Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 37,501 through 37,530 (of 47,810 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: reporters & analysts autopsy the GIANTS game #56100
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Five Takeaways: Rams 17-10 loss to Giants

    Myles Simmons

    http://www.therams.com/news-and-events/article-1/Five-Takeaways-Rams-17-10-loss-to-Giants/8f2a9ddc-2c1e-45a3-80fc-447c3db5680a

    After a long flight home following 10 days on the road, the Rams find themselves 3-4 and on a three-game losing streak heading into their bye week. With many in the Los Angeles locker room intimating the club will use the extra preparation time to reflect, recharge, and regroup, here are five takeaways from the Rams’ 17-10 loss to the Giants in London.

    1) Turnovers hurt

    While Los Angeles capitalized on an early takeaway — turning defensive back Lamarcus Joyner’s forced fumble into a touchdown — the club ended up behind in the turnover margin once again in this loss. While the box score gives those interceptions to quarterback Case Keenum, head coach Jeff Fisher stated both Sunday and Monday that they are not all on the signal-caller.

    “At first glance, if you look, [you say], ‘Oh, he threw four interceptions,’” Fisher said. “You look at the actual plays, and as you guys know, interceptions — you can place blame wherever you want.”

    For two examples, Keenum’s first interception — returned for a touchdown by safety Landon Collins — went off of wide receiver Tavon Austin’s hands. And Keenum’s final interception came in large part because of a missed check at the line with wide receiver Brian Quick.

    “Just a miscommunication,” Quick said of the play after the game. “It just happened between us and the quarterback.”

    “I was just trying to get Brian a chance in the back of the end zone,” Keenum said Sunday. “But I didn’t signal it well enough. So we’re on the same page, and I’ve gotta give our guys a chance.”

    The Rams’ turnovers were certainly key to the outcome of the game, as the club did come out ahead in several key aspects. L.A. tallied 345 total yards, 20 first downs, 35:05 in time of possession, and finished 9-of-19 in third-down efficiency.

    “You look at a 17-10 game, and you turn the ball over four times on offense, something’s going well for you — and that was the defensive effort and the special team effort,” Fisher said. “But we just couldn’t overcome the turnovers.”

    Indeed, in the Rams’ four losses this season, they have come out behind in the turnover margin. In their three wins, they’ve come out ahead.

    2) Sticking with Keenum

    With Fisher saying he didn’t feel Keenum was the reason for the Rams’ three straight losses, it’s not too much of a surprise that he’s also stated that Keenum will continue as Los Angeles’ starting quarterback.

    “I have not changed my mindset whatsoever with respect to Case and Jared,” Fisher said Monday, referring to the Rams’ No. 1 overall pick Jared Goff. “Jared is going to be our starter [eventually], but we’re going to continue with Case.”

    This week will provide Goff with an opportunity to take some more reps in practice. While Fisher has said Goff gets reps here and there during a regular practice week, there aren’t many opportunities to put the rookie behind center when preparing to win on Sunday. Of course, that isn’t the case this week.

    “I don’t feel like Case needs the reps Wednesday and early next week,” Fisher said. “So, Jared will get those reps, which is good.”

    Fisher also said young players like wideouts Pharoh Cooper and Nelson Spruce should be able to get reps this week.

    3) Defense bounces back

    Los Angeles’ defense had a tough two-game stretch against Buffalo and Detroit, but bounced back nicely with a strong performance against the Giants. The unit allowed only 10 points, as New York scored a touchdown off an interception. And Joyner forced a fumble on the Giants’ second play from scrimmage, which cornerback E.J. Gaines recovered to start his strong day.

    The Rams’ defense allowed just 196 yards passing on 37 attempts from quarterback Eli Manning. Famed wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr. was largely quiet on Sunday as well, with only five receptions for 49 yards.

    “We challenged ourselves,” Joyner said. “We just had to challenge ourselves and prove ourselves the point that we can compete in this league as a secondary.”

    “Well, our goal going in was to be better in the run game, and was to take away the deep throws. And be very much aware of where Odell lined up. And we did so,” Fisher said Sunday.

    4) A need to eliminate mental mistakes

    Part of the issue with Los Angeles has been a lack of consistency and mental errors. Whether it’s penalties or otherwise, those are factors that the Rams must clean up as they begin the second half of the season.

