Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 11,821 through 11,850 (of 12,315 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Les Snead on the Jeff Fisher Show –Audio & Video #9741
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Snead wants them to be more
    ’emotionally intelligent’

    w
    v

    in reply to: Seahawks favored by 75 #9721
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I might have put some money on the rams if it was 75 lol. But I’d have to think about it.

    Heck i guess I’m a dreamer,
    cause I’d put money on the Rams
    if it was 55. Maybe even 45.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Austin Davis #9718
    Avatar photowv
    Participant
    in reply to: Beyond freaking belief…9ers game reactions thread #9710
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams stepped in it last night. Looked like they were either horribly out coached or quit in the second half. Neither shines favorably on Fisher. Another top five pick. I watched Mariotta and Hundley on Saturday – came away feeling meh?

    The ode to the 99 team was nice but it seemed like a farewell to St Louis as much as an honor.

    So, I’m curious who’s getting paid more to force the Rams to move to LA – the refs, Kroenke, or Fisher.

    wv-mom asked me today,
    “why are you still a rams fan?”

    i tried to explain to her
    that the Steelers once went 25 years
    without a playoff appearance.

    she just rolled her eyes

    w
    v
    wiki:
    “…The Steelers’ history of bad luck changed with the hiring of coach Chuck Noll for the 1969 season. Noll’s most remarkable talent was in his draft selections, taking Hall of Famers “Mean” Joe Greene in 1969, Terry Bradshaw and Mel Blount in 1970, Jack Ham in 1971, Franco Harris in 1972,[13] and finally, in 1974, pulling off the incredible feat of selecting four Hall of Famers in one draft year, Lynn Swann, Jack Lambert, John Stallworth, and Mike Webster.[14] The Pittsburgh Steelers’ 1974 draft was their best ever; no other team has ever drafted four future Hall of Famers in one year, and only very few (including the 1970 Steelers) have drafted two or more in one year…”

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: What's missing? Responsibility #9704
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Lloyd was burning up the league
    before that 80 yarder, i see:

    Zero receptions in game one.
    One reception in game 2
    Two in game 3
    Three in game four.
    And one in the ram game.

    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/L/LloyBr00.htm

    w
    v

    in reply to: What's missing? Responsibility #9676
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>PA Ram wrote:</div>
    Actually that dog looks like me after most Rams games.

    Look, breaking under pressure, being mentally weak–I don’t know, maybe. I can’t get inside their heads. But if that’s the problem you’d better draft some new players because I don’t see how you “coach” that out of them. That seems to be a mental make-up kind of thing–you either have mental toughness or you don’t.

    Why suddenly this year?

    This year they can’t handle anything wrong that goes against them?

    How does that happen?

    I think that the coaches HAVE to take responsibility–and particularly Greg Williams. He was the one big coaching change and look at the result. From where this defense was–to where they are–and having MORE talent? I’m taking the Occam’s razor approach and asking–what has changed? Greg Williams. The result is–terrible. Now you can say–new scheme, players aren’t adjusting and all that. But I don’t buy it. If they can’t execute the new scheme for whatever reason–find one they can.

    And after the game, Ray Lewis and some of the other players were dumbfounded at the scheme on that 80 yard touchdown. They called it “high school football”. Lewis was incredulous they would have been set up like that and even in his comments after the game, Fisher said it was a mistake.

    That’s a glaring one.

    How many foul-ups or “high school football” moments aren’t noticed?

    I am thoroughly disgusted with Greg Williams. I believe it was a mistake to bring him in and I’d be happy if he took his wonderful reputation and moved on to the next team.

    You can’t coach them out of it and it takes too long to draft new players.

    Like all teams that gain confidence, you can only do one thing…win a “tide-turning” game.

    I don’t know how many times I have watched “America’s Game,” the show that does an hour long take on great seasons by superbowl winning teams, and heard this: xyz game turned it around, after that we were playing with real confidence.

    It’s the only way. Hiring a new coach won’t change it. Waiting to develop new draftees won’t change it. Fisher doing this or that or one thing or another won’t change it.

    Ok, then I’m in favor
    of winning a
    tide-turning game.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Beyond freaking belief…9ers game reactions thread #9674
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    wv wrote:

    21Dog wrote:

    wv wrote:
    I have not seen the game yet,
    but did 500 year-old Brandon Lloyd
    actually outrun JJ ?
    Is Lloyd faster than JJ?

    w
    v

    Word to the wise (I’m giving you credit for wisdom, wv).

