Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipantWhat do you think of this tactic by the Trump machine — linking Hillary to Beyonce and ‘vulgar’ lyrics — it did make me pause…
wvParticipantStein realizes Trump is a statesman. While some here claim Trump will end the world and the human race, their chosen candidate Jill Stein disagrees with them. Crickets.
———
She didnt say Trump is a ‘statesman’ and i doubt she thinks that. She was talking about one particular issue — Russia/Syria. And she may be right about that, I’m not sure.
In general though, I’m not sure which of the two bozos is more likely to cause a nuclear exchange. Hard to say.…I will add this, fwiw — ive been listening to NPR lately and they have totally lost all pretense of being ‘neutral’ about the Hillary v Trump thing. They are pretty obviously supporting Hillary now. They haven’t reached Fox-News-Level bias but they are getting close. Seems that way to me, anyway.
w
v
wvParticipantCheck out the Ben Carson comment and the look on the reporters face. Bout the 6:15 mark or so:
wvParticipantHow important is Pencil-vania ?
Pretty important, apparently:
link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-9Vb-Xiw3gOctober 13, 2016 at 9:57 pm in reply to: injury reports starting 10/12 to … 10/? … Lions are beat up too #55176
wvParticipantThe loss of Ngata is significant.
The Lions injuries are kinda spread around though. Its not the same as losing three fourths of a DLine.
w
v
wvParticipantThe choices that Rick’s crew began to make were similar to what dumb victims do in slasher movies….
————-
Yup. Exactly.
One of my little nitpix btw, is this — and this exists in all six seasons — when they kill zombies, zombie blood flies all over the place. The humans are constantly being drenched in zombie blood — so how come that doesnt infect them and give them zombie-fever? I mean if they get bit, or scratched they get the fever, right– but not if they are literally drenched in zombie blood-spatter?
I thought the best scenes in season six were very early on, when they showed the black-and-white images of all those zombies trapped in the canyon. I thought that was a pretty awesome visual.
…tough job for a writer to do high-quality work season after season. I mean how many shows can you name that stayed good past five seasons? Not too many.
w
v
wvParticipantWhy is society so dismissive of sexual assault, our rape culture and women in general?
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/13/donald-trump-assault-allegations-women-jill-harth?CMP=share_btn_twPerhaps the media ignoring Bill Clinton raping and sexually assaulting women while Hildabeast went about destroying those same women had something to do with it?
Or Bill Clinton getting oral sex in the Oval office from a 22 year old intern?
Or how about Obama presenting his erection to the ladies in the press corps on his campaign jet?
Or Michelle Obama inviting openly misogynist hip hop artists to the White House to perform and honor them?
To insinuate anything about Trump is the height of hypocrisy.
—————-
Well, setting aside the Clinton/Trump thing (if thats possible) what about the points the article made. Do you agree with the writer or do you see it differently?
Not everything is about Hillary. Or Bill. Or Obama. Or Trump. Right?
w
v
wvParticipantI agree with all that.
I also agree that its hard to ‘get that across’ to men. For all kinds of reasons
its a hard dynamic to communicate to men.w
vOctober 13, 2016 at 9:31 am in reply to: LePage says Trump needs to use 'authoritarian' power #55139
wvParticipantOctober 12, 2016 at 5:14 pm in reply to: LePage says Trump needs to use 'authoritarian' power #55085
wvParticipantOne wonders just how LaPage got elected in Maine. Looks like, in part, it was cause his opponents split the vote.
w
vHow the confounding victory of Maine’s Paul LePage helps explain the national GOP wave.
By Colin Woodard
November 05, 2014
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/11/paul-lepage-craziest-governor-reelection-112583#ixzz4MuMGEPt7
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on FacebookFor years now, whenever someone would draw up a list of the most vulnerable incumbent governors in the country, Maine’s Paul LePage would be right near the top. Pugnacious, hot-headed, and occasionally vulgar, LePage was consistently underwater with his approval ratings, especially after he would make national headlines for telling the state chapter of the NAACP to kiss his butt or television viewers everywhere that a Democratic state senator always wanted to “give it to the people without Vaseline.”
And then there was last week’s kerfuffle over an Ebola quarantine that saw the governor lose a stare-down with a bicycling nurse.