    Running back Todd Gurley called for reflection after the game, saying members of the Rams must ask themselves, “are you helping, or are you hurting the team? It’s as simple as that. Mental mistakes, we can’t have. From everybody.

    “It’s football,” Gurley added. “We’ve been doing this our whole life. Can’t be shooting ourselves in the foot.”

    Asked as a follow-up how he feels he’s been doing himself, Gurley said, “You know, some games I’m hurting myself. Some games I feel like I’m doing as much as I can. And I don’t think it’s — It’s definitely not effort, because everybody, we love this game. And we want to win.

    “But we just have to do the little things. The simple things,” Gurley continued. “Football is the only sport you have — I don’t know, there might be other sports — but you practice every day. You know what I’m saying? You practice every day. You play one game a week, and you practice every day. So you shouldn’t even” — the running back snapped his fingers — “when the game comes, it should be second nature.”

    Those words, however, don’t constitute finger pointing. As Gurley said before, it’s about getting better as a collective unit.

    “We lost the game. Penalties happened, turnovers happened, all of that stuff happened. But you’ve got to move on from this and stay together,” Gurley said. “When times get rough, everybody goes to pointing fingers in the locker room, media, whatever it is. So we’re on the field together so we’ve just got to stay together.”

    5) Plan for the bye week

    Younger players getting reps in practice means some of the more veteran players will be able to get some needed rest for the week and the weekend.

    “Everybody has different needs and I think that’s the most important thing, is you address the needs. We have guys that need to rest, we have guys that need some work,” Fisher said. “This week is about resting, it’s about recovering – which we say all the time – it’s also about getting away and coming back recharged, that’s probably the most important thing.”

    Fisher added the Rams have a chance to get some players back after the bye, which would put the club in good shape for Week 9.

    “We have a chance to be extremely healthy, if you compare the roster after this bye week to the start of the regular season, so that’s encouraging,” Fisher said. “We’re going to work hard over the next couple of days, as staff – looking at what’s been good and what’s not, where we need to improve. I think realistically, when the guys come back after the bye week, we’ll have a couple of good days of work and then we’ll get ready for the Panthers.”

    in reply to: I am enjoying the heck out of this board #56054
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I don’t even like pie.

    Where is the ice cream?

    Dammit, I hate pot lucks.

    You know there are people in China who cannot even pronounce the word “potluck” properly.

    So be grateful for what you have.

    ..

    in reply to: I am enjoying the heck out of this board #56052
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jeezus, people — this is pumpkin pie time. Halloween is Pumpkin pie time.

    Thanksgiving is Apple pie

    Dutch Apple is what you want.

    Emma Stoltzfus was fantastic as Reno–the saucy dame in the play

    Emma Stoltzfus is a no-talent hack

    I agree with all that.

    Though, DV is just a figurehead. Or figure of speech. One of the 2.

    ..

    in reply to: Tell me why. Why? #56051
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    CK has been a big culprit but TG has dropped it c acouple of times and TA gave the D a tip drill INT so…it’s been a team thing with CK leading the pack.

    To me this is still the running game. CK is not supposed to be leading a passing attack. He is supposed to be game managing a running offense combined with a tough defense.

    If CK were starter material born to lead passing attacks for a run-less team with up and down defense, then, he would already be someone else’s starter before this.

    He’s supposed to be a good game manager plus intangibles. We know he’s not clutch enough (though he has done it a couple of times) and so we know he can’t win shoot-outs. But then they weren’t supposed to be IN shoot-outs.

    CK as a game manager on a running team would be more than just fine IMO…it would be enough to win, a lot.

    So I hope they fix the run game somehow during the bye.

    .

    in reply to: Tell me why. Why? #56040
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    nor this year in any of the past 3 games where he was in position to deliver.

    To be fair though it’s not as bad as that. The go-ahead score coming from behind against Tampa came at the end of the 3rd quarter. The go-ahead score to come from behind against Arizona was at the end of the 4th.

    in reply to: GIANTS game reactions #56026
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    i am concerned however that fisher has lost the team somehow. when players are making dumb mistakes every week.

    When Linehan lost the team, we knew it. There was no doubt. You could see things; things were said. This does not look like that and this does not sound like that.

    Think who is making dumb mistakes. Britt? He has barely reached the stage where we could say his head was right…that’s new to him. Quick? We thought he had turned the corner but then turns out he just hesitated at the corner and looked the right direction.

    I don’t think that’s fair to say about Quick at all…and Britt for that matter.