    Don’t watch it.

    Brutal. Inexcusable.

    Watched the replay of it.

    O dear.

    One of the worst regular-season
    plays I’ve seen from a ram CB
    in my 40+ years of watching ram
    football.

    JJ loves the big plays
    dont he.

    w
    v

    Yep.

    Lloyd is slow. We knew that when he was a Ram and is older now. Jenkins is much faster.

    Jenkins made a bigtime, primetime, big circus mistake. He peeked in the backfield with one on one coverage late in a half.

    You don’t do that.

    ESPN tried to make it about the coverage, so there was supposed to be safety help.

    No…Jenkins is SUPPOSED TO KNOW not to do that.

    He knows he’s supposed to know that. That’s why he’s hiding under the table like a cowering dog.

    Maybe they draft a CB high
    next year.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Beyond freaking belief…9ers game reactions thread #9667
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It’s bad. I’m sure they can improve but I just haven’t seen anything that makes me think they will. I agree the team lacks mental toughness. You can almost feel the team giving up at times. I knew the game was over when SF got the TD right before the half. It wasn’t just a momentum swing. It was over.

    I hope things improve but I have no expectations they will.

    Think they can beat
    Seattle in St.Louis?

    I do.

    w
    v

    in reply to: What's missing? Responsibility #9665
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Actually that dog looks like me after most Rams games.

    Look, breaking under pressure, being mentally weak–I don’t know, maybe. I can’t get inside their heads. But if that’s the problem you’d better draft some new players because I don’t see how you “coach” that out of them. That seems to be a mental make-up kind of thing–you either have mental toughness or you don’t.

    Why suddenly this year?

    This year they can’t handle anything wrong that goes against them?

    How does that happen?

    I think that the coaches HAVE to take responsibility–and particularly Greg Williams. He was the one big coaching change and look at the result. From where this defense was–to where they are–and having MORE talent? I’m taking the Occam’s razor approach and asking–what has changed? Greg Williams. The result is–terrible. Now you can say–new scheme, players aren’t adjusting and all that. But I don’t buy it. If they can’t execute the new scheme for whatever reason–find one they can.

    And after the game, Ray Lewis and some of the other players were dumbfounded at the scheme on that 80 yard touchdown. They called it “high school football”. Lewis was incredulous they would have been set up like that and even in his comments after the game, Fisher said it was a mistake.

    That’s a glaring one.

    How many foul-ups or “high school football” moments aren’t noticed?

    I am thoroughly disgusted with Greg Williams. I believe it was a mistake to bring him in and I’d be happy if he took his wonderful reputation and moved on to the next team.

    Well, when Spags hired McD
    it was an utter disaster at first
    but it got better as the season went
    along didnt it?

    Perhaps — I’m not predicting just hoping —
    but perhaps the Ram players will get
    better as they become more familiar
    with GW’s approach. I dunno.

    If not, they get to draft
    a top three player.

    Sigh.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Beyond freaking belief…9ers game reactions thread #9664
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    wv wrote:
    I have not seen the game yet,
    but did 500 year-old Brandon Lloyd
    actually outrun JJ ?
    Is Lloyd faster than JJ?

    w
    v

    Word to the wise (I’m giving you credit for wisdom, wv).

    Don’t watch it.

    Brutal. Inexcusable.

    Watched the replay of it.

    O dear.

    One of the worst regular-season
    plays I’ve seen from a ram CB
    in my 40+ years of watching ram
    football.

    JJ loves the big plays
    dont he.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Beyond freaking belief…9ers game reactions thread #9661
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>wv wrote:</div>
    So, can they salvage this season, 21?
    Do you think they can have a
    good second half of the year?

    Lots of games left
    for this messy-confused-infuriating-team.

    w
    v

    Hate being doom and gloom guy, but I don’t see it getting any better than 3-13.

    The RG3 trade gave this team a chance to rebuild with young players. Early returns aren’t promising. Looking like the Dickerson trade results so far.

    Wow. 3-13.

    I dunno. I have no idea,
    but my guess is they start
    to put it together
    in the second half of the season.

    It certainly looks like GW has
    made a mess of the defense though.

    The offense just seems to involve
    a couple parts on the OLine.

