought so highly of him that it labeled him to be the next Jim Brown. The current problem is that Gurley is coming off a torn ACL, so he might miss the first few weeks of the season. Tre Mason, who gained 765 yards as a rookie last year, will carry the load in his absence.

    Gurley and Mason are talented, but will they have adequate running lanes to burst through? That’s a legitimate concern, as both tackles from last year, Jake Long and Joseph Barksdale, are gone. The Rams will go with the underwhelming duo of Greg Robinson and Rob Havenstein as replacements. Robinson, the No. 2 overall pick in the 2014 NFL Draft, struggled mightily when thrust into action during his rookie campaign. He might improve, but he looked like he had a long way to go. Havenstein, meanwhile, was widely considered a reach in the second round this spring. Being completely unproven, Havenstein could perform poorly, and it wouldn’t surprise anyone.

    It’s only better in the interior of the offensive line by default. Left guard Rodger Saffold is the best blocker the team has by a wide margin, but he also has durability concerns. Last year’s starting center and right guard, Scott Wells and Davin Joseph, are also off the team, so two of Tim Barnes, Barrett Jones or Andrew Donnal will start in their place. Barnes, an undrafted free agent back in 2011, has just four career starts under his belt, and didn’t look good in any of them. Jones, a fourth-round choice in 2013, has barely seen the field. Donnal is a fourth-round rookie, so it’s impossible to know what he’ll bring to the table.

    It’s likely that Foles won’t have much time in the pocket, so he obviously will have to lean on throwing the ball to solid intermediate target Jared Cook rather than connecting with his band of No. 2 receivers. Brian Quick is the best of the bunch – he had some big performances early in 2014 – but missed nine games because of a shoulder injury. Kenny Britt is the other starter, while Stedman Bailey will man the slot. Britt, only 26, is capable of being extremely productive – he had a 9-103 line in Week 16 – but injuries and lack of motivation are concerns with him. Bailey is a neat option, but I’m sure St. Louis would rather have former first-rounder Tavon Austin be more productive. Austin, who had 31 catches this past season, has been nothing more than a gimmick player thus far. Offensive coordinator Frank Cignetti told the media that he plans on getting Austin more involved, but it remains to be seen how realistic that plan is.

    2015 St. Louis Rams Defense:

    The Rams will once again have to lean on their defense to carry them, at least until Todd Gurley returns from injury. It didn’t look like the St. Louis stop unit was going to have much success this past season when it surrendered multiple 30-point performances in the early going, but the team limited the opposition to just 19.9 points per game beginning in Week 6. The difference? Aaron Donald.

    Donald, the 2014 NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year, was just a part-time player until Jeff Fisher made the decision to insert the Pittsburgh product into the starting lineup. The impact was tremendous, as Donald dominated the trenches in all aspects. He clogged running lanes and aside from Robert Quinn, he happened to be the team’s best pass-rusher, accumulating nine sacks. That’s a big number for a defensive tackle who didn’t make a start until Week 6. And what’s scary is that he did this as a mere rookie. He could be even better in 2015.

    The Rams have a very talented group up front overall with Donald, the otherworldly Quinn, Chris Long and Michael Brockers as the starters. Long didn’t perform well last season because he played through the final few weeks on one leg. Brockers has never developed into the pass-rusher the Rams were hoping he would be when they chose him in the first round of the 2012 NFL Draft, but he’s very effective at containing the run. Besides, St. Louis can substitute Brockers with the newly acquired Nick Fairley on passing downs. Fairley has work-ethic concerns, but his talent level is off the charts, and when motivated, he can be an absolute terror on the interior.

    St. Louis will once again be able to generate tons of pressure, which will continue to aid the secondary. All four starters plus the nickel will return in 2015, as no changes were made to this group. The top corner, Janoris Jenkins, didn’t perform especially well this past season because he was hampered by a lingering knee injury. He should bounce back to form, if healthy. He’ll start across from E.J. Gaines, who surprised many by being effective despite being a sixth-round rookie. Trumaine Johnson will reprise his role as an adequate slot corner.

    Rounding out the secondary, T.J. McDonald and Rodney McLeod figure to start at safety, though Mark Barron, acquired via trade during the 2014 campaign, will fight for playing time. Both McDonald and McLeod were solid, but unspectacular last season. Barron, being a former first-round choice, is more talented than them, so it’s possible that he could crack the lineup.

    The weakest group in St. Louis’ defense is the linebacking corps. James Laurinaitis is a big name, but he hasn’t played well in years, and he actually has regressed each season. Former first-rounder Alec Ogletree also needs to step up, as he has disappointed thus far in his career. Akeem Ayers, signed over from the Patriots, figures to be a solid contributor on the first two downs.

    2015 St. Louis Rams Schedule and Intangibles:

    Remember when the Edwards Jones Dome was such a huge advantage for the Greatest Show on Turf? The magic is gone, as the Rams went just 3-5 as hosts last year. They lost by double digits at home on three occasions.

    Greg Zuerlein’s nickname is “Greg the Leg” because of his massive kicking power. He blasted 5-of-7 tries from 50-plus this past season, but hit just 80 percent of his kicks overall. He nailed 92.9 percent of his tries the year before.

    Johnny Hekker maintained the highest net-punting average at 44.2 in 2013, and he was fourth in that category this past season (42.3).

    St. Louis was great on special teams last year, though it did have some trouble defending kickoffs. However, the team scored twice on punt returns, outgaining the opposition by more than six yards on those.

    Four of the Rams’ initial five games are against the Seahawks, Steelers, Cardinals and Packers. A 1-4 start could capsize their playoff hopes, though their slate definitely gets easier after that.

    in reply to: New class of antibiotics found in soil. #27670
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    In Maine.

    Bio-engineering and other bio industries are real big here.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Adam Schefter: Rams coordinator Fassel helps save swimmer in distress

    http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=espn:13325679

    in reply to: Wagoner: what to expect from Rams rookies #27659
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    What to expect from Rams rookies drafted in final four rounds

    Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/19708/what-to-expect-from-rams-rookies-drafted-in-final-four-rounds

    EARTH CITY, Mo. — The St. Louis Rams rookie class reports for duty today with the veterans joining them on Wednesday and training camp officially starting Friday.

    With that in mind, let’s rewind to the 2015 NFL draft and offer some thoughts on what to expect from the members of this year’s draft class as we head into training camp and beyond. Earlier today, we looked at the picks from the first three rounds, now we’ll examine the rest of the group.

    OT Andrew Donnal, fourth round: The third of four (eventually five) offensive linemen drafted by the Rams, Donnal probably won’t be asked to do much but offer solid depth in his first camp and season with the team. He comes to the Rams with plenty of experience and part of his training camp could be spent on working on some versatility so that he can help at guard or tackle. But the Rams signed veteran Garrett Reynolds in the offseason and he figures to be the first lineman off the bench in the event of injury or struggles at any spot except center. Which means Donnal will have some time to get acclimated before much is expected of him.

    WR Bud Sasser, sixth round: Unfortunately for Sasser, a medical condition left him unable to be cleared to play for the Rams and he was released in the spring.