National pundits thought the Republican—an extreme conservative in a famously moderate state—had little chance of being reelected, particularly as he had won office the first time with less than 38 percent of the vote when he narrowly defeated a little-known independent in a five-way contest at the height of the Tea Party wave in 2010.
Yet yesterday, LePage won reelection by about four points—the final results aren’t yet in—defeating a popular six-term congressman, Mike Michaud.
Even on a night when voters from east to the west, in just about every time zone, elected new Republican leaders—and even on a night when Republicans won more gubernatorial races than expected—Paul LePage’s victory confounds at first glance.
How on earth did one of America’s least popular and most divisive governors get reelected?
Half of the answer is the same way LePage won in 2010, by his opponents splitting the vote between candidates. Eliot Cutler, the lawyer and one-time Carter administration official who nearly beat him in 2010, ran again, this time much less successfully, and polls indicated that about two-thirds of his supporters would otherwise back Michaud.
Polling in the low teens in the final weeks of the campaign, Cutler was under enormous pressure to bow out, especially after the Republican Governors Association started buying ads promoting his candidacy in strategic effort to undermine Michaud. But at a hastily-organized press conference Oct. 29, Cutler sent mixed messages, defiantly proclaiming he would stay in while noting that he had little chance of winning and that, therefore, was urging his supporters to vote for one of his rivals if “compelled by their fears or by their conscience.” The message was so muddled the campaign had to release a FAQ to explain what the candidate had and had not said, but that didn’t stop some of his most prominent supporters—like popular two-term governor and current U.S. Sen. Angus King—to publically switch their endorsements Michaud.
Paul LePage’s Greatest Hits“Sen. Jackson claims to be for the people, but he’s the first one to give it to the people without providing Vaseline.” To WMTW-TV in Portland, Maine
“If you want a good education, go to private schools. If you can’t afford it, tough luck. You can go to the public school.” At an education panel hosted by a community college
“And as your governor, you’re gonna be seeing a lot of me on the front page saying ‘Gov. LePage tells Obama to go to hell.’” During his 2010 campaign
“What I am trying to say is the Holocaust was a horrific crime against humanity and, frankly, I would never want to see that repeated. Maybe the IRS is not quite as bad—yet.” To Vermont’s 7 Days
In the end, over 8 percent of voters cast ballots for Cutler, sealing Michaud’s fate.
But a third-party spoiler only got LePage part of the way back to Blaine House, the historic Maine governor’s mansion. After all, for most of his time in office, LePage’s job approval rating was in the mid-to-high thirties as his administration tangled first with the Republican legislative leaders (who refused to back his plan to roll all environmental laws back to weaker federal standards in 2010), then with Democratic ones (before whom the governor banned his commissioners from appearing). The governor had become a national joke, and many Mainers had come to regard him as an embarrassment.
It’s the other half of the answer to LePage’s reelection that helps explain the GOP’s remarkable success in races across the country: A disciplined campaign, a socially conservative and economic-focused message, and surprisingly strong rural turnout boosted by local issues. Add to that a touch of the national unease and unhappiness with Barack Obama—who won Maine in 2008 and 2012, both times by nearly 15 points—and you have all the ingredients for a national GOP wave that dwarfed even some of the most optimistic party projections.
It turns out that many Mainers embraced the key goals of LePage’s governorship: cutting taxes, environmental and labor regulations, welfare services, and public spending—supposedly among the principal obstacles to improving the state’s economy, which has been sluggish for the past 150 years or so. He’s delivered on many of those promises, signing a $150 million tax cut, the largest in state history, which reduced the top income tax rate and doubled the estate tax exemption from $1 million to $2 million. He refused to expand Medicaid, vetoing five legislative bills to do so, imposed a five-year limit on welfare benefits, and vigorously investigated welfare fraud and abuse—allegedly to stop Maine from being a welfare “destination state.” He also repealed laws restricting big box stores and mining.
Despite his potty mouth, he’s also attractive to social conservatives, who appreciate his opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage, which distinguished him from both his rivals. His life story is also appealing to many: the eldest of 18 in an impoverished working class family, he ran away from an abusive father at age 11, lived on the streets for a time, and with the help of a sequence of benign businesspeople, succeeded in going to college and become a successful manager. When charged with fighting a war on the poor, he is able to argue he knew more about being poor than most of his critics.