    The story for me right now is
    the Rams Coaching staff: What will they do?
    What can they do? They
    are gonna get withering heat now.
    The fans are lighting the torches.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Beyond freaking belief…9ers game reactions thread #9656
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I have not seen the game yet,
    but did 500 year-old Brandon Lloyd
    actually outrun JJ ?
    Is Lloyd faster than JJ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Beyond freaking belief…9ers game reactions thread #9650
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Even Fredo thinks the Rams are weak.

    Folded up like a cheap suit at the first signs of adversity last night (the Cook call and the pass to Lloyd).

    So, can they salvage this season, 21?
    Do you think they can have a
    good second half of the year?

    Lots of games left
    for this messy-confused-infuriating-team.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: What's missing? Responsibility #9629
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I wonder if there’s anything different
    the coaches can do — or if they
    just need to ‘believe’ and stay
    the course.

    They are going to feel more heat
    now than at any time since
    Fisher got here.

    It will be interesting to see
    what Fisher does.

    This sure doesnt seem like
    what we tend to think of
    when we think of a
    Jeff Fisher team.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Beyond freaking belief…9ers game reactions thread #9627
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well…um….
    things are darkest,
    before dawn.

    Thats all i got.

    w
    v

    in reply to: My cynical take #9565
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Mackeyser wrote:
    Well, that’s part of the “evidence” wv.

    Far too many games where the much better team is severely penalized with what seems like the sole purpose of either keeping the game close or keeping a team from running away from division opponents and clinching a playoff berth too early.

    I mean, the NFL has a HUGE stake in the NFL playoffs being decided in the final week. Having a bunch of teams sit at 12-2 heading into week 15 pretty much seals the deal and only has a few teams fighting for wild card berths…

    I can get behind that. Parity is extremely important for increasing revenue. The more meaningful the games, the more viewers they’ll have. More viewers = more $$$.

    Well, im skeptical. If the league’s Refs were
    trying to keep games interesting, why did Seattle Blow
    out Denver in the Super Bowl? Why didnt
    the Refs keep it close for the ratings?
    Etc.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams beat the 9ers Monday if…. #9564
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Home teams were 9-3-1 this week. That includes teams like Seattle losing, but it was to Dallas.

    And I wasn’t at ALL surprised to hear and read people say that the NFL “needs” teams like Dallas to be good. What a crock of shit.

    So, the NFL doesn’t “need” New York to be good? It’s not a bigger media market than Dallas? Chicago doesn’t “need” to be good?

    I’d be THRILLED…all caps, bolded, underlined, extra large type… with orchestral fanfare… if the Rams could pull out the win.

    I don’t even really care how (other than cheating). Don’t want that.

    Well i heard one tv-celebrity-guy say
    the league needs Dallas to either
    be Real Good, Or, Real Bad.
    There’s drama in either story.

    Thats just how some tv-celebrity-pundits
    think,
    i think.

    Rams can win this game, and any other
    game if they dont turn it over.

    w
    v

    in reply to: My cynical take #9553
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i have no idea. Its pretty much ‘unknowable.’

    I am ‘open to the possibility’
    that individual refs are corrupt
    and take bribes sometimes. In
    fact I’d say thats almost inevitable.

    As to a general conspiracy involving
    multiple refs tipping games in various directions
    for various reasons — Well, again,
    I’m ‘open to the possibility’
    of it, but I doubt it. I’m a skeptic
    until somebody shows me some real proof.

    Having said all that,
    i do think it is highly unlikely
    that one team commits ten penalties
    and another team only commits one, etc.
    Thats just really unlikely, imho.
    So, i cant explain that kind of thing.
    It vexes me. I think i remember a time
    when refs kinda-sorta ‘evened things out’
    if one team was penalized harshly.
    Thats how i remember it in the olden
    days, anyway.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Greg Robinson still awaiting his opportunity — Wagoner #9532
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    jrry32

    The choice isn’t A) get an immediate impact player that turns into a stud or B) get a player that develops into a stud a couple years down the road. It’s more of a percentage breakdown. I actually just ran the numbers out of curiosity, for the players drafted in the first round from 2000 to 2004(did this so the final class would have a decade in the league so there was no question about what a guy developed into) the percentage breakdown is:

    15% are immediate impact players that develop into studs

    15% are not immediate impact players that develop into studs

    15% are immediate impact players that develop into starters (but not studs)

    15% are not immediate impact players that develop into starters(but not studs)

    40% are busts

    So I’m not going to complain if it takes a guy 2-3 years to develop into a stud or even a quality starter because he could have very well been a bust. And that’s ONLY looking at FIRST ROUND PICKS over that 5 year period.

