Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 126 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anyone giving Seattle a chance over Carolina? #16014
    znhater
    Blocked

    Ravens, broncos, chickens and green bay. With Baltimore and the pack in the bowl.

    in reply to: Go Pats #16012
    znhater
    Blocked

    Well all States have competency requirements
    for Jurors. In other words you cant be
    batshit-crazy and serve on a Jury.
    Ipso Facto, saying “Go Pats” is a
    sign of mental illness or possibly even
    moral turpitude.

    w
    v

    Thanks for plowing through the legalese.

    So, basically, you are saying that by living in NE, and force fed all- things-Patriots, I happen to live in an area overpopulated by lunatics and/or lowlife scum?

    He just making a joke the juror was crazy for liking the pats. The scum would be the patriots themselves lol.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by znhater.
    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15773
    znhater
    Blocked

    Maybe this whole thread is a bad idea.

    I’m sorry zn. I was just sharing the info. Didn’t know it was going blow up like this.

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15771
    znhater
    Blocked

    I don’t get why people are arguing. Does it matter where they play? I guess i was naive to think all posters have always been rams fans. I didn’t realize some people only became fans when they moved to st Louis. And for those people i am sorry if this happens.

    I live in Ohio, so when they moved i was happy. Even went down there that year and slept in my car to watch practice, which was rained out. They got me a hotel room, i had lunch with coach rich brooks and gm Steve Ortmeyer. It was a great time.

    They being said, i am kinda pumped that they are maybe going back. It brings back great memories of great rams teams of old. It will be interesting to see what happens.

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15625
    znhater
    Blocked

    Once a fan, always a fan is what i say. Don’t matter where they play.

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15595
    znhater
    Blocked

    goodness.

    i can’t see any logical reason to make me think that kroenke isn’t planning on moving to los angeles.

    and my guess is he moves whether or not the nfl approves of a move.

    Just like they did when they moved to st Louis. The nfl said no, Georgia got the lawyers out and the NFL caved.

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15589
    znhater
    Blocked

    yah beat me to it! LOL. No PA, don’t be silly. Why would Stan build an 80,000 seat stadium in LA to stay in STL in a Stadium he doesn’t own?

    Grits

    I was surprised u didn’t post it lol. But i got off work early this morning and put it up pretty early.

    in reply to: Bengals/Colts, Dallas/Lions #15526
    znhater
    Blocked

    My god, how obvious was that? I’ve been watching football over 40 years and never seen them pick up the flag after the call was made on the field. Normally, they converse first, then say no flag.

    Can we even trust football anymore? Just disgusting.

    znhater
    Blocked

    They have lost me. Can’t be optimistic after 11 years of losing. I bought it in 2006,2008,2011 and this season. I’ll believe it when i see it.

    Until the penalties and turnovers cease, this team will not improve.

    in reply to: Holmgren as 49ers coach? #15099
    znhater
    Blocked

    I heard they want Rex Ryan.

    in reply to: JT chat, 12/30 … transcript #15094
    znhater
    Blocked

    Rams4life wrote:
    Hazier akim? I assume he means Az Hakim. And he was twice the player tavon is at this point imo.

    I dunno. What if Tavon was playing alongside
    Faulk, Holt, Ike, Warner, etc ?

    w
    v

    As a returner, yes. But he’s not even close as a receiver.

    in reply to: JT chat, 12/30 … transcript #15082
    znhater
    Blocked

    Hazier akim? I assume he means Az Hakim. And he was twice the player tavon is at this point imo.

    in reply to: Reporters sum up 2014 #15041
    znhater
    Blocked

    Davin joseph.

    in reply to: Don Banks: Black Monday Primer #14789
    znhater
    Blocked

    Damn that guy earns his money. That’s alot of research and writing.

    in reply to: This is a poorly coached team. #14463
    znhater
    Blocked

    Well put RFL I agree. I hate to say it but the strangest thing happened watching the SEA AZ game. I think I’m now a Seahawks fan, I actually enjoyed watching them play in a way I haven’t enjoyed the Rams since 2003 and Fisher in his 3 years has sucked out every last bit of joy from watching the Rams play.

    What? U can’t even read that lol.

    in reply to: What's your "bet"? (feeling) (analysis)–Rams beat Giants? #14337
    znhater
    Blocked

    I think the rams have packed it in for the season. I wouldn’t be surprised if the lost although i want them to win.

    znhater
    Blocked

    Wow. 31 years. I was glued to the tv waiting for the traditional game break. Then it showed the kick and that is one of the best moments i remember as a fan.

    znhater
    Blocked

    It was the saints. But he didn’t become really good until he went to KC. Which ironicly Vermeil was the coach and he got rid of him when with the rams.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 11 months ago by znhater.
    znhater
    Blocked

    Kennison looked like he was going to be great his rookie year. Then he fell off the map until he resurrected his career in kc. To bad he didn’t keep it going through the gsot days.

    in reply to: How good is Shaun Hill? Hill after the last 5 games #14024
    znhater
    Blocked

    I think “sucks” is really strong and, in my humble opinion, should be reserved for the really poorest performing players…

    You know… like Scott Wells, who by almost any metric is about the worst starting Center in the entire NFL. Actually, he’s ranked 39th out of 40 and has spent time at the very bottom.

    Were it not for a couple of decent games, Davin Joseph would be right there with him.