He also managed to keep himself in check in recent months, avoiding major gaffes and confrontations and even joking about his past indiscretions, saying at one debate “ even a Frenchman can be taught to cool down.” One of his campaign’s slogans was “actions speak louder than words.” In debates and public appearances he appeared relaxed, confident, and unbowed. Nationally, Republicans followed his lead; after tossing away chances in recent years with comments like Todd Akin’s “legitimate rape” explanation, there was hardly a word nationally off-message.
Then there’s the unusually high turnout yesterday—perhaps as high as 60 percent—which benefited the governor. This may have been prompted by a pressing public policy issue: whether Mainers should be prevented from feeding donuts to bears. A campaign to ban the practice of baiting bears with pastries and other garbage—and then letting hunters shoot them—may have mobilized large numbers of rural voters who tend to appreciate hunting and the “plain spoken” LePage. (The ballot measure was defeated, by the way, by some five points—about the same as LePage’s margin of victory.)
Democrats had hoped their nominee, Mike Michaud, would have been able to eat into LePage’s base in the mill towns and rural settlements that comprise much of interior Maine. Michaud, after all, was a mill worker himself, and drove a forklift on a paper mill floor until only a few years ago. A native of small paper mill town built in the forests of northern Maine, Michaud never attended college, but managed to become the president of the state senate and a six-term congressman representing the more rural “have not” of the state’s two congressional districts.
But Michaud is a poor public speaker and gave uninspiring performances in televised debates. He also came out as gay early in the campaign and, in contrast to his earlier positions when he was a state legislator, supports abortion rights and same-sex marriage. All of this may have played a role in his subpar performance in many of the communities that had sent him to Congress by wide margins, even against conservative challengers. Early this morning, the Associated Press called his empty House seat for Bruce Poliquin, an arch-conservative LePage ally who didn’t even live in the district until the campaign began.
And finally, LePage had the national tide in his favor, which swept away Democrats across the country, and gave the GOP a new toehold in New England. Republicans also seized control of the Maine state senate yesterday and made gains in the house, just two years after being swept from both chambers. “What we’ve done tonight in America transcends me and every other governor,” LePage said in his victory speech a few hours ago. “What it is, it’s about the American people. We have spoken. We’ve said enough is enough.”
Apparently not in Maine’s case. Voters here have decided they haven’t yet had enough of Paul LePage.
link:http://theramshuddle.com/topic/lepage-says-trump-needs-to-use-authoritarian-power/#new-post
wvParticipantDoes anyone know WHY Quinn didnt play? Is it the back again?
It’s not the back.
Quinn is listed with a shoulder injury, one he suffered Sunday before re-entering the game.
And to answer the question, can they win without Quinn?
Quinn went out last year after the Chicago game. That was week 10.
The defense wasn’t the same, but whether they won depended on a lot of things, including who the qb was. So after he went out, they lost the Baltimore game with Keenum and then lost Keenum. Two more games, Foles was the qb and they lost both, in hyper miserable, beat down fashion.
Keenum came back in week 14. And then interestingly they won against Detroit without Quinn. As you know at that point, including the Lions game, they went 3-1.
So with Keenum but without Quinn they went 3-2. That includes a win in Seattle.
It’s not ideal but they can apparently dial up enough to win some. But needless to say it’s better with Quinn.
.
..
——————-
Well, what about Quinn AND/OR Brockers And/or Hayes playing hurt.
Can they win then?
w
v
wvParticipantNo.
That Buff loss really hurts. 4-1 would have given us some breathing room.
If Quinn, Brockers and Hayes are still out, then we will lose at Detroit. This D line is too important. Losing Tru just makes it worse. Stafford will eat our lunch if we can’t pressure him.
————–
Yeah, and its not whether Q, B and H “play” or not. Its whether they are healthy and play. We all remember how ineffective Q was when he played hurt last year.
Does anyone know WHY Quinn didnt play? Is it the back again?
w
v
wvParticipantnot consistently.
not consistently enough to make the playoffs.
probably another 7 win season without him.