    Schemes, playbooks, responsibilities, and terminology differ greatly from college football to pro football. It’s not something you just know from playing football; it’s something you have to learn. It’s not about learning HOW to block. It’s about knowing what to do on each given play based on what the defense is showing both pre and post-snap.

    I can easily believe that Robinson didn’t/doesn’t understand what’s going on enough to be more productive than Joseph because I’ve seen other young players forced onto the field in similar circumstances and make tons of mental errors due to that…errors that really hurt their team and hindered that player’s development.

    People underestimate the mental side of playing on the line. If Robinson can’t be trusted to decipher and pick-up blitzes/stunts, he’s more of a liability than Joseph.

    Joseph is good for a few irritatingly bad plays each game but doesn’t screw up on every play. If Robinson goes out there and can’t pick the blitz up, he’s going to get Davis pummeled. Because teams will recognize that and blitz the hell out of him. Worst of all, you risk destroying Robinson’s confidence and undoing the technical work you’ve done to this point. The Rams will get him on the field when he’s ready. If we know that Joseph is bad, you better bet the Rams do.

    Why can other rookies start and be successful? Players mature and learn at their own pace…just like people. Some learn quicker than others. Some are more ready because of practical experience than others. Keep in mind that Matthews was a Senior, Robinson was a Sophomore. Matthews started four years in college. Robinson started two years in college. Matthews is the son of a HOF NFL OL and a current NFL OL Coach.

    Hopefully, Robinson can be the difference maker on the OL when he plays.

    Well, but Snisher could have chosen
    a stud who started immediately – Matthews.
    We know Matthews wont be a ‘bust’.

    So did Snisher make the right pick?

    Robinson is gonna have to be
    better than Matthews
    for it to have been the right pick.

    w
    v

    in reply to: fwiw I see a few different qb views out there #9503
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It’s early. And there are too many unknowns. But…here’s what I see:

    1. Davis is better than Bradford already
    2. Bradford is better than Davis & he can come back
    3. Bradford may be better than Davis but he can’t come back, and Davis is fine
    4. Davis isn’t good enough, Bradford can’t come back, so draft a namebrand college kid high in the draft
    5. If Davis improves and Bradford can come back, interesting problem to have

    Its a fascinating issue and i think its
    the Rams-story of the year – Austin Davis.

    Bradford and Davis are so…different.
    Hard to say who’s ‘better’ but they ‘are’
    different.

    Its way too early to know for sure what
    exactly they have in AustinD,
    but IF (and only if) he continues to improve…I would
    probably ‘prefer’ his game to Bradford’s game.

    If Austin is gonna continue to miss blitzers,
    fail at crunch time and be a turnover machine,
    then, he’s just gonna be a good gunslinger-backup.

    But i suspect, he is gonna improve and i suspect
    the Rams have themselves a ram=version of Romo.
    Which is fine with me.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Ungulate #9502
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah, i saw that too.

    Bucky is gone and
    Ungulate.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams beat the 9ers Monday if…. #9453
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Turnovers.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Cosell on 920 … 10/10 #9427
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Good stuff as usual from GC.
    He makes me smile sometimes
    when he’s asked simplistic questions.

    I disagree with GC about AustinD, btw.
    I think his ceiling is higher than
    “midrange quality starter”

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Greg Robinson still awaiting his opportunity — Wagoner #9422
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I still like the Robinson pick.

    But Matthews was certainly
    the safer pick.

    w
    v

    in reply to: The GSOT celebration (articles) #9371
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Has anyone died or gone to prison
    from that 99 team?

    Happy question, i know.

    w
    v

    in reply to: no post -:) #9356
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Note: the author of the original post in this thread has since deleted it on the board where he first posted it.

    Are you saying the new team owner
    wont be PaRam, and the team
    is definitely, for-certain,
    NOT moving to Allentown Pa ?

    Because, if you are,
    then I’m confused.

    w
    v

    in reply to: John Robinson #9339
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    http://articles.latimes.com/1990-12-12/sports/sp-5921_1_cleveland-gary
    LA Times
    When Gary Fumbles, Everyone Lets Loose
    December 12, 1990
    |MIKE PENNER

    Thought for the day:

    “All great backs fumble.”

    –Wendell Tyler, Former Ram Fumbler And some others . . .

    OK. Let’s get the Cleveland Gary jokes out of the way.

    1. Cleveland Gary and Keith Jackson would be great at “Password.”

    2. Cleveland Gary played baseball this summer in the Montreal Expos’ farm system. The scouts said he was good hit, no field.

    3. 7-Eleven is Cleveland Gary’s fumbles-lost-to-total-fumbles ratio–not his future place of employment.

    4. Cleveland Gary can break tackles but can’t hold onto the football. Gaston Green can hold onto the football but can’t break tackles. The Rams have the running back they need; they just don’t have the genetic engineering.

    There. Good to get that out of our system. If Gary can get the fumbles out of his, everybody’s happy.

    At 5-8, the Rams seem a lock for the franchise’s first losing season since 1972, discounting strike years. In 1972, the Rams finished 6-7-1 during Tommy Prothro’s last season as head coach. Since then, the Rams’ only other sub-.500 finishes have been the strike years of 1982 (2-7) and 1987 (6-9).

    Ram MVP, if there is such a beast, ought to be Buford McGee. With fumbles, interceptions and defenses exploding all around him, McGee has been a lonely bastion of reliability. He leads the team with a 5.7-yards-per-carry average, is tied for second with Flipper Anderson with 41 receptions and ranks third in scoring with five touchdowns. He also pass-blocks by the textbook, covers on special teams and even throws the occasional touchdown pass–doing all the little things so many others have ignored in Anaheim.

    One more difference between the ’89 Rams and the ’90 Rams: Last season, playoffs included, the Rams were 6-3 in games decided by a touchdown or less. This season, that record is 1-4.

    And another: Last season, Jim Everett takes that extra play against New Orleans and finds Pete Holohan in the end zone for the winning touchdown.

    And another: Last season, Everett takes the Rams right down and scores right after the Rams win the coin flip to begin overtime with Cincinnati.

    Right now, those two games are the difference between the playoffs and playing out the string in 1990.
    =======================

    http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/cleveland-gary/recent/4
    Gary: Fumbles Relapse Will Last Only One Game
    November 10, 1992|TIM KAWAKAMI | TIMES STAFF WRITER

    This time, Cleveland Gary promised himself and anybody else who would listen Monday, he will not allow his breakthrough season to be ruined by a spree of dropped footballs.

    On Sunday, in a reminder of his 12-fumble season two years ago, the Rams’ tailback lost two fumbles to the Phoenix Cardinals, setting up their two winning touchdown drives.

    After the game, Gary bolted out of the locker room before anybody could stop him for a public explanation.

    But Monday, with his coach and his teammates voicing their support, Gary faced the media, apologized for his postgame duck and said he was too strong to let these most recent fumbles destroy what had been shaping into a Pro Bowl season.

    “I want to be a perfectionist when it comes to not fumbling,” Gary said Monday. “Yesterday was a relapse, and I think in order to succeed at anything, I can’t do from a mental standpoint what I did before. . . . I start(ed) thinking about it, and that won’t happen.

    “I had one (bad) day. I’m proud of myself, and I’ve learned how to reward myself. I’ve carried the ball a hundred-something times without dropping the football, so what I have to do is put that one day behind me.”

    Coach Chuck Knox downplayed Gary’s fumbles on Monday and said he is the team’s tailback, period. Knox said he thought the fumbles were a result of Gary’s trying to make second- and third-effort yards, the kind of running the coach has always admired.

    “All I’m going on is what I’ve seen since we’ve been here, and he’s sitting up there (as) about the third-leading rusher in the NFC,” Knox said. “He’s done a good job for us.”

    Before Sunday, Gary had fumbled twice–losing one–in 150 carries, and he had come a long way in erasing the memory of his two lost seasons. Last year, Gary fumbled on his second carry of the season, also against the Cardinals, and never got back into former coach John Robinson’s main running rotation.

    This year Gary has gained 718 yards in 167 carries and scored eight touchdowns.

    Gary’s fumbles Sunday were varied. The first occurred early in the third quarter, when Gary said he was trying to make a big play happen after being held to seven yards on seven attempts during the first half.

    He crashed into the line, was slowed, then spun through the pile for extra yardage. But he swung his arm away from his body and exposed the ball for linebacker Eric Hill, who knocked it loose.

    “I could’ve very well taken a four- or five-yard gain,” Gary said. “But instead, I spun off, and I put my body in a position maybe I shouldn’t have put it in. I spun off and tried to make something happen.”