    Hill, isn’t in that “sucks” Tier. Not as I define suckitude ™, anyway.

    Now, if you wanna just lash out at the QB who should be able to make plays no matter how the OL plays…well, then that’s just fandom stuff without much rational basis. It’s perfectly fine, but where you go, I cannot follow…

    I get that the line play was awful Thursday, but I’m talking about the San Diego game. The fumble was bad, but the goal line int was unforgivable imo. They at least have a tie with a chance to win in ot. I’ve seen enough of him to know i don’t want him starting a game. I would even go as far as saying i would start Davis the rest of the way and see what he has left. At least he has upside.

    in reply to: How good is Shaun Hill? Hill after the last 5 games #13957
    znhater
    Blocked

    Rams4life wrote:
    So now we are comparing Hill to Rodgers? Not a good comparison.

    Now, that’s not what I was saying and you know it.

    I was saying that if you are going to Grade a QB by how he performs against a D that routinely doesn’t allow QBs to perform well, then you’re going to get a skewed picture.

    I mean if Defense A allows opposing QBs an avg QB rating of only 56 and none higher than 63, than that means that they’ve been pretty successful at mitigating that position from having much success. So, grading ANY QB based solely on how they perform against THAT defense will give you a skewed outlook because very few defenses can accomplish this.

    My point in bringing up Aaron Rodgers was that he just happened to come up on one such defense. And it would be silly to judge HIM based on HIS performance against the Bills defense.

    I wasn’t saying that Rodgers and Hill were equals or even in the same Tier of QB. I was saying that REGARDLESS of Tier, QBs can and do have bad games against good defenses and to judge them solely based on THAT, when the entire league isn’t made up of such defenses is a bit disingenuous.

    Or to put it in your terms, if last week showed us how bad Hill can be, well okay, but it also showed us how bad Rodgers can be.

    The difference is that Rodgers has far more upside than Hill so that one game isn’t being over-considered. Hill has more talent than most fans give him credit.

    He has a winning record as a starting QB, for instance. Those same teams when not starting him? Badly losing record. He clearly improves those around him. So, Hill is a capable starter. Which he has proven again and again.

    Now, is he a franchise QB? No. But he’s certainly not worse than Trent Dilfer, for example, with whom the Ravens won a Super Bowl.

    Hill’s problem on Thursday night wasn’t Hill. It was exactly two people… Davin Joseph and Scott Wells. Had those two guys held up, we win that game.

    It’s really that simple. No QB wins with that much pressure in their face that often. Hill took shots that reminded me of Warner back there. He’s double tough. So I don’t really fault him for throwing a duck or two at the end of the game. The fact that he was standing at all should shock and amaze Rams fans.

    When was the last time we had a QB who could play even a lick who could take that kind of abuse? I mean since Bulger?

    Fair enough. But we are talking about a guy that’s been in the league for 13 years and has never been anyone’s starter. If u are saying the rams should bring him back to be the starter next season, i couldn’t disagree more. He may be tough as u say, but the team would just be setting themselves up to fail… Again.
    Same with Bradford. The rams need some new blood. These guys aren’t winning games. This isn’t the 80’s when u could start fringe players like Jeff kemp at QB and still make the playoffs with a strong running game and defense.
    I just want them to start winning again. Bottom line. Tired of being served the kool aide year in and year out only to get the same result for 10 years.

    in reply to: How good is Shaun Hill? Hill after the last 5 games #13948
    znhater
    Blocked

    So now we are comparing Hill to Rodgers? Not a good comparison.

    in reply to: qbs who have started for the Rams since the 1995 move #13906
    znhater
    Blocked

    Oh my bad. Thought u meant starters. In that case, u gotta include Dave Barr

    in reply to: qbs who have started for the Rams since the 1995 move #13904
    znhater
    Blocked

    Germaine never started a regular season game. U also forgot Scott Covington lol.

    in reply to: Who do you want to win this year? #13899
    znhater
    Blocked

    Anyone but NE

    No doubt.

    in reply to: How good is Shaun Hill? Hill after the last 5 games #13898
    znhater
    Blocked

    I’ll say this, if hill is the starter next season, the rams are in big trouble. I tried to get on the hill wagon, but last week showed how bad he can be. I think the rams could do much better and i really hope they do.

    in reply to: Next years scheduled teams #13774
    znhater
    Blocked

    Looks like 7-9 again. Can’t get a break on the schedule can they?

    in reply to: 7-9 again. Officially time to start talking draft. #13707
    znhater
    Blocked

    1. La’el Collins OT
    2. Cameron Erving OT **** Connor Cook QB

    3. Sean Mannion QB/LB

    5. LB/QB

    A. Resign Barksdale, Britt, and Hill for a total of $10 million.

    Here are my meager notes and some links

    http://walterfootball.com/draftdata.php

    http://walterfootball.com/draft2008P.php#2015positions

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft

    http://www.gbnreport.com/

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/an-early-look-at-the-nfl-draft-bob-mcginn/

    I like your thinking except re-signing Hill. I think he proved last night that the rams can do alot better. Or at least i hope they try.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 11 months ago by znhater.
    in reply to: race issues depressing #13594
    znhater
    Blocked

    Wow.

    in reply to: Local Sportswriters and the R word #13530
    znhater
    Blocked

    This has officially become a political post. Time to move it i think.

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 126 total)