Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2014 at 2:04 am in reply to: Ray Rice suspended cut by Ravens, Suspended indefinitely by NFL #6724
InvaderRam
Moderatorjust horrible. it’s not just goodell. members of the ravens organization saw this as well. maybe even harbaugh who said it was no big deal.
if ray rice is the only one who suffers from this, then it’s a travesty. other people need to be held responsible for the lies that have been told.
September 8, 2014 at 11:56 pm in reply to: Ray Rice suspended cut by Ravens, Suspended indefinitely by NFL #6717InvaderRam
Moderatorwell i think he needs help. unfortunately with his status. his actions have never had any consequences. i mean look at what the nfl did or didn’t do. frankly i find that more disturbing.
September 8, 2014 at 11:29 pm in reply to: Ray Rice suspended cut by Ravens, Suspended indefinitely by NFL #6714InvaderRam
Moderatorthey had all of the footage. if they didn’t. then they had access to it but chose to ignore it. bullshit if the nfl claims they didn’t have the opportunity to view the tapes.
InvaderRam
Moderatori don’t think they’re as bad as this sunday game showed.
but the inconsistency of this team is worrisome. maybe it’s just age.
biggest problem for this team is finding a qb.
i think the oline will be fine. the wrs will be fine. the running backs will be fine.
on defense. they’ll be fine. defensive line. linebackers. solid. the secondary should be fine. these coaches have a proven track record there, and they’ve looked solid so far. maybe a middle linebacker for the future.
so. my issues are with consistency. finding a quarterback.
if they can nail those two things, they’ll be fine because they do have a talented group there.
InvaderRam
Moderatorthat was amazing. looking forward to some more of that.
InvaderRam
Moderatorshoot why not? sign tim! how bad could it be?
InvaderRam
Moderatorwell rams need to draft a qb next year. high.
outside of hill they have nothing now. that’s a scary thought.
i see the offensive line improving. the running backs and wide receivers are in good shape. but they need a qb. long-term.
InvaderRam
Moderatori’m at a loss. i just expected a better result than this.
obviously, when hill went down, the chances of any kind of win went down the drain, but i expected something better than getting blown out at home.
i also think robinson needs to start soon. i have to believe that he could have made some difference in the running game. this offense is doomed without a running game.
the secondary was better than i expected which is a plus. i liked gaines and mcdonald. they were encouraging.
i’m also happy to see quick do well. hopefully, he can build on this.
InvaderRam
Moderatorto be fair. the rams won last season. atlanta? everyone assumed the rams had arrived. but it was just the same inconsistent rams.
this year. nothing has changed my mind about that. but. only game 1 so far. we’ll see.
InvaderRam
ModeratorI agree.
135 points per game would be awesome.
And only 4.7 points allowed?
That would be a dominant team, for sure.
yes. this.
that would be just fine.
-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
InvaderRam.
InvaderRam
Moderatori think he should be starting by the start of the second half of this season.
or i’ll be worried.
InvaderRam
Moderatoroooh.
who wants to make a bet a music video comes out at some point called “sack city”.
i shudder.
InvaderRam
Moderatorexcellent. then let’s improve it more. 135 and 4.7.
i think they should pattern themselves after the seahawks. strong running game and ypa.
edit. strong running game. and a strong yards per PASS attempt.
seahawks despite ranking very low in TOTAL yards per game passing had a strong yards per pass attempt.
-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
InvaderRam.
InvaderRam
Moderatori still think the running game has to carry this offense. so i’d add rushing yards per game.
130 rushing yards per game would put them in the top 10. last year was 109.5
more than that they averaged 4.1 yards per carry. it’d be nice if they could improve that to 4.5 yards per carry. that would have ranked in the top 10 last year.
InvaderRam
Moderatorok.
how about the the dandy-line?
get it?
dandy dline
dandelion…
InvaderRam
Moderatori say win. i see this team just being better in all phases of the game compared to last year.
you know. a lot of key players are at a stage in their careers where they it could just click for them. i’m talking guys in the running back corps, wide receiver corps, defensive line, linebacker corps, and secondary. if they all click at the same time, it could be magical.
we’ll see, but i don’t think i’ve been this positive about the rams in a long time.