    His second fumble, which tumbled out of bounds, was similar.

    The third, and most costly, occurred when Ken Harvey burst past a block and met Gary moments after he had taken the handoff. “What I have to do (is) go back to the basic fundamentals, get the ball over the pressure points and keep it in,” Gary said. “And what I can’t do, I can’t do.”
    ===========================

    Gary Recovers After Fumbles : Rams: Running back says he has put game behind him and apologizes for behavior.
    November 10, 1992|TIM KAWAKAMI | TIMES STAFF WRITER

    ANAHEIM — This time, Cleveland Gary promised himself and anybody who listened Monday that he will not allow his breakthrough season to be ruined by a spree of dropped footballs.

    Sunday, in a dark reminder of his 12-fumble season two years ago, the Rams’ tailback lost two crucial fumbles to the Cardinals, one of which set up Phoenix’s winning touchdown drive.

    After the game, Gary bolted out of the locker room before anybody could stop him for an explanation.

    But Monday, with his coach and teammates still voicing their support for him, Gary faced the media, apologized for his postgame duck-and-run, and said he was too strong to let these most-recent fumbles destroy what had been shaping up to be a Pro Bowl-caliber season.

    “I want to be a perfectionist when it comes to not fumbling,” Gary said Monday. “Yesterday was a relapse, and I think in order to succeed at anything, I can’t do from a mental standpoint what I did before . . . I start thinking about it, and that won’t happen.

    “I had one (bad) day. I’m proud of myself, and I’ve learned how to reward myself. I’ve carried the ball a hundred-something times without dropping the football, so what I have to do is put that one day behind me.”

    Coach Chuck Knox downplayed Gary’s fumbles Monday and said Gary is the team’s tailback, period. Knox said he thought the fumbles came as a result of Gary exposing himself trying to make second- and third-effort yards, the kind of hard running Knox has always admired.

    “All I’m going on is what I’ve seen since we’ve been here, and he’s sitting up there about the third-leading rusher in the NFC,” Knox said. “He’s done a good job for us.

    “I don’t want him to go up in there and just lay down on the ball. You’ve got to go up, take it up in there . . . and he has been hanging onto it. (But) these things happen.

    “I still think you’ve got to run up in there as hard as you can run, and fight, get everything you can get–but take the ball with you.”

    Before Sunday, Gary had fumbled twice–losing one–in 150 carries. Last year, Gary fumbled on his second carry of the season–also against the Cardinals–and never got back into Coach John Robinson’s main running rotation.

    This season, though, with the solid backing of Knox, Gary has gained 718 yards in 167 carries and scored eight touchdowns.

    “Yesterday was just an awful experience, but it was an experience that I learned from,” Gary said. “This year, I’ve had so much success pretty much when I’ve wanted . . .

    “But yesterday was different.”

    On Sunday, Gary’s fumbles were a variety pack of bobbles. The first one came early in the third quarter, when Gary said he was trying to make a big play happen after being held to seven yards in seven attempts in the first half.

    Gary crashed into the line, was slowed, then spun through the pile for extra yardage. But he swung his arm away from his body and exposed the ball to linebacker Eric Hill, who knocked it loose.

    “I could’ve very well taken a four or five-yard gain,” Gary said. “But instead, I spun off, and I put my body in a position maybe I shouldn’t have put it in. I spun off and tried to make something happen.

    “I was pressing it too hard. I was more focused on making things happen than the basic fundamentals. It just left me.”

    That was the sort of fumble that plagued Gary in 1990–exposing the ball when he was trying to make late moves. His second fumble, which tumbled out of bounds, was similar.

    The third, and most costly, came when Ken Harvey burst past a block and met Gary moments after Gary took the handoff.

    “What I have to do (is) go back to the basic fundamentals, get the ball over the pressure points and keep it in,” Gary said. “And what I can’t do, I can’t do.

    “I have to keep it there rather than letting it slip sometimes. It got a little comfortable.”

    Despite his quick yank last season, Gary said he never feared that Knox was going to pull him for good Sunday, or that his teammates were losing confidence in him.

    “That thought never entered my mind,” Gary said. “Coach Knox has judged Cleveland based on what he’s done since he’s been here. Coach Knox isn’t reliving somebody else’s past.

    “He looks at a man for his character, the way he is when he sees him.

