Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
znModeratorRams hope Welker can help move the chains
Jim Thomas
With his team converting third-down plays at a historically low rate, coach Jeff Fisher has a vision of how he hopes things unfold Sunday against visiting Chicago.
“If he does play and he converts the first down, they’ll probably start chanting ‘Welker’ rather than ‘Gurley,’ ” Fisher quipped.
If that’s the case, Todd Gurley says his feelings won’t be hurt.
“No, I’ll be chanting right there with them,” the Rams running back said, smiling.
Just the other day, Gurley and fellow Rams running back Benny Cunningham were shooting the breeze when Welker’s name came up.
“We were like, ‘Man, where’s Wes Welker at?’ ” Gurley recalled. “And then next thing you know, Chase (Reynolds) sent a text: ‘Hey, Wes Welker’s in here.’ ”
What ever happened to Wes Welker?
After spending half a season out of football, the veteran wide receiver has signed with the Rams. Fisher and everybody else at Rams Park hopes he can be the elixir to their ailing third-down offense.
Welker, who will wear jersey No. 19 and has taken over Danny Amendola’s old locker stall, shied away from calling himself the team’s third-down savior.
“I don’t see myself as being the solution to all of that, or anything like that,” he told reporters after Tuesday’s practice. “I’m just here trying to learn the offense, and trying to contribute any way I can.”
But as Fisher mentioned Monday in announcing the signing, Welker has made a career out of moving the chains, be it at Miami, New England, or most recently, Denver. Filling the roster spot created by Stedman Bailey’s four-game NFL drug suspension, Welker does have the skill set to improve on the Ram’s league-worst 23.8 percent conversion rate on third down (24 of 101).
“He’s going to get open, he’s going to make the catch, he’s going to get the first down,” Fisher said. “He’s going to get down, get up, and we’ll keep the chains moving. That’s kind of what we’re looking for.”
Fisher feels Welker’s presence on the field should only make Tavon Austin that much more effective.
“We all know if (Austin) gets the ball in his hands, he can go the distance,” Fisher said. “Now, you have another guy that you’ve got to contend with that’s going to get you the first down.”
Even with a veteran of 11 NFL seasons such as Welker, the question is when will he have enough of a grasp of the offense to take the field?
“Obviously, terminology is a little bit different,” Welker said. “But there’s a lot of similarities to some things that I’ve done in the past. I’m really just trying to get on the same page of how the coaches want me to do it here and everything like that.”
Welker already has spent extra time with Rams coaches as well as quarterback Nick Foles, taking a cram course on the playbook. Welker also spent extra time on the field with Foles following Tuesday’s practice. (Several other Rams receivers also stayed late.)
Even for a savvy vet such as Welker, there’s no way he can learn an entire offense in just one week. So part of the challenge for the Rams coaching staff, with input from Welker and Foles, is getting him familiar with enough plays to be game-ready in even a limited role.
“We package,” Fisher said. “We package things for most everybody. So we’ll have a package for him, and we’ll just see how comfortable he is.”
The passing game concepts are the same. After all, there are only so many types of passing routes you can run in football. It’s all about learning the language of this offense, as well as getting a basic chemistry established with Foles.
As of Tuesday, neither Fisher nor Welker was ready to say unequivocally that Welker would play against Chicago.
“I have no idea about that,” Welker said. “I still have a long ways to go and a lot of work to do and a lot of studying to do. We’ll see what Coach Fisher thinks at the end of the week.”
There are concerns, obviously, about Welker’s health considering his past concussion problems. And at age 34 — four years older than anyone else on the current Rams roster — Welker has some observers wondering if he still has the quickness and separation skills to be a factor.
Welker, who has been training in Florida, said he has no concerns concussion-wise about taking the field again.
“Not at all,” he said. “I’ve been cleared by the doctors and everything else. Obviously I’m not going to try and look for contact and everything like that, but I’m not thinking about it either.
“I’m out there playing hard and playing the way I need to play to be successful. You start second-guessing yourself out there and that’s when you get in trouble.”
As for his skill set, he made a good impression Tuesday on nickel back Lamarcus Joyner.
“From the looks of things today on the field, he still looks like he can move,” Joyner said. “He’s very quick. Very shifty. Same old Wes Welker you see on ESPN every Sunday from the past.”
With 890 career receptions, five 1,000-yard seasons, five Pro Bowls, and three Super Bowls to his credit, Welker had his new teammates’ respect from the moment he walked into the locker room.
“He has more knowledge than all of us have, because he’s been somewhere none of us has ever been in his career,” tight end Jared Cook said, referring to Welker’s Super Bowl experience. “So he definitely can teach us a lot of stuff. It’s just about if he wants to share, and then who wants to listen. But I’m all ears, I’ll tell you that.”
“It’s cool having a veteran here,” tight end Lance Kendricks added. “We haven’t had like an older guy, an older veteran I should say, come in in a while. It’s always good to have leadership, somebody who’s won championships, somebody who’s been there before who can teach.”
And somebody who can convert some third downs.
November 11, 2015 at 1:38 am in reply to: RamView, 11/8/2015: Vikings 21, Rams 18 (OT) (Long) #33934
znModeratorThe Rams were not likely to dominate the LOS this week. His receivers have been a problem a lot of the year but Foles missed some opportunities. This was never going to be a game the Rams would win with a game manager at QB. They needed Foles to be more.
What intrigues me that even with all that, they almost won it…and in fact for a lot of the game I thought they were going to win it.
Aren’t those a big set of problems to overcome? Yet they were in that game. It was a close tough game, when having that many problems on offense in the past (2007-2011) would mean that game would clearly be over long before the 4th quarter.
That fact is kind of interesting to me.
…
November 11, 2015 at 1:12 am in reply to: Jeff Fisher Press Conference – 11/9(16:44) – Video & transcript #33933
znModeratorObviously we disagree. I do not share your limitless patience with Fisher’s teams breaking down or your blithe conviction that they will be better given time. Our ideas of how much time is appropriate are pretty different.
I have no idea how much time is appropriate.
But I see their history this way. They did build a team that was going to turn the corner, and injuries to the qb and OL waylaid that. So in 2015 they started over with a new qb and a new OL. So I don’t see 2015 as year 4, I see it as a start-over on offense.
To me that’s just a realistic analysis. You obviously disagree.
Oh and I said nothing about your right to express yourself. In fact I said nothing about you expressing yourself at all, one way or another. I was talking about me expressing MYself, and how I view THAT. It had nothing to do with what you mistakenly took it to mean: Please stop lecturing me on how important it is to understand that other viewpoints are OK and that you virtuously recognize my right to express myself.
As usual I said and did no such thing. Ironically, I was trying to cue you that my intentions were not negative…. Anyway ironically you took me saying that as doing what I was trying to tell you I don’t do.
Now I have to speak directly as a mod. These kinds of exchanges either stop or I up the ante and go directly to mod options, like locked threads or if need be, deletes. The board doesn’t allow personal antagonisms, and I can’t be fair to everyone else and allow them to continue with you. If you don’t like what I say (and invariably I am baffled at how you take some things), either email me and straighten it out, or just don’t say anything. If saying that damages our friendship, which is far from what I want, I am just going to have to take that hit. I promise not to respond to your posts at all anymore, since it seems to lead to this kind of thing. You have no idea how much I regret having to say that. Oh, and, if there is any response to this post, please stick to football…any continuation of this personal stuff will be treated the way the rules say I have to treat it. So “the end” on that kind of thing in our exchanges. Thanks.
.
znModeratorAdrian Peterson doesn’t believe hit on Teddy Bridgewater was dirty
Mike Florio
Plenty of people believe the hit applied by Rams cornerback Lamarcus Joyner on Vikings quarterback Teddy Bridgewater was dirty. Vikings running back Adrian Peterson isn’t among those who do.
“Initial reaction, I actually just took off sprinting over there towards the Rams players because you know I seen it and it looked bad,” Peterson said on Monday’s PFT Live on NBC Sports Radio. “It looked dirty, but as I was over there kind of in the midst of those guys I wanted to watch the replay before I reacted and I do anything crazy but, you know, that is our guy. It appeared dirty but watching the replay I honestly feel, my opinion, that he didn’t target him. If he was targeting him he did a bad job of executing.
“I feel like it was a bang-bang play. Teddy slid; unfortunately his head came up. If his head’s flat, I think the guy’s shoulder misses but that’s not normally how a quarterbacks’s head is when he’s sliding. . . . It was still, though, you see the quarterback approaching you so you should you know he’s going to slide. You see him in his slide formation. You should just do a run by anyway and not put yourself in that position, but unfortunately for him he did, and it was upsetting to say the least.”
Peterson said he understands the concerns about the situation, given the history of Rams defensive coordinator Gregg Williams. But Peterson prefers to view the situation as not calculated, not deliberate.
“Personally, you know, I like to see the best of people so I would say that wasn’t targeting based on me evaluating it with my eyes and really kind of making a sound judgement on it. It still wasn’t a smart play, and our quarterback was out for the rest of the game so that hurt us and it was a tough one. It was real close so I can see why opinions would sway to be it being intentional.”
For the full interview with Peterson, who addressed plenty of topics for a solid 10 minutes or more, click the thing in the thing below.
znModeratorMike Zimmer and Rodney Harrison: Hypocrisy Exposed
Bernie Miklasz
http://www.101sports.com/2015/11/10/247281/
If any of you have graciously taken the time to read some of my work over the past few years, you’ll know that I haven’t held back in scrutinizing / criticizing Rams head coach Jeff Fisher and team defensive coordinator Gregg Williams on the subject of penalties.
I’ve written multiple pieces on the topic, and repeatedly cited statistics about the number of personal fouls and roughing-the-passer penalties called against Fisher-Williams defenses. Their teams play with an edge, push the boundaries and have crossed the line at times.
This isn’t always the case; in some coaching seasons Fisher and/or Williams had relatively low penalty counts on the rough-stuff penalties. But yeah, the coach and his DC encourage aggression. And it isn’t always easy to control aggression.
Over a 10-season period (2001-2010) in Tennessee, Fisher’s defense had at least 10 personal fouls in all 10 seasons. And in seven of those years the Titans finished among the top 5 in the NFL for most personal fouls. In six of those seasons the Titans were in the top 5 for most roughing penalties. The Titans had the league’s highest roughing-the-passer count for three consecutive seasons (2007-2009) and committed the most personal fouls in a season on three different occasions.
Williams ran the Fisher defense in Tennessee between 1997 and 2000, then moved on to become head coach in Buffalo, with subsequent stops as the defensive coordinator in Washington, Jacksonville and New Orleans. Williams’ defenses were on the chippy side in Buffalo, but did nothing outrageous.
