InvaderRam wrote:

i’m happy for him. worried that the rams would just drag it out and let him go. a joy to watch.

Honestly, I am not sure you can win a super bowl with KW. I dunno. Most fumbles in the NFL over the last two years.
IF I am an NFL Defensive Co., I’d be HAPPY to go up against KW, as opposed to a Saquon or Mixon or half a dozen others.

And yes, he has great vision and crafty-ness and all that Lawrence-McCutcheon-ness.

w
v

J. Rodrigue is the guest

zn wrote:

wv wrote:

Yeah, he’s a monster, blah blah, but i totally resonate with folks that talk about how ‘refreshing’ it is to have a monster who just says the fucking THING that the rest of them wont say OUT LOUD.

The dems have exactly nobody like that.

w
v

Enh, disagree a bit. There’s no putting perfume on this. Trump gets elected by lying to a gullible party base about the economic agenda. What he says aloud is the “culture wars” stuff that sucks in the gullible base.

I dont disagree with any of that, but i’m making a point about ‘how’ he appeals to people. He’s brilliant at doing a certain thing. And the Dems have no-one who can do ‘this thing’ I’m talking about. Bernie is the closest and he’s not really close. Its not about policy. Not talking about ‘substance’.

w
v

Zooey wrote:

zn wrote:

I agree that that doesn’t honestly represent what we usually mean by “continued investment.”

I think many of us expected them to draft one or two guys.

If the Rams fall flat this year, I would think that will be the reason. OLine. As per usual.

w
v

trump wants to stage a UFC fight at the white house

The andromeda paradox. Never heard of it. Dont understand it.

So he is ‘likely’ the teams number 3 QB. I am not impressed.

w
v

Fox News, on the Dem Socialist who won the NY primary:

zn wrote:

So it’s like, workers of the world unite, the great issue before us is billionaires making local governments pay for stadiums. Oh, and, Stafford isn’t so great when protection breaks down.

…

“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of offensive line struggles.”

“A specter is haunting the Western division…”

“In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your tush push. Precisely so: that is just what we intend.”

w
v

“a knower of ball”

I like that.

wv ram, knower-of-ball

zn wrote:

zn wrote:

Hall of Fame quarterback Steve Young completed an interview with Rich Eisen last week

This is a good one. It has a bit about Stafford, but the interesting part is where Young talks about how older qbs benefit from rules changes.

Yeah, Steve Young is always talking about the idea that QBs who can run are the new prototype, etc. And i agree with him in general, but then the running-QB-advocates ALWAYS neglect to mention the Stafford super bowl win. I always listen close to these guys and they NEVER mention the Stafford win. Its always Hertz, Mahommes, Josh Allan, Lamar, etc, blah blah.

Fact is a Brady or a Stafford can still win a Ring in this new NFL.

Maybe even a Flacco.

I wonder what Dan Marino would look like in todays NFL.

w
v

I see the Lakers just sold for 10 billion dollars. I wonder what the Rams are now worth ?

w
v