    The receivers are having the best year they have had in years…same guys, what’s different?

    I think the new “O by GroH” is having an effect and the receivers are actually getting a chance to catch it and not worry about getting blown up as soon as they catch it….that leads to higher reception rate and lower dropped passes rate.

    The problem with the O is they still haven’t gotten (is that a word?) the running game on the tarmac let alone lift off. Why is that? I haven’t put my finger on it yet but mulling it over.

    I agree with you about the year in general, and about Groh’s influence. I think that’s all true.

    And still, given all that, all 3 of them still F’ed up in that game. It’s really startling in fact to see 3 WRs screw up in one game so badly.

    in reply to: Who would you hire to replace Fisher? #56020
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Who would you like to see, if Fisher is not resigned? Meaning Fisher and his staff will be looking for a new job elsewhere at the end of the 2016 season.

    First of all to answer that question, I can only say IF they are all looking. I am not as certain as you are that that will happen.

    So, IF…how do I answer? The truth?

    Well….I have no more idea than anyone else does.

    The difference is, I am not going to chase names and act like I have an idea.

    As I said, you can listen to the press and to posters talk about a draft. There’s some real knowledge there. On coaching hires? The press and posters alike basically have no idea. And over the years, the ones who sounded the most definitive and confident in their talk about that have been just as wrong as everyone else.

    I promise though not to rain on any parades and I will repeat this particular mantra only when
    asked.

    .

    in reply to: Fisher says blame Rams receivers for interceptions #56019
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Quick has been having a great year and was lights out against the Giants, sans what he’s being accused of. You don’t bench a guy that is actually helping your team. Quick is a handful for the defenders and is actually catching the ball.

    Britt is on pace to have over 1,000 yards are you gonna replace a legit #1 receiver and keep a back-up QB on the field?

    Tavon just signed a 40 Million dollar contract then you bench him? I don’t think so

    Well he wasn’t serious about the benching talk. If you heard it, it was delivered as a toss-off remark. He was basically saying, I put more blame on the WRs, that game was not the qb’s fault.

    And in fact all 3 guys you name mammothly F’ed up in that game. Tavon led to the pick 6, Britt dogged it on a route where he could have had a long TD, and Quick did not register the signal for the audible, leading him to run the wrong route and give the defense an easy pop-up INT instead of a possible TD.

    They played well against Detroit then those three all acted like they had been enjoying london more than getting ready to play.

    I would imagine if either Spruce or Cooper were ready you could bench any single one of them.

    But again Fisher was not saying that in any serious way. It was, bench the qb? Naw I would bench one of the WRs for screwing up before benching the qb.

    Fisher RARELY directly calls out a player in a press conference and in that one he called out both Britt and Quick.

    And I agree with him.

    .

    in reply to: Who would you hire to replace Fisher? #56000
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    All that being said, ZN, who do you REALLY want to take over after Fisher?

    i dont know i cant think that many years ahead…(nyuk nyuk nyuk).
    .

    in reply to: Who would you hire to replace Fisher? #55999
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’m going to be very blunt here, and I don’t mean to offend anyone. It’s just my 2 cents.

    Along with thinking that firing Fisher would be a mistake…

    …I know this is just me and I won’t fight about it and campaign and so on, but I have found over the years that “which coach to hire” discussions among fans on the net are pretty much useless. No one knows enough to offer anything more than superficial and/or quirky ideas. The ones who insist they know more are invariably no better than people who just wing it for the sake of conversation.

    In fact if we all put up our old “who to hire” posts from years past again, it would make for good comic relief. With no exceptions. The same goes with the talking heads and sports writers we get our info on this from. I doubt there is a single journalist out there with a credible “hit” record when it comes to guessing who would make a consistent winning head coach.

    Don’t take that personally. It’s just that no one is in a position to know enough, and even those who are in the league and in a position to know enough get it wrong far more often than not.