—–
Yeah, thats how it looks to me too.
Can you imagine, how the fans will feel if they win 7 again 🙂
w
v
wvParticipantInteresting. So, Papua New Guinea has a better system than the US.
w
v“….IRV has the effect of avoiding split votes when multiple candidates earn support from like-minded voters. For example, suppose there are two similar candidates A & B, and a third opposing candidate C, with vote totals of 35% for candidate A, 25% for B and 40% for C. In a plurality voting system, candidate C may win with 40% of the votes, even though 60% of electors prefer either A or B. Alternatively, voters are pressured to choose the seemingly stronger candidate of either A or B, despite personal preference for the other, in order to help ensure the defeat of C. With IRV, the electors backing B as their first choice can rank A second, which means candidate A will win by 60% to 40% over C despite the split vote in first choices.
Instant-runoff voting is used in national elections in several countries. For example, it is used to elect members of the Australian House of Representatives and most Australian state legislatures,[1] the President of India, members of legislative councils in India, the President of Ireland,[2] and the parliament in Papua New Guinea. The system is also used in local elections around the world, as well as by some political parties (to elect internal leaders) and private associations. IRV is described in Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (under the name “preferential voting”).[3]
October 11, 2016 at 8:38 pm in reply to: Dont start a conversation by calling someone an Idiot #55037
wvParticipantlink:http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/07/nation/la-na-evangelical-warming-20111207
Spreading the global warming gospel
A climatologist in West Texas takes on skeptics with scientific data — and her own faith as an evangelical Christian.December 07, 2011|
By Neela Banerjee, Los Angeles TimesReporting from Lubbock, Texas
When Katharine Hayhoe was faced with telling a group of petroleum engineers in the heart of the Texas oil patch that the main culprit for climate change is humanity’s consumption of fossil fuels, she expected pushback.
“Aren’t you scientists just in this for the money?” one older man asked — the latest insult after a string of anonymous emails asserting that she and other climatologists were corrupt liars.
Most climatologists refuse to answer skeptics, preferring to let the research speak for itself. Hayhoe is one of a small but growing number of scientists willing to engage climate change doubters face to face. Unlike most of her colleagues, she is driven as much by the tenets of her faith as the urgency of the science.
A rising star among climatologists, Hayhoe, the daughter of missionaries, is also an evangelical Christian. Though the science supporting climate change grows ever more compelling, fewer Americans now accept the scientific consensus than they did three years ago. No group is more resistant than political conservatives, especially white evangelical Christians, who often say that climate change is a hoax.
Besides teaching at Texas Tech in Lubbock, conducting research and writing, Hayhoe meets with Christian colleges, church groups, senior citizens, professional associations and just about anyone else to explain that Earth’s climate is changing and that human beings are behind it.
Like any climatologist, she is armed with data. Yet Hayhoe also speaks of climate change in a language to which conservative Christians can relate, about protecting God’s creation and loving one’s neighbors. Hayhoe is a climate change evangelist in the West Texas Bible Belt, compelled by her faith to protect the least among us by sharing what she knows, even if it’s science that many around her reject.
“People ask me if I believe in global warming. I tell them, ‘No, I don’t,’ because belief is faith; faith is the evidence of things not seen,” Hayhoe said. “Science is evidence of things seen. To have an open mind, we have to use the brains that God gave us to look at the science,” she said.
Hayhoe, who serves as a reviewer for the main United Nations report on climate change, focuses her work on understanding and communicating the complex effects expected from climate change.
“She is perhaps the best communicator on climate change,” said John Abraham, associate professor of thermal sciences at the University of St. Thomas and founder of the Climate Science Rapid Response Team, an information clearinghouse.
One brisk, windy morning recently, Hayhoe took the stage at Wayland Baptist University, a small school about an hour from Lubbock.
“We have parents and communities who have a natural tendency to distrust science, and that’s unfortunate,” said Herbert Grover, dean of Wayland’s school of math and science. “We asked Katharine to come because we wanted to take full advantage of her credentials as a scientist and as a Christian.”
She tells the 300 students in sweats and Uggs that even if they ignore thermometers, scientists and data, they can still see the impact of climate change beyond their windows. An epic drought has gripped Texas, with climate change likely worsening the low rainfall that comes with the La Nina weather pattern in the region.
