Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
InvaderRamModeratordidn’t make a difference? i don’t know. my guess is while they still would have had a pretty impressive record over that period of time, it could have meant a difference of one or two superbowls. possibly?
anyway. as punishment they should make them play without cleats for the superbowl. and with leather helmets.
InvaderRamModeratortre jackson – 6’3 7/8″ 323 pounds 11 1/8″ hands.
InvaderRamModeratorand they traded away the right to draft rgiii.
so that’s two things going for them. wonder what snead really thought about rgiii.
InvaderRamModeratorwondering how good snead and the scouting department are at evaluating quarterbacks.
January 19, 2015 at 9:32 pm in reply to: Alex Van Pelt or Chudzinski for OC? Rams ask permission to speak to both. #16895
InvaderRamModeratoryou say you like hundley. what do you like specifically about hundley?
January 19, 2015 at 1:16 pm in reply to: Alex Van Pelt or Chudzinski for OC? Rams ask permission to speak to both. #16875
InvaderRamModeratorregardless. whatever oc the rams hire is going to need a healthy offensive line and a healthy quarterback.
cuz probably more important than hiring martz was trading for a hall of fame running back, signing a potential hall of fame qb from the arena league, and having a potential hall of fame left tackle anchoring your line.
yeah. if bradford can stay healthy. and greg robinson can realize his potential. add a couple more pieces on the offensive line. and if tre mason can build off his rookie year. yeah. whatever oc they hire will have an easier time than schotty.
January 19, 2015 at 12:58 pm in reply to: Alex Van Pelt or Chudzinski for OC? Rams ask permission to speak to both. #16873
InvaderRamModeratorworking with mccarthy is what would be most appealing to me. he was also the running backs coach before moving to qbs.
i don’t know. i look for something to stand out about him but i don’t see much.
January 19, 2015 at 11:47 am in reply to: Alex Van Pelt or Chudzinski for OC? Rams ask permission to speak to both. #16868
InvaderRamModeratori don’t like what i read about van pelt.
January 19, 2015 at 9:46 am in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16855
InvaderRamModeratorwaterfield
If there was ever a game where one team “lost” the game as opposed to another team “winning” it this was the one. The Packers beat up and led the Wilson led Hawks for 90% of the game. They “lost” it at the end of the game because of 3 critical plays. 1) the unfathomable lay down after the interception; 2) the failure to hold onto the onside kick; 3) the unbelievable failure of the defender to play the desperate two point pass. A different result in any ONE of those results in a Packers win.
Wilson can and should be congratulated for about 5 minutes of his play today. But he was totally outplayed by a gimpy Rogers.
Assuming the Patriots win this evening I will be shocked if they can’t beat the Hawks in the SB.
And give him the Rams and the Rams O line Wilson does not make the Rams a 13-3 team. He didn’t even do that with a far better Seattle team.
well. i bet they’re a winning team. and what qb would make the rams a 13-3 team with that oline?
January 19, 2015 at 7:59 am in reply to: Super Agent Lee Steinberg addresses the LA Rams fans today Jan 18th #16850
InvaderRamModeratorhey grits i realize this is a very sensitive subject for you but let’s try and tone it down. just a little.
great pics by the way. it would be very cool for all the loyal rams fans in la to see their team come back. there’s a lot of history in los angeles. from that perspective it would be very cool to see the team move back.
January 18, 2015 at 11:55 pm in reply to: Super Agent Lee Steinberg addresses the LA Rams fans today Jan 18th #16838
InvaderRamModeratori think the nfl wants kroenke to win this race. kroenke hasn’t gone rogue, and in fact, he’s going about this exactly the way the league would have him do it.
it’s just a hunch. but unless spanos can somehow figure out a stadium deal in los angeles, the rams will be going back to los angeles. aeg has until april of this year i believe to find a team. even then they seem to be falling apart and out of the league’s favor.
Farmers Field could go way of other L.A. stadium plans
By Vincent Bonsignore, Los Angeles Daily News
POSTED: 01/06/15, 10:08 PM PST | UPDATED: 1 WEEK, 4 DAYS AGO 5 COMMENTS
While most of Los Angeles basked in the possibilities of the Rams returning to the Southland to play NFL football again — this time at a new stadium on the site of the former Hollywood Park Race Track in Inglewood — the resolve and commitment at the Anschutz Entertainment Group offices in downtown Los Angeles remained surprisingly upbeat and positive Tuesday.There is no doubt the St. Louis Rams owner’s announcement that he is joining forces with Hollywood Park developers to build an 80,000-seat football stadium could be a punishing blow to AEG’s grand plan to build Farmers Field adjacent to Staples Center.
Maybe even a knockout punch.
If Rams owner Stan Kroenke follows through on this plan and his franchise makes the move to Inglewood, it will mean Farmers Field falling by the wayside as so many other stadium proposals have over the past 20 years in Los Angeles.
It could be a demise that was inadvertently triggered by former AEG president Tim Leiweke, whose passion for Farmers Field was initially its greatest strength but eventually became part of its downfall.
