Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 10,381 through 10,410 (of 11,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Chris Long is no longer a ‘ghost’

    By Jim Thomas
    But as the weeks rolled by, one indication that Long was growing stir crazy came on Twitter. Namely his always interesting tweets on @JOEL9ONE got even more “out there” than usual.

    For example, he has power rankings of flightless birds, months of the year, and sharks.

    I would go with:

    3 Emu
    2 Ostrich
    1 Emperor Penguin

    w
    v

    in reply to: In Loving Memory of Don Paul #11776
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Don Paul

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Paul_%28linebacker%29
    =========================

    http://www.profootballhof.com/history/2009/9/4/coach-wants-to-see-you/
    …“The Turk” is the NFL’s version of the Grim Reaper. He is the individual assigned by the team who is responsible for tracking down players and explaining to them that they are being released. “Coach wants to see you, and make sure you bring your playbooks” are the famous last words that no player wants to hear come from “The Turk.”

    In years past he was known as “Squeaky Shoes.” Players said they could hear his shoes squeaking down the halls of the dormitories during training camp as he made his way from room to room cutting players that didn’t make the final roster. It wasn’t until the 1950s in Los Angeles that the name “Turk” became synonymous with the man given the distasteful duty of releasing players.

    Don Paul, a former linebacker with the L.A. Rams from 1948-1955, reportedly came up with the name. His coach, Clark Shaughnessy, had a specific method of releasing players. He would send someone in the organization to wake the player in the middle of the night.

    That way the individual would be less apt to get angry since he would still be trying to wake up. The player would be told to grab all of his stuff because the coach wanted to see him.

    The player would then have an exit interview with the coach, turn in his playbook and be gone by breakfast. Shaughnessy’s method made everyone uncomfortable, which one can only assume was part of the reason he used this method. From rookies to seasoned veterans, nobody felt safe. Rams players often went to sleep and when they woke up their roommate was gone. No time to say goodbye, simply out of sight and out of mind. Don began proclaiming “The Turk strikes at night.” The story began floating around the league. Soon everyone was on alert to beware of “The Turk” who lurks in the halls of the teams’ facilities waiting to utter those dreaded words, “Coach wants to see you…and bring your playbook.”
    – See more at: http://www.profootballhof.com/history/2009/9/4/coach-wants-to-see-you/#sthash.PkS2UFp3.dpuf
    ===================
    w
    v

    in reply to: reporters on Hill starting #11766
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Among qualifying quarterbacks, only Colin Kaepernick had a higher sack rate than Davis’ 9.3 percent this season.

    It’s higher than 9.3%. PRF lists it as 9.3%, which is doubtless where he gets the number from, but it’s actually 29 sacks on 284 attempts, which is 10.2%.

    Off the top of my head, it looks like 10.2% is the worst sack percentage of any starting Rams qb since they kept the numbers on this. Bradford was at 9.2% in 2011, but that was 2011 and all that implies. Even in the OL Injury Apocalypse of 2007, Bulger was at 8.3%. Kyle Boller in the Third OL Injury Apocalypse of 2009 was at 8.8%.

    10.2% is worse than Clemens behind more or less the same OL, and Clemens had issues handling pressure too.

    The sacks aren’t even the thing that bothered me about AustinD.
    It was the turnovers and the inability to be poised in the pocket.

    w
    v

    in reply to: reporters on Hill starting #11763
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    If u want to read some dum
    comments, you can find them
    at the link below.

    w
    v

    ========================
    http://www.footballoutsiders.com/extra-points/2014/rams-bench-davis-shaun-hill
    Football Outsiders
    12 Nov 2014
    Rams Bench Davis For Shaun Hill

    Austin Davis’ stint as a starting quarterback in the NFL is over after eight games. The St. Louis Rams have benched the second-year player in favor of veteran Shaun Hill, who started in Week 1 but was knocked out of the game with a thigh injury.

    Davis’ greatest weakness was a propensity to give up sacks. Among qualifying quarterbacks, only Colin Kaepernick had a higher sack rate than Davis’ 9.3 percent this season. Hill struggled with the same issue in the start of his career in San Francisco (8.3 percent sack rate in three seasons), but improved drastically in his four years in Detroit (3.8 percent sack rate).

    Posted by: Vincent Verhei on 12 Nov 2014
    ====================

    in reply to: Does anyone here believe we can beat Denver on Sunday? #11734
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Even if the Nazis got the A-Bomb first we still would have won.
    Payton Manning on the Rams is like the Nazis with the A-Bomb….

    Well if the Rams are the Nazis
    and Fisher is McClellan
    then, I’d like to see
    the cover of the Media Guide.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Does anyone here believe we can beat Denver on Sunday? #11728
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Not sure how the Rams playing at home is necessarily a big advantage. They tend to drop some of their biggest turds at home. Those fans, God bless ‘em, they have witnessed some horrific football. Yeah, yeah, I know, Seattle. A blind squirrel is likely to stumble across an acorn eventually. Let’s hope they stumble across another one Sunday. I’m not holding my breath, though.

    Switch Peyton to the Rams
    and Hill to Denver — Think
    the rams would win? Yes? No?

    Is it all about the difference
    in QB ?

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Does anyone here believe we can beat Denver on Sunday? #11726
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    When the schedule came out, I pointed to this game this week as the surprise win in ’14. I’m sticking with it. Denver is on the third game of a 3 game road trip. The Rams’ defense is growing stronger each game. Rams coming off a three game road trip will play better at home, and defeat the Broncos Sunday. After, everyone will be questioning what happened to the Broncos, just like they did when the Rams beat Seattle and SF.

    Good to see you on
    the board I-man.

    Denver’s not in the NFC West
    so the rams cant beat them.
    Its algebra.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Hill to start Sunday #11711
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    That wasn’t an “INT”–that is, he didn’t decide to throw to the wrong place with the result being a pick.

    That’s when they found out the quad was bad. He tried to heave it out of bounds but didn’t have his legs so the ball had less power on it.

    I dont remember reading that anywhere.
    Therefore, you must by a vile lying liar.
    Pistols at dawn.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Hill to start Sunday #11708
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ============================
    Laram

    When your qb says himself “I’ve gotta quit looking at the rush, and keep my eyes downfield” That’s a problem!!

    Hill is a veteran who has seen every blitz you can run IMO.

    He knows how to identify blitzes pre-snap and where the free blitzer is. He can read defenses, and process information quicker.

    In the NFL experience is invaluable, which is what I think the Rams need right now.

    We’ve all seen Austin Davis now and know he’s not the future.

    No reason to keep riding him now.

    Bring on Hill.
    —-
    I’ve shown too many stills and posted game plans of what defenses would do to Davis.

    When Davis played against any type of respectable defense, he folded.

    He has thrown 4 Pick 6’s in the 4th qtr, and 2 fumbles returned for TD’s. That’s -42.

    You can get a back-up off the scrap heap to do that.

    I want to win games, I could care less at this point about trying to see if I have a freaking back-up on the roster.

    I’ll worry about that in the off season, right now as a coach, you better be worried about W’s!!
    =========================

    in reply to: Hill to start Sunday #11706
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    rfl wrote:
    PS. WV, remember when we could be proud of the team? Sure, they lost Conference title games. And they couldn’t match up with the Whiners in their glory. But they always played tough football.

    No one thought SOSAR. We were the Rams. We knew how to defend and run the ball. Even when we lost, we did it with pride.

    Damn. What would it feel like to think that people actually RESPECTED us? Can’t remember.

    I feel the same way.

    Well, it would not surprise me
    in the least if this team was 11-5
    in season FOUR.

    I’m sorry, but I’m a ram fan
    and it had to be said 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: Hill to start Sunday #11698
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>wv wrote:</div>
    Year FOUR. Its all about year FOUR :)
    Or five. I forget.
    Or six.

    w
    v

    Yep. It’s like the sardonic slogans developed by war-weary GIs in WW II:

    “Home alive in ’45”
    (Can’t remember the ’46 slogan)
    “Heaven in ’47”
    “Golden Gate in ’48.”

    I think a significant mistake
    had to be the decision to go with
    Jake Long, the former all pro,
    but injured LT. It was a gamble
    that cost them. Jake just
    wasnt an allpro anymore
    and was too inconsistent.

    And i was all for the
    signing at the time.

    Ah well.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Hill to start Sunday #11696
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    PS. WV, remember when we could be proud of the team? Sure, they lost Conference title games. And they couldn’t match up with the Whiners in their glory. But they always played tough football.

    No one thought SOSAR. We were the Rams. We knew how to defend and run the ball. Even when we lost, we did it with pride.

    Damn. What would it feel like to think that people actually RESPECTED us? Can’t remember.

    Well, yeah, it sucks, alright.

    But Ram posters are still cool. 🙂

    Its 30 degrees here. Winter
    has arrived.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Hill to start Sunday #11693
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>wv wrote:</div>
    The Rams continue to…uh…be
    the Rams.

    w
    v

    Ain’t it the heart-breaking truth.

    Year FOUR. Its all about year FOUR 🙂
    Or five. I forget.
    Or six.

    How cold is it in Minny?

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Hill to start Sunday #11690
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Breaking my retirement to announce this….Jim Thomas broke the story

    What ‘retirement’ ? You CANT retire.

    Alrighty then.

    Now that, THATS been straightened out,
    it’s inter esting news about the
    Return of Mr Hill.

    The Rams continue to…uh…be
    the Rams.
    The last time we saw Mr Hill
    he was throwin a Really bad INT
    as i recall. Before that
    he looked pretty good.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: player vids, 11/12 – McDonald #11674
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i think it was an idiotic question
    from the reporter: “how important is it that you finish games?”
    or somethin like that.
    And then TJ says, well yeah we gotta finish games.

    Might as well ask him: How important is it
    to get more points than the other team?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams News Recap: Nov. 11 #11669
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Jim Thomas audio — The stadium issue for the first eleven mins, and then football stuff

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/cbs-sports-920am-aeneas-williams-11-10-14-and-jim-thomas-11-11-14-podcasts/

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photozn.
    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: How many more Wins? #11668
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    HighPlainsDrifter wrote:
    Do the Rams have a running game? Do they have a top defense?

    Yes I think the Rams will have those things.

    Some people are seeing the fog of losing.

    But I think I see the approaching village through that fog.

    Mind you, 1. I could be wrong of course, and 2. so far I don’t see a quarterback in that approaching village. Not yet anyway.

    Nice looking bakery, though.

    f

    Is it an elite bakery
    or only a complimentary Bakery?

    w
    v

    in reply to: anyone here ever hurt their knee? #11666
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Denver thinking about signing the Cog #11662
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    espn Bronco blog

    ==============================
    http://espn.go.com/blog/denver-broncos
    “…..While the Raiders do feature Khalil Mack, who has forced his share of holding penalties and has pressured opposing quarterbacks with some regularity, the Raiders are currently last in the league in sacks with eight. And the Rams’ defensive front, at least the defensive front the Rams have showed the past four games — 16 sacks combined, including eight against the San Francisco 49ers — figures to be a notch above.

    With Louis Vasquez at right tackle (his first career start at the position), Manny Ramirez at right guard (where Vasquez was an All-Pro last season) and Will Montgomery getting his first start at center, quarterback Peyton Manning wasn’t sacked and the Broncos rushed for 118 yards.

    But the Raiders were able to affect Manning and disrupt the Broncos for most of the first half Sunday when the Broncos were in three-WR sets. They got enough push to deflect four of Manning’s passes at the line of scrimmage, forced Manning into an intentional grounding penalty and forced two interceptions, one coming when defensive end Justin Tuck deflected the ball and dove to make the interception — all in the first half.

    Including their time with the Titans, Rams head coach Jeff Fisher, assistant head coach Dave McGinnis and defensive coordinator Gregg Williams may have faced Manning more than any coaches in the league. They figure to pound away at the Broncos’ new look, especially to the right side of the offense into Manning’s face as he sets to throw, to see if the group is up to a more significant challenge.
    =============

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: How many more Wins? #11660
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Do the Rams have a running game? Do they have a top defense? I’m not convinced that the Rams have the “established” components that will take the load off of a young quarterback. I certainly haven’t seen much this season that would indicate that this is the case. The Rams are one of the youngest teams in the league. They could have a couple more young offensive linemen in front of the quarterback, whoever he might be. I don’t believe that the Rams are in the position of those other teams that you mentioned who started young QBs and thrived. A lot can change between now and then, but as of now, color me dubious. I think a young QB plays like a young QB, and the progress of the team is likely to stagnate for a time while the youngster gets acclimated.