    OG Cody Wichmann, sixth round: Much like Donnal, Wichmann’s top priority will be working to add depth to the interior of the offensive line. The Rams seem to be well stocked with options and assuming Reynolds is the primary backup at both tackle and both guard spots, Wichmann would be the guard equivalent of Donnal at tackle. For Wichmann, though, it seems a roster spot is not guaranteed. His future could depend greatly on who wins the center battle and his ability to offer some semblance of versatility. For backup linemen in this league, especially for the Rams, the ability to play multiple positions is often a golden ticket to a roster spot.

    LB Bryce Hager, seventh round: The Rams aren’t exactly flush with depth at linebacker which means there could be a clear path for Hager to win a spot on the 53-man roster out of camp. Behind the starters, the Rams have the loser of the strong side job between Akeem Ayers and Jo-Lonn Dunbar and special teams ace Daren Bates. They figure to keep about six at the position and Hager would seem to have as good a chance as any to earn his way to the roster. For Hager, his primary job in camp will be proving himself on special teams. There isn’t much expected of him in the way of contributing to the defense but if he can be a core special teams player, he should be able to stick.

    DL Martin Ifedi, seventh round: Ifedi gets the honor of being the next seventh-round lineman attempting to elbow his way through a crowded group on the defensive line. Of course, Ifedi will come without the attention of last year’s seventh-round end Michael Sam. The Rams have traditionally gone heavy on defensive linemen, keeping nine or 10 which would give Ifedi a shot. Similar to the offensive linemen, the ability to play inside and out would be a boon for Ifedi’s chances. He’ll likely find himself in a tight competition with the likes of defensive tackle Louis Trinca-Pasat and Ethan Westbrooks for a potential eighth or ninth spot on the line.

    OT Isaiah Battle, fifth round (supplemental): Rams general manager Les Snead essentially left no room for guessing on what Battle’s role will be in 2015. Snead even went so far to use the term “redshirt year” when discussing Battle’s first season. In other words, he’s not expected to contribute right away and will get to add strength and learn the offense in his first year. Still, it seems unlikely the Rams will be able to stash him on the practice squad in the first year so he will have to take up a roster spot in the meantime. In the long term, though, some believe Battle could eventually push Havenstein for the right tackle job if he develops as expected.

    in reply to: Cody Wichmann placed on PUP list #27658
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The PUP list doesn’t count against the 90, right? Or does it?

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Notes from around the league

    Jason La Canfora

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jason-la-canfora/25251211/inside-football-whats-taking-so-long-for-a-deflategate-decision

    Why the hell hasn’t Roger Goodell made a Deflategate decision yet?

    As I’ve noted many times, nothing, when it comes to matters of NFL discipline, should surprise anyone at this point. It’s impossible to predict the ebb and flow many of these matters take, and the league will do what the league wants when it wants to do it.

    But, come on man.

    We are a half a year removed from the game in question taking place, we are months removed from Ted Wells’ grand-standing conference call where he tried to defend his report and we are weeks removed from Tom Brady spending a day at the NFL offices to plead his case in his appeal.

    As I discussed when filling in for Doug Gottlieb a few weeks back, the longer this thing goes, the more I believe Goodell is going through backchannels to try to broker a deal both sides can live with. It may be impossible in the end, but the NFL wants this wrapped up in a bow whenever the appeal decision is made, and would love to have an outcome that doesn’t involve arguably the best quarterback of all-time suing the NFL as the backdrop to this Super Bowl 50 season.

    I don’t see Brady taking any deal that involved a suspension, though a fine of a few game checks might be palatable. With camps opening, Goodell is running out of time not to have this bleed into Hall of Fame weekend, etc, and I certainly don’t see Brady backing down now. The NFL can say there is no timetable, but a team deserves the right to know going into camp exactly what sentence a player is facing, particularly one of this magnitude.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Notes from around the league

    Jason La Canfora

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jason-la-canfora/25251211/inside-football-whats-taking-so-long-for-a-deflategate-decision

    St. Louis Rams

    The Rams made a concerted effort to fortify their offensive line but several scouts from other teams question if the unit was going to be up to snuff. The fact the Rams used a supplemental pick on a linemen they figure to “redshirt” for a year raised eyebrows as well, given that this would seem to be a make-or-break year for them and their regime. A move to Los Angeles would only further work in coach Jeff Fisher’s favor in terms of an extension, given his strong Southern California ties, but it remains to be seen if owner Stan Kroenke has curried enough favor with other owners to get the votes to move. Kroenke going rogue might be his only way. Without improved play from the line I wouldn’t brace for a whole lot of out Nick Foles, who, when he shined in Philadelphia, did so in the scope of an innovative scheme and with what was the best line in the NFL that season.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Sando: If Foles is Even Average, Rams are Still in Better Shape

    Nick Foles doesn’t have to be a top tier quarterback for the Rams to be in better shape than the past few years. ESPN’s Mike Sando tells Kevin Wheeler why.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    RFL, I read somewhere that Foles would be a good fit for our offense because he is very good at selling play action and making accurate passes in short to medium routes.

    I don’t think any article said that.

    Actually we posters here have been saying that.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Here’s a bunch of more stuff on ACL injuries and surgery:

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/will-todd-gurley-be-ready-to-go/

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/whats-the-deal-with-acls/

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/acl-recovery-time/

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/experts-say-re-injured-acls-are-common-pd/

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/what-is-the-timeframe-on-acl-recoveries/

    ————-

    Are Bad Knees in Our Genes?

    http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/29/phys-ed-are-bad-knees-in-our-genes/?_r=0

    Are fragile knees inherited? That intriguing question motivated a new study published earlier this month in The British Journal of Sports Medicine, during which researchers looked at one family’s propensity for shredding anterior cruciate ligaments during sports. The report was part of a much larger, ongoing study of risk factors for A.C.L. injury, led by researchers affiliated with the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Ohio State University, which involves thousands of young athletes. For this pocket version of the larger experiment, the scientists singled out a set of fraternal twin girls who already had been videotaped in the laboratory while wearing reflective markers. The angles of their knees during landing and cutting maneuvers had been analyzed, and the knees themselves measured. At the time of the taping, both girls’ knees were healthy. But within a year, each had suffered a catastrophic A.C.L. tear during separate volleyball and basketball games, as had an older sister, who wasn’t part of the original study.
    Phys Ed

    “We thought this repeated incidence of A.C.L. tears within one family was important to look at,” said Timothy Hewett, the director of sports-medicine research for Ohio State University and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and lead author of the new study. “In my lab, we have another set of twins, identical young women, who are post-docs. They both had torn their A.C.L.’s” as high school athletes. “Their father, who is one of a set of triplets, also had torn his A.C.L.,” as had his two triplet brothers, Dr. Hewett said. “Those incidences,” together with the injuries to the fraternal twins, “made us wonder, How much does familial predisposition influence your risk for an A.C.L. tear?”

    The answer may be quite a bit. What Dr. Hewett and his colleagues found when they parsed the data about the fraternal twin girls’ knees was that each had unusually loose, flexible knee joints, or “Gumby knees,” as Dr. Hewett called them. Each also angled at least one knee outward during landings and had narrower-than-average notches in the knee bone, where the A.C.L. attaches to the bone. Each of these conditions previously had been identified as a risk factor for an A.C.L. tear, but they hadn’t been shown to cluster within a family. “It appears that the propensity to be at high risk for an A.C.L. tear is definitely heritable,” Dr. Hewett said.

    Anyone who has an active daughter or who follows the sports pages knows that the incidence of non-contact-related A.C.L. tears among young female athletes is high and increasing. Many strength- and balance-training programs have been developed to try to reduce the number of these A.C.L. injuries. But part of the problem with the
    training programs, Dr. Hewett said, “is that they’ll only work if they reach the girls who actually are at risk,” because of how their knees are built. “Otherwise it’s like giving antibiotics to someone who doesn’t have an infection. It won’t work.”

    As a result, some of the most engrossing recent A.C.L. injury research has been aimed at finding at-risk knees, in part by probing the genetics of weak A.C.L.’s. In the past year, a flurry of new studies have identified several genes that seem to be closely associated with A.C.L. tears. One representative experiment, produced by scientists at the University of Cape Town in South Africa and published in June, sequenced gene segments from 129 volunteers who had torn an A.C.L., 38 of them women, and compared them with the same gene sequences in 216 active but uninjured people (a third of them were women too). They found that the women who had torn their A.C.L.’s were significantly more likely to share a specific variation in one of their genes. The gene is known to affect the suppleness of collagen or connective tissue in tendons and ligaments like the A.C.L. Most of the men in both groups and the uninjured women didn’t have that genetic variant. Similarly, in another experiment by the same group of scientists, published in November, a separate gene variant was found to be more common in women who had ruptured their A.C.L.’s. That gene variant also affects the makeup of the collagen in tendons. No one knows yet whether women who carry both variants of the genes might be at especially high risk of an A.C.L. rupture.

    But the emerging genetics of A.C.L. injury do raise the possibility that “in the not-so-distant future we might be able to screen” the DNA of young athletes and find those at highest injury risk, Dr. Hewett said. Obviously, he added, much work remains to be done in the field. The genetic variants so far associated with A.C.L. injury risk have been found primarily in injured women. But men injure their A.C.L.’s, in higher raw numbers than women, since so many more men participate in sports that threaten knees (soccer, basketball and skiing, for instance). Are there genetic risk factors for men? Should all young athletes be screened, if and when a viable screening test becomes available? And given that no A.C.L. injury prevention program has yet proved wholly successful, what advice do you give a young woman athlete whose genetic test shows that her knee is extremely vulnerable?

    “There’s so much we still have to learn and think about,” Dr. Hewett said.

    For now, the takeaway from the current research is simple. Look to your family. “If you have a first-generation relative, a sibling or parent, who has torn an A.C.L., you are likely to be at above-average risk,” Dr. Hewett said, and might want to investigate the availability of A.C.L. injury prevention programs in your area. You also can find self-guided programs online at a number of Web sites and on YouTube. Genetics will, of course, never provide “all of the answers to the question of why” some people tear an A.C.L. and others in the same situation do not, Dr. Hewett said. “But this field does give us another piece of the puzzle.”

    in reply to: Rookies set to report to Rams Park #27632
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rookies set to report to Rams Park

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The chatty Cathy’s talking crap about Foles long after the trade while raising a shit storm at the time of the trade. Pathetic.

    Okay. But IMO this is all just “prior to camp, where do teams stand at qb” stuff. We’re just not posting it for all 32 teams. No one is complaining about the trade or saying it was a bad one. We always knew there were questions about 2014. There’s a mix of different answers to that I think.

    My comment was directed at the comments questioning Foles ability to do the work, to accept being coached, handling criticism and so on. The reaction at the time of the trade Philly was that they didn’t want to trade Foles. Now when he’s been out of town they want to tear him down? To what? Build up Bradford? Kelly? It’s pathetic.

    No one said he couldn’t or didn’t do the work. They did say he didn’t take well to tough coaching, but that apparently has to do more with one coach (the qb coach). I have no reason to doubt that, and I also don’t think it’s a big deal—I gather the issue was that one qb coach, not coachING in general. Sounds like a style clash with one qb coach. We do know that Kelly soured on Foles during the season…that was reported during the season. Foles was never Kelly’s guy IMO. In fact the Eagles fan I posted in this thread who doesn’t like Kelly makes that clear.

    My take on all of this is that Foles wasn’t as good a fit in Phil as he will be in St. Louis.

    I have no stakes in the Kelly game. If people don’t like him, that’s fine with me.

    .

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The chatty Cathy’s talking crap about Foles long after the trade while raising a shit storm at the time of the trade. Pathetic.

    Okay. But IMO this is all just “prior to camp, where do teams stand at qb” stuff. We’re just not posting it for all 32 teams. No one is complaining about the trade or saying it was a bad one. We always knew there were questions about 2014. There’s a mix of different answers to that I think.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    this reporting is pathetic.

    What did you find pathetic? Just curious. I don’t have any stake in any of these pieces in this thread, just posting them…I just wonder what’s on your mind.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator
    in reply to: Nick Wagoner: Rams mailbag, parts 1 and 2 #27619
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams mailbag: Identifying camp’s biggest position battles

    Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/19685/rams-mailbag-identifying-camps-biggest-position-battles

    EARTH CITY, Mo. — Well, we are almost there. The St. Louis Rams are set to open training camp on Friday with rookies reporting Monday and the veterans jumping in on Wednesday.

    But before we get there, we’ve got time for another edition of the Rams Twitter mailbag.

    As always, you can find me on Twitter @nwagoner. Please use hashtag #RamsMail so I can see your questions. On to business.

    SeattleRams @seattlerams
    Headed into camp, which position battles look to be the most contested over the summer? Center? OLB? 3rd RB?

    @nwagoner: Center is certainly the one that takes the prize here. I legitimately wouldn’t be surprised by any outcome in that battle between Barrett Jones, Tim Barnes and Demetrius Rhaney. For perspective, last week I projected Barnes as the starter heading into camp (though it’s really a dead heat) but also believe that he could be cut when they get to 53. The Rams are going to rotate all three players with the first-team offense and I believe they’d like Jones to win the job and Rhaney offers more upside. At this point, Barnes has some starting experience but that might not be enough to save his job after we go through camp and the preseason. And for what it’s worth, had the Rams not drafted tackle Isaiah Battle, I could’ve seen a scenario in which all three centers made the cut to 53. Maybe injuries will factor in and change things again, but attempting to project who starts at center on Sept. 13 right now is a really difficult exercise.

    John Palmieri @JPalmieri30
    Are the Rams currently trying to get an extension done with Janoris Jenkins? I think he is a must keep player.

    @nwagoner: Currently? I don’t know if that’s in the works at the moment but I do know the Rams have had some preliminary discussions with some players they’d like to keep around. Remember, they have a lot of unrestricted free agents after the season, so it stands to reason that if they have decided fully that they want to keep some of them, getting them done sooner than later would be a good thing. I believe they have interest in keeping Janoris Jenkins and wouldn’t be surprised if he was in the mix for a deal. I’ll be sure to check in on this further as we get into camp.

    derrick costoplos @costoplos
    I really thought Mason was the future,but it’s looking like a Lendale White/CJ combo thing now with Gurley.true?

    @nwagoner: I don’t think it plays out that way. Tre Mason will get his opportunities, and certainly more than his share, until Todd Gurley is healthy. But when Gurley is at full speed, he’s going to be the primary guy. The Rams view him as their Adrian Peterson or Marshawn Lynch. Jeff Fisher even acknowledged he could be his new Eddie George. In other words, the Rams didn’t draft him to be part of an elaborate timeshare. He’ll be the focal point of the offense sooner than later.

    Cody Zick @zick823
    Do you think Andrew Donnal or Jamon Brown will win a starting spot on the O-line?