With Williams coordinating the defense in Washington (2004-2007) the Redskins had double-digit personal foul counts in all four seasons, and finished sixth in roughing-QB penalties in two of those years.
During Williams’ raucous three years in New Orleans (2009-2011) the Saints twice finished among the top three for most personal fouls, and had the most roughing-QB penalties in ’11. And of course there was the infamous “Bounty Gate” which resulted in Williams sitting out a one-year league suspension.
(For the record: I admire the way Williams served his time, never complained, and used his season away from the game to take a hard look at himself. Given the NFL’s shaky handling of the Bounty case, and the way some of the Saints were railroaded, it would have been easy for Williams to cast himself as some sort of innocent man, given a raw deal by commissioner Rodger Goodell. But Williams didn’t do that; he owned it and took the hit to his rep without protest. I’m not claiming he’s a “changed man” and all of that. But he is more enlightened.)
I don’t think anyone has ever categorized Fisher and Williams as angels; not unless they’ve been described as angels with dirty faces. So when a seething Minnesota Vikings coach Mike Zimmer took some post-game shots at Fisher and Williams after the Vikings’ 21-18 overtime win Sunday, there was at least some basis for his complaints.
The Vikings and their coach were offended by a Lamarcus Joyner elbow to the head — intentional or not — that knocked QB Teddy Bridgewater out of action with a concussion. Joyner was flagged with a personal foul and will draw a fine from the league office.
Of course, Zimmer had a chance to directly confront Fisher with his accusations in their brief post-game excchange, but Zimmer gave Fisher the quick, drive-by handshake and peeled off — saving his rippage of the Rams for his media conference.
Speaking to Vikings flagship station KFAN-AM, Zimmer said, “I agree that it was a cheap shot. His (Williams) defenses are all like that.”
And speaking to reporters after the game, Zimmer threw this out there: “If we were out in the street, we probably would’ve had a fight.”
Naturally, the coach spit out the tough talk about fighting in the streets after Fisher and Williams were already off the field, at safe distance, getting ready for the team’s flight home.
There’s only one problem with Zimmer’s little fit …
The coach declined to look at his own team.
Zimmer apparently has no interest in discussing the Vikings’ elevated penalty count for roughing the quarterback and personal fouls in 2015.
Or perhaps Zimmer was busy or distracted and forgot to look up the numbers.
Yeah, that must be it.
Penalties for Personal Fouls, 2015
Minnesota with 9 … only six NFL teams have more.
St. Louis with 5 … which is tied for 20th.
Penalties for Roughing the Passer, 2015
Minnesota with 4 … which is tied for third.
St. Louis with 2 … which is tied for 13th.
If you add the two categories together, the Vikings’ defense has 13 “cheap shot” penalties this season compared to 7 by the Rams.
It’s OK for an opposing coach to hold Fisher and Williams accountable and air his grievances.
But not this coach. Not Zimmer.
Naturally, the intense Zimmer was upset by the Bridgewater blow. But before he starts flinging those dirty-play accusations in press conferences and taking cheap shots at Williams, Zimmer might want to talk to his defensive players about doing a more honorable job of playing a clean game. Zimmer might want to address his defense and demand that the players cut down on their penalized abuse of quarterbacks and stay within the rules instead of being so reckless with personal fouls.
When a coach is in charge of a team that has 13 combined roughing-QB and personal foul infractions, he probably shouldn’t be delivering lectures to the coaches of a team that has only 7 such penalties.
As a longtime NFL defensive coordinator before becoming the Vikings’ head coach in 2014, Zimmer’s defenses showed up plenty of times on the league leader boards for most personal fouls and roughing-the-passer penalties.
In his 14 seasons (total) as the defensive coordinator in Dallas, Atlanta and Cincinnati, Zimmer’s defenses ranked among the league top 10 in personal fouls eight times, and finished in the top 10 for roughing seven times.
This includes two appearances among the top five in personal fouls, and six top-five finishes for roughing the QB.
And now we have the 2015 Vikings, who are among the league’s worst offenders in both categories.
So when Zimmer looks at the Rams and begins carping about their dirty hits on quarterbacks, I guess he qualifies as an expert, because his defenses have a fact-based history of frequent cheap hits on defenseless quarterbacks.
Zimmer’s hypocrisy is amusing.
But the undisputed champion of unmitigated hypocrisy is the one and only Rodney Harrison, the dirtiest player I’ve watched since I began covering and reporting on the NFL in 1982.
As you know, Harrison called out Fisher on NBC Sunday night, taking the coach to task for his teams’ history of dirty play.
This is priceless, coming from a guy that rarely hesitated to go cruising for attacks on a defenseless quarterback or receiver during his NFL career as a safety (1994-2008) with San Diego and New England. Harrison’s victims included Rams quarterback Trent Green during the 1999 preseason. Harrison lunged at Green’s knees, and Green suffered a season-terminating knee injury. (Enter: Kurt Warner.)
There is a reason why Harrison was named the NFL’s “Dirtiest Player” in a poll of league coaches in 2004, 2005 and 2008.
After Harrison “won” the award for the third time, Indianapolis receiver Brandon Stokely said, “I would have bet life savings on that.”
Harrison was suspended by the NFL for his vicious and gratuitous helmet-to-helmet assault on Hall of Fame wide receiver Jerry Rice in 2002 — and understand that Harrison’s gutless hit came at a time when NFL players could get away with the kind of filthy stuff that isn’t tolerated now. So his assault on Rice was especially heinous.
According to multiple media reports, Harrison amassed more than $200,000 in league fines for scuzzy play during his career.
Harrison also produced an impressive exacta: getting suspended for his on-field transgressions and for violating the league’s performance-enhancing drug policy.
In 2007, Harrison admitted to purchasing HGH (human growth hormone) “more than once” when questioned by the Albany (N.Y.) District Attorney’s office during an investigation of an HGH-peddling ring.
Harrison’s dig at Fisher was business as usual. It’s been his media strategy to change the subject — namely, his chronic habit of harming opponents that couldn’t defend themselves at the point of impact.
Harrison has a history of pointing the finger at others instead, and he has no shame or embarrassment about playing the role of victim.
After Harrison publicly called him a “dirty dude” former Tennessee center Kevin Mawae spoke out in a 2009 interview:
“If Rodney Harrison wants to accuse somebody of being dirty, tell him to look at his 16 years of highlights. I guarantee he got fined more in one year than I have in my entire career.”
On NBC, Harrison accused Fisher of laughing on the sideline during a 2006 game after Harrison suffered a season-ending knee injury on a low hit from Tennessee wide receiver Bobby Wade. Fisher vehemently denied this, and called Harrison a “meathead” on Monday night’s Jeff Fisher Show on 101 ESPN.
In that same 2009 interview, Mawae denied that the Titans were laughing at Harrison.
“Maybe it’s just the way to deflect the attention away from himself,” Mawae said. “I think everybody knows that’s been in this league a long time that he may be the dirtiest guy that’s ever played this game … I think somebody forgot to tell him that that long wide, three foot white line on the sidelines, we play inside those. He spent a lot of his time playing outside of those.”
Earlier this season Harrison predicted that the Miami Dolphins would attempt to cheap shot New England quarterback Tom Brady to take him out. (They didn’t.)
Also this season, Harrison criticized Minnesota linebacker Anthony Barr for a hit on Detroit QB.
Harrison — imagine this — simply wouldn’t tolerate such a cheap shot on an NFL quarterback … yeah, even though Harrison was guilty of many such QB bombing runs in his days as an irresponsible missile-safety.
Harrison said he would have “punched that young guy right in the face” for the “cheap shot” on Stafford.
Barr was penalized for a personal foul.
And just to add some additional humor to this … the same Mike Zimmer that was so high and mighty in criticizing the Rams claimed that Barr’s hit was clean.
Sure, coach. You betcha.
Your players are saints.
A pure as that Minnesota snow.
Speaking a guest on Boston radio station WEEI on Tuesday, Harrison was asked if he’d like to rebut Fisher’s lengthy criticism. Earlier Monday at Rams Park, a prepared Fisher dismissed Harrison by citing Harrison’s prolific penalty count as a player.
Harrison initially begged off, saying “I would love to really go in like I really want to do in my heart and soul but the guys at NBC, the higher-ups told me, ‘Please don’t respond to it,’ so they’re the guys that sign my check.”
But of course, Harrison immediately contradicted himself by responding to Fisher — seconds after saying he wouldn’t respond to Fisher.
“But I will say this, if anybody knows about a dirty hit, it’s me,” Harrison said.
(Rodney should have stopped right there. Finally, some truth.)
“And that’s all it was. It was about addressing the issue,” Harrison continued. “It was a dirty hit (on Bridgewater.) That’s what I said. And I referenced to back what I experienced with his teams and what other players have told me coming from his team, and other people. People around the league know the truth, bottom line. I’m not going to get into any details because I’m just not going to go there. I was asked not to go there. But the bottom line is, if you’ve been in the league, you know the truth.”
Later, Harrison whined, “They always want to bring out the negative. It’s not because I didn’t do it to personally attack (Fisher.) I didn’t do it to evoke a response. I said it because it was in my soul, it was in my spirit and it was something that I experienced, first hand. I knew that it was a dirty hit, what Bobby Wade did to me. I looked up and saw on the sidelines guys laughing and joking, OK?
“(Fisher) can point out all the dirty things that I’ve done or the penalties, but the bottom line is this, you can’t take away what I’ve accomplished in my career. And the funny thing about it, when you play against those type teams, afterward coaches come up to you, ‘Man, I wish I had you on my team. Man, I wish you could bring that physicality with us. We need a guy like you.’ It’s the same coaches. It’s the same coaches on the staff coming to me wishing that I was on their team.”
(Harrison has a point there. Is there any doubt that Coach Fisher loves defensive players that intimidate and rattle opponents with wicked hits?)
True to his nature, Harrison played the victim card on WEEI.
Fortunately, sports-talk radio stations do not use polygraphs during interviews.
“There have been times where I really crossed the line, no doubt about it,” Harrison said. “But there are other times when I felt like I’ve been targeted. When you get a reputation with the NFL, they’re going to look at you, everything single thing you do, from uniform, I’d jog out on the field, ‘Hey Harrison, we’re watching you.’ Man, leave me the hell alone. You’re watching me? We’re in warmups, and you’re telling me. All of sudden, I know that you’re talking about me in New York, so I have no leeway.”
Harrison was targeted?
(Laugh track).
“At times, I didn’t think it was fair, but I understood,” Harrison said. “It was just one of those situations where I understood that the NFL was after me and they were going to fine me for everything and use me as an example and I was just going to play football. If they take 20, 30-thousand dollars from me, I grew up with nothing, so trust me, whatever I’m making above that, I’m OK.”