    I dunno what i think of the offense,
    but the defense will be interesting to watch
    if Barron is a solid player and if C.Long
    can come back strong.

    As of now, and if it were me, the draft
    would be all about QB and OLine and LB.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Is it time for Hill? #11636
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think i would try Hill
    at this point. Why not?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Does anyone here believe we can beat Denver on Sunday? #11635
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    With Hill as the starter?Maybe.Davis?Absolutely not.

    I tend to agree with that.
    Austin is a mess right now.
    Dunno what Hill is.

    Course these coaches arent idiots.
    If they think Austin gives them
    a better chance to win than Hill,
    then…..sigh.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Losing my capacity for caring #11631
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Look. Everybody around here was worried that I might attempt suicide if the Rams hired Fisher as coach. I made my views known that I consider him to be one of Satan’s minions.

    But.

    It is precisely BECAUSE I believed that Fisher was in league with Satan that I accepted him as coach.

    If it turns out that he isn’t, that he’s just an ordinary evil guy like Colonel Klink,
    then I am going to need professional help.

    Year FOUR. Its all about year FOUR.
    Just keep repeating that. 🙂

    Oh and btw, we’ve been posting together
    since, what, 98 now? — its been an honor.
    Truly. An honor.

    Maybe we’ll see another championship
    before we die.
    Carry on, Z.

    I gotta go. I’m baking
    rice and books.

    w
    v
    “I love Zack and he knows that. But this is exactly where we differ!
    Zack is in the fetal position, but my head is in the oven! No amount of semantics can change this.”
    Zooey’d For Life

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Does anyone here believe we can beat Denver on Sunday? #11628
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    They’d probly have to knock Peyton out
    to do it.

    I’m lookin forward to seein how
    the defense plays against the Denver O.
    They might surprise us.

    The Offense is hopeless, now.
    Ah well.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Losing my capacity for caring #11620
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well i hope RFL is wrong about Fisher
    being McClellan. I dunno.

    If the defense really keeps improving
    and gels, i will continue to be pretty optimistic.

    Hard to judge an offense when the franchise QB
    is sitting on the bench. Lets see how the Cards
    look with Carson gone now.

    At any rate, i just enjoy the whole ram-fan thing.
    I just kinda smile and shake my head during years like this.
    It’ll take more than just one decade of futility
    to wear me down 🙂

    w
    v

    http://www.nellaware.com/blog/george-b-mcclellan-quotes.html

    “Will you pardon me for asking what the horses of your army have done since the battle of Antietam that fatigues anything?”
    –President Abraham Lincoln’s question directed to George B. McClellan, who had excused his lack of action in the fall of 1862 because of exhausted horses. McClellan was removed from command soon afterward.

    “If he had a million men he would swear the enemy has two millions, and then he would sit down in the mud and yell for three.”
    –Edwin M. Stanton, the United States secretary of war commenting on General George B. McClellan. McClellan often overestimated the number of enemy forces opposing him, and so he always needed and wanted more men and more supplies before he could take offensive action.

    It is called the Army of the Potomac, but it is only McClellan’s bodyguard…If McClellan is not using the army, I should like to borrow it for a while.
    –Abraham Lincoln on April 9, 1862, regarding George B. McClellan. McClellan often tested Lincoln’s patience because of his failure to take action against the Confederates. This quote is from a note Lincoln eventually decided not to send.

    General McClellan, if I understand you correctly, before you strike at the Rebels, you want to be sure of plenty of room so you can run in case they strike back.
    –This is from Zachariah Chandler, a member of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War as he was questioning McClellan regarding his inability to take offensive movement against the Rebels.

    =======

    Ultimately, McClellan failed, and history has not been kind to failures. Historian Richard N. Current wrote that “McClellan had his faults. Though fond of Napoleonic poses, he lacked the fighting blood of Bonaparte. He was slow, overcautious, duped by his spies’ fantastic exaggerations of enemy strength. Yet he had real abilities, particularly in drilling troops and inspiring them with loyalty and trust. To some extent his faults were merely defects of his virtues. He sought to make the most of the Union preponderance in men and resources – to win the war by strategy, not butchery.” 13 McClellan biographer Stephen W. Sears called McClellan “inarguably the worst” Union general to head the Army of the Potomac. 14 James Russell Lowell wrote in 1864 that McClellan possessed “every theoretic qualification, but no ardor, no leap, no inspiration. A defensive general in an earthen redoubt not an ensign to rally enthusiasm and inspire devotion.”15 Historian Kenneth P. Williams called McClellan “a vain and unstable man, with considerable military knowledge, who sat a horse well and wanted to be President.”16 Lincoln aides John G. Nicolay and John Hay determined to destroy McClellan’s reputation in their ten-volume biography of the President. “I have toiled and labored through ten chapters over McClellan,” wrote Hay to Nicolay. “I think I have left the impression of his mutinous imbecility, and I have done it in a perfectly courteous manner…It is of the utmost moment that we should seem fair to him, while…destroying him.”17 …
    http://abrahamlincolnsclassroom.org/abraham-lincolns-contemporaries/abraham-lincoln-and-george-b-mcclellan/

    in reply to: reporters do the ARZ game post-mortem #11588
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “…fluke injury to the Rams’ top deep threat resulted in more damage than anticipated.

    “He did just about everything you possibly can to the shoulder,’’ Fisher said. “You talk about rotator cuff, labrum, bicep tendon, just everything. It was a successful surgery, a successful procedure, but he’s going to be immobilized for quite some time.’’
    Author
    ======================

    Damn.

    w
    v

    in reply to: reporters do the ARZ game post-mortem #11561
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I am not a fan of statements like “I need to learn the game is four quarters long.”

    That is a meaningless statement, to me, whether coaches say it or players.

    w
    v

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/13498/austin-davis-not-the-answer-for-rams-at-qb
    Wagoner

    “I didn’t play well enough to win today,” Davis said. “I think the thing I’m learning really quick is you can play well for three and a half quarters but you’ve got to play four. You can’t have a single letdown and right now I’m having those and it’s costing our football team. I’ve got to stay the course, stay strong and keep getting better and eliminate these mistakes, mainly turnovers, that are costing our football team.”

    (On the Peterson INTI just underthrew the ball,” Davis said. “I don’t really have an answer for it. I don’t understand it. We got the look we were looking for, I thought Chris ran a good route and won, the ball didn’t go where I wanted it to.”

    (On Peterson INT number two)”The second one, I just threw it high and it gets tipped around,” Davis said. “Two critical plays, you can’t turn the football over. We knew coming in that was kind of their thing. They kind of live off the turnover and you saw it there at the end.”

    In nine games, Davis’ fourth-quarter passer rating is 68.1 with a QBR of 23.8, which includes a 12.0 and 0.1 on Sunday.
    “It can’t happen,” Davis said. “It’s killing our defense. They’re playing their tails off. For me to have those letdowns, it’s really tough. I’ve got to get a lot better and I can’t do that.”

    in reply to: Austin Davis thread, post-Arz game #11555
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    zn wrote:

    Eternal Ramnation wrote:
    When your OL allows 6 sacks we might as well put Hecker back there. Davis is the perfect fit for this horrible OL as he is durable.He won’t win many but when you allow 6 sacks you don’t win anyways.

    Was that all the OL, though? It’s an important question. I put as much of that on Davis. I don’t think he handles the pressure. There are qbs that handle the blitz, and I don’t think that Davis has that yet.

    Yeah, I think most of the sacks could be attributed to him holding the ball too long. He was indecisive.

    How did Greg Robinson look?

    Better than sammy watkins? 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: Austin Davis thread, post-Arz game #11549
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well are there free agent options at QB next year?
    Or is the draft the only avenue.

    Such a strange year/team. Earlier in the year
    a lot of us were thinking the QB situation was lookin
    pretty good but the defense was a mess.
    Now, of course things are reversed, kinda.

    Year Three, has not turned out well
    has it.

    I wonder what their record would be if Bradford
    was healthy? Would they have won more games?
    The same? Fewer?

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: combined "today's game" & "arizona game lamentations" threads #11542
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Typical 2014 Rams — the losses are full
    of signs of a good team in the making,
    and the wins are full of indications
    of a team with issues.

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 10,381 through 10,410 (of 11,046 total)