Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wv
ParticipantI have been listening to the “Fall of Civilizations” podcase on Spotify. Very interesting. Each episode is on a different empire, and there are some EMPIRES I’ve never heard of. I just finished the Aztecs this morning. Most episodes are about 2 hours long. The next episode just happens to be “Han Dynasty.”
Yeah, and there are some Empires that should have been,
but never were. Like the GSOT.
w
v
wv
ParticipantFrom the info net:
Maypop (Passiflora incarnata) is native to North America and hardy to USDA Hardiness Zone 6.
I’m zone 5 so as it happens I am a stranger to this plant.
I thought you were a cover 2 guy. Cover 5 seems a bit soft to me.
w
v
wv
ParticipantOne of the native (to WV) flowers I grow is Passion Flower. Its a vine and the blooms are purty cool, if you’ve never seen one.
June 25, 2023 at 9:12 pm in reply to: the 2023 OL thread (w/ definitive article posted on 5/30) #144453wv
Participant== Question — When’s the last time the Rams used their first pick for an Interior Offensive Lineman? I cant remember that ever happening. w v
The times Rams have used a first pick for an OL. A couple of times are surprises because their first pick was a low one. They have a lot of first round “first picks” but most of them are either busts or disappointments or underperformers, which is why they’re forgettable. I will red-bold all the busts and forgettables and underperformers. I only went back to 66 (Tom Mack). 2023: Avila, round 2 2022: Bruss, round 3 2018: Noteboom, round 3 2014: Robinson, round 1 2009: Smith, round 1 2005: Barron, round 1 1997: Pace, round 1 1994: Gandy, round 1 1990: Brostek, round 1 1986: Schad, round 1 1966: Mack, round 1 Here’s a time defying Rams “all bad picks” OL: Barron Robinson Brostek Schad Smith
==
Ha. Well, Im an idiot. The last time the Rams used their top pick for an Interior Olineman was — last year. Bruss.
Ok, well, they are stocking up, arent they.
w
v
wv
Participant— gaijingirl2004 Bronx Leftist/Green. 🦺 🇵🇸✡️ (@gaijingirl2004) June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023 at 7:28 pm in reply to: the 2023 OL thread (w/ definitive article posted on 5/30) #144450wv
Participantthey can finish in that 9-7 zone.
It’s hard to adjust to the 17 game schedule, ain’t it. (Friendly tease, not a taunt.) One thing I notice about the McV Rams. Look at all the players who made some noise and did some things with the Rams, eventually became FAs who walked and…then did nothing. I just think they might be a bit bigger than the sum of their parts. Who did the Rams have on offense when they had their best seasons? Gurley–till the knee. Woods, who then didn’t do anything after leaving. Kupp. The McV Rams were never as loaded as the Bruce, Holt, Faulk Rams. But still they are 46/18 in years with a relatively healthy OL, and that includes 2 super bowl appearances. In the other 2 years they are 14/19. Now of course that’s not some kind of written in stone, sure-thing formula because there are variables such as having Whitworth before and finding a new LOT now. Anyway. One of the things they’re doing with the OL in 23 is bulking up the interior, not only to give the running game more juice, but to give Stafford a pocket to step up in. I think if relatively healthy the Rams are about a 10 win team, maybe more.
==
Question — When’s the last time the Rams used their first pick for an
Interior Offensive Lineman?
I cant remember that ever happening.
w
v
June 24, 2023 at 8:11 pm in reply to: the 2023 OL thread (w/ definitive article posted on 5/30) #144438wv
ParticipantMcV’s 2 worst seasons–2019 and 2022–have this in common. Both years were marred by extensive OL injuries. It got settled down in 2019 toward the end because youngsters like Edwards came through in the last stretch. In 2022 the young replacements got injured too (!
). Overall in all the other years, when the OL was relatively healthy (only 1 or 2 replacements during the season and never multiple replacements at the same time)…we know they were always contenders. Every other year except those 2 the OL was solid. There are promising guys on the OL roster. Beyond Avila and Hav, we know about Jackson and Shelton. Anchrum has always gotten good buzz and impresses people. I don’t know about Noteboom or Allen. Bruss is an unknown at this point but he seems to be tending positive.
I’d probly put it more or less, like this: The OLine health determines if the Rams will be above or below .500. If its solid, they can finish in that 9-7 zone. If its a mess, they can sink all the way to 4 wins or so. I think we all agree on this.
Now, if they wanna be above that 9-7 wild-card-zone. Then they need more than just the OLine to be solid. They need speed, and weaponry, and Stafford to be healthy, and the defense to stop the run, etc, etc.
It dont look to ‘me’ like they have the players to move into the 11 or 12 win zone. But IF the Oline stays solid then 9-7 is reachable.
But I dunno.
If Puka turns out to be a real NFL weapon, it could make a difference in a game or two.
w
v
wv
Participant“…I’m reconvinced Stafford is a top-10 QB…”
Stuff like this makes me tilt my head. I dont know why anyone ever doubts this, after the show he put on in 2021. It was a clutch a performance as I’ve ever seen.
AND, it was…oh, i dont know how to phrase it exactly, but it was…”aggressive-clutch.” Ya know. It wasnt some sorta dink-and-dunk clutch.
Top 10? Really? Anybody doubt that?
Top 5 in my book.
w
v
wv
ParticipantWell, Odell might have been the best Offensive player on the field that day,
but a guy named Donald was gonna be the best player.
w
v
wv
ParticipantThe answer to all of your questions is, “16-0, baby!” That applies even though there are now 17 games each season. Whatever happened to Old Hacker, anyway? Did he ride off into the sunset on his John Deere?