There’s no question about that. Despite the more than $200,000 in NFL fines for cheap shots, for all of the legitimate stains on his reputation, for the times he was named the league’s dirtiest player, for all of those instances where he showed no respect for the health and safety of a fellow NFL player, and for his suspension for buying and using HGH …
Harrison retired and was rewarded with a great gig on NBC. He spends Sunday nights in the studio where he gets the chance to take whacks at NFL players and coaches for misconduct that doesn’t come close to matching Harrison’s own history of rotten behavior.
The NFL is truly a special habitat, isn’t it?
As for Fisher, he shouldn’t take offense so easily. His teams aren’t exactly meek.
Zimmer and Harrison weren’t wrong to cite the Fisher-Williams reputation. Sometimes the roughness is necessary.
But given their odious histories, Zimmer and Harrison lack the credibility to deliver sermons on unsportsmanlike conduct.
znModeratorWes Welker can help Rams offense, but it’s best to manage expectations
Nick Wagoner
EARTH CITY, Mo. — It took a four-game suspension to Stedman Bailey for it to happen, but the St. Louis Rams did what many fans had been clamoring for Monday when they signed a veteran wide receiver to help a floundering passing game.
That veteran is Wes Welker, the 34-year-old slot specialist with 890 career receptions to his name.
Welker signed early Monday evening and promptly began the process of getting acclimated to the offense. Before he is fully thrown into the mix, let’s take a look at what to expect and what not to expect:
1. He’s not an all-encompassing solution for the passing game: Because of Welker’s name value and history of production, especially relative to the Rams’ current group of receivers, it’s easy say he’s an upgrade over what they already have. To be sure, Welker is instantly the most accomplished receiver on the roster. It’s really not even close: He has played in three Super Bowls and has been selected to five Pro Bowls. But Welker’s age and recent injury history had him on the free-agent market this late in the season for a reason. It’s best to calibrate expectations at this point in his career. The Rams’ passing game simply isn’t very good right now, and Welker isn’t a panacea.
2. He can help the awful third-down conversion rate: Welker could still give the Rams at least an incremental improvement in the passing game. When he’s ready to go, Welker will play in the slot. He’s a good route-runner with quickness, good hands and a long history of knowing where the first-down marker is. Of his 890 receptions, 515 have gone for first downs. That ranks seventh in the NFL among active receivers. That knack for knowing how to move the chains could be especially useful for the Rams, who sit last in the NFL in converting third downs at 23.8 percent.
3. Tavon Austin should benefit from his presence: In his prime, Welker was a multi-purpose threat who returned punts and was used in multiple ways. While he never had Austin’s speed, Welker does have the knowledge and experience to be a positive influence. Austin has improved this season and his overall production is up, but having Welker around to teach him some nuances of route-running should be good for Austin.
4. The Rams are OK with his health: Between Nov. 17, 2013, and Aug. 23, 2014, Welker suffered three concussions. Coach Jeff Fisher said the Rams felt comfortable with Welker’s health after he went through a workout and had the necessary physicals before signing.
5. He might not play this week: Welker just arrived in St. Louis and hasn’t played in the first nine weeks. He has a new playbook to learn and though his legs are fresh, it’s possible he won’t be ready to play right out of the chute. The Rams have undrafted rookie Bradley Marquez ready to step into Bailey’s special teams role, but he could also take some more snaps on offense. To get Welker ready, the Rams will likely pare down what they ask him to learn right away. If he takes well to that, he could play against Chicago. If he doesn’t, it’s a safe bet he’ll be good to go the next week against Baltimore.
znModeratorJeff Fisher responds to criticism from Rodney Harrison
Mike Florio
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/category/rumor-mill/page/2/
After Sunday’s game against the Rams, which included a knockout blow to Minnesota quarterback Teddy Bridgewater, Vikings coach Mike Zimmer threw a dart or two at St. Louis defensive coordinator Gregg Williams. Later that night, Rodney Harrison of NBC’s Football Night in America aimed a level higher.
“I wasn’t surprised because it happened to me in 2006,” Harrison said. “[Titans receiver] Bobby Wade came and chopped my knees and tore my knee up. I’m lying on the ground, and I look at Jeff Fisher and he’s smiling and laughing. So this is typical of Jeff Fisher-type teams.”
It wasn’t the first time Harrison said this; in a 2009 appearance on The Dan Patrick Show, Harrison made the same comments.
Six years ago, Fisher didn’t respond. This time, he did.
“I don’t want to say I took things personal, but it was kind of a personal attack on me,” Fisher told reporters on Monday. “I think you have to consider the source. . . . You’re talking about a guy that had a great career. I mean, the guy played a long time. He was hard to defend. He was a really active defensive player. But this is coming from a guy that had 18 unnecessary roughness penalties, seven personal fouls, four roughing the passer penalties, a total of 77 penalties in his career and was voted three times the dirtiest player in the National Football League and was suspended for a hit, a helmet-to-helmet hit on Jerry Rice in 2002. Okay? This is where these comments are coming from. I’ll just say this: Since 2000, it’s been a privilege and honor for me to be on the Competition Committee. Our main focus, as you guys have followed this league for a long time know, our main focus is player safety. So, for Rodney to come out and say that I did something like that is absolutely absurd. So, that’s all I have to say on that.”
Fisher separately was asked whether it bothers him that his teams have been called dirty or chippy.
“I haven’t heard that,” Fisher said. “So, we are going to play fast. We are going to physical and we’re going to play furious and we’re going to play contact football. Okay?”
But the charge of dirty and/or chippy play isn’t new. In 2012, when Fisher became coach of the Rams, Bernie Miklasz of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch (via an assist from Mike Sando of ESPN.com) pointed out that, from 2001 to 2010, the Titans: (1) led the NFL in most personal fouls with 163; (2) had 67 unnecessary roughness penalties, leading the NFL; and (3) had 46 roughing the passer penalties, leading the NFL. More recently, Miklasz combined the full Houston/Tennessee years with Fisher’s Rams teams and concluded that Fisher’s teams had 236 more penalties than their opponents, 1,937 more penalty yards than their opponents, 116 fewer first downs via penalties than their opponents.
Last year, Giants linebacker Jameel McClain dubbed the Rams a “dirty ass team” after a fight that broke out following a late hit from St. Louis linebacker Alec Ogletree on New York receiver Odell Beckham Jr.
So it’s hardly the first time someone has called out a Fisher-coached team. It’s also not the first time someone has taken direct aim at Fisher.
In 2007, former Chargers linebacker Shawne Merriman suffered a sprained knee on what he dubbed a “cheap shot” from former Titans center Kevin Mawae and former Titans tackle David Stewart. Merriman said that “several” Chargers players told him Fisher had ordered the hit on Merriman. Reprising the remarks with Colin Cowherd of FOX Sports Radio on Monday, Merriman said that he heard Fisher had ordered the hit from Titans players, too.
On one hand, football is football. Players use raw physicality to achieve results, from overpowering the opponent on a given play to intimidating him on future plays. On the other hand, there’s a line between using force to get results and doing so to inflict injury, especially as the NFL attempts to secure its future by promoting health and safety in a game that is inherently unhealthy and unsafe for those who play it.
The problem is that the recipients of physicality aimed at the former often will perceive it as an effort to accomplish the latter. And it becomes difficult if not impossible to get those inflicting the physicality and those absorbing it to agree regarding the intentions.
znModeratorI dunno what any of that proves, other
than he HAS built good teams.
Six times.I think just averaging out Fisher’s record without a sense of context ends up giving a false picture.
If you look at Fisher’s actual history, instead of just averaging the totals, you get a very distinct picture.
95-98. A few years of building a winner while also moving. Not an ideal situation to take over.
99-2003. Consecutive years of winning (punctuated by one losing season).
2004-6. A personnel crisis highlighted by huge cap problems, injuries, and free agency losses.
2007-8. Emerging with winning seasons.
2009-10 Then more crises particularly at qb but also with the owner.
2012-14 Then taking over a team that did inherit some talent, but the inherited talent was young. That team is set back by crucial injuries to both qb and the OL.
So I see long peaks and valleys. The valleys have causes you can point to (95-98, 2004-6, 2012-14). He then has turnarounds. IMO just averaging the season totals hides all that.
znModeratorYou know, all this stuff on Foles’s flaws was completely visible at the time of the trade. Here, we have whole long threads on it. Nothing he did Sunday…with a young and injured OL, including one replacement PFF ranked as the worst player at his position for the week (Donnal)…is or ought to be a surprise.
Even in Philly he was good for a complete meltdown game per year.
Meanwhile, he has virtues mixed in with that which people lose sight of in what is (IMO) post-loss lament mode. They beat Seattle without Gurley, came within a dropped Kendricks pass of nearly beating Pittsburgh.
I honestly have not heard a single complaint that wasn’t already there to contemplate, clear and open, before the season started. Heck for that matter, all the same things were visible in the Rams/Eagles game last year. So some of us saying he can be a good qb…with a clutch dimension added in…knew about those flaws before we said it. My repeat mantra was that he can be a good qb if he has both a solid OL and a running game.
And I still think that’s just going to be how it plays out.
Yes Bradford was the better qb, by a lot. And I was one of the ones saying that I thought Bradford had a chance to play after 2 knees and always argued against the “china doll” thing. (I also said I got the trade because that was a kind of risk they couldn’t afford.) But then notice that Bradford struggled up until the last game too. Why? Not because it was Bradford, any more than Foles’s 2 bad games (Vikes and GB) are just entirely Foles. The situation was part of it in both cases.
znModeratorRams offense not varied enough to beat Vikings
Nick Wagoner
http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/23431/rams-offense-not-varied-enough-to-beat-vikings
EARTH CITY, Mo. — Looking back at three things to watch from the St. Louis Rams’ 21-18 loss to the Minnesota Vikings on Sunday:
1. It’s always the turnovers: In a game that figured to be close, turnovers looked to make a difference. And they nearly did. The Rams had the game’s lone takeaway, an impressive interception by cornerback Trumaine Johnson that killed a Minnesota drive in the end zone at the beginning of the third quarter.
But it was a couple of missed opportunities for takeaway No. 2 that might have been the ultimate difference maker. At the beginning of the fourth quarter, the Vikings were near midfield and driving when running back Adrian Peterson fumbled on consecutive plays. On the first one, the ball was on the field for a couple of seconds before it narrowly squirted out of bounds. It was a golden chance for the Rams to take over with prime field position and potentially take the lead.
Instead, luck was on the Vikings’ side and they overcame their minus-one turnover differential to steal the win.
2. Getting their kicks: Similar to the first category, this one goes against the Rams, not because of something they did but something they didn’t do. Kicker Greg Zuerlein was 4-of-5 on field goals, including a franchise record 61-yard effort and a 53-yarder to send the game to overtime. He did miss a 48-yarder earlier in the fourth quarter which might have given the Rams a chance to win in regulation, but overall he had a pretty good day in blustery conditions.
But the biggest mark here against the Rams is eschewing an extra point attempt in the first quarter to go for two when the score was 10-6. The kick would have been at the windy end of the field, but Zuerlein said he had felt comfortable kicking that direction between 45 and 48 yards out before the game. The extra point would have been 12 to 15 yards shorter.
Rams coach Jeff Fisher said he went for two because of the wind and because he felt the Rams would need every possible point. But if that’s true, then one would think that one point would have been particularly desirable. A made extra point there or a conversion from Zuerlein on the 48-yard attempt might have been enough to give the Rams a victory.
3. An offensive evolution: Despite lukewarm checkmarks in the Rams’ favor in the first two categories, this is the one that worked against them the most. Minnesota loaded up defensively to stop running back Todd Gurley, and receiver/running back Tavon Austin made the Vikings pay for it early. But when Minnesota adjusted to slow Austin, the Rams didn’t have an answer with anyone else on the team. Wideout Kenny Britt did have three catches for 87 yards, including a 55-yarder, and was open for another one, but the Rams simply aren’t getting enough from quarterback Nick Foles and the passing game. Until that happens, it’s going to be hard for the Rams to win these type of games on the road.
November 9, 2015 at 8:30 pm in reply to: Jeff Fisher Press Conference – 11/9(16:44) – Video & transcript #33869
znModeratorYeah, right. We’ll get better. Just like that. With poor WRs and a lousy QB … Sure. We’ll get better.
What a maroon this guy is.
I completely disagree. I think that’s exactly what he should say, because part of coaching is the combination of drive to do it and optimism. As for the receivers, every single one of them except Tavon was better last year—at everything. It was the talk of camp and it was the talk of the early season last year. And Fisher’s right…it’s far from being one thing anyway. All I know is, early in the season last year there was talk around about Wms. being a bust as a coach. Now they are rightly considered a top defense even as the injuries mount up. This time last year no one could imagine what they would be like with Quinn out, Long out, and Hayes playing banged up. Yet for all that they went on the road against a good team where they should have been at a distinct disadvantage but came just short of winning it and in fact for a lot of the game I thought they would win it. Well the offense is doing the exact same thing right now the defense was last year—very slow out of the gate. In fact given how slow out of the gate they are, it’s really interesting that they are 4-4.
Bradford, same thing. Struggled for several games in a row in a new offense, and then click, last night it turned on.
I don’t like the world where people tell each other what they are allowed to say and think, and this board does not do that. No one on the board does it. We just respectfully put up opinions and encourage the next guy to add his 2 cents too. So I just consider this another opinion beside yours. I guess the key is, I think yes they can improve because both Foles and the receivers have already been better than this, but adding a new young line to a new coordinator to a new qb is just not going to look top notch at first. If I am right then we will all see them stabilize and be better. If I am wrong then that will never happen. It won’t be too hard to tell the difference.
But I thought what Fisher said was apt, right, and what he’s supposed to say. He’s supposed to believe he can make it work. He wouldn’t be a coach if he didn’t think that, he would be a hospice counselor or something. I have no problem with him saying what he said. Just a different 2 cents.
November 9, 2015 at 7:55 pm in reply to: Jeff Fisher Press Conference – 11/9(16:44) – Video & transcript #33865
znModeratorRams Head Coach Jeff Fisher – – 11/9/15
(Opening statement)
“I can confirm that (WR) Stedman Bailey has been suspended for the next four weeks. Very, very disappointed in his choices. He let himself down in addition to letting his teammates and this organization down. We have a strict policy as it relates to substance abuse and he violated the policy. Fortunately, we’ll get him back in a month. A setback for us from an offensive standpoint. A setback from a special teams standpoint. I’ve had numerous conversations with ‘Sted.’ He understands that this is his last go-around. If he wants to flourish in this league, have a career in this league, he’s going to have to change his lifestyle. He’s regretful. There’s a chance that he’ll be able to be in the building the next four weeks. We’re still trying to get confirmation as to whether he can work out here or be present. My gut feel is that he’ll be able to work out, but you won’t see him on the practice field, nor will he be permitted to be in the meeting room. Disappointing loss for us, but one that was out of our control. The message has been sent to the players. I’m disappointed that it’s back-to-back weeks here. We’re talking about (RB) Trey Watts and Stedman Bailey. We’re not the only team in the league that’s dealing with this, but we’re going to take an aggressive approach to make sure that these things don’t happen in the future. That would explain the reason for the wide receiver workouts today. We’re trying to stay ahead of schedule. We had the three receivers in this morning and currently, as it stands right now, we are working towards…hoping to agree to terms with Wes Welker to come in and help us. He had a great workout this morning. He’s really excited about where this team is going and I think he can potentially help us in a lot of different areas, specifically on third down and keeping the chains moving. That’s kind of a personnel update for you right now.“As far as the game is concerned, as coaches we look at it and talk about them. It was really close. This game was close. We had a lot of opportunities. The wind was clearly a factor. We nearly overcame that, but we fell short. A lot of good things. A lot of things we need to continue to work on. As I told you guys yesterday, third down offense, first down offense. We’ve got to play better run defense. It was really close, as I said, to handing out a couple of game balls after a win to (T) Andrew Donnal and (S) Maurice Alexendar because I thought for their first starts they played pretty well. But, we don’t give game balls out after losses. I’ll give you an example of how close things are. (P) Johnny (Hekker) hit that punt in overtime on fourth-and-16 and he really hit it well. The ball is fielded on the 21-yard line. We have a block in the back on the 31-yard line that’s not called. The ball pushes out to midfield. If it’s called, then the ball goes back to the 11. So, we have a difference in 40 yards in field position in overtime with them with the wind. I’m not faulting the officiating department, it’s just that’s how close winning and losing is right now and that’s how it was yesterday.”
(On if that was the block on TE Cory Harkey)
“Yes. It was just missed and it happens sometimes. It just happens. That’s not the difference in the ballgame, but it’s one of those things that comes up in close games, especially in an overtime loss that you look at.”(On the block in the back taking place near the play)
“We had two right in similar situations, just right there in front of the ball carrier that were not called. This one was significant. But, it happens. There was some other non-calls in the game, which we all live with. And then there were some other really, really good calls by the officiating department.”(On taking an aggressive approach with Bailey)
“We’ve been educating our players for years. There’s a procedure and there’s a protocol and they have to adhere to it. Once you go in the testing program, if you have another violation, then you’re going to be subject to whatever the circumstances are. You can’t take it lightly. Like I said, he was remorseful and felt bad. He’s letting the team down and we’re going to miss him for four weeks and hopefully he’ll learn from his choices.”(On if there is a problem league-wide with players failing drug tests)
“I can’t go there. It’s been a problem here for us the last couple of weeks. We’ve lost two pretty good players. We’ve got to do whatever we can to get that message across to them. Again, it happens. It’s a club-to-club thing. We deal with them and deal with all kinds of things with the younger players. Just disappointed in ‘Sted.’ He’s a good teammate. He’s a good player. You have to carry over your workplace attitude into your off the field life. He failed us on that.”(On checking out Welker with his history with concussions)
“Oh yeah, we’ve done physicals, we did the workout, we’ve done everything. Everything was good. We’ll see. We’re close, but I don’t know. It may work out, it may not. But, I know we’re close. I just got a thumbs up that the deal’s done. Wes will be part of our football team.”(On if it can be tough for a player to come back after not being with a team for a long period of time)
“He’s in outstanding shape. We saw that early this morning. He’s in great shape. He’s anxious and eager to play. He’s moved the chains for two potential Hall of Fame quarterbacks and he’s good at what he does and he understands it. We already had a visit with him and (QB) Nick (Foles) and they’re excited. Whether he’s active this week, I can’t predict because we have a short period of time to get him caught up. I think he’ll eventually move some chains for us.”(On if WR Bradley Marquez can fill in for Bailey)
“He can. He’s going to have to step up and fill Sted’s void in a lot of special teams areas right now as well.”(On if a player like Welker can help them out on third down)
“Yes.”(On third down being historically bad)
“It is. It’s not good. We need to get better. Four in three games is not good. Like I said, I’ll take five or six of them, but four in three games is not good. We have to get better. That’s a coaching thing. That’s a player thing. That’s a quarterback thing. It’s everybody that’s involved in that, so we’ll get better.”(On if there’s any follow up after looking at the tape of CB Lamarcus Joyner’s hit on Vikings QB Teddy Bridgewater)
“No. Lamarcus plays hard every down and he plays reckless. Unfortunately, there was contact to the head of (Vikings QB) Teddy (Bridgewater) and he was penalized for it. I can’t fault him for his choice. There was another situation in the game where the same thing could have very well happened and (CB Janoris Jenkins) ‘Jenks’ was involved. Teddy slid a little bit late and ‘Jenks’ wasn’t in position to time the slide up. Again, I’m hearing that Teddy is okay and I’m hoping that he plays this week and that was the same thing I said yesterday.”(On if he’s aware of the reaction in Minnesota and the notion of him having a ‘dirty team’)
“I think a good a lesson to be learned from this is control your emotions immediately after the game and go back and look at the tape before you jump to conclusions. Now, clearly it’s been said. Clearly, (Vikings Head Coach) Mike’s (Zimmer) and my handshake was very short. He didn’t say a word. I went out to congratulate him. I was going to ask him how his quarterback was and congratulate him on the win and he was gone. I understand that, but you also need to control your emotions after a game and go look at the tape and then adjust accordingly. Again, I don’t know who they play this week. I don’t care, but we’ve moved on. We’re on to Chicago.”(On what he saw on tape with the nature of DB Lamarcus Joyner’s tackle)
“Lamarcus made a decision to go hit the quarterback prior to (Vikings QB) Teddy (Bridgewater) initiating the slide. That’s what happens. Had Lamarcus not made helmet contact with him, there would have not been a foul. It was penalized on the field. What more can you ask for?”(On his thoughts about Rodney Harrison criticizing him)
“Yeah, I saw it as a matter of fact. I was actually…I don’t want to say I took things personal, but it was kind of a personal attack on me. But, again, I think you have to consider the source. I saw it last night on the airplane. You’re talking about a guy that had a great career. I mean, the guy played a long time. He was hard to defend. He was a really active defensive player. But, this is coming from a guy that had 18 unnecessary roughness penalties, seven personal fouls, four roughing the passer penalties, a total of 77 penalties in his career and was voted three times the dirtiest player in the National Football League and was suspended for a hit, a helmet-to-helmet hit on Jerry Rice in 2002. Okay? This is where these comments are coming from. I’ll just say this: Since 2000, it’s been a privilege and honor for me to be on the competition committee. Our main focus, as you guys have followed this league for a long time know, our main focus is player safety. So, for Rodney to come out and say that I did something like that is absolutely absurd. So, that’s all I have to say on that.”(On Harrison not being well regarded in St. Louis for a hit he had on Trent Green in 1999)
