Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 691 through 720 (of 11,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is this a rebuild situation? Yes, no, maybe? #141712
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Anybody else think playing stafford is stupid?

    I know Stafford would demand to play — and I’d say No.

    This season is over.  Next season is not.  Yet.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: around the league, week 10 & aftermath #141687
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    At the moment the playoffs in the NFC look like:

     

    Division Winners: Vikings, Eagles, Seahawks, Bucs

    Wildcards: Giants, Cowboys, 49ers.

    in reply to: Kupp’s injury #141683
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    If Kupp cant play, I really dont wanna see Stafford out there, either.

    This could be like watching the 97 Rams offense.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Arizona game #141671
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I got no real criticisms of McV or the coaches.

    Just looks like:

    1. massive injuries
    2. Key personnel losses: Von Miller, OBJ, Whitworth
    3. And a go-for-it-now(2021) gamble (which paid off last year.)

     

    I just dont have much of an ’emotional’ reaction to this year, because of the Ring they won last year.   That Ring just makes up for a LOT with me.   Probly be two more years before i start bitching.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Arizona game #141653
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Will they win another game?

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: Stafford out #141597
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dunno about you guys, but I’m starting to doubt they can

    run it back.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: Akers #141508
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I’m not sure i remember a situation quite like the Akers thing.

    I dont have the slightest idea what the disagreement is between Akers and McVay.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: around the league, week 8 games & aftermaths #141460
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    That was one of the worst helmet-to-helmets I’ve seen, ever.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: our takes on the 9ers game #141457
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It’s not the same team, for sure. A boatload of OL injuries. Yes not having Miller, OBJ, & Whitworth. But that 2021 Rams playoff team was the real thing. They beat Tampa, SF, and then Cinn, all with 4th quarter comebacks. What this team is reduced to now is no reflection on what they were then . Including the super bowl, in the last 8 games the Rams have played 3 LOTs, 7 OGs, and 3 OCs. No offense looks good under those conditions.

    ==

    Agreed.

    w

    v

    in reply to: our takes on the 9ers game #141439
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, to state the obvious the rams are not an elite NFL team.

    Can they win more than they lose this year?  I dunno.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/23 – 10/25 #141380
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: other games during the bye #141341
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Chiefs offense shredded the 49er defense.

    w

    v

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #141340
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Image

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/17 – 10/20 #141301
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    At 3-3 in the NFC West the rams are “in a good spot,”

    unfortunately they also have too many fatal flaws to be serious contenders for a Ring.

    Pass-Rush, OLine, WR, RB — too long a list.

    Some of that will improve, but not enough of it.

    And god help them if Stafford or Kupp go down.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: around the league, game 6 & after #141230
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I thought the difference in the Chief-Buffalo game this time around was Von Miller.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: Our reactions to the Panthers game #141201
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    As bad as  Noteboom has been, is it an overall plus or minus that he’s gone?

    in reply to: Our reactions to the Panthers game #141191
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Another pick-6.  Teams dont usually overcome pick-6s.

    A broken team beat a bad team.

    I’ll take it.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #141147
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Image

    in reply to: Hey wv ram #141141
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Thats great, Jack.

    I believe WVU is still the “no.1 party school”

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: Rams OL #141136
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Man.  We knew losing Whitworth was gonna be problematic but Noteboom has never played ‘this’ bad, has he?    Wtf.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/10 -10/13 #141122
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It’s not an entirely fair or valid comparison because in 2007, while their OL was damaged early and often, the Rams could still run the ball with Jackson in most of the first 5 games. In their first 5 games of 2007, the Rams had 458 yards rushing, including 2 100+ yard games, with an average of 90.9 yards per game. Jackson just made a difference, you had to defend him no matter what, so there was less pressure by a certain small percentage. In 2022, it’s 312 yards rushing in 5 games, or an avg. of 62.5 yards per game. That of course means a bit more pressure. In 2022, teams, as we know and can clearly see, can afford to play pass first against the Rams without defending the run the way you would if they had an in-his-prime Jackson. That basically averages out to 2.4 more pressures per game in 2022 as opposed to 2007, fwiw.

    ==

    So, yer saying McVay is just a figure-head then?

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/10 -10/13 #141120
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “The Rams’ 84 pressures given up through five weeks is their most in the PFF-era. Closest was the 2007 Rams that allowed 72.”

     

    I mean, what can ya say.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Dallas game #141119
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Oline.   I got nuthin other than the obvious.  Oline.

     

    w

    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Looks like another ugly loss to me.   I cant pick the Rams to win against any team with a top 15 D-Line.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: injuries going into game 5 #141025
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Jeezus.   Stafford is gonna get killed.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #141010
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #141008
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Missed the game, and i dont wanna watch the low-lites.

     

    Looks like the season depends on whether McV can patch together

    a decent OLine.

     

    I hate to see a great vet-QB battered all year.   Not a good plan.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: around the league, week 3 games & aftermath #140909
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    skip to the bayless segment (cant believe i just typed that) and listen to him give

    the percentages of black coaches and the positions they coach.  Its like, 80 percent of RB coaches are black but 90 percent of QB coaches are white, etc.

     

    in reply to: around the league, week 3 games & aftermath #140896
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I picked the Lions to win their division.  Just watched the hi-lites of their loss against the Vikings.   Detroit had that game and totally blew it.

    They are an exciting team.   Only weakness Sunday was their run-defense.

    Goff looked good.   Still there is something about Goff’s pocket-presence that is not a match for Stafford.   I cant quite even describe what i am talking about.

     

    w

     

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #140892
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

Viewing 30 posts - 691 through 720 (of 11,046 total)