Leiweke’s enthusiasm lifted Farmers Field off the ground and took it further than even AEG head Phil Anschutz ever believed possible.
In some ways, history will likely look back on Leiweke with gratitude for showing the NFL that the necessary political and financial resources can actually come together in Los Angeles to green-light a world-class football stadium.
In doing so, he helped put Los Angeles back on the NFL radar in a way it hadn’t been for years.
Ultimately, though, it was Leiweke’s overly ambitious and public negotiating tactics that turned off the NFL — which prefers to turn its business dealings on mute — while also creating some animosity within the offices of AEG.
Leiweke lost his job as a result, and Farmers Field fell off the tracks in the process.
It can be argued the project has never regained its footing since, despite the efforts of Anschutz to get it back on track.
In the meantime, other local stadium ideas began percolating.
Including the plan Kroenke rolled out to the world late Sunday night.
And while there is a feeling Kroenke and the Rams will eventually land in Inglewood, AEG is not giving up the fight just yet.
“The sense I’ve gotten the last two days is it’s still full bore ahead,” said a source at AEG.
That was after the statement AEG released Monday:
“We continue our efforts to advance Farmers Field and we remain confident in the advantages of our project over any of the other sites that have been rumored for a new football stadium. Farmers Field offers a highly desirable location at L.A. LIVE, billions in existing infrastructure and complimentary facilities surrounding the site, and a fully entitled project able to host two NFL franchises without the legal, political and taxpayer risk that other sites face.”
There are reasons to be hopeful, as fading as they might be.
The first is that Kroenke went off the ranch on this one, pulled an end-around on the NFL and brokered a deal independent of the league’s carefully crafted wishes.
And that the NFL will ultimately vote down Kroenke’s request for relocation, should it come to that.
But after talking to a high-ranking official Tuesday, it appears that isn’t the case.
In fact, the NFL appears on board with what Kroenke is doing.
The second is that Kroenke — and the NFL — is simply using the threat of Los Angeles to motivate St. Louis leaders into building a new stadium that will keep the Rams along the banks of the Mississippi River.
Or, as another NFL official told me: “This is a bidding war.”
And that would make Kroenke’s bombshell especially well timed.
Later this week, a St. Louis task force made up of former Anheuser-Busch president Dave Peacock and attorney Bob Blitz is expected to present Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon with a plan they believe will keep the Rams in St. Louis. Now more than ever, that plan needs to be foolproof.
Or else.
At least publicly, Peacock and Blitz remain confident.
“The news today is another reminder of how much competition there can be for National Football League franchises and projects that include NFL stadiums, but it does not change our timeline or approach,” Peacock and Blitz said in a statement. “It is important to remember this will be a long-term process, but one that the State of Missouri and the St. Louis region are fully pledged to seeing through.
“We are ready to demonstrate our commitment to keeping the NFL here, and to continue to illustrate why St. Louis has been and will always be a strong NFL market. We will present a plan to Governor Nixon this Friday as scheduled, and we expect that it will meet his criteria, thereby allowing us to share our vision with the public shortly thereafter. In the meantime, we will continue to have discussions with the NFL, as well as Rams leadership.”
Still, it seems Kroenke resorted to an especially hard-handed negotiating tactic if his plan really is to stay in St. Louis. No surprise, then, that some city leaders have drawn a line in the sand.
Jeff Rainford, spokesman for St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay, told reporters Monday that Slay doesn’t believe St. Louis should just hand the Rams the key to the city now that Los Angeles has come into the picture.
“A National Football League franchise does have value, and we should want one, but let’s use some common sense,” Rainford said. “The parameters are not a blank check.”
In fact, one wonders if Kroenke has poisoned the waters in jilted St. Louis to the point there is no going back. Can you imagine Rams fans opening their arms and wallets to a franchise that seemingly has its heart on being somewhere else?
And does the NFL really want that kind of public-relations nightmare on its hands moving forward — especially with all the other perception issues the league is dealing with?
The last hope for Farmers Field is the NFL stepping in to help broker a deal between AEG and either the San Diego Chargers or Oakland Raiders, who remain mired in uphill battles to build new local stadiums.
That remains a possibility, but with Kroenke making such a bold move it seems obvious the NFL is behind him.
All of which bodes well for the Rams adding Los Angeles back to their name.
Only they will be playing in Inglewood rather than downtown.
If so, Farmers Field will meet the same fate as so many other Los Angeles stadium plans over the past 20 years.
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 5 months ago by
InvaderRam.
InvaderRamModeratorit’s gonna get really annoying…
January 18, 2015 at 6:46 pm in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16829
InvaderRamModeratorGot to hand it to Wilson. He made some huge throws on his last two drives. Beautiful throws.
yeah. that overtime drive. perfect.
January 18, 2015 at 6:33 pm in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16825
InvaderRamModeratorunbelievable.
crazy.