“I just…look, Rodney’s Rodney and we move on.”(On if it bothers him when people say that his teams are dirty or chippy)
“I haven’t heard that. So, we are going to play fast. We are going to physical and we’re going to play furious and we’re going to play contact football. Okay? What bothers me right now is the stuff before and after the whistle. Those are the things that bother me, namely defensive offsides. That’s a problem. That’s something I have to get fixed. I don’t have to worry about the manner in which our players play. They play hard. We had seven going into last week. We had five. We’ve had 12 defensive offsides in three games and that is too many. It doesn’t win games for you, so we have to get that fixed.”(On how he plans on fixing the defensive offsides issue)
“I can’t give…I’m not going to share it. But, we’re going to get it fixed. I’ll back them off. They can line up three yards off the ball. We’ll get a running start after the ball’s snapped. But, I’m going to figure out a way to eliminate defensive offsides.”(On how he plans on fixing the third down conversion issues)
“We just have to continue to work on it. Give (QB) Nick (Foles) some options, different concepts, do better on first downs. You guys have got the numbers. We had 16. We’re two for 16. I think six of them were seven to 10 and we had four or five that were 10 plus. It’s hard. So, it all works together. But, we have to get better there.”(On if he thinks the offense is too reliant on big plays)
“No, I don’t think we’ve had enough big plays. We need more big plays. We need big runs. We need chunks. We need to change field position. We’ve played some good defenses, so we’re back to work. We’re due for a breakout game on offense.”(On if he has any second thoughts about going for the two point conversion)
“No. Six points in the game were scored against the wind. Six. So, and I knew we were going to have to score points. We got down there, the wind wasn’t a factor and we decided to go for it. We just didn’t execute.”(On if he would have made the same choice the Vikings did in overtime)
“I would have taken the ball. I would have taken the ball and/or taken the wind. I would not have won the toss and taken the wind. No.”(On how he can get more out of QB Nick Foles)
“I mean, we’re halfway through the season. It’s a new system. He’s eight weeks into it and we just have to keep working at it, which we will.”(On how he thinks DE Matt Longacre performed)
“Matt was productive. Yeah, he got off some blocks and made some plays. He was good. I mean, you look at the tape and you’ve got three guys that really haven’t played much and there were some redeeming qualities to all three: that’s (G) Andrew (Donnal) and of course (S) Maurice (Alexander) and Matt. So, he was effective.”(On how he thinks T Garrett Reynolds performed)
“Garrett did fine. He played there. He’s played there. Like I said after the game, he’s played against those guys. So, he had a good feel for it.”(On what he saw from S Maurice Alexander and G Andrew Donnal)
“Well, they made plays. They were in position. There were a couple mistakes here and there, but it wasn’t overwhelming to them. Their first time to really line up and start on the road, especially with Andrew with the noise and all that kind of stuff and the guys they had up front, the game wasn’t big for him. He’s got a lot of room for improvement, but he’s going to benefit from that experience as will Maurice.”(On S T.J. McDonald and DE Robert Quinn and T Rob Havenstein’s status)
“I think we’re probably looking to late Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. I think we’ll get everybody back at some point on the field. So, we’ll have a better idea.”(On if he’s concerned with Foles not seeing the open receivers)
“Well, I mean, the position’s hard. I mean, you don’t know what he sees and who’s in front of him. But, he’s got a progression. He’s got to read. He’s got to go to the right place. So, yeah, there’s room for improvement there. I mean, yeah, the first play of the game, (WR) Kenny’s (Britt) 10 yards behind the secondary and he just didn’t see him. So, it happens sometimes.”(On if RB Trey Watts is still allowed to be in the building due to his suspension)
“Yes. Trey will have…he has permission to be in the building to condition and lift and workout, yes. No meetings and no practice.”
znModeratorI think wv is mostly concerned about the “passing” offense though. A lot of the big plays are actually running plays.
And not all of them. In fact the Vikes contained Gurley yet at one point I thought the Rams would win.
The mistake I see everyone making is they are taking one bad result and magnifying it, and losing sight of the fact that this is a young new offense, with the least experienced OL any of us have ever seen or heard of.
Naturally an offense like that is inconsistent. But it also has the pieces to settle down and become consistent.
If everything were as bad as everyone says, why were they beaten in overtime by 3 points, while on the road with key defenders missing with Foles having a very up and down day and Gurley contained.
We’ve been through 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2011. We would have done anything in the past to have them be that competitive under those conditions.
…
znModeratorWho can process at real time speed? The rams will errs on the side of aggressiveness which I like. As they say – if I had it all to do over, I’d do it just the same.
Oh I don’t think that was just a mistake. He wanted a piece of the qb, he just didn’t want to do a flagrant kill shot. It just backfired on him.
znModeratorJim Thomas @jthom1 7m7 minutes ago
Rams remain last in 3rd-down conversion rate (23.8%); they have converted only 24 off 101 third downs into first downs this season.Jim Thomas @jthom1 9m9 minutes ago
Foles ranks 27th in passer rating (79.7), 28th in 3rd-down passing (62.9), and 31st in 4th-quarter passing (71.6).Jim Thomas @jthom1 12m12 minutes ago
Rams move up to 5th in total defense following Minnesota game, but are 31st in total offense and 32nd in passing offense.And Jim watches them so he knows this is true too: they’re a mess because they are young and have not come together yet, BUT even given that they make enough big plays to be in games.
We would burn all the sage in the universe to have gotten even that much in 2009 or 2011.
So ironically, the Rams are low in a lot of passing stats…yet 16th in points.
That is something that has to be explained. How can it be both.
Well, it’s the “young and struggling and not coherent but can make big plays and be in games” factor.
Which may make it one of the worst Rams offenses in terms of YARDS…but far from REALLY being one of the worst offenses. This one is just not together yet. Which means it CAN come together, though I ain’t promising when.
.
znModeratorWell i think Bowen misses the main point —
What I see on replay is Joyner zooming in like a rocket
and changing his angle slightly so as to either
miss the QB completely and just strafe him,
or to just graze him to let him know Joyner
is out there. What i dont see is Joyner
taking aim and trying to hurt the QB.
Looked to me like there was a very subtle
change of angle by Joyner to ‘avoid’ a major collision.Penalty? Yes. Intentional head-hunting? Nah.
w
vI agree with that. Joyner wanted a little deniable piece of action. He didn’t calculate on the qb’s head bouncing off the turf. But I don’t think he was out for a kill. I think he was surprised by the result. Problem is if you’re out for a little “deniable” piece of over the edge playing, you can’t calculate the results. So better not to do it.
,
znModeratorNo.
Just off the top of my head, it was worse in 2009 and 2011.
This one fails to consistently get yards but makes plays in spurts.
Former ones didn’t even do THAT. They just failed to get yards.
That’s because this one isn’t a collapsed and broken offense like in those years. This one is a struggling offense that has the ingredients to get better.
For example look at the point differential.
2009: Rams 10.9 v. 27.25
2011: Rams 12 v, 25.4
2015: Rams 19.1 v. 18.25The difference again being that the 2 previous years represent complete collapse (mostly from injuries but also from personnel issues).
This one ranks low statistically but manages to make some big plays. But it is low statistically not because it is damaged, but because it is young and inexperienced as a unit, without the kind of cohesion they need, but which will come later.
znModeratorSo if Foles is the weak link–if he has hit is ceiling and this is it–this is what we’ll get week in and week out–inability to convert 3rd downs, 3 and outs, no real confidence from the coach–limits on where he will throw the ball–what does that mean?
I personally don’t believe that.
I think the weak link is having an inexperienced, young OL.
Both Minnesota and GB attacked the line and took it apart, and one result was, Foles played worse under pressure.
But then it’s a rare qb who doesn’t.
To me this is an old conversation going back to 2007, when several folks blamed Bulger for the season, when he was playing behind one of the most injury-wracked lines I have ever seen since I starting following the NFL. For some reason, many folks back then just could not factor line play into the equation. I think the same mistake is happening now.
Give Foles reasonable time, give the offense a reasonable running threat, and I think he’s a pretty good play action qb.
The problem is, since we have never seen a team with an OL this young and inexperienced, we don’t know when it will stabilize. But odds are it will.
.
znModeratorIn a close game like that, it is hard for me to pick any one thing that lost the game.
Well logically that’s true but in my case, I measure how the flow of the game feels. At what point do I think, okay this thing here made it harder to get a win. It’s a momentum thing. So I just remember that while watching the game, that’s what I felt—my instincts were, blowing that opportunity would cost them, and flipped the game. Up until that point in fact I thought they had a strong chance of winning.
So it’s just different people looking at the thing differently.
I am not arguing someone else has to see it my way by any means—just adding my own 2 cents.
…
znModeratorKnockout blow to Teddy Bridgewater wasn’t Bountygate 2.0
Matt Bowen
ESPN InsiderMinnesota Vikings quarterback Teddy Bridgewater knew the drill when he pulled the ball down to run early in the fourth quarter on Sunday versus the St. Louis Rams. All quarterbacks do. Pick up the first down there, add a couple of rushing yards to the stat column and then slide, dive, whatever. Just get the yardage, get down and live to see the next play.
But Bridgewater still paid for it. And the reality is quarterbacks often will in a league where the QB is the ultimate target, regardless of who is coaching the defense.
The hit? Yeah, it looked nasty. A vicious shot from Rams defensive back Lamarcus Joyner, delivered right as Bridgewater was sliding, or giving himself up. Put that thing in slow motion and you can see the quarterback’s head snap down on the turf. It knocked him right out of the game. He was finished.
Immediately after the hit, there was talk of another Gregg Williams’ coached defense intentionally targeting players. That hit from Joyner was dirty, right? I get it. The Bountygate tales were going to surface given Williams’ past history in the league. I’ve been on a defense with Williams running the show, and I’ve seen the bounties.
But before we go pin the hit on Williams, a coach I should admit I respect as much as any I’ve played for, let’s just be honest about the situation from an on-field standpoint.
Williams is a master motivator, a true teacher, a veteran coach who gets the most out of his guys. And his defenses do push the envelope. They walk the line. Always. But to try and pair that with the Joyner hit? Nah. That’s a reach. Bridgewater wasn’t put on some pregame list with dollar signs next to his name in the program. That’s a lazy narrative, a reach to cover up the real story in the NFL. The truth is, if we didn’t know what we do about Williams from Bountygate, we wouldn’t be able to discern the intent of his defenses from any other team.
This is a fact: Quarterbacks are always targeted, regardless of who is running the defense that day. Take them out, within or on the edge of the rules, and your chances of winning increase dramatically.