“A one- or two-degree increase in the world’s temperature may not seem like much,” she tells the students in the chilly auditorium, most paying attention rather than sleeping or texting. “But think of your own body when your temperature goes up by one and a half degrees. It means you’re getting sick.”
Hayhoe, 39, moved to Texas six years ago when her husband, Andrew Farley, was hired as a professor of linguistics at Texas Tech and as pastor of Ecclesia, a small evangelical church in Lubbock. Brought in to Texas Tech’s geoscience department, Hayhoe now teaches in the political science department, because, she said, “climate change is a very political science in West Texas.”
A Canadian, Hayhoe’s first efforts as a climate change evangelist focused on her skeptic husband: Like many American evangelicals, Farley grew up thinking that environmentalism was a leftist cause. “I saw climate change as the same as saving the whales, hugging trees and wearing hemp,” he said.
As Hayhoe’s reputation grew, several of Farley’s close friends voiced disapproval of her research, and he raised objections too. To answer Farley’s questions, Hayhoe showed him data that reveal, for instance, how Earth’s temperature has risen markedly after the Industrial Revolution — as the combustion of fossil fuels grew.
Hayhoe’s success in changing other minds has been uneven.
Her book for evangelicals, “A Climate for Change,” sells tepidly because Christian bookstores won’t stock it. At a senior citizen center in Lubbock, a man shaking with rage shouted an expletive-studded monologue about how the greenhouse effect doesn’t exist. At a talk for Texas Tech business school students, her arguments were simply dismissed. At the end of any given talk, perhaps one person might tell Hayhoe she’s convinced him of the scientific consensus on global warming.
Lately, though, something may have shifted. At a recent talk at Wayland Baptist, no one was rude, and Rick Ross, a 21-year-old math major, told Hayhoe she had inspired him to “go out and do something.”
Hayhoe was surprised. “What was that all about?” she said to Grover, her host, as they gathered her things after her last talk of the day. “Nobody challenged me? Maybe those people didn’t come.”
wvParticipantWell, i dont think i need to explain to anyone what will happen
if the Rams have to play with a backup-QB, three limping DLinemen and only one starting caliber CB.I think we’d best savor this winning record while we can. 🙂
w
v
wvParticipantWell, only three of the four DLine starters
were injured.Also, No rams were injured on the Pick6 play.
w
vOctober 11, 2016 at 8:09 pm in reply to: Dont start a conversation by calling someone an Idiot #55033
wvParticipantOk, I think i got it.
w
v
wvParticipantI could be confused — are we talking hair extension ?
What kind of extension are we talking about here.
w
v
wvParticipantI just hope Zooey isn’t the actual cause
of 8-10 type bullshit.
Season
1983 … 8-10
1984 … 10-8
1985 … 3-15
Totals … 22-34w
v
———-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Express_(USFL)
The Los Angeles Express drafted Dan Marino as the first pick in USFL history. Marino made some appearances on behalf of the Express before signing with the Miami Dolphins.The Express also made a serious run at Eric Dickerson, and actually matched the Los Angeles Rams’ offer for him. However, Dickerson signed with the Rams, apparently because family members were skeptical about the USFL.
Television star Lee Majors became part owner in April 1983.
The Express ownership lured Canadian Football League legend Hugh Campbell, head coach of the Edmonton Eskimos, to be their first head coach. (Campbell had taken over the Eskimos in 1977 and in his six years had taken the team to six straight Grey Cup games, winning the last five.)
The 1983 Express team was a competitive team headed by quarterbacks Tom Ramsey and Mike Rae and led by an above average defense. Despite losing two defensive backs to knee injuries, the Express finished fifth in the league in total defense.
However, a patchwork offensive line limited the team’s offensive firepower. The Express had the worst rushing attack in the league. (Herschel Walker rushed for 72 more yards than the entire Express team in 1983).
Upset losses to the New Jersey Generals and Washington Federals in weeks 16 and 17 respectively cost the Express the Pacific Division title and allowed the Oakland Invaders to claim the last 1983 playoff berth.
wvParticipantWell, i dunno what he deserves yet. But I’d like to see how the season plays out.