    Well of course they are useless. None of us has any say over who the next coach will be if there even is to be a new coach. It’s just interesting to hear what people’s thoughts on the matter are – in the same vein as “who do you think the Rams should draft with their first pick?” or “which film should win the Oscar for best picture?”

    well discussions about draft picks are based on real knowledge…coach hire discussion are nowhere near as informed as those are

    in reply to: reporters & analysts autopsy the GIANTS game #55990
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    i don’t like that bonsignore article. i don’t know how starting keenum doesn’t have the long term picture in my mind. in fact. one could say he did have the long term picture in my mind by giving goff time to acclimate himself to the nfl. it also seems like he’s trying to put all the blame on keenum without giving context to those 4 interceptions.

    and while i am in favor of starting goff after the bye (as long as he is ready). after thinking about it i don’t see how it benefits the rams in any way for fisher to declare goff the starter right after the giants loss. except for to take some heat off himself for the next 2 weeks. fisher has long been touted as a players’ coach. i don’t see any selfishness in this at all. maybe i’m reading it wrong.

    i think there are a lot of things you can criticize fisher on. i think some of the personnel decisions have been questionable. i’m beginning to wonder his ability to get his players ready for a game. but i don’t think you can call him selfish. or that he’s holding goff back as a way to preserve his job.

    I agree. He is imputing motives that he can’t possibly know. And he clearly is just seeing what he wants to see.

    Because one could just as easily put forward a case that starting Goff would be self-preservation. If the Rams win with Goff, Fisher is a genius. If they lose with Goff, he’s a rookie QB who came from a system that did not prepare him for the NFL, and he’s only learning, so he needs more time to develop. Therefore it isn’t Fisher’s fault.

    Furthermore, Bonsignore accuses Fisher of blaming everyone but himself, but at the same time argues that Fisher should have thrown Keenum under the bus and announced Goff is starting. But Fisher didn’t blame Keenum. And it’s good that he didn’t demote him on the spot because throwing a QB under the bus like that isn’t good for morale in the locker room.

    What’s more, he is assuming that the W-L record is what Stan is going to look at when the Fisher contract has to be determined, as if that is the only relevant consideration. And he is assuming the Rams would lose more with Goff than Keenum.

    In the end, one could argue either way with Keenum and Goff, and one could argue either way which QB would most likely preserve Fisher’s career, so the interpretation and motives one chooses to accept as “reality” doesn’t reveal anything about the Rams, Goff, or Fisher, but only that person’s opinion of Fisher.

    IMO you guys nailed it completely.

    That’s just a ridiculously bad article. Miklasz with an agenda level bad.

    .

    in reply to: Fisher exposed #55989
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    he’s a rookie. he looks that bad. it’s the same difference.

    really. it’s the same thing.

    No it’s not the same thing old friend. If you say he’s a rookie than it’s all normal and par for the course.

    If you say he looks bad that means he’s not even developing at the normal rate for a rookie.

    If you just meant he’s a rookie and rookies are rookies, then, yeah, I am with you.

    in reply to: Fisher exposed #55984
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    right. meaning goff doesn’t look that good right now.

    which is fine. he can sit. doesn’t mean he can’t start in the future.

    but if he does look that good. right now. then you do.

    but if he’s gonna try and win now with this cast then i don’t know what he’s doing. this defense. this running game. not good enough. and that’s what keenum needs to succeed. he doesn’t have that. so if he’s in win now mode with keenum. with this cast. then he’s stupid.

    No. It doesn’t mean that about Goff. It means he looks like a rookie—and the VAST majority of rookie qbs struggle. That’s throughout NFL history. The numbers on that are overwhelming.

    So if you start a rookie qb, you are accepting your lumps. So you choose between that and win now mode.

    Coach made his choice. You prefer another. I promise that’s all this is.

    In terms of win now, then, you are just more despairing than he is. Which I like. I don’t like a coach who gives up.

    They can win with this cast and in fact have proven they can. Fisher’s idea is to use the bye to fix certain things, and why not. The defense was different after the Detroit game. The receivers were better in the Detroit game which means they can do it. Coach thinks he can use the bye to improve the running game.

    I reject any hyperbolic over-reaction such as “he’s stupid.” To me, that’s just your frustration talking. (Which is fine, talk away. We just see it differently.)

    .

    in reply to: Fisher exposed #55981
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    and keenum really is irrelevant in this case. it’s really just about moving on and investing in your future. if he’s improving as they say he is.

    That’s one view. But the coach has a different view. The coach’s view is, we’re still in win now.

    It really does amount to 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.

    Because no matter what anyone says, the truth is (yes Mr. It’s All Opinions said “the truth is”), there is absolutely no credible argument that states one way of bringing along a qb is superior to another.

    We’ve seen qbs develop from being on the sidelines long before they start. That’s true of all NFL history.

    We’ve seen qbs develop by taking their lumps and getting live reps.

    We’ve also seen both methods fail (more often than not in fact).

    So it gets down to the coach’s decision as to whether he wants to go with win now.

    You may not like that call, but it’s a perfectly valid call.

    in reply to: Who would you hire to replace Fisher? #55977
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is just a lite and silly thread.

    So get with it.

    w
    v

    Well on this, I am what they call “diversity.”

    in reply to: Fisher exposed #55974
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    keenum threw 43 passes in the fourth quarter against just 10 in the first three?

    that’s just weird. the more and more i think about it goff should be starting.

    him not starting means either.

    fisher is dumb.

    or.

    goff looks that bad.

    Or it;s Fisher doesn;t think Goff is ready and he doesn’t blame Keenum for the loss. Plus his priority is fixing the running game since the team was built around it and without that a lot of things are “off” right now. He also thinks they’re still in it and is staying in “win now” mode.

    There’s no “Fisher dumb” or “Goff looks bad” about it.

    in reply to: Who would you hire to replace Fisher? #55972
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’m going to be very blunt here, and I don’t mean to offend anyone. It’s just my 2 cents.

    Along with thinking that firing Fisher would be a mistake…

    …I know this is just me and I won’t fight about it and campaign and so on, but I have found over the years that “which coach to hire” discussions among fans on the net are pretty much useless. No one knows enough to offer anything more than superficial and/or quirky ideas. The ones who insist they know more are invariably no better than people who just wing it for the sake of conversation.

    In fact if we all put up our old “who to hire” posts from years past again, it would make for good comic relief. With no exceptions. The same goes with the talking heads and sports writers we get our info on this from. I doubt there is a single journalist out there with a credible “hit” record when it comes to guessing who would make a consistent winning head coach.

    Don’t take that personally. It’s just that no one is in a position to know enough, and even those who are in the league and in a position to know enough get it wrong far more often than not.

    in reply to: GIANTS game reactions #55946
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    i am concerned however that fisher has lost the team somehow. when players are making dumb mistakes every week.

    When Linehan lost the team, we knew it. There was no doubt. You could see things; things were said. This does not look like that and this does not sound like that.

    Think who is making dumb mistakes. Britt? He has barely reached the stage where we could say his head was right…that’s new to him. Quick? We thought he had turned the corner but then turns out he just hesitated at the corner and looked the right direction.

    in reply to: GIANTS game reactions #55943
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    If your players that have been together a while now are still not communicating properly in the 7th game don’t point at them, either coach them up or get rid of them and bring in teachable players put your fucking finger away.

    When he said that about the receivers, he was standing up for Keenum. That’s all that was.

    Maybe Zn but there’s a weird dynamic there and it’s not the first time he’s done this. He could have accepted the blame himself and protected all the players but he as he has done time after time singled out one particular group . Add to that two int’s were absolutely horrible throws and some of the completions exposed the wrs to vicious hits. The guy is a turnover machine. Then throw in Wentz making the entire organization look like imbeciles today. Watching this team is like going to the dentist hungover.

    He directly did say, in the actual press-conference and not the selected quoted bits, that the coaches have to do a better job.

    I don;t see the weird stuff you see. We just differ on that. Ain’t board warrin over it or nothin … we’re just sittin in different rooms on that one.

    ….

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I may be changing my mind.

    In the press conference… Fisher flat-out says Goff will play when he’s ready.

    I have no reason to doubt the coaches on that.

    the vid: http://theramshuddle.com/topic/fisher-postgame-1023-vid-link/

    in reply to: Fisher postgame, 10/23 … vid link #55940
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is pretty must-listen.

    IMO.

    .

    in reply to: GIANTS game reactions #55938
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Zack let me ask you something — if Fisher goes 7 and 9 this year, with Keenum,
    would you consider firing him at the end of the year? (If you had the power)

    w
    v

    Honestly it depends. I don’t think the mere record tells me anything. Why did they go 7-9? And I balance that against all the players signed to longer contracts who fit their particular system only…like Barron and Austin. It would be a tough call but it would depend on the major reason (or reasons) for going 7-9. All that’s balanced though by this…there’s no such thing as a Fisher diehard. I think most people, even those who defend him now, would be fine with a change IF the change is a good one.

    in reply to: GIANTS game reactions #55936
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    If your players that have been together a while now are still not communicating properly in the 7th game don’t point at them, either coach them up or get rid of them and bring in teachable players put your fucking finger away.

    When he said that about the receivers, he was standing up for Keenum. That’s all that was.

    in reply to: Fisher says blame Rams receivers for interceptions #55931
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Eventually, the team is going to get sick of Fisher, to the point, where it will not be a shock to see the players quit on him.

    I don’t see that happening. At all. Unlike some of us, the players wouldn’t blame him for everything. But that’s just my version of guessing/mindreading to balance your version.

    I’m saying that Fisher is deflecting blame off himself. Fisher is basically saying he didn’t do anything wrong.

    Show me examples of coaches who do say they did something wrong.

    See, fans have this weird idea that (1) what’s in their heads must be real, (2) therefore the coach must see it that way too, and (3) therefore if he doesn’t say it he’s deflecting blame.

    I don’t know why you have this thing that says, basically, he must be accountable to me, which means, he must say what I personally think is true or he’s evading it.

    The reality never works that way.

    ..

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PA RAM: Dammit I broke the eggs! Now what?
    ZN: Make scrambled eggs.

    Absolutely not! I will only eat eggs in the shells. If I can’t have them in the shells I will make the switch to pancakes. Maybe it’s time to turn to pancakes. Trying to pick up the broken shells from that gooey mess never goes well.

    But okay–I will stick with the broken shells for now. It isn’t their fault anyway. The pot I was going to boil them in ran the wrong route. I’ll replace the pot before I replace the eggs.

    Author’s Note: Sometimes I read something I’ve just written and I think: what the hell was I smoking? This is one of those times. Carry on.

    I’m sorry to ruin your pie in the sky “imagine all the people” dreamworld there, but, … pancake batter includes eggs. Yep, eggs whipped right in. Without the shells. In fact as a rule pancakes are far better without the egg shells. Granted, not as nutritious, but still.

    in reply to: Fisher says blame Rams receivers for interceptions #55921
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Eventually, the team is going to get sick of Fisher, to the point, where it will not be a shock to see the players quit on him.

    I don’t see that happening. At all. Unlike some of us, the players wouldn’t blame him for everything. But that’s just my version of guessing/mindreading to balance your version.

    in reply to: Fisher says blame Rams receivers for interceptions #55916
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    i like keenum. he’s falling on the grenade as a leader should.

    as far as the ints go, the receivers should be getting their asses chewed out. pay attention! especially on that last possession. good grief.

    ————-

    The thing i want to know is — Is this offensive communication stuff “correctable”. Or not.
    I mean they changed some stuff on offense, so is this just ‘learning curve’ stuff that they will at some point improve on? Or is this just bad coaching or players with low-football-IQs ?

    The WRs looked really good last week. This week it was up and down.

    And what will Goff bring to this offense?

    w
    v

    Near as we know, there was this one mammoth F-up on this play.

    And that goes to Brian Quick.

    Not sure why there’s this endlessly widening circle of blame with that.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    If Goff plays at least as well as Keenum people will call Fisher an idiot for not getting him in there sooner.

    When all you see is darkness, light a candle.

    For example. If Goff plays as well as Keenum then it’s easy enough to say good, finally…he’s ready. It was wise to let him wait.

    PA RAM: Dammit I broke the eggs! Now what?
    ZN: Make scrambled eggs.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: reporters & analysts autopsy the GIANTS game #55899
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    GIANTS’ 4 INTERCEPTIONS KEY IN 17-10 WIN OVER RAMS IN LONDON

    http://www.grandrapidsmn.com/around_the_web/sports/giants-interceptions-key-in—win-over-rams-in/article_0ee102c4-a924-5471-8a91-302f8a9237df.html

    LONDON (AP) — The New York Giants capitalized on four interceptions of Case Keenum to defeat the Los Angeles Rams 17-10 Sunday in the first NFL game played at London’s home of English rugby, a sold-out and raucous Twickenham Stadium.

    Keenum, coming off the best start of his career, had the Rams at the Giants’ 15-yard line with 50 seconds left when he lobbed a pass in the left corner of the end zone that Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie easily picked off. Keenum’s intended target, Brian Quick, failed to get the quarterback’s audible and cut off his route early.

    Keenum, who finished 32 of 53 for 291 yards and one touchdown, has thrown an interception on the Rams’ final offensive play of the last three games. That likely will fuel debate on a potential quarterback change to overall No. 1 draft pick Jared Goff.

    Fisher said he had no intention of switching quarterbacks during the bye week.

    “The windows are tight and the throws have to be more precise,” Fisher said of Keenum’s throws. “I’ll make changes at receiver before I make a change at quarterback.”

    The win kept the Giants (4-3) in good shape in the ultra-competitive NFC East, where no one has a losing record. The Rams (3-4) lost their third straight.

    The Giants entered Sunday with the worst turnover differential in the NFC at minus-10. Then tight end Larry Donnell coughed up the ball on the Giants 35, leading to the Rams’ lone touchdown, a 10-yard grab by Tavon Austin.

    But the Rams were unable to build on that early edge and instead hit the self-destruct button. Keenum threw two interceptions, both off high-sailing deflections, to safety Landon Collins, and two more in the end zone to cornerback Rodgers-Cromartie. RB Todd Gurley struggled, carrying 15 times for 57 yards, his longest run an 8-yarder.

    Collins returned his first pick 44 yards for a second-quarter touchdown, making several Rams miss tackles before he bowled over center Tim Barnes to draw the Giants even.

    “I must have run at least 100 yards on that play,” said a beaming Collins, who until Sunday had only one interception in his two-year career.

    Collins’ second pick set up the winning drive, which featured a 22-yard catch by Odell Beckman Jr. to the Rams 6. Rashad Jennings scored from the 1 for the Giants’ only offensive touchdown.

    Eli Manning had a pedestrian day, going 24 of 37 for 196 yards and no touchdowns. The Rams managed 20 first downs to the Giants’ 13.

    Manning said the pass rush and multiple coverage looks meant it was “tough to get into a great rhythm and hit a bunch of big plays.”

    “It’s not one that we’re necessarily going to put on our highlight tape of how we’re supposed to win games, but it’s a team game,” Jennings said. “The defense bailed us out.”

    The Rams’ final two possessions ended in the end-zone interceptions by Rodgers-Cromartie, the pro-Giants crowd of more than 74,000 roaring their approval.

    HOME-FIELD ADVANTAGE?

    Los Angeles was the home team, but officials struggled to whip up a pro-Rams environment at Twickenham, where the big-screen TVs advised “Quiet please, offense at work” when the Rams had the ball — and the crowd kept up a deafening din during the Rams’ two doomed final drives.

    LOPSIDED START

    The Giants took the field looking jet-lagged, Rams the savvy travelers. That perhaps reflected the fact Los Angeles chose to fly overnight from Detroit the previous Sunday for a full week in England, while the Giants did most of their preparations at home before arriving Friday in London.

    The Giants gained a single first down in the first quarter on an 11-yard completion to Sterling Shepard. The Rams, by contrast, controlled 11:36 of the first-quarter clock, gained seven first downs with a balanced attack, and scored on their first two drives to lead 10-0 with less than 10 minutes gone.

    GIANTS RUNNING WOES

    New York struggled for a seventh straight week to move the ball on the ground and Giants finished with 36 yards rushing on 20 carries for a paltry 1.8 average.

    GIANTS KICKER

    New Giants kicker Robbie Gould made a 29-yard field goal in his only attempt and converted two extra points. He replaced Josh Brown, who was placed on the NFL’s commissioner exemption list after more information surfaced about his abusive behavior toward his then-wife.

    Gould, cut by the Bears in September, got the surprise recruitment call Thursday as he was taking his 3-year-old son swimming. Their first question: Did he have a valid passport?

    “Getting a fresh start and being in a place like New York and playing for the Giants, as one of the charter franchises, is something special,” he said.

    INJURY SCARE

    Giants kick returner Dwayne Harris suffered what looked like a serious injury when returning the final punt of the first half. He lay still on the ground for several minutes, was immobilized and carted off the field as teammates prayed. But he returned to field the first punt of the fourth quarter. Neither team reported any other serious injuries.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Software malfunction won’t let me move threads right now. Yours gets precedence.

    Lot of discussion of this on this and other boards.

    I say three losses is enough…Keenum cant carry a team with (more) iffy (than it should be) defense and with a stalled running game. So might as well drop the rookie out of the helocopter into the atlantic and see if he can swim.

    Will they? I think they will. Keenum didnt melt down like Davis then Foles, but, if you can’t win with him might as well get Goff going.

Viewing 30 posts - 37,501 through 37,530 (of 47,810 total)