    @nwagoner: Well, Jamon Brown was already working with the first team at right guard in the spring and the Rams seem pleased with his progress. I suppose things could change, but he seems to be in a really good spot when it comes to winning that job. Andrew Donnal is probably going to settle into a backup spot.

    Gerald S. Reynolds @ranchghost_g
    How can the team seriously compete with that offensive line?

    @nwagoner: Well, I suppose one could argue that simply making some changes will make the line better than it was last season. Despite their line woes a year ago, the Rams were competitive. But I also am assuming you mean can they contend rather than compete? We know the Rams will compete and be in the majority of their games. To me, the offensive line is the single biggest question of any position group on the team. That’s not breaking any new ground, but it’s certainly the case. How do two rookies fare? Who starts at center? Can Greg Robinson elevate his game? Can Rodger Saffold stay healthy? That’s a lot of questions to answer. I fully expect there to be plenty of growing pains for that group, but if it can prove capable of at least getting the job done in the run game and not be a total sieve pass blocking, the Rams will have a fighting chance. Still, it’s probably going to be a constant work in progress for most of the season, and it’s fair to wonder if it will be good enough for the Rams to actually contend for a playoff spot.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cherry pick comeback wins if you like but that doesn’t change what I’ve watched over the last two years. Seattle defense without Wilson at QB doesn’t win the NFC.

    But I think there are more than a dozen qbs who would have the same results in Phil. Maybe even better. By way of comparison, Warner has fewer crucial comeback wins in his career because he sometimes had defenses that could not keep the other team from counter-scoring. Wilson does have that.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Nick Foles couldn’t handle pressure from Eagles’ fans; can Sam Bradford?

    http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/07/nick_foles_couldnt_handle_pressure_from_eagles_fan_1.html

    It’s no secret that the Eagles are looking for a franchise quarterback.

    At times, Nick Foles looked to be that guy, as he led the Eagles to the 2013 NFC East championship, and went 15-10 in two seasons with head coach Chip Kelly.

    Off the field, however, it appears that Foles might not have been ready for the spotlight of Philadelphia — and that could be why he is in St. Louis.

    Speaking on 97.5 the Fanatic (via Birds 24/7) Philadelphia Inquirer’s Jeff McLane had this to say about Foles, and his ability to handle the pressure of being “the guy” in Philadelphia.

    “Nick, I think, wasn’t very comfortable in that role [of a franchise quarterback], especially in Philadelphia,” he said. “I think there probably wasn’t as much written about that [as there should’ve been] and I’ve kind of learned a few things since Nick has been gone, that it had really gotten to him, some of the criticism that was happening here in Philadelphia based on his play last season and I don’t think Bradford is the type of guy where he lets that type of stuff get to him.”

    McLane isn’t the only one to recently point out Foles’ off-the-field problems with the spotlight.

    Here is what Louis Riddick, a former member of the Eagles’ front office, had to say about Foles in an interview on 97.5 The Fanatic:

    “My experience with Nick is that he was very even-keel, very mellow, very much so not affected by a lot of outside things, but more…I’ve talked with people directly that were with him every day and coached him, and he was the kind of guy who behind the scenes didn’t necessarily like being criticized, didn’t necessarily like maybe being coached hard, being gotten on in the way that some quarterbacks and some players can take. So is it surprising that maybe he would fit in a little bit better in a town like St. Louis where, not necessarily that they don’t have high expectations, but it’s not the same kind of scrutiny he’ll face here in Philadelphia? Yeah, that doesn’t shock me. That doesn’t shock me that he would feel more comfortable there.”

    Whether Foles truly was able to handle the spotlight is, at this point, almost irrelevant.

    The question is, can Bradford?

    As Bradford will find out, the pressure to preform in Philadelphia will be far more intense than it was in St. Louis. Even as the former No. 1 overall pick, Bradford will face more pressure than he ever has in his career this season.

    If he doesn’t live up to the expectations of Eagles’ fans, Bradford will certainly hear it.

    And if he can’t handle it, he could find himself in a similar situation to Foles this time next year — out of Philadelphia.

    —–

    Eagles players said Nick Foles let criticism negatively impact him

    http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2015/7/22/9014687/eagles-players-nick-foles-quarterback-rams-quarterback-criticism-impact-philadelphia

    Nick Foles is a tough quarterback. His gritty performance against the Washington Redskins in Week 3 last season is a reminder of this fact. But maybe his mental toughness doesn’t match his physical toughness.

    At least, that’s what Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer seemed to suggest during a radio appearance with Anthony Gargano and Jon Marks on 97.5 The Fanatic on Wednesday morning. Transcription via Crossing Broad, bold emphasis is mine:

    “Nick wasn’t really comfortable in that [franchise QB] role. And I think there wasn’t much written about that and we’ve learned more about that since Nick has been gone … It really got to him, some of the criticism here in Philadelphia about his play last year. I heard from a couple of players that he’d get down … I understood that he’d let it get to him. I think that had to do with the decision to part with him … they felt like Nick wasn’t the guy for this team and this city.”

    Interesting. I hardly think Foles being negatively impacted by criticism was the deciding factor why the Eagles moved on from him, but it could have contributed to the decision. The main reason Foles is gone, I’d argue, is because Chip Kelly felt he was a limited talent and Sam Bradford offers a bigger upside.

    The concept of an athlete “not being able to handle Philadelphia because it’s tough” definitely isn’t new. There are plenty examples of this in the past. I remember people saying similar things about Flyers goalie Ilya Bryzgalov after he was ran out of town. There are other examples that don’t immediately come to mind. Personally, I don’t put a lot of stock into it. I think the real issue is a lack of talent more than anything.

    in reply to: the Philly/Bradford side of the trade story #27610
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Sam Bradford Injury: Updates on Eagles QB’s Recovery from Torn ACL

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2528413-sam-bradford-injury-updates-on-eagles-qbs-recovery-from-torn-acl

    Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Sam Bradford hasn’t played in a regular-season NFL game since October 2013, but the former No. 1 overall pick is seemingly on pace to end that lengthy drought.

    The Eagles took a chance on Bradford when they acquired him in a trade with the St. Louis Rams, as he tore his ACL for the second consecutive year last preseason, but the team is confident in his recovery and status for training camp.

    While the 27-year-old signal-caller wasn’t able to partake fully in organized team activities, Eliot Shorr-Parks of NJ.com is hearing from a source that he will indeed be ready to go full-bore in 11-on-11 drills when training camp opens Aug. 2.

    http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/07/sam_bradford_should_be_ready_for_eagles_training_c.html

    According to a person familiar with the situation who requested anonymity, Bradford is “looking great”, has been in the rehab room close to every day this summer, and should be ready to go when training camp opens.

    That means Bradford should be out on the field for 11-on-11 drills for the start of training cam

    This report comes on the heels of Bradford expressing confidence that he would be far enough along in his recovery to assume his spot as the starting quarterback during training camp, per Shorr-Parks.

    “If I’m not ready for 11-on-11 by training camp, then something has gone horribly wrong,” Bradford said. “That’s the plan right now. We’re going to keep plugging away and be ready when camp starts.”