January 18, 2015 at 6:30 pm in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16823
InvaderRamModeratorhells bells.
January 18, 2015 at 6:10 pm in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16819
InvaderRamModeratorwell shit.
January 18, 2015 at 5:34 pm in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16817
InvaderRamModeratoryeah. injured by his own teammate. what a shame.
January 18, 2015 at 5:27 pm in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16815
InvaderRamModeratorrichard sherman hurt his left arm.
haha. can’t help but feel a little happy about all this.
January 18, 2015 at 5:24 pm in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16813
InvaderRamModeratornot quite this bad though.
i mean this has to be some sort of career worst for him.
January 18, 2015 at 5:05 pm in reply to: Seattle doing nothing so far (he said in the 1st half) #16811
InvaderRamModeratorgreen bay indianapolis would be cool.
i’m shocked wilson is playing so badly. it seems like he’s under a lot of pressure though.
January 18, 2015 at 2:07 pm in reply to: relocation: Former Raiders CEO Amy Trask Talks Kroenke, Rams' Future & Stadium #16807
InvaderRamModeratorat the end of that article.
The league has also been in negotiations with AEG about a potential deal at Farmers Field, a proposed downtown stadium next to L.A. Live. In the 20 years since the Raiders and Rams left, the NFL has fostered the idea of competing sites to get the best deal. Rooney said that continues to be the case.
“I think next year is a time frame that I would hope that we at least go through a site-selection process and at that point are in a position where we have a site where we’d all feel comfortable putting a stadium,” he said. “Then we’d be ready to go through a relocation process where we all understand that there’s a first-class NFL stadium for a team to move to.”
InvaderRamModeratorwow 10% chance of trading up? that’s pretty high. although there’s a half a chance the qbs could drop a little. maybe that opens things up for a trade.
InvaderRamModeratorfor me it is about bernie. i think his argument and logic is flawed at best.
now have the rams underperformed? yes.
i don’t know that it necessarily means that they gotta start firing coaches.
InvaderRamModeratorthe only things i can think of so far are cut long and wells. focus on re-signing britt. maybe sign a fa olineman.
January 18, 2015 at 10:28 am in reply to: 2015 Shrine Game … plus looking ahead to the Senior Bowl #16795
InvaderRamModeratorThis kid created some ‘buzz, they say. Maybe grab this kid in a late round.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/is-old-dominions-taylor-heinicke-the-best-quarterback-in-virginia/
Is Old Dominion’s Taylor Heinicke the Best QB in Virginia
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=113555&draftyear=2015&genpos=QB
w
vinteresting prospect. can run a little bit. hope he’s got big hands.
January 17, 2015 at 9:35 pm in reply to: relocation: Former Raiders CEO Amy Trask Talks Kroenke, Rams' Future & Stadium #16775
InvaderRamModeratorthey also want st. louis, kroenke, aeg, roski, san diego, and los angeles all competing against each other to get the best available stadiums possible for the nfl.
and fans get jobbed in the end no?
January 17, 2015 at 9:29 pm in reply to: relocation: Former Raiders CEO Amy Trask Talks Kroenke, Rams' Future & Stadium #16774
InvaderRamModeratorI don’t know what this is worth.
But I think the most glorious outcome right now for the NFL is Kroenke’s stadium. Of all the outcomes I look at right now, Kroenke’s is the sexiest.
Does that matter?
Well…it might.
i think it is the most attractive.
at this point it’s up to the chargers to leapfrog ahead of the rams. i also wonder if aeg now has extra incentive to cut a deal with an nfl team.
January 17, 2015 at 3:12 pm in reply to: relocation: Former Raiders CEO Amy Trask Talks Kroenke, Rams' Future & Stadium #16754
InvaderRamModeratorIf the league approved a Spanos move,
and Spanos had a stadium deal in LA,
what would that do to Kroenke’s leverage
in St.Louis? He’d lose any leverage he had, yes? No?
Would he threaten to move somewhere else? 2nd team in LA ?The league has to love all this leverage its manufactured.
What a great Racket for all 32 rich-white-guys.w
vwell and that’s also the balancing act that the nfl has to do cuz they don’t want the rams going back to the ed jones dome if the chargers move to la. they want that shiny new outdoor stadium.
31 rich white guys and 1 rich pakistani guy i believe.
January 17, 2015 at 1:20 pm in reply to: relocation: Former Raiders CEO Amy Trask Talks Kroenke, Rams' Future & Stadium #16745
InvaderRamModeratori’ve read that the nfl is not a real big fan of farmer’s field and spanos is unlikely to sell part of his team. in fact aeg i’ve read wants majority ownership. that leads me to believe that kroenke’s in the lead for a move to la. my guess is the nfl is strongly against davis and the raiders moving to los angeles.
January 17, 2015 at 11:07 am in reply to: relocation: Former Raiders CEO Amy Trask Talks Kroenke, Rams' Future & Stadium #16742
InvaderRamModeratoralso the tv revenue. is that one year or indefinite?
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 5 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