I dunno. But I woulda liked to see a Monday Night broadcast team, composed of RFL, Old Hacker and Karl Marx.
w
v
wv
ParticipantTiers. Well, I would put Mahomes in a category by himself. He is the most valuable player in the NFL and the best QB.
But I’ve got Stafford in the next Tier along with a handful of others. IF, he’s healthy.
Course, you can say the ‘if he’s healthy’ thing about any of the QBs, including Mahomes.
Btw, I’m gonna give the folks who made that Tier-graphic the benefit of the doubt and assume they dropped Stafford to Tier 4, just because of the injury-situation. I ‘would’ agree he is a ‘question mark’ because of that. Maybe they need a ‘question mark tier’.
w
v
wv
ParticipantThis is how humans fight climate disaster:
Your 'moment of doom' for June 4, 2023 ~ An industry of pure waste.
"As efforts to delay the devastating impact of global warming continue to emerge…designers attempted to offer a range of solutions in their latest collections for the Fall/Winter 2023."https://t.co/chsXPdzcLM
— Prof. Eliot Jacobson (@EliotJacobson) June 4, 2023
wv
ParticipantRetaining McVay. Well, that may be true, I dunno. Mc-Snead, in five years, brought the Rams an NFC championship (tainted by the pass-interference noncall) and a big beautiful Super Bowl Ring.
So, I’m always gonna be on team-Mc-Snead. Mc-Snead and DV-MM. The two best combos during my ram-years. (post 1968)
But this will be a most inter esting year for Mc-Snead. What can they do when they dont have superior talent? Can they put together a team we all ‘like’, that plays scrappy, intelligent, hard-nosed football? The bar is a little low this year, we all know that. The bar is at 8-8. Can they surprise us, and put together a winner?
Its a big year for McSnead.
w
v
wv
ParticipantPolice under capitalism: “…call the corporate office”
w
v
wv
ParticipantCertainly by some measures, he was the ‘best NFL player, ever’. For starters, i dont know of any NFL player that created so much distance between the best and the second best player.
Seemed like there was a consensus he was the best, and the second-best was nowhere in sight of Jim Brown.
w
v
wv
ParticipantNot a fan. Seems like a very average player to me.
I dunno.
w
v
May 14, 2023 at 6:47 pm in reply to: 2023 schedule & strength of schedule (schedule’s here now) #144155wv
ParticipantFirst three weeks: Seahawks, 49ers, Bengals.
Damn.
I like it.
w
v
wv
ParticipantIf they were to actually hit on a solid WR in the 5th round, it would do wonders for the offense.
Nakua sounds intriguing.
4.57 forty isnt so bad.
w
v
wv
ParticipantWell, I dunno. I think they are in that great mass of teams that are in the 7, 8 or 9 win territory.
I dont think they can be better than that with only one scary weapon on offense, and only one scary weapon on defense.
Who knows, though. All things are Possible.
w
v
wv
Participant“…The word Snead used to describe Blackburn throughout the pre-draft process (it’s not a real word, but typically Snead): “Thorough-cus. … Thorough plus focused.”…..”
==
I dont dislike Les, but his southern-down-homey-schtick mixed with
the corporate-jargon, often makes me ill. I’m just being Blonest.(blunt and honest)
w
v
wv
Participant“They didn’t have to reload in 2023 but IMO deciding to do so was very smart. Though…it had better work…”
==
Not sure what you mean by ‘reload,’ zn. Does reload mean ‘make a run’ next season, or take a down-season and ‘reload’ in 2024?
w
v
wv
ParticipantI dont know enough to have a ‘take.’
In general, I just dont see a lot of ‘playmakers’ on this team. No Von Millers, Jalen Ramseys, OBJ’s, etc.
I dunno what the ‘identity’ (as they say) of this team will be. What are they?
…So they are sick and tired of the quick passing games beating them? Well, thats nice to know, but at this stage I’d be happy if they can just stop the run this season. Can they?
w
v
wv
ParticipantGreat to hear from you, Jim.
w
v
wv
ParticipantAlmost as much as when they got rid of Chris Massey in 2011, after he “made clean snaps on 702 out of 703 attempts including a run of 528 consecutive clean snaps.”
Massey was great up until he hurt his hand and then refused to wear a glove. That’s why his final 175 snaps were far from perfect.
—
As i recall, you were leading the “massey is a figurehead” chorus.
At least now you concede, without massey, Bulger would have been nothing.
w
v
wv
ParticipantHow much cap room would the Rams have if they got rid of everybody? Probably a lot.
–
Yeah, probly a lot. Almost as much as when they got rid of Chris Massey in 2011,
after he “made clean snaps on 702 out of 703 attempts including a run of 528 consecutive clean snaps.”
w
v
wv
ParticipantThey guy was so productive in Chicago. Major disappointment in LA. I have not heard any scoops on just what the f happened with him.
w
v
April 15, 2023 at 12:37 pm in reply to: Do you guys make this trade? Kupp to the Giants for . . . #143481wv
ParticipantI love the connection tween stafford and kupp. Its a rare thing.
As long as stafford is playing, i would never trade kupp. They are more like one thing to me: stafford-kupp.
Not time for a complete overhaul, imho. Try and draft well, and see what the Oline really is, and reassess after this season.
w
v
wv
ParticipantDaniel Snyder. What a complete disaster that man is. I mean it is really hard to stand out as a weasel among all those other owner-weasels. But he has managed it.
w
v
wv
ParticipantNo ring without Odell. Good team-mate, it seemed. Turned his career around, and made the Rams offense good enough to win the Ring.
w
v
wv
ParticipantThe darker blue and deep yellow of the mid to late 80’s was a beautiful thing. pic.twitter.com/AqBPh7mTFb
— Stu Onzz (@StuOnzz) March 19, 2023
Now that is a good looking uniform.
w
v
-
AuthorPosts