    Tim McManus of PhillyMag.com reported the Eagles’ investigation while providing a reassuring statement from Eagles head coach Chip Kelly:

    http://www.phillymag.com/birds247/2015/07/26/with-sam-bradford-chip-kelly-believes-odds-are-in-his-favor/

    We looked at everything, and we knew we weren’t going to pick No. 1 or No. 2. So, and I’ve said it before, if you’re not going to pick one or two, how do you go get a quarterback?” said Kelly, explaining the thought process heading into this offseason. “Peyton Manning switched teams because of an injury. Drew Brees switched teams because of an injury. So we went down that path.”

    When it came to Bradford, the Eagles doctors consulted with the St. Louis trainers and the those that performed the surgery. The word they received was that the 27-year-old, coming off the second tear of his left ACL in less than a year’s time, “was fine” and “was progressing.” Further, there was no cartilage issues in the knee. On both occasions, it was just the ACL that was damaged.

    The Eagles did their own independent research as well and reached the conclusion that when it comes to ACLs, there is a 10-to-12 percent chance of re-injury.

    Back in May we spoke with Dr. James L. Carey, Director of the Penn Center for Advanced Cartilage Repair and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He cited studies that show the probability of re-tearing a reconstructed ACL is about three to six percent. (Those studies were on the general population, not just football players.)

    Meanwhile, the chances of tearing the other knee — or the “native ACL” — is higher, around nine to 12 percent — closer to the figures that Kelly used.
    Sponsored Content

    Either way, the stats show that there is a pretty good chance that history won’t repeat. The idea was to take a shot on a QB with upside who probably wouldn’t be available if not for the injury history, and hope he ascends to the level of the elite. The Brees example is one that Kelly referred to on multiple occasions, like when he was asked about the possibility of Bradford being skittish in the pocket given what he’s gone through over the past two seasons.

    Bradford’s impending return is huge for the Eagles since it means the likes of Mark Sanchez, Matt Barkley and Tim Tebow won’t have to take starting reps, but it’s even bigger for Bradford’s future.

    According to NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport, the former University of Oklahoma standout has opted against signing an extension with the Eagles prior to the season:

    Ian Rapoport@RapSheet

    For Sam Bradford, not signing an extension now may allow him to maximize his value. He takes that over more security long-term

    He is essentially gambling on himself, and the notion that he’ll be ready for training camp means the first roll of the dice is about to go his way.

    Bradford will also have to prove that he can go through the preseason, regular season and perhaps even the playoffs without suffering another catastrophic injury, which is something he has been unable to avoid over the past two years.

    If he can stay healthy and integrate himself into an offense anchored by running back DeMarco Murray, though, he stands to land a nice payday when the 2015 campaign reaches its conclusion.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Seahawks have Wilson at QB and Lynch at RB to extend drives. Their defense is incapable of winning without a well functioning offense.

    Fwiw we just differ on that. To me, it’s that Wilson has Lynch and that defense.

    Wilson keeps those drives alive more so than Lynch. That defense without Wilson leading the offense does not win the NFC.

    Well in terms of third down conversions passing, Wilson/Seattle is actually 26th in the league, so I don’t know about that. (That’s conversion percentages.)

    In terms of third down conversions rushing, Wilson is 31st in the league (again, percentages).

    In terms of his comebacks, if you look at them, most of the time Seattle’s score leaves time on the clock for the other team to take the win back, but the D holds.

    Just looking at 2014…blue = Wilson is a major factor, red = defense is the major factor in preserving a win.
    Against Denver, it was overtime. Denver ties it in the 4th, and Seattle got the ball first in overtime. Lynch scores.
    Good short passing game helps get them down the field.

    Against Carolina, close game and Carolina had the ball last with 0.42 to go. But this one is on Wilson.

    ]Against the Giants, it was tied at the end of the 3rd. In the 4th, the first Seattle score in the 4th leading to a blowout comes after an INT. Michael/Turbin/Lynch dominate running on the go-ahead drive, Wilson is 0 for 1 on the drive but has one run for 11. End result, Seattle 38-17.Seattle scores three times and the Giants can do nothing.

    Against St. Louis, same thing. Tied at the end of the third. Seattle scores twice, Rams do nothing against that defense. In the go-ahead drive at the top of the 4th, Wilson sets up a score hitting Norwood for 31. Cunningham fumbles one drive, Rams INT for 6 on another, Rams turn it over on downs on another.

    Green Bay. Playoffs. Green Bay ties it, after several aborted efforts. Seattle gets the ball first in overtime. Wilson throws the 35 yarder to Kearse.

    That’s just 2014. It’s clear from that Wilson contributes a lot to a team that is built to dominate in the 4th, but in 3 of the games the defense aggressively defends those leads, which are not late 4th quarter type comeback wins.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Seahawks have Wilson at QB and Lynch at RB to extend drives. Their defense is incapable of winning without a well functioning offense.

    Fwiw we just differ on that. To me, it’s that Wilson has Lynch and that defense.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from off the net

    ==

    NotaKellyfan (Eagles fan)

    All I am attempting to do is add context for those of you that did not see Foles play.

    Chip Kelly never wanted Foles as his QB. He made a big deal of talking about how he didn’t need particular types of players, but he went out of his way to show otherwise. He gave the job to Vick, who struggled. Kelly never put him in front of Vick. Kelly chose Vick and only put Foles in when Vick inevitably got hurt. Foles came in the second half of the Giants game in 2013 and led the team to its second victory. Foles then lit up the BUCs scoring 4 TDs (one rushing) and Chip wouldn’t commit. Foles then got concussed and had a horrid game against the Cowboys. Vick came back and got hurt again against the Giants, giving Kelly no choice but to play him. Foles then threw 7 TDS and made it impossible to bench him.

    My point being, I don’t believe Kelly ever wanted Foles as his guy and he was pretty much forced into it. It is true that Foles started over Sanchez, but I don’t think Foles left him much of a choice.

    Last year, Foles struggled but it was not solely his fault. Foles was playing behind a makeshift line for much of his time. Lane Johnson was suspended for the first four games. So the Eagles swung Todd Herremans out of his RG spot to RT. Evan Mathis, the LG, went down with an injury in week one. Jason Kelce, the starting Center, went down with an injury in week 3. The week 4 starting line, the week the Eagles played the 49ers, was Jason Peters at LT, Matt Tobin at LG, David Molk at C, Dennis Kelly at RG and Todd Herremans at RT. Like Foles, Herremans got hurt against the Texans. Kelce came back the week prior and Mathis came back for Sanchez’s first start. Sanchez had the benefit of 4/5ths of the line for his entire tenure.

    I truly believe he was more injured than they revealed in the Washington game. I think that may have also led to Foles’ having some mistrust in the OL.

    Lesean McCoy struggled mightily at certain points giving less than 20 rushing yards in two different games. Teams were rushing four guys and dropping into coverage because they were facing three, or in some cases, four backup linemen and able to get pressure.

    Another difference between 2014 and 2013 was the change in QB coach. The new coach emphasized getting the ball out quickly and not taking sacks, Foles had taken 28 sacks in 10.5 games in 2013. Foles actually did very well avoiding sacks after the first half of the first game, he had taken five sacks and turned it over three times in that half. He took only 4 sacks in the next 6.75 games, but had 10 turnovers in that span.