Plays like this are easy to critique from the couch or even in the stands. You see a quarterback go down, especially when the head is involved, and the outrage floods social media. Everyone knows the ramifications of concussions, and everyone is an expert, just waiting to throw out opinions, to gain a voice on a hit that doesn’t mesh with their standards of clean, ethical play.
When Bridgewater started to slide, everything went wrong. It was the imperfect combination of NFL speed and a QB in the open field. If you want to say Joyner was intentionally trying to bounce Bridgewater’s head off the turf like a basketball, then go with it. I probably won’t change your mind, and that’s fine. But I just don’t believe he was looking to make contact with the helmet of the quarterback. That wasn’t his plan when he broke downhill and prepared himself to deliver the hit. The rest? Well, it happens when angles change at the last second.
Yes, it was a brutal hit. But put yourself in the shoes of Joyner, or any defender in the NFL that sees the quarterback tuck that ball to run. I’ve been there, and regardless of who your coach is, your mindset is clear: That’s fresh meat in the open field. If you have a shot — a legitimate shot — then you drop your pads and put it on him. Make it physical, too. That’s not meathead stuff here, it’s just football the way you’ve been trained to play. And while slow motion tells you one thing, in the pros, it happens so fast, like lightning, that defenders just can’t pull off in time to save a guy.
I’ve watched the hit from Joyner over and over. And I’ve been in those situations as a player. There was an opportunity there for Joyner — leading with his shoulder — to put Bridgewater down, to let him know that running the ball against his defense wasn’t the best idea going forward. “Next time,” Joyner is thinking, “just hang in the pocket and make the throw, or we will take you out.” That’s the message you are trying to send as a defensive player.
Nice? No, it’s not. But that’s the reality of the NFL.
ESPN.com NFL analyst Matt Bowen played seven seasons in the NFL.
znModeratorRams’ Lamarcus Joyner merits major NFL discipline for illegal shot
Kevin Seifert
The NFL has a thick rulebook and a detailed fine schedule, making it difficult to imagine how both won’t be used to issue a significant penalty this week to St. Louis Rams defensive back Lamarcus Joyner.
Joyner, of course, delivered the illegal shot that knocked Minnesota Vikings quarterback Teddy Bridgewater unconscious Sunday at TCF Bank Stadium. I was shocked at how divided social media was on the play, but there seems no doubt to me that Joyner violated NFL rules protecting players who slide, and his hit caused Bridgewater’s concussion.
Depending on how the NFL classifies the infraction, Joyner will be fined at least $8,681, but likely more. If Bridgewater is deemed to have been a “defenseless player,” a term that seems created for the position he was in, Joyner’s minimum fine will be $23,152. Because he has no known history of such hits, Joyner is unlikely to be suspended.
Teddy Bridgewater
Teddy Bridgewater left Sunday’s game with a concussion after a hit from Lamarcus Joyner.Let’s take a closer look at the play. Bridgewater scrambled 5 yards for a first down and then initiated a feet-first slide with 13 minutes, 18 seconds remaining in the game. Joyner dove at him with his left forearm arched at a 90-degree angle. I received multiple tweets from those who thought Joyner barely made contact, but the replay shows his upper left arm hit Bridgewater’s facemask, causing the helmet to bounce violently off the turf.
Bridgewater was diagnosed with a concussion and must pass through the league’s mandatory concussion protocol in order to be eligible to play in the Vikings’ game Sunday at the Oakland Raiders.
Referee Ronald Torbert penalized Joyner 15 yards for unnecessary roughness, and the rules in this area seem clear. According to Rule 7, Section 2, Article 1 (d)(1), “A defender must pull up when a runner begins a feet-first slide.” The rule goes on to note that contact is legal if a runner has “already committed himself and the contact is unavoidable.” But even in those cases, the rule notes, it is a penalty if “the defender commits some other act, such as helmet-to-helmet contact or by driving his forearm or shoulder into the head or neck area of the runner.”
Joyner told reporters after the game that he had already “launched” when Bridgewater started sliding, a debatable contention. But even if that were the case, the nature of the ensuing contact not only was illegal but also destroyed the precise tenet of the NFL’s campaign to protect quarterbacks who are willing to surrender further yardage in order to avoid big hits.
Whether Joyner intended to hurt Bridgewater is irrelevant, although there was little doubt what Vikings coach Mike Zimmer thought of it. Zimmer noted the “history” of Rams defensive coordinator Gregg Williams, whose theatrics were a major reason the NFL pursued the “Bountygate” investigation against the New Orleans Saints in 2012. At the time, it was reported that Williams encouraged head shots that knocked quarterbacks from the game, an edict that came to be symbolized by a recording in which he told players: “Kill the head, the body will die.”
Independent of whatever philosophies Williams might preach, and regardless of intent, Joyner made a big mistake. He delivered avoidable contact to the head of a player no longer trying to ward it off, causing an injury the NFL wants to prevent at every turn. There is no defending or explaining it, and the league must use its array of disciplinary options to address the infraction.
znModeratorJust to show that it was not a bad decision to go for 2 early in the game. You can criticize Fisher for other decisions but not this.
I agree with that.
Some can say that one thing lost the game, and okay if someone thinks that they think it, but to me what lost the game was when the defense had the Vikes backed up to their own endzone and then committed a series of penalties that let them off the hook.
…
znModeratorHochman: Foles looks like weak link
Benjamin Hochman
MINNEAPOLIS • The truth was in the dare.
“I was telling the boys — ‘Are they serious, do they really want to give us the ball?’” recalled Rams receiver Kenny Britt, in what surely sounded like loquacious squawking.
But they were serious — the Vikings dared Nick Foles to try to beat them with a touchdown … and Nick Foles responded like Nick Foles.
Yup, the Rams signed a guy to be a franchise quarterback, and Rams opponents want him to have the ball in overtime.
Even an overtime win Sunday wouldn’t have masked the overall issue — Foles is flimsy and fallible, and the Rams’ offense has been reduced to surviving with him at the helm.
“I put a lot on myself, and I just have to keep playing better and growing as a quarterback,” he said after going three-and-out in overtime, as his Rams then lost, 21-18, on an ensuing field goal. “We have to get touchdowns, especially on the road. We have to get touchdowns and get in the red zone.”
Ugh, it’s hard to hear that the franchise quarterback, who’s paid as such, needs to continue to grow. But on Sunday, the Rams entered their biggest game since 2006 — they were in the playoff picture, but it appeared they didn’t have a playoff quarterback.
Maybe it’s on the receivers, too. And the offensive line. But Foles infuriates with ill-timed passes and floppy floaters toward St. Paul. From the very first play of the game, when the quarterback missed a preposterously wide-open Britt, Foles didn’t seem all there.
And later, it appeared that even coach Jeff Fisher lacked confidence in Foles.
Down 18-15 late in the fourth, Todd Gurley galloped down field, unleashing a trio of tributes, if you will, to the angry rushing style of Adrian Peterson. The Rams were barely within field goal range. After two more run plays, they faced a third-and-11 play, but Fisher had Foles hand it off to Gurley, setting up a field goal attempt. Somewhere, even Donald Trump was thinking: Man, now that’s conservative.
Of the third-down call, Fisher said: “Big picture, we felt fairly confident that defensively we’d get the ball back and have a chance to win in regulation. And then we missed the kick.”
Greg Zuerlein redeemed himself with a field goal in the final ticks, sending it to overtime.
But then came the game-changing coin toss.
Now, heading into Sunday’s game, the mind wandered.
If the Rams win, they’re 5-3. …
And five of their final eight games are against teams with losing records. …
Could the Rams make the playoffs? …
Could the Rams, just so dominant since the Gurley emergence, actually go to the Super Bowl? All you have to do is get in the tournament. …
Could the NFL owners then have the audacity to allow a Super Bowl team to move to another city?
OK, OK, let’s reel it back in.
The Rams are now 4-4.
And the onus is on Foles to change games with his arm, and not just get through them by not messing up too badly. It’s not working the way it is. He can compliment Gurley, but he must also complement Gurley.
On Sunday, Foles finished 18 for 33 for 168 yards, 55 of those from one deep connection to Britt, which led to the Rams’ lone touchdown. The Rams converted just two third downs, on 16 tries.
Two third downs.
And in the second half as a whole, the Rams only garnered six total first downs.
The Vikings loaded the box on Gurley. The Vikings started sniffing out the handoff to receiver Tavon Austin. The Vikings dared Foles to win it with his arm.
“When it came down to it, we weren’t able to keep drives alive,” Fisher said. “We’re not as productive as we’d like to be on offense.”
In overtime, Fisher didn’t expect Minnesota to kick to the Rams, who would then have to march into the wind. Britt clearly didn’t expect it. Neither did even some of the Vikings.
Asked about the decision, “First thing was — I was surprised,” said Minnesota defensive end Brian Robison. “Second thing was — that tells me he has confidence in us to go get the job done. Any time your coach has that type of confidence in the defense, you don’t want to disappoint.”
Perhaps the Rams win the next two games because the Rams’ next two opponents stink. Maybe two Sundays from now, they’re 6-4 and we’re again talking playoffs. Maybe some weak defenses are all Nick needs to to discover deep-ball braggadocio.
Here’s hoping that Foles finds what he needs to find, because, frankly, it’s been fun talking about the Rams without also having to talk about Los Angeles.
But January looms. Both the playoffs and the owners’ decision.
znModeratorI could not find how many times Foles was hurried or hit this game or for the season. I do know he was sacked once and the Rams are allowing a ~5% sack rate per pass play this year. That is right in the middle for all teams. I would like to know how much of the pressure on Foles is actual vs perceived.
Foles is hit a lot though not sacked much. The problem shows up when you consider the low number of attempts. This does (I think) include today’s game, but he has been sacked 12 times, hit 50 times, and with 222 attempts, that’s a hit/sack rate of 27.9%, which is high. I have no way of ranking it with this game compared to other qbs though, at least not right now.