One factor is Goff’s education, and progress (or lack of it).
I’m not sure i want Goff to spend all this year learning one system,
and then having to learn a new system next year, with a new coach.w
v
wvParticipantThe Rams will likely have to win 10 or 11 games to get a wildcard. That means they’ll need to win 7 or 8 more games.
Here’s the remainder of the schedule…
@Det
NYG
Car
&NYJ
Mia
@NE
NO
Atl
@Sea
SF
ArzAre there 7 or 8 wins there?
————-
I got a feeling it will be more like 9 or 10, to get that last wildcard slot.Lots of parity, not a lot of good teams.
We’ll see.
The Rams will do the 7-9-bullshit thing again,
if Quinn aint back to full strength soon. His ability to constantly
bend around the edge like a great-black-shark,
while A.Donald threatens the middle just…changes things.w
v-
This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by
wv.
wvParticipantAs for HRC. She was basically steady, kinda boring, a bit too wonky. But she was at least coherent.
My guess is, Trump’s pre-debate stunt threw her off. She probably didn’t think even Mr. Vulgarian would go there. But he did…
————–
Well, i know Trump lost the public-defender-vote 🙂
I saw that he slammed crooked-hillary for representing an accused-person
while she was court-ordered by a judge to do the public-defender thing.…is there a word for… when things get so surreal that surrealizm gets ‘normalized’ ?
w
v
wvParticipantI know this is just wild-speculation on my part, but i suspect
it hurts the Rams chances of winning when the QB throws a Pick-Six.I oould be wrong.
I only saw the highlights, so i dunno what happened. I do know that if you told me
before the game that Quinn was not playing I’d have said it was a “pick’em” kind a game.To me, the picture that is emerging is this is a “wild-card level team”. I keep saying that,
but thats what i keep seeing. They will hang around the .500 mark for a while, i think.w
v
wvParticipantSchool scene:
wvParticipantWhen’s the last time you were at the Coliseum, Zooey?
w
vSummer of 1984. I had season tickets to the LA Express ($100 for nine regular season home games, plus pre-season). The last game I attended was the longest game in professional football history – a playoff game against the Michigan Panthers that lasted 93 minutes before the Express won it. They had Steve Young, Jo Jo Townsell, Gary Zimmerman…among others.
—————
So, you’ve never really
been a ram fan, then have ya.Maybe you should just change
yer avatar to the EXPRESS.w
v
wvParticipantexcerpt:
“….We don’t want them to go back to the bush.” But a couple of days ago, in Uribe’s stronghold city of Medellín, a local man told me that he planned to vote No because that was precisely where he wanted the guerrillas to remain: “We don’t want them in the city. Let them stay in the bush.” Another Colombian man e-mailed an appeal for me to understand why he had voted No: “It’s hard to forgive.”
Shortly after the vote count came in, a young Colombian woman, crushed to tears by the No win, told me, “Uribe is like Colombia’s Voldemort.” She and some of her friends were also dismayed by the low voter turnout, of around thirty-seven per cent, and talked about leaving the country. “First Brexit, now this,” she said. “This means Trump is going to win in the United States. What will you do?”.
—————–w
v
wvParticipantWhen’s the last time you were at the Coliseum, Zooey?
w
v
wvParticipantBill Maher on the trump shit-storm.
Yeah. How is Gary Johnson polling higher than Jill Stein?
Gary Johnson has no idea what the fuck is happening anywhere. He couldn’t find Canada on a map if you erased every continent but North America.
——————–
I saw a couple of confusing-articles that indicated that Johnson actually takes
more voters away from Clinton than from Trump. It surprised me.The article didnt say who the pussy-grabbers were voting for this year. I’m guessing they are leaning toward Jill.
w
v
wvParticipant——————————-
“… Fisher said, adding that run-game problems have “nothing to do with Todd, whatsoever. It’s just a matter of getting him some opportunities.”Offensive coordinator Rob Boras said it was “an ongoing process” to figure out ways to get Gurley going. “We’re taking a look at everything,” he said. “Schematically, play calls, our technique at the point of attack, our decisions.”
———————-Interesting.
w
v -
This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