    Also, Foles’ 2014 numbers look worse thanks in large part to a game and a half of bad football against the 49ers, a week after being injured against Washington, and the first half against the Jaguars. Foles’ was 32/64 for 331 yards, 3 INTs, 2 fumbles, 6 sacks and a 45.8 QB rating in that stretch. In Foles other games he took only three sacks despite heavy pressure and was 154/247 for 1,832 yards, 13 TDs, 7 INTs, 1 fumble and 90.7 QB Rating. The team was also averaging 33 points per game with him in those games.

    Of course it would be illogical to pretend those six quarters never happened as they did, but it should come as some comfort that he wasn’t mediocre all year. He simply had a bad stretch which made his season mediocre.

    His deep accuracy was a struggle last year, but that was partially because of a lack of chemistry with his WRs. Maclin was hurt for much of training camp and Kelly had Matthews working with the backups instead of Foles. Meanwhile Riley Cooper’s play dropped off a cliff and the line issues factored in as well. That said, I don’t think many questioned his accuracy either.

    His decision making was questionable last season, but again I think the offensive line should be considered. The injury probably factored in a little bit too.

    I am not trying to excuse all of Foles’ problems last year. He did have struggles. Several of his interceptions left me surprised and the fumble against the Rams had me highly irritated. Foles did fall into a phantom pressure mode after the first month or so. He would fade backwards to avoid pressure and end up rushing a throw, which IMO came from the new QB coach attempting to force quicker decisions. I have said before I believe the phantom pressure may have had something to do with the late hit against the Redskins where I believe he was actually hurt.

    Foles’ release is slower than Bradford’s. That was a definite question mark. It’s also fair game to question his deep accuracy though I would again point to the circumstances.

    But all told, The Eagles were in every game with Foles even the 49ers game where he did not play well in the least. He kept the team within reach and threw what could have been a gamewinning TD if Riley Cooper had hung onto the ball. Against the Cardinals Foles threw a last second pass into the endzone which would have won the game, but Jordan Matthews could not stay in bounds.

    I think he is legitimately capable of being a top ten QB and he should improve your team. I was honestly expecting Andy Reid to make another attempt at trading for him.

    in reply to: Rare whale washes ashore on Plymouth, MA beach. #27594
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This undated photo provided by the New England Aquarium shows the carcass of rarely-seen deep water beaked whale that washed ashore on Jones Beach in Plymouth, Mass. Aquarium biologists and staff from the International Fund for Animal Welfare are performing a necrospy at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on the carcass after it was found Friday, July 24, 2015. (New England Aquarium via AP)

    Beaked whale
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Beaked whales are the members of the family Ziphiidae which consists of 22 species. These toothed whales are notable for their elongated beaks. Among air-breathing animals, beaked whales are some of the most extreme divers: Cuvier’s beaked whales regularly dive for an hour at a depth over 1,000 m (3,300 ft),[1] and the longest and deepest foraging dive recorded is 137.5 minutes and 2,992 m (9,816 ft). This is the greatest dive-depth known for a mammal.[2]

    Beaked whales are one of the least known groups of mammals because of their deep-sea habitat, mysterious habits, and apparent low abundance.[3] Only three to four of the 22 species are reasonably well-known. Baird’s and Cuvier’s beaked whales were subject to commercial exploitation, off the coast of Japan, while the northern bottlenose whale was extensively hunted in the northern part of the North Atlantic late in the 19th and early in the 20th centuries.

    Diving

    Beaked whales are deep divers with extreme dive profiles.[1] They regularly dive deeper than 500 m (1,600 ft) to echolocate for food, and these deep dives are often followed by multiple shallower dives of less than 500 m.[11] This pattern is not always followed however. Animals have been observed spending more than an hour at or near the surface breathing. Beaked whales are often seen surfacing synchronously, but asynchronous surfacing has also been observed.[12]

    Deep-diving mammals face a number of challenges related to extended breath holding and hydrostatic pressure. Cetaceans and pinnipeds that prolong apnea must optimize the size and use of their oxygen stores, and they must deal with the accumulation of lactic acid due to anaerobic metabolism.[1] Beaked whales have several anatomical adaptations to deep diving: large spleens, livers, and body shape. Most cetaceans have small spleens. However, beaked whales have much larger spleens than delphinids, and may have larger livers as well. These anatomical traits, which are important for filtering blood, could be adaptations to deep diving. Another notable anatomical adaptation among beaked whales is a slight depression in the body wall that allows them to hold their pectoral flippers tightly against their bodies for increased streamlining.[5]

    The challenges of deep diving are also overcome by the unique diving physiology of beaked whales. Oxygen storage during dives is mostly achieved by blood hemoglobin and muscle myoglobin.[11] While the whale is diving, its heart rate slows and blood flow changes. This physiological dive response ensures oxygen-sensitive tissues maintain a supply of oxygen, while those tissues tolerant to hypoxia receive less blood flow. Additionally, lung collapse obviates the exchange of lung gas with blood, likely minimizing the uptake of nitrogen by tissues.[5]

    Feeding

    The throats of all beaked whales have a bilaterally paired set of grooves that are associated with their unique feeding mechanism, suction feeding.[5] Instead of capturing prey with their teeth, beaked whales suck it into their oral cavity. Suction is aided by the throat grooves, which stretch and expand to accommodate food. Their tongue can move very freely. By suddenly retracting the tongue and distending the gular (throat) floor, pressure immediately drops within the mouth sucking the prey in with the water.

    Dietary information is available from stomach contents analyses of stranded beaked whales and from whaling operations. Their preferred diet is primarily deep-water squid,[7] but also benthic and benthopelagic fish and some crustaceans, mostly taken near the sea floor.[12] In a recent study, gouge marks in the seafloor were interpreted to be a result of feeding activities by beaked whales.[13]

    To understand the hunting and foraging behavior of beaked whales, researchers used sound and orientation recording devices (DTAGs) on two species: Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris) and Blainville’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris). These whales hunt by echolocation in deep water (where the majority of their prey is located) between approximately 200–1,885 m (656–6,184 ft) and usually catch about 30 prey per dive. Cuvier’s beaked whale must forage on average at 1,070 m (3,510 ft) for 58 minutes and Blainville’s beaked whales typically forage at 835 m (2,740 ft) deep for an average of 47 minutes.[1]

    Range and habitat

    The family Ziphiidae is one of the most widespread families of cetaceans, ranging from the ice edges at both the north and south poles, to the equator in all the oceans.[14] Specific ranges vary greatly by species, though beaked whales typically inhabit offshore waters that are at least 300 meters deep.

    Beaked whales are known to congregate in deep waters off the edge of continental shelves, and bottom features, such as seamounts, canyons, escarpments, and oceanic islands, including the Azores and the Canary Islands.[12]

    Life history

    Very little is known about the life histories of beaked whales. The oldest one ever recorded was 84 years for a male Baird’s beaked whale, and the oldest recorded female Baird’s beaked whale is 54 years. For all other beaked whale species studied, the highest recorded age is between 27 and 39 years. Sexual maturity is reached between seven and 15 years of age in Baird’s beaked whales and northern bottlenose whales. Gestation varies greatly between species, lasting 17 months for Baird’s beaked whales and 12 months for the northern bottlenose whale.[15] There are currently no data available on their reproductive rates.