    “I’m grateful that Coach Knox and my teammates haven’t judged me on the past, and I think that’s why I’ve been successful. That has helped my confidence factor tremendously. It gives me motivation to put this garbage behind me.”

    And Gary, who said he left the locker room quickly because he was still stunned by his fumbles, made a point of trying to put his Sunday media no-show behind him.

    “The first thing I would like to do is apologize for my departing,” Gary said. “It was a mistake. I am human, and I do make mistakes. And one of the mistakes I made (Sunday) was leaving and not facing the media.

    “I had a lot on my mind at the time, and I handled it the best way I felt I knew how. And obviously it wasn’t the way I should’ve handled it. I should’ve stayed there.
    ===========================

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Rams News Recap: Oct. 7 #9324
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/10/07/jeff-fisher-st-louis-rams
    Jeff Fisher: A Rock of Stability
    See link

    ..“You point out exactly what happened, then you move on,” says Fisher. “Players don’t make mistakes on purpose. After a tough Sunday, you still want them to look forward to coming to work on Monday.”

    Being oh-and-two in this league is rough; oh-and-three’s a bitch,” says the ebullient Dave McGinnis, one-time coach of the Cardinals and now Fisher’s chief assistant. “I’ve been with Jeff when we started oh-and-six” — with the Titans, in ’09; that team finished 8-8 and missed the playoffs by one game — “and when we started 10-0. And from one scenario to the other, I swear his demeanor hardly changed an inch.

    “He’s got this California cool about him, a confidence that makes everyone around him think, ‘OK, we can do this.’”

    …Fisher was preceded by Jim Haslett and Steve Spagnuolo, two first-time head coaches who never really stood a chance. “We failed them more than they failed us,” says Demoff, referring to the cavalcade of misbegotten trades and bad draft choices perpetrated before and during that 65-loss Slough in St. Loo. If the Rams’ first-round picks from 2000 through ’09 lived in the same zip code — Trung Canidate (’01), Robert Thomas (’02), Jimmy Kennedy (’03), Alex Barron (’05), Tye Hill (’06), Adam Carriker (’07), Jason Smith (’09) — that town would be called Bustopolis. (Steven Jackson, ’04, and Chris Long, ’08, are the productive exceptions.) The constant turnover, Demoff admits, was driven by “the pressure it’s so easy to fall prey to in the NFL, to get better Now! Now! Now!”

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: The Jeff Fisher Show–Audio #9320
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well…another player talking about AustinD’s ‘fire’
    and emotion.

    Fisher’s first comment: Bennie is good
    without the ball.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Austin Davis #9289
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    =================================================
    Laram

    I know most here are quite impressed with Austin Davis, and I love his moxy and aggressiveness but he’s going to get exposed over the next several games.

    His play was a mixed bag in the Philly game. Early on he was late on some throws, high on others and didn’t show good field awareness.

    The slide short of the 1st down where he clearly could have gotten the first down easily, showed bad awareness, and I’m going to mention something again that i mentioned in the chat room.

    A number of those sacks were on him.

    I will try and put some slides together but go back and look at this play.

    2nd qtr Eagles up 13-0, Rams have a 2nd and goal at the Eagles 5 yd line.

    The Rams motion to an empty set, the Eagles had an automatic check, its a O blitz (Mama that means the defense is sending 6) Austin has got to recognize that and get rid of the ball quickly, because they’re sending more than you have blockers for.

    It is not the o-lines fault, when the defense sends more than you have blockers for, that is on the qb.

    When the defense has an automatic check, against an empty backfield, they’re coming. That’s qb 101, even I know that.

    Austin never sees the free rusher, boom, sack fumble…Eagles ball and a 14 pt turnaround.

    All AD has to do is look down the line to his right, and he will see where the free rusher is coming from.

    This was an easy one and recognition that an NFL qb should see.

    That was another one of his TO’s that was very costly.

    Good defenses will definitely see what I do.
    —————
    I’m already rolling with AD, I roll with ANY Rams qb.

    What I’m attempting to do is illustrate that the hysteria should be tempered with a bit of reserve.
    =================================

    ===================

    I agree with La that AustinD made some critical mistakes.
    He’s a work in progress.

    But its only his third game, right? So even though
    other teams will scout him and gameplan him — HE
    is also going to get better one would think.

    Three games. Thats all he’s played.
    He’s showed me a LOT so far.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
Viewing 30 posts - 11,821 through 11,850 (of 12,315 total)