InvaderRam
Moderatori think this is the year that michael brockers breaks out.
it’s his third year. physically he’s starting to mature. technically. he must be light years from where he started as a rookie.
i think we start to see what we really have in michael this season. much like robert quinn in his third year. i think this dline really becomes the dominant force we’ve been talking about but haven’t quite seen yet. it’s going to be wonderful.
September 6, 2014 at 8:58 pm in reply to: Report I saw on Herd board says Raiders close to a deal in Oakland #6346InvaderRam
Moderatorsorry. don’t mean to be stirring shit up. i started out as a st. louis rams fans. and i love the city of st. louis. great sports town.
but i get this weird feeling that they are moving to los angeles next year.
September 6, 2014 at 3:23 pm in reply to: If the Rams offense can have an effective passing game and put at least 25 point #6323InvaderRam
Moderatori think this is a reasonable expectation. the offense should be better than last year. but more than that. i think the defense will be better. this will result in more turnovers, better field position, and maybe even some more touchdowns.
i think 25 points is possible.
InvaderRam
Moderatori don’t know about 13-3. but i like the optimism. i really like shaun hill. i think he’s a definite upgrade from last year, and i think we improve at most positions through experience alone.
i still think dallas, philadelphia, and the second seattle game are potential stumbling blocks, so i’d go 10-6.
September 6, 2014 at 3:05 pm in reply to: how much you want to bet that Stacy is actually better than Cunningham #6321InvaderRam
Moderatori think tre mason ends up being the best of all of them. he’s got the wiggle and vision that cunningham lacks. and the burst that stacy lacks.
he just needs to learn how to block.
InvaderRam
Moderatormy only hope is that time has caught up to adrian peterson.
he’s sitting at 2000 carries right now. right about the time nfl running backs start breaking down.
he’s 29 years old which is old for a running back. if he’s lucky, he’s got one solid season left in him. but i’m not sure we gotta worry about a 200 yard game from him.
i hope.
InvaderRam
Moderatori’m actually gaining confidence. i think you make good points.
but i think shaun hill surprises. he’s got a very good cast around him.
also i think the niners are on their way down. i think their window has passed. guys are getting old and suspended. i think the rams have a clear shot and overtaking them. they won’t reach the seahawks, but i think they’re more than capable of taking second place. i’m predicting 10-6.
InvaderRam
Moderatori expect us to see a lot of different things come sunday.
donald has been up and down this preseason. i think it goes to show just how difficult the defensive tackle position can be. even for someone as pro-ready as donald.
by the end of the season, i think we start to see the real aaron donald.
InvaderRam
Moderatori don’t think the article was that bad. i think sam catches on somewhere. i think the response to sam has been mostly positive. he has the seventh highest selling jersey. someone is going to sign this guy.
InvaderRam
Moderatorit makes the most sense to me to see either the chargers or rams move to los angeles. they have an existing fan base there. the raiders? probably not solid enough of an organization for the nfl to be supportive of that decision.
August 26, 2014 at 12:13 am in reply to: for those who are arguing Rams shoulda drafted a qb high #5169InvaderRam
Moderatorwith the other qbs it was well you gotta draft qb such and such because you need a qb and qbs are such a valuable commodity in today’s nfl…
with luck it was well you gotta draft him cuz he’s the best player available in this draft.
it was pretty much universally agreed that qbs are getting overdrafted because of their position. even bradford. suh was regarded as the best player available, but the rams drafted sam because… he was a qb. in retrospect, mccoy woulda been the best pick but that’s a different argument.
with luck. he was considered the best prospect period. that’s how i saw it.
-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
InvaderRam.
-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
InvaderRam.