    It is difficult to determine group size of beaked whales, due to their inconspicuous surfacing behavior. Groups of beaked whales, defined as all individuals found in the same location at the same time, have been reported as ranging from one to 100 individuals. Nevertheless, some populations’ group size has been estimated from repeated observations. For example, northern and southern bottlenose whales (H. ampullatus and H. planifrons), Cuvier’s beaked whales and Blainville’s beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) have a reported maximum group size of 20 individuals, with the average ranging from 2.5 to 3.5 individuals. Berardius species and Longman’s beaked whales (Indopacetus pacificus) are found in larger groups of up to 100 individuals.[12]

    Not much information is available about group composition of beaked whales. Only three species have been studied in any detail: northern bottlenose whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, and Baird’s beaked whales. Female northern bottlenose whales appear to form a loose network of social partners with no obvious long-term associations. In contrast to females, some male northern bottlenose whales have been repeatedly recorded together over several years, and possibly form long-term associations. Studies of Blainville’s beaked whales have revealed groups usually consist of a number of females, calves and/or juvenile animals. These whales are assumed to live in “harem-like” groups, where several females and young are accompanied by a single male.[7] Baird’s beaked whales are known to occur in multiple male groups, and in large groups consisting of adult animals of both sexes.
    Conservation

    For many years, most beaked whale species were insulated from anthropogenic impacts because of their remote habitat. However, there are now several issues of concern:

    Studies of stranded beaked whales show rising levels of toxic chemicals in their blubber.[16]
    As a top predator, beaked whales, like raptors, are particularly vulnerable to build-up of biocontaminants. They frequently ingest plastic bags (which do not break down and can be lethal).[12]
    They more frequently become trapped in trawl nets, due to the expansion of deepwater fisheries.[17]

    Decompression sickness

    A major conservation concern for beaked whales (family Ziphiidae) is they appear to be vulnerable to modern sonar operations, which arises from recent strandings that temporally and physically coincide with naval sonar exercises.[18] Postmortem examinations of the stranded whales in concurrence with naval exercises have reported the presence of hemorrhaging near the ears or gas and fat emboli, which could have a deleterious impact on beaked whales that is analogous to decompression sickness in humans.[11] Gas and fat emboli have been shown to cause nervous and cardiovascular system dysfunction, respiratory distress, pain, and disorientation in both humans and animals.[18] In the inner ear, gas embolism can cause hemorrhages, leading to disorientation or vestibular dysfunction.

    Breath-holding divers, like beaked whales, can develop decompression-related problems (the “bends”) when they return to the surface after deep dives.[1] This is a possible hypothesis for the mass strandings of pelagic beaked whales associated with sonar-related activities. To illustrate, a diving beaked whale may be surfacing from a deep dive and must pass vertically through varying received sound levels. Since the whale has limited remaining oxygen supplies at the end of a long dive, it probably has limited abilities to display any normal sound avoidance behavior. Instead, the whale must continue to swim towards the surface to replenish its oxygen stores.[12] Avoiding sonar inevitably requires a change in behavior or surfacing pattern. Therefore, sonar in close proximity to groups of beaked whales has the potential to cause hemorrhaging or to disorient the animal, eventually leading to a stranding.

    Current research reveals two species of beaked whales are most affected by sonar: Cuvier’s beaked whales (Z. cavirostris) and Blainville’s (M. densirostris) beaked whales. These animals have been reported as stranding in correlation with military exercises in Greece, the Bahamas, Madeira, and the Canary Islands.[19] The livers of these animals had the most damage.[20]

    Though some evidence indicates sonar-related activities can actually lead to a form of decompression sickness in beaked whales, the topic is still up for debate. A significant limiting factor in determining the likelihood of bubble formation in whale tissues and the risk of decompression sickness is the lack of information on their normal diving and surfacing patterns.[1] More research is necessary to determine the extent of whale tissue damage caused by sonar exercises.

    Four species are classified by the IUCN as “lower risk, conservation dependent”: Arnoux’s and Baird’s beaked whales, and the northern and southern bottlenose whales. The status of the remaining species is unknown, preventing classification.[21]

    in reply to: Rare whale washes ashore on Plymouth, MA beach. #27593
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This undated photo provided by the New England Aquarium shows the carcass of rarely-seen deep water beaked whale that washed ashore on Jones Beach in Plymouth, Mass. Aquarium biologists and staff from the International Fund for Animal Welfare are performing a necrospy at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on the carcass after it was found Friday, July 24, 2015. (New England Aquarium via AP)

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/photos/9/9e54f5ad-2ec3-402d-affb-b8cc84d7f424.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Bernie: Foles could be the answer for Rams — or not

    By Bernie Miklasz

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bernie-miklasz/bernie-foles-could-be-the-answer-for-rams-or-not/article_6c7c730a-3af6-5cf3-beeb-a2ecfef03075.html

    Here’s one of the worst things about the constant huffing and puffing over the Rams, St. Louis, Stan Kroenke, Los Angeles, Gov. Nixon, the Edward Jones Dome, the STL stadium task force, NFL relocation guidelines, the proposed stadium on the north riverfront, Peacock & Blitz, Roger Goodell, the San Diego Chargers, the Oakland Raiders, Carson, and Inglewood (always up to no good) …

    I don’t talk about Rams football anymore.

    You know: the game on the field.

    Not the game of Monopoly.

    I’ve been so hopelessly distracted by STL vs. LA and the Battle for Los Angeles, I’ve struggled to keep up with the football stuff.

    So let’s talk about the Rams’ 2015 training camp, shall we?

    Hey, I know you’ve heard me say this before, but I’m confident this is the year that quarterback Sam Bradford finally puts it all together for the Rams.

    The Rams just needed to surround Bradford with more talent. And the free-agent signing of left offensive tackle Jake Long should keep Bradford upright and healthy.

    Plus, this will be Bradford’s fourth season working with offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer, and the continuity will make a positive difference.

    Know what I mean?

    What’s that?

    Bradford was traded to Philadelphia for quarterback Nick Foles, and “Schotty” no longer works for the Rams? Jake Long was released in a salary-cap move?

    Oh.

    Let’s talk about Foles, then. I’ll stop kidding around.

    On a serious note, the Rams open camp Friday. And there’s so much to keep an eye on this summer, including the surgically repaired left knee of rookie running back Todd Gurley. And watch out for that herd of mammoth rookie offensive linemen.

    But Foles is the most intriguing player in camp.

    Since the Rams’ last winning season (2003), they’ve used 14 starting quarterbacks: Marc Bulger, Bradford, Kellen Clemens, Austin Davis, Shaun Hill, Jamie Martin, Chris Chandler, Kyle Boller, Keith Null, A.J. Feeley, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Gus Frerotte, Brock Berlin and Trent Green.

    Foles is next in line.

    What will become of him?

    Eligible to become an unrestricted free agent after the season, Foles could be passing through town, one and done. Or he could take the job, own it, and provide the long-term stability that’s been missing since Bulger started 80 of a possible 96 regular-season games between 2002 and 2008.

    No doubt, the constant churn at a critically important position is a factor in the Rams’ .327 winning percentage over the past 11 seasons.

    With many NFL franchises, the big quarterback question at this time of the year pertains to quality: Can the talented QB lead the team to the playoffs and win a Super Bowl?

    In St. Louis, with so many quarterback injuries, benchings, recycling jobs and coaching changes, the key question is much different: Do the Rams even have a QB?

    In evaluating Foles, you can pretty much see what you want to see.

    Hey, this is the quarterback who threw 27 touchdown passes and only two interceptions for Philadelphia in 2013. Foles was voted to the Pro Bowl, the dazzling Eagles averaged 28 points per game, went 10-6, and made the NFC playoffs.

    Wow, 27 touchdowns and two pickoffs? And average of 9.1 yards per passing attempt? A passer rating of 119.2? When Kurt Warner was the pride of St. Louis, orchestrating the Greatest Show on Turf, he never had a passer rating higher than 109.2 in a season. Foles is no Warner, but he could be the best quarterback here since Bulger went to the Pro Bowl after passing for 4,301 yards in 2006.

    No, no, no. Foles is a one-year wonder who crashed in 2014. Foles passed for only 13 touchdowns, lobbed too many interceptions (10), held the ball too long, took too many hits, suffered a fractured collarbone, and was abruptly cast aside by Eagles coach Chip Kelly.

    Given Kelly’s obsession with offense, and his quarterback-friendly attack, why did he give up on Foles so quickly? What does that tell us? Not only that, but Kelly flipped Foles to St. Louis to gamble on Bradford. Yeah, the iron-man Bradford that missed 25 of the Rams’ previous 32 games because of two knee surgeries.

    Hold on, now. Why the negativity? Foles made a great impression right away. His new teammates rave about him. The Rams have embraced Nick as the leader they’ve been waiting for.

    “The chemistry has been great since day one,” wide receiver Kenny Britt told reporters. “He’s the guy that comes in the locker room and pumps people up ready to go. If you’re down, he’s the first one (saying) ‘Hey come on, we’ve gotta go right now.’ To tell you the truth, it’s kind of exciting to see him in there.”

    Tight end Jared Cook co-signed the endorsement. “I’m so glad that he’s here. I love that he’s here,” Cook told the team’s web site. “I love what he brings to us, and I love the fact that he’s just an up-tempo, positive guy.”

    Love was definitely in the air at Rams Park.

    “Great deep ball,” Britt said. “He puts it on the money every time. He can throw every pass in the book.”

    That’s nice.

    As you might imagine, the opinions in Philadelphia aren’t so nice.

    In a recent interview with a Philadelphia radio station, former Eagles scout Louis Riddick described an alternative version of Foles.

    “I’ve talked with people directly that were with him every day and coached him, and he was the kind of guy who behind the scenes didn’t necessarily like being criticized, didn’t necessarily like maybe being coached hard, being gotten on in the way that some quarterbacks and some players can take,” Riddick said.

    “So is it surprising that maybe he would fit in a little bit better in a town like St. Louis where, not necessarily that they don’t have high expectations, but it’s not the same kind of scrutiny he’ll face here in Philadelphia? Yeah, that doesn’t shock me. That doesn’t shock me that he would feel more comfortable there.”

    Speaking to ESPN’s Mike Sando, one anonymous NFL head coach said he’d be delighted to have Foles … at No. 2 on the depth chart.

    “You wish he was your backup because he could go win some games for you,” the coach said. “But I wouldn’t want him to be my starter.”

    This is confusing, yes?

    Foles is either (1) a natural-born leader of men who puts every throw on the money; or (2) he’s thin-skinned, can’t take the heat, couldn’t wait to duck behind the low expectations in St. Louis and is no better than a good backup.

    I’m neutral for now. I like Foles’ potential, but he could go either way.

    Foles could be the answer, the solution, the missing piece. Or he could go missing, like the many Rams quarterbacks that have come and gone.

    in reply to: 11 American nations #27585
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’m in the heart of Greater-Appalachia.
    According to the algebra, we are the
    Unhappiest, Unhealthiest, most Paranoid
    citizens of this great, red, white and blue,
    Mega-Theo-Military-Industrial-Unsustainable-biosphere-killing-Corporotacracy-Thingy.

    w
    v

    I think that whole map just manifests a secret American fantasy to appropriate Canada and Mexico.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Nick Foles at No. 22 in league insiders’ quarterback rankings

    Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/19658/nick-foles-at-no-22-in-league-insiders-quarterback-rankings

    EARTH CITY, Mo. — In what has become an annual project for ESPN NFL Insider Mike Sando, he’s once again surveyed 35 NFL personnel evaluators and coaches in an effort to properly rank the league’s quarterbacks.

    Sando asked the panel to offer a score between one and five for each player with a “one” defined as a signal caller capable of carrying a team from week to week to contender status. A “five” is reserved for the worst but generally not used for starting quarterbacks in the league, even those at the bottom of the list.

    The St. Louis Rams changed quarterbacks this offseason, trading Sam Bradford to the Philadelphia Eagles for Nick Foles and draft pick consideration. According to the way the numbers came out in Sando’ survey, the Rams upgraded… barely. The rankings saw Foles come in at No. 22 on the list with an average rating of 3.2. Bradford checked in at No. 23 with an average rating of 3.23.

    Foles’ rating dropped from No. 15 last year when he was coming off a big 2013 season in which he threw 27 touchdowns and just two interceptions. But he was unable to duplicate that success in eight games last year before an injury ended his season early. That seems to be the primary reason for the drop off and Foles’ presence in the third “tier” among quarterbacks.

    As you’d expect, those doubting Foles question how he’ll fare outside the confines of Chip Kelly’s offense in Philadelphia. Likewise, those uncertain about Bradford wonder whether he can stay healthy.

    .

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Debating Russell Wilson’s place in QB Tier rankings

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insider/story/_/id/13305876/debating-russell-wilson-place-qb-tier-rankings-nfl

    Mike Sando, NFL Insider

    There’s a theory circulating among a few of the NFL personnel evaluators, coaches and agents I’ve spoken with about quarterbacks recently. It’s only a theory. The Seattle Seahawks could blow it out of the water by signing Russell Wilson to a monster contract. Until that happens, the theory will live in the minds of those who like Wilson’s game but do not love it.

    The theory, raised by some of the 35 coaches and evaluators who participated in our second annual Quarterback Tiers project, says the team could be reluctant to pay Wilson at the high end of the quarterback scale. Why? For a few reasons — reasons that made Wilson the most debated quarterback our survey. Some of those appear below.

    Eleven of the 35 voters placed Wilson in the highest of five tiers, but one thought he would not stay there because defenses would solve him, especially if Seattle’s own defense declined and running back Marshawn Lynch retired. Twenty-three other voters put Wilson in the second tier (some of those voters thought he would not ascend higher). A single voter placed Wilson in the third tier and did not waver during a cross-examination I witnessed at a social gathering featuring this Wilson skeptic and another coach.

    The debate begins with that conversation featuring a defensive coach, the Wilson skeptic (an offensive coordinator) and me. The debate continues with testimonials from voters who placed Wilson in the top two tiers, with and without conditions. It’s a look into the notes I kept when the quarterback conversation turned to Wilson this offseason.
    The Tier 3 rationale

    Sando: OK, so why is Russell Wilson a 3?

    Offensive coordinator: Because I think he needs Marshawn Lynch and the defense to do what he has done.

    Defensive coach: That’s not the way it really is because he is way better than you think coming from behind in the two-minute offense. They’ve been way behind and he’s rallied them back.

    REST OF THE ARTICLE IS ON ESPN INSIDER

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: the Philly/Bradford side of the trade story #27556
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    RamBill

    The first snap Bradford takes in a real game means the most the Rams would have to give back would be a 4th round pick. If he plays 50% of the snaps they owe the Eagles nothing.

Viewing 30 posts - 42,481 through 42,510 (of 47,024 total)