Source:
These are the numbers BEFORE this game (“DBs” = “dropbacks):
Sks Hts DBs % Team
31 60 265 34.3% Seattle Seahawks
28 57 263 32.3% Tennessee Titans
28 48 271 28.0% San Francisco 49ers
11 41 200 26.0% St. Louis Rams
27 59 331 26.0% Cleveland Browns
20 40 231 26.0% Minnesota Vikings
29 47 299 25.4% Kansas City Chiefs
21 51 285 25.3% Miami Dolphins
14 40 224 24.1% Tampa Bay Buccaneers
20 37 242 23.6% Buffalo Bills
22 60 361 22.7% Detroit Lions
21 34 262 21.0% Pittsburgh Steelers
17 56 350 20.9% Indianapolis Colts
14 30 218 20.2% Green Bay Packers
19 55 373 19.8% San Diego Chargers
19 38 290 19.7% Jacksonville Jaguars
11 41 275 18.9% Arizona Cardinals
18 38 307 18.2% New England Patriots
13 34 260 18.1% Chicago Bears
15 42 327 17.4% Atlanta Falcons
13 28 236 17.4% Dallas Cowboys
13 26 229 17.0% Carolina Panthers
13 34 287 16.4% Philadelphia Eagles
12 33 278 16.2% Denver Broncos
18 37 360 15.3% New Orleans Saints
17 39 379 14.8% Houston Texans
12 32 312 14.1% New York Giants
8 30 277 13.7% Washington Redskins
10 26 270 13.3% Oakland Raiders
14 30 339 13.0% Baltimore Ravens
7 27 264 12.9% New York Jets
9 20 240 12.1% Cincinnati Bengals
znModeratorMistake-prone Rams can’t spring Todd Gurley in loss to Vikings
Nick Wagoner
MINNEAPOLIS — The opportunity for a St. Louis Rams renaissance was there. Entering overtime against the Minnesota Vikings, a team without a winning season in more than a decade stared a prime opportunity to get to 5-3 for the first time since 2003 right in the face. But the Rams couldn’t get out of their own way to make it happen.
The mistake-prone Rams of years gone by showed up again at TCF Bank Stadium, and the result was a 21-18 loss in an eminently winnable game against a Vikings team that also is trying to enjoy a return to the land of success.
After fighting back to tie the game with a 53-yard field goal that sent it to overtime, the Rams had the ball and a chance to win with the Vikings employing backup quarterback Shaun Hill.
Instead, the Rams, who couldn’t get running back Todd Gurley going until it was too late, ran three plays, went backward 6 yards and had to punt. Minnesota promptly moved the ball on the ground with running back Adrian Peterson to set up the winning field goal.
Gurley finished with 24 carries for 89 yards and a touchdown, but against a stacked box for most of the day, there was little room to operate. His 6-yard loss on second down in overtime led to the Rams’ punting from the shadow of their end zone.
Ultimately, the offense couldn’t do enough without Gurley carrying the freight, and the Rams came up short in a game that could have sent a resounding message about their place in the playoff picture.
What it means: At 4-4, the Rams are right on pace for yet another mediocre season under coach Jeff Fisher. Yes, the schedule is light again for the next couple of weeks, but this was a chance to make a statement that it’s time to take the Rams seriously in the NFC.
What were they thinking? On third-and-10 from the Vikings’ 34, the Rams called for a run, clearly settling for a long field goal attempt. Even kicking with the wind, it was too conservative a call to put kicker Greg Zuerlein, who has struggled outdoors, in position to try to tie it from 48 yards. Zuerlein still should have made that kick, but offensive coordinator Frank Cignetti did him no favors on the third-down call.
One reason to panic: You’d think at some point, just based on the law of averages, the Rams would stop being a penalty machine. But it’s what Fisher-coached teams do and it continues to come at a great cost. The Rams had multiple infractions that cost them field position and first downs. They finished with 12 penalties for 87 yards. If this team wants to show it has grown up, it has to cut down on the silly mistakes.
Ouch: The Rams didn’t have any major injury issues during the game, at least none that were evident as it was going on, but they were without some key pieces. End Robert Quinn (knee), safety T.J. McDonald (foot), right tackle Rob Havenstein (ankle) and end Chris Long (knee) did not play after missing most of the practice week.
What’s next: The Rams head back to the Edward Jones Dome to face the Chicago Bears next Sunday.
znModeratorSame Old Reasons Are To Blame For Rams’ Latest Defeat
Bernie Miklasz
http://www.101sports.com/2015/11/09/same-old-reasons-are-to-blame-for-rams-latest-defeat/
When the Rams are at their worst, the underlying reasons are familiar and predictable. The way it all goes down is so numbingly dull, so routine, the Rams can’t even come with new and exciting ways to lose a game. Hey, at least they’re consistent at something.
The Rams formula for frustration should be trademarked by head coach Jeff Fisher.
The specifications include:
— Bad penalties, dumbo penalties, untimely penalties — and a general lack of discipline. These folks commit more errors than Dick Groat (40 for the 1964 baseball Cardinals), and spend more time in the penalty box than Bob Gassoff (306 minutes for the 1975-76 Blues.)
— An offense that would require the navigational assistance of some of history’s greatest explorers — Lewis and Clark, Edmund Hillary, Kurt Warner, Christopher Columbus, Marshall Faulk, Ponce de Leon, Az Hakim, Marco Polo, Isaac Bruce, Ferdinand Magellan, Torry Holt, Amerigo Vespucci, and Ricky Proehl — to reach the end zone on a regular basis.
— A passing game that’s so ineffective, it brings back memories of Steve Pisarkiewicz.
— A success rate in converting third-down plays that’s so poor, it would only be fair to give them five downs, just like the 1990 Colorado Buffaloes in that infamous 1990 game at Mizzou.
These flaws surfaced again Sunday at Minnesota.
In losing to 21-18 to the Vikings in overtime, the Rams mishandled a 15-10 halftime lead, went bankrupt on an opportunity to win a third consecutive game, and squandered the chance to leave the Twin Cities with a 5-3 record. Instead of improving their odds of making the playoffs, the Rams fell to 4-4 and drifted lower in the unofficial NFC wild card standings.
We can point the finger at Fisher’s odd (and failed) decision to go for a two-point conversion after the Rams cut into the Vikings’ 10-lead when Todd Gurley wrestled his way to touchdown run late in the first quarter.
We can be so frustrated by the play calling — and this team’s bizarre refusal to utilize the middle of the field in the passing game — that it makes us want to rub the TV watch-party guacamole in our faces.
We can gripe about the ultra-conservative approach that makes Ted Cruz look a liberal by comparison. (OK, I’m guilty of a mixed sports-politics metaphor there; forgive me but it’s late Sunday night as I write this and my brain is weary.)
And some will even try to blame this on the Rams defense for giving up 21 points, including two red-zone touchdowns on runs by Adrian Peterson and Teddy Bridgewater. The defense could have played better, yes. Their pass-rush pressure was way off. But to dump this on the defense is misplaced. The Rams held the Vikings to a below-average 293 total yards, stopped the home team on 10 of 13 third-down plays, limited Minnesota’s quarterbacks to a 57.5 passer rating, and forced eight punts.
Over the last five-plus NFL seasons, when a visiting team goes into the opponent’s den and gives up exactly 21 points, they’d posted a 21-12 record (.636 winning percentage) through last weekend. While imperfect — and certainly guilty of too many committing knucklehead penalties — the Rams defense wasn’t the culprit here.
Really, this winnable game became an opportunity lost for the same reasons that usually blow up the Rams’ unsteady bandwagon: excessive penalties, an unimaginative and clumsy passing offense, and an incomprehensible third-down futility that’s reached historically low levels.
The Rams were penalized 12 times for 93 yards. I had a feeling this could happen; on Friday, I wrote a warning about the potentially hazardous impact of too many penalties. But this team’s penalty epidemic has been a major detriment since Fisher became coach in 2012. The Rams have been hit with the most penalties (444) in the league since 2012, and the lapses in discipline are often costly.
This was certainly true in Sunday’s game. Of Minnesota’s 21 first downs, six came via Rams penalties. On the two early possessions that produced a 10-0 lead, the Vikings took advantage of four St. Louis penalties. And if you think a high penalty count isn’t a factor in losing football games, I don’t know what to tell you. Well, actually I do. When the Rams have been assessed with at least 10 penalties in a game with Fisher as coach, their record is 3-9-1. And when Rams have been hit with at least 12 penalties in a game under Fisher, they’re 1-6-1.
The offense continues to sputter. The Rams had 14 possessions in Sunday’s defeat, and five of the 14 were three-and-out drives. That makes 27 three-and-outs in 98 possessions this series, a rate (27.5%) that puts them bear the bottom of the NFL. These three-and-outs are killers for obvious reasons — with one being that it gives Gurley fewer opportunities to break off a big run. These aborted drives also put more of a burden on the Rams defense.
The Rams have scored 18 points or fewer in nearly half (46.4%) of Fisher’s 56 games as head coach. And when they max out at 18 points in a game during Fisher’s term, the Rams’ record is 4-22. This is something I’ve been yapping about for quite some time now; you can’t expect to string together wins with an offense that’s so limited in points production. Yeah, you can win games if Gurley is rushing for 140 yards and breaking the opponents’ backs with long runs — especially if the Rams defense is partnering with Gurley to pound the other side with sacks, pressures, negative plays and takeaways. But we have to be realistic about this; it can’t (and won’t) happen in every game. The Rams need to make more plays — first downs and touchdowns — to win more consistently.
The Rams scored one touchdown on their 15 series against Minnesota. Field goals are a nice consolation but can’t match the impact of touchdowns. Through their first eight games, the Rams’ offense has scored 14 touchdowns on 98 possessions for a TD success rate of 14.2 percent. That touchdown efficiency puts the Rams at No. 30 in the NFL rankings.
Not only that, but a Rams’ offense hasn’t scored touchdowns at a lower rate since the 2011 Rams managed a touchdown on only 8.2 percent of their possessions.
So halfway through the 2015 season — and granted, this could improve — this is Fisher’s worst offense for scoring touchdowns since he moved in at Rams Park.
Sunday in Minnesota, the Rams’ followed up on their hopeful 15-point first half by scoring only three more points and accumulating a mere 102 yards of offense over their final eight possessions. Quarterback Nick Foles had only 29 net passing yards after halftime.
After being up 15-10 at the half, and having a chance to expand on their lead, the Rams went flat — with only 48 yards (and five punts) on their first five possessions of the second half.
The Rams intercepted a pass on Minnesota’s first possession of the third quarter — and the Rams offense came onto the field after the takeaway, lost 10 yards, and punted.
In their one shot in overtime, the Rams lost six yards and punted; Minnesota promptly moved in for the winning field goal.
It was another depressing display, but we shouldn’t be surprised by it. The Rams’ offense is averaging 17 points per game this season; only San Francisco has done worse.
This is Fisher’s fourth season here, and he’s never had an offense average more than 17.4 points per game (that, in 2013.) Fisher’s first offense, back in 2012, was also his lowest-scoring offense, averaging 14.8 points per contest. Four years into his program, Fisher’s offense has increased its scoring average by a little more than two points per game. The progress is negligible.
Obviously, the terrible failure to move the chains on third down is paramount in the struggles. After converting only 2 of 16 against the Vikings, the Rams’ third-down success rate for the 2015 slipped to 23.7 percent. This is really awful.
So awful that I went back through the STATS LLC research bank and couldn’t find an NFL offense that had a poorer third-down rate in a season. I had to stop at 1972, because that was the first year STATS tracked the third-down percentages. Among the more recent seasons only San Francisco — 24 percent in 2005 was close — to the Rams’ current futility.
Foles is hardly the only problem on third down. There’s little evidence of creative strategy. The receivers don’t get open. Dropped passes are dropped opportunities. There are too many breakdowns in pass protection.
Statistically Foles is as sorry as any quarterback in the league in third-down passing, completing only 46.4 percent, averaging a dinky 5.31 yards per attempt, and bogged down in a 62.9 passer rating. Only 22.6 percent of his third-down throws have picked up a first down.
(And forget third downs for a moment; Foles had a chance to give the Rams a huge lift early in Sunday’s game, but failed to spot a streaking Kenny Britt downfield to make connections on a likely home-run pass. Foles and the Rams can’t miss on easy chances for big plays. They just can’t.)
And as we mentioned earlier, the Rams simply make themselves easy to defend by declining to utilize the middle of the field when they sling the football. (I’ll post updated numbers on that on Monday.) It makes no sense.
Even with all of the inefficiencies and screw-ups, the Rams were right there on Sunday — having a chance to claim a victory, and I suppose we can draw some hope and optimism from that. But we can’t can’t gloss over the potential repercussions of the Rams’ inability to capture a winnable game. According the site FiveThirtyEight.com, the Rams had a 26 percent chance of making the NFC playoffs before their game with the Vikings. And the loss left them with a 20 percent chance of qualifying for the NFC tournament.
Here’s a rundown of the positioning for the two NFC wild-card spots:
Green Bay and Minnesota are tied for the NFC North lead at 6-2. One will win the division; the other will be relegated to the wild-card pool.
Atlanta is second in the NFC South at 6-3.
St. Louis and Seattle are tied for second in the NFC West at 4-4.
Philadelphia is second in the NFC East at 4-4.
The Rams have to make their move, make up ground, and the upcoming schedule will give them a chance to climb back. But we waste a lot of time talking about hypothetical victories. The truth is, the Rams won’t be able to make a serious run for a playoff ticket unless they clean up their penalty problems, increase their woeful performance on third down, and begin scoring more touchdowns. The Rams are a pretty good team that has to solve some pretty bad problems.
znModerator
znModeratorHe is. IMO? Basically the same reasons as Foles. OL not holding up, out of sync for various reasons, he’s not confident in the offense and is pressing.
I picked quite a week to say that. I just pulled on the Eagles/Dallas game, and Bradford looks good. Throwing those quick release lasers into tight spaces. So he decides to look good on a day when Foles looked bad for quite a few stretches.
znModeratorVikings boot Rams 21-18 in overtime
Jim Thomas
MINNEAPOLIS • This was the chance for the Rams to make a statement. Show that they were capable of stacking wins together. Show they were a maturing, improving team by winning a key November game on the road against a good opponent.
“I’m not into making statements,” coach Jeff Fisher said afterwards. “I’m just into winning games.”
Alas, the Rams did neither Sunday at TCF Bank Stadium. They had several chances to pull out a victory that would’ve put them at 5-3 — or two games above .500 in November for the first time since 2003.
Instead, they fell to 4-4, losing 21-18 to Minnesota on Blair Walsh’s 40-yard field goal with 9 minutes 20 seconds left in overtime.
There was controversy when a sliding Vikings quarterback Teddy Bridgewater was knocked out of the game with a concussion after taking a forearm to the head by Rams nickel back Lamarcus Joyner, who was sliding to prevent contact.
An upset Vikings coach Mike Zimmer called it a cheap shot.
“I would say if we were out on the street, we probably would have had a fight (in response to the play),” Zimmer said.
Joyner, who was flagged for unnecessary roughness on the play, passionately defended himself afterwards.
“I know that guy,” Joyner said. “I grew up across the railroad tracks from him (in Miami). My mom knows his mom. My dad knows his mom. I would never intentionally do a dirty play like that on Teddy Bridgewater.”
But speaking of controversy, let the second-guessing begin on a couple of coaching decisions by Fisher.
First and foremost was the decision to go for 2-points after the Rams scored their one and only touchdown late in the first quarter. Running back Todd Gurley was stopped short of the goal line on the 2-point conversion attempt, so the score at that point was 10-6 Minnesota.
“I felt like we were gonna need as many scoring opportunities as we possibly can,” Fisher said. “And it was indicative of how the wind was. I liked what we had up, and I let the coaches know after I observed the wind.
“It’s a long kick, and (the wind) was pushing the ball around. Whether it worked out or not, I would do it again.”
There was a swirling 18 mph wind, and the new extra-point rule means it’s a 33-yard kick instead of a 20-yarder. Even so, kicker Greg Zuerlein was making kicks from 45 yards into the wind during pre-game warmup.
Obviously, it’s difficult to predict how the game would’ve played out had the Rams simply kicked the extra point there. But in a game that was tied 18-18 at the end of regulation, it was a point that could’ve come in handy.
Then came some conservative play-calling late in the fourth quarter. On a day when Minnesota was stacking the box defensively against Gurley and running room was tough to come by, the Rams sent Gurley up the middle on third-and-11 from the Minnesota 34.
He gained four yards, and then with the wind at his back Zuerlein’s field goal attempt missed wide right from 48 yards with 1 minute 42 seconds to play.
“Big picture, we felt confident defensively that we could get the ball back and have a chance perhaps to win the game in regulation,” Fisher said, when asked why he didn’t throw a pass on third down. “And then we missed the kick.”
Zuerlein did get another crack, and this time his 53-yard field goal as time expired with the wind at his back sent the game into regulation tied at 18-18.
Minnesota won the coin toss in overtime, but instead of taking the ball decided to take the wind. Fisher said he wasn’t expecting that, but it obviously worked out for the Vikings.
Starting overtime at their 20 after the kickoff resulted in a touchback, the Rams lost six yards in three plays. Punter Johnny Hekker knocked the stuffing out of the ball, kicking 63 yards into the wind. But this time, the Rams’ normally strong punt coverage team couldn’t get Vikings return man Marcus Sherels down until he had tight-roped the right sideline for 26 yards to the Minnesota 49.
(Officials missed an illegal block into the back of Rams coverage man Cory Harkey on the play.)
“It was not easy to punt into the wind, and both teams showed that,” Fisher said. “But Johnny hit a great ball, he really hit a tight spiral that pierced the wind. We could’ve flipped the field and we just didn’t get the tackle made.”
With Bridgewater out of the game, the Rams knew the Vikings wouldn’t pass much with backup and former Ram Shaun Hill replacing him at quarterback. Nonetheless, they couldn’t prevent Peterson, who finished with 125 yards on 29 carries, from running the Vikings into field goal range.
Peterson’s 11-yard run on third-and-1 from the St. Louis 42 put the Vikings into range. After three more runs gained nine yards, Walsh blasted the 40-yarder through the uprights — with the wind at his back — giving the Vikings (6-2) their fourth consecutive victory.
“I’m disappointed for our guys,” Fisher said. “Losses are one thing; to overcome losses are another. You know you have your work cut out coming back off these, so we definitely have our work cut out this week. But I’ve got a lot of respect and confidence in our guys that we’ll bounce right back.”
Gurley held under 100 yards for the first time as an NFL starter, finishing with 89 yards on 24 carries and a touchdown. Tavon Austin was effective on the end-around with 66 yards on eight carries. But once again, the Rams couldn’t get much going in the passing game, with Nick Foles completing 18 of 33 passes for 168 yards and a 68.8 passer rating.
Zuerlein kicked four field goals, all when he had the wind at his back, including a franchise-record 61-yarder early in the second quarter.
znModeratorMike Zimmer calls out Rams DC Gregg Williams after hit on QB Bridgewater
Ben Goessling
ESPN.comMINNEAPOLIS — Vikings coach Mike Zimmer did little to hide his feelings about the Rams’ defensive style of play Sunday, calling the hit that knocked quarterback Teddy Bridgewater out of the game a cheap shot in his postgame news conference.
Zimmer said the Rams went too far and pointed the finger at defensive coordinator Gregg Williams.
“I agree that it was a cheap shot,” Zimmer said on KFAN-FM, adding, “[Gregg Williams’] defenses are all like that.”
Bridgewater left the game with a concussion when St. Louis cornerback Lamarcus Joyner hit him in the fourth quarter, and he will have to clear the NFL’s concussion protocol to return for next Sunday’s game against the Oakland Raiders. Bridgewater appeared to be in good spirits in the locker room after Minnesota’s 21-18 win, but he had to be replaced by Shaun Hill. After the Vikings won the game in overtime, Zimmer kept walking as he quickly shook Rams coach Jeff Fisher’s hand.
“I didn’t have much to say to him,” Zimmer said in his postgame news conference. Then, when asked about the response of his players to the hit, the coach said, “If we were out in the street, we probably would’ve had a fight.”
Asked about the postgame handshake, Fisher said, “It was really quick, yeah. We’re not out to hurt anybody. It’s unfortunate. Teddy is playing really well, and Shaun came in and found a way to win a game for them. But it’s just part of the game. I’m disappointed that he went out, and I hope that he returns to play as soon as he can.”
Joyner said he did not try to hurt Bridgewater, adding: “I know that guy. I grew up across the railroad tracks from him. My mom knows his mom. My dad knows his mom. I would never intentionally do a dirty play like that on Teddy Bridgewater.
“It was a bam-bam play. He’s a taller stature guy compared to me, I did not know he was fixing to slide. When I launched, he slid and we connected. If I could take it back, personally, I will take it back because I’m not a dirty player. I wouldn’t want to take joy from his mom or his team. So was it intentional? Not at all. I can’t fix the problem with what’s going on and how they feel, but how I feel inside is not good.”
“
If we were out in the street, we probably would’ve had a fight.”- Vikings coach Mike Zimmer on his players’ reaction to the Rams’ hit on Teddy Bridgewater
A league source told ESPN.com Bridgewater was feeling good after the game, adding the quarterback was out to dinner with people close to him.On the series before Bridgewater was injured, he also took a low hit from Rams defensive end William Hayes, who was not called for a penalty because Bridgewater was out of the pocket when Hayes hit him.
Williams’ name already draws a strong reaction in Minnesota stemming from his role in the New Orleans Saints’ “Bountygate” scandal, which peaked in the 2010 NFC Championship Game when Saints players angered the Vikings with a number of low hits on quarterback Brett Favre. The game helped trigger an NFL investigation into the Saints’ conduct, and Williams was suspended for the 2012 NFL season.
Asked if the Rams were targeting Bridgewater on Sunday, Zimmer said: “I don’t know about that. I do know there is a history there with their defensive coordinator. I’ll leave it at that.
-
AuthorPosts