InvaderRam
Moderatorbradford’s injury can be overcome. like many have said here over and over again you just feel worse for bradford than the rams. that should always be true. but it’s especially true in this case. hill will be fine in this offense. oline has to get it together. i’m not as impressed with the running offense as most were. i think there’s a lot of work to do there still. and the wide receivers are the best they’ve had in some time. at least better than any in the last three years. so they should help out the qb too.
i’m also expecting big things out of the defense even though the secondary is looking kind of shaky right now.
InvaderRam
Moderatorhere’s another article i found interesting. i’ll just include one part but provide the link. i wonder if bradford has narrow notches. i wonder in general how strong his ligaments are. he’s had three severe ligament injuries already in 5 years.
http://www.txsportsmed.com/acl.php
Are certain athletes predisposed to the injury?
Dr. Souryal: My study was the first to describe the link between bony anatomy and ACL tears and to describe the way of measuring it. We found that a certain segment of the population has a bone structure that predisposes them to an ACL tear. The ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) live in a tunnel at the end of your thigh bone. If that tunnel is very narrow (which you can detect by X-ray), then there’s no room for the ACL to maneuver in cutting activity, and those people are at 26 times more risk of tearing an ACL.
In 1992, we took X-rays of 1,000 high school athletes’ knees and followed them for the next two years. Whenever a player went down with an ACL injury, we looked at his notch. And it was phenomenal: The kids who were blowing out their ACLs all had those narrow notches. We stopped the study early because the numbers were so dramatic. I’m sure that there are a lot of factors that go into ACL injuries — the notch is just one of them — and the biggest question right now is, what lives inside the narrow notch? Does a small ACL live in a narrow notch and tears because it’s never had the room to grow properly? Or does a normal-sized ACL live in the small notch and ruptures because it doesn’t have the room? We don’t have answers because we’re not doing surgery on uninjured people and measuring their ACLs.
As a next phase, we’re waiting for MRIs to get a bit clearer to allow us to measure the normal ACLs in the notches. Maybe in the next couple of years, we’ll be able to answer the question. If it is a normal-sized ACL in the notch, then maybe we can go in there surgically and widen the notch, and perhaps save that person from an ACL rupture. But if it’s an underdeveloped ACL in that narrow notch, you can widen the notch all day long and you’re not going to fix it. Once we get this question answered, maybe we can do something about people with the predisposition.
In ’92, we found that girls have proportionally narrower notches than boys. Does that have anything to do with the fact that ACL injuries are epidemic among females? I don’t know, but I certainly do think that it’s one factor. Other factors have to do with muscle development and neuromuscular coordination, because the boys are encouraged to be active athletically almost from birth. They may develop better neuromuscular coordination and therefore are somewhat protected as they get into high school and college. Girls are not necessarily directed into athletics early in life, and as they become more athletically active in their teens, they may not have the neuromuscular coordination that boys have. The bottom line is that nobody knows for sure. But there’s definitely a higher incidence of ACL ruptures in female athletes than in male athletes.
InvaderRam
Moderatorbut yeah. going back to my ap statement. that was wrong. 95% are a success. so that’s not the exception. i was going overboard. but again. maybe not enough attention was focused on the possibility of failure. what is the recovery rate then? i’m sure the doctors went over this with bradford.
in the end. sam is a competitor. and he was probably thinking i can do it. 5% is an acceptable risk to me. well now. he’s that exception. now what is the prognosis for recovery for that second tear?
the one article said 14%. but again. most people don’t get the best surgeon to do their reconstructive surgery so maybe it’s even lower than that. and that doesn’t take into account if the injury was isolated or not. and most people probably don’t go through the extensive rehab process that these athletes do. but if sam wants to be sure of a complete recovery. he better take the two full years to recover. which seems to be the best option at this point. anytime you have to go in a second time. you’re doing more damage. healing of that area is going to take longer than before. so if two years is ideal for first reconstructive surgery, then second reconstructive surgery should be longer than that. and even then. how long is that joint going to last? i read somewhere that acl surgeries last on average about 10 years. well. is that for professional athletes or just the general population? if it’s for the general population, then for professional athletes, it goes way down i’m sure.